I have a column that has multiple word delimited by a space or comma such as:
crime horror love
I want to perform a query so that a search for one of these words returns the record. THis is what I have so far:
SELECT columnname
FROM tablename
WHERE columnname LIKE 'strSearchVar'
This only returns records with one word in the column that matches. it ignores columns with multiple words.
thanks!
Hi,
I want to search multiple words that is present in the database, e.g if i am putting "porperty in south delhi" but south word is in the data base, but result does not comes. if I use like operator like this select * from MASTERSEARCH where companyname like '" + txt_Company.Text + "%' or dealsin like '%" + txt_keywords + "%'";Here I put only south word, then result comes. but I want search criteria should be any word that is present in the database.I am using this with my web site. http://www.b2bindialinks.com
Hi,I'd be interested in people's thoughts about the following. A user on my site will be searching for a venue name, and that could officially include a sponsor which the user might not search for. Now I am using the AutoCompleteDropdown from the AJAX Control Toolkit, so the user will start typing in a few characters and the results will be returned. I can generate the results from sql by doing a simple LIKE '%' + @searchTerm + '%' however, this fills me with great fear of table scans. At the moment, we'd be querying against a table of 5K records, but our application is very new.I'm thinking one option is to split the words into another table - a one to many relationship to hold each word of the venue. The benefit of this would be that you could do a:LIKE @term + '%'but then I have the cost of the join. (And the added complexity which is not a major issue)Any thoughts/tips?Thanks!
View 1 Replies View RelatedMy scenario is I have a web form with a textbox and a button.Once I enter a string and hit submit button, my stored procedure will have to return the result set.So if my search string is "text book title", then I have to execute the query like :select * from tab1 where col1 like '%text%" or col1 like '%book%" or col1 like '%title%"The problem here is I will never know how many words will be entered to search. So I have to make the statement dynamic.How can I do this in a stored procedure? Any help will be appreciated.Thanks.
View 6 Replies View RelatedHi,
for some reason, i had to write a function to count the number of words in a particular column in a table. (pl find the attachment). i would like to know whether there is any other mechanism with which we can count the number of words in a particular column.
for example, if the column data is,'This Is A Test', the function, will return 4.
pl suggest any other efficient strategies to accomplish this
thanks
How can I pull words out of a column and return as a row?
column1 column2
12345 the#quick#brown#fox
12346 mmm#turkey
-result set
column1 column2
12345 the
12345 quick
12345 brown
12345 fox
12346 mmm
12346 turkey
hi, i have varchar(8000) only acceptsin my colimn.is there any possiblity to insert 10000 words in my row? i am using sqlserver2000. can any one please help me
View 5 Replies View RelatedHi there,
I'm trying to recreate a MS-SQL database in MySQL. One particular table has a column names "Precision", a reserved word in MySQL. I woudl really prefer to keep this name if possible as it will be referenced in all sorts of places. I've tried single and double quotes, that didn't work.
Is it possible to use reserveds word as column names? How?
cheers
Here we go,
I have a great question for all of you.
What is the problem in using reserved words in table columns name? Any one have a compeling reason not to use?
Here is an exemple:
/ ******** Table ********/
Entity
EntityId
Name
When you query this table you should use the [ ] like this:
SELECT EntityId,[Name] FROM Entity
Anyone have any objection to this, with actual facts?
The question why use this?
This about the programing object in C#
Entity oneEntity = new Entity();
oneEntity.Name = "Test Entity";
It could be:
oneEntity.EntityName = "Test Entity";
Any one???
Please can anyone help me for the following?
I want to merge multiple rows (eg. 3rows) into a single row with multip columns.
for eg:
data
Date Shift Reading
01-MAR-08 1 879.880
01-MAR-08 2 854.858
01-MAR-08 3 833.836
02-MAR-08 1 809.810
02-MAR-08 2 785.784
02-MAR-08 3 761.760
i want output for the above as:
Date Shift1 Shift2 Shift3
01-MAR-08 879.880 854.858 833.836
02-MAR-08 809.810 785.784 761.760
Please help me.
I need to update multiple columns in a table with multiple condition.
For example, this is my Query
update Table1
set weight= d.weight,
stateweight=d.stateweight,
overallweight=d.overallweight
from
(select * from table2)d
where table1.state=d.state and
table1.month=d.month and
table1.year=d.year
If table matches all the three column (State,month,year), it should update only weight column and if it matches(state ,year) it should update only the stateweight column and if it matches(year) it should update only the overallweight column
I can't write an update query for each condition separately because its a huge select
Hi,
I have multiple columns in a Single Table and i want to search values in different columns. My table structure is
col1 (identity PK)
col2 (varchar(max))
col3 (varchar(max))
I have created a single FULLTEXT on col2 & col3.
suppose i want to search col2='engine' and col3='toyota' i write query as
SELECT
TBL.col2,TBL.col3
FROM
TBL
INNER JOIN
CONTAINSTABLE(TBL,col2,'engine') TBL1
ON
TBL.col1=TBL1.[key]
INNER JOIN
CONTAINSTABLE(TBL,col3,'toyota') TBL2
ON
TBL.col1=TBL2.[key]
Every thing works well if database is small. But now i have 20 million records in my database. Taking an exmaple there are 5million record with col2='engine' and only 1 record with col3='toyota', it take substantial time to find 1 record.
I was thinking this i can address this issue if i merge both columns in a Single column, but i cannot figure out what format i save it in single column that i can use query to extract correct information.
for e.g.;
i was thinking to concatinate both fields like
col4= ABengineBA + ABBToyotaBBA
and in search i use
SELECT
TBL.col4
FROM
TBL
INNER JOIN
CONTAINSTABLE(TBL,col4,' "ABengineBA" AND "ABBToyotaBBA"') TBL1
ON
TBL.col1=TBL1.[key]
Result = 1 row
But it don't work in following scenario
col4= ABengineBA + ABBCorola ToyotaBBA
SELECT
TBL.col4
FROM
TBL
INNER JOIN
CONTAINSTABLE(TBL,col4,' "ABengineBA" AND "ABB*ToyotaBBA"') TBL1
ON
TBL.col1=TBL1.[key]
Result=0 Row
Any idea how i can write second query to get result?
I have the following  database structure
Stock     Depth41   Depth12   Depth34
AAA Â Â Â Â Â Â 1 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 2 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 1
BBB Â Â Â Â Â Â 2 Â Â Â Â Â Â 2 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 4
How can I show  Each Depth column as seperate row
AAA Â Â Â Â Â 1
AAA Â Â Â Â Â 2
AAA Â Â Â Â Â 1 Â as follows
This is a report I'm trying to build in SQL Reporting Services. I can do it in a hacky way adding two data sets and showing two tables, but I'm sure there is a better way.
TheTable
Order# Customer Status
STATUS has valid values of PROCESSED and INPROGRESS
The query I'm trying to build is Count of Processed and INProgress orders for a given Customer.
I can get them one at a time with something like this in two different datasets and showing two tables, but how do I achieve the same in one query?
Select Customer, Count (*) As Status1
FROM TheTable
Where (Status = N'Shipped')
Group By Customer
Hello,
I need to concatenate a column from multiple rows into a single column in a new table.
How can I do this?
SID NAME PGROUP
------------------------------------------------------------
3467602 CLOTHINGACTIVE
3467602 CLOTHINGDANCE
3467602 CLOTHINGLWR
Need to have
SID NAME PGROUP
------------------------------------------------------------
34676 02 CLOTHING ACTIVE , DANCE, LWR
THANK YOU
I have a stored proc I am updating in an OLEDB Command from the results of a Transform Script Component. The Stored Proc has over 65 input parameters, most of them have a NULL passed in. I dont want to create output columns in the Transform Script Component for all of them to map them from the "Available Input Columns" to "Available Destination Columns".
I want to create 3 or 4 generic Output columns for their data type - say IntegerOutput (datatype Int), DateTimeOut (datatype datetime) and so on. The I want to map these generic columns in the OLEDB Command as Available Input Columns" to multiple "Available Destination Columns" - wherever the datatype matches the input column.
But the OLEDB Command Column Mappings let me map One to One only. This will create a huge and unnecessary workload for me to develop and maintain - when I tell you I have 3 such stored procedures, all of whose interfaces are exactly same and for which I can create similar Output columns in the Transform Script Component.
So how do I go about doing this the smart way?
thanks in advance!
I have a SQL Query issue you can find in SQL Fiddle
SQL FIDDLE for Demo
My query was like this
For Insert
Insert into Employee values('aa', 'T', 'qqq')
Insert into Employee values('aa' , 'F' , 'qqq')
Insert into Employee values('bb', 'F' , 'eee')
Insert into Employee values('cc' , 'T' , 'rrr')
Insert into Employee values('cc' , 'pp' , 'aaa')
Insert into Employee values('cc' , 'Zz' , 'bab')
Insert into Employee values('cc' , 'ZZ' , 'bac')
For select
select col1,MAX(col2) as Col2,Max(Col3) as Col3
from Employee
group by Col1
I supposed to get last row asÂ
  cc  Zz  bab
Instead I am gettingÂ
 cc  Zz  rrrÂ
which is wrong
LeaveEntitlementID PeriodID LeaveType EmployeeID NumberOfDays
1 1 Annual 1 10
2 1 Annual 1 10
3 1 Sick 2 10
4 2 Sick 2 10
5 2 Sick 2 10
I have the above table (LeaveEntitlement) which has the above columns.
What I want to sum the column NumberOfDays based on EmployeeID, LeaveType and PeriodID columns as of LeaveTypeNumberOfDays.
For example sum(NumberOfDays) where PeriodID=1 and EmployeeID=1 and LeaveType=Annual
The result should be shown in new column name AnnualLeave (20)
sum(NumberOfDays) where PeriodID=1 and EmployeeID=1 and LeaveType=Sick
The result should be shown in new column name SickLeave (10)
Same all leave Types
The table should be shown as the below after executing the query
LeaveEntitlementID PeriodID EmployeeID AnnualLeave SickLeave
1 1 1 20 0
2 1 2 0 10
3 2 2 0 20
is it possible in sql server
I have below dataset and i want to convert as per my requirement.
Dataset:
In the above dataset, if i take 9/5/2015 then i should get like below,
how to declare multiple derived columns in SSIS Derived Column Task in one attempt.as i have around 150 columns coming from Flat file. I had created the required Expression in Excel and now i want add those in derived column task but its allowing only 1 expression at a time.
View 4 Replies View RelatedHello i need to know hoy to use the LIKE operator to find results that contains 2 or more words.
================TABLE EXAMPLE======================
I HAVE A TABLE CALLED ITEMS
ITEMNAME
Good Bike
Good Mountain Bike
Klein Bike Mountain
===================================================
If i use SELECT ITEMNAME FROM ITEMS WHERE ITEMNAME LIKE '%Good Bike%' i only get:
Good Bike
What to code i need to write if i want to get that results for QUERY: "Good Bike" returns
Good Bike
Good Mountain Bike
Hi I'm using the full-text indexing on a table and I'm trying to implement a search where users can search for words and use wildcards themselves. However I'm working on a method so that can enter a wildcard in the middle of a word to get records where they are unsure of the spelling etc.
For instance, a search of 'Ste*en' should return results like 'Steven' and 'Stephen' etc. So if they are searching for word 'establishment' they can search for 'estab*ment' and it should return all the records using this query:
SELECT * FROM myTable WHERE CONTAINS(myField,'"estab*ment"')
If I do a wildcard at the end e.g: SELECT * FROM myTable WHERE CONTAINS(myField,'"estab*"')
I get the results I am looking for. But the middle wildcard does not seem to work as expected even though it is the syntax used on MSDN and other SQL info sites.
Is there something I am not doing properly?
hi i am working on sql server200.I m using "LIKE" to search the records.There is freetexttable and containstable table also.just like to know the difference between them.Could anyone provide me a good link regarding this??Thanks
View 3 Replies View RelatedHi There,
I've created a couple of search pages which look at sql server. whenever words or values like "?@~:&£^" etc, or words like for, the and so forth, the page the nasrty error page:
Execution of a full-text operation failed. A clause of the query contained only ignored words
Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Execution of a full-text operation failed. A clause of the query contained only ignored words.
In short: is there a way I can stop it doing this. It looks rather horrible. I've looked at form validation but cant find anything that seems to fit. I would imagine there is a simple solution, but I haven't been able to find it so far.
Many thanks
Stuart
hi
I want to know how convert number to words or words to number
for example. if i give input 100, i have to get the output "one hundred"
is there any built in function available. need solution immediately.
regards
nlakka
How can you search for the occurance of a whole word in a string? but not return any results that have the word as a substring.
For instance, if I search for the term 'scene' in a column. Then it will only return rows that have the word 'scene' and not those with the word 'scenery'. I've tried the following sql, but it relies on having text either side of the word as well. If the word 'scene' is on the begining or end of the cell then it is not returned.
SELECT Name, Description
FROM tblWine
WHERE Name LIKE '%[^a-zA-Z]scene[^a-zA-Z]%'
OR Description LIKE '%[^a-zA-Z]scene[^a-zA-Z]%'
Any ideas?
Goran
Sir,
is there is any method to convert numeric ecpression to words ie 110 to "one humdred ten"
Pawandeep Singh
Can I define field names with more words in Access and SQL Server likefield: "Bus station" instead "BusStation" or "Bus_Station"? I have hadproblems because of this in VB6. Can I have problems in VB 2005 or C# 2005and SQL Server?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi,I'm trying to read a varchar(50) field writed in Japanese using thissentence:is = rset.getBinaryStream(num);at that sentence the JDBC driver shows the following error:java.sql.SQLException: [Microsoft][SQLServer 2000 Driver forJDBC]Unsupported data conversion.Does anybody know why?Thank you,--__________________________________________Emilio PerezJoin Bytes!SINERGIA TECNOLÓGICAC/ Eusebio Sempere 1, Entreplanta A30003 AlicanteTel. 965 136 191www.sinergiatec.com__________________________________________La información incluida en el presente correo electrónico es CONFIDENCIAL,siendo para el uso exclusivo del destinatario arriba mencionado. Si ustedlee este mensaje y no es el destinatario señalado, el empleado o el agenteresponsable de entregar el mensaje al destinatario, o ha recibido estacomunicación por error, le informamos que está totalmente prohibidacualquier divulgación, distribución o reproducción de esta comunicación, yle rogamos que nos lo notifique, nos devuelva el mensaje original a ladirección arriba mencionada y borre el mensaje. Gracias.
View 2 Replies View RelatedHi,
Is it possible with SQL Server 2005 to include ignored words in a full-text search? For example, searching for "in force as of"? This gives the same results as searching for "force" only. I've tried to empty the ignored words list (noiseENG.txt), but this does not seem to have any effect.
Also we want to be able to search for strings such as "205/1305-2". Searching with punctuation characters in a query seems to be a problem.
What are the possibillities in SQL Server 2005 with regard to these problems?
Can someone point me in the right direction to write a select query to return the first 10 whole words from a table?
For example, table "testtable" contains a field named "description" with value "here is some test data in order to select the first full ten words from."
The SELECT statement would return the value "here is some test data in order to select the".
Thanks in advance!
I need to query out multuple rows of data from the following table and retrieve it as a single row. Ideally, I'd like to do some sort of subquery that supports multiple columns, but as far as I know, that only exists on Oracle, not MSSQL.
Here's an example of the data:UserDefinedFieldId UserDefinedRowID FieldValue1 1 date (stored as text)2 1 text3 1 text1 2 date (stored as text)2 2 text3 2 text...27 UserDefinedFieldIds for each row in the actual table
I wrote a working query, but I need something more efficient for this particular application. (The query to do this must fit in a 2000char data field--with all 27columns brought in with separate subqueries, I'm pushing 5000.) Already tried shorter table names, which only saved me about a 1000 characters.
SELECT (SELECT SecondaryTable.FieldValue FROM UserDefinedData AS SecondaryTable WHERE SecondaryTable.UserDefinedRowID = PrimaryTable.UserDefinedRowId AND SecondaryTable.UserDefinedFieldId = 1) AS Column1, ,,, (SELECT SecondaryTable.FieldValue FROM UserDefinedData AS SecondaryTable WHERE SecondaryTable.UserDefinedRowID = PrimaryTable.UserDefinedRowId AND SecondaryTable.UserDefinedFieldId = 27) AS Column27,FROM UserDefinedData AS PrimaryTableWHERE PrimaryTable.UserDefinedFieldId = 5 AND Cast(Cast(PrimaryTable.FieldValue AS varchar(64)) AS datetime) > GetDate() ORDER BY PrimaryTable.UserDefinedRowID, PrimaryTable.UserDefinedFieldId
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Brad
I have two tables, one of which is a key table with a subaccount number and a set of attributes that define that subaccount. I am trying to join this key table with the table with all the attributes and come up with one table of subaccounts. The Subaccounts should only lookup the attributes associated with them, not all of the attributes, so I put OR [attribute] IS NULL in the WHERE clause so it only matched on the appropriate columns. This worked great in an initial test with two attributes but when I put all 9 attributes in it crashed with this message "Msg 415, Level 16, State 1
The current query would require an index on a work table to be built with 15 keys. The maximum allowable number of keys is 16"
like this
CREATE VIEW subaccounts
(Subacct_no, balance)
AS SELECT
(s.Account_No + "." + r.Subacct_Ext, S.Balance)
FROM Acct_Rcd r, Subacct_Key s
WHERE
(s.attr1 = r.attr1 OR s.attr1 IS NULL)
AND (s.attr2 = r.attr2 OR s.attr2 IS NULL)