Repl.Pending Xacts Question
Aug 2, 2006
We have VLDBs running on a SQL 2005 server. Some users have questioned speed and response times. When I investigated the server (W2K3) using the perfomrance monitor, I noticed an interesting questionabel result. The Repl. Pending Xacts showed 44,000,000 transactions waiting to be delived to the distribution databse. Problem is - we do not have replication tunred on on any of the db's on the box. In my research, I have not noticed anyone with a similiar issue. Does this amount of transaction take up space, or is it simply a counter that I don't have to be worried about?
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Aug 9, 2000
When I using Create Publication Wizard for database 'MY DATABASE', and setup 'MY SERVER' as the Distributor, then I get a message:
SQLServer Agent on 'MY SERVER' current uses a system acount, which cause replication between servers to fail. In the following dialog, specify a domain account for the Service startup account.
I don't understand this message (current in SQL Server Agent properties, tab Service startup account using System account)? Anyone can explain to me?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 11, 1999
The problem case for transactional replication in MS SQL 7.0 is as follows:
Server A (intended publisher)
Server B (distributor, intended subscriber)
When configuring replication, the distributor (B) can be configured easily; the publisher (A) that uses B as its distributor will not allow for a publication to be created using either the Enterprise Manager wizards or TSQL commands. The error '627: Cannot use SAVE TRANSACTION within a distributed transaction' occurs when creating the publication.
Any suggestions; I need some help ASAP.
Thanks
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 4, 2003
Is it safe to change 'max text repl size (B)' on a live system while it is running with users and services running?? I'm using SQL Server 7.0 running on Windows 2000.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 2, 2007
one week ago, for testing purpose, I set up trans repl, trans repl with updateable, snapshot repl using the same instance.
configuration is like this,
publisher and distributor are on the same server, 2 remote subscribers, one is 2000, the other is 2005.
It works OK, today I am trying to disable the replicaiton, clean up the machine. keep getting the errors:
an exception occurred while executing a T-SQL statement or batch
only replicaiton jobs,or job schedules can be added, modified,dropped or viewed through replicaiton SPs
could not update the distribution database subscription table, the subscription status could not be changed.
changed database context to 'master',(MSSQL SERVER error 22538)
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 12, 2007
I am trying to set up a merge replication between SQL 2005 and SQL Express. When I try to apply the snapshot to the SQL Express database. I get the error "Can not access filepathSnapshot.pre due to error OS 3"
Does anyone know what OS error 3 applies to?
Also, when I try to place the snapshop in the default folder location say D:ReplicationData the create snapshot process will work. If I try to place the snapshot folder not in the default and in a UNC like this \serverIPReplicationData I get an access error. sqlAgent has access to the share, which is fully shared out. Any ideas?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 22, 2004
I am running merge replication (SQL 2000 with SP2) with an anonymous pull subscription. The application vendor has come out with update that requires adding a table to a database. The vendor has created scripts that will add the table, as well as some stored procedures. If I apply the scripts to both servers and add the table as a new article to the publication, am I going to have to apply a snapshot of the entire database (which is very large)?
Your help is greatly appreciated.
Gary
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 15, 2006
I'm in trouble again. I want to make merge replication between SS 2000 Enterprise and SS 2005 Express edition. 2000 will be publisher, 2005 will be subscriber. In addition I want to use push subsription at 2000 side, very last thing is it will be download only (I know how to make a merge rep. downloadonly, thanks god!). That's all I want to do.
I made a little search, it seems what I want can't be done automatically, using SMO or scripts is suggested. In one of other forums I saw "distibuter>=publisher>=subsriber" (refering sql server versions). Is it an incontestable truth that I cannot make SS 2000 a publisher where SS 2005 Express is subscriber?
How can I achieve my goal, isn't there anyway to make 2000 publisher for merge replication while a 2005 Express is subscriber?
Thanks
abdul
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 14, 2007
Hi All, We are using SQL2000 servers with transact replication to a warmstand-by server. We are seeing the following error from the Log readeragents.Does anyone have any insight on this error?The process could not execute 'sp_MSadd_repl_commands27hp'TIA Scott B.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 23, 2006
Hi,
We're running a replicationprocess for months now, and 2 days ago it broke down, for no appearant reason I can detect. The setup is this:
A SQL2K server has a publication defined on a database, consisting of several dozen tables. It is a transactional publication, running continuously. There is 1 subscriber, a SQL2005. Both servers run with Win2003 and all have the latest servicepacks.
Up until 2 days ago there was hardly a problem. Then I received errormessages on being unable to load into a specific table. That table had been changed on that day, namely, 1 column was changed from CHAR(13) to CHAR(12). I do not know if this has any relation with the problem we experience.
Currently the databases are structural the same. I could not get the replicationprocess to work and deleted all, publication on server1 and subscription on server2. I tried to setup a new transactional publication, which is not a problem, however, I cannot create a succesful subscription. I receive the message:
The process could not bulkcopy into table 'Tablename', where tablename is the changed table...
Again, both tables in publisher and subscruiber are the same in all respects. When I remove the offending table from the publication, the same message now with another tablename... Removing this table will result in again this message with another tablename...
I am really flabbergasted. Any idea where to look at?
TIA
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 2, 2007
Posted - 02/01/2007 : 22:35:02
one week ago, for testing purpose, I set up trans repl, trans repl with updateable, snapshot repl using the same instance.
configuration is like this,
publisher and distributor are on the same server, 2 remote subscribers, one is 2000, the other is 2005.
It works OK, today I am trying to disable the replicaiton, clean up the machine. keep getting the errors:
an exception occurred while executing a T-SQL statement or batch
only replicaiton jobs,or job schedules can be added, modified,dropped or viewed through replicaiton SPs
could not update the distribution database subscription table, the subscription status could not be changed.
changed database context to 'master',(MSSQL SERVER error 22538)
Please help
publisher: 2005 Standard SP2 CTP
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 15, 2008
i have a small doubt
where to see the pending transactions in transactional replication
For a database can we have multiple publications
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 9, 2007
I am using SQL 2000 and have a major issue! I am new to SQL and not sure what to do about the license key being lost due to an update.
Background:
The server was originally loaded with a temp verison of SQL 2000 by the installer of the hardware until the Enterprise Edition arrived on site to insure that all the hardware worked fine. The Enterprise software was loaded onto the system and the license keys were installed. Everything has been working fine for several months. The server has been rebooted a few times after installing the license keys.
Trouble:
I loaded SP2 for Server 2003 and rebooted the server and now SQL thinks it is running the temp version and states that the license key has expired. I tried the suggested solution listed on the site of "upgrading with no changes" and the installation completes but never asks for my license keys. I rebooted the server and it states the samething thing that the temp has expired. It appears that one section can see the keys and another section does not. I have an active database that I do not want to loose but I am stumped on what to do to in order to re-install the license keys.
Any suggestions? Can copy the databases that I have created, uninstall SQL, re-install SQL from CD and then paste back my database? Will the databases restore correctly or is this to simple of a solution?
I have run out of ideas and options in order not to loose the database.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 28, 2006
Is there any command to check out any outstanding transactions not yet
replicated to subscriber DB? Thanks in advance
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 27, 2008
I'll start off by saying these questions were submitted to Microsoft and no
one can give us an answer without them doing a source code review. Their
response was "these are internal BCP scripts that are used by SQL"....yes, I
know that....that doesn't help to explain why the system created them. At
this point, I don't want my compary to pay support hours for Microsoft
personnel to learn what their software does.
--------------------
We've had merge publication in place for several years.
Last year, we added some tables/articles to publications.
After the upgrade from SQL Server 2000 SP4 Standard to SQL Server 2005 SP2
Standard, when the snapshot was run, the system created some new files that
had never existed before. Also, and more importantly, these files were only
created for the articles added after the initial snapshot was created.
Articles existing in the intial snapshot did not have these type of files
created.
Examples of these files for a SA_MOVE table that was added to an existing
publication:
MSmerge_contents_SA_MOVE.bcp
MSmerge_contents_SA_MOVE_forall.bcp
MSmerge_rowtrack_SA_MOVE90.bcp
sysmergesubsetfilters_SA_MOVE.bcp
sysmergesubsetfilters_SA_MOVE90.bcp
Also some new bcps created were:
MSmerge_contents90_forall.bcp
MSmerge_genhistory90.bcp
MSmerge_rowtrack90.bcp
sysmergesubsetfilters90.bcp
The system wanted to apply these files before it would start synchronizing
data so they had to be delivered to the subscriber. It appears it was the
sysmergesubsetfilters_ files that it wanted to apply. These are all 0 in
size and we do not have filter on(at least not as far as I know...see the
addmergearticle code below).
New databases created this year that had all of the articles defined in the
publication before the initial snapshot was taken did not get these
additional files created, nor did the system want to try to send files to the
subscriber before syncrhonization could begin.
This is an example of how an article had been cretead under SQL Server 2000
when adding a new database, before an initial snapshot is run:
exec sp_addmergearticle @publication = N'Last', @article = N'SA_MOVE',
@source_owner = N'dbo', @source_object = N'SA_MOVE', @type = N'table',
@description = null, @column_tracking = N'true', @pre_creation_cmd = N'drop',
@creation_script = null, @schema_option = 0x000000003000EFF1,
@article_resolver = null, @subset_filterclause = null, @vertical_partition =
N'false', @destination_owner = N'dbo', @verify_resolver_signature = 0,
@allow_interactive_resolver = N'false', @fast_multicol_updateproc = N'true',
@check_permissions = 0
This is an example of how an article was added under SQL Server 2000 to an
existing publication that already had the initial snapshot run:
exec sp_addmergearticle @publication = N'Last', @article = N'SA_MOVE',
@source_owner = N'dbo', @source_object = N'SA_MOVE', @type = N'table',
@description = null, @column_tracking = N'true', @pre_creation_cmd = N'drop',
@creation_script = null, @schema_option = 0x000000000000EFF1,
@article_resolver = null, @subset_filterclause = null, @vertical_partition =
N'false', @destination_owner = N'dbo', @auto_identity_range = N'false',
@verify_resolver_signature = 0, @allow_interactive_resolver = N'false',
@fast_multicol_updateproc = N'true', @check_permissions = 0,
@force_invalidate_snapshot = 1
A few questions:
Does anyone have an idea why the system created these files are part of the
2005 upgrade?
What is the real purpose of the files with names such as _forall.bcp ?
Thanks for any help/info on this,
Doug
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 17, 2007
Hi,
We have a client that has a large (5Gb) database replicated to 13 subscribers, the publisher is Sql 2005, the subscribers are Sql Express. The publication has as few filtered articles too. I have found that after several months of continuous running Replication Monitor is taking a long time to report history on each subscriber.
Do people tend to rebuild the indexes on the system merge replication tables on production servers, or should the standard replication jobs take care of this?
Thanks for your help
Graham
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 2, 2007
Hi,I have an application (Asp.net + c#).There is a SQL table called 'Status' it is used to store pending and activated events.There is a field called 'Complete'.So when user register I want to add recored to 'Complete' field as 'Pending'But I cant understand how to do this. Plese help me
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 18, 2014
How to find the pending transactions to be applied on secondary in Always On? Can i get those details from dashboard?
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 31, 2007
I've uninstall my previous sql2000 developer edition with leave some dll file undeleted.
once I tried to reinstall the sqlserver, the installation setup stop the process with message: A previous installation created pending file operations on the installation machine.
you must restart the computer before running setup.
I fail in continueing setup although i've restart the pc.
What should i do to handle this?
Regards,
BHT
Hhh.... please someone help me...
I don't want to reinstall the O/S as previously i've done. headache and waisting my days.
Regards,
BHT
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 20, 2007
I just installed SP2. I wanted to install the AdventureWorksDW database as part of the Database Engine Tuning Advisor tutorial. It said my install was not finished and I had a "pending reboot requirement." I shut down, and 8 different updates ran. When I tried to install the AdventureWorksDW database again, I got the same message. I'll see if there are still more updates to run.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
I am setting up a combination of transactional and merge replicationon a very large database and do not want to apply the initial snapshotsince this would take to long. I am doing this with scripts that werepreviosly created when the database was not this big. I want to copythe publisher DB over to the Subscriber Server. Can I use theparameter @sync_type to 'none' when running the sp_addsubscription?Does anyone have any experience in doing this?Thanks in Advance for any help on this.Alan
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 28, 2006
Hello...
We have had Merge Replication working for the past few months (SQL 2005 to SQL Mobile) and suddenly today the replication URL that points to the SqlCESA30.DLL does not work. I have tried re-running the SQL Mobile virtual folder wizard a few times....resetting IIS and even a re-boot...and still the URL is not available.
Is there anything that might provide some clue as to why this has unexpectedly failed?
thanks for any help!
- will
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 30, 2015
i've change the database log file from E drive to Drive due to insufficient space.without attaching the log file i've shutdown the sytem. becz it's gone in hand mode.post resuming its showing recovery pending.i'm unable to get online db.
View 15 Replies
View Related
Mar 22, 2007
Hello,
I've been able to startup a transactional replication between 2 database for some tables that only have different table names. Now there are still some tables that not only have different names but also different column names, can this be done in the wizzard ??
Thx
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 27, 2015
i have a SQL 2008 R2 RTM production instance, in which we run dBCC CheckDB every weekend to check on the DB. This weekend this sql job returned the error:
DBCC RESULTS
--------------------
<DbccResults>
<Dbcc ID="0" Error="8928" Severity="16" State="1">Object ID 866531312, index ID 1, partition ID 72057602979266560
, alloc unit ID 72057603064397824 (type In-row data): Page (1:7650240) could not be processed. See other errors
for details.</Dbcc>
<Dbcc ID="1" Error="8939" Severity="16" State="98">Table error: Object ID 866531312, index ID 1, partition ID 720
57602979266560, alloc unit ID 72057603064397824 (type In-row data), page (1:7650240). Test (IS_OFF (BUF_IOERR, pB
UF->bstat)) failed. Values are 12716041 and -6.</Dbcc>
<Dbcc ID="2" Error="8990" Severity="10" State="1">CHECKDB found 0 allocation errors and 2 consistency errors in t
able 'tblDistpatch' (object ID 866531312).</Dbcc>
We tried to rebuild the indexes in the table: tblDistpatch...the non clustered indexes ran fine however the cluster index rebuilt returned an error:
Error: The statement has been terminated.
Msg 829, Level 21, State 1, Line 1
Database ID 3, Page (1:7650240) is marked RestorePending, which may indicate disk corruption. To recover from this state, perform a restore.in TEST environment we were able to reproduce this error by restoring latest backup.
we ran :
dbcc checktable (tblDistpatch ,REPAIR_ALLOW_DATA_LOSS )
then we ran dbcc checkdb and no errors where found.
my question comes with in your experience is this the best possible way to fix this table?only one table, but running this in production environment will required to put db in single user mode first.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jun 12, 2015
I have a DB shown as recovery pending when running the following:
SELECT Name, state_desc
FROM sys.databases;
The DB was created by someone outside of our team using the Full Recovery model & I can see that no transaction log backups have been taken for this, causing the log to growth to a large size.
The MDF is only 5,120kb but the TRN has grown to 10,773,120kb
When I checked the Server I could see the data area had run out of space so I have freed up some space for this so now have 2.5gb available as a short term solution.
The MDF & LDF files are still visible & when checking the SQL log the DB is being reported as having a Full Transaction Log.
Essentially I want to change the Recovery Model from Full to Simple, Reduce the size of the transaction log & bring the DB back online. Luckily this DB is only used by a handful of users but I still need to get it up & running asap.
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 10, 2007
An issue with the 'Status' column of the 'Subscription' tab in the Report Manager.
I created Data-driven Subscriptions for some of the reports, and I scheduled the reports using shared schedule. The scheduling is working fine and all the reports are getting generated daily.
The issue is with the status of the report subscriptions under subscription tab, it shows as PENDING even after the report is generated.
I restarted the ReportServer database, it didn't served my purpose. The status never changes .
When do the subscription status changes to PENDING?
What needs to be done to change the PENDING status?
Is this the bug with the Report Manager?
Appreciate your timely help. TIA
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 15, 2004
I have a SQL2000 enterprise edition with sp3 clustered.
I am creating backup jobs via t-sql for around 680 databases. From MMC sqlAgent jobs, found all jobs (every DB has 7 jobs(M-Sun) are created. But some of (around 20% of the 680*7= 4760 jobs) in the Next Run Date column with value of "(Date and Time are not available". It means these jobs might be skipped to run.
If I right click the job and choose "start", then the job Next Run Date will be the corrent datetime. But when I rerun the t-sql to recreate jobs for these 20%, I get the
[The maximum number of pending SQLServerAgent notifications has been exceeded. The notification will be ignored.]
Is there a way to around it?
thanks
-D
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 11, 2007
Recently we disabled the transactional replication on a prodution database(data size:300GB) , two weeks later we were aware of the transaction log of that db almost reached the limitation (70GB).I investigated the issues and found:
1. open transactions pending for distribution:
DBCC opentran('xxxx')
Replicated Transaction Information:
Oldest distributed LSN : (0:0:0)
Oldest non-distributed LSN : (323830:7083:1)
DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages, contact your system administrator.
2. exec sp_replcounters, got over 240,000 replicated_transactions, which caused the tran log extremely large.
The transactional replication has been disabled on this server, there are no publication, distribution DBs any longer, all replication-related agents are also gone, why did this still happen???
3. use sp_repldone manaully reset those 240,000 transactions to distributed, check opentran, it was fine for a while. The tran log file was freed up 99% after that.
4. check open transactions and run sp_replcounters today, found the over 60000 transactions again on the db.
Did anybody experience the same issue and knows how to fix this issue and stop this happening ?
Many Thanks,
Henry
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 10, 2007
Have an interesting situation.
I have a NeverFail cluster on which I loaded SQL Server 2005 and SP1.
All was great. Both nodes had no issues with the initial setup or the SP1 update.
When I forced a failover to the inactive node, MOST of the services like SSIS, Full-Text and SQL Browser came up like a champ.
BUT ... the SQL Server service and the SQL Agent did not come up (or shall I say not fully).
I am now looking at the SQL Server Configuration Manager and I see the following for the SQL Server service:
"Name" shows the RED block icon for the SQL Server
"State" shows "Change pending ..."
"Start Mode" is set to Manual
"Log on as" has my domain account listed
"Process ID" has the number 2956 (so it has started somewhat).
I then click open the SQL Service item and it shows that it is stopped.
I am given the option to START the service. When I try to start it, the meter bar comes up and moves slowly to the end and then an error returns of ...
"The request failed or the service did not respond in a timely manner. Consult the event log or other applicable errors logs for details"
If I look under windows Services in the Admin Tools section... I see the services for SSIS, FT and Browser listed and started BUT I see SQL Server says its "starting".
If I click open the service from here, once again it show "starting" and all of the option buttons to Stop-Start-Pause-Resume are grayed out and I am not able to use them.
I have looked in the Windows Event Logs for any events but none are present.
Now I know why the SQL Agent is not running, and of course that is due to is dependency on SQL Server being up and running.
First off WHAT does the "Change pending" message mean?
Then what other logs can I look at for some help or is there someone who has the answers to this dilemma.
Thanks and have a great evening
View 11 Replies
View Related
Mar 16, 2015
Any command through that can I delete/disable the DWORD value "Pendingfilerename operations" so that while I start the SQL Install work, it does not fail due to this and can write this as one of the precheck options.
View 0 Replies
View Related
May 7, 2015
I have setup Transnational replication with updatable subscription.
There were around 7000 rows update at subscriber from one query which was executed at subscriber side.
But this update has not taken place at publisher yet and so to other subscribers.
Is there any way i can monitor pending log or where is the issue?
I find so many ways to see pending logs or statistics for - "Publisher to Subscriber" but not for "subscriber to publisher"
What is the way to see subscriber to publisher pending and issues?
View 0 Replies
View Related
