Record Limitations Of SQL 2000

Oct 9, 2007

Can anyone tell me if SQL 2000 has a record limitation on tables?

The table that I have is very basic. It contains 6 columns, none of which can contain more than 10 characters, but I'm already sitting at 2,500,000 records and expecting up to 20-30 million records. Can it handle it?

Thanks in advance.

 

View 2 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

FN_DBLOG - Limitations On Columns - [RowLog Contents 0] [Log Record]

Apr 11, 2007


Although unsupported / undocumented, using FN_DBLOG(..) is inevitable.

While retrieving [RowLog Contents 0]/ [Log Record] transaction log information
I encounter a possible limitation regarding the size of the fetched data.
There is a suspect that data exceeding 8000 bytes is truncated.

I do not manage to get more than 8000 bytes - neither at the Studio Management Query pane nor with a programmatic ODBC piece of code.
There is more data for sure - no doubt about that!!

Does anybody have any idea?
Thanks
/H

View 1 Replies View Related

Limitations To The MSDN Vs Of SQL 2000?

Feb 2, 2007

Are there any limits to the number of user that can connect or anything like that with SQL 2000 (MSDN Vs)?

Thanks!

View 1 Replies View Related

Sql Sever 2000 Develloper Version Limitations

Jan 13, 2005

I installed SQL Server 2000 Develloper version and I am wondering what are the limitation of this version compare to the other versions available? Like how many connections can I have open at the same time? Can I use it for my intranet application? etc...
Thanks

View 1 Replies View Related

How To Add Record Into SQL Server 2000?

Aug 13, 2004

How can I add the record into my company SQL Server 2000 database from the website register page???

This is my codes:
<%
Dim sql,rs

Dim objConn
Set objConn = Server.CreateObject("ADODB.Connection")
objConn.Open "Provider=Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0;" & _
"Data Source=c:InetPubwwwrootdalyfpdbmarket.mdb"

sql="INSERT INTO testing (fname,lname)"
sql=sql & " VALUES "
sql=sql & "('Shawn', 'mike')"

objConn.Execute sql
objConn.close
%>

This is my error:
Microsoft JET Database Engine error '80004005'

Operation must use an updateable query.

/VITA_SHOW/test_VITAFormhandler.asp, line 137


Thank you very much!!!

Shawn
scn@daly.com

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL 2000 Could Not Redo Log Record

Apr 10, 2007

SQL 2000 std installed SP4 - cannot open SQL on server - error could not redo log record - model database. cannot load enterprise manager or query analyzer to try and resolve error.

have tried to repair sql by loading 2000 cdrom but only asks if you wish to repair registry hive - have done so and rebooted server - still cannot open SQL

Please advise

View 2 Replies View Related

Getting Record Position In Sql Server 2000

Mar 25, 2008

hii am using SQL server 2000. I want to know the record position whileretrieving records. its like row_number() in sql server 2005Is it possible?

View 5 Replies View Related

Updating A Record On A SQL 6.5 From Data In SQL 2000 Server

Sep 30, 2004

I need to update one row in a SQL Server 6.5 DB from a row in SQL 2000 server DB. What would be the best way to do this?


I have my 2000 server defined as a Remote Server in 6.5, however I get the error message:

contains more than the maximum number of prefixes. The maximum is 2.

View 9 Replies View Related

SQL 2000 Corrupted Record! Can't Delete Table

May 9, 2008

Hi All,

I have just one corrupted record on a table: I copied everything else to another table but I can't delete or rename the old one!

Is restoring the whole DB my only way out there?

Any help or suggestion would be much appreciated!

Cheers

View 8 Replies View Related

Limitations In SQL?

Feb 27, 2006

I'm new to SQL so don't laugh if this is easy to spot but I'm having trouble with a select statement but I do not think it's the syntax etc, I'm convinced it must be due to some restrictions and limitations within SQL.

Could anyone shed some light? I've been 'googling' for two days now and can't find anything, much appreciated! thanks.


SELECT a.medno_id,
tblAction.action_shortdesc,
tblClassification.class_shortdesc,
tblType.type_shortdesc,
tblUnit.unit_shortdesc,
tblSystem.system_shortdesc,
a.med_oldserial,
a.med_builddate,
tblLibrary.lib_shortdesc,
a.med_f24bookno,
a.med_f24entry,
a.med_f102bookno,
a.med_f102entry,
tblTransport.trans_shortdesc,
a.med_courierno,
tblPOC.poc_surname,
a.med_title,
a.med_notes

FROM tblMedia a

INNER JOIN tblAction ON a.action_id = tblAction.action_id
INNER JOIN tblClassification ON a.class_id = tblClassification.class_id
INNER JOIN tblType ON a.type_id = tblType.type_id
INNER JOIN tblUnit ON a.unit_id = tblUnit.unit_id
INNER JOIN tblSystem ON a.system_id = tblSystem.system_id
INNER JOIN tblLibrary ON a.lib_id = tblLibrary.lib_id
INNER JOIN tblTransport ON a.trans_id = tblTransport.trans_id
INNER JOIN tblPOC ON a.poc_id = tblPOC.poc_id

WHERE a.medno_id = 327
ORDER BY a.med_effdate


I've spaced out the query so it's easy to read

I've started the query from scratch building my SQL adding one field at a time and it works perfect until it reaches a certain number of fields, it's as if SQL has a limit to no of fields it can return/be used in the select part of the statement. Are there any limitations I should know about? or am I being an idiot and doing something I shouldn't?

Hope this makes sense, thanks!

View 3 Replies View Related

Limitations

May 11, 2006

What are the limitations of the SQL 2005 Express Management Studio tools, as opposed to the full blown 2k5 Tools (i'm not referring to the Server, just the tools). I ask because the install for the 2005 Management Studio Tools alone is 878 megs.

View 1 Replies View Related

CE Limitations?

Feb 27, 2008

Hi.

I've been using CE 3.1 in a .NET/C# application. My knowledge of database technology is very basic, and I'm wondering how far I can take my application with CE, given its limitations, which I stumbled across when I read the following about VistaDB: http://www.vistadb.net/compare_sql_compact.asp

For right now, my application uses a CE database as a fancy log file. There are only two tables in the database -- one to hold the log information, and one to hold information about different "runs" of my application. The only time a row is ever updated is when a row in the latter table is updated (once) to indicate that that "run" has completed. Other than that, I only add and delete rows.

Right now, two different processes on the same CPU (the same CPU as the database) write rows to the database during a run of my application. They do this by accessing a singleton object, hosted in a Windows service, via .NET remoting. One of these processes also polls the database continually to read it for display purposes.

So. My questions are:

I can live with the single-user limitation, given my application. But what exactly is it about using CE that limits me to a single user? I never actually specify user information, as far as I know. Am I missing it?

Can I assume that the "single CPU supported" limitation simply means that it only runs on a 32-bit Windows machine, and that it has nothing to do with multiple databases running on different CPUs at runtime?

Why is it that the two processes in my application seem to be able to connect to my database concurrently, when this is apparently a limitation?
As I said, my knowledge of this technology is quite elemental. Forgive me. But I figure I'm in the right place to change that. :-)

Thanks.

Mike

View 1 Replies View Related

TransactionScope Limitations And MS DTC

Nov 15, 2007

I am receiving an error message while using the System.Transactions.TransactionScope class.  The error message that I am receiving is "Communication with the underlying transaction manager has failed".  This error seems to only appear when I have my web application one server, Server1,  and my database on a second, Server2.  When I run the web app on the same server as the database (i.e., web site and database on Server2), I don't receive this error.  So, this leads me to believe this has something to do with MS DTC.   Is there a limit to how much data MS DTC can manage for a given transaction?  If so, is it configurable? When I run my code, the application fails after a certain number of steps (this is repeatable). See sample code below.  When I execute the code below, the error occurs on UpdateBody2();.  If I comment out UpdateBody2(), the error will now occur on UpdateBody3();, and so on.  This leads me to believe that I have hit some upper limit. My code follows a pattern similar to this:using {TransactionScope scope = new TransactionScope()){    UpdateHeader();    UpdateBody1();    UpdateBody2();    UpdateBody3();    UpdateFooter();}Where each of the classes follows a pattern of:UpdateHeader(){    using (SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection())    {    conn.Open();    // Do something     conn.Close();     } } Environment:ASP.NET 2.0SQL/2005 StandardWindows Server 2003  Thanks.Steve 

View 3 Replies View Related

MSDE Limitations

Jun 22, 2004

I'd like to use MSDE since it's free instead of SQL Server for my database. I will be hosting a portal type site. If all goes well and my site is wildly successful are there any limitations in MSDE that I need to worry about?

For instance, I thought there was a limit to the number of connections. I thought I remember seeing 5 or 50 on the microsoft download site.

If there is a connection limit of say 10, what happens when connection 11 comes in? Does it just wait for a free connection or does it fail?

Is anyone using is as the database on a large portal site? How many users are there in total? How many connected at the same time?

I am under the assumption that it is SQL Server underneath, so I assume the performance and abilities are very good. Is this a fair assumption?

Thanks for the input

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL Express Limitations

Jun 6, 2006

    Hi, I was curious if anyone knew if there was a way to get around SQL Express Edition 2005's limitations to support remote connections.  If I install SQL Server 2005, will there be a smooth transition between the two on my IIS 5.1 server?  My database is extremely simple and only consists of a single table without any complex queries.  Idealy, I would like to spend no money since I am a poor collge student doing this as a project.  Suggestions?

View 9 Replies View Related

Access Limitations

Jan 20, 1999

Does anyone know the limitations of access in records?

CZ

View 1 Replies View Related

Varchar Limitations

May 18, 2004

I updated a varchar field fom 500 length to 800 and now nothing works. Are there limitations to how big a varchar table entry can be and if so what is the alternative?

Cheers

View 2 Replies View Related

Limitations In A Query !!

Aug 2, 2006

Hi all there,I'm a newbee to this forum. I've a question, is there any limitationon "IN" clause in select query.for example :"SELECT EMP_ID, EMP_NAME FROM EMPLOYEE WHERE EMP_ID IN('EMP1001','EMP1002','EMP1003', etc, etc, so on)".I've read at some documentation that there is a limitation for Columnsin a table and i.e. we can have only 1024 columns per table, is thistrue?Plz help me !!Thanx in advance.Kind Regards,Harry

View 4 Replies View Related

Limitations, Compatibility

Nov 29, 2006

Hi,
What are the limitations of using the automated conversion tool and how to deal with compatability issues?
Thanks

View 2 Replies View Related

SSMS-EE Limitations

Dec 12, 2007



Is it possible someone could let me know the exact differences between the SSMS Express Edition and SSMS Standard Edition?

Just simply what you cannot do in the Express edition but can in the full edition.

Thanks

View 7 Replies View Related

FTP Task Limitations

Oct 3, 2006

Hi,

I'm thinking about using the FTP task in an integration i am developing, but before i do, i need to get an idea that what i want to do is possible.

With the FTP task could i get a list of directories on the FTP server, and compare the folders with a result set returned from a SQL query. If any of the directories on the FTP site then i want to download each of the relevent directories and there contents to the local machine.

Could someone give me an idea as to if this is possible via the task, or if indeed a script task would be better?

Many thanks,

Grant

View 7 Replies View Related

CPU Limitations Of SQL Express

May 12, 2006

I had a question about the CPU limitations of SQL express. It says limited to 1 CPU but what if I have multiple instaces since the application is a new service and runs in it 'sown memory space how is it limited to 1 CPU? does the service use multiple processors and the queris are binded to one?



Thanks

View 4 Replies View Related

SQL Express RAM &&amp; CPU Limitations

Mar 10, 2008

With the limitation of 1Gb of ram and 1 CPU for SQL Express, does that mean we cannot load it on a server with multiple CPU's and more ram, or that we can load it and it will only use 1CPU and 1Gb of ram?

View 7 Replies View Related

Users And Limitations

Feb 10, 2006

can sqlExpress handle 200 users all at the same time?

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server XE Limitations

Jul 9, 2006

Hi,

As SQL Server XE can run on one PC maximum, does it mean that it can't support multi users??? I mean could it be installed on one server and to be used by multiple users connected to server with their PCs?

thanks in advance

View 8 Replies View Related

SQL Server Limitations

Aug 31, 2006



what are the limitations in MS SQL Server Express (for a network application)?



View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server Express Limitations

Jun 21, 2006

I was looking around, and I found this info on SQL Server Express:The 4 GB database size limit applies only to data files and not to log
files. However, there are no limits to the number of databases that can be
attached to the server.Does this mean I can use several different databases in my website, like one separate db containing forum entries, and one with user details and related stuff?

View 4 Replies View Related

Identity Column Limitations

Nov 27, 2000

Is there a numeric limitation to using the identity value, or is it limited by the integer data type limitation

View 1 Replies View Related

Practical Limitations With SQL Server

Oct 12, 2000

We are primarily a DB2 and Oracle shop. There are movements towards SQL Server for smaller applications. We would like to know if anyone out there has shop standards in determining which database should go with what type of application. What we are looking for are possibly database sizes, number of concurrent users, hardware and software cost, network infrastructure, security, scalability, and development tools. Any information would be appreciated.

View 1 Replies View Related

How To Overcome Xp_cmdshell Limitations?

Mar 6, 2008

Hi.

I really need to call an external application with GUI but xp_cmdshell does not allow it. Is there any way to do this?

Thanks in advance for replays.

View 3 Replies View Related

CAL Licensing And User Limitations?

May 13, 2006

Hi to everyone, probably it's a faq but I did not find a sure answer.A customer has a Sql Server 2000 standard installed in 1server/5CALlicensing mode, in a windows 2000 server.Does this type of installation limit the further connections (occourred insame or distinct sql accounts) that exceed the 5 client/user?And if this connections aren't limited, are these further connectionspenalized by the query governor like MSDE does?In short, is the CAL licensing mode only a legal issue without affecting orlimiting the performance of the exceeding connections?Thanks in advance,Pas!

View 1 Replies View Related

How To Create An Admin With Some Limitations?

Aug 17, 2007

I've a SQL 2005 with a certain number of db.Until today i was the only admin of all dbs.Now i need to give to another admin permission to manage one specificdb (but only that).Ho censito un utente di sql con accessi abilitati solo a quel db.If i connect to Enterprise manager with that limited login there is aproblem: i see (only see)all dbs, also db where this login is not autorized.How can i work for not permitting this login to see other dbs? Heonlycan see them but idon't want because of privacy. Is it possible?

View 4 Replies View Related

Practical Limitations Of SQL Server?

Jul 20, 2005

Hi all,I'm looking for some ball park estimates on when SQL Server might startto break down, and can't find any reliable info. Any insight is appreciated.Basically, the situation is this: The database structure is very simple;just one table with about 15 columns and about 60-75 million rows. There'sno need for massaging data or complex relations, just simple searches onmaybe a max of 5 columns. Out of the gates we'll be looking at having 30concurrent users and rapidly expanding to about 300-400 concurrent users.I might need to rebuild the database on a daily or weekly basisdepending on how often changes are made to a master file. In the past I'vebeen bit in the butt with the absolute crappiness of SQL Server'sreplication, so I'm going to try to avoid that path if I can (plus I alreadyhave some scripts written to delete and rebuild a similar database on anightly basis). Would it be practical to destroy and rebuild a database thissize on a daily basis?The big question is if searching 60-75 million records is practical inSQL server. If so, what kind of machine would I need to get a nearly instantresponse time per search (.2 second or so) when everyone's banging on it atonce? How many concurrent users can I expect to be able to practicallysupport before SQL Server will start to bog down? Thanks for your thoughts,-Ringo

View 3 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved