We are using SQL 1005 Standard Edt, so online Rebuild index is not available. Any way to figure out how much time will it take to rebuild index on given size of database so i can make sure i set schedule for rebuilding index when it is okay not to answer DB traffice during that time.
Thanks,
I'm using SQL Server 2005 SP1 Standard.
On the Rebuild Index Task there is a checkbox at the bottom that says 'Keep index online while reindexing'.
Great I thought, I'll check that.
Later, when I tested the job, I got this error:
'Online index operations can only be performed in Enterprise edition of SQL Server.'
Why have that checkbox available to check, if I'm running a version that doesn't allow it? Where's the bug?
Thanks
Ed
I was under impression that rebuilding index online largely means that the index will remain available for use during rebuild and my procs and query will be able to use it during rebuild. Also my understanding was that table will be locked very briefly while the schema change will be completing.But when I was rebuilding the clustered index online on a large table with some 3 million records, the table got locked and I was not able even to read the data from it for some 5 minutes. Then I cancelled the operation as it was production server and it was one of our main transaction table.
Is rebuilding index online supposed to work this way? The table has no other index.The parameteres I used are:
REBUILD WITH (PAD_INDEX = ON, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = ON, ONLINE = ON, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON, FILLFACTOR = 95)
Hi!
I was wondering what kind of locks (if any) SQL Server 2000 holds on tables while rebuilding clustered and non-clustered indexes.
Thanks!
Do anyone know how to rebuild indexes on the maintenance plan??
I would like to automate rebuilding my indexes on the database about once every month.
I know you can manually do this by using DBCC DBREINDEX. This is to long and tedious.
Thanks in advance!
All,
I have scheduled dbreindex command to run on an clustered indexed on a very large table over night, so far this as failed to complete successfully. I think it may have something to do with the amount of space available in the device; the table is approx 238mb in size and the available disk space left in the device is 200 mb.
Does anyone know how much space is required to reindex a table/index this size and if it is required on the same device as the table or in tempdb.
Or even better, if anyone can explain the inter-workings of how the dbreindex command reorgs the table.
Thanks Mathew
Hello all,
I need to diagnose a problem, this Sunday a regular Database Maintenance plan which is supposed to rebuild indexes took exactly 6 hours and 32 minutes. Now that’s a hell lot of time and during all that process users were denied access to those tables. This is a production server. I want to know what caused that plan to run for so long and how can I avoid this to happen again plus if it ever happens again how can I make sure that atleast it doesn’t lock tables. I know DBCC INDEXDEFRAG doesn’t lock tables but how can I make Database Maintenance plan to run DBCC INDEXDEFRAG instead of DBCC DBREINDEX but more importantly why it took 6 hours.
Thanks all
(Oops, sorry I posted this on the SQL 7 discussion earlier).
----------------------
I was wondering what kind of locks (if any) SQL Server 2000 holds on tables while rebuilding clustered and non-clustered indexes.
Thanks!
Hello all,
I need to diagnose a problem, this Sunday a regular Database Maintenance plan which is supposed to rebuild indexes took exactly 6 hours and 32 minutes. Now that’s a hell lot of time and during all that process users were denied access to those tables. This is a production server. I want to know what caused that plan to run for so long and how can I avoid this to happen again plus if it ever happens again how can I make sure that atleast it doesn’t lock tables. I know DBCC INDEXDEFRAG doesn’t lock tables but how can I make Database Maintenance plan to run DBCC INDEXDEFRAG instead of DBCC DBREINDEX but more importantly why it took 6 hours.
Thanks all
Hello,
I'm new to rebuilding and reorg indexes. I used the standard report feature in 2005 to look up Index Physical Statistics on one db. I found recommendation to rebuild a few indexes that contain a number of fragments. I created a maint. task, I know maint. tasks are not a cure-all but so far I am just testing the waters. I created two tasks, one to rebuild and another to reorg. After I ran the job, I looked at the report and it still showed recommendation to rebuild the indexes. What is a better solution for my case?
Hi,
I have recenlty had to rebuild the indexes for the entire database as they were running a little slow. It prompted me to further investigate the health of the indexes on the database. I have been using the sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats view to do this. I had a query with regards to the avg_fragmentation_in_percent column that the view displays. I have rebuilt all the indexes and for some of the indexes the fragmentation value remains the same. The following is an example of what is returned by the sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats for a single index:
Table, IndexName, avg_fragmentation_in_percent, avg_page_space_used_in_percent
Links, PK_Links, 77.7777777777778, 97.1501606127996
Links, PK_Links, 0, 1.42080553496417
I do not understand why this index the fragmentation is so high even though I have rebuilt it. It is not just this index it occurs for other indexes as well. What could be some of the factors that are causing this to occur?
HiI got the advice to rebuild the indexes on the databases once a year.Espesially if the database have grown much. The question is: How do Ido that?If I try to run the indexscript wich was run when the databases werecreated, I only get the message that the indexes already exists.Are there a command to automatically rebuild the indexesautomatically?Roger
View 3 Replies View RelatedAight, so I added a full text catalog and a full text index for one specific column and table in my database.Now the issue is, whenever I rebuild it, it locks the full text index forever, making it unsuable. Now, there are only 30,000 records i need to search, so it isn't like there is this massive amount of data. What am I doing wrong to where it is locking the index and disallowing me to use the stored procedure that does the searching?
View 2 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to reclaim space after rebuilding indexes(shrinking is not an option).
View 9 Replies View RelatedCurrently we are facing some performance issue while accessing the archive data from the archive tables. the archive table is hugh and it contains around 100,000,000 records and this archive table is being used in few reports and in our commission cycles too. since we are facing performance issues we are rebuilding index once in a week on all the indexes on this archive table.
We have 1 clustered index and 5 non clustered indexes, every time when we rebuild all these indexes on this table it is taking more time, more often rebuilding the clustered index itself is taking approx. 1hr which is consuming more time. wanted to know is there any useful to rebuild clustered indexes or not, if yes then what would be the better way. if not then do we need to rebuild only non clustered indexes.
Hi all,
When I am rebuilding the indexes on the tables, I am getting lot of free space( unallocated) on the database.
Before rebuilding the indexes , the size of the database = 385 Gb
After rebuilding the indexes, the size jumps to = 572 Gb (i.e.) This means 187 Gb of unallocated space .
The Command use to rebuild indexes is:
USE [databasename]
GO
ALTER INDEX [PK_index] ON [dbo].[tablename] REBUILD WITH
( PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = ON, ONLINE = OFF )
GO
So, every time we rebuild indexes, we have to shrink the database
(or)
Is there anything else ,I should be doing.
Thanks.
I have come across a database system which isn't designed to work optimally. It is fairly large (~400GB) and performance of loading and querying is degrading (improper data types, fragmented indexes, non unique clustering key and other problems). So, I have quite a task in front of me, but I am up for the challenge. I figure this is not a unique situation, many of us would have come across this before. I have done this before too, but only for smaller databases, some of the operations here I expect to take a couple of hours or more to complete (depending on load/infrastructure speed etc, I know).
My plan is thus:
+ Take a full backup of the database
+ Set the recovery model of the DB to simple
+ Drop non clustered indexes
+ Drop clustered indexes
+ Remove PKs (wrong data types, too large!)
+ Narrow data types (add new column, update column in batches to old value, rename new column to old column)
+ Add PKs, which will create clustered indexes automatically based on PK ID
+ Create non clustered indexes
+ Run a SHRINKDB (normal operations I would never do this, but this is a special case, ensure log file is truncated to a logical size especially after all those table modifications...)
+ Set the recovery model of the DB to Full
+ Ensure everything works OK or better
I am trying to automate my index rebuild and reorg based off of the percentage of fragmentation level. The first time you run it you have to change the alter proce Sp_NCRNRecreate then change it to Alter proc. It seems to run okay no errors but it doesn't seem to actually rebuild them. Please take a look and let me know if you see a program error somewhere. I would like create this sp to run automatically
use master
GO
Alter PROC sp_NCR_RecreateIndexes @AutoRun bit=0 AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @DatabaseName varchar(128), @SchemaName varchar(128), @objectName varchar(128), @IndexName varchar(128), @PercentFragmented float, @command varchar(max)
SELECT db_name(s.database_id) as DatabaseName, schema_name(o.schema_id) as SchemaName, o.name as TableName, i.name as IndexName, s.avg_fragmentation_in_percent AS PercentFragmented
INTO #IndexesToRebuild
FROM sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats (db_id(), Null, NULL, NULL, NULL) s
INNER JOIN sys.objects o ON s.object_id=o.object_id
INNER JOIN sys.indexes i ON s.object_id=i.object_id AND s.index_id=i.index_id
WHERE s.avg_fragmentation_in_percent > 10.0 AND s.index_id > 0
SELECT * FROM #IndexesToRebuild
DECLARE IndexCursor CURSOR FOR SELECT DatabaseName, SchemaName, TableName, IndexName, PercentFragmented FROM #IndexesToRebuild
OPEN IndexCursor
FETCH IndexCursor INTO @DatabaseName, @SchemaName, @objectName, @IndexName, @PercentFragmented
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS=0
BEGIN
SELECT @command = 'ALTER INDEX ' + @indexname +' ON ' + @databaseName + '.' + @schemaname + '.' + @objectName + CASE WHEN @PercentFragmented<30 THEN ' REORGANIZE' ELSE ' REBUILD' END;
print @command
IF @AutoRun=1
EXEC(@command)
FETCH IndexCursor INTO @DatabaseName, @SchemaName, @objectName, @IndexName, @PercentFragmented
END
--SELECT * FROM #IndexStats
END
GO
EXEC sys.sp_MS_marksystemobject sp_NCR_RecreateIndexes
GO
EXEC otis..sp_NCR_RecreateIndexes
EXEC ncrCommon..sp_NCR_RecreateIndexes
GO
If I'm doing data compression(page level) does it rebuild indexes too? and how about stats, does it update stats too?
View 4 Replies View RelatedHi,
We have a client that has a large (5Gb) database replicated to 13 subscribers, the publisher is Sql 2005, the subscribers are Sql Express. The publication has as few filtered articles too. I have found that after several months of continuous running Replication Monitor is taking a long time to report history on each subscriber.
Do people tend to rebuild the indexes on the system merge replication tables on production servers, or should the standard replication jobs take care of this?
Thanks for your help
Graham
I've been trying to get a definitive answer to this question but alas I have conflicting and patchy answers so far from other sources. I have an index that, lets say, requires 10GB of data space to rebuild..This index resides on a filegroup that spans 2 files on two seperate drives (i.e. a mdf and ndf)
When I rebuild this index how will each of these datafiles grow as the rebuild proceeds to completion? Lets for the time being remove the caveats of any other activity hitting the example index/database in question.My tests seem to show that only the mdf will grows (or the file with the lowest id in the that filegroup) provided there is enough space available in that particular file to complete the operation. The secondary ndf dat file doesnt grow at all if the mdf has enough space.
Is expected behavior? i.e. the index will be rebuilt in a contiguous manner relative to the files contained with the filegroup i.e. fileid 1 will grow till limit reached then next fileid grows etc?
Hi
-I have istalled sql server 2005 standard edition , I want to install sql server 2005 enterprise edition on the same machine.
Is it possible? I have Microsoft windows server 2003 SP2 and 1GB RAM.
I want to use partition function with the enterprise edition, will the trial version of sql server work for me?
-If I have already created a database and tables using the standard edition, will I be able to access and use the database using the installed trial version or will I have to start a fresh creating a new database?
- Is it possible to access the same database with any of the installed versions?
BTW, I am prety new to sql server and databases , I am trying to learn by myself
Thanks
Hello!M a newbie.. I just want to know, that wots the difference b/w SQL Server Standard Edition and Express Edition.?And can I use Visual Studio 2005 (Professional Edition) with SQL Server Express Edition.?
View 1 Replies View RelatedDear All,We have a database which contains many tables which have millions ofrecords. When We attach the database with MS SQL Server 2005 StandardEdition Server and run some queries (having joins, filters etc.) thenthey take very long time to execute while when We execute same querieson Enterprise Edition then they run 10 times faster than on standardedition.Our database does not use any features which are present in EnterpriseEdition and not present in Standard Edition. We want to know what arethe differences between Standard Edition and Enterprise Edition forperformance. Why should we go for Enterprise Edition when StandardEdition has all the features required.We are presently using evaluation versions of SQL Server 2005 Standardand Enterprise Editions.Thanks and regards,Nishant Sainihttp://www.simplyjava.com
View 23 Replies View RelatedI am attempting to upgrade a 2005 Standard Edtion to Enterprise Edition. This is a default instance. All components are upgraded successfully except the Database Engine. I receive the following error:
SQL Server Setup has encountered the following problem: [Microsoft][SQL Native Client][SQL Server]The certificate cannot be dropped because one or more entities are either signed or encrypted using it.. To continue, correct the problem, and then run SQL Server Setup again.
This installation does not have encryption enabled, so I do not undersand the error or how to correct it.
After rebooting the SQL instance appears to be upgraded to Enterprise, but it cannot be upgraded to SP2.
Thanks,
Hi all--I'm researching the cleanest downgrade path from a trial edition of SQL Server 2005 Enterprise to a licensed Standard Edition copy. It looks like downgrading will entail uninstalling the old version and installing the new version, but I'd like to save the original setup as much as possible. Detaching the old databases will preserve the non-system databases; what method would work best for restoring the system databases?
Thanks!
- Jon
The enterprise edition of SQL server includes some advanced BI features, for example the fuzzy lookup feature of IS. If the IS package lives on an enterprise edition of SQL server and the database the package it is targeting lives on a standard edition of SQL server can the advanced features be used? Can you run a fuzzy look against a database on a standard edition of SQL server when th IS package lives on an enterprise edition of SQL server? THANKS!
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi,
I have recently upgraded a SQL x64 server from Developer Edition to Standard Edition, This succeeded without issue. Following a reboot SQL Server yielded the following message
Your SQL Server installation is either corrupt or has been tampered with unable to load SQLBoot.DLL. Please uninstall then re-run setup to correct this issue.
Please can anyone help ?
Many Thanks
Marcus Stuart
I'd like to upgrade from my current SQL Server version: 09.00.3042 (Workgroup edition that comes with SBS upgrade) to the standard edition that I've just purchased. I've attempted to run setup.exe SKUUPGRADE=1 from the command prompt and it just tells me that there's nothing new to install.
I don't really want to uninstall the current installation just to do something that shouldn't be complicated to do, upgrading software versions should not be a difficult process.
Does anybody have any experience with this?
I believe it is possible to restore databases from Enterprise edition to an enviroment with Standard edition. We have been able to do it on databases without any partitioned tables. But if a database has partitioned tables it will not start up in the Standard edition after a successful restore. The error log states that the database will not start because partitions are not allowed in Standard edition (which we knew). But we were led to believe that the databases would restore and open fine, the partitions would just not be there in Standard edition. Are we possibly doing something wrong or will this just not work?
Thanks
Chris
As an ISV, I want to certify my product on Standard Edition. I am using Developer Edition everywhere. Is there a way I can do the certification using the Developer Edition, or do I need to obtain/purchase a copy of the Standard Edition?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI found so many websites wrote that fuzzy grouping ,fuzzy lookup, term extraction, term lookup,Dimension processing destination adapter and Data mining model training destination adapter only available at Enterprise Edition.
Anyway i still can use these components at Standard Edition.
Is that any features different between these two edition for these components? Thanks
Hello all,
Here I need some help or suggestions for the following topic...
I am using SQL server 2000 enterprise edition installed on the machine. Now I wanted to change the edition from enterprise to standard.
There are around 4 user databases exists on the server.
What are the areas I have to take care while doing this? Could I do as normal installation?
No log shipping implemented on the server.
Your suggestions would be very helpful to me.
Thanks in advance.