Pros And Cons Of Using Stored Procedures

Sep 19, 2007

Im about to start converting code to Stored Procedures for all my reports in Reporting Services. I was wondering what the pros and cons of this may be.

View 17 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Pros And Cons Of Stored Procedures

Mar 28, 2004

can anyone explain the Pros and Cons of Stored Procedures ??

thanks

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL Server Pros And Cons

May 22, 2002

My company is thinking about moving to a product that uses Microsoft SQL Server and I have been asked to find out what are the Pros and Cons of the product, if any.

Any feedback is appreciated.

Thank You

Pam

View 2 Replies View Related

Upgrade SQL 7 To SQL 2K: Pros And Cons

Aug 13, 2001

Anyone know where I could find some good articles about pros and cons of upgrading SQL 7 to SQL 2K?

Our boss suddenly got this bug up his rear that we need to upgrade. :(
Probably because we are to a point where everything is running smoothly, and he needs to throw a monkey wrench in it.

We are a very small shop, and are not stressing SQL 7 in the least. I am interested to read some articles about SQL 2K, because right now, I can't see any possible reason an upgrade would be worth doing.

Thanks.

View 2 Replies View Related

Pros / Cons To This Approach

Nov 3, 2005

I have a requirement where I need to perform a query for positioninformation. But for some types of entries, I need to "expand" the rowto include additional position rows. Let me explain with an example:An index is a security that is made up of components where eachcomponent has a "weight" or a number of shares. So if I have 1 share ofthe index, I have X shares of each component.AAPL is an Equity, CSCO is an Equity, SPY is an Index. Lets say thatSPY has one component, AAPL, with shares being 10. (1 share of SPY = 10shares of AAPL).So, I do some trading and I end up with positions as follows:+10 AAPL-5 CSCO+2 SPYThe query I need returns:+10 AAPL-5 CSCO+2 SPY+20 AAPL (from 2 SPY * 10 shares)which becomes (after grouping):+30 AAPL-5 CSCO+2 SPY-----------------------------------------Based on that criteria and the following schema (and sample data):-- Drop tablesDROP TABLE [SecurityMaster]DROP TABLE [Position]DROP TABLE [IndexComponent]-- Create tablesCREATE TABLE [SecurityMaster] ([Symbol] VARCHAR(10), [SecurityType] VARCHAR(10))CREATE TABLE [Position] ([Account] VARCHAR(10), [Symbol] VARCHAR(10), [Position] INT)CREATE TABLE [IndexComponent] ([IndexSymbol] VARCHAR(10), [ComponentSymbol] VARCHAR(10), [Shares] INT)--Populate tablesINSERT INTO [SecurityMaster] VALUES ('AAPL', 'Equity')INSERT INTO [SecurityMaster] VALUES ('MSFT', 'Equity')INSERT INTO [SecurityMaster] VALUES ('MNTAM', 'Option')INSERT INTO [SecurityMaster] VALUES ('CSCO', 'Equity')INSERT INTO [SecurityMaster] VALUES ('SPY', 'Index')INSERT INTO [Position] VALUES ('001', 'AAPL', 10)INSERT INTO [Position] VALUES ('001', 'MSFT', -5)INSERT INTO [Position] VALUES ('001', 'CSCO', 10)INSERT INTO [Position] VALUES ('001', 'SPY', 15)INSERT INTO [Position] VALUES ('001', 'QQQQ', 21)INSERT INTO [Position] VALUES ('002', 'MNTAM', 10)INSERT INTO [Position] VALUES ('002', 'APPL', 20)INSERT INTO [Position] VALUES ('003', 'SPY', -2)INSERT INTO [IndexComponent] VALUES ('SPY', 'AAPL', 25)INSERT INTO [IndexComponent] VALUES ('SPY', 'CSCO', 50)INSERT INTO [IndexComponent] VALUES ('QQQQ', 'AAPL', 33)-- *****************************-- Based on the rules:-- 1) Index positions appear like other positions (account /symbol) pair, but-- its components show up as new rows of account (of index),symbol (equal--to component symbol), position (equal to shares * index position)-- 2) One row for each account / symbol pair (GROUP BY account andsymbol, SUM position)-- Expected output (without grouping) (sorted by account / symbol)-- 001 AAPL 10-- 001 AAPL 375 (component shares * index position) (25* 15) (SPY)-- 001 AAPL 693 (component shares * index position) (33* 21) (QQQQ)-- 001 CSCO 10-- 001 CSCO 750 (component shares * index position) (50* 15) (SPY)-- 001 MSFT -5-- 001 QQQQ 21-- 001 SPY 15-- 002 AAPL 20-- 002 MNTAM 10-- 003 AAPL -50 (component shares * index position) (25* -2) (SPY)-- 003 CSCO -100 (component shares * index position) (50* -2) (SPY)-- 003 SPY -2-- Expected output (with grouping account / symbol) (sorted by account/ symbol)-- 001 AAPL 1078-- 001 CSCO 760-- 001 MSFT -5-- 001 QQQQ 21-- 001 SPY 15-- 002 AAPL 20-- 002 MNTAM 10-- 003 AAPL -50-- 003 CSCO -100-- 003 SPY -2---------------------------------------------Is a UNION the best way to perform the query. What are the pros andcons? What, if any, is a better way?SELECT[Account], [Symbol], SUM([Position]) AS [Position]FROM(SELECT[Account], [Symbol] , [Position]FROM[Position]UNION ALLSELECTP.[Account] , IC.[ComponentSymbol] AS [Symbol] , (P.[Position] *IC.[Shares]) AS [Position]FROM[IndexComponent] ICJOIN[Position] PONP.[Symbol] = IC.[IndexSymbol]) DGROUP BY[Account], [Symbol]ORDER BY[Account], [Symbol]

View 5 Replies View Related

UniqueIdentifier Pros And Cons ??

Jul 20, 2005

Hi alli am building a SQL 2000 database that it is proving a littlechallenging, i have companies with multiple addresses, phone numbers,owning mine sites etc and also joint ventures so maybe you get thepicture with a few design issues that i ma encounteringMy queriy is about a primary key identity, and which one to use withrespect to either the identity data type or the unique identifier ,I am aessentiall building an address table to hold all multipleaddresses as well as phone numbers etc, so my desire to have a uniqueidentity for each record is very important.My view is i will run in to violation errors by just using the tableidentity data type, i could i suppose use composit primary keys butthat may have a performance impact, although thiis will not be a hightransaction database.Does anyone know about performance issues regarding each identitysolution, by using a generated 16 bit identifier there are going to behuge numbers for the DB to verify. or am i worried about nothing?any views greatly appreciatedregardsGreg

View 17 Replies View Related

Network Backup Again - What Are The Pros And Cons

Sep 11, 2007

Thanks for the help on the previous thread.

It seems to me that either by accident or design, SQL Server tends to steer you away from backing up directly over the network.

Are there reasons for not doing this because you obviously don't want to leave your backups on a local drive in case the drive fails?

Some possibilties that I can think of are:-

1. Local drives have faster access times and SQL backups can get quite large. I did a quick test and found that a netwrok backup takes 2 to 3 times longer than it does on a local drive.
2. Backing up on the netwrok could hog too much bandwidth. I haven't tested this and would be surprised it it's true.
3. There could be some reason that you don't want the Server and Agent services running under a domain account but want to leave them on the Local System account. I am not aware of any such reasons by the way.
4. Local drives persumably have a slightly higher availability than network drives. If the server is running, the drive should be available.

View 8 Replies View Related

What Are The Cons And Pros Of Using Nvarchar(max) Versus Ntext?

Apr 4, 2007

Like in the subject: What are the cons and pros of using nvarchar(max) versus ntext?
Does it have something to do with having to enable full text search perhaps in the latter case?

View 2 Replies View Related

Pros/Cons Of Multivalue Database Columns

Jun 27, 2004

I'm just wondering what any pros and cons of using multivalue columns in a database are.

I'm designing a database which will have a column for FABRIC_TYPES_AVAILABLE for a certain FURNITURE_ITEM. Each FURNITURE_ITEM can have multiple FABRIC_TYPES_AVAILABLE of course. So I was just going to store a 2 or 3 digit number of the FABRIC_TYPES_AVAILABLE in that row. So I would have something like....34,24,453,32,23,45,67,65,43,21,21,45.

Anyway....thanks in advance for any information. Links I could read would be great too...b/c I did do a bit of searching, but didnt find much.

View 6 Replies View Related

PROS And CONS Of Seperate Databases For CACHING...

May 9, 2006

I have a main database...for this large Web site...and Im wondering
what would be the PROS and CONS of using another database (located on
the same, or on another SQL Server). Im just thinking this would be
good incase we ever needed to take some load off one of the servers.

Also, we will be integrating Community Server into this Web site. Of
course you know CS adds its own database objects which crowd up our
main database objects.

We were thinking of giving CS its own database also; bad practice, or....it doesn't matter much?

Thank you

View 3 Replies View Related

GUID Pros And Cons (was: Question Mssql2005)

Aug 17, 2006

I was wanting to know. I am making a site that might be come big. And me and this dude are considering pickering abotu GUID. I don't want to use them but he does. And I was wondering what should we do? I know nothing about guids

View 1 Replies View Related

Query Excution Process- Pros And Cons

Jun 15, 2006

vinod writes "Q1>Should I apply filter in sequence(based on primarykey,not null,comparision,between clause) ?

-How to apply filter in correct format,and SQL server internally execute it.
Q2>Should I use 'is not Null' to be put at the last?

Q3>Should I use 'between clause' rather than relation operator i.e(empid>10 and empid<200)

Q4>Does filters of sequence has any impact on the query execution process


table1[pkey1,col1,col2,col3] -->pkey is pkey1
table2[pkey2,pkey1,col11,col12,col13]--->pkey is pkey2, and pkey1 is foreign key

CaseI->select table2.pkey2,table1.col1 ,table2.col12
from table1 inner join table2
on table1.pkey1=table2.pkey1
where (table1.col3>100 and table1.col3<300 ) and table2.pkey1=2020 and table2.col13 is not null

CaseII->select table2.pkey2,table1.col1 ,table2.col12
from table1 inner join table2
on table1.pkey1=table2.pkey1
where (table1.col3 between 101 and 299 ) and pkey1=2020 and table2.col13 is not null"

View 1 Replies View Related

Default Constraint On Columns Pros And Cons?

Oct 26, 2007



Are there any vices to using default constraints on all columns in your table.
For example an Int that defaults to 0
or a char or varchar that defaults to ''

I know that 0 and Null are not the same thing. But if your programs don't have the concept of NULL then you have to convert the NULL to zero.

So, DEFAULT CONSTRAINTS on every column. Is it good or Bad?

Thanks

Darin Clark

View 10 Replies View Related

Saving Files (Binaries) Into Database - Pros And Cons

Jun 19, 2008

Can someone provide information or a link to information regarding the pros and cons of saving files directly into a SQL 2005 database?
I'm actually for saving files to a database (cleaner implementation then just saving the location then having to get the file, etc), but my project manager is not convinced so I need to make an argument for (or against depending on what I actually find out) using varbinary data type.
Thanks.

View 2 Replies View Related

What Are Cons And Pros For Using IDENTITY Property As PK In SQL SERVER 2000?

Jul 20, 2005

Hi All!We are doing new development for SQL Server 2000 and also moving fromSQL 7.0 to SQL Server 2000.What are cons and pros for using IDENTITY property as PK in SQL SERVER2000?Please, share your experience in using IDENTITY as PK .Does SCOPE_IDENTITY makes life easier in SQL 2000?Is there issues with DENTITY property when moving DB from one serverto another? (the same version of SQL Server)Thank you in advance,Andy

View 49 Replies View Related

Storing SSIS Packages Within SQLServer; Pros/cons

Feb 26, 2008

hi all,
I was wondering if anyone knows of any pros/cons on storing SSIS (2005) packages within SQL Server 2005 SP2.
We're contemplating the migration/storage of a large number of packages, a minority of which designed in dts (SQLServer 2000) and using third party activx components.

thanks much for any feedback,
Cosmin

View 3 Replies View Related

Pros And Cons Of Placing Indexes On Separate File Groups

Apr 20, 2001

We are in the process of replacing our primary production server. In the process of determining how SQL server is going to be structured, it has been suggested that I place all current and new indexes on a separate file group. These filegroups would then reside on a separate shelf on the server. What are the pros and cons of doing this?

View 2 Replies View Related

Pros And Cons Of Using Transaction Replication Doing Initialization From Database Backups

Jun 27, 2007



I am using transaction replication between a transaction and reporting database server. When I use a snapshot to initialize my subscribers, I currently get a lot of deadlocks during the snapshot creation. I am considering using a database backup instead. Can anyone tells me how to reduce the table locks that I am getting during snapshot creation or advice on using database backups?



View 1 Replies View Related

Oracle Stored Procedures VERSUS SQL Server Stored Procedures

Jul 23, 2005

I want to know the differences between SQL Server 2000 storedprocedures and oracle stored procedures? Do they have differentsyntax? The concept should be the same that the stored proceduresexecute in the database server with better performance?Please advise good references for Oracle stored procedures also.thanks!!

View 11 Replies View Related

Stored Procedures 2005 Vs Stored Procedures 2000

Sep 30, 2006

Hi,



This Might be a really simple thing, however we have just installed SQL server 2005 on a new server, and are having difficulties with the set up of the Store Procedures. Every time we try to modify an existing stored procedure it attempts to save it as an SQL file, unlike in 2000 where it saved it as part of the database itself.



Thank you in advance for any help on this matter



View 1 Replies View Related

All My Stored Procedures Are Getting Created As System Procedures!

Nov 6, 2007



Using SQL 2005, SP2. All of a sudden, whenever I create any stored procedures in the master database, they get created as system stored procedures. Doesn't matter what I name them, and what they do.

For example, even this simple little guy:

CREATE PROCEDURE BOB

AS

PRINT 'BOB'

GO

Gets created as a system stored procedure.

Any ideas what would cause that and/or how to fix it?

Thanks,
Jason

View 16 Replies View Related

How To Search And List All Stored Procs In My Database. I Can Do This For Tables, But Need To Figure Out How To Do It For Stored Procedures

Apr 29, 2008

How do I search for and print all stored procedure names in a particular database? I can use the following query to search and print out all table names in a database. I just need to figure out how to modify the code below to search for stored procedure names. Can anyone help me out?
 SELECT TABLE_SCHEMA + '.' + TABLE_NAME
FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES
WHERE TABLE_TYPE = 'BASE TABLE'

View 1 Replies View Related

Using A Stored Procedure To Query Other Stored Procedures And Then Return The Results

Jun 13, 2007

Seems like I'm stealing all the threads here, : But I need to learn :) I have a StoredProcedure that needs to return values that other StoredProcedures return.Rather than have my DataAccess layer access the DB multiple times, I would like to call One stored Procedure, and have that stored procedure call the others to get the information I need. I think this way would be more efficient than accessing the DB  multiple times. One of my SP is:SELECT I.ItemDetailID, I.ItemDetailStatusID, I.ItemDetailTypeID, I.Archived,     I.Expired, I.ExpireDate, I.Deleted, S.Name AS 'StatusName', S.ItemDetailStatusID,    S.InProgress as 'StatusInProgress', S.Color AS 'StatusColor',T.[Name] AS 'TypeName',    T.Prefix, T.Name AS 'ItemDetailTypeName', T.ItemDetailTypeID    FROM [Item].ItemDetails I    INNER JOIN Item.ItemDetailStatus S ON I.ItemDetailStatusID = S.ItemDetailStatusID    INNER JOIN [Item].ItemDetailTypes T ON I.ItemDetailTypeID = T.ItemDetailTypeID However, I already have StoredProcedures that return the exact same data from the ItemDetailStatus table and ItemDetailTypes table.Would it be better to do it above, and have more code to change when a new column/field is added, or more checks, or do something like:(This is not propper SQL) SELECT I.ItemDetailID, I.ItemDetailStatusID, I.ItemDetailTypeID, I.Archived,     I.Expired, I.ExpireDate, I.Deleted, EXEC [Item].ItemDetailStatusInfo I.ItemDetailStatusID, EXEC [Item].ItemDetailTypeInfo I.ItemDetailTypeID    FROM [Item].ItemDetails IOr something like that... Any thoughts? 

View 3 Replies View Related

How To Save Stored Procedure To NON System Stored Procedures - Or My Database

May 13, 2008

Greetings:

I have MSSQL 2005. On earlier versions of MSSQL saving a stored procedure wasn't a confusing action. However, every time I try to save my completed stored procedure (parsed successfully ) I'm prompted to save it as a query on the hard drive.

How do I cause the 'Save' action to add the new stored procedure to my database's list of stored procedures?

Thanks!

View 5 Replies View Related

Stored Procedure Being Saved In System Stored Procedures

Apr 7, 2006

We recently upgraded to SQL Server 2005. We had several stored procedures in the master database and, rather than completely rewriting a lot of code, we just recreated these stored procedures in the new master database.

For some reason, some of these stored procedures are getting stored as "System Stored Procedures" rather than just as "Stored Procedures". Queries to sys.Objects and sys.Procedures shows that these procs are being saved with the is_ms_shipped field set to 1, even though they obviously were not shipped with the product.

I can't update the sys.Objects or sys.Procedures views in 2005.

What effect will this flag (is_ms_shipped = 1) have on my stored procedures?

Can I move these out of "System Stored Procedures" and into "Stored Procedures"?

Thanks!

View 24 Replies View Related

How Can I Call One Or More Stored Procedures Into Perticular One Stored Proc ?

Apr 23, 2008

Hello friends......How are you ? I want to ask you all that how can I do the following ?
I want to now that how many ways are there to do this ?



How can I call one or more stored procedures into perticular one Stored Proc ? in MS SQL Server 2000/05.

View 1 Replies View Related

SSIS And Stored Procedures Results Stored In #Tables

Mar 26, 2008

Hello
I'm start to work with SSIS.

We have a lot (many hundreds) of old (SQL Server2000) procedures on SQL 2005.
Most of the Stored Procedures ends with the following commands:


SET @SQLSTRING = 'SELECT * INTO ' + @OutputTableName + ' FROM #RESULTTABLE'

EXEC @RETVAL = sp_executeSQL @SQLSTRING


How can I use SSIS to move the complete #RESULTTABLE to Excel or to a Flat File? (e.g. as a *.csv -File)

I found a way but I think i'ts only a workaround:

1. Write the #Resulttable to DB (changed Prozedure)
2. create data flow task (ole DB Source - Data Conversion - Excel Destination)

Does anyone know a better way to transfer the #RESULTTABLE to Excel or Flat file?

Thanks for an early Answer
Chaepp

View 9 Replies View Related

Need Help With Project $$ Pros Only

Mar 30, 2008

Hi, I need a help with a SP, professionals only. If you're interested PM/email me please.

View 3 Replies View Related

MS SQL Stored Procedures Inside Another Stored Procedure

Jun 16, 2007

Hi,
 Do you know how to write stored procedures inside another stored procedure in MS SQL.
 
Create procedure spMyProc inputData varchar(50)
AS
 ----- some logical
 
 procedure spMyProc inputInsideData varchar(10)
AS
   --- some logical
  ---  go
-------

View 5 Replies View Related

Calling Stored Procedures From Another Stored Procedure

May 8, 2008

I am writing a set of store procedures (around 30), most of them require the same basic logic to get an ID, I was thinking to add this logic into an stored procedure.

The question is: Would calling an stored procedure from within an stored procedure affect performance? I mean, would it need to create a separate db connection? am I better off copying and pasting the logic into all the store procedures (in terms of performance)?

Thanks in advance

John

View 5 Replies View Related

Calling A Stored Procedure Inside Another Stored Procedure (or Nested Stored Procedures)

Nov 1, 2007

Hi all - I'm trying to optimized my stored procedures to be a bit easier to maintain, and am sure this is possible, not am very unclear on the syntax to doing this correctly.  For example, I have a simple stored procedure that takes a string as a parameter, and returns its resolved index that corresponds to a record in my database. ie
exec dbo.DeriveStatusID 'Created'
returns an int value as 1
(performed by "SELECT statusID FROM statusList WHERE statusName= 'Created') 
but I also have a second stored procedure that needs to make reference to this procedure first, in order to resolve an id - ie:
exec dbo.AddProduct_Insert 'widget1'
which currently performs:SET @statusID = (SELECT statusID FROM statusList WHERE statusName='Created')INSERT INTO Products (productname, statusID) VALUES (''widget1', @statusID)
I want to simply the insert to perform (in one sproc):
SET @statusID = EXEC deriveStatusID ('Created')INSERT INTO Products (productname, statusID) VALUES (''widget1', @statusID)
This works fine if I call this stored procedure in code first, then pass it to the second stored procedure, but NOT if it is reference in the second stored procedure directly (I end up with an empty value for @statusID in this example).
My actual "Insert" stored procedures are far more complicated, but I am working towards lightening the business logic in my application ( it shouldn't have to pre-vet the data prior to executing a valid insert). 
Hopefully this makes some sense - it doesn't seem right to me that this is impossible, and am fairly sure I'm just missing some simple syntax - can anyone assist?
 

View 1 Replies View Related

Maybe Trigger Failed, Deadlock Victim? Pros Click Me!!!

Mar 10, 2000

Let's say I have a trigger on my orders table.

When this fires a query is done on the customer table to get some values
and put some order/customer data into an audit trail table.

In one period of time, it appears that the trigger did not put the data into the separate table. No known reason.

Suspicion: What if the customer table were locked by some process when the trigger fired. Maybe the trigger was chosen as a deadlock-victim.

?? I guess I need to check for @@ERROR during the trigger and do something. Any suggestions? I think I can raise the priority of my trigger to "win" during a deadlock.

If trigger activity is chosen as a deadlock-victim, can the trigger make another attempt to complete it's activity?

View 1 Replies View Related

Only Functions And Extended Stored Procedures Can Be Executed From Within A Function. Sp_executesql Is A Extended Stored Prod

May 15, 2008

i have created the folowing function but keep geting an error.

Only functions and extended stored procedures can be executed from within a function.

Why am i getting this error!

Create Function myDateAdd
(@buildd nvarchar(4), @avdate as nvarchar(25))
Returns nvarchar(25)
as
Begin
declare @ret nvarchar(25)
declare @sqlval as nvarchar(3000)

set @sqlval = 'select ''@ret'' = max(realday) from (
select top '+ @buildd +' realday from v_caltable where realday >= '''+ @avdate +''' and prod = 1 )a'

execute sp_executesql @sqlval
return @ret
end

View 3 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved