I have a temp table that looks like this (as a result of two seperate inserts into it):
RowNumber starttime endtime
----------- ----------- -----------
1 l 0 l NULL
2 l 360 l NULL
3 l 720 l NULL
4 l 1020 l NULL
5 l 1380 l NULL
6 l NULL l 180
7 l NULL l 540
8 l NULL l 900
9 l NULL l 1200
10 l NULL l 1440
I need some help getting it to look like this (with No NULL cell values)!
RowNumber starttime endtime
----------- ----------- -----------
1 l 0 l 180
2 l 360 l 540
3 l 720 l 900
4 l 1020 l 1200
5 l 1380 l 1440
PLEASE help I have been looking at this for the past 3 days and can't figure it out! :o
The SP UserPersist_GetByCriteria does a "SELECT * FROM tbl_User WHERE gender = @Gender AND culture = @Culture", so why am I receiving this error when both tables have the same structure?
The error is being reported as coming from UserPersist_GetByCriteria on the "SELECT * FROM tbl_User" line.
I have created a temporary table that has an identity and default values that it creates and sets but also it needs to get values from a sub query for the final insert into the temp table. I have my create temp table, and my insert into set up but my select is confusing me since some of the values I need to select are determined as they are entered into the temp table. Is there a way to alias them or not put them in the select? If I leave them out it says there are more values in the insert than in the select.
Create Table #TempLabTestConfigImport
(temp_id int identity(1,1),system_id int default 2250, labtestkey nvarchar(10) null,
This one is interesting...Is there any way to pass a joined parameter into a UDF as I'm attempting below?I have a temp table that I'm trying to create:create table #t3(bmkPerson int primary key,LangCode nchar(5),SName varchar(1000))insert into #t3select t2.bmkPerson, t2.LangCode,select SName from SName_trans_udf(t2.LangCode)from #t2 t2Thanks in advance,RenaeJoin Bytes!
I have to select several field values from a table and need to assign them to different variables in my SP.Here's what I do now: declare @ReceiverEmail nvarchar(50) SET @ReceiverEmail=(SELECT Email FROM Users WHERE UserCode=@UserCodeOwner) declare @UsernameSender nvarchar(50) SET @UsernameSender=(SELECT Username FROM Users WHERE UserCode=@UserCodeOwner)As you can see I have to search the Users table twice: once for the Email and a second time for the Username...and all that based on the SAME usercode...:SSo, is there an option where I only have to search the table once and return the Email and UserName fields and assign them to my variables (without using a temp table....)?
HiI need some help on achieving the following:I wrote a querie which collects Data out of three Tables, the Resultlooks like this:SET NOCOUNT ONDECLARE @ROWINTDECLARE @CURPTNO CURSORSET @CURPTNO = CURSORFORSELECT * FROM TEMPOPEN @CURPTNOFETCH NEXT FROM @CURPTNOINTO @ROWWHILE (@@FETCH_STATUS = 0)BEGINSELECT ONE.CYNO, ONE.ROLE, ONE.ROL_BEZ, ONE.PTNO, ONE.NOCY, TWO.TEXTAS NOCY_TEXTFROM(SELECT CY.CYNO,RE.CYNO AS RECYNO, RTRIM(RE.ROLE) AS ROLE, RTRIM(V_ROLE.TEXT) ASROL_BEZ,RE.PTNO AS PTNO, RTRIM(RE.NAME) AS SACHBEARBEITER, RE.NOCYFROM CYRIGHT OUTER JOINRE ON RE.CYNO = CY.CYNOINNER JOINV_ROLE ON RE.ROLE = V_ROLE.CODEWHERE (RE.PTNO IN(SELECT PT.PTNOFROM PTWHERE PT.PTNO IN(@ROW)AND V_ROLE.LANGUAGE = PT.CLANG))) AS ONELEFT JOIN(SELECT V_NOCY.CODE, V_NOCY.TEXTFROM V_NOCYINNER JOINPT ON PT.CLANG = V_NOCY.LANGUAGEAND PT.PTNO IN (SELECT PT.PTNOFROM PTWHERE PT.PTNO IN(@ROW))) AS TWOON ONE.NOCY = TWO.CODEFETCH NEXT FROM @CURPTNOINTO @ROWENDCLOSE @CURPTNODEALLOCATE @CURPTNOThe Result looks like this:RS1:6313,1300,Architekt,99737505,NULL,NULL2392762,100,Bauherr,99737505,NULL,NULLRS2:2693265,100,Bauherr,99756900,NULL,NULLNULL,1,Planer,99756900,2,Bauherr macht Pläne selberRS3:2691919,100,Bauherr,99755058,NULL,NULL2691962,6000,Kontakt,99755058,NULL,NULLMy Problem is, that I need to have all the Resultsets in one Table atthe end.So my further undertaking was to create a Temp Table with theexpectation to receive all the resultsets in one Step.The TSQL for this looks like that:SET NOCOUNT ONCREATE TABLE #CYRE_TEMP(CYNOINT NULL,ROLEINT NULL,ROL_BEZVARCHAR (60) NULL,PTNOINT NULL ,NOCYINT NULL,TEXTVARCHAR (60) NULL)GODECLARE @CYNOINT,@ROLEINT,@ROL_BEZVARCHAR (60),@PTNOINT,@NOCYINT,@TEXTVARCHAR (60),@ROWINT,@CURPTNOCURSORSET @CURPTNO = CURSOR FORSELECT PTNO FROM TEMPOPEN @CURPTNOFETCH NEXT FROM @CURPTNOINTO @ROWWHILE (@@FETCH_STATUS = 0)BEGININSERT INTO #CYRE_TEMP (CYNO, ROLE, ROL_BEZ, PTNO, NOCY, TEXT)VALUES(@CYNO,@ROLE ,@ROL_BEZ ,@PTNO ,@NOCY ,@TEXT)SELECT @CYNO = ONE.CYNO,@ROLE = ONE.ROLE,@ROL_BEZ = ONE.ROL_BEZ,@PTNO = ONE.PTNO,@NOCY = ONE.NOCY,@TEXT = TWO.TEXTFROM(SELECT CY.CYNO, RTRIM(RE.ROLE) AS ROLE, RTRIM(V_ROLE.TEXT) ASROL_BEZ,RE.PTNO AS PTNO, RTRIM(RE.NAME) AS SACHBEARBEITER, RE.NOCYFROM CYRIGHT OUTER JOINRE ON RE.CYNO = CY.CYNOINNER JOINV_ROLE ON RE.ROLE = V_ROLE.CODEWHERE (RE.PTNO IN(SELECT PT.PTNOFROM PTWHERE PT.PTNO =@ROWAND V_ROLE.LANGUAGE = PT.CLANG))) AS ONELEFT JOIN(SELECT V_NOCY.CODE, V_NOCY.TEXTFROM V_NOCYINNER JOINPT ON PT.CLANG = V_NOCY.LANGUAGEAND PT.PTNO IN (SELECT PT.PTNOFROM PTWHERE PT.PTNO =@ROW)) AS TWOON ONE.NOCY = TWO.CODEFETCH NEXT FROM @CURPTNOINTO @ROWENDCLOSE @CURPTNODEALLOCATE @CURPTNOSELECT * FROM #CYRE_TEMPDROP TABLE #CYRE_TEMPGOAnd the Output looks like this now:Q1:NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL2392762,100,Bauherr,99737505,NULL,NULLNULL,1,Planer,99756900,2,Bauherr macht Pläne selberCan someone help me getting all the 6 Rows into one Table as Output?I appreciate any available Help on this..Ssscha
Hi, I am using a SQL back end to dynamically populate an asp.net report/page. As the data I'm interrogating is created from a tree control, I'm having to use a recursive function to retrieve the data into a series of ID values. This all happens at the moment in a DataTable manipulated with c# code. So my ID values end up in this datatable. My problem is that I am then performing a crosstab query in SQL Server 2000 and these ID are required as part of that query. Should I create a temp table and join this into the query or should i feed in a series of ID values into a where clause? Any help gratefully appreciated. Thanks. John
I would like to know if the following sql can be used to obtain specific columns from calling a stored procedure with parameters:
/* Create TempTable */ CREATE TABLE #tempTable (MyDate SMALLDATETIME, IntValue INT) GO /* Run SP and Insert Value in TempTable */ INSERT INTO #tempTable (MyDate, IntValue) EXEC TestSP @parm1, @parm2
If the above does not work or there is a better way to accomplish this goal, how to change the sql?
I think this is a very simple question, however, I don't know the answer. What is the difference between a regular Temp table and a Global Temp table? I need to create a temp table within an sp that all users will use. I want the table recreated each time someone accesses the sp, though, because some of the same info may need to be inserted and I don't want any PK errors.
select * from sys.master_files - size column value here is 1024 for .mdf,size here for .ldf is 64 select * from tempdb.sys.database_files - size column value here is 3576 for .mdf,size here for .ldf is 224
Why is there a difference and not the same. size columns in the above 2 tables for temp db's do they represent different values ?
I have 2 identical tables one contains current settings, the other contains all historical settings.I could create a union view to display the current values from table A and all historical values from table B, butthat would also require a Variable to hold the tblid for both select statements.
Q. Can this be done with one joined or conditional select statement?
DECLARE @tblid int = 501 SELECT 1,2,3,4,'CurrentSetting' FROM TableA ta WHERE tblid = @tblid UNION SELECT 1,2,3,4,'PreviosSetting' FROM Tableb tb WHERE tblid = @tblid
I am relatively new to SQL and as a project I have been asked to create the SQL for a simple database to record train details. I want to implement a check constraint which will prevent data from being inserted into a table if the weight of the train is more than the maximum towing weight of the locomotive. FOr instance, I need to add the unladen weight and maximum capacity of each wagon (located in the wagon type table) and compare it against the locomotive maximum pulling weight (the locomotive class table). I have the following SQL but it will not work:
check((select SUM(fwt.unladen_weight+fwt.maximum_payload) from hauls as h,freight_wagon as fw,freight_wagon_type as fwt,train as t where h.freight_wagon_serial_number = fw.freight_wagon_serial_number and fw.freight_wagon_type = fwt.freight_wagon_type and h.train_number = t.train_number) < (select lc.maximum_towing_weight from locomotive_class as lc,locomotive as l,train as t where lc.locomotive_class = l.locomotive_class and l.locomotive_serial_number = t.locomotive_serial_number))
The hauls table is where the constraint has been placed and is the intermediary table between train and freight wagon.
I may not have explained this very well; but in short, i need to compare the sum of two values in one table against a values located in another table...At present I keep getting a message telling me the sub query cannot return more than one row.
i am inserting something into the temp table even without creating it before. But this does not give any compilation error. Only when I want to execute the stored procedure I get the error message that there is an invalid temp table. Should this not result in a compilation error rather during the execution time.?
--create the procedure and insert into the temp table without creating it. --no compilation error. CREATE PROC testTemp AS BEGIN INSERT INTO #tmp(dt) SELECT GETDATE() END
only on calling the proc does this give an execution error
Simple example:    declare @tTable(col1 int)    insert into @tTable(col1) values (1)    select * from @tTable
Works perfectly in SQL Server Management Studio and the database connection is OK to as I may generate PP table using complex (or simple) queries without difficulty.
But when trying to get this same result in a PP table I get an error, idem when replacing table variable by a temporary table.
Message: OLE DB or ODBC error. .... The current operation was cancelled because another operation the the transaction failed.
If on the source I have a new column, the script generated by SqlPackage.exe recreates the table on the background with moving the data into a temp storage. If the table is big, such approach can cause issues.
Example of the script is below: in the source project I added columns [MyColumn_LINE_1]  and [MyColumn_LINE_5].
Is there any way I can make it generating an alter statement instead?
BEGIN TRANSACTION; SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE; SET XACT_ABORT ON; CREATE TABLE [dbo].[tmp_ms_xx_MyTable] ( [MyColumn_TYPE_CODE] CHAR (3) NOT NULL,
[Code] ....
The same script is generated regardless the table having data or not, having a clustered or nonclustered PK.
I want to insert the data from temp table to other table. Only condition is, it needs to sorted based on tool number and tool date. For example if we have ten records for tool number 1000, it should be order by tool number and then based on tool_dt. Both tables doesn't have any primary keys. Please find below my code. I removed all the unnecessary columns for simple understanding. INSERT INTO tool_summary  (tool_nbr, tool_dt) select tool_nbr, tool_dt from #tool order by tool_nbr, tool_dt...But this query is not working as expected. Data is getting shuffled.
WE have a job that loads data from an Oralce DB into our SQL Server 2000 DB twice a day. The schedule has just changed so that now there is a possibility of having my west coast users impacted when it runs at 5 PM PST and my east coast users impacted when it runs at 7 AM EST. As a workaround, I have developed a DTS package that loads the data into temp tables instead of the real tables. IE. Oracle -> XTable_temp instead of Oracle -> XTable. The load sometimes takes about an hour to an hour and a half to load, so this solution works great, but I want to then lock the table, delete it and rename the temp table to table X. The pseudo code would be:
Begin Transaction
Lock Table XTable
Drop XTable
Alter Table XTable_temp rename to XTable
Release Lock XTable
End Transaction
Create XTable_temp
I see two issues with this solution. 1) I think if I can lock XTable that the lock would be released when the table is dropped and the XTable_temp was being renamed. 2) I can't find a command to rename a table.
I want to pass the 'inserted' table from a trigger into an SP, I think I need to do this by dumping inserted table into a temporary table and passing the temp table. However, I need to do this for many tables, and don't want to list all the column names for each table/trigger (maintenance nightmare).
Can I dump the 'inserted' table to a temp table WITHOUT specifying the column names?
table2 is intially populated (basically this will serve as historical table for view); temptable and table2 will are similar except that table2 has two extra columns which are insertdt and updatedt
process: 1. get data from an existing view and insert in temptable 2. truncate/delete contents of table1 3. insert data in table1 by comparing temptable vs table2 (values that exists in temptable but not in table2 will be inserted) 4. insert data in table2 which are not yet present (comparing ID in t2 and temptable) 5. UPDATE table2 whose field/column VALUE is not equal with temptable. (meaning UNMATCHED VALUE)
* for #5 if a value from table2 (historical table) has changed compared to temptable (new result of view) this must be updated as well as the updateddt field value.
I need to decide what is better to use: global temp table ( I can't use local one) or permanent table in SQL 2000 stored procedures. I extract data from linked server table and update several tables on our server. Those procedures scheduled to run every 3 hours.
Another question: for some reasons when I used global temp table, I wasn't able to schedule multi steps with every step executing one of the stored procedures.I think global temp tables should be visible to other stored procedures, right?
Hi everyone, I'm fairly new to sql and right now I am struggling with a script. I am trying to extract data from a normal table into a temporary table, update it in the temporary table, then put it back into the normal table. I'll display my code, let me know what you think, any suggestions are appreciated. Thanks a lot.
Hi, I wanna know is there any advantage of perf gain when using Derived Tables over Temp Tables, advice me which one is better to use. Can I create Indexes and Insert/Update records into Derived Tables.
Hi All,Hope someone can help me...Im trying to highlight the advantages of using table variables asapposed to temp tables within single scope.My manager seems to believe that table variables are not advantageousbecause they reside in memory.He also seems to believe that temp tables do not use memory...Does anyone know how SQL server could read data from a temp tablewithout passing the data contained therein through memory???Is this a valid advantage/disadvantage of table variables VS temptables?
