I tested the failover clustering for SQL 2008R2.When I stop the SQL server services manully, the failover did not fail to another resource. At the Faiolover cluster manager, SQl server(MSSQLSERVER) only show the status for offline. I think it should be move to another owner intead of just show as offline.
View 3 Replies1. In alwaysON fail over cluster, Once fail over to secondary replica, what will happen to connected session in primary node? can the session fail over to secondary seamlessly or need to re-login. what happen committed transactions which has not write to disk.
2. Assume I have always on cluster with three nodes, if primary fails, how second node make write/ read mode.
3. After fail over done to 2nd secondary node what mode in production(readonly or read write).
4. How to rollback to production primary ,will change data in secondary will get updated in primary.
We have a requirement to build SQL environment which will give us local high availability and disaster recovery to second site. We have two sites- Site A & Site B. We are planning to have two nodes at Site A and 2 nodes at Site B. All four nodes will be part of same Windows failover cluster. We will build two SQL Cluster, InstanceA will be clustered between the nodes at Site A Server and InstanceB will be clustered between the nodes at Site B, we will enable Always On Between the InstanceA and InstanceB and will be primary owner where data will be written on InstanceA and will be replicated to InstaceB. URL....Now we want we will have instanceC on the Site B and data will be writen from the application available on Site B, will be replicated to the instance on the Site A as replica.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have a 2 node Microsoft 2000 cluster with a shared storage device. Iwant to create automatic failover for MS SQL 2000 server. I can dothat wit the following options:1. Active/Pasive (one instance installed)2. Active/Active (More then one instance/virtual sql serversinstalled)I have a question about option 2.Is it possible to have more then one instance/virtual SQL server,service only one database for example loadbalancing. ?, or when youcreate multiple instances/virtual SQL servers, does that mean you havemultiple databases ? If not why does a Virtual SQL server has to betaken over by a cluster node that didnt fail. Then you can actuallyuse option 1. Please advise!The documentation is not very clear on this issues.Regards,Nico de Groot
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi all,
We are the studying the possibilty of implementing SQL - Clustering for
Failover server.
Are there any third party tools readily available.
Any suggestion or checklist ??
Any suggestions or comments will be appreciated.
Thanks and have a great day.
Dear Friends,I wanted to configure Failover cluster for SQL Server 2000 on Windows2000 advanced servers.I have only 2 no.s of windows 2000 advanced server m/cs. I dont haveany shared disks and SCSI drives. Can I still configure the Failoverclustering?I would like to know more about the need for the shared disks in theFailover clustering.Please shed some light.RegardsKumar
View 1 Replies View RelatedDoes anyone know how to obtain the physical server name that a SQL failover cluster instance is running on through the system tables or other database commands? Thanks in advance.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have two SQL 7.0 SP1 (WinNT 4.0 SP 6.2) Servers using Clustering.
Problem: When SQLBox1 goes down, the Failover sends it to SQLBox2. When
SQLBox1 comes back up, the node stays on SQLBox2, instead of going back to
SQLBox1. This happens over 50% of the time, but not every time. Sometimes
it works fine.
I have done 3 hours of research, and can not find anything on this problem,
can any one a tleast point me in the right direction. I can hardly find any
troubleshooting on this issue. I do have January 2000 of the MSDN Library
installed on my machine if that helps, but there was not much on it in there
either (at least not that I found).
:confused:
In evaluating/comparing MS Clustering vs Hardware Failover Blades, has anyone come across any disadvantages/concerns for a Hardware Failover Blades.
Why would you install MS SQL 2000 Clustering when you can use a Hardware Failover Blade and use a SQL 2000 standard edition. e.g In an event a hardware failure occurs the admin manager brings over a standby hardware blade and reassigns it to the SAN (on which OS and SQL 2000) is installed and you are up and running.
Would appreciate any comments and suggestions to compare these solutions.
Thanks
how to configure email in SQL server failover clustering. I need to configure email to send when node switches from one node to another. best way to configure email in fail over clustering?
View 1 Replies View Related
I have 2 Windows 2003 r2 servers with a SQL failover cluster installed across the 2 node. Generally I have been running off node1 with node2 as the failover partner. I have purchased the correct licensing for noe1 and from the following I do not need to purchase a license for node2:
Failover clustering is a process where the operating system and SQL Server 2005 work together to provide availability in the event of an application failure, hardware failure, or operating-system error. Failover clustering provides hardware redundancy through a configuration in which critical resources are transferred automatically from a failing machine to an equally configured server to help ensure continuity of service.
When doing failover support, a server is designated as the passive server. The purpose of the passive server is to absorb the data and information held in another server that fails. A passive server does not need a license if the number of processors in the passive server is equal to or less than the number of processors in the active server. The passive server can take the duties of the active server for 30 days. Afterwards, it must be licensed accordingly
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/howtobuy/activepassive.mspx
My questions are:
1) If I switch my cluster instace to point to node2 for testing node2 in case of a failover, would I need to purchase another licence ? This means I am not doing the repointing because of an 'event of an application failure, hardware failure, or operating-system error' ? Can you please provide information from MS ?
2) How are SQL Licences bound to the windows install in a SQL Server failover cluster configuration ? For instance if node1 legitimately fails due to an 'event of an application failure, hardware failure, or operating-system error' and you failover to node2. Then you think, stuff (forget about) node1 as I have 1 set of licences for SQL Enterprise already and therefore can run with a legitimate licence on node2. Can you please clarify ?
3) I have heard that only one server needs a license in a failover cluster. Then how does this fit in with any of the questions from above:
'The passive server can take the duties of the active server for 30 days. Afterwards, it must be licensed accordingly' ?
In the event of a legitimate failure, node2 would be running off the license purchased. So why are MS restricting the use of it for 30 days ?
I am looking in to using Microsoft Clustering supported in NT Server Enterprise to provide failover support for 2 database servers running SQL Server 7. I was wondering if anyone had any experience with it--good or bad. I read the white paper and it sounds good, but I'd like to get some real
world application experience.
Thanks for any info.
Bob
Could I implement a failover cluster solution on the two DBs which are based in two different cities?
Possible?
Hi All,
We're planning to install a Server 2005 Failover Cluster and I'd like to find more information about licensing, etc.
Basic questions:
- What is the best O.S. to run? Win 2003 or the new 2008? And what version (datacenter, enterprise)?
- Since I'm going to use 2 machines, will I have to pay for 2 licenses (sql and windows - two lic. each)? Or just 1 license, since just 1 machine will be the active server?
This is for some web applications, so, web environment.
Any help?
Thank you!
Hello.
I am confuse and cant decide on how to setup high availability on our SQL 2005. Here's what on my mind and on resources list:
I plan to have mirroring on my SQL1 to SQL2 with the help of SQL3 as witness. So this would be automatic failover. My idea on mirroring is when SQL1 goes down, SQL3 would tell SQL2 to run and be the primary. It will automatically failover to SQL2. Right? My questions are:
1) How can I revert back to SQL1 once it is ready?
2) I read in one of the post that it is impossible to write in a mirrored DB, is this true? I mean, what's the use of failing over to the next node when it's not possible to write and update data/records?
3) If number 2 is false (i hope so), how would the data be synchronize from SQL2 back to SQL1. Those transaction that were made while SQL1 is down.
4) How about the connection string from the web applications? Would it be automatically point to SQL2? We have load balancing setup in place, would this help web application connection to automatically point to SQL2?
Another setup:
We have SAN in place (not yet used, but is planning to use for this SQL thing), EMC to be specific. My question would be:
1) For SAN setup, the data storage would be centralize. So would that mean that SQL1 and SQL2 services will use the same data and log file from the SAN storage?
2) How would you call this setup then? Can this be clustering type of high availability? Will clustering work under load balancing setup? I believe mirroring is not possible here? Right?
3) How can I setup my 3 SQL servers with the same theory in mind: when SQL1 goes down, SQL2 will take over. Data will be synchronize when SQL1 is up and running again. With automatic failover and reverting back to primary.
I read so much topics about this, but the more I research, the more I get confuse.
Any suggestions, comments, advice is greatly appreciated!
We want to use sql 2005 failover clustering feature, so that upgrade sql 2000 is necessary. But some of the stored procedures built in 2000 are not working directly in 2005, set the compatibility level to 80 could make them work. In this case, can somebody here tell me if down grade the database level will affect failover clustering running properly? e.g. will data still be synchronized properly? Thanks in advance.
View 3 Replies View RelatedCould not able to connect secondary replica below is the error message I am getting when I tried to failover. Cannot connect to VLDBATEAM.
The secondary replica that you selected to become the new primary replica does not belong to the specified availability group. A possible explanation is that the replica has not been joined the availability group. (Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.HadrTasks)
I am setting up my first sql node on a 2 node cluster and runing into this
The disks are already added into the failover cluster manager
I am need of comparing ORACLE and SQL clustering,.
1) Dynamic addition / removal of nodes with no effects on data distribution-- I think Yes
2) Integrated clustering technology for all major OS and Server Platforms
3) Automatic Workload management that enables enterprise Grids
4) Recovery Advisories
I'd like to understand why it is not possible to automatic Failover Availability Groups using Failover Cluster Instances. I think it would be great for DR and HA. Do you understand why that limitation exists?
The link [URL] ....
SQL Server Failover Cluster Instances (FCIs) do not support automatic failover by availability groups, so any availability replica that is hosted by an FCI can only be configured for manual failover.
I have setup a WSFC that contains 3 nodes ( node 1,2 belongs to subnet A and node3 to subnet B), lets say node 1 is the primary host in the wsfc.
Each node has their own sql server instance, that i configure an Availability Group that will replicate between node1 and node 3), created an Availability Group Listener that will contain 2 vips for each subnet.
My question here and I am not sure if i missed something when setting up the Availability Group. If i failover an Availability group from sql server from node 1 subnet a to nde 3 subnet b, then the listener will be on the vip that belongs to subnet b and the primary instance will be the one in node 3, but this wont cause the WSFC to move the primary host from node 1 to node 3.
So at this point dont see what is the dependency between setting up the AG with WSFC. when fail over an AG doesn't cause the primary host in wsfc to fail over as well.
Why availability group relies on WSFC and how can i make it to depend so the primary host moves as well?
I am using SQL 2012 SE with clustering on Windows server 2008 R2. Now I want migrate it to windows server 2012 with minimal down time. So I want to evict the passive node and add a new node with windows server 2012 and install sql server 2012 SE on the new passive node and perform a failover(make the node with 2012 OS as active) and then evict the new passive node and add another node with windows 2012 and then do the same thing?
View 12 Replies View RelatedWe are trying to build HA and DR environment, combining AG and FCI. So we have 3 servers added to a cluster, 2 of them sharing the same storage and working as ACTIVE-PASSIVE cluster instance. The other server has a stand alone instance with its local storage, with the same drivers letters as the cluster instance.
Between the Active FCI and the Stand Alone, we set up an Availability Group. They are running fine, except by the listener. When the stand alone instance owns the Primary Replica, I am able to access the SQL Server instance by the listener, but when the Primary Replica is owned by the FCI, I can't reach the database by the listener (name or IP).
I've opened the same ports in both servers, it hasn't worked though.
I have a windows 2012 cluster environment that consists of two SQL servers nodes with Quorum disk configured as witness.
Manual failover between nodes is working fine, however the sql instance virtual is not seeing the Quorum disk.
Moreover the Quorum disk has the same number as another cluster storage disk, is that considered a problem?
When I move the SQL instance from a node to anohter, should the Quorum Disk change ownership as well to that destination node ? if it is not changing ownership what would be the problem??
I'm getting the following error when I go to create a cluster in the Failover Cluster Manager in Windows Server 2008.
"The address 10.10.10.111 is not valid for its associated network"
I'm following the instruction in the book for the 70-462 exam. There was a step that had me create a DNS A record for the address sql-cluster.contoso.com. The IP address was mapped to 10.10.10.111. I'm not sure if this is the culprit but its the only time I used that IP address in the setup.
Below are 2 screenshots. The first screenshot is the error. The second screenshot is my DNS console.
I saw following point on Technet article about RBS.The local FILESTREAM provider is supported only when it is used on local hard disk drives or an attached Internet Small Computer System Interface (iSCSI) device. You cannot use the local RBS FILESTREAM provider on remote storage devices such as network attached storage (NAS).It looks like that we cannot use FILESTREAM on Failover Cluster because to setup Failover Cluster we need to have NAS. But then the NAS is made available locally for Failover Cluster so FILESTREAM should work right?Found another article which talks about setting up FILESTREAM on Failover Cluster. URL...
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have availability group with 3 node
2 in prod env and other one in DR
all replica configure with Asynchronous status
I would like to test fail-over first scenario prod env i would like to trying shutdown primary server and move to replica in prod.
I should move to replica prod from cluster service management or from SQL management studio
if i do it from cluster manager do you have power shell script for that
if i do it from SQL management studio i need the command
After manual AG fail-over from primary to secondary the application is not able to connect the listener name for atleast for 5 - 10 mins
The telnet fails during this time from app server, the listener ip is on muti-subnet.
At the same when i try to connect it from SSMS from a remote machine it works fine.
The main objective is to have a third party program operate on a failover cluster. The OS is Windows Server 2012 Datacenter loaded on 2 nodes. A virtual node exists along with supporting disks. This client software uses a SQL Server database. SQL Server 2012 Enterprise is installed and operating in a failover environment. However the client software is not failing over. If the connection to node A is lost, SQL Server fails over to node B. But the client application does not.
What needs to occur in order to associate the client software with the failover cluster? This software has 6 services total installed. Some are referred to as servers - looks like to communicate between remote client computers and the database. What is the process to associate the client software with the failover?
we have to build high availability SQL 2012 cluster for VDI and we have two options. One option is to build a server cluster with combination of failover and mirroring and other option is to build failover cluster with AlwaysOn.We are not sure which option to chose. We have contacted Microsoft support to provide us some documents and instructions for failovermirroring combination but they have send us instructions for AlwaysOn option.
What would be best way to build high availability cluster for VDI? Also, since first option is very complicated.
I am not able to connect listener after manual failover.
(This is test environment)
Server1,Server3 -> Both synchronous (Within Same data center)
Server 3 -> Async (At DR location) -Forced Failover
Test1:
Failover Server1 to Server2 --> Able to connect Listener
Failover Server2 to Server1--> Able to connect Listener.
Failover Server1 to Server3--> Able to connect Listener.
Failover Server3 to Server1 or 2 --> Unable to connect Listener. Unable to ping Listener.
Failover Server 1or2 to Server3--> Able to connect Listener.
I am using below sub-nets:
10.11.192.0/22 10.11.192.130
10.12.192.0/22 10.12.192.140
I want to install service pack 3 to my SQL Server 2012 Enterprise running on windows server 2008 R2 Enterprise fail over cluster, I read about the SP installation in technet, its mentioned that the passive node should be patched first and to do this the passive node should be removed from the cluster, I need to know whether I should completely remove the node from windows cluster or remove the node by using SQL Server installer and install the service pack and then add it back to the cluster, Can I do this by pausing the node in cluster and perform the service pack installation ?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm getting an error adding Replica to SQL AlwaysOn failover cluster in the new availability group wizard. When I enter the name of the target node (secondary replica) server and press connect, I get the following:
A network-related or instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to SQL Server.
The server was not found or was not accessible. Verify that the instance name is correct and that SQL Server is configured to allow remote connections. (provider: Named Pipes Provider, error: 40 - Could not open a connection to SQL Server) (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 2) The system cannot fine the file specified
The SQL Browser service is up and running on the target. I am using an Azure VM for my SQL instance. This cluster spans geographies from our on-premise site to Azure via a VPN. This is a multi-subnet cluster. I'm attempting to create a new AG from the primary replica node and the target is a node on Azure called SSASNodeAz03.
[URL]
Full error:
Connect to Server
Cannot connect to ssasnodeaz03
Additional information: A network-related or instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to SQL Server.
The server was not found or was not accessible. Verify that the instance name is correct and that SQL Server is configured to allow remote connections. (provider: Named Pipes Provider, error: 40 - Could not open a connection to SQL Server) (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 2) The system cannot fine the file specified