Jul 6, 2006
Hi this is my first post
I really needs some help
I have been stressing with issue for last few days.
I have a stored Procedure ramApplicationAddTest, I can run it through SQL Query Analyser without any problem.
I can call this using JDBC and it works, here is how I make call I make to SP
var con1 = DBDriver.getConnection ("alias:ProclaimConnect");
var stmt = con1.prepareCall( "{call ramApplicationAddTest(?,?,?,?,?)}");
stmt.setString(1,'BuildApp');
stmt.setString(2,'BASwimPool');
stmt.setString(3,'Test Test....');
stmt.setString(4,'');
stmt.setFloat(5,0);
stmt.execute();
stmt.close();
con1.close();
I also have another SQL 2000 Stored Procedure called
RamApplicationAddTest1, I can run this SP also through SQL Query Analyser without any problem.
But when I try to run this using JDBC it, gives me following Exception.
SQLState[ERR-Unexpected]ErrorCode[0]Message[java.lang.NullPointerException
at com.hs.form.jdbc.JDBCErrorhandler.isMssqlConnectio nErrorInTx(JDBCErrorHanlder.
An exception 'DatabaseQueryException' has occurred at DatabaseQueryClientWinInetImpl.cpp (291).
var con2 = DBDriver.getConnection ("alias:ProclaimConnect");
var stmt = con2.prepareCall( "{call ramApplicationAddTest1(?,?,?)}");
stmt.setString(1,’BuildApp’);
stmt.setString(2,’BASwimPool’);
stmt.setString(3,’Test’);
stmt.execute();
stmt.close();
con2.close();
I hope somebody can give me some hints to fix this.
Amar
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 5, 2004
Hi,
Recently, I found a bug in Microsoft's official SQL Server2000 JDBC driver.
It seemed to lie in the Statement's setDate() method. Maybe they simply assumed
all date are represented in 12-hours format.
The test code is below:
public void testMisc() throws Exception {
Connection conn = TransactionManager.getConnection();
String sql = "select count(salescheck0_.ID) as x0_0_ " +
"from T_CHK_OUT_BILL_TEST salescheck0_ " +
"where (salescheck0_.EX_TIME>?)" +
"and(salescheck0_.EX_TIME<?)";
PreparedStatement stmt = conn.prepareCall(sql);
SimpleDateFormat sdf = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss");
Date timefrom = sdf.parse("2004-04-02 00:00:00.000");
Date timeto = sdf.parse("2004-04-02 23:00:00.000");
stmt.setDate(1, new java.sql.Date(timefrom.getTime()));
stmt.setDate(2, new java.sql.Date(timeto.getTime()));
// stmt.setString(1, "2004-04-02 00:00:00.000" );
// stmt.setString(2, "2004-04-02 23:59:59.000" );
ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery();
if(rs.next()) {
int count = rs.getInt(1);
System.out.println("count = " + count);
}
}
The test data is following:
ID, SO_ID,WH_ID,CLIENT_ID,CODE,OPERATOR,CHK_OUT_TIME, STATUS,CREATE_TIME,DELIVER_TYPE
86179,67521,1,661,SLCCK200404020016,xuwei,2004-4-2 12:15,20,2004-4-2 9:40,10
86229,67566,1,118,SLCCK200404020066,xuwei,2004-4-2 12:23,20,2004-4-2 9:41,10
86231,67568,1,130,SLCCK200404020068,xuwei,2004-4-2 12:23,20,2004-4-2 9:41,10
86232,67569,1,134,SLCCK200404020069,xuyili,2004-4-2 11:08,20,2004-4-2 9:41,10
86233,67571,1,151,SLCCK200404020070,xuwei,2004-4-2 12:23,20,2004-4-2 9:41,10
86234,67572,1,55,SLCCK200404020071,xuwei,2004-4-2 12:23,20,2004-4-2 9:41,10
86235,67573,1,71,SLCCK200404020072,xuwei,2004-4-2 12:23,20,2004-4-2 9:41,10
86252,67590,1,298,SLCCK200404020089,xuwei,2004-4-2 12:33,20,2004-4-2 9:41,10
86268,67576,1,25,SLCCK200404020105,xuwei,2004-4-2 12:23,20,2004-4-2 10:18,10
86269,67588,1,271,SLCCK200404020106,xuwei,2004-4-2 12:33,20,2004-4-2 10:20,10
86270,67506,1,42,SLCCK200404020107,xuwei,2004-4-2 12:15,20,2004-4-2 10:21,10
86271,67531,1,751,SLCCK200404020108,xuyili,2004-4-2 11:28,20,2004-4-2 10:22,10
86272,67570,1,149,SLCCK200404020109,xuwei,2004-4-2 12:23,20,2004-4-2 10:29,10
86273,67600,1,6,SLCCK200404020110,xuwei,2004-4-2 12:15,20,2004-4-2 10:40,10
86373,67665,3,686,SLCCK200404020210,root,2004-4-2 17:18,20,2004-4-2 16:32,10
86374,67657,3,883,SLCCK200404020211,root,2004-4-2 17:18,20,2004-4-2 16:32,10
86375,67666,3,686,SLCCK200404020212,root,2004-4-2 17:18,20,2004-4-2 16:32,10
86376,54799,1,395,SLCCK200404020213,zhouliyi,2004-4-2 19:52,20,2004-4-2 19:51,10
86377,55383,1,341,SLCCK200404020214,zhoulingyi,200 4-4-2 19:52,20,2004-4-2 19:51,10
Given the code and data, the expected output ought to be "count = 19"
But it's "count = 19" instead.
However, if you set date by using alternative method like the commented statements,
you can get the correct result.
Does anybody know if there exists any patch?
Could we expect Mircosoft to fix this bug? If so, where could I submit this bug report?
Regards,
Justin
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 27, 2008
Parameter
Access 2000/XP
SQL Server 7.0
SQL Server 2000
MSDE 2000
Number of instances per server
n/a
n/a
16
16
Number of databases per instance / server
n/a
32,767
32,767
32,767
Number of objects per database
32,768
2,147,483,647
2,147,483,647
2,147,483,647
Number of users per database
n/a
16,379
16,379
16,379
Number of roles per database
n/a
16,367
16,367
16,367
Overall size of database (excluding logs)
2 GB
1,048,516 TB
1,048,516 TB
2 GB
Number of columns per table
255
1024
1024
1024
Number of rows per table
limited by storage
limited by storage
limited by storage
limited by storage
Number of bytes per row
(Excluding TEXT/MEMO/IMAGE/OLE)
2 KB
8 KB
8 KB
8 KB
Number of columns per query
255
4,096
4,096
4,096
Number of tables per query
32
256
256
256
Size of procedure / query
64 KB
250 MB
250 MB
250 MB
Number of input params per procedure / query
199
1,024
2,100
2,100
Size of SQL statement / batch
64 KB
64 KB
64 KB
64 KB
Depth of subquery nesting
50
32
32
32
Number of indexes per table
32
250 (1 clustered)
250 (1 clustered)
250 (1 clustered)
Number of columns per index
10
16
16
16
Number of characters per object name
64
128
128
128
Number of concurrent user connections
255
32,767
32,767
5
View 1 Replies
View Related
