In my BM_Maps subform, there is a combo box called called Borders. I want the borders to be filtered based on product series, so if the user picks "City Guide", they only get city guide borders, so I have added a table called Product_Series_X_Border which has the product series and border id.
I have a query which joins two tables, and I've ordered it by the border name, which works fine, until I add a where clause for the product series from the other table. I have attached a screengrab which I hope works. I have tried joining other tables but it still doesn't work. Is there any other way I can order by border name with the where clause? I've tested with individual product series as the where clause with the same result.
I have created view by jaoining two table and have order by clause.
The sql generated is as follows
SELECT TOP (100) PERCENT dbo.UWYearDetail.*, dbo.UWYearGroup.* FROM dbo.UWYearDetail INNER JOIN dbo.UWYearGroup ON dbo.UWYearDetail.UWYearGroupId = dbo.UWYearGroup.UWYearGroupId ORDER BY dbo.UWYearDetail.PlanVersionId, dbo.UWYearGroup.UWFinancialPlanSegmentId, dbo.UWYearGroup.UWYear, dbo.UWYearGroup.MandDFlag, dbo.UWYearGroup.EarningsMethod, dbo.UWYearGroup.EffectiveMonth
If I run sql the results are displayed in proper order but the view only order by first item in order by clause.
Has somebody experience same thing? How to fix this issue?
Can someone tell me why SQL seems to ignore my order by clause?I tried to run through the debugger, but the debugger stops at theselect statement line and then returns the result set; so, I have noidea how it is evaluating the order by clause.THANK YOU!CREATE proc sprAllBooks@SortAscend varchar(4),@SortColumn varchar(10)asIf @SortAscend = 'DESC'Select titles.title_id, title, au_lname, au_fname,Convert(varchar(12), pubdate, 101) as PubDatefrom authorsinner jointitleauthoronauthors.au_id = titleauthor.au_idinner jointitlesontitleauthor.title_id = Titles.title_idORDER BY au_lnameCASE @SortColumn WHEN 'title' THEN title END,CASE @SortColumn WHEN 'au_lname' THEN au_lname END,CASE @SortColumn WHEN 'PubDate' THEN PubDate ENDDESCELSESelect titles.title_id, title, au_lname, au_fname,Convert(varchar(12), pubdate, 101) as PubDatefrom authorsinner jointitleauthoronauthors.au_id = titleauthor.au_idinner jointitlesontitleauthor.title_id = Titles.title_idORDER BYCASE @SortColumn WHEN 'title' THEN title END,CASE @SortColumn WHEN 'au_lname' THEN au_lname END,CASE @SortColumn WHEN 'PubDate' THEN PubDate ENDGO
HiI want a simple select query on a column-name (smalldatetime) withvalues dislayed in desc order with null values FIRST.i.e.Select orderdate from ordersorder by ( null values first and then orderdate in desc order)could any one please helpThanks
Table:ColumnsUsersList:UserID, UserName, Country I need a query which select all the rows from the above mentioned table with all fieldsButThe order the rows is First all the users from "Pakistan"Second all the users from rest of the countries except "Pakistan" in ascending order So the query first return all the users from Pakistan and the the users from rest of the world in ascending order. Forexample, 1, ABC, USA2, XYZ, Saudi Arabia3, LMN, Pakistan4, TQR, India5, PTR, Afghanistan then the query returns. 3, LMN, Pakistan5, PTR, Afghanistan4, TQR, India2, XYZ, Saudi Arabia1, ABC, USA
I could write a query with a sub-query in order to perform an UPDATE on the most recent 60,000 records of a table based on a date field, but unfortunately I am receiving an error.
Code: SELECT * FROM DMTM SET transmit_date = '2012-05-07 00:00:00.000', transmit_status = '1223' WHERE temp_pk in
Hi all,Just wondering if anyone can tell me if an order by clause on a selectquery would have any impact on the time it takes to retrieve results?Essentially I'm selecting Top 1 out of a table via various criteriaand currently getting it back without an order by clause. The order bywould only include the column that has the clustered primary index onit.Can anyone tell me if in theory this will slow the query down?Many thanks in advance!Much warmth,Murrau
on executing the below query i am getting the following error
ERROR: Errors in the back-end database access module. Nested table keys in a SHAPE query must be sorted in the same order as the parent table. The nested query may be missing an ORDER BY clause.
even though the order by clause is presenet in the nested query
SELECT t.[ProductId], Predict ([Association].[Product Basket],3) From [Association] PREDICTION JOIN SHAPE { OPENQUERY([Adventure Works Cycle MSCRM], 'SELECT DISTINCT [ProductId] FROM (SELECT ProductId FROM ProductBase) as [Product] ORDER BY [ProductId]')} APPEND ({OPENQUERY([Adventure Works Cycle MSCRM], 'SELECT [ProductId] FROM (SELECT ProductId FROM ProductBase) as [Product] ORDER BY [ProductId]')} RELATE [ProductId] To [ProductId] ) AS [Product] AS t ON [Association].[Product Id] = t.[ProductId] AND [Association].[Product Basket].[Product Id] = t.[Product].[ProductId]
Hi, I wonder if its possible to perform a ORDER BY clause in an SELECT DISTINCT sql query whereby the AS SINGLECOLUMN is used. At present I am recieving error: ORDER BY items must appear in the select list if SELECT DISTINCT is specified. My guess is that I cant perform the Order By clauses because it cant find the columns individually. It is essentail I get this to work somehow... Can anyone help? Thanks in advance Gemma
I am querying a tableA with 1.8 million rows, it has id as its primary key and is a clustered index. I need to select all rows where I order by lastname. Its taking me 45 seconds. Is there anything i can do to optimize the query.Will creating a fulltext index on lastname If so, can you give me an example on how to create a full text index on lastname?
[Project1].[Id] AS [Id], [Project1].[DirectoryId] AS [DirectoryId], [Project1].[SPI] AS [SPI], [Project1].[FirstName] AS [FirstName], [Project1].[LastName] AS [LastName], [Project1].[NPI] AS [NPI], [Project1].[AddressLine1] AS [AddressLine1], [Project1].[AddressLine2] AS [AddressLine2],
insert into test_sort values('Non-A'); insert into test_sort values('Non-O'); insert into test_sort values('Noni'); insert into test_sort values('Nons');
then execute the following selects: select * from test_sort order by cast( 1 as nvarchar(75));
select * from test_sort order by cast( description as nvarchar(75));
It's a very strange thing! I havea a table called invoices, and a table calle customer payments which has the invoiceID of the payment.
I have many invoices that haven't been paid (so they don't have a record on the customer payments). I know this, as i can for example do: select * from invoices where invoiceID = 302247 (and i'll get one result) select * from customer_payments where invoice = 302247 (and i'll get none results)
however, if i do the following: select * from invoices where invoice_id not in (select invoice_id from customer_payments) I get nothing!!!???
It doesn't make any sense, as I should get at least 300 (including the 302247) - both invoiceids fields are int... so i just don't understand what's wrong?
For each customer, I want to add all of their telephone numbers to a different column. That is, multiple columns (depending on the number of telephone numbers) for each customer/row. How can I achieve that?
I want my output to be
CUSTOMER ID, FIRST NAME, LAST NAME, TEL1, TEL2, TEL3, ... etc
Each 'Tel' will relate to a one or more records in the PHONES table that is linked back to the customer.
Hi All, Can somebosy help with this dilema in my where clause I've got the followingWHERE (Customers.Owner = ISNULL(@Contract,Customers.Owner)) AND (Workorders.DateReceived = ISNULL(@DateReceived,Workorders.DateReceived)) AND (Workorders.DateRequired = ISNULL(@DateRequired,Workorders.DateRequired)) AND (Workorders.EngineerID = ISNULL(@EngineerID,Workorders.EngineerID)) AND (Workorders.DateFinished = ISNULL(@DateFinished,Workorders.DateFinished)) AND (Workorders.JobTypeID = ISNULL(@JobTypeID,Workorders.JobTypeID)) AND (Workorders.JobStatus = ISNULL(@JobStatus,Workorders.JobStatus)) AND (Workorders.PriorityID = ISNULL(@PriorityID,Workorders.PriorityID)) This is so if one of the parameters passed is null you still get a result is trouble is if the substitute value of the ISNULL statement is null no result is shown how can I get round this. Any help much appreciated
the select statement in the join orders the numbers asc and if you run everything below the case statement it works, but as you run the whole thing the order is no longer there.
I need the order to work. What am I missing?
--Assign Intern's students
Update tblObjectType3_14 Set [FldNumeric23764]= case when tID = 1 and Q.n <= 100 then 2 when tID = 2 and Q.n <= 150 then 2 when tID = 3 and Q.n <= 150 then 2 when tID = 4 and Q.n <= 130 then 2
Hello all,The followinq qurey returns sometimes values of null to some of this columns, byK,byT,byD. the column F wil not contains any nulls, and 0 will be populated in it at any case of .Now, the problem is that when sorting out F the sort will not work when there is null parameters in byK because teh fact that a 0 values is greater then NULL value, and the sort of F will not take in considiration. So I guess the question is how can I sort NULL values and 0 values to be the same weight in the sort by command? SELECT A.gym_id as gym,s_id, week, gym_name, boxer, league, sum(points) points,sum(byK)as byK, sum(byT) as byT,sum(byPoints) as byPoints , sum(byD) as byD, count(C.gym) as F FROM A inner JOIN B ON A.gym_id = B.gym_id left JOIN C ON A.gym_id = C.gym WHERE (B.l_id = ?text group by A.gym_id order by points DESC,byK DESC,byT DESC, byPoints DESC, byD DESC,F ASC
I'm getting this "invalid descriptor index" exception while trying to fetch a record from the table. The query is "select * from <tablename> where <columnname> = 'xyz'". The column name is correct and indeed a record with 'xyz' value exists. The record is getting fetched too...! But I'm having this particular error while trying to retrieve a couple of fields with rs.getString(). The order of columns in the table is same as the order in which I'm retrieving them. And I'm not facing any problem retrieving another field which has width of 200 characters. I'll be very grateful indeed if someone can help me out of this particular problem...
The ORDER BY clause can include items that do not appear in the select list. However, if SELECT DISTINCT is specified, or if the statement contains a GROUP BY clause, or if the SELECT statement contains a UNION operator, the sort columns must appear in the select list.
If I use the order by clause to sort on a date, where the date andtime stamp are the exact same for multiple records, how does SQLoutput the data?At random... or does it look at the primary key?
Hello,Ive got a column which stores integers ranging from 0-200. I need to order them so that 1 is first, and 0 is last like 1,2,2,3,4,6,8....98....0,0,0My Order By clause statement looks like 'ORDER BY column_name', but obviously this will put the '0' records at the top. Is there a way around this?Thanks, Curt.
The following SELECT query gives me a list of 50 plus countries. How do I order them by 'United States' First (happens to be ID 225) and then alphabetical? SELECT Country_ID, Country_Long FROM Countries WHERE isIndustrial = 1 ORDER BY Country_Long
Hi! I think the order by clause is driving me crazy.The following T-SQL query works: SELECT count(*) AS c From F_POST Where id=@id Order by c Ok, so far so good, but in the following case it is NOT possible to order the result set according to "count(*)": Select T_Date AS TDATE, count(*) AS c From F_Post Where id=@id Order By case when @OrderBy = 1 then c elseT_DATE DESC This is just strange since it is essentially the same query!? Furthermore, it seems to be inpossible to have a order-by-clause that looks like: Order By case when @OrderBy = 1 then T_Column1 ASC elseT_Column2 DESC
Does anyone know how I can implement querys that do (almost) exactly this what the last 2 querys "should" to do?
like so often my Forums database design (in its simplest form) is:Forums -ForumID -Title -CategoryForumsMsgs -fmID -DateIn -AuthorID -MessageI need to create a sql query which returns all forum titles along with some data for 1) the first message entry (date created and author) and 2) the last one. So how can I do a JOIN query which joins with a ORDER BY clause so that the top/bottom entry only is joined from the messages table?
When I say to sort on a datetime field on descending order, the date is sorted. However, the time difference is not reflected in the results. Any way, we can fix it. i.e. If I have two records with the same dates but different times, the sorting order is not considering the time.
I am trying to pass as an input parameter a user selected order by clause, and instead of repeating the SQL statement with a new Order By based on the parameter, I want to set the Order by using this parameter. I can't get it to work.
IF @StartDate = 'ALL DATES' BEGIN SELECT @MinDate = Min(AccessTime) FROM tblAudit END ELSE BEGIN SELECT @MinDate = @StartDate END
IF @EndDate = 'ALL DATES' BEGIN SELECT @MaxDate = Max(AccessTime) FROM tblAudit END ELSE BEGIN SELECT @MaxDate = @StartDate END
BEGIN SELECT tblReports.ReportName, tblReports.ReportCode, tblAudit.BadAttempts, tblAudit.LogonUser, tblAudit.AccessTime, tblAudit.RemoteHost, tblAudit.RemoteIdent, tblAudit.ExitTime, tblAudit.BrowserType, tblAudit.Access_ID, TotalTime=DateDiff(Minute,tblAudit.AccessTime,tblA udit.ExitTime) FROM tblReports INNER JOIN tblReportsAccess ON tblReports.Report_ID = tblReportsAccess.Report_ID INNER JOIN tblAudit ON tblReportsAccess.Audit_ID = tblAudit.Audit_ID WHERE tblAudit.AccessTime >= @MinDate AND tblAudit.AccessTime <= @MaxDate ORDER BY (SELECT 'ColumnName'=ColumnName FROM tblOrderBy WHERE ColumnName = @OrderBy) END
I have a query that returns several ordered rows where one of the fields in the ORDER BY clause is a date field (DueDate) that we use to see the most pressing deadline first. The problem is that the default value in that field (which other code translates to mean no due date) is 1/1/1900. That means that items with no due date show up before today's import deadline. I can see one potential solution where I join my results on the original table where DueDate>1/1/1900 and then back to my results so I can use an ISNULL() on the field to set a value in the future (like 1/1/9999), but that seems like a really nasty wrong round-about way to do it. I think there has to be something better.
I have a a grid (Fig-1) where i have LineID and corresponding RankValue. I want to sort out the Grid like (Fig-2) where It will be sorted based on Rank Value(Higher to lower) but LineID group should maintain. I am using SqlServer 2008.
Need to pass column to ORDER BY as parameter in sp (possible 8 columns out of total 30). Is there a way to do it avoiding dynamic SQL use(will be used frequently)?
I'm currently have a problem with a query using a top clause. When I run it by itself as a single query, I have no problems and the results are valid. However, if I try duplicate the query after a union clause, the order by ... desc doesn't order properly.
The following is the query I'm using along with the results. Then I'll have the query I was trying to unite and the results (date ranges selected were the same in both):
QUERY 1
select top 1 (s.ldate), v.mdtid, po.odometer, pi.odometer, (pi.odometer-po.odometer) as 'Total Miles'
from EventStrings ES
JOIN schedules s ON ES.SchId=S.SchId JOIN vehicles v ON v.vehicleid=es.vehicleid JOIN Events PO ON PO.schid=es.schid AND PO.EvStrId=ES.EvStrId AND po.activity=4 JOIN Events PI ON PI.schid=es.schid AND PI.EvStrId=ES.EvStrId AND pi.activity=3
WHERE es.providerid in (0,1,4) and s.ldate>=? and s.ldate<=? and v.mdtid=20411
order by s.ldate desc
RESULTS 1
DATE MDT IDPU Odometer DO Odometer Total Miles 12/6/2007 2041112810.6 12874.5 63.9
QUERY 2 (with Union)
select top 1 (s.ldate), v.mdtid, po.odometer, pi.odometer, (pi.odometer-po.odometer) as 'Total Miles'
from EventStrings ES
JOIN schedules s ON ES.SchId=S.SchId JOIN vehicles v ON v.vehicleid=es.vehicleid JOIN Events PO ON PO.schid=es.schid AND PO.EvStrId=ES.EvStrId AND po.activity=4 JOIN Events PI ON PI.schid=es.schid AND PI.EvStrId=ES.EvStrId AND pi.activity=3
WHERE es.providerid in (0,1,4) and s.ldate>=[From Date,Date] and s.ldate<=[To Date,Date] and v.mdtid=20411
Union
select top 1 (s.ldate), v.mdtid, po.odometer, pi.odometer, (pi.odometer-po.odometer) as 'Total Miles'
from EventStrings ES
JOIN schedules s ON ES.SchId=S.SchId JOIN vehicles v ON v.vehicleid=es.vehicleid JOIN Events PO ON PO.schid=es.schid AND PO.EvStrId=ES.EvStrId AND po.activity=4 JOIN Events PI ON PI.schid=es.schid AND PI.EvStrId=ES.EvStrId AND pi.activity=3
WHERE es.providerid in (0,1,4) and s.ldate>=? and s.ldate<=? and v.mdtid=2642
order by s.ldate desc
RESULTS 2
DATE MDT ID PU OdometerDO Odometer Total Miles 4/10/2007 20411 1207.21252.5 45.3 1/2/2007 2642 193652.6193817 164.4
As you can see, the results are sorted very differently. Is there any way to have the order by apply to both queries?
Hi, Im using a select query in which im using order by clause on a column which is varchar. Im getting wrong result on using the query, the result output is below
