I need to execute 10 stored procedures one after the other in a sequence,but need to roll back if any one of them fails and discontinue further execution.Example: if sp#3 fails it should roll back alll the changes made by sp# 1 and sp# 2 and also should not continue executing the rest of them. Any ideas?
Thanks.
Seems like I'm stealing all the threads here, : But I need to learn :) I have a StoredProcedure that needs to return values that other StoredProcedures return.Rather than have my DataAccess layer access the DB multiple times, I would like to call One stored Procedure, and have that stored procedure call the others to get the information I need. I think this way would be more efficient than accessing the DB multiple times. One of my SP is:SELECT I.ItemDetailID, I.ItemDetailStatusID, I.ItemDetailTypeID, I.Archived, I.Expired, I.ExpireDate, I.Deleted, S.Name AS 'StatusName', S.ItemDetailStatusID, S.InProgress as 'StatusInProgress', S.Color AS 'StatusColor',T.[Name] AS 'TypeName', T.Prefix, T.Name AS 'ItemDetailTypeName', T.ItemDetailTypeID FROM [Item].ItemDetails I INNER JOIN Item.ItemDetailStatus S ON I.ItemDetailStatusID = S.ItemDetailStatusID INNER JOIN [Item].ItemDetailTypes T ON I.ItemDetailTypeID = T.ItemDetailTypeID However, I already have StoredProcedures that return the exact same data from the ItemDetailStatus table and ItemDetailTypes table.Would it be better to do it above, and have more code to change when a new column/field is added, or more checks, or do something like:(This is not propper SQL) SELECT I.ItemDetailID, I.ItemDetailStatusID, I.ItemDetailTypeID, I.Archived, I.Expired, I.ExpireDate, I.Deleted, EXEC [Item].ItemDetailStatusInfo I.ItemDetailStatusID, EXEC [Item].ItemDetailTypeInfo I.ItemDetailTypeID FROM [Item].ItemDetails IOr something like that... Any thoughts?
View 3 Replies View Relatedi have a procedure like below but it dosen't return any tableSELECT Hardwares.HWID, Hardwares.Title
FROM Hardwares INNER JOIN
Category ON Hardwares.CategoryID = Category.CategoryID
WHERE (Category.Type LIKE '%Hardware%') AND (Category.Title = @Title)
I apologize for the length of this message, but I think I need to include all this info so that the problem is understood. I am having what appears to be a problem capturing the return code from a failed BCP.
I create a stored proc to use BCP to load a table:
create procedure sp_bcp_load as
declare @RC int
execute @RC = master..xp_cmdshell "bcp JON..W4KPV in e:inetpubftprootfinreslaw4kpv.g4000.data /Sdbmtss1 /m 0 /f d:mssqluserdatafinresW4KPV.fmt /Usa /P /e d:mssqluserdatafinrescp1.err /t""|"" /r "
select 'Return code from bcp = ', @RC
if @RC <> 0
BEGIN
print 'BCP Error.'
return (8)
END
GO
If I execute the SP, and encounter a transaction log full error, the return code is still zero:
1000 rows sent to SQL Server. 45000 total
1000 rows sent to SQL Server. 46000 total
Msg 1105, Level 17, State 2:
Server 'DBMTSS1', Line 1:
Can't allocate space for object 'Syslogs' in database 'Jon' because
the 'logsegment' segment is full. If you ran out of space in Syslogs,
dump the transaction log. Otherwise, use ALTER DATABASE or sp_extendsegment to increase the size of the segment.
(54 row(s) affected)
----------------------- -----------
Return code from bcp = 0
If I execute the SP again, it correctly returns a non-zero value:
Msg 1105, Level 17, State 2:
Server 'DBMTSS1', Line 1:
Can't allocate space for object 'Syslogs' in database 'Jon' because
the 'logsegment' segment is full. If you ran out of space in Syslogs, dump the transaction log. Otherwise, use ALTER DATABASE or sp_extendsegment to increase the size of the segment.
(6 row(s) affected)
----------------------- -----------
Return code from bcp = 1
(1 row(s) affected)
BCP Error.
Does anybody have an idea why this behaves this way? Any suggestions on how to trap an error on the first call?
Thanks,
Jon Carter
I need to somehow filter the results of my stored procedure to return the distinct "OrderNum" values. I'm using SQL database and I'm look for a way to alter the results from the stored procedure. My stored procedure rptOpenOrderLines currently returns all invoices (items under a OrderNum). I want to somehow filter those results to return one and only one of those "OrderNum" variables from the invoices. The tricky part is that I need to somehow find a way to do this without going into my database and directly altering the SQL stored procedure. I would be happy for any recommendations/ideas. Thanks!
View 3 Replies View RelatedHi all, if have problem to display error message in vb.net that comes from a stored procedure. IF ...... then msgbox "ERROR at Update" returnvalue = SUCCES ELSE Msgbox "Successfull Updated" returnvalue = ERROREND IFHow can I return values from Stored Procedure to VB.NET and then give to User a Message that the Update was successful or not.Thanks to all
View 2 Replies View Relatedhello. I am trying to speed up my asp.net caledar.
I need a Stored Procedure that takes a Parameter.
the Parameter will be a Date.
then I want sql server to return all the classes that will happen on that date in formated string so i can display in the Asp.net caledar.
the table looks like this
classid
classname
classdate
classtime
(there are more than one class happening on the same day)
I need the retuen value to look like this
"Yoga 9:00am" & "<p>" & "Jazz 11:00am" & <p>
can someone help me or point me to a sample. this is really hard. thank you
How to return multiple values from stored procedures to reports in sql server 2005
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am trying to execute a simple SELECT statement in a stored procedure from within Visual Studio 2005. The procedure executes but returns no rows. (There are rows in the table and a VIEW using the same SELECT statement does return the rows.)
I added a PRINT statement to the stored procedure to see if it executed and it did print my text in the output window as expected.
The SQL server is running on Windows Server 2003 with latest service packs and patches. I had detached the database while doing maintenance on our system and re-attached it later.
I can not find any reason why it refuses to return rows.
Larry
hi
i read that stored procedures can return multiple result sets?how is that?
thanks in advance.
Hello,
This is my foray into Stored procedures, so I'm hoping this is a fairly basic question.
I'm writing a stored procedure, in which I dynamically create an SQL statement.
At the end of this, the SQL statement reads like:
Code SnippetSELECT COUNT(*) FROM StockLedger WHERE StockCode = 'STOCK1' AND IsOpen = 1 AND SizeCode = 'L' AND ColourCode = 'RED' AND LocationCode IS NULL AND RemainingQty > 0
Now this statement works a charm, and returns a single value. I want to assign this count to a variable, and use it further on in the stored procedure. This is where the problems start - I cant seem to do it.
If I hard code a statement, like
Code SnippetSELECT @LineCount = COUNT(*) FROM StockLedger
that works fine (although it brings back a count of all the lines).
But if I modify the dynamically created SQL Statement from earlier on to:
Code SnippetSELECT @LineCount = COUNT(*) FROM StockLedger WHERE StockCode = 'STOCK1' AND IsOpen = 1 AND SizeCode = 'L' AND ColourCode = 'RED' AND LocationCode IS NULL AND RemainingQty > 0
it doesnt work - it complains: Must declare the scalar variable "@LineCount".
Just to clarify, when I say "dynamically created an SQL statement, I mean that by a bunch of conditional statements I populate a varchar variable with the statement, and then eventually run it exec(@SQLStatementString)
So, my question would be, how do I do this? How do I make a dynamically generated SQL statement return a value to a variable?
Hi all,
I have one application through which i m installing SQL Server 2005 Express Edition.
If some failure occures, all I get is one exitCode which is a return code of SQL Express installer. Is there any way by which I can find out the exact reason of failure.
One example is error code 28062.
This error code is for "sql is unable to install on compressed folder / drive".
Please help
Thanks and regards,
-Anup
Hi.here is my code with my problem described in the syntax.I am using asp.net 1.1 and VB.NETThanks in advance for your help.I am still a beginner and I know that your time is precious. I would really appreciate it if you could "fill" my example function with the right code that returns the new ID of the newly inserted row.
Public Function howToReturnID(ByVal aCompany As String, ByVal aName As String) As Integer
'that is the variable for the new id.Dim intNewID As Integer
Dim strSQL As String = "INSERT INTO tblAnfragen(aCompany, aName)" & _ "VALUES (@aCompany, @aName); SELECT @NewID = @@identity"
Dim dbConnection As SqlConnection = New SqlConnection(connectionString)Dim dbCommand As SqlCommand = New SqlCommand()dbCommand.CommandText = strSQL
'Here is my problem.'What do I have to do in order to add the parameter @NewID and'how do I read and return the value of @NewID within that function howToReturnID'any help is greatly appreciated!'I cannot use SPs in this application - have to do it this way! :-(
dbCommand.Parameters.Add("@aFirma", aCompany.Trim)dbCommand.Parameters.Add("@aAnsprAnrede", aName.Trim)
dbCommand.Connection = dbConnection
TrydbConnection.Open()dbCommand.ExecuteNonQuery()
'here i want to return the new ID!Return intNewID
Catch ex As Exception
Throw New System.Exception("Error: " & ex.Message.ToString())
Finally
dbCommand.Dispose()dbConnection.Close()dbConnection.Dispose()
End Try
End Function
Table1 contains a CODES column which may store multiple codes separated by commas.
The descriptions for these codes are stored individually in a column in in Table2.
I would like to return the descriptions from Table2 in the same format as the codes from Table1.
Table1 Stores multiple codes per ID in a single column.
ID CODES
-- --------------
01 Code1,Code2,Code3
Table2 Stores the definitions for the codes in Table1
CODE DESCRIPTION
----- ---------------
Code1 Description1
Code2 Description2
Code3 Description3
The tables are what the tables are. Here is what I am trying to accomplish:
ID CODES DESCRIPTIONS
-- ----------------- --------------------------------------
01 Code1,etc Description1,Description2,Description3
I've found two different queries which return each code and associated description by ID in separate rows. Perhaps the next step is to aggregate from this?
I have a procedure that calls other procedures which in turn call other procedures. I have a transaction in the first procedure since I want to rollback everything done if something goes wrong except for rows inserted in a loggtable in my database. The reason for this is that all error shall be saved in this table, otherwise there is no way to find out what error occured.
How do you solve this?
I want to know the differences between SQL Server 2000 storedprocedures and oracle stored procedures? Do they have differentsyntax? The concept should be the same that the stored proceduresexecute in the database server with better performance?Please advise good references for Oracle stored procedures also.thanks!!
View 11 Replies View Related
I have a package that I have been attempting to return a error code after the stored procedure executes, otherwise the package works great.
I call the stored procedure from a Execute SQL Task (execute Marketing_extract_history_load_test ?, ? OUTPUT)
The sql task rowset is set to NONE. It is a OLEB connection.
I have two parameters mapped:
tablename input varchar 0 (this variable is set earlier in a foreach loop) ADO.
returnvalue output long 1
I set the breakpoint and see the values change, but I have a OnFailure conditon set if it returns a failure. The failure is ignored and the package completes. No quite what I wanted.
The first part of the sp is below and I set the value @i and return.
CREATE procedure [dbo].[Marketing_extract_history_load_TEST]
@table_name varchar(200),
@i int output
as
Why is it not capturing and setting the error and execute my OnFailure code? I have tried setting one of my parameter mappings to returnvalue with no success.
Hi,
This Might be a really simple thing, however we have just installed SQL server 2005 on a new server, and are having difficulties with the set up of the Store Procedures. Every time we try to modify an existing stored procedure it attempts to save it as an SQL file, unlike in 2000 where it saved it as part of the database itself.
Thank you in advance for any help on this matter
Hi all,
In my SQL Server Management Studio Express (SSMSE), I executed the following sql code suuccessfully:
--insertNewRocord.sql--
USE shcDB
GO
CREATE PROC sp_insertNewRecord @procPersonID int,
@procFirstName nvarchar(20),
@procLastName nvarchar(20),
@procAddress nvarchar(50),
@procCity nvarchar(20),
@procState nvarchar(20),
@procZipCode nvarchar(20),
@procEmail nvarchar(50)
AS INSERT INTO MyFriends
VALUES (@procPersonID, @procFirstName, @procLastName, @procAddress,
@procCity, @procState, @procZipCode, @procEmail)
GO
EXEC sp_insertNewRecord 7, 'Peter', 'Wang', '678 Old St', 'Detroit',
'Michigon', '67899', 'PeterWang@yahoo.com'
GO
=======================================================================
Now, I want to insert a new record into the dbo.Friends table of my shcDB by executing the following T-SQL and Visual Basic 2005 codes that are programmed in a VB2005 Express project "CallshcDBspWithAdoNet":
--Form1.vb--
Imports System.Data
Imports System.Data.SqlClient
Imports System.Data.SqlTypes
Public Class Form1
Public Sub InsertNewFriend()
Dim connectionString As String = "Integrated Security-SSPI;Persist Security Info=False;" + _
"Initial Catalog=shcDB;Data Source=.SQLEXPRESS"
Dim connection As SqlConnection = New SqlConnection(connectionString)
connection.Open()
Try
Dim command As SqlCommand = New SqlCommand("sp_InsertNewRecord", connection)
command.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure
EXEC sp_insertNewRecord 6, 'Craig', 'Utley', '5577 Baltimore Ave',
'Ellicott City', 'MD', '21045', 'CraigUtley@yahoo.com'
Console.WriteLine("Row inserted: " + _
command.ExecuteNonQuery().ToString)
Catch ex As Exception
Console.WriteLine(ex.Message)
Throw
Finally
connection.Close()
End Try
End Sub
End Class
===========================================================
I ran the above project in VB 2005 Express and I got the following 5 errors:
1. Name 'EXEC' is not declared (in Line 16 of Form1.vb)
2. Method arguments must be enclosed in parentheses (in Line 16 of Form1.vb)
3. Name 'sd-insertNewRecord' is not declared. (in Line 16 of Form1.vb)
4.Comma, ')', or a valid expression continuation expected (in Line 16 of Form1.vb)
5. Expression expected (in Line 16 of Form1.vb)
============================================================
I know that "EXEC sp_insertNewRecord 6, 'Craig', 'Utley', '5577 Baltimore Ave',
'Ellicott City', 'MD', '21045', 'CraigUtley@yahoo.com' "in Line 16 of Form1.vb is grossly in error.
But I am new in doing the programming of T-SQL in VB 2005 Express and I am not able to change it.
Please help and advise me how to correct these problems.
Thanks in advance,
Scott Chang
Hi Jonathan Kehayias, Thanks for your valuable response.
I had a hard time to sumbit my reply in that original thread yesterday. So I created this new thread.
Here is my response to the last code/instruction you gave me:
I corrected a small mistake (on Integrated Security-SSPI and executed the last code you gave me.
I got the following debug error message:
1) A Box appeared and said: String or binary data would be truncated.
The statement has been terminated.
|OK|
2) After I clicked on the |OK| button, the following message appeared:
This "SqlException was unhandled
String or binary data would be truncated.
The statement has been terminated."
is pointing to the "Throw" code statement in the middle of
.......................................
Catch ex As Exception
MessageBox.Show(ex.Message)
Throw
Finally
..........
Please help and advise how to correct this problem in my project that is executed in my VB 2005 Express-SQL Server Management Studio Express PC.
Thanks,
Scott Chang
The code of my Form1.vb is listed below:
Imports System.Data
Imports System.Data.SqlClient
Imports System.Data.SqlTypes
Public Class Form1
Public Sub InsertNewFriend()
Dim connectionString As String = "Data Source=.SQLEXPRESS;Initial Catalog=shcDB;Integrated Security=SSPI;"
Dim connection As SqlConnection = New SqlConnection(connectionString)
Try
connection.Open()
Dim command As SqlCommand = New SqlCommand("sp_insertNewRecord", connection)
command.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure
command.Parameters.Add("@procPersonID", SqlDbType.Int).Value = 7
command.Parameters.Add("@procFirstName", SqlDbType.NVarChar).Value = "Craig"
command.Parameters.Add("@procLastName", SqlDbType.NVarChar).Value = "Utley"
command.Parameters.Add("@procAddress", SqlDbType.NVarChar).Value = "5577 Baltimore Ave"
command.Parameters.Add("@procCity", SqlDbType.NVarChar).Value = "Ellicott City"
command.Parameters.Add("@procState", SqlDbType.NVarChar).Value = "MD"
command.Parameters.Add("@procZipCode", SqlDbType.NVarChar).Value = "21045"
command.Parameters.Add("@procEmail", SqlDbType.NVarChar).Value = "CraigUtley@yahoo.com"
Dim resulting As String = command.ExecuteNonQuery
MessageBox.Show("Row inserted: " + resulting)
Catch ex As Exception
MessageBox.Show(ex.Message)
Throw
Finally
connection.Close()
End Try
End Sub
Private Sub Form1_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles MyBase.Load
InsertNewFriend()
End Sub
End Class
Hi everyone,
I don't specify the following statements in SP.
begin transaction
commit transaction
rollback
In sp, there are a lot of insert and update. If i execute SP and stop it in half way. will it rollback all update and insert statement? also, will it rollback if it fails?
cheers
Does anybody knows How does the rollback data stored in SQL 2005?
For example I am inserting 100 new rows into a table, so how does SQL keeps track of them as new rows which are yet to be committed?
Internally does SQL has any indexing to recognise the data which is not yet committed? Can we also write some queries on the table which will fetch us the non-committed insertions on the table?
If you have any clue about how does SQL 2005 handles this Rollback/Commit functions internally pls explain.
Regards,
Jacob
Hi guys, I want to know if it is possible to retrieve the fieldnames that a
Stored Procedure return, without executing this StoreProc.
Thank you
Hi all, I have a program that needs to delete records, then re-insert new records to a table. But I need to rollback the transaction IF the insert is not success (error occured). The delete and insert are in 2 difference stored procedure (which have rollback transaction) that calling from 1 stored procedure. My problem is that if Insert is not successful, but the records already deleted previously. How can we rollback the delete transaction when insert is not successful?
Note: if possible, I don't want to delete the records AFTER the insert is successful, or create a temp table to stored the deleted records
=======================================
create stored procedure combine_sp
as
begin
call delete_sp -- have rollback transaction in the delete_sp
-- what to do if following has error occured, but we already deleted the records above?
call insert_sp -- have rollback transaction in the insert_sp
end
go
=======================================
Thanks a lot.
create proc proc1 (@param1 int)
as
begin try
declare @param2 int
begin transaction
exec proc2 @param2
commit transaction
end try
begin catch
if @@trancount > 0
rollback transaction
end catch
i haven't had an opportunity to do this before. I have nested stored proc and both inserts values into different tables. To maintain atomicity i want to be able to rollback everything if an error occurs in the inner or outer stored procedure.
Using SQL 2005, SP2. All of a sudden, whenever I create any stored procedures in the master database, they get created as system stored procedures. Doesn't matter what I name them, and what they do.
For example, even this simple little guy:
CREATE PROCEDURE BOB
AS
PRINT 'BOB'
GO
Gets created as a system stored procedure.
Any ideas what would cause that and/or how to fix it?
Thanks,
Jason
In general as understand if we have a stored procedure that does operations like inserts or updates, it makes perfect sense to use a rollback operation within a transaction.
So, if something goes wrong and the transaction does not complete, all changes will be reverted and an error description will be thrown for example.
Nevertheless, does using a rollback within a try catch statement, make sense in a read only stored procedure, that practically executes some dynamic sql just to select data from some tables?
I have around 100 Stored procedures, all of them read only. Today a colleague suggested adding try-catch blocks with rollback to all of them. But since they are just selecting data, I don't see a clear benefit of doing so, compared to the hassle of changing such a big number of SP's.
Hi,
I am using sql2k5. I just wanted to throw an error from stored procedure with some message to C# to rollback my transaction.
Here is how i wnated to do ( in sequence )
C#
=====
Open a connection
Begin the transaction
Execute the command
In the Stored Proc
===========
do multiple operations one by one
if error
stop processing further
Throw the error
C#
========
if exception
rollback the transaction
else
commit the transaction
I have tried using raise error in stored proc but never thrown exception
Can any one let me know how to achieve this scenario??
~Mohan Babu
I have a stored procedure that selects the unique Name of an item from one table.
SELECT DISTINCT ChainName from Chains
For each ChainName, there exists 0 or more StoreNames in the Stores. I want to return the result of this select as the second field in each row of the result set.
SELECT DISTINCT StoreName FROM Stores WHERE Stores.ChainName = ChainName
Each row of the result set returned by the stored procedure would contain:
ChainName, Array of StoreNames (or comma separated strings or whatever)
How can I code a stored procedure to do this?
How do I search for and print all stored procedure names in a particular database? I can use the following query to search and print out all table names in a database. I just need to figure out how to modify the code below to search for stored procedure names. Can anyone help me out?
SELECT TABLE_SCHEMA + '.' + TABLE_NAME
FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES
WHERE TABLE_TYPE = 'BASE TABLE'
Greetings:
I have MSSQL 2005. On earlier versions of MSSQL saving a stored procedure wasn't a confusing action. However, every time I try to save my completed stored procedure (parsed successfully ) I'm prompted to save it as a query on the hard drive.
How do I cause the 'Save' action to add the new stored procedure to my database's list of stored procedures?
Thanks!
We recently upgraded to SQL Server 2005. We had several stored procedures in the master database and, rather than completely rewriting a lot of code, we just recreated these stored procedures in the new master database.
For some reason, some of these stored procedures are getting stored as "System Stored Procedures" rather than just as "Stored Procedures". Queries to sys.Objects and sys.Procedures shows that these procs are being saved with the is_ms_shipped field set to 1, even though they obviously were not shipped with the product.
I can't update the sys.Objects or sys.Procedures views in 2005.
What effect will this flag (is_ms_shipped = 1) have on my stored procedures?
Can I move these out of "System Stored Procedures" and into "Stored Procedures"?
Thanks!
Hello friends......How are you ? I want to ask you all that how can I do the following ?
I want to now that how many ways are there to do this ?
How can I call one or more stored procedures into perticular one Stored Proc ? in MS SQL Server 2000/05.