I would like a stored proc to be fed the table name as a paramater.
I tried below
create procedure testit as
set nocount on
declare @tblnm varchar(50)
select * from @tblnm
but it get Server: Msg 170, Level 15, State 1, Procedure testit, Line 5
Line 5: Incorrect syntax near '@tblnm'.
Any idea
Hello All
I have the following problem running an sp with a table variable (sql server 2000) - the error which occurs at the end of the query is: "must declare the variable @THeader" . @THeader is the name of the variable table and the error occurs with such references as @THeader.ApplyAmt, @THeader.TransactionHeaderID, etc.
declare @THeader TABLE (
TransactionHeaderID [int] NOT NULL ,
PatientID [int] NOT NULL ,
TransactionAllocationAmount [money] NOT NULL ,
ApplyAmt [money] NULL ) - create table variable
insert into @THeader select TransactionHeaderID,PatientID,TransactionAllocationAmount,ApplyAmt from mtblTransactionHeader where PatientID = 9 - fill the table variable
UPDATE @THeader
set TransactionAllocationAmount =
(SELECT isnull(Sum(mtblTransactionAllocation.Amount),0)
FROM mtblTransactionAllocation where mtblTransactionAllocation.DRID = TransactionHeaderID or
mtblTransactionAllocation.CRID = TransactionHeaderID) from @THeader, mtblTransactionAllocation - do the updates on the table variable
Update @THeader
set ApplyAmt = (SELECT mtblTransactionAllocation.Amount
FROM mtblTransactionAllocation where mtblTransactionAllocation.DRID = TransactionHeaderID and
mtblTransactionAllocation.CRID = 187 and PatientID = 9) from @THeader, mtblTransactionAllocation - do the updates on the table variable
- below is where the problems occur. It occurs with statements referencing columns in the table variable, i.e. @THeader.ApplyAmt
UPDATE mtblTransactionHeader
SET mtblTransactionHeader.TransactionAllocationAmount = @THeader.TransactionAllocationAmount,
mtblTransactionHeader.ApplyAmt = @THeader.ApplyAmt
FROM @THeader, mtblTransactionHeader
WHERE @THeader.TransactionHeaderID = mtblTransactionHeader.TransactionHeaderID - put the values back into original table
Thanks in advance
smHaig
Hi all,
I wonder if there is anybody that can help with this one.
As you know, you can pass variables into a stored procedure and then use these variables for table names, columns etc.
Now, you also know that you can access another database on the same server just by typing the name of it into your query.
The hard part:
Instead of hardcoding the database name into the stored procedure i want to use a variable and then pass this to reference the database name, in the same way you would reference anything else with a variable. I need to do this as i have to search for various results across multiple databases.
We currently use SQL server 2000 standard, though are looking into SQL 2005 - especially is this problem is easy to resolve in the latter.
Look forward to your help
Regards
Darren
For example, the table below, has a foreign key (ManagerId) that points to EmployeeId (primary key) of the same table.
-------Employees table--------
EmployeeID . . . . . . . . . . int
Name . . . . . . . . . . . nvarchar(50)
ManagerID . . . . . . . . . . . int
If someone gave you an ID of a manager, and asked you to get him all employee names who directly or indirectly report to this manager.
How can that be achieved?
I have a table called ADSCHL which contains the school_code as Primary key and other two table as
RGDEGR(common field as SCHOOl_code) and RGENRl( Original_school_code) which are refrencing the ADSCHL. if a school_code will be updated both the table RGDEGR (school_code) and RGERNL ( original_schoolcode) has to be updated as well. I have been provided a new data that i have imported to SQL server using SSIS with table name as TESTCEP which has a column name school_code. I have been assigned a task to update the old school_code vale ( ADSCHL) with new school_code ( TESTCEP) and make sure the changes happen across all 3 tables.
I tried using Merge Update function not sure if this is going to work.
Update dbo.ADSCHL
SET dbo.ADSCHL.SCHOOL_CODE = FD.SCHOOL_Code
FROM dbo.ADSCHL AD
INNER JOIN TESTCEP FD
ON AD.SCHOOL_NAME = FD.School_Name
I have one table that has unique id's associated with each row of information. I want to delete rows of information in one table that have a unique ID that references information in another table.
Here is a basic breakdown of what I am trying to do:
Table1 (the table where the rows need to be deleted from)
Column_x (Holds the id that is unique to the various rows of data - User ID)
Table2 (Holds the user information & has the associated ID)
Column_z (holds the User ID)
I tried this on a test set of tables and could not get it to work. What I am trying to do is skip all rows of Table1 that have ID's present in Table2, and delete the rows of ID's that are not present in Table2.
Code:
SELECT Column_z
FROM dbo.Table2
DELETE FROM dbo.Table1
WHERE Column_z <> Column_x
This did not seem to do what I needed, it did not delete any rows at all.
I wanted it to delete all rows in Table1 that did not have a reference to a user ID that matched any ID's in Column_z of Table2
Then I tried another scenerio that I also needed to do:
Code:
SELECT Column_z, Column_a
FROM dbo.Table2
DELETE FROM dbo.Table1
WHERE Column_z = Column_x AND Column_a='0'
'0' being the user id is inactive so I wanted to delete rows in Table1 and remove all references to users that were in an inactive status in Table2.
Neither one of the Queries wanted to work for me in the Query Analyzer when I ran them. It just said (0) rows affected.
Any ideas on what I am doing wrong here?
IF OBJECT_ID('tTable') IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE tTable
GO
CREATE TABLE tTable
(nRow_IdINTEGER IDENTITY NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
nParent_IdINTEGERNULL,
[Code] ....
gives:
nRow_Id nParent_Id cGroup cValue
----------- ----------- ------- ------
1 1 One A
2 1 One B
3 2 One C
I want to insert a copy of this data, but w/ group = 'TWO', so the table will contain the additional rows
4 4 Two A
5 4 Two B
6 5 Tow C
Hi,
I'm using MS SQL 2005 Express.
CREATE TABLE Folder (
iD int NOT NULL IDENTITY (1, 1) PRIMARY KEY,
folderName varchar(50) NOT NULL,
parentFolderID int NULL
FOREIGN KEY REFERENCES Folder (iD)
)
GO
if I add an ON DELETE CASCADE to the foreign key, then i get an error... which is annoying. If a folder is deleted, then all its sub-folders should also be automatically deleted.
The error is: 'Introducing FOREIGN KEY constraint 'FK__Folder__parentFo__7D78A4E7' on table 'Folder' may cause cycles or multiple cascade paths. Specify ON DELETE NO ACTION or ON UPDATE NO ACTION, or modify other FOREIGN KEY constraints.'
Anyone got any advice?
Hi
Im trying to create an update statement which references two tables (join) and has a CASE clause attached. Not sure where im going wrong...
Using T-sql!!!
update import set import.gone =
from import
inner join stat
ON stat.id = import.id
CASE
WHEN stat.A = import.field2 THEN import.gone = sec.A
WHEN stat.B = import.field2 THEN import.gone = sec.B
WHEN stat.C = import.field2 THEN import.gone = sec.C
WHEN stat.D = import.field2 THEN import.gone = sec.D
WHEN stat.E = import.field2 THEN import.gone = sec.E
WHEN stat.F = import.field2 THEN import.gone = sec.F
ELSE import.gone = null
END
Any help would be greatly appreciated
How do i insert data into multiple tables. Lets say i have 2 tables: Schedules and Event
Schedules data is entered into the Schedules Table first
then now i need to insert Event table's data by refrencing the (PK ID) from the schedules table.
How do i insert data into Event table referencing the (PK ID) from Schedules Table ?
Fields inside each of the tables can be found below:
Event Table
(PK,FK) ScheduleID
EventTitle
AccountManager
Presenter
EventStatus
Comment
Schedule Table
(PK) ID
AletrnateID
name
UserID
UserName
StartTime
EndTime
ReserveSource
Status
StatusRetry
NextStatusDateTime
StatusRemarks
I have a table that holds a ParentID and the RecordID. There is a column called IsEnabled which is a bit field indicating if a folder can be displayed or not. 0 = NO, 1 = YESThe table is for a directory structure which is virtual and displays folders on a web page.Root----- 1---------- 1-1---------- 1- 2----------------- 1-2-1----------------- 1-2-2----------------------- 1-2-2-1----------------- 1-2-3----------------- 1-2-4---------- 1- 3---------- 1- 4I need a query that will not select any children that are under a Parent that is disabled. So if ' 1- 2 ' is disabled then:---------- 1- 2----------------- 1-2-1----------------- 1-2-2----------------------- 1-2-2-1----------------- 1-2-3----------------- 1-2-4SHOULD NOT SHOW.Can anyone give me a query that will overcome this problem i have.-J
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a very simple bit of code.
SELECT dbo.MF_PATIENT.Forename,
dbo.MF_PATIENT.Surname,
dbo.MF_PATIENT.DOB,
dbo.MF_PATIENT.Postcode,
Count(dbo.MF_PATIENT.HEYNo) AS CountOfHEYNo
[Code] ....
My issue is I want to run this bit of code but only if dbo_MF_PATIENT.MFPatientID appears in any of the 3 tables below:
dbo_ED_ATTENDANCE, dbo_OP_APPOINTMENT, dbo_IP_ADMISSION
Suppose im unsure on the joining because there is only ever one patient in the
dbo_MF_PATIENT table but they could appear dozens of times in any of the other 3 tables.
I have an Employee table that has
EmployeeID (PK)
SupervisorID (which is really just another EmployeeID)
..random junk...
Now that part makes sense, everyone gets one and only one boss.
Their boss can change, and therefore the SupervisorID would be updated.
Now I have an EmployeeEvals table that has quarterly evaluation data.
I want to relate these two tables.
Eval table has
EvalID (PK)
ReviewedEmployeeID (the one being evaluated)
SupervisorID (the one doing the evaluation)
Now I need to link this back to the employee table (at least I think I do).
So I would want to relate it by the ReviewedEmployeeID going back to EmployeeID in the employee table and I also want the SupervisorID to do the same...
But of course that won't work because that would seem to indicate that a single record on the Employees table (say EmployeeID 55) should have a matching (or could) record in the Eval table that would look like
EvalID: 12345
ReviewedEmployeeID: 55
SupervisorID: 55
which of course wouldn't happen as an employee wouldn't evaluate themself.
How do I handle the relationships for this properly?
Do I just not link the SupervisorID back to anything?
I've recently finished an application for a small company with perhaps two hundred employees. Each employee was set up in a Users table in the database, against which application logins were processed.
For just about every other table in the database, other than pure lookup tables, we created columns to indicate the user who created the entry, and the user who last modified the entry. This was done using FK references back to the Users table. Each table contains two references back to the Users table, and there are over 150 tables now that follow this scheme. At first I was not concerned, other than the fact that it makes a visual picture of the data model look very confusing (almost every table has a pair of links back to the Users table), until I encountered an issue where I could no longer delete from the Users table. Upon surpassing 253 FK references to Users, I can no longer delete users, as the Query Optimizer can't complete the query.
Now, all of that so far is really not a big deal. Deleting users was never my intent anyway. The only real question I have is whether this is the standard way of maintaining history for table records. Have others used this method? Is there a better way?
Setup:
Using SQL 2005
TableA
ID INT PK
Name VARCHAR
RefID FK
ID Name RefID
1 Test1 <NULL>
2 Test1a 1
3 Test1b 1
4 Test1b1 3
5 Test1b1a 4
CREATE TRIGGER Update_ID
ON TableA INSTEAD OF UPDATE
AS
IF UPDATE(ID)
BEGIN
DECLARE @old_ID INT
DECLARE @new_ID INT
SELECT @old_ID = ID FROM DELETED
SELECT @new_ID = ID FROM INSERTED
UPDATE TableA
SET ID = @new_ID
WHERE ID = @old_ID
UPDATE TableA
SET RefID = @new_ID
WHERE RefID = @old_ID
END
SPROC:
UPDATE TableA
SET ID=6
WHERE ID=2
RefID is the FK to ID
ID is also the PK to another table and has the relationship use cascading Delete and Update.
Problem:
"The UPDATE statement conflicted with the SAME TABLE REFERENCE constraint"
This is referring to the first UPDATE of the Trigger.
It was my understanding that Instead Of checks the constraints after it is all done yet it errs with the first Trigger UPDATE.
I was expecting to overcome the self-reference constraint issue by using Instead Of and with the first Trigger UPDATE, change the ID(PK) and then change the RefID(FK) with the second Trigger UPDATE.
Once that was done, it should have not had any constraint problems. Thoughts?
Thanks, Nathan
We are in the conversion process of making the database ints.This is a change from a guid PK to an integer based PK that uses an int Identity. The program still uses the guid, and we are trying to map that guid to the databases int.We insert using TVPs passed from code. Since the identity is being set upon insert I have three things to accomplish:
1) Insert all the data into the dbo table
2) Update the parent Id in the table
3) Pass the SetsId guid, Sets_Id int, ParentSets_Id int back to the program
This is a high transaction table that will have a lot of records (millions).
--Sample table creation. There is a FK between Sets_Id to ParentSets_Id, Clustered PK on the Sets_Id
IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM sys.objects WHERE object_id = OBJECT_ID(N'[dbo].[JSets]') AND type in (N'U'))
BEGIN
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[JSets](
[SetsID] [uniqueidentifier] NOT NULL,
[Sets_Id] bigint Identity (1,1) NOT NULL,
[code]...
Hi everybody,
I know that it is possible for one column to reference two different parent tables by defining two foreign keys on a same column, I have done it and SQL Server does give any error. But I want to know that is it advisable to define multiple foreign key on a column referncing two differnt parent table's primary key in differnt case... ? Means If Case 1 then It should reference to column1 or table1 otherwise it should reference to table2? How is it practicle...?
An example of what I am talking about is the employee table in the Adventureworks database. This has employeeID and then ManagerID, ManagerID just being the EmployeeID of the person whom the original reports to.
I know the queries for querying this type of data and even making recursive common table expressions. What I cannot seem to find is how one goes about BUILDING said table. I see all sorts of examples where people are just doing INSERT table VALUES () manually to load the table. The problem is, I need to create a table that has potentially thousands of records.
It will essentially be a dimensional map. Don't even get me started as to they why, I will just suffice to say that is what the client and project want . I have a process that will do this now, but it is not very dynamic and very hard coded. To me, there seems like there should be some sort of standardized methodology for handling this.
Hi SQL GurusCould anyone please explain how the following stored procedure can beamended to retrieve Subordinates in alphabetical order ?The example below simply retrives records in the order in which theywere entered.It sounds very easy but I can't sort it out ?The following code was taken from Narayana Vyas Kondreddi's website(http://vyaskn.tripod.com/index.htm)Consider the employee table of an organization, that stores all theemployee records. Each employee is linked to his/her manager by amanger ID.CREATE TABLE dbo.Emp(EmpIDintPRIMARY KEY,EmpNamevarchar(30),MgrIDintFOREIGN KEY REFERENCES Emp(EmpID))GOCREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX NC_NU_Emp_MgrID ON dbo.Emp(MgrID)GOINSERT dbo.Emp SELECT 1, 'President', NULLINSERT dbo.Emp SELECT 2, 'Vice President', 1INSERT dbo.Emp SELECT 3, 'CEO', 2INSERT dbo.Emp SELECT 4, 'CTO', 2INSERT dbo.Emp SELECT 5, 'Group Project Manager', 4INSERT dbo.Emp SELECT 6, 'Project Manager 1', 5INSERT dbo.Emp SELECT 7, 'Project Manager 2', 5INSERT dbo.Emp SELECT 8, 'Team Leader 1', 6INSERT dbo.Emp SELECT 9, 'Software Engineer 1', 8INSERT dbo.Emp SELECT 10, 'Software Engineer 2', 8INSERT dbo.Emp SELECT 11, 'Test Lead 1', 6INSERT dbo.Emp SELECT 12, 'Tester 1', 11INSERT dbo.Emp SELECT 13, 'Tester 2', 11INSERT dbo.Emp SELECT 14, 'Team Leader 2', 7INSERT dbo.Emp SELECT 15, 'Software Engineer 3', 14INSERT dbo.Emp SELECT 16, 'Software Engineer 4', 14INSERT dbo.Emp SELECT 17, 'Test Lead 2', 7INSERT dbo.Emp SELECT 18, 'Tester 3', 17INSERT dbo.Emp SELECT 19, 'Tester 4', 17INSERT dbo.Emp SELECT 20, 'Tester 5', 17GOCREATE PROC dbo.ShowHierarchy(@Root int)ASBEGINSET NOCOUNT ONDECLARE @EmpID int, @EmpName varchar(30)SET @EmpName = (SELECT EmpName FROM dbo.Emp WHERE EmpID = @Root)PRINT REPLICATE('-', @@NESTLEVEL * 4) + @EmpNameSET @EmpID = (SELECT MIN(EmpID) FROM dbo.Emp WHERE MgrID = @Root)WHILE @EmpID IS NOT NULLBEGINEXEC dbo.ShowHierarchy @EmpIDSET @EmpID = (SELECT MIN(EmpID) FROM dbo.Emp WHERE MgrID = @Root ANDEmpID > @EmpID)ENDENDGOEXEC dbo.ShowHierarchy 1GO---President------Vice President---------CEO---------CTO------------Group Project Manager---------------Project Manager 1------------------Team Leader 1---------------------Software Engineer 1---------------------Software Engineer 2------------------Test Lead 1---------------------Tester 1---------------------Tester 2---------------Project Manager 2------------------Team Leader 2---------------------Software Engineer 3---------------------Software Engineer 4------------------Test Lead 2---------------------Tester 3---------------------Tester 4---------------------Tester 5
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm creating a new Integration Services Project that copies data out of a SQL 7 server, transforms it, and places the data on a SQL 2005 (SP 2) Server. When defining a lookup transformation, if I specify an OLE DB Connection to my server running SQL 7 as the reference table, as soon as I click on the Colums tab, Visual Studio closes / crashes and dumps me to windows. I don't get an error message. If however I specify a connection to a server running SQL 8, or SQL 2005, no problems.
Is this supposed to happen?
My workstation is running Windows XP Pro SP2, Visual Studio 2005 Pro.
Microsoft SQL Server Integration Services Designer
Version 9.00.1399.00
The server that doesn't work for a reference table is running Windows 2000 Server SP4
SQL 7.00.623
Thanks for your help,
Kirk
CREATE TABLE #T(branchnumber VARCHAR(4000))
insert into #t(branchnumber) values (005)
insert into #t(branchnumber) values (090)
insert into #t(branchnumber) values (115)
insert into #t(branchnumber) values (210)
insert into #t(branchnumber) values (216)
[code]....
I have a parameter which should take multiple values into it and pass that to the code that i use. For, this i created a parameter and temporarily for testing i am passing some values into it.Using a dynamic SQL i am converting multiple values into multiple records as rows into another variable (called @QUERY). My question is, how to insert the values from variable into a table (table variable or temp table or CTE).OR Is there any way to parse the multiple values into a table. like if we pass multiple values into a parameter. those should go into a table as rows.
which is more efficient...which takes less memory...how is the memory allocation done for both the types.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI don't know if it's a local issue but I can't use temp table or table variable in a PP query (so not in a stored procedure).
Environment: W7 enterprise desktop 32 + Office 2012 32 + PowerPivot 2012 32
Simple example:
declare @tTable(col1 int)
insert into @tTable(col1) values (1)
select * from @tTable
Works perfectly in SQL Server Management Studio and the database connection is OK to as I may generate PP table using complex (or simple) queries without difficulty.
But when trying to get this same result in a PP table I get an error, idem when replacing table variable by a temporary table.
Message: OLE DB or ODBC error. .... The current operation was cancelled because another operation the the transaction failed.
In a table-valued UDF, does the UDF use a table variable or a temp table to form the resultset returned?
I am trying to use a stored procedure to update a column in a sql table using the value from a variable table I getting errors because my syntax is not correct. I think table aliases are not allowed in UPDATE statements.
This is my statement:
UPDATE [dbo].[sessions_teams] stc
SET stc.[Talks] = fmt.found_talks_type
FROM @Find_Missing_Talks fmt
WHERE stc.sessionid IN (SELECT sessionid FROM @Find_Missing_Talks)
AND stc.coupleid IN (SELECT coupleid FROM @Find_Missing_Talks)
Hi there,
Can someone tell me if it is possible to add an index to a Table variable that is declare as part of a table valued function ? I've tried the following but I can't get it to work.
ALTER FUNCTION dbo.fnSearch_GetJobsByOccurrence
(
@param1 int,
@param2 int
)
RETURNS @Result TABLE (resultcol1 int, resultcol2 int)
AS
BEGIN
CREATE INDEX resultcol2_ind ON @Result
-- do some other stuff
RETURN
END
Hi all,
my stored procedure have one table variable (@t_Replenishment_Rpt).I want to create an Index on this table variable.please advise any of them in this loop...
below is my table variable and I need to create 3 indexes on this...
DECLARE @t_Replenishment_Rpt TABLE
(
Item_Nbr varchar(25) NULL,
Item_Desc varchar(255) NULL,
Trx_Date datetime NULL,
Balance int NULL,
Trx_Type char(10) NULL,
Issue_Type char(10) NULL,
Location char(25) NULL,
Min_Stock int NULL,
Order_Qty int NULL,
Unit char(10) NULL,
Issue_Qty int NULL,
Vendor varchar(10) NULL,
WO_Nbr varchar(10) NULL,
Lead_Time int NULL,
PO_Nbr char(10) NULL,
PO_Status char(10) NULL,
Currency char(10) NULL,
Last_Cost money NULL,
Dept_No varchar(20) NULL,
MSDSNbr varchar(10) NULL,
VendorName varchar(50) NULL,
Reviewed varchar(20) NULL
)
I tryed all below senarios...it is giving error...
--Indexing the @t_Replenishment_Rpt table on the column Names Item Number, Vender , Department Number
--EXEC sp_executesql(CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX Replenishment_index ON @t_Replenishment_Rpt (Item_Nbr))
--CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX Idx1 ON @t_Replenishment_Rpt.Item_Nbr
INDEX_COL ( '@t_Replenishment_Rpt' , ind_Replenishment_id , Item_Nbr )
--EXEC sp_executesql('SELECT INDEXPROPERTY('+ '@t_Replenishment_Rpt' + ', ' + 'Item_Nbr' + ',' + 'IsPadIndex' + ')')
--EXEC sp_executesql(SELECT INDEXPROPERTY('@t_Replenishment_Rpt', 'Vendor','IsPadIndex'))
--EXEC sp_executesql(SELECT INDEXPROPERTY('@t_Replenishment_Rpt', 'Dept_No','IsPadIndex'))
Hi All,Hope someone can help me...Im trying to highlight the advantages of using table variables asapposed to temp tables within single scope.My manager seems to believe that table variables are not advantageousbecause they reside in memory.He also seems to believe that temp tables do not use memory...Does anyone know how SQL server could read data from a temp tablewithout passing the data contained therein through memory???Is this a valid advantage/disadvantage of table variables VS temptables?
View 2 Replies View RelatedSQLLY challenged be gentle --Trying to create code that will drop a table using a variable as theTable Name.DECLARE @testname as char(50)SELECT @testname = 'CO_Line_of_Business_' +SUBSTRING(CAST(CD_LAST_EOM_DATEAS varchar), 5, 2) + '_' + LEFT(CAST(CD_LAST_EOM_DATE AS varchar),4)+ '_' + 'EOM'FROM TableNamePrint @testname = 'blah...blah...blah' (which is the actual tablename on the server)How can I use this variable (@testname) to drop the table? Undersevere time constraints so any help would be greatly appreciated.
View 2 Replies View RelatedIn a previous post "Could #TempTable within SP cause lock on tempdb?" http://forums.microsoft.com/msdn/showpost.aspx?postid=2691763&siteid=1
It was obvious that we have to limit the use of #Temp table to a minimum. Let assume that some of the temp tables are really difficult to replace and we have to live with them.
Would it be easier on tempdb if the #TempTable is replaced by a table variable? Or do they all end up in tempdb?
Thanks in advance for any help.
I have a stored produre. Inside this stored procedure I have table variable with one column. Once the table variable is populated with rows, I would like to pass each value in the table, into a table-valued function. The table-valued function may return any number of rows. I would like all the rows the TVF returns to be returned from the stored procedure as a single result set. I would also like to do this without defining a table variable to hold the results of the table-value function.
Code Snippet
declare @IdTable table
(
EmployeeId nvarchar( 16 ) not null
)
insert into @IdTable
select EmployeeNumber from Employees
/*
I need to run this query for every EmployeeId value in @IdTable and return the results from the stored proc as a single result set.
*/
select * from fn_GetEmployeeById( EmployeeId )
Any help is very much appreciated.
Andrew
In my stored procedure i have a multi-valued varchar(max) parameter and I wrote a table-valued function that takes the varchar(max) and return a table back to the stored procedure where i inserted into a @table. Just wondering is there a better and faster way of doing this?
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[rpt]
(
@CourtIDs as nvarchar(MAX) -- @CourtIDs = '1231,3432,1234,3421'
)
AS
--split CourtIDs into a table
DECLARE @tbCourtIDs table(CourtID int NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY)
INSERT INTO @tbCourtIDs
select * from dbo.Split(@CourtIDs, ',')
hi all, if i have a function which it returns a table and i need to work with the table retured many times in the stored procedure, then should i use a temporary table or a table variable to store the returned table ? or it's there a better way in doing that?
View 1 Replies View Related