we are trying to replicate a database from 1 server to another, but during the snapshot, the process will fail with the following error.
The process could not bulk copy out of table '[dbo].[syncobj_0x4645324137444535]'.
i located this table....or actually 'View'....and im trying to determine whether this view is actually needed or not....
any help would be greatly appreciated
Hi!
I was just wondering - is it me or my mind playing tricks.
Does replication ever replicate your triggers, views, procedures, etc.? Cause, it didn't on my end.
MJT
I have a three server peer-to-peer replication setup that includes articles for tables and views. As I understand the BOL, scheme changes -- which I take to mean changes, amont other things, changes in the design of a table or view -- should automatically replicate to the other servers in the topology. Here are my quesitons:
When including a view as part of the publication, what is it, exactly, that is getting replicated? If all the tables supporting a given view are being replicated, and the view exists on all three boxes, whatelse, besides the view schema (and changes thereto) is being replicated?
Secondly, if in fact schema changes are replicated, why can't I modify a view that is part of a publication? When I try to make a change to such a view, I get a server timeout message, every single time. When I remove the view from the publication, I can make the modification with no trouble. What does replicating schema changes mean if I can't make changes to the schema?
Thanks for any enlightenment on this.
Randy
Hi,
I read that views can't be published with SQL Server 2005 replication. Is this planned for the future? If not what alternatives are there for this?
Simple collecting the data needed in a new table ain't a solution for us (memory consuming). And joining the data on the PPC ain't a good solution either (memory and time consuming). We only want to pull the data.
Greets,
Ivo Klerkx
Hi Folks Is there an easy way around this ? One Way Transactional Rep Subscriber needs SCHEMABINDING on the majority of their Views (require View Indexes) which read from Replicated Tables. Main table has 4 Million Rows ReInitialize Subscription Errors with Cannot Drop Table because it is being referenced By Object ..... [schemaBound View] GW
View 6 Replies View RelatedHello,
I setup the transactional replication to replicate remote database that has 50 tables.
Two of the tables with huge columns.
I splitted the columns by creating several views before running the initial snapshot.
Questions:
1. Can the database replication copy the views.?
2. Where the view will be stored at the subscriber database?
Thank you.
Edwin
Last Night I had a Dream
And it involved my favourite Design Technique - Simplicity
So to achieve Simple Replication across geographically disparate Servers we could use:-
300 plus SQL2000 Servers enabling 1000 Concurrent Active Clients (10% actual light Activity)
WAN = National Private Secured (ping 300ms max) (128kbps leased line Min)
One Interface Server constantly Running A Simple Dynamically Built Partitioned View (removing down servers)
One Stored Proc (or more) that Synchronizes the DPV Updateable Partitioned View with
Interface Mirror Table DeNormalized Holding a Physical Copy of each of the Subscribers/Publishers/Client Sql Servers Data
The Question is:-
Was my Dream a Nightmare OR A Dream Come True ?
I Know it's down to the Network Quality to a great degree but (That's the suck it and see part of the question)
but as a form of replication it seems a very simple platform that could possibly tackle our friend
The DCP (Data Consistency Problem) with Client Update DateTime Column & frequent activation (30 Secs).
Has anyone had much experience with this type of Scaling out over a WAN ?
Is it worth a Try in the Real World ?
GW
All of a sudden none of our merge replications are working. In fact you can't even insert, update or delete and data from the tables in the merge publication. When trying that, we get an error stating:
Msg 550, Level 16, State 1, Procedure MSmerge_ins_E3F43EF8B259476099BBB194A2E1708C, Line 42
The attempted insert or update failed because the target view either specifies WITH CHECK OPTION or spans a view that specifies WITH CHECK OPTION and one or more rows resulting from the operation did not qualify under the CHECK OPTION constraint.
The statement has been terminated.
Currently, the only solution I've found is to delete the publication and recreate it. I'm trying to figure out why this happened. It happened on a development server that to my knowledge, hasn't been changed in a week or so outside of changing the server's IP address. Would that cause such an error to occur?
-mike
We have merge replication running with anamous subscribers
We have generested lots of views tables and stored procedures like
sp_ins_C435D35DDEC04FE2517CCD52A9024EC4
ctsv_07BA7383A12B4654B4D3A69B3053B227
aonflict_DH_tblReplicationRegion
How do we get rud of these I am concerned it will fill up the publisher database
Can any one advise
Hi!
There is a view in our replicated SQL-2000 database, that returns all user tables and views with replication state (0 if not included into publication, 1 if included):
Code Snippet
CREATE VIEW [dbo].[ViewREPL_PublishedObjects]
AS
SELECT TOP 100 PERCENT
CASE [xtype]
WHEN 'U' THEN 'Table'
WHEN 'V' THEN 'View'
ELSE NULL END AS [Object Type],
[name] AS [Object Name],
CASE WHEN [replinfo] = 0
THEN 0 ELSE 1
END AS [Replicated]
FROM [sysobjects]
WHERE
[xtype] in ('U', 'V')
AND [status] > 0
ORDER BY
(CASE [xtype]
WHEN 'U' THEN 1
WHEN 'V' THEN 2
ELSE 10
END),
[name]
Now we need to upgrade our database to SQL-2005, but [sysobjects] table have been changed, so neither Replicated state could be determined according on [replinfo] column value, nor User/System object according on [status].
So, I need a view with same functionality, that will work under SQL-2005 and 2008.
Please, help!
Fellow database developers,I would like to draw on your experience with views. I have a databasethat includes many views. Sometimes, views contains other views, andthose views in turn may contain views. In fact, I have some views inmy database that are a product of nested views of up to 6 levels deep!The reason we did this was.1. Object-oriented in nature. Makes it easy to work with them.2. Changing an underlying view (adding new fields, removing etc),automatically the higher up views inherit this new information. Thismake maintenance very easy.3. These nested views are only ever used for the reporting side of ourapplication, not for the day-to-day database use by the application.We use Crystal Reports and Crystal is smart enough (can't believe Ijust said that about Crystal) to only pull back the fields that arebeing accessed by the report. In other words, Crystal will issue aSelect field1, field2, field3 from ReportingView Where .... eventhough "ReportingView" contains a long list of fields.Problems I can see.1. Parent views generally use "Select * From childview". This meansthat we have to execute a "sp_refreshview" command against all viewswhenever child views are altered.2. Parent views return a lot of information that isn't necessarilyused.3. Makes it harder to track down exactly where the information iscoming from. You have to drill right through to the child view to seethe raw table joins etc.Does anyone have any comments on this database design? I would love tohear your opinions and tales from the trenches.Best regards,Rod.
View 15 Replies View RelatedI'm getting this, after upgrading from 2000 to 2005.Replication-Replication Distribution Subsystem: agent (null) failed.The subscription to publication '(null)' has expired or does notexist.The only suggestions I've seen are to dump all subscriptions. Sincewe have several dozen publications to several servers, is there adecent way to script it all out, if that's the only suggestion?Thanks in advance.
View 3 Replies View RelatedHello,I'm getting the following error message when I try add a row using aStored Procedure."The identity range managed by replication is full and must be updatedby a replication agent".I read up on the subject and have tried the following solutionsaccording to MSDN without any luck.(http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/304706 )sp_adjustpublisheridentityrange (http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa239401(SQL.80).aspx ) has no effectFor Testing:I've reloaded everything from scratch, created the pulications from byrunning the sql scripts generated,created replication snapshots andstarted the agents.I've checked the current Identity values in the Agent Table:DBCC CHECKIDENT ('Agent', NORESEED)Checking identity information: current identity value '18606', currentcolumn value '18606'.I check the Table to make sure there will be no conflicts with theprimary key:SELECT AgentID FROM Agent ORDER BY AgentID DESC18603 is the largest AgentID in the table.Using the Table Article Properties in the Publications PropertiesDialog, I can see values of:Range Size at Publisher: 100,000Range Size at Subscribers: 100New range @ percentage: 80In my mind this means that the Publisher will assign a new range whenthe Current Indentity value goes over 80,000?The Identity range for this table cannot be exhausted! I'm not surewhat to try next.Please! any insight will be of great help!Regards,Bm
View 1 Replies View RelatedDear Team,
Can any body tell in which table the stored procedure error
details are stored.
When any stored procedure is compiled the
compilation errors/results are stored in which table.
i.e equivalent to user_errors as in Oracle.
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Regards,
Sridhar
I have an indexed view with a clustered index on my database........when I try to run and update statement agaisnt the table that is referenced in the view, I get one of the following errors:
Server: Msg 3624, Level 20, State 1, Line 1
Location: q:SPHINXNTDBMSstorengdrsinclude
ecord.inl:1447
Expression: m_SizeRec > 0 && m_SizeRec <= MAXDATAROW
SPID: 52
Process ID: 414
Connection Broken
Server: Msg 3624, Level 20, State 1, Line 1
Location: recbase.cpp:1371
Expression: m_nVars > 0
SPID: 52
Process ID: 414
Connection Broken
any ideas?
I would like to do this for materialized view
insert value '00466045730060107' through View c. it will insert into table a.
But i got this error when i try to insert into view "C"
Msg 4436, Level 16, State 12, Line 3
UNION ALL view 'X.dbo.c' is not updatable because a partitioning column was not found.
insert into c
values('00466045730060107')
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CREATE TABLE a
(
chara char(17)
CONSTRAINT PKA PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
CHECK (right(inta,6) between '060101' and '060131' )
)
CREATE TABLE b
(
chara char(17)
CONSTRAINT PKb PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
CHECK (right(inta,6) between '060201' and '060228' )
)
create view c
as(
select inta from a
union all
select inta from b
)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I've just installed SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition, upgraded from SQL Server 2000, and have encountered a problem in trying to query against the System Catalogs.
I've tried SELECT * FROM sys.objects in addition to SELECT suser_name( role_principal_id ) FROM sys.server_role_members. In both cases I receive the following error: Invalid object name 'sys.objects' or 'sys.server_role_members' in the second example.
I changed the properties of the registration for my local db instance to use SQL authentication in lieu of Windows authentication. I used the sa login account to see if that made a difference, no go.
Can someone *please* tell me what I'm doing wrong here?
I would also like to know if it's possible to run a query confirming the user account I'm logged in to the system as.
Thanks!
Hi all,
I executed the following code statements in my SQL Server Management Studio Express Edition program that is on Windows XP Pro PC-Microsoft Windows NT 4 LAN system:
-----SQLQuery.sql-------
USE testDb
GO
CREATE VIEW InventoryPublisherView AS
(SELECT * FROM Inventory AS I FULL OUTER JOIN Publisher AS P ON I.ID=P.InventoryID
SELECT * from InventoryPublisherView
SELECT Name, type, quantity, pubName from InventoryPublisherView
DELETE FROM InventoryPublisherView WHERE ID=1
ALTER VIEW InventoryPublisherView AS
(SELECT ID,name,type,quantity,pubName FROM Inventory AS I FULL OUTER JOIN Publisher AS P ON I.ID=P.InventoryID)
GO
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
I got the following error messages in Parse or Execute without Results:
Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Procedure InventoryPublisherView, Line 3
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'SELECT'.
Msg 111, Level 15, State 1, Procedure InventoryPublisherView, Line 6
'ALTER VIEW' must be the first statement in a query batch.
************************************************************
I have no ideas where in the SSMS-EE program I can look up for solving theses errors.
Please help tell me where I should look up and advise me what I should do to correct these problems.
Thanks in advance,
Scott Chang
I get the following error message:
SQL Exectution error,
Exectuted SQL statement: SELECT...
Source: .Net SqlClient data provider
Message: Timeout expired, timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the operation...
The view is operating on a table of 2mil records. The timeout occurs after 30 seconds, and none of the changes I make to the various timeout settings in the server or database seem to affect this.
When I execute the same sql statement in a query window it does complete, requiring about 40 seconds to execute.
How can I configure the view not to timeout when executing this view?
I'm trying to copy data over using a Transfer SQL Server Objects Task however I get problems trying to copy over views. I get the similar error (pre sp1) when using import/export wizard and copying over views. Now with SP1 the views just don't transfer. I'm transferring from SQL 2005 to SQL 2005. The error I get is:
Error: 0xC002F363 at Transfer Data (NEW), Transfer SQL Server Objects Task: Table "vw_XXXX" does not exist at the source. Task failed: Transfer Data (NEW)
I know the view exists at the source because:
A) I can select it in the Views List Collection within the Transfer SQL Server Objects Task
B) I'm using the view on the source
Somehow the views are not transferring. Anyone have any ideas?
Which is more efficient? One large view that joins >=10 tables, or a few smaller views that join only the tables needed for individual pages?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI get this error in my Agent after starten to synchronise.
I see the access mdb been created and then deleted and renamed to
name_old.mdb
Do you have some help?
Richard
Hello.
Newbie here. I've only been using SQL for about a year now and have some minor questions about sql objects that reference other objects.
We have some views which reference other views in the joins. I will call one the primary view and the one being referenced in the joins as the secondary view.
Recently we made changes to the secondary view.
After which the primary views which referenced it would not work because of this change and had to be 'refreshed' by using drop/create scripts which essentially just dropped it and recreated the exact same view. I do not recall the exact error message that was returned other than it seemed to suggest that it could no longer see the secondary view since it had been changed. Nothing in the primary view was changed in any way, just the secondary.
Some here where I work have suggested off hand that this was a recompile of the primary view because the contents of the secondary changed.
My questions are:
1. Exactly why did this happen and is there a proper name for it when it does?
2. The same problem does not seem to occur when we have stored procedures referencing views in the joins which had just been changed. Why is that?
Thanks for any help on the matter. I greatly appreciate it.
Hello,
to make a report easier I'm developing it using a view of joined views of joined views.
Is there any significant performance penalty as opposed to just having one big select?
Cheers.
When creating a replication publisher in the live server enviroment, the repicaltion displays an error saying
Could not obatin information about Windows NT group/user '........', error code 0x6e. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 15404)
When looking at the replication server, the error report says that the user is a System administrator on the Live Server but they do not exist on the replication server.
Why would this cause an error?
I appreciate your answer
Thanks
JC
Hello There,I'm trying to create a view that has calculations dependent oncalculations, where the problem resides is that each time I make acalculation I must create an intermediate view so I can reference aprevious calculation.for example lets say I have my_table that has columns a & b. now I wanta view that has a & b, c = a + b, and d = c + 1.this is grossly simplified, the calculations I actually use are fairlycomplex and copying / pasting them is out of the question.so what I have is my_view_a which makes column c, and my my_view_finalwhich makes column d (however, in my real application I have 5 of theseviews, a/b/c/d/e/)is there anyway I can consolidate all these views into one? I wasthinking of using a stored procedure with temp tables or somethingalong those lines.I just which I can use the aliases that I create for c in d in onestep.any insight would be greatly appreciated.
View 5 Replies View RelatedHas anyone seen this error on the publisher when setting up replication?
"Distributor must be running in Per Seat (Named User) licensing mode to use this replication feature."
I am trying to replicate from Sql Server 7 to Oracle.
i am getting error in replication minitor distributor must be running in per seat (named user) licensing mode .
So it is not able to replicate data.
has any one came across this type of error
thanks
from nirmal.
Hi, we had an issue with our data warehouse where we get the following error.
exec dbo.sp_table_validation @table = 'tabelname', @expected_rowcount = 1214384, @rowcount_only = 1, @full_or_fast = 2, @shutdown_agent = 0, @owner = 'dbo'
General network error. Check your network documentation.
Communication link failure
We found that this procedure was causing blocking on the DB server which killed replication. Does anyone know how this procedure is called or what calls it? I haven’t found any information on it except what BOL has.
Thanks for your time.
Hi,
I have created replication between 2 servers. Publication and distribution servers are the same. The distribution tasks finishes with the following error :
08001 [[Microsoft] [ODBC SQL Server Driver] [DBNMPNTW] ConnectionOpen (CreateFile())
Can anyone describe what is wrong here?
Thank you in advance.
Ali Malekshahi
Hi guys,
I have tried to install replication.The publication/distribution server has properly installed but the subscriber server side i am getting two error messages from the menu of SQL enterprises manager remote servers... topic
Error 229 : [SQL SERVER] EXECUTE permision denied on object sp_addserver,database, owner dbo
Error 229 : [SQL SERVER] EXECUTE permission denied on object sp_msupdate_subscriber_info,database distribution,owner dbo
what will do ? how to troubleshot the error msg 229.how will trap the error msg. in help,and i have checked the client side topolozy its properly connected but the server side only having the problem. If any one know about this could you help me...
Thanks in advance
Nellai
I have a database thats got sql as the engine and access 2000 for the client side.Now my problem is every time I edit a record this "Write Conflict" comes up. I did some investigating and I found out its due to a REPLICATIONCONFLICT ERROR.
Can anyone help me pls
Hi,
I get the following error when I select Replication --> Configure Publisher....
from EM
"the passed ordinal is out of range of the specified collection"
didnt find any article on KB