Recovery :: Instance Still Accessible If Transaction Log Reached Maximum Size?

Oct 12, 2015

One of our production databases was setup mirroring, log shipping and replication on it, the log file was setup unrestricted growth. This morning one index rebuilding process generated lots of logs, and the log file disk ran out of space, the database was in recovery mode. so we had to disable log shipping, pause mirroring and replication, expand log file disk, restarted SQL instance to fix the issue. Now we want to setup the log file to maximum size 80G, the whole log file disk is 120G.

So if the log file reached 80G next time, we can change the max size to 90G or 100G and it's easier to fix the space issue. My question is, if the database  log file reached max size,

1. is the database still available? 
2. Will the active session causing the issue be rollback to release space back?

View 5 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Recovery Model And Transaction Log Size

Dec 23, 2007

Hi,
What is the relationship between recovery model and transaction log? How does recovery model affect txn log file size?
How to decide which model should I use?

Thank you

View 3 Replies View Related

Maximum Limit For Connections Has Been Reached

Mar 23, 2001

We have been running SQL Server 7 for the past 6 months, with no problems at all. All of a sudden, we have received the error message 17050, that the maximum limit for connections has been reached. We cannot now start Enterprise Manager or do anything. We have tried fiddling with licencing in control panel but to no avail. Does anyone have any idea why this has suddenly happened? Any tips would be great!

Cheers.

View 2 Replies View Related

Maximum Number Of Processes Reached

May 28, 2007

I am trying to setup transactional replication between Server A and Server B. There are 265 databases on each server.


I am running SQL Server 2005 on Windows Server 2003. The problem comes in at the 201st database. The message in the SQL Server Agent Error Log is :

Warning,[398] The job (WSSWPG09-EmpirePaint-WSSWPG06-104) has been queued because the maximum number of working threads (400) are already running. This job will be executed as soon as one of the working thread finishes execution.

SQL Server's max worker threads is set to 0. The Distribution, LogReader and T-SQL subsystems have been increased to 200 max_worker_threads.

Is there some other setting (maybe a Windows Registry setting) that can be configured to fix this? Or have I just hit a physical maximum of the processor?

Any help is much appreciated.

View 3 Replies View Related

Error 500, Maximum Concurrent Users Have Reached

Jul 20, 2005

We are running three web sites in a clustered environmentWLBS. The web servers are connected to a Database Serverrunning MS SQL server enterprise edition licensed as perCPU license. The Windows 2000 Advanced Server Licensingmode on all the servers is per SEAT license.Our customers are accessing our web servers and after sometime getting error 500, Maximum concurrent users havereached.We have been told by our software provider that theconnection problem lies with the ADO components whichcommunicating with the SQL server.We have been turning round and round, without any luck.Your help will be highly appreciated.Thanks and best regardsDaveLearning is a Never Ending process*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2008 :: Maximum Number Of Sessions Has Been Reached

Jun 29, 2015

We have a big software that run a warehouse distribution center, written in .NET Backhand is a SQL Server 2008 R2 STD database.

Now, it seems there is a problem with the sessions not being properly closed after each call to the DB. Here is the message got form SQL:

DESCRIPTION:A new connection was rejected because the maximum number of connections on session ID 57 has been reached. Close an existing connection on this session and retry.

In the .NET code, connection is made with the following code:

If oConn Is Nothing Then oConn = New SqlConnection
If oConn.State = ConnectionState.Open Then oConn.Close()
With oConn
.ConnectionString = "Server=" & Server & ";Database=" & DB & ";User ID=" & User & ";Password=" & Pass & ";Connection Timeout=" & 5 & ";MultipleActiveResultSets=" & True
.Open()
End With

This code is called once, at the opening of the software

StoredProc are call with the code:
Try
oCmd = New SqlCommand
With oCmd
.Connection = oConn
.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure

[Code] .....

So every Command is closed after execution, yet, they stay active in the SQL Server. Is there something I'm missing here?

View 3 Replies View Related

Sql Server Causes No Buffer Space Available (maximum Connections Reached?): Recv Failed

Jul 23, 2005

I'll try and keep this brief so in a nutshell:I have large distributed java system running on a Windows 2003 server(4cpu 8Gb memory).Periodically the following exceptions occurs in the servers:java.net.SocketException: No buffer space available (maximumconnections reached?): recv failedI know for a fact we are not using too many TCPIP sockets or runningtoo many socket servers.I have googled this error and found very little to help me.What buffer space is this?What does recv failed mean?(Is it at all relevant that sql server is running on the same box?)Any advice appreciated.Thanks in advance.Dan

View 5 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Error - Maximum Row Size Exceeds Allowed Maximum Of 8060 Bytes

Sep 12, 2015

I have some code I build 2 weeks ago which I’ve been running daily but it’s suddenly stopped working with the following error.

“The table "tbl_Intraday_Tmp" has been created, but its maximum row size exceeds the allowed maximum of 8060 bytes. INSERT or UPDATE to this table will fail if the resulting row exceeds the size limit” When I google this there seems to be a related to tables with vast numbers of columns.

My table tbl_Intraday_tmp is relatively small. It has 7 columns. 1 of varchar(5), 3 of decimal(9,3) and 2 of decimal(18,0). The bit I’m puzzled with is it was working and stopped.

I don’t recall changing anything but I wouldn’t rule that out. I ‘ve inspected the source files and I don’t believe they have changed either.

DECLARE              
@FileName varchar(50),
@Path varchar(50),
@SqlCmd varchar(1000)
= '',
@ASXCode varchar(5),
@Offset decimal(18,0),

[code]....

View 5 Replies View Related

Error - Maximum Row Size Exceed Allowed Maximum Of 8060 Bytes

Apr 20, 2012

I am using MS SQL server 2008, and i have a table with 350 columns and when i m trying to create one more column its giving error with below message -

Warning: The table XXX has been created, but its maximum row size exceeds the allowed maximum of 8060 bytes.

INSERT or UPDATE to this table will fail if the resulting row exceeds the size limit.

how can i resolve this?

View 14 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Active Second Replica Shared DB Not Accessible

Apr 27, 2015

I have Active Active Cluster with 2 nodes , on the first node I can execute the queries, but when I trying to execute query or just open a DB to see the tables I getting error:"The Database XX is not accessible. (ObjectExplorer)".

View 5 Replies View Related

What Happens When The 4 GB Database Size Limit Is Reached?

Jan 11, 2007

Does the user get an error message?

What error does an application get that tries to insert additional data via ODBC?

View 10 Replies View Related

Timeout Expired...mas Pool Size Was Reached. I've Tried Everything.

Sep 26, 2007

I am working on a large application built on the 1.1 framework in VS2003 (SQL Server 2000 DB) and keep getting this error:
'Timeout expired.  The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool.  This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached'. 
I can run the app in Debug 10 consecutive times, doing the exact same thing every time, and the error will occur at 10 different points, and 10 different calls to the data-access layer.
There is a data-access layer that is responsible for executing sql statements and stored procs.  Every function in the data-access layer handles connections in the following way:
Try  ' setup data adapter   da.Fill(ds, "ResultSet")   Return dsCatch ex As Exception   ' send the exception back to the client    Throw exFinally   ' release objects   da.Dispose()   conn.Close() : conn.Dispose()End Try
 I have read numerous posts about making sure not to leak connections.  I have watched the connections within the SQL Activity Monitor and, at the most, there are 5 connections open at any given time.  I use the default timeout and pool size values (30 sec. and 100 connections) in my connection strings.  I am 99% positive that I am not leaking connections.  Are there any other explanations for why this is happening? 

View 4 Replies View Related

Named Sql Instance Not Accessible Remotly

Apr 10, 2008

Hi All,

We have two Baan erp servers 1) SQL2005 on windows 2003 server 2) SQL2000 on windows 200 server.

SQL 2005 server has two database instances, one being the default and the other one as a named instance.

We have been trying to access the data in these two database instances from the second server for our baan erp application on it. Now, we are able to see the data for default instance, but if we try to fetch the data from named instance we end up getting dberror 17.

We tried to register the named instance on the second server using "new sql server registration wizard" in sql 2000 enterprise manager, but there also the list only shows the default instance from sql 2005 server. I tried to type in the named instance and register (both windows and sql server authentication), but end up getting error "Database instance doesn't exist or access denied".

So, for some reason, the named instance from sql 2005 server is not getting published on the network. Please suggest some ways to get around this issue.

thanks,

Jatin

View 1 Replies View Related

Transact SQL :: Change Db In Recovery To No-recovery And Restore Transaction Log?

May 5, 2015

in the process of migrating a big db from server 1 to server 2, we had to roll back the change. I started with taking a full db backup and restoring it on server 2 with norecovery, and then a couple logs with norecovery, and then the last log with recovery.

Is there some way to continue this chain now, I mean to change the db to norecovery, or other way to restore logs. 

I dont want to do a new full backup.

If I try to do a log restore now i get the message:

Msg 3117, Level 16, State 4, Line 1

The log or differential backup cannot be restored because no files are ready to rollforward.

Msg 3013, Level 16, State 1, Line 1

RESTORE LOG is terminating abnormally.

View 6 Replies View Related

Recovery :: How Many Maximum Database Can Have In AlwaysON AG

Oct 29, 2014

How many maximum database's can we have in AlwaysON Availability Group?

View 3 Replies View Related

Recovery :: Maximum Number Of Databases That Are Supported In AlwaysOn?

May 13, 2015

I believe to configure maximum number of replicas it is required to have 5 nodes (1 Primary & 4 Secondary replicas). But how many databases can be included in one availability group, it think it is 32767. When I am referring to below URL it is mentioned something like "An availability group supports a set of read-write primary databases and one to eight sets of corresponding secondary databases. " What does this 'sets' means, is that maximum limit for only eight databases or maximum groups should be eight?

[URL] ....

View 3 Replies View Related

Maximum Possible Database Size

Sep 20, 2007

I posted this in another area and didn't get an answer, so maybe I posted it in the wrong place. Forgive me if you've seen this twice.


I'm trying to figure out what the ultimate size limitation for a SQL 2005 Enterprise server is. This document is helpful but I'm a bit confused:

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143432.aspx

In the document, it says that the maximum database size is 524,258 terabytes; however, it also says that the maximum data file size--which I assume is the .MDF file--is 16 terabytes. My question is, how can you create a 524,258 TB database if the maximum file size 16 TB?

Dumb question, I'm sure...please enlighten me!

Norm

View 1 Replies View Related

Maximum Size Of OPENXML IN SP

May 17, 2006



How much data we can pass through as an XML Text into SP by the concept OPENXML

View 1 Replies View Related

Maximum Datafile/log File Size

Dec 8, 2004

Is there any limit to the maximum size of a datafile or transaction log you can have with SQL Server 2000 on Windows 2000. Also is there a maximum size that should be adhered to for performance and admin reasons ?.

View 4 Replies View Related

Maximum Insert Commit Size

Oct 11, 2006



Hi, All,



if I set the "Maximum insert commit size" to 10 ( 0 is the default) in a OLE destination,

what does the 10 means? 10 records or 10 MB/KB of data?


Thanks

View 4 Replies View Related

What Is Maximum Database Size In The SSCE?

Apr 24, 2007

Hi,



I've found a two different answers for this question:

one - on the http://support.microsoft.com/Default.aspx?kbid=920700 site where on the Performance improvements section there is a 128MB value in the Database size.

other is in the product datasheet there is a information that this version supports databases up to 4 GB.



Could you tell me what is the correct answer?



Regards,

Mariouche

View 3 Replies View Related

Maximum SQL 2005 Database Size

Sep 19, 2007



Hello! I'm trying to figure out what the ultimate size limitation for a SQL 2005 Enterprise server is. This document is helpful but I'm a bit confused:

http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143432.aspx

In the document, it says that the maximum database size is 524,258 terabytes; however, it also says that the maximum data file size--which I assume is the .MDF file--is 16 terabytes. My question is, how can you create a 524,258 TB database if the maximum file size 16 TB?

Dumb question, I'm sure...please enlighten me!

Norm

View 5 Replies View Related

Replication Maximum Buffer Size

Oct 19, 2007

Hi,

I'd like to replicate an SQL Server Database to an SDF file. For Simplicity I want to use the SQL Server 2005 Management Console. The Console reports that the maximum buffer size were to small. In the comment (c# code) I can see it is set to 512. How can I increase the value in the replication assistant?

Miroslaw

View 3 Replies View Related

Cannot Set Maximum Database Size By DBPROP_SSCE_MAX_DATABASE_SIZE;

Sep 27, 2007

I try to limit the database size to 2MB by the following code, but it doesn't work, Could somebody help me on it?
Thanks a lot!

Part of my code is:

VariantInit(&dbprop[0].vValue);

VariantInit(&dbprop[1].vValue);

VariantInit(&dbprop[2].vValue);

VariantInit(&dbprop[3].vValue);

// Create an instance of the OLE DB Provider

//

hr = CoCreateInstance( CLSID_SQLSERVERCE_3_0,

0,

CLSCTX_INPROC_SERVER,

IID_IDBInitialize,

(void**)&pIDBInitialize);

if(FAILED(hr))

{

goto Exit;

}

// Initialize a property with name of database

//

dbprop[0].dwPropertyID = DBPROP_INIT_DATASOURCE;

dbprop[0].dwOptions = DBPROPOPTIONS_REQUIRED;

dbprop[0].vValue.vt = VT_BSTR;

dbprop[0].vValue.bstrVal = SysAllocString( DATABASE_LOG );

if(NULL == dbprop[0].vValue.bstrVal)

{

hr = E_OUTOFMEMORY;

goto Exit;

}

// Initialize property with open mode for database

dbprop[1].dwPropertyID = DBPROP_INIT_MODE;

dbprop[1].dwOptions = DBPROPOPTIONS_REQUIRED;

dbprop[1].vValue.vt = VT_I4;

dbprop[1].vValue.lVal = DB_MODE_READ | DB_MODE_WRITE;

// Set max database size

dbprop[2].dwPropertyID = DBPROP_SSCE_MAX_DATABASE_SIZE;

dbprop[2].dwOptions = DBPROPOPTIONS_REQUIRED;

dbprop[2].vValue.vt = VT_I4;

dbprop[2].vValue.lVal = 2; // 2MB

// set max size of temp. database file to 2MB

dbprop[3].dwPropertyID = DBPROP_SSCE_TEMPFILE_MAX_SIZE;

dbprop[3].dwOptions = DBPROPOPTIONS_REQUIRED;

dbprop[3].vValue.vt = VT_I4;

dbprop[3].vValue.lVal = 2; // 2MB

// Initialize the property set

//

dbpropset[0].guidPropertySet = DBPROPSET_DBINIT;

dbpropset[0].rgProperties = dbprop;

dbpropset[0].cProperties = sizeof(dbprop)/sizeof(dbprop[0]);

// Get IDBDataSourceAdmin interface

//

hr = pIDBInitialize->QueryInterface(IID_IDBDataSourceAdmin, (void **) &pIDBDataSourceAdmin);

if(FAILED(hr))

{

goto Exit;

}

// Create and initialize data store

//

hr = pIDBDataSourceAdmin->CreateDataSource( 1, dbpropset, NULL, IID_IUnknown, &pIUnknownSession);

if(FAILED(hr))

{

goto Exit;

}

View 6 Replies View Related

Timeout Expired. The Timeout Period Elapsed Prior To Obtaining A Connection From The Pool. This May Have Occurred Because All Pooled Connections Were In Use And Max Pool Size Was Reached.

Feb 11, 2004

What does this error message imply?

View 3 Replies View Related

Does The IDENTITY Field Type In SQL Have A Maximum Size To It?

Mar 11, 2007

Does the IDENTITY field type in SQL have a maximum size to it?
 
You know like int only goes so high up,

View 1 Replies View Related

Maximum Size For Ntext Type In Sql Server

Mar 29, 2006

I couldn't insert more than 4000 charachters in "ntext" type in SQL server. Is there anyway, i can increase the size or any suggestions?

View 7 Replies View Related

Row Is Bigger Than Maximum Size (1962 Bytes)

Mar 11, 2000

Microsoft OLE DB Provider for ODBC Drivers error ' 80040e14'

[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Updated or inserted row is bigger than maximum size (1962 bytes) allowed for this table.

database:microsoft 6.5 SQL

How can I solve this problem
thanks,shay

View 1 Replies View Related

Maximum Size Of The SSIS String Variable?

Aug 30, 2007

In SSIS, what is the maximum size of the String variable (one that you would define in the Variables dialog box)?

View 13 Replies View Related

OLE DB Destination - Fast Load With Maximum Insert Commit Size

Sep 8, 2006

I'm seeing some strange behavior from the OLE DB Destination when using the "fast load" access mode and setting the "Maximum insert commit size".

When I do not set the "Rows per batch" or the "Maximum insert commit size", the package I'm working with inserts 123,070 rows using a single "insert bulk" statement. The data seems to flow through the pipeline until it gets to the OLE DB Destination and then I see a short pause. I'm assuming the pause is from the "insert bulk" statement handling all of the rows at once.

When I set the "Rows per batch" option but leave the "Maximum insert commit size" alone, I generally see the same behavior -- a single "insert bulk" statement that handles all 123,070. In this case, however, the "insert bulk" statement has a "ROWS_PER_BATCH" option appended to the statement that matches the "Rows per batch" setting. This makes sense. I'm assuming the "insert bulk" then "batches" the rows into multiple insert statements (although I'm unsure of how to confirm this). This version of the "insert bulk" statement appears to run in about the same time as the case above.

When I set the "Maximum insert commit size" option and leave the "Rows per batch" statement alone, I see multiple "insert bulk" statements being executed, each handling the lower of either the value I specify for the "Maximum insert commit size" or the number of rows in a single buffer flowing through the pipeline. In my testing, the number of rows in a buffer was 9,681. So, if I set the "Maximum insert commit size" to 5,000, I see two "insert bulk" statements for each buffer that flows into the OLE DB Destination (one handling 5,000 rows and one handling 4,681 rows). If I set the "Maximum insert commit size" to 10,000, I see a single "insert bulk" statement for each buffer that flows into the OLE DB Destination (handling 9,681 rows).

Now the problem. When I set the "Maximum insert commit size" as described in the last case above, I see LONG pauses between buffers being handled by the OLE DB Destination. For example, I might see one buffer of data flow through (and be handled by one or more "insert bulk" statements based on the "Maximum insert commit size" setting), then see a 2-3 minute pause before the next buffer of data is handled (with its one or more "insert bulk" statements being executed). Then I might see a 4-5 minute pause before the next buffer of data is handled. The pause between the buffers being passed through the OLE DB Destination (and handled via the "insert bulk" statements) is sometimes shorter, sometimes longer.

Using Profiler, I don't see any other activity going on within the database or within SQL Server itself that would explain the pauses between the buffers being handled by the OLE DB Destination and the resulting "insert bulk" statements...

Can anyone explain what is going on here? Is setting the "Maximum insert commit size" a bad idea? What are the differences between it and the "Rows per batch" setting and what are the recommended uses of these two options to try to improve the performance of the insert (particularly when handling millions of rows)?

TIA for any thoughts or information...

Dave Fackler

View 8 Replies View Related

Maximum Number Of Updates Within A Transaction

Aug 21, 2006

Good day to all

SQL Server 2000.

I have a problem with a piece of code, which updates some tables using transaction. This process brings the program to a halt when updating large files.

With smaller files, the process finishes without problems.

I have noticed that, if a comment out the "begin transaction" and respective "commit", the same code executes without problems, even when updating large files.

I suspect that there is a limit on the number of records a transaction can hold before a commit is issued. I am surprised however, that SQL Server halts, without messages or warnings.

Is this a configuration issue? If there is a limit on the number of records a transaction can hold, what is this limit:? Anything I can do to have a warning form SQL Server when a situation like this is reached (or indeed to avoid this situation) ?

Thank you in advance for any help

Cecil Ricardo

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL Server Admin 2014 :: Maximum Size Of DB Hosted On Cloud Environment?

Feb 28, 2015

what is the maximum size of a DB hosted on SQL 2012 cloud environment?

View 3 Replies View Related

Warning: The Table 'PropertyInstancesAudits' Has Been Created But Its Maximum Row Size (8190) Exceeds

Apr 17, 2008

Hi All

I am running a script which has a table creation. The table gets created, but with the below warning.


Warning: The table 'PropertyInstancesAudits' has been created but its maximum row size (8190) exceeds the maximum number of bytes per row (8060). INSERT or UPDATE of a row in this table will fail if the resulting row length exceeds 8060 bytes.

Structure is as under:




Code SnippetCREATE TABLE [dbo].[PropertyInstancesAudits] (
[PIA_ClassID] [uniqueidentifier] NOT NULL ,
[PIA_ClassPropertyID] [uniqueidentifier] NOT NULL ,
[PIA_InstanceID] [uniqueidentifier] NOT NULL ,
[PIA_Value] [sql_variant] NOT NULL ,
[PIA_StartModID] [bigint] NOT NULL ,
[PIA_EndModID] [bigint] NOT NULL ,
[PIA_SuserSid] [varbinary] (85) NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO




How should I get rid of this?

View 4 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved