Recovery :: AG Automatic Failover Using FCI

Jun 24, 2015

I'd like to understand why it is not possible to automatic Failover Availability Groups using Failover Cluster Instances. I think it would be great for DR and HA. Do you understand why that limitation exists?

The link [URL] ....

SQL Server Failover Cluster Instances (FCIs) do not support automatic failover by availability groups, so any availability replica that is hosted by an FCI can only be configured for manual failover.

View 4 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Recovery :: AlwaysOn Failover Cluster And Active Sessions Failover Scenario

Oct 29, 2015

1. In alwaysON fail over cluster, Once fail over to secondary replica, what will happen to connected session in primary node? can the session fail over to secondary seamlessly or need to re-login. what happen committed transactions which has not write to disk.

2. Assume I have always on cluster with three nodes, if primary fails, how second node make write/ read mode.

3. After fail over done to 2nd secondary node what mode in production(readonly or read write).

4. How to rollback to production primary ,will change data in secondary will get updated in primary.

View 3 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Server Local High Availability Using Failover Cluster And Disaster Recovery Using AlwaysOn

Aug 17, 2015

We have a requirement to build SQL environment which will give us local high availability and disaster recovery to second site. We have two sites- Site A & Site B. We are planning to have two nodes at Site A and 2 nodes at Site B. All four nodes will be part of same Windows failover cluster. We will build two SQL Cluster, InstanceA will be clustered between the nodes at Site A Server and InstanceB will be clustered between the nodes at Site B, we will enable Always On Between the InstanceA and InstanceB and will be primary owner where data will be written on InstanceA and will be replicated to InstaceB. URL....Now we want we will have instanceC on the Site B and data will be writen from the application available on Site B, will be replicated to the instance on the Site A as replica.

View 6 Replies View Related

Automatic Failover

May 25, 2008

Hi there,
I am testing the db mirroring, making sure it will auto failover. I've stopped the SQL services on my principal and then I looked at the mirror db is says it's restoring. It stayed like that for 10 min before I enabled the mirroring again. Anyone knows why it's not failing over??????


Here's my setup: SQL 2005 Standard, Server 1 Principal, Server 2 Mirror & Witness.

View 4 Replies View Related

Automatic Failover... Help

Jan 25, 2007

Hi there,

We've recently set up a Principle, Mirror and Witness configuration with the Mirror and Witness in a separate building to the Principle. All three are part of the same domain (DMZ) and are different servers, the buildings are connected via a fiber optic cable. All servers and SQL Server instances are logged in with the same domain admin account DMZesAdmin.

Mirroring is all set-up and the databases are synchronized. Every once in a while some (not all, normally 6 out of 15) databases will switch roles and become active on the mirror. The SQL Server mirroring monitor job then reports:

Date  25/01/2007 12:37:01
Log  Job History (Database Mirroring Monitor Job)

Step ID  1
Server  DMZSQL01
Job Name  Database Mirroring Monitor Job
Step Name  
Duration  00:00:02
Sql Severity  16
Sql Message ID  32038
Operator Emailed  
Operator Net sent  
Operator Paged  
Retries Attempted  0

Message
Executed as user: DMZesadmin. An internal error has occurred in the database mirroring monitor. [SQLSTATE 42000] (Error 32038).  The step failed.

I have no idea, what causes the failover, it could be a slow network or a bad set-up, can anyone give me some ideas of what to do to track down the problem or any experience of what could be causing this, it happens randomly every day or three. No warning and if I go to the mirror and failover back to the principle again then it's all just fine. However I don't want half my databases working on 1 server and half on the other.

Any ideas?

Thanks
Ed



 

UPDATE:

I've just been looking at the logs on my Mirror and at the same time it reports in this order

Error: 1479, Severity: 16, State: 1.

The mirroring connection to "TCP://DMZSQL01.dmz.local:5022" has timed out for database "WARCMedia" after 10 seconds without a response.  Check the service and network connections.

Database mirroring is inactive for database 'WARCMedia'. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.

Recovery is writing a checkpoint in database 'WARCMedia' (41). This is an informational message only. No user action is required.

The mirrored database "WARCMedia" is changing roles from "PRINCIPAL" to "MIRROR" due to Failover.

Database mirroring is inactive for database 'WARCMedia'. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.

...

 

This looks like a time out, is there any way to set the TimeOut threashold for Database mirroring or set retry intervals??

View 5 Replies View Related

Automatic Failover Problem

Sep 7, 2007

Setup Configuration:

3 servers
- PRINCIPAL IP: 10.2.5.31 - DNS Lookup: db-server-2.mosside.choruscall.com
- MIRROR IP: 10.2.5.30 - DNS Lookup: sql-mirror.mosside.choruscall.com
- WITNESS ip: 10.2.5.32 - DNS Lookup: sql-witness.mosside.choruscall.com

Each Server is running Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition with SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Edition.
All server instances are enabled for remote connections(By default they are not).
All servers have the flag 1400 traceon and have been restarted.
PORT 5022 is unrestricted on network.

The server instances are connecting via certificates. Each server has an endpoint for the certificates to to connect on.


Certificate Setup Proceedure:

Principal_Host:

1. Create Master Key with Password

2. Create certificate with subject

3. Create endpoint for certificate (Listener_Port = 5022, Listener_ip = all)
to connect on for database_mirroring

4. Backup Certificate (principal_cert.cer)

5. Take backed up certificate to Mirror_Host

(Reapeat Steps 1-5 for Witness and Mirror)


Mirror_Host: Create Certificate on Mirror_Host for inbound connections from Principal:

6.(On Mirror_Host) Create Login for Principal using same password in step 1 (principal_login)

7. Create user for login just created. (principal_user)

8. Create local certificate for Principal on Mirror using certificate generated by principal.

ex: Create Certificate Principal_cert Authorization Principal_user FROM FILE='c:principal_cert.cer'

9. (If an endpoint has been created already on the mirror)Grant connectiion to the login:

ex: Grant connect on endpoint::mirror_endpoint to principal_login

Repeat Steaps 6-9 for Principal and Witness Servers accordingly.


10. Import Database to SQL Server 2005 Principal Instance

11. Backup Database to disk with format

12. Backup Database log file to disk with format

13. Copy backups to mirror

14. Restore Database and log file with norecovery on Mirror_Host

15. Configre Database for Database Mirroring on Principal Server

There are two ways to do this. Via the wizzard or via the Transact-SQL window.
Using the wizzard appears to work since I started using FQDN.

PROBLEM:

After configuration, everythig appears to be correct. That is, the principal displays
that it is the principal and it is synchronized with the mirror. The mirror also displays that it is the
mirror and it is synchronized with the principal and it is in recovery. If I failover manually, the mirror
becomes the principal and the principal becomes the mirror (They form a quarum). If I disconnect the principal
from the network, the mirror is supposed to form a quarum with the witness and promote itself to principal status.
This is not what is happening. The witness recognizes that the principal is down and logs that info into its log file.
The Mirror attempts to contact the witness but cannot log onto the machine. The Mirror Logs the following:

Error: 1438, Severity: 16, State: 2.
The server instance Witness rejected configure request; read its error log file for more information.
The reason 1451, and state 3, can be of use for diagnostics by Microsoft.
This is a transient error hence retrying the request is likely to succeed.
Correct the cause if any and retry.




<<<<<<<MIRROR SERVER >>>>>>>>

2007-09-06 15:08:45.32 spid23s Error: 1438, Severity: 16, State: 2.
2007-09-06 15:08:45.32 spid23s The server instance Witness rejected configure request; read its error log file for more information. The reason 1451, and state 3, can be of use for diagnostics by Microsoft. This is a transient error hence retrying the request is likely to succeed. Correct the cause if any and retry.
2007-09-06 15:09:05.32 spid23s Error: 1438, Severity: 16, State: 2.
2007-09-06 15:09:05.32 spid23s The server instance Witness rejected configure request; read its error log file for more information. The reason 1451, and state 3, can be of use for diagnostics by Microsoft. This is a transient error hence retrying the request is likely to succeed. Correct the cause if any and retry.
2007-09-06 15:09:25.33 spid23s Error: 1438, Severity: 16, State: 2.
2007-09-06 15:09:25.33 spid23s The server instance Witness rejected configure request; read its error log file for more information. The reason 1451, and state 3, can be of use for diagnostics by Microsoft. This is a transient error hence retrying the request is likely to succeed. Correct the cause if any and retry.
2007-09-06 15:09:45.34 spid23s Error: 1438, Severity: 16, State: 2.
2007-09-06 15:09:45.34 spid23s The server instance Witness rejected configure request; read its error log file for more information. The reason 1451, and state 3, can be of use for diagnostics by Microsoft. This is a transient error hence retrying the request is likely to succeed. Correct the cause if any and retry.
2007-09-06 15:10:05.35 spid23s Error: 1438, Severity: 16, State: 2.
2007-09-06 15:10:05.35 spid23s The server instance Witness rejected configure request; read its error log file for more information. The reason 1451, and state 3, can be of use for diagnostics by Microsoft. This is a transient error hence retrying the request is likely to succeed. Correct the cause if any and retry.
2007-09-06 15:10:25.36 spid23s Error: 1438, Severity: 16, State: 2.



<<<<<<< WITNESS SERVER >>>>>>>>

2007-09-06 14:19:55.90 spid52 The Database Mirroring protocol transport is now listening for connections.
2007-09-06 15:07:11.64 spid24s Error: 1479, Severity: 16, State: 1.
2007-09-06 15:07:11.64 spid24s The mirroring connection to "TCP://db-server-2:5022" has timed out for database "APS_SQL_DEV" after 10 seconds without a response. Check the service and network connections.
2007-09-06 15:07:43.20 Server Error: 1474, Severity: 16, State: 1.
2007-09-06 15:07:43.20 Server Database mirroring connection error 4 '64(The specified network name is no longer available.)' for 'TCP://db-server-2:5022'.
2007-09-06 15:08:06.03 spid9s Error: 1474, Severity: 16, State: 1.
2007-09-06 15:08:06.03 spid9s Database mirroring connection error 2 'Connection attempt failed with error: '10060(A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond.)'.' for 'TCP://db-server-2:5022'.

View 4 Replies View Related

Automatic Failover Failure

Nov 27, 2006

Hello,

we're running a mirrored database with High Availability for Automatic failover including a Witness instance for a web application.

When doing a manual failover on the database in Management studio, the roles are switched correctly and the database is in "Principal, Synchronized" and "Mirror, Synchronized/Restoring" mode. The web application has no problems switching servers by using client failover with the jdbc driver. There is no problem accessing the database with Management Studio.

However, if we stop the SQL service on the Principal server the role is automatically failed over to the Mirror server by the Witness. The database is then in the mode "Principal, Disconnected" which should be fine. However, accessing the database from the web application or with Management Studio yields some strange results. It is not possible to write to the database, and reading from the database works inconsistently (the web application seems like it can do it, but not from the Management Studio).

Starting the SQL service on the former Principal server makes the database go into mode "Mirror, Synchronizing/Restoring" and "Principal, Synchronizing". And it will stay that way indefinitely. There are not that many updates/transactions made to the database that can make it stay in this state, especially if you can't write to the database in the first place.

The next step taken after being stuck in this state is to stop the SQL service on the Mirror (former Principal), restart the service on the Principal (former Mirror). Accessing the database now works. The database is in mode "Principal, Disconnected". Starting the SQL service on the Mirror (former Principal) makes the database go into the normal "Principal, Synchronized" and "Mirror, Synchronized/Restoring" mode. Access to database is normal.

The same erroneous behaviour can be observed by unplugging the network cable on the Principal server, so it seems like we can only get a smooth transition by doing a manual failover.

Any ideas on what might be the problem? Has anybody experienced a similar situation?

View 6 Replies View Related

Login Error After Automatic Failover

Nov 29, 2006

I have setup a mirror configuration with a witness to be able to use the automatic failover. The principal is DBSP01, the mirror is DBSP02 and the witness is DBSP03. I have an application running an DBCP01. When the mirroring is working, the application can connect to the database on DBSP01. I disconnect dbsp01 from the network, so that DBSP02 becomes the principal. When I try to connect the application to the database on DBSP02, the login fails. Whithout the mirroring I was able to logon to DBSP02, but as soon as it is part of the mirroring, I'm not able to connect to it anymore, whatever the state of the database is. What could be the problem? Can anybody help?

Remco

View 2 Replies View Related

Availability Group Not Ready For Automatic Failover

Dec 21, 2014

I am getting alerts as Availability group not ready for automatic failover , how to check and resolve the issue ?

How to check the databases status whether they are in sync unsync in High availability ?

View 6 Replies View Related

3 Node 2014 AlwaysOn - Automatic Failover?

Jun 30, 2015

I have a 3 node 2014 AlwaysOn setup. The primary and secondary are set for automatic failover. The third node, of course, is manual (until 2016). The 2 nodes with are automatic are sitting in one datacenter, the third is in another. If the first datacenter was to go down, I would manually have to failover to the third node? What's the normal process here for having two datacenters and ensuring the availability group is always available?

View 3 Replies View Related

How Best To Tackle Logins With SQL Authentication After Automatic Failover

Aug 8, 2007

In an sql authentication environment with an automatic failover in database mirroring how to you manage new logins which have been created on the principle since the start of mirroring? Since the master cannot be mirrored, and the mirror database cannot be read during mirroring (except as a snapshot) in order to find the missing logins, I assume that only after failover a script should run to create the new logins and then run sp_change_users_login . The qestions are:

1) should the script create a new login first and then run sp_change_users_login with option update_one , or should sp_change_users_login using option

Auto_Fix create the missing logins?














2) But what is the password of these users? is it initially NULL , as a consequence of sp_change_users_login? What about the SIDs?

3) Or should we bypass sp_change_users_login altogether and use






CREATE LOGIN <loginname> WITH PASSWORD = <password>, SID = <sid for same login on principal server>,...as described in http://blogs.msdn.com/chadboyd/archive/2007/01/05/login-failures-connecting-to-new-principal-after-failover-using-database-mirroring.aspx



4) What is the event that would trigger this script to run after the aitomatic failover ?

Is there a definitive MIcrosoft agreed apon and recommended method to tackle this?



View 3 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: AlwaysOn Local HA With Second Site Automatic Failover

Apr 3, 2014

I'm looking for a solution to have cross data center automatic failover in the event of a data center loss for highly critical databases. I would like to have local HA and also automatic failover to the DR site. This does not seem possible with AlwaysOn.

Is my only option for automatic cross data center failover to build a node in one data center and a node in the other data center with a node/FS at a third data center in order to maintain quorum? I'd like to have local HA in the mix but that doesn't seem possible.What pattern for the highest data security and also availability?

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: Availability Group Is Not Ready For Automatic Failover

Dec 19, 2014

how to resolve and trouble shoot the availability group is not ready for automatic failover in sql2012

View 4 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: Conditions Required For Automatic Failover On AlwaysOn?

Oct 27, 2015

An automatic failover set exists. This set consists of a primary replica and a secondary replica (the automatic failover target) that are both configured for synchronous-commit mode and set to AUTOMATIC failover.Configured the both AG Group database automatic failover and synchronous-commit mode.But automatic Failover failed also Cluster service not started automatically at Node2. It got connected through AO Listerner after starting Node1. As below SQL Error log during shutdown Node1

Date,Source,Severity,Message
10/27/2015 10:44:20,spid37s,Unknown,AlwaysOn Availability Groups: Waiting for local Windows Server Failover Clustering node to come online. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
10/27/2015 10:44:20,spid37s,Unknown,AlwaysOn Availability Groups: Local Windows Server Failover Clustering node started.

[code]....

what need to be change existing AO configuration?

View 9 Replies View Related

Getting E-mail Notification After Mirrored Database Automatic Failover

Jul 12, 2007

Hello,

I am a C++/C# developer my SQL skills are very limited.
I have a database set up for mirroring and I would like to get an e-mail notification whenever an Automatic Failover occurs. Can anyone show me how to do this using SQLServer 2005? Please provide T-SQL script sample if possible!



Thanks,



-Agustin

View 7 Replies View Related

SQL Native Client Automatic Failover Only Works When Both Servers Are Plugged In

Dec 9, 2006

I have setup a database mirroring session with witness - MachineA is the principal, MachineB is the mirror, and MachineC is the witness. Each SQL Server instance is hosted on its own machine. The mirroring is working correctly. If I submit data to the database on MachineA, and then unplug the network cable on MachineA, MachineB automatically becomes the principal, and I can see the data that I originally submitted to MachineA on MachineB. All the settings are showing correctly in Management Studio.

My issue is with the SQL Native Client and a front-end application that needs to make use of this database. I have setup my front-end application to use the ODBC client and specified the failover server in both the ODBC setup and the connection string. Here is the connection string that I am using :

Provider=ODBC;Database=master;DSN=MachineA;Failover Partner=MachineB;

Everything works perfectly on my front-end application when MachineA is the principal. If I unplug the network cable on MachineA, MachineB becomes the principal, and the failover occurs correctly on the database side. The problem is that my front-end application is not able to query the database on MachineB.

BUT - if I plug the network cable back in on MachineA (making the database on MachineA the mirror), the front-end application now works and can access the principal database on MachineB. I wrote a quick tester application to verify what I am seeing, and I am convinced that this is what is happening. The mirroring is working perfectly, and everything is setup correctly. The SQL Native Client is setup correctly. The problem is that the automatic failover to MachineB that is built into the SQL Native Client only works if both servers are plugged in.

In this scenario, when I plug both servers in, I know that the front-end app is definitely pulling from MachineB (since the mirror database on MachineA is in recovery mode, it's unavailable, and the front-end app displays the server that it is pulling data from).

Am I using an out-dated SQL Native Client? The version number displayed in the ODBC configuration page is 2005.90.2047.00, and is dated 4/14/2006. Has anyone experienced this issue? I'm guessing that it's a problem in the SQL Native client, since the mirroring really seems to be working correctly.

Thanks,

Bill

View 13 Replies View Related

Automatic Recovery

Mar 28, 2001

Dear Friends,
I want to Automatically take Backup at 7:00 p.m cutoff Time.and automatically restore the database..to a temporary database,generate my report and delete the database.
Friends,this backup & restore should not require any user interface..it should me automatic.
Plz can anyone help me out.

Regards
Salim g belim

View 1 Replies View Related

Urgent Help With Automatic Recovery

Aug 6, 1998

Automatic recovery has taken about 6 hours on our machine before, but it has now be going on for almost 2 days !?!

Has anyone any suggestions?!!

Is there any way to find out what the Auto recovery is doing, if anything? Is it rolling Forward or Backward ?!?

Regards
Jasper
Jarlath.O`Grady@ulsterbank.com

View 1 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Not Able To Failover AG

Oct 15, 2015

Could not able to connect secondary replica below is the error message I am getting when I tried to failover. Cannot connect to VLDBATEAM.

The secondary replica that you selected to become the new primary replica does not belong to the specified availability group. A possible explanation is that the replica has not been joined the availability group.  (Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.HadrTasks)

View 6 Replies View Related

User Database Automatic Recovery

Apr 17, 2001

Hi

Yesterday a user has run a storedprocedure which
updates a very transaction table having million of
records , as usual the user killed the process in the
middle of the execution.(which has resulted in rollback
action).

this rollback process blocked other scheduled jobs and
its was running for more than 8 hours without completing

as usual decided to shutdown and restart the sqlserver
while restarting the sql server went into automatic recovery

the following are the log recording

2001-04-17 12:00:01.86 spid9 Recovery progress on database 'ISH' (7): 48 percent.
2001-04-17 12:00:37.89 spid6 Using 'xpstar.dll' version '1998.11.13' to execute extended stored procedure 'sp_MSgetversion'.
2001-04-17 12:02:36.60 spid9 Recovery progress on database 'ISH' (7): 49 percent.
2001-04-17 12:08:12.79 spid9 Recovery progress on database 'ISH' (7): 49 percent.
2001-04-17 12:11:49.90 spid9 Recovery progress on database 'ISH' (7): 50 percent.
2001-04-17 12:11:50.32 spid9 Recovery progress on database 'ISH' (7): 92 percent.

if you see the log reading from 50% jumps to 92 % and the automatic recovery
process is running from another 5 hours (now not able to open the database)

in order to avoid the sql server going into automatic recovery mode (usually the dba use to update the master.sysdatabase table the status column with some
magic number to set the database into emergency mode) but i followed my own style (deleting the reocord for the user database from sysdatabases)
and restarted the sql server , and used my monday tape backup (complete bkup) to recover the database. In the recovery option i used force restore over existing database (hoping that this will reduce the database recovery time ,bcaus the data file (mdf and ldf ) need not to be created.

but the result :- after running six hours of loading data from tape ( i am getting the following reading in the log file)

2001-04-17 16:15:58.40 spid7 Starting up database 'ISH'.
2001-04-17 16:15:58.40 spid7 Opening file F:DATABASEISH.mdf.
2001-04-17 16:15:58.46 spid7 Opening file F:DatabaseISH_1.mdf.
2001-04-17 16:15:58.48 spid7 Opening file G:Databaseish_5_data_Data.NDF.
2001-04-17 16:15:58.49 spid7 Opening file G:Databasesrv_fg_data1.NDF.
2001-04-17 16:15:58.49 spid7 Opening file G:Databasesrv_fg_data3.NDF.
2001-04-17 16:15:58.53 spid7 Opening file G:Databasesrvindex_fg_data1.NDF.
2001-04-17 16:15:58.54 spid7 Opening file F:DATABASEISH_3.mdf.
2001-04-17 16:15:58.57 spid7 Opening file F:databaseISH_4.mdf.
2001-04-17 16:15:58.59 spid7 Opening file F:databaseISH_2.mdf.
2001-04-17 16:15:58.60 spid7 Opening file G:Databasesrv_fg_data2.NDF.
2001-04-17 16:15:58.62 spid7 Opening file G:DATABASEISH_log.ldf.
2001-04-17 16:15:58.64 spid7 Opening file G:databaseISH_log_1.ldf.
2001-04-17 16:15:58.65 spid7 Bypassing recovery for database 'ISH' because it is marked IN LOAD.

realy do not what is happening in the background.(if its oracle the dba has
the control over the database . In sql server has the control over the dba)

any one who has any idea on sql server recovery (the size of the database is
22 gb which is recovered and tape device is hp sure store DAT 40 E (DSS-4,4MM TAPE). Thanks in advance

Have a good day (not for me laaa)

Sethu

View 1 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Automatic Trace Getting Created

Aug 17, 2015

I am looking at one of the SQL Server which I inherited from my predecessor at work place and I can see a Trace file is getting created on the Log folder. 

There has been manual script in place (Written by Greg Larsen) - to monitor DB AutoGrowth, LogFile Growth etc. 

I am unable to find out which process or Stored Procedure or Query is creating the Trace file which is created every day and gets deleted and replaced with a new one. 

View 2 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Failover Clustering 2008R2

Jul 22, 2015

I tested the failover clustering for SQL 2008R2.When I stop the SQL server services manully, the failover did not fail to another resource. At the Faiolover cluster manager, SQl server(MSSQLSERVER)  only show the status for offline. I think it should be move to another owner intead of just show as offline.

View 3 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Failover Cluster Setup

May 8, 2015

I am using SQL 2012 SE with clustering on Windows server 2008 R2. Now I want migrate it to windows server 2012 with minimal down time. So I want to evict the passive node and add a new node with windows server 2012 and install sql server 2012 SE on the new passive node and perform a failover(make the node with 2012 OS as active) and then evict the new passive node and add another node with windows 2012 and then do the same thing?

View 12 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Error When Setting Up Failover Cluster

Aug 26, 2015

I'm getting the following error when I go to create a cluster in the Failover Cluster Manager in Windows Server 2008.

"The address 10.10.10.111 is not valid for its associated network"

I'm following the instruction in the book for the 70-462 exam.  There was a step that had me create a DNS A record for the address sql-cluster.contoso.com.  The IP address was mapped to 10.10.10.111.  I'm not sure if this is the culprit but its the only time I used that IP address in the setup.

Below are 2 screenshots.  The first screenshot is the error.  The second screenshot is my DNS console.

View 7 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Setup FILESTREAM On Failover Cluster

Apr 22, 2015

I saw following point on Technet article about RBS.The local FILESTREAM provider is supported only when it is used on local hard disk drives or an attached Internet Small Computer System Interface (iSCSI) device. You cannot use the local RBS FILESTREAM provider on remote storage devices such as network attached storage (NAS).It looks like that we cannot use FILESTREAM on Failover Cluster because to setup Failover Cluster we need to have NAS. But then the NAS is made available locally for Failover Cluster so FILESTREAM should work right?Found another article which talks about setting up FILESTREAM on Failover Cluster. URL...

View 2 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Failover Scenario With Asynchronous Status

Nov 16, 2015

I have availability group with  3 node

2 in prod env and other one in DR

all replica configure with Asynchronous status 

I would like to test fail-over first scenario prod env i would like to trying  shutdown primary server and move to replica in prod.

I should move to replica prod from cluster service management or from SQL management studio

if i do it from cluster manager do you have power shell script for that
if i do it from SQL management studio i need the command

View 2 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Application Not Able To Connect To Listener Name Soon After Failover

Aug 14, 2015

After manual AG fail-over from primary to secondary the application is not able to connect the listener name for atleast for 5 - 10 mins

The telnet fails during this time from app server, the listener ip is on muti-subnet.

At the same when i try to connect it from SSMS from a remote machine it works fine.

View 2 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Add Client Software To Failover Cluster?

Jul 17, 2015

The main objective is to have a third party program operate on a failover cluster.  The OS is Windows Server 2012 Datacenter loaded on 2 nodes. A virtual node exists along with supporting disks. This client software uses a SQL Server database.  SQL Server 2012 Enterprise is installed and operating in a failover environment.  However the client software is not failing over. If the connection to node A is lost, SQL Server fails over to node B.  But the client application does not. 

What needs to occur in order to associate the client software with the failover cluster?  This software has 6 services total installed. Some are referred to as servers - looks like to communicate between remote client computers and the database. What is the process to associate the client software with the failover?

View 6 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Failover Cluster With Mirroring With AlwaysOn?

Jun 30, 2015

we have to build high availability SQL 2012 cluster for VDI and we have two options. One option is to build a server cluster with combination of failover and mirroring and other option is to build failover cluster with AlwaysOn.We are not sure which option to chose. We have contacted Microsoft support to provide us some documents and instructions for failovermirroring combination but they have send us instructions for AlwaysOn option.

What would be best way to build high availability cluster for VDI? Also, since first option is very complicated.

View 5 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Unable To Connect Listener After Manual Failover

Jun 22, 2015

I am not able to connect listener after manual failover.

(This is test environment)

Server1,Server3 -> Both synchronous (Within Same data center)
Server 3 -> Async (At DR location) -Forced Failover

Test1:
Failover Server1 to Server2 --> Able to connect Listener
Failover Server2 to Server1--> Able to connect Listener.
Failover Server1 to Server3--> Able to connect Listener.
Failover Server3 to Server1 or 2 --> Unable to connect Listener. Unable to ping Listener.
Failover Server 1or2 to Server3--> Able to connect Listener.

I am using below sub-nets:
10.11.192.0/22      10.11.192.130
10.12.192.0/22      10.12.192.140

View 3 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Service Pack Installation In Failover Cluster?

May 9, 2015

I want to install service pack 3 to my SQL Server 2012 Enterprise running on windows server 2008 R2 Enterprise fail over cluster, I read about the SP installation in technet, its mentioned that the passive node should be patched first and to do this the passive node should be removed from the cluster, I need to know whether I should completely remove the node from windows cluster or remove the node by using SQL Server installer and install the service pack and then add it back to the cluster, Can I do this by pausing the node in cluster and perform the service pack installation ?

View 3 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Error Adding Replica To AlwaysOn Failover Cluster?

May 22, 2015

I'm getting an error adding Replica to SQL AlwaysOn failover cluster in the new availability group wizard.  When I enter the name of the target node (secondary replica) server and press connect, I get the following:   

A network-related or instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to SQL Server. 

The server was not found or was not accessible. Verify that the instance name is correct and that SQL Server is configured to allow remote connections. (provider: Named Pipes Provider, error: 40 - Could not open a connection to SQL Server) (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 2) The system cannot fine the file specified

The SQL Browser service is up and running on the target.  I am using an Azure VM for my SQL instance.  This cluster spans geographies from our on-premise site to Azure via a VPN.  This is a multi-subnet cluster. I'm attempting to create a new AG from the primary replica node and the target is a node on Azure called SSASNodeAz03. 

[URL]

Full error:

Connect to Server
Cannot connect to ssasnodeaz03

Additional information: A network-related or instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to SQL Server. 

The server was not found or was not accessible. Verify that the instance name is correct and that SQL Server is configured to allow remote connections. (provider: Named Pipes Provider, error: 40 - Could not open a connection to SQL Server) (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 2) The system cannot fine the file specified

View 8 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Cluster Failover - Failed To Bring Secondary Node Online?

Oct 19, 2010

Server : Windows server 2008
DB Server : SQL Server 2008 (SP1)
 
Here are the series of events which happened.

1.) Event ID: 1135
Cluster node 'XYZ' was removed from the active failover cluster membership. The Cluster service on this node may have stopped. This could also be due to the node having lost communication with other active nodes in the failover cluster. Run the Validate a Configuration wizard to check your network configuration. If the condition persists, check for hardware or software errors related to the network adapters on this node. Also check for failures in any other network components to which the node is connected such as hubs, switches, or bridges.

2.) Event ID: 1049
Cluster IP address resource 'SQL IP Address 1 (XYZ)' cannot be brought online because a duplicate IP address '10.9.8.113' was detected on the network.  Please ensure all IP addresses are unique.

3.) Event ID: 1069
Cluster resource 'SQL IP Address 1 (XYZ)' in clustered service or application 'SQL Server (MSSQLSERVER)' failed.

4.) Event ID: 1049
Cluster IP address resource 'Cluster IP Address' cannot be brought online because a duplicate IP address '10.9.8.112' was detected on the network.  Please ensure all IP addresses are unique.

5.) Event ID: 1069
Cluster resource 'Cluster IP Address' in clustered service or application 'Cluster Group' failed.

6.) Event ID: 1066
Cluster disk resource 'Cluster Disk 25' indicates corruption for volume '?Volume{88552e6f-aea2-11df-9790-0026b92fffa7}'. Chkdsk is being run to repair problems. The disk will be unavailable until Chkdsk completes. Chkdsk output will be logged to file 'C:WindowsClusterReportsChkDsk_ResCluster Disk 25_Disk16Part1.log'. Chkdsk may also write information to the Application Event Log.

7.) Event ID : 1066
Cluster disk resource 'Cluster Disk 26' indicates corruption for volume '?Volume{88552e05-aea2-11df-9790-0026b92fffa7}'. Chkdsk is being run to repair problems. The disk will be unavailable until Chkdsk completes. Chkdsk
output will be logged to file 'C:WindowsClusterReportsChkDsk_ResCluster Disk 26_Disk4Part1.log'. Chkdsk may also write information to the Application Event Log.

8.) Event ID: 1049
  (Same message as point 2)

9.) Event ID: 1069
     (Same message as point 3)

10.) Event ID : 1049
(same message as point 4)

11.) Event ID :1069 
(same message as point 5)

12.) Event ID :1205
The Cluster service failed to bring clustered service or application 'Cluster Group' completely online or offline. One or more resources may be in a failed state. This may impact the availability of the clustered service or application.

13.) Event ID: 1069
Cluster resource 'Cluster Disk 17' in clustered service or application 'SQL Server (MSSQLSERVER)' failed.

14.) Event D : 1049
(same message as point 2)

15.) Event ID: 1069
Cluster resource 'SQL IP Address 1 (XYZ)' in clustered service or application 'SQL Server (MSSQLSERVER)' failed.

16.) Event ID : 1205
 The Cluster service failed to bring clustered service or application 'SQL Server (MSSQLSERVER)' completely online or offline. One or more resources may be in a failed state. This may impact the availability of the clustered service or application.
 
first of all,I went through all the logs, and could not find the reason for fail-over initialization. There should be some thing logged why the failover happened? secondly after failover the service was not coming online due to duplicate IP address detection.

Later when we try  to manually bring the service online from cluster management it comes online successfully. I don't understand how would duplicate IP address get resolved when we start manually.

Lastly we see few errors related to physical disk resource between failover retries, is this could be the correlated to failover error ?

View 4 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved