Hello:
If I would like to do Transactional Replication - do I set the Primary Key in the Table to
Identity = 'No'
Identity = 'Yes' or
Identity = 'Yes (Not for Replication)'
Thanks,
Bianca
How can I replicate a table when it has NO primary key? It will not show in the Articles in Publication window in Edit Publications....
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi,
Just a continuation to my earlier queries on replication.
I have a db which I want to replicate - it do not have pk?
I do not want to create pk on existing columns - so I thought of creating one more column in all the tables and make them pk .
Any one has any idea if this will work fine or may give any problem which I should be prepare for.
Any thought appreciated -
pvd
Hi ,
Plz help me.
The scenario is as follows
I have a db on sql server 2005.I have replicated the db on sql server 2000.All the data counts seems to be correct.But the online websites are not able to execute queries generating error(Microsoft OLE DB Provider for sql server error '80040e21'.Multiple step OLE DB operation generated errors.Check each OLE DB status value,if available.No work was done.)Same web aspcode is working for other db (which were replicated from sql server 2000).
Also one more thing that was observed is as follows:
1)Prmary key was replicated for some of the tables.When primary keys were removed manually report executed fine.
Thanks in advance
Satish
Hi There
View 11 Replies View RelatedHello!
I got a problem with merge replication. I got a central sql server 2005 database on which i got a publication. Also there are 2 sql servers CE which are subscribers to that publication. I need to add some records on both mobile servers indepently but i'm using primary key as a user id in one table.
So when i add a user on one PDA i use next available number in column ID. In the same time I add a user on other PDA with the same ID, because I don't know that there is such user with the same ID.
Ok then I do synchronization. First PDA synchronizes with server but second tells me that there is a record with the same PK. And my question is. Can these be resolved writing a custom resolver or maybe you know others resolutions, because I think that is a typicall problem but couldn't find any solution other than using ie. HOST_NAME() function.
Thanks for help!
MZ
I have a Merge Replication Problem and I'm not sure how to proceed.
Given the following:
Multiple clients have merge subscriptions to a central Server's DB.
DB contains a table tblUser
tblUser has a Varchar field; UserLoginName, which is Primary Key.
It also has an integer field, UserValue
The replication is configured to resolve to the greater integer value.
Client 1 creates a new User
INSERT tblUser
(UserLoginName, UserValue)
VALUES('Fred',1)
At the same time Client 2 does the same thing, but with a larger value
INSERT tblUSer
(UserLoginName, UserValue)
VALUES('Fred', 2)
One of the inserts will get to the Central Server first.
The other will form a conflict.
A row insert at 'Client2.dbUsers' could not be propagated to 'CentralServer.dbUsers'.
This failure can be caused by a constraint violation.
Violation of PRIMARY KEY constraint 'PK_tblUser_1'. Cannot insert duplicate key in object 'dbo.tblUser'.
So now I have two different value fields and a conflict that cannot be resolved.
Is this fixable?
Do I need to make changes at athe Architechture level?
I have a publication that has been working great for over eight months. I have on occassion had to stop publishing and stop subscribing in normal operation without problems.
Yesterday, I ran into a problem that I am not sure how to solve.
I keep getting a distribution task failure "Violation of Primary Key constraint 'aaaashipm_pk'. Attempt to insert duplicate key in object shipm failed while bulk copying into shipm
Anyone run across this or have any suggestions -- do I have a transaction log problem, distribution data base/log problem. I have checked the identity column to make sure its not out of sync, run a check on the table to make sure its not corrupted. I have a couple of other things I am trying but was curious if anyone else had come across this?
Will let you know if I find a solution but it doesn't look good.
Hello I currently have a merge replication set up with 4 subscribers. A primary field for one of my tables is set to a integer indetity.
What Ive noticed is that depending on which database I enter data into, the indentity field (primary key) is set within a certain range I.e
On Server 1 - Values start from 1 then 2,3,4 etc etc
Server 2 - 24001, 24002, 24003 etc etc
Server 3 - 46001, 46002, 46003 etc etc
Server 4 - 68001, 68002, 68003
My question is what happens when these ranges eventually conflict? Do they automatically gain a different range such as 142 001, 142 002 etc etc?
Ive tried looking in SQL Help, and a quick search here, Im just after some confirmation before I implement this to my app.
cheers
Hi, everyone,
I have problems to setup peer-to-peer replication. After I setup, I have an error message as below.
Violation of PRIMARY KEY constraint 'XPKSYS_SRTY_ADT'. Cannot insert duplicate key in object 'dbo.SYS_SRTY_ADT'. (Source: MSSQLServer, Error number: 2627)
Event ID 14151 in vent viewer.
Does anyone have a solution to resolve the problem?
Thanks a lot.
Hi All
I am a newbie to replication. I just want to know Is there any way to publish tables (articles) without primary keys in transactional replication.
Early Thanks,
Salman Shehbaz.
Hi there,
We're going to use replication on our database. There are tables without any primary key.
Is a primary key necessary for replication?
I have also antoher question: We want to replicate the whole OLTP database (size 30 GB).
Is snapshot replication a suitable mechanisme for this? I thougt snapshot replication overwrites all of the data, not only changed data. Or should we use another replication method?
Thanks in advance,
Patrick de Jong
I am trying to drop a primary key on column LID and then create a clustered index on a new identity column ID and then add the primary key back on the LID. I am not able to do so due the table being in replication. here is the error:
Cannot alter the table '' because it is being published for replication.
How do I get past the error and create the Clustered Index on ID column in both publisher and subscriber?
Hi,
I have set up a publisher using transactional replication. ( all seems ok). The initial snapshot has been generated.
The replication share on the distributor has all the generated DDL in it.
I add a subscriber. The tables are generated up to tblCountry then I get an incorrect syntax near ')' error
The Replication Monitor shows the following code as the cause. ( bold indicates incorrect sql)
Is this a bug in Replication (as this is an autogenerated sp)or have I configured something incorrectly?
The ddl for the table index is as follows ( from the replication folder)
/----
CREATE TABLE [APP].[tblCountry](
[CountryId] AS ([ISO 3166-1 NUMERIC-3]) PERSISTED NOT NULL,
[CountryCode] AS ([ISO 3166-1 ALPHA-2]) PERSISTED NOT NULL,
[CountryName] [varchar](80) COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS NOT NULL,
[ISO 3166-1 ALPHA-2] [char](2) COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS NOT NULL,
[ISO 3166-1 ALPHA-3] [char](3) COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS NOT NULL,
[ISO 3166-1 NUMERIC-3] [int] NOT NULL
)
GO
---/
/------ Keys ddl (.dx)
ALTER TABLE [APP].[tblCountry] ADD CONSTRAINT [PK_TBLCOUNTRY] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED ([CountryId])
go
ALTER TABLE [APP].[tblCountry] ADD CONSTRAINT [UQ_TBLCOUNTRY_ALPHA2] UNIQUE NONCLUSTERED ([ISO 3166-1 ALPHA-2])
go
ALTER TABLE [APP].[tblCountry] ADD CONSTRAINT [UQ_TBLCOUNTRY_ALPHA3] UNIQUE NONCLUSTERED ([ISO 3166-1 ALPHA-3])
go
ALTER TABLE [APP].[tblCountry] ADD CONSTRAINT [UQ_TBLCOUNTRY_COUNTRYNAME] UNIQUE NONCLUSTERED ([CountryName])
go
--------/
/------------
Command attempted:
create procedure "sp_MSins_APPtblCountry_msrepl_ccs"
@c1 int,@c2 varchar(80),@c3 char(2),@c4 char(3),@c5 int
as
begin
if exists ( select * from "APP"."tblCountry"
where
)
begin
update "APP"."tblCountry" set
"CountryName" = @c2
,"ISO 3166-1 ALPHA-2" = @c3
,"ISO 3166-1 ALPHA-3" = @c4
,"ISO 3166-1 NUMERIC-3" = @c5
where
end
else
begin
insert into "APP"."tblCountry"(
"CountryName"
,"ISO 3166-1 ALPHA-2"
,"ISO 3166-1 ALPHA-3"
,"ISO 3166-1 NUMERIC-3"
)
values (
@c2
,@c3
,@c4
(Transaction sequence number: 0x00000016000004F2014500000000, Command ID: 213)
------------/
Uma writes "Hi Dear,
I have A Table , Which Primary key consists of 6 columns.
total Number of Columns in the table are 16. Now i Want to Convert my Composite Primary key into simple primary key.there are already 2200 records in the table and no referential integrity (foriegn key ) exist.
may i convert Composite Primary key into simple primary key in thr table like this.
Thanks,
Uma"
Hi all,
Can anyone suggest me on Adding primary key to a table which has already a primary key.
Thanks,
Jeyam
Hi,
I have recently been looking at a database and wondered if anyone can tell me what the advantages are supporting a unique collumn, which can essentially be seen as the primary key, with an identity seed integer primary key.
For example:
id [unique integer auto incremented primary key - not null],
ClientCode [unique index varchar - not null],
name [varchar null],
surname [varchar null]
isn't it just better to use ClientCode as the primary key straight of because when one references the above table, it can be done easier with the ClientCode since you dont have to do a lookup on the ClientCode everytime.
Regards
Mike
We have a table, which has one clustered index and one non clustered index(primary key). I want to drop the existing clustered index and make the primary key as clustered. Is there any easy way to do that. Will Drop_Existing support on this matter?
View 2 Replies View RelatedHi all
I have the following table
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[property_instance] (
[property_instance_id] [int] IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL ,
[application_id] [int] NOT NULL ,
[owner_id] [nvarchar] (100) NOT NULL ,
[property_id] [int] NOT NULL ,
[owner_type_id] [int] NOT NULL ,
[property_value] [ntext] NOT NULL ,
[date_created] [datetime] NOT NULL ,
[date_modified] [datetime] NULL
)
I have created an 'artificial' primary key, property_instance_id. The 'true' primary key is application_id, owner_id, property_id and owner_type_id
In this specific instance
- property_instance_id will never be a foreign key into another table
- queries will generally use application_id, owner_id, property_id and owner_type_id in the WHERE clause when searching for a particular row
- Once inserted, none of the application_id, owner_id, property_id or owner_type_id columns will ever be modified
I generally like to create artificial primary keys whenever the primary key would otherwise consist of more than 2 columns.
What do people think the advantages and disadvantages of each technique are? Do you recommend I go with the existing model, or should I remove the artificial primary key column and just go with a 4 column primary key for this table?
Thanks Matt
I'm getting this, after upgrading from 2000 to 2005.Replication-Replication Distribution Subsystem: agent (null) failed.The subscription to publication '(null)' has expired or does notexist.The only suggestions I've seen are to dump all subscriptions. Sincewe have several dozen publications to several servers, is there adecent way to script it all out, if that's the only suggestion?Thanks in advance.
View 3 Replies View RelatedHi,I have transactional replication set up on on of our MS SQL 2000 (SP4)Std Edition database serverBecause of an unfortunate scenario, I had to restore one of thepublication databases. I scripted the replication module and droppedthe publication first. Then did a full restore.When I try to set up the replication thru the script, it created thepublication with the following error messageServer: Msg 2714, Level 16, State 5, Procedure SYNC_FCR ToGPRPTS_GL00100, Line 1There is already an object named 'SYNC_FCR To GPRPTS_GL00100' in thedatabase.It seems the previous replication has set up these system viewsSYNC_FCR To GPRPTS_GL00100. And I have tried dropping the replicationmodule again to see if it drops the views but it didn't.The replication fails with some wired error & complains about thisviews when I try to run the synch..I even tried running the sp_removedbreplication to drop thereplication module, but the views do not seem to disappear.My question is how do I remove these system views or how do I make thereplication work without using these views or create new views.. Whyis this creating those system views in the first place?I would appreciate if anyone can help me fix this issue. Please feelfree to let me know if any additional information or scripts needed.Thanks in advance..Regards,Aravin Rajendra.
View 2 Replies View RelatedHi,
In my production box is running on SQL7.0 with Merge replication and i want add one more table and i want add one more column existing replication table. Any body guide me how to add .This is very urgent
Regards
Don
Hello,
I have this problem on a Production database.
DBCC OPENTRAN shows "REPLICATION" on a server that is not configured for replication. The transaction log is almost as large as the database (40GB) with a Simple recovery model. I would like to find out how the log can be truncated in such a situation.
Thank you.
Hello,I'm getting the following error message when I try add a row using aStored Procedure."The identity range managed by replication is full and must be updatedby a replication agent".I read up on the subject and have tried the following solutionsaccording to MSDN without any luck.(http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/304706 )sp_adjustpublisheridentityrange (http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa239401(SQL.80).aspx ) has no effectFor Testing:I've reloaded everything from scratch, created the pulications from byrunning the sql scripts generated,created replication snapshots andstarted the agents.I've checked the current Identity values in the Agent Table:DBCC CHECKIDENT ('Agent', NORESEED)Checking identity information: current identity value '18606', currentcolumn value '18606'.I check the Table to make sure there will be no conflicts with theprimary key:SELECT AgentID FROM Agent ORDER BY AgentID DESC18603 is the largest AgentID in the table.Using the Table Article Properties in the Publications PropertiesDialog, I can see values of:Range Size at Publisher: 100,000Range Size at Subscribers: 100New range @ percentage: 80In my mind this means that the Publisher will assign a new range whenthe Current Indentity value goes over 80,000?The Identity range for this table cannot be exhausted! I'm not surewhat to try next.Please! any insight will be of great help!Regards,Bm
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhat is the main difference between snapshot and transactional and merge replication?
View 5 Replies View RelatedHi,
I have a VB.net app that access a SQL Express database. I have transactional repliaction set up on a SQL 2000 database (the publisher) and a pull subscription from the VB.net app. I use RMO in the VB app to connect to the publisher. My problem is I am getting some strange behaviour as follows
- if I run the app and invoke the pull subscription it works fine. If I then close my app and go back in, I can access my data without any problem
- If I run the app and try to access data in my SQL Express database it works fine. I can then close the app, reopen it and run the pull subscription it works fine
however.......
- if I run the app, invoke the pull subscription (which runs fine), and then try to access data in my local SQL Express database without firstly closing and reopening the app, I get a login error
- if I run the app, try to access data in my local SQL Express database (which works fine), and then try to run the pull subscription I get a "the process cannot acces the file as it is being used by another process" error. In this case I need to restart the SQL Express service to be able to run replication again.
I get exactly the same behaviour when I use the Windows Sync tool (with my app open at the same time) instead of my RMO code to replicate the data.
I am using standard ADO.Net 2 code to access my SQL Express data in the app and closing all connections etc
Any advice appreciated !
Thanks
Ronan
Hi all,
I have recently setup a transactional replication in MS SQL 2000. After setting up the replication the clients TempDB grew by almost 60GB. Now the client is Blaming me for the TempDB GROWTH and saying that its because of the replication being setup i tried to convince them but they are not satisfied yet. Can anybody please tell me does replication cause the tempdb to grow. If yes then how. can u suggest any good link for getting to know the internal working of SQL Server replication????
Thanks in advance
Jacx
Hi all,
I know that adding a column using ALTER TABLE to add a column automatically allows SQLSERVER 2005 to replicate the schema changes to the subscribers, however, I would like to add a new column to an existing article that is being used for merge replication, however, I don't want this column to be replicated. Re-initialising the subscriptions is not a option. Help would be appreciated.
I am using SQLSERVER 2005 (SP1).
I have been researching on the proper steps or sequence to follow to completely remove SQL Server 2012 Transactional Replication. I have read articles about using SSMS as well as using replication stored procedures and some procedures use SQLCMD or just regular TSQL executed in SSMS. I have also read articles where people said all you really need is connect to the Publisher instance, find the publication you want to remove and choose "Delete" and everything will be taken care of behind the scene. I have three SQL servers that participate in transactional replication. SQL-P (publisher),
SQL-D (distributor) and SQL-S (subscriber). Do I need to connect to the distributor instance and the subscriber instance when removing transactional replication or is it just really connecting to the publisher and click delete on the publication? I want everything gone including any metadata, systems tables, distributions db and any other replication objects created during the initial configuration.
Hello everyone,I am involved in a scenario where there is a huge (SQL Server 2005)production database containing tables that are updated multiple timesper second. End-user reports need to be generated against the data inthis database, and so the powers-that-be came to the conclusion that areporting database is necessary in order to offload report processingfrom production; of course, this means that data will have to bereplicated to the reporting database. However, we do not need all ofthe data in the production database, and perhaps a filtering criteriacan be established where only certain rows are replicated over to thereporting database as they're inserted (and possibly updated/deleted).The current though process is that the programmers designing thequeries/reports will know exactly what data they need from productionand be able to modify the replication criteria as needed. For example,programmer A might write a report where the data he needs can beexpressed in a simple replication criteria for table T where column X= "WOOD" and column Y = "MAHOGANY". Programmer B might come along amonth later and write a report whose relies on the same table T wherecolumn X = "METAL" and column Z in (12, 24, 36). Programmer B willhave to modify Programmer A's replication criteria in such a way as toaccomodate both reports, in this case something like "Copy rows fromtable T where (col X = "WOOD" and col Y = "MAHOGANY") or (col X ="METAL" and col Z in (12, 24, 36))". The example I gave is reallytrivial of course but is sufficient to give you an idea of what thecurrent thought-process is.I assume that this is a requirement that many of you may haveencountered in the past and I am wondering what solutions you wereable to come up with. Personally, I believe that the above method isprone to error (in this case the use of triggers to specifyreplication criteria) and I'd much rather use replication services tocopy tables in their entirety. However, this does not seem to be anoption in my case due to the sheer size of certain tables. Is thereanything out there that performs replication based on complexprogrammer defined criteria? Are triggers a viable alternative? Anyalternative out-of-the-box solutions?Any feedback would be appreciated.Regards!Anthony
View 11 Replies View RelatedI am working on bringing our disaster recovery site to be a live site. Currently we replicate to one of out servers (server B) with merge replication (from server A). Server A also does one way transactional replication form some table to several other servers including servers at the DR site.
This setup is not going to be fast enough for what we need so I am wondering if a table is receiving merge replication will the merge updates also replicate down the transaction path??
Example...
Server B update a row and merges to Server A. With this update them replicate (via transactional) to Server C??
thanks...
I have a wired situation..!I set up transactional replication on one of my development server (SQL2000 Dev Edition with sp4).It is running fine without any issues and all of a sudden, i noticed inmy repication monitor tab under Publisher where I usually see thepublication is empty now.I do see the snapshot agent, log reader and distribution agent under myagents inside the replication Monitor. But its usefull to see all 3agents in one window under publisher before. What happend? Is there anyway to get that inside that monitor? Has someone encountered thissitation before? Please advise....After that I tried to create a new set of replication on differentdatabase on the same server and i dont see those either underReplication Monitor - Publishers....All it says is (No Items)....I would appreciate any help to correct this issue... Thanks in advance..
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have setup transactional replication everything on one box. later(two or three weeks later), Replication monitor is show red X Under my publishers (publications is disconnected). this is SQL2005.
Everyone known how to fix this problem?
Thanks,
Frank