Replication:Unpublishing Not Unmarking Tables Correctly
Dec 30, 1998
A set of tables are published for replication, when I have to unpublish the tables in order to update their structures (i.e. drop and recreate), an error comes up to say that the tables are still marked for replication. I check sysarticles and no tables are listed and even if I completely take the database off of replication, still there are problems. I have looked at the stored procedures that publish/unpublish the selected articles and see that a bit in sysobjects.category is set/unset by a constant of 32. But when unpublishing, it is like this does not work. I have to go into the sysobjects table renumber the category number and try again to drop/recreate and still the problem occurs, so I have to do this once more and then it will work. VERY FRUSTRATING and TIME CONSUMING. I find it hard to believe that this is how to maintain this. Does anyone have any ideas? I unpublish the articles through the replication interface, so it should work.
HELP PLEASE!!
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jun 20, 2007
Hi Everyone!
I have a strange issue in my replicated databases.
I've a 5 merge subscribers replication schema. Our client discover a row that isn't matching with another database.
After some research it seam that the correct row is only at one database and all other database, have a the same row in a incoherent status.
Anyone have a idea on how this could happen?
I'm clue less right now
Thanks!
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 8, 2006
Hi:
If I want to unpublish an article thru Enterprise Manager, it does not allow me to uncheck it at publication properties. It only allows me to uncheck articles if I delete the subscription first. Does anybody know how tp do this in Enterprise Manager without deleting the subscription?
Thanks
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 16, 2007
I have a very weird problem.
I ran a SQL statement to get the data from two tables using join. These two tables have a column in the same name €śID€?.
SQL=€?select * from table1 a, table2 b where a.ID=b.ID€?
Set RS=DB.Execute(SQL)
The statement worked. But when I output the records in my ASP pages, I got an error:
ADODB.Recordset error '800a0cc1'
Item cannot be found in the collection corresponding to the requested name or ordinal€?
This is the line caused error:
<%= RS(€śa.ID€?) %>
It seemed that SQL Server recordset doesn€™t carry the table aliens. If I removed a. from ID the error was gone but it gave me the value of b.ID.
How to solve the problem? Thank you.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 22, 2007
I have the following query in an ExecuteSQL Task:
Insert Into Table2
Select * From Table1 Where Column1Val = '4'
As you can see, I don't need any parameters so I havent configured any. Also, there should not be any result set so I shouldnt need to configure a resultset parameter.
Why is the above query failing with
Problems with the query, "ResultSet" property not set correctly, parameters not set correctly, or connection not established correctly
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 12, 2006
Using SQL Server 2000 with sp4, I have setup a merge replication with a snapshot, currently if we do a schema change we have to:
-break replication,
-stop the subscription,
-make our modifications to the publisher,
-then create a backup of the database,
-push the backup to all of the subscribers,
-restore the database to the subscriber,
-reinitialize the subscription and push the subscription to the subscribers without pushing the contents of the initial snapshot
the reason why we do it this way is that the various servers are located hundreds of miles apart from the publisher and even with broadband connections, re-initializing the subscription always fails.
this is incredibly cumbersome and time consuming and i know there must be a better way to do this.
i need to add two tables to an existing database that is currently being replicated via merge replication, is there an easier way to make the schema changes and have them replicate to all the subscribers?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 6, 2001
I have some rogue replication conflict tables that I can't delete because they are system tables. They are names aonflict_<tablename> and bonflict_<tablename>. They are definitely not needed anymore. How can I delete them ? Does anyone know how to delete a system table ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 28, 2004
Hi all
i have one central site and 7 remote sites, there are one mssqlserver 2k in each sites.
i have to replicate 4 table in one DB(my DB have about 20 tables) in my 8 sites.
this 4 table have forignkey between themselves and other15 tables
i planed to transactional replication but i cant becuse forign keys occure erros
if needed i can send my DB digram to you.
can anyone help me? :confused:
Thanx
M.J.Danesh
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 1, 2007
Hi,
How frequently will the history tables get deleted in Merge Replication and Transactional Replication with updatable subscriptions??
When transactional replication with updatable subscriptions is running in the continuous mode, will the history tables get deleted frequently??
Parameters :
Version : SQL Server 2005 SP1
Mode : Continuous running mode
Subscription type : Pull (for transactional)
Regards,
Swapna.B.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 3, 2006
I have setup a transactional replication from oracle to MSSQL2005. One of the publication includes 26 articles but I found that there are only 24 articles replicated to the subscriber DB. I found that the repldata folder includes only files for 24 articles only. Besides, I double check the publication properties, totally, there 26 articles. Please advise. Thanks in advise.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
Hi, i restored a backup from a database thas has replication configured.When i restored it the system tables that the merge replication createsare restored too. I was investigating on internet and I found that i candelete it using this query:sp_configure 'allow updates', 1goreconfigure with overridegoDROP TABLE aonflict_SiacDataEEC_security_info...sp_configure 'allow updates', 0goreconfigure with overridegoDo somebody know if i use this queries to delete this tables i candamage the database or is correct to use it.Thanks a lot for your help.*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 18, 2006
Hello,
How to add the NOT FOR REPLICATION Option to Existing Tables( IDENTITY column,FOREIGN KEY constraints )- TSQL.
Thanks,
Kanna.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 6, 2001
Hi, eveyone..
I have a problem.
One of developer deleted Merge Replication Job.
However there is no doc for that replication.
What I want to know is like this:
which tables are in that replication?
Is there any system or user tables track down these replication as well as configuration in that replication?
Thanks in advance:-))
Jay
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 14, 2015
We need to replicate data from a live database to a reporting database nightly.
There is data which is only needed for the reporting function - namely the selection criteria for reports which are to be run nightly or monthly.
Is it possible to have extra tables in the target database, holding the selection criteria?
If not, we'll have the reports running heterogeneous queries between the target database and a separate database with the selection criteria in it.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 2, 2006
HiI tried posting this query in microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming but gotno response.I am new to replication but I am trying to setup up a transactionalreplication of tables from one database to another in MSSQL 2000 (SP2).My target tables have primary keys defined. Under publication properties Igo to the snapshot tab and for each table I clear the check box that says"Drop the existing table and re-create-it" and "clustered Indexes." On thispage the nothing is checked. for each table.Whenever the subscription is reinitialized it drops the primary keys on mytarget tablesand replaces them with a unique clustered index on the column that used tobethe Primary key.Is this normal? Is there anyway to stop it from doing this?I don't plan to send the snapshot more than once and let transactionalreplication take over for keeping my source and target in sync, but if Iever have to reinitialize the subscription, it would seem that I (orsomeone) willhave to take the a second step of manually dropping these clustered indexesand recreating the primary keys on the target table.Thanks in advance.---Dick Christoph---Dick ChristophJoin Bytes!612-724-9282
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Does anyone know if there's an SQL command i can run that will listthe tables in a database that have an identity column set to NOT FORREPLICATION?Many thanksDan Williams.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2015
There is an error in one of my merge publication. The error is,
The change for the row with article nickname 2336003 (test), rowguidcol {436456F0-F5AD-E411-80CF-5CF3FC1D2D76} could not be applied at the destination. Further information about the failure reason can be found in the conflict logging tables.
When i checked my tables I got following values in rowguid column
publication 436456F0-F5AD-E411-80CF-5CF3FC1D2D76
subscriptionD824D120-23AD-E411-80E3-00155D0E1001
conflict tables 689C6A61-5359-4BB5-BECD-B03F5F94D79A
View 0 Replies
View Related
Apr 1, 2015
I am using SQL 2012 SE and implementing transactional replication. I need to insert the rows from publisher database tables to new tables, drop the old tables and rename the new tables with the old table names.
For example:
Publisher database tables that are being replicated:
Table1
Table2
Table3
and I am going to create new tables in publisher database
Table1_new
Table2_new
Table3_new
Move data from
Table1--->Table1_new
Table2--->Table2_new
Table3--->Table3_new
Drop constraints from and then tables (does this require articles to be removed from replication?)
Table1
Table2
Table3
Rename
Table1_new to Table1
Table2_new to Table2
Table3_new to Table3
Does this require replication to set up from scratch or add the three articles only to replication? Is there a way this can be done without pausing or reinitializing replication or without removing articles and adding them back?
View 0 Replies
View Related
Jul 13, 2006
Hello all,
here is a stored procedure I have:
CREATE PROCEDURE spU_GUI_AppliqueConditionFinancementPourGuichet
(
@GuichetId int,
@Validateur nvarchar(40)
)
AS
CREATE TABLE #tReservations (ReservationId int)
IF (dbo.GetSiGuichetEnRegle(@GuichetId) = 0)
INSERT #tReservations
EXECUTE spU_GUI_AppliquePerteFinancement @GuichetID, @Validateur
ELSE
INSERT #tReservations
EXECUTE spU_GUI_AppliquePerteAgrement @GuichetID, @Validateur
SELECT GR.Id,
dbo.FormateNoms(GR.Name) AS Names
FROM #tReservations
LEFT JOIN AnotherTable GR ON GR.Id = AnotherTable.id
DROP TABLE #tReservations
GO
The creation is ok but when I look to the dependencies, I see that it depends on GetSiGuichetEnRegle only.
For me, it shall also depend on
AnotherTable
spU_GUI_AppliquePerteFinancement
spU_GUI_AppliquePerteAgrement
FormateNoms
Apparently the dependencies are not calculated correctly because I'm using a temporary table.
My problem is that I have updated this stored procedures (and the two other that I call) to add a new parameter. As a consequence, when I do a replication, this is failing saying that I have an extra parameter. I imagine that because my dependencies are not correct, the replication is not occuring in the correct order and so it's still using the old definition of the stored procedure.
Do you have any idea on how I can force the dependencies to be calculated correctly ?
Thanks
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 19, 2007
hi all,
Could we configure a merge replication such as replicate the master table and its all related tables (relation deep could be 1.)
We dont want to manually find master table relations and configure replication for the related tables.
please help for that configuration
kinds
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 16, 2007
Hi All
I am a newbie to replication. I just want to know Is there any way to publish tables (articles) without primary keys in transactional replication.
Early Thanks,
Salman Shehbaz.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 4, 2006
We have merge replication running with anamous subscribers
We have generested lots of views tables and stored procedures like
sp_ins_C435D35DDEC04FE2517CCD52A9024EC4
ctsv_07BA7383A12B4654B4D3A69B3053B227
aonflict_DH_tblReplicationRegion
How do we get rud of these I am concerned it will fill up the publisher database
Can any one advise
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 25, 2015
Regarding Snapshot replication....
If I have 200 tables on my source DB and 100 tables on my target DB... and I set up a publication w/ just 1 article to be published....
Will the invocation of the snapshot/apply affect any tables on my target other than the article I'm replicating?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 21, 2007
We have on demand snapshot replication set up between 2 servers. When the subscriber applies the snapshot, our stored procedures start executing very slowly. Updating statistics and rebuilding indexes does not resolve the problem, however; executing sp_recompile on the affected stored procedures does fix the problem. Is this a known issue with replication? Is there a better workaround than manually recompiling stored procedures after every snapshot?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 22, 2007
Hi!
There is a view in our replicated SQL-2000 database, that returns all user tables and views with replication state (0 if not included into publication, 1 if included):
Code Snippet
CREATE VIEW [dbo].[ViewREPL_PublishedObjects]
AS
SELECT TOP 100 PERCENT
CASE [xtype]
WHEN 'U' THEN 'Table'
WHEN 'V' THEN 'View'
ELSE NULL END AS [Object Type],
[name] AS [Object Name],
CASE WHEN [replinfo] = 0
THEN 0 ELSE 1
END AS [Replicated]
FROM [sysobjects]
WHERE
[xtype] in ('U', 'V')
AND [status] > 0
ORDER BY
(CASE [xtype]
WHEN 'U' THEN 1
WHEN 'V' THEN 2
ELSE 10
END),
[name]
Now we need to upgrade our database to SQL-2005, but [sysobjects] table have been changed, so neither Replicated state could be determined according on [replinfo] column value, nor User/System object according on [status].
So, I need a view with same functionality, that will work under SQL-2005 and 2008.
Please, help!
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 6, 2015
I have documentation in the form of extended properties for tables which are subscribers in a replication scheme. The documentation describes the tables in reference to their replication scheme. I don't want to apply them to the source and have them published.I can't apply the extended properties receiving the error, 'don't have permission' yet I am DB creator on all systems. The theory is that I can't modify the subscription. Which makes sense.Can I turn off the replication, apply the extended properties, then turn on replication without causing harm?
View 0 Replies
View Related
Nov 6, 2015
As per attachment, i have been created replications but in local subscription it is not populated any thing at the same time, Subscription database has been created but tables is not populated as per publication table.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 30, 2004
and (jobs.ApplicationsClosed > getdate() OR jobs.ApplicationsClosed = getdate())
The above statement does not pick jobs.ApplicationsClosed= 3/30/2004(that is today'sdate)
If I change 3/30/2004 to 3/31/2004 it picks it up. What is wrong with my syntax?
Thanks!
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 9, 2007
Hi guys,
I'm trying to use the bcp utility to transfer data from an SQL Server table (CUSTOMERS) to a text file (test.txt).
Here is what I have:
DECLARE @FileName varchar(50)
SET @FileName = 'C: est.txt'
EXEC bcp BAirwaysDB..CUSTOMERS out @FileName -S<servername> -T
only I keep getting the error:
Msg 102, Level 15, State 1, Line 4
Incorrect syntax near '.'.
and when running:
bcp BAirwaysDB..CUSTOMERS out C: est.txt -S<servername> -T
on the command line I get:
SQLState = 28000, NativeError = 18456
Error = [Microsoft][SQL Native Client][SQL Server]Login failed for user 'RIVERAMelanie'.
SQLState = 42000, NativeError = 4060
Error = [Microsoft][SQL Native Client][SQL Server]Cannot open database "BAirways" requested by the login. The login failed.
Can you see where I'm going wrong with this? Any feedback would be really appreciated.
Thank you
Butterfly82
View 7 Replies
View Related
Oct 12, 2007
Hi,
I have the following simple SP..
There is a field which I'm doing a sUM() on to get a total for a QtyRecieved from one of the tbls in the SP..
However, the QtyRecieved field is set to be a two decimal place numeric field.
The sp works fine without issues until on the of the qty received is not a round number.
If it's a number with a decimal in it (i.e 5.5) then this is show as a seperate result and not SUM'd with the others.
Any ideas why?
SELECT PDS_Login.Supplier_Products.ProductName, PDS_Login.Supplier_Products.ProductCode, dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.POID,
dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.PODetailsID, dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.Qty, dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.PricePerItem,
dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.PoDetailsStatus, dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.PoDateExpected, dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.PODateReceived,
PDS_Login.Supplier_Products.UOM, PDS_Login.Supplier_Products.Vatable, dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.ProductID,
dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.PODetailsStatusReason, SUM(dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details_Received.Qty) AS QtyReceived
FROM PDS_Login.Supplier_Products INNER JOIN
dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details ON PDS_Login.Supplier_Products.ProductID = dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.ProductID RIGHT OUTER JOIN
dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details_Received ON dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.PODetailsID = dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details_Received.PODetailsID
GROUP BY dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.PODetailsID, dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.Qty, PDS_Login.Supplier_Products.ProductName,
PDS_Login.Supplier_Products.ProductCode, dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.POID, dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.PricePerItem,
dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.PoDetailsStatus, dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.PoDateExpected, dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.PODateReceived,
PDS_Login.Supplier_Products.UOM, PDS_Login.Supplier_Products.Vatable, dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.ProductID,
dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.PODetailsStatusReason, dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details_Received.Qty
HAVING (dbo.Suppliers_POs_Details.POID = @POID)
View 10 Replies
View Related
Aug 31, 2006
This is a subset question of one of my other threads, the gist is while using forms authentication, I am trying to enter additional information into another table on the same db as the aspnet_membership tables. I think I need an <asp:SqlDataSource> to do this because it is about the only thing left I haven't tried to get this code to work so any help is appreciated. Environment: sql server 2000, windows server 2003, asp.net 2.0, vb, no GUI<ASP:SqlDataSource id="addedInfo" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:SqlServerConnection %>" InsertCommand="INSERT INTO addInfo(username,email,company,firstname,lastname,phone) VALUES (@username,@email,@company,@firstname,@lastname,@phone)" runat="server" />looking over some of my books and online it says in the connectionStrings that it is supposed to be the database name that goes next to the : but when I try that I get an error that it is looking for the name of the connection string, so I enter the name of the connection string (as above) and nothing happens, which is basically the ongoing event with this whole problem, the form fields (username, email, password) that go into the aspnet_membership tables just fine, I don't have any problems with those, it is getting the additional information into another table that has been stalling me the whole time.So does this sqldatasource look right? Any help is appreciated.
View 12 Replies
View Related
May 16, 2008
Hi everyone,
I'm having some problems importing a CSV to a db in SQL Server
Consider the following csv input
"1102","Spiderman, New York City",
"1103","Superman, Metropolis",
"1104","Batman, Gotham City",
When I select comma as delimiter, the columns will automatically
be offset since the location includes commas as well. How do I correctly
set the delimiter?
I tried using the following as delimiter → ","
but that'll strip the quotes which are required in this case.
Does anyone have an idea how to resolve this?
View 8 Replies
View Related
