INSERT INTO [AdventureWorksDW].[dbo].[DimSaleType]
([SaleType]
,[Description])
VALUES
('I',
'Internet Sales')
.... Error:
Msg 8152, Level 16, State 4, Line 1
String or binary data would be truncated.
The statement has been terminated.
Table info
-------------
SaleType pk char(1)
SaleTypeDescription nchar(10)
It seems that the primary key field accepts numeric data, isn't it possible to have a primary key with non-numeric data? This is because this is a lookup table with a small number of rows.
when I run below query I got Error of Arithmetic overflow error converting numeric to data type numeric declare @a numeric(16,4)
set @a=99362600999900.0000
The 99362600999900 value before numeric is 14 and variable that i declared is of 16 length. Then why this error is coming ? When I set Length 18 then error removed.
I'm getting the above when trying to populate a variable. The values in question are : @N = 21 @SumXY = -1303765191530058.2251000000 @SumXSumY = -5338556963168643.7875000000
When I run, SELECT (@N * @SumXY) - (@SumXSumY * @SumXSumY) in QA I get the result OK which is -28500190448996439680147097583285.072256 ie 32 places to left of decimal and 6 to the right When I try the following ie to populate a variable with that value I get the error - SELECT R2Top = (@N * @SumXY) - (@SumXSumY * @SumXSumY)@R2Top is NUMERIC (38, 10)
Uma writes "Hi Dear, I have A Table , Which Primary key consists of 6 columns. total Number of Columns in the table are 16. Now i Want to Convert my Composite Primary key into simple primary key.there are already 2200 records in the table and no referential integrity (foriegn key ) exist.
may i convert Composite Primary key into simple primary key in thr table like this.
I have recently been looking at a database and wondered if anyone can tell me what the advantages are supporting a unique collumn, which can essentially be seen as the primary key, with an identity seed integer primary key.
For example:
id [unique integer auto incremented primary key - not null], ClientCode [unique index varchar - not null], name [varchar null], surname [varchar null]
isn't it just better to use ClientCode as the primary key straight of because when one references the above table, it can be done easier with the ClientCode since you dont have to do a lookup on the ClientCode everytime.
We have a table, which has one clustered index and one non clustered index(primary key). I want to drop the existing clustered index and make the primary key as clustered. Is there any easy way to do that. Will Drop_Existing support on this matter?
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[property_instance] ( [property_instance_id] [int] IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL , [application_id] [int] NOT NULL , [owner_id] [nvarchar] (100) NOT NULL , [property_id] [int] NOT NULL , [owner_type_id] [int] NOT NULL , [property_value] [ntext] NOT NULL , [date_created] [datetime] NOT NULL , [date_modified] [datetime] NULL )
I have created an 'artificial' primary key, property_instance_id. The 'true' primary key is application_id, owner_id, property_id and owner_type_id
In this specific instance - property_instance_id will never be a foreign key into another table - queries will generally use application_id, owner_id, property_id and owner_type_id in the WHERE clause when searching for a particular row - Once inserted, none of the application_id, owner_id, property_id or owner_type_id columns will ever be modified
I generally like to create artificial primary keys whenever the primary key would otherwise consist of more than 2 columns.
What do people think the advantages and disadvantages of each technique are? Do you recommend I go with the existing model, or should I remove the artificial primary key column and just go with a 4 column primary key for this table?
Hello,Im calling a stored proc that has a numeric value as a varible.In the asp im using the code:myPrivate.Parameters.Add("@memberID", SqlDbType.Decimal, 18).Value = Decimal.Parse(uxToText.Text);I'm using decimal as there is no numeric sqldb type, is this correct? Also is the decimal parse correct as Im getting a 'Input string was not in a correct format' error.Thanks
Hello, I am from the school of thought that you should in every case have your primary keys as numeric values only. However, where I currently work there is a project leader who is a recent FoxPro convert (I know, they are tough ones to crack). I made the suggestion recently that the keys in the table should be numeric and with him being the project leader and me just a lowely developer he said get lost. I made the point that later joining your tables together in a PK/FK relationship where the keys where character would be slower then with numeric keys. He didn't listen and now we are approaching production with a database that is really just a bunch of text file. He said that with SQL 7 it doesn't matter if the pk is numeric or character. I disagree. But I need solid documentation to take to him and to the managers to convince them. If anyone out there could advise me on this. And if anyone could give me or tell me where I could find documentation on why even in SQL 7 there is a need to use numeric keys that would be a great help and you would be making one more shop in this world a little bit more technically sound :-) Thank you in advance for your help.
Is there a numeric data type that formats the number with commas - eg 1000 becomes 1,000 and 1000000 becomes 1,000,000. Having tried several numeric data types the commas are removed. I tried entering 1000 into MS Access on the same machine and hey presto - it spits out 1,000.
I'm having trouble with a query where I need to limit a resultset by comparing (using a WHERE clause) a field that is alphanumeric with one that is numeric. I've tried converting, casting, and case statements, but I either get an overflow error or a big slap on the wrist by SQL Server 2005. Does anyone have any good solutions to this? I've been racking my brain for a while now.
I am keep getting an arithmetic overflow converting float to type numeric when running a script that looks something like this.
insert into table1 ( column1 ) select column2 from source server.
column1 is a numeric (28,8) and column2 is float. there are about 2000000 records in column2, and I know that when I tried just copying the top 1000000 wasn't a problem.
does anyone know what could be causing this problem???
*it's not because the data in column2 is out of range.
Here's my LINQ code:pl = (from p in db.Table where p.ID == 1 orderby p.NumericField descending select p).Take(7); As you can see, I'm trying to sort by a numeric field. Specifically, it's a Numeric(5,0) field. Problem is, the results aren't coming back numeric order. If this is good LINQ code, perhaps it's something else in my app. I just want to make sure this LINQ code is good. Thanks in advance
I'm using a DTS package to import a large CSV file. There is a particular column that contains text or numbers. I want to delete the row if that column has a number, I've used IsNumeric in the selection portion of the statement, but can't figure out how to use it as part of my where clause.
I have a database table with 2 numeric fields. The values to be inserted into these fields come from text boxes in an ASP.NET page. So in the parameters to add into these fields I simply use 'textbox1.text' & textbox2.text'.
One of the fields accepts the data within the text box and adds it into the appropriate numeric data field in the table. However on the other text box I get an error message 'Error converting data type nvarchar to numeric.'
Does anyone know why this occurs just on the one entry and not the other?, and if anyone has any suggestions on how to get around this please let me know.
Hello, everyone! What are the precision & the scale values in the numeric field for?(as also in int, etc).I need to have a field that is exactly 6 digits in length. However , when I enter the value , in the length column , it defaults to either 5 or 9 , depending on the precision values. Also when I enter the data , that field accepts not only 9(defined with precision of 10), but more than that, till about 15 digits!!…I think I am not clear on the use of precision…what do I need to define the field as so it accepts only 6 digits? Please enlighten me . Thanks in advance!
I am unfamiliar with the built-in functions in SQL Server. I would like to display a numeric field with leading zeros. In oracle the sql stmt would be:
Help! I am bcp-ing in and out large amounts of data. It is a 2 column table, the 2nd column being a text field of length 16. In this text field is a large amount of XML data, about a page when I look at the text file. It has lots of text with lots of tags. It looks something like this "<Paper value = "hi" <!-- --> etc. etc".
I have no trouble BCP OUT but when I try to BCP IN, I get this error:
Starting copy... SQLstate = 22003, NativeError = 0 Error = [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver]Numeric value out of range SQLstate = 22003, NativeError = 0 Error = [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver]Numeric value out of range SQLstate = 22003, NativeError = 0 Error = [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver]Numeric value out of range SQLstate = 22003, NativeError = 0 Error = [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver]Invalid character value for cast specification
Can someone pls help me with how to check for a numeric value in a varchar column?
For example I have a column called client_id , it has values "AB" , "CD" , "18", "19" . I need to delete those client_id where the values are 18 and 19. How would I do that?
hi , can anyone tell me if there exists a function in SQL Server that help me determine if a variable is ALL Alphanumeric data or not by returning a 0 or 1 when condition fails or succeeds . thank you
I noticed in SQL ODBC API reference that SQLGetTypeInfo would return true for AUTO_INCREMENT if a smallint field is defined as autoincrement. Is there a simple way to set a field autoincrement thru the SQL Server`s front end?
