Redundant SQL Server
Feb 2, 2005
Hi, good day everyone.
I would like to have a question here,
I want to configure a redundant SQL server. Let's said if server A is down, then server B can take over the workload of server A, and this is transparent to users which means they won't notify server A is down.
Besides the failover clustering method, is there any other solution?
My requirement is needed to run in Microsoft SQL 2000 standard edition and Microsoft Windows 2000 standard edition
Thanks,
View 6 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Aug 26, 2004
The next script, gets redundant indexes, in a given database.
I run it in the query Analyzer, one statement at a time.
PLEASE: review the output, before drop any index.
USE ....
-- step 1
-- gets an tab,idx,col,order view
create view listaidxcols as
select SO.name as tabname,
SI.name as idxname,
IK.keyno as keyno,
SC.name as colname
from sysindexkeys IK,
syscolumns SC,
sysindexes SI,
sysobjects SO
where -- Link syscolumns
IK.id=SC.id
and IK.colid=SC.colid
-- Link sysindexes
and IK.id=SI.id
and IK.indid=SI.indid
-- Link sysObjects (tables)
and IK.id=SO.id
and SO.xtype='U'
-- no internal indexes
and SI.name not like '_WA_Sys_%'
and SI.name not like 'hind_%'
--step 2: view to get # of columns per index
create view cantcolsidx
as select tabname,
idxname,
count(*) as numllaves
from listaidxcols
group by tabname,idxname
-- step 3
-- the redundant index list
select A.tabname as tabla,A.idxname as Aidx, B.idxname as Bidx
from cantcolsidx A, cantcolsidx B
where A.tabname = B.tabname
and A.numllaves < B.numllaves
and A.idxname <> B.idxname
and A.numllaves in (
select count(*)
from listaidxcols C, listaidxcols D
where C.tabname=A.tabname
and C.idxname=A.idxname
and D.tabname=B.tabname
and D.idxname=B.idxname
and C.idxname<>D.idxname
and C.colname=D.colname
and C.keyno =D.keyno
)
--clean up
drop view listaidxcols;
drop view cantcolsidx;
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 15, 2007
any tutorial on how to setup SQL Server in a dual redundant environment ?
thanks
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
edit: this came out longer than I thought, any comments about anythinghere is greatly appreciated. thank you for readingMy system stores millions of records, each with fields like firstname,lastname, email address, city, state, zip, along with any number of userdefined fields. The application allows users to define message templateswith variables. They can then select a template, and for each variablein the template, type in a value or select a field.The system allows you to query for messages you've sent by specifyingcriteria for the variables (not the fields).This requirement has made it difficult to normalize my datamodel at allfor speed. What I have is this:[fieldindex]id int PKname nvarchartype datatype[recordindex]id int PK....[recordvalues]recordid int PKfieldid int PKvalue nvarcharwhenever messages are sent, I store which fields were mapped to whatvariables for that deployment. So the query with a variable criterialooks like this:select coalesce(vm.value, rv.value)from sentmessages sminner join variablemapping vm on vm.deploymentid=sm.deploymentidleft outer join recordvalues rv onrv.recordid=sm.recordid and rv.fieldid=vm.fieldidwhere coalesce(vm.value, rv.value) ....this model works pretty well for searching messages with variablecriteria and looking up variable values for a particular message. thebig problem I have is that the recordvalues table is HUGE, 1 millionrecords with 50 fields each = 50 million recordvalues rows. The value,two int columns plus the two indexes I have on the table make it into abeast. Importing data takes forever. Querying the records (with a fieldcriteria) also takes longer than it should.makes sense, the performance was largely IO bound.I decided to try and cut into that IO. looking at a recordvalues tablewith over 100 million rows in it, there were only about 3 million uniquevalues. so I split the recordvalues table into two tables:[recordvalues]recordid int PKfieldid int PKvalueid int[valueindex]id int PKvalue nvarchar (unique)now, valueindex holds 3 million unique values and recordvaluesreferences them by id. to my suprise this shaved only 500mb off a 4gbdatabase!importing didn't get any faster either, although it's no longer IO boundit appears the cpu as the new bottleneck outweighed the IO bottleneck.this is probably because I haven't optimized the queries for the newtables (was hoping it wouldn't be so hard w/o the IO problem).is there a better way to accomplish what I'm trying to do? (eliminatethe redundant data).. does SQL have built-in constructs to do stuff likethis? It seems like maybe I'm trying to duplicate functionality at ahigh level that may already exist at a lower level.IO is becoming a serious bottleneck.the million record 50 field csv file is only 500mb. I would've thoughtthat after eliminating all the redundant first name, city, last name,etc it would be less data and not 8x more!-GordonPosted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services----------------------------------------------------------** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **----------------------------------------------------------http://www.usenet.com
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 4, 2007
Hi All,
I recently updated my Sql Server 2000 to 2005. I have around 150 stored procedures which are used to produce reporting.
They all worked perfect on 2000 and I was wondering if there were any redundant function or changes in syntax in the 2005 that i should look out for.
Can anyone assist?
Many thanks in advance,
Kurt
View 6 Replies
View Related
Aug 18, 2015
I'm looking for clarification around how SQL 2014 would get licensed if a server only has 1 of 2 CPU sockets in use (second socket being empty). I know the new license model is Core based, not Socket based. So does this mean that if I buy a "4 core pack" to cover my first CPU (quad core CPU), I am compliant with the license model? Or does Microsoft want me to license an empty socket with a Core Pack too? Its hard to find a rack mount server that only has 1 CPU socket. And the ones I do find don't have enough RAM slots or redundant power supplies.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 12, 2008
All,
I have a situation where I need to identify redundant rows within a table. Here is the schema of the table:
create table Temp.Response (
TempKey int identity(1,1) not null primary key clustered,
ResponseId char(27) not null,
StudentUin char(9) not null,
TemplateId char(27) not null,
MidEndFlag char(3) not null
)
Here is a sample dataset that represents the production data:
TempKey | ResponseId | StudentUin | TemplateId | MidEndFlag
1 2008-02-12-08-10-43-3434648 317003316 2008-01-31-10-12-27-4882454 Mid
2 2008-02-12-08-11-40-5279829 317003316 2008-01-31-10-12-27-4882454 Mid
3 2008-02-11-21-29-12-1254611 516007344 2008-01-31-10-32-26-2359751 Mid
4 2008-02-11-21-30-34-7326988 516007344 2008-01-31-10-32-26-2359751 Mid
5 2008-02-11-21-31-24-2804312 516007344 2008-01-31-10-32-26-2359751 Mid
6 2008-02-11-21-31-47-1742947 516007344 2008-01-31-10-32-26-2359751 Mid
7 2008-02-11-18-52-25-3689636 614001463 2008-01-31-10-32-26-2359751 Mid
8 2008-02-11-18-54-11-7500029 614001463 2008-01-31-10-32-26-2359751 Mid
9 2008-02-11-22-13-59-9139208 614001606 2008-01-31-10-32-26-2359751 Mid
10 2008-02-11-22-14-50-5822454 614001606 2008-01-31-10-32-26-2359751 Mid
11 2008-02-11-22-15-47-6257351 614001606 2008-01-31-10-32-26-2359751 Mid
12 2008-02-11-23-23-31-4431851 614001756 2008-01-31-10-32-26-2359751 Mid
13 2008-02-11-23-24-06-4806990 614001756 2008-01-31-10-32-26-2359751 Mid
I need to identify the ResponseId values for rows that contain redundant StudentUin/TemplateId/MidEndFlag values, so that I can delete those rows. ResponseId, while not the primary key, is a unique value in this dataset. I thought I might use a cursor to parse this, but the real dataset is exceedingly large, and would like a set-based solution.
Best,
B.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 27, 2008
Hello everybody,
have following problem:
I need info from 2 Tables. from the Table 2 I just need 1 column. When i ask for this column the output I get is data repeating themselve many times.
Distinct, should give me unique data, but is doesnt....
the code:
SELECT DISTINCT FSenddate, FSupplyIDName, FSupplyerNumber,FBillNo,FSourceBillNo,FItemName,FItemModel,
FAuxQty,FAuxTaxPrice,FHeadSelfP0237
FROM vwICBill_26
WHERE FSenddate BETWEEN DATEADD(dd,-14,GETDATE()) AND GETDATE()
This code just works in Table1 (vwICBill_26)
but with table 2 (vwICBill_1)
SELECT DISTINCT vwICBill_26.FSenddate,vwICBill_26.FSupplyIDName,
vwICBill_26.FSupplyerNumber,vwICBill_26.FBillNo,
vwICBill_26.FSourceBillNo,vwICBill_26.FItemName,
vwICBill_26.FItemModel,vwICBill_26.FAuxQty,
vwICBill_26.FAuxTaxPrice,vwICBill_26.FHeadSelfP0237,
vwICBill_1.FDate,vwICBill_1.FContractBillNo
FROM vwICBill_26,vwICBill_1
WHERE vwICBill_26.FSenddate BETWEEN DATEADD(dd,-14,GETDATE()) AND GETDATE()
AND vwICBill_1.FContractBillNo=vwICBill_26.FSourceBillNo
The last sentence is the problem
I want that it shows me the data that is not equal.
As soon as I implement the not equal it shows me the massive repeating data.
I mean even without the last sentence I get this data output.
All together, I want a clear database output without data repeating.
Any ideas how it may work without DISTINCT?
I think this problem is a typical amateure problem, but I would apreciate help!
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 20, 2007
My server is a dual AMD x64 2.19 GHz with 8 GB RAM running under Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition with service pack 1 installed. We have SQL 2000 32-bit Enterprise installed in the default instance. AWE is enabled using Dynamically configured SQL Server memory with 6215 MB minimum memory and 6656 maximum memory settings.
I have now installed, side-by-side, SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Edition in a separate named instance. Everything is running fine but I believe SQL Server2005 could run faster and need to ensure I am giving it plenty of resources. I realize AWE is not needed with SQL Server 2005 and I have seen suggestions to grant the SQL Server account the 'lock pages in memory' rights. This box only runs the SQL 2000 and SQL 2005 server databases and I would like to ensure, if possible, that each is splitting the available memory equally, at least until we can retire SQL Server 2000 next year. Any suggestions?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Aug 10, 2007
Hi,
We have an old machine which holds SQL server 2000 database. We need to migrate a whole database to a new machine which has SQL server 2005.
When we tried to move whole database using Import and Export Wizard, only tables can be selected to import/export. However we want to import/export the whole database, including tables, stored procedure, view, etc. Which tool should we use?
Thanks.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 10, 2007
Hi,
We have an old machine which holds SQL server 2000 database. We need to migrate a whole database to a new machine which has SQL server 2005.
When we tried to move whole database using Import and Export Wizard, only tables can be selected to import/export. However we want to import/export the whole database, including tables, stored procedure, view, etc. Which tool should we use?
Thanks.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 6, 2007
Hi,
When I am trying to access SQL Server 2000 database from another machine i got this error
Server: MSg 17, Level 16, State 1 [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][DBNETLIB]SQL Server does not exist or access denied
but I could access the database on same server and in that server i could access other databases in different server.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2008
When I proposed start to use SQL Server 2005 for new VS 2005 web sites, one of my co-workers responded that
we will update the old SQL Server 2000 databases to SQL Server 2005 when we are ready to use 2005 SQL Server.
Questions:
1. Any expected problems to upgrade old 2000 databases to new 2005 SQL Server?
2. I have installed both 2005/Management Studio Express and 2000/Enterprise Manager in my PC. Any expected
problems when running both 2000 and 2005 SQL Server at the same database server?
3. What is the best configuration for running SQL Server 2005 when we have old 2000 databases? Upgade or not upgrade?
TIA,
Jeffrey
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 20, 2007
I am getteing
need help
Query analyzer error Unable to connect server local Msg17, level 16,state 1
ODBC SQL server driver [DBNETLIB]SQL server does not exist
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 3, 2008
Hi,
I am having a problem connecting my .net applications from the application server to the database server. When I run the application from my windows xp (sp2) box it works fine. When I try to connect via SQL Management Studio to the database server from the application server I get the same error.
Here is the error:
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections. (provider: Named Pipes Provider, error: 40 - Could not open a connection to SQL Server)
Here is the Environment:
App Server:
Windows Server 2003 Standard Edition
Inside Company's Firewall/ Network
Database Server:
Windows Server 2000 Advanced Edition
SQL Server 2000 SP4
Remote Connections to the Server is checked
Enable Protocols: Named Pipes & TCP/IP
TCP/IP Port: 1402 (I don't know why it isn't the default of 1433)
The db server is sitting out side the Company's firewall (don't ask me why). I can access it fine from inside the firewall on my XP box but not from windows server 2003. There is a web server outside the our network that also connects to the db server with no problem and that is running Windows Server 2003 Web Edition.
I can ping the db server from the app server using the IP address.
I tried using the IP address and the port 1402 in my connection string but that didn't work from any machine (XP and Server).
I imagine the issue is somehow related to the company's firewall but why would it only block Windows Server 2003 and not XP?
What do I tell the network admin to change?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Oran
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 4, 2013
if you can restore a database to Server B using Server A as the service. Meaning we would issue the command on Server A but somehow point to Server B as where we want the restore to happen.
The backup file would be in a location independent of both servers.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
Dear all,On Win2000 server with SP3, I am trying to access a SQL Server 7.0database, "TestDB", from VB6 via a SQL Server ODBC system DSN using ADO2.7. In SQL Server Enterprise Manager, there is a login named "Tester".In its property window, NO "Server Roles" was assigned but its"Database Access" was set to "TestDB". This login was also made as theuser of "TestDB" with "public", "db_datareader" and "db_datawriter"selected as its "Database role membership". All the tables I am tryingto access in "TestDB" were created under "Tester".My code is like:Set conn = New ADODB.Connectionconn.Open "DSN=TestDSN;UID=Tester;PWD=test"Set cmd = New ADODB.Commandcmd.ActiveConnection = conncmd.CommandText = SQLset rs = cmd.Execute()If I set the SQL to something like "SELECT * FROM tbl_test", I alwaysget an error of "-2147217865" saying "[Microsoft][ODBC SQL ServerDriver][SQL Server] Invalid object name tbl_test". If I set the SQL to"SELECT * FROM Tester.tbl_test", everything runs properly. Could anyoneplease kindly advise why the first SQL is not working? Or in otherwords, why must I prefix the table name with its owner while the DBconnection is already made under that owner name? Thanks in advance.Tracy
View 10 Replies
View Related
Sep 20, 2006
When I try to migrate a database on a SQL Server 2000 server to a SQL Server 2005 server with the Copy Database Wizard of the SQL Server Management Studio, I'm confronted with the following problem;
Performing operation...
- Add log for package (Success)
- Add task for transferring database objects (Success)
- Create package (Success)
- Start SQL Server Agent Job (Success)
- Execute SQL Server Agent Job (Error)
Messages
* The job failed. Check the event log on the destination server for details. (Copy Database Wizard)
When I take a look at 'Event viewer' on the SQL 2005 server, the following error is displayed;
InnerException-->An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server.
When connecting to SQL Server 2005,
this failure may be caused by the fact
that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections.
(provider: Named Pipes Provider, error: 40 - Could not open a connection to SQL Server)
I already enabled the MSSQLSERVER network configuration protocols (TCP/IP and Named Pipes ).
How do I solve this problem?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jan 22, 2008
My site works fine in VWD2008 express, but I get this error when I try to use it on my live website.
An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections.
According to this article: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/914277 I am supposed to:
1.
Click Start, point to Programs, point to Microsoft SQL Server 2005, point to Configuration Tools, and then click SQL Server Surface Area Configuration.
Ok, there is no such program in this folder. The only thing in there is "SQL Server Error and Usage Reporting"...
The other thing I am greatly concerned with is this: All is want is for my webpages to be able to access my database for user authentication. I DO NOT want to grant the internet rights to remote connect to my database.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 24, 2008
Hi All,
Please some one help me...
I have to insert a csv into one table in sql server. But the problem is the file is in one server and SQL SERVER 2005 is in other server..
how do i insert the file....
please help me.....
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 31, 2006
Hi Guys,
I have had SQL Server Express and Sql Server Management Studio Express installed on my machine for some time and recently tried to install a trial of SQL Server 2005 as well. (Yes, I'm migrating from Visual Studio Express to Visual Studio Professional, just as in tended!)
Everything went fine except that nothing seemed to be installed. I searched in all the obvious places - both on the Start/Programs menu and on the hard-drive: nothing.
A check under Add/Remove Programs showed that Sql Server 2005 Express was installed, but called SQL Server 2005.
So after a number of retries in which the install program kept saying that there was nothing to install, I selected every option under Advanced in the intall process. This resulted in stuff being installed and I now have SQL Server 2005 running on my machine, but no SQL Server Manager icon.
My questions are:
Where can I find the SQL Server Manager executeable?
Has anyone installed SQL Server Express, SQL Server Mangement Studio Express, SQL Server 2005 and SQL Server Management Studio on a single machine successfully? If so, what order did you install them in? (I'm planning on uninstalling everything SXQL Server related and starting again.)
Thanks very much for your help.
Regards
Gary
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
Hi,Is it possible to install on a Windows server 2003,SQL SERVER 2000 in the folowing configuration :SQL server 7.0 as a default InstanceandSQL server 2000 as a named instance.Thanks for your answer.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 4, 2007
Hi
I have created a linked server from SQL Server 2005 (SP 1) to SQL Service 2000 (SP 4) with a sql server login that is available on both servers but with different passwords and permissions.
I am getting the following error while accessing the linked server in management studio based on the scenario given below ;
------ Error Message Starts
OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "(SQL Server 2000 instance name)" returned message "Communication link failure".
Msg 10054, Level 16, State 1, Line 0
TCP Provider: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host.
Msg 18456, Level 14, State 1, Line 0
Login failed for user 'abc'.
------ Error Message Ends
Consider login name is abc.
Now this login abc has sysadmin rights on sql server 2005.
The same login abc has only db_datareader rights on sql server 2000 on just one database and is not associated with any fixed server role.
I have configured the linked server using the following options;
1. I have tried impersonating login from SQL Server 2005 to SQL Server 2000 .
2. I have also tried specifying remote login / password option.
Anyone having any idea, would be of great help.
Regards,
Salman Shehbaz.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 22, 2007
i did "Linked server" between To Servers , and it's Working.
---------------------------
For Example :
Server 1 =S1.
Server = S2.
i create table in S1 : name = TblS1
i create same table in S2 : name TblS2
and i create trigger(name tr_cpD) From S1 in TblS1 For send data To TblS2 in S2
/****************** trigger Code ***************
CREATE TRIGGER dbo.tr_cpD
ON dbo.TblS1
AFTER INSERT
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
insert into [S2].[dbname].[dbo].[TblS2] Select ID,Name from insertedEND
**************************************************
result is :
Msg 7399, Level 16, State 1, Procedure tr_cpD, Line 14
The OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "S2" reported an error. The provider did not give any information about the error.
Msg 7312, Level 16, State 1, Procedure tr_cpD, Line 14
Invalid use of schema or catalog for OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "S2". A four-part name was supplied, but the provider does not expose the necessary interfaces to use a catalog or schema.
how i can execute this trigger
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 7, 2008
Hello,
I have an intranet environment consists of two servers:
- An application server windows 2003 server with 64-bit server Sharepoint 2007 SP1 (Standard version for search)
- A database server windows 2003 server with 64-bit SQL Server 2005 SP2 64-bit (Standard - 9.0.3054)
It happens regularly that the database server crash (frozen black screen) while the application server indexes (crawl) the content of the intranet site based on sharepoint. There is no alert / error in the observer of events, nor in the sql logs.
The crash is uncertain: dice once all goes well, soon after that crash. When i set the parameter search service (service management research), I can define a regulatory impact of the robot to change the number of documents at the same time : "Request 2 documents at the same time, the crash is more rare, "ask 64 documents at a time, the crash is more common.
My Intranet under sharepoint is composed of a collection site with a dozen sub-sites. There are 3 large library of PDF document. All done in the 4 go in terms of volume.
My problem for about 3-4 months. (Maybe more. Before, indexing was not yet in place).
Someone could help me? Thank you
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 18, 2007
Can I connect from a SQL Server 2005 database to a SQL Server 2000 database, without establishing a linked server connection.
I need to fire a SELECT query on a SQL Server 2000 database, but don't want to add it as a linked server. Is there any way I can do this or its not possible??
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 15, 2008
Hi all,
Please tell me about difference between SQL Server 2005 and SQL Server 2008 SSRS(Sql Server report)
Why to upgrade for Sql Server 2008
Thanks,
Ashok
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 28, 2005
I have a Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise server which I need to set up as a linked server in SQL Server 2005. The Sybase server is version 12.5.2, and the Sybase ODBC driver version is 4.20.00.67. I have already installed the Sybase client software on the server.
I also created a SystemDSN on the SQL Server to connect to the Sybase server. I tested the connection and it was able to connect.
I ran the following code to create the linked server:
<code>
EXEC master.dbo.sp_addlinkedserver @server = N'LinkedServerName', @srvproduct=N'Sybase', @provider=N'MSDASQL', @datasrc=N'Sybase System DSN', @provstr=N'"Provider=Sybase.ASEOLEDBProvider;Server Name=servername,5000;Initial Catalog=databasename;User Id=username;Password=password"'
</code>
I then ran sp_tables_ex to make sure I could view the tables in the Sybase database. Here is the error message I get:
<code>
OLE DB provider "MSDASQL" for linked server "LinkedServerName" returned message "[DataDirect][ODBC Sybase Wire Protocol driver]Error parsing connect string at offset 13. ".
Msg 7303, Level 16, State 1, Procedure sp_tables_ex, Line 41
Cannot initialize the data source object of OLE DB provider "MSDASQL" for linked server "LinkedServerName".
</code>
Any ideas what is happening here?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Dec 10, 2007
I get the following error and have been trying to figure out why I keep getting it. Initially, I had placed my project under wwwroot folder and ran it under IIS and it gave this error. Then I moved it to my local C drive and same thing. I am sharing this project with two other co-workers and all our config files and code files are same...they don't get this error but I do. I checked that SQL Server Client Network Utility has TCP/IP and the 'Named Pipes' enabled. I thought maybe I have setting in the Visual Studio 2005 that I'm not aware of that's causing this problem...it can't be the server since my co-workers aren't having this error and can't be anything in the code since all of us are sharing this project through vss. I dont' think using different version of .net framework can create this error. I changed the version from 2.0 to use 1.1x and it gave same error... Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Server Error in '/RBOdev' Application.
An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections. (provider: SQL Network Interfaces, error: 26 - Error Locating Server/Instance Specified)
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections. (provider: SQL Network Interfaces, error: 26 - Error Locating Server/Instance Specified)Source Error:
An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below. Stack Trace:
[SqlException (0x80131904): An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections. (provider: SQL Network Interfaces, error: 26 - Error Locating Server/Instance Specified)]
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection) +739123
System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj) +188
System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.Connect(ServerInfo serverInfo, SqlInternalConnectionTds connHandler, Boolean ignoreSniOpenTimeout, Int64 timerExpire, Boolean encrypt, Boolean trustServerCert, Boolean integratedSecurity, SqlConnection owningObject) +685966
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.AttemptOneLogin(ServerInfo serverInfo, String newPassword, Boolean ignoreSniOpenTimeout, Int64 timerExpire, SqlConnection owningObject) +109
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.LoginNoFailover(String host, String newPassword, Boolean redirectedUserInstance, SqlConnection owningObject, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, Int64 timerStart) +383
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.OpenLoginEnlist(SqlConnection owningObject, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, String newPassword, Boolean redirectedUserInstance) +181
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds..ctor(DbConnectionPoolIdentity identity, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, Object providerInfo, String newPassword, SqlConnection owningObject, Boolean redirectedUserInstance) +170
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnectionFactory.CreateConnection(DbConnectionOptions options, Object poolGroupProviderInfo, DbConnectionPool pool, DbConnection owningConnection) +130
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.CreatePooledConnection(DbConnection owningConnection, DbConnectionPool pool, DbConnectionOptions options) +28
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.CreateObject(DbConnection owningObject) +424
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.UserCreateRequest(DbConnection owningObject) +66
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.GetConnection(DbConnection owningObject) +496
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection) +82
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.OpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory) +105
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open() +111
System.Web.DataAccess.SqlConnectionHolder.Open(HttpContext context, Boolean revertImpersonate) +84
System.Web.DataAccess.SqlConnectionHelper.GetConnection(String connectionString, Boolean revertImpersonation) +197
System.Web.UI.WebControls.WebParts.SqlPersonalizationProvider.GetConnectionHolder() +16
System.Web.UI.WebControls.WebParts.SqlPersonalizationProvider.LoadPersonalizationBlobs(WebPartManager webPartManager, String path, String userName, Byte[]& sharedDataBlob, Byte[]& userDataBlob) +195
System.Web.UI.WebControls.WebParts.PersonalizationProvider.LoadPersonalizationState(WebPartManager webPartManager, Boolean ignoreCurrentUser) +95
System.Web.UI.WebControls.WebParts.WebPartPersonalization.Load() +105
System.Web.UI.WebControls.WebParts.WebPartManager.OnInit(EventArgs e) +497
System.Web.UI.Control.InitRecursive(Control namingContainer) +321
System.Web.UI.Control.InitRecursive(Control namingContainer) +198
System.Web.UI.Control.InitRecursive(Control namingContainer) +198
System.Web.UI.Control.InitRecursive(Control namingContainer) +198
System.Web.UI.Control.InitRecursive(Control namingContainer) +198
System.Web.UI.Control.InitRecursive(Control namingContainer) +198
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +692
Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:2.0.50727.832; ASP.NET Version:2.0.50727.832
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2008
An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections. (provider: Named Pipes Provider,
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 10, 2008
Hi,I have SQL Server Express Edition. I tried working out some ASP.NET Labs in my local system. Here is the link of the Virtual Lab which I tried. http://msevents.microsoft.com/CUI/WebCastEventDetails.aspx?EventID=1032286906&EventCategory=3&culture=en-US&CountryCode=USI recieve this error in my local system. An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections. (provider: Named Pipes Provider, error: 40 - Could not open a connection to SQL Server)I tried working out solutions from various websites. But the no solution is effective. Could anyone help me in solving this issue.
View 1 Replies
View Related
