Replication On Views

Mar 19, 2001

Hi!

I was just wondering - is it me or my mind playing tricks.

Does replication ever replicate your triggers, views, procedures, etc.? Cause, it didn't on my end.

MJT

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Replication Error Due To 'Views'

Apr 17, 2007

we are trying to replicate a database from 1 server to another, but during the snapshot, the process will fail with the following error.

The process could not bulk copy out of table '[dbo].[syncobj_0x4645324137444535]'.

i located this table....or actually 'View'....and im trying to determine whether this view is actually needed or not....

any help would be greatly appreciated

View 1 Replies View Related

Including Views In Replication

Jun 28, 2006

I have a three server peer-to-peer replication setup that includes articles for tables and views. As I understand the BOL, scheme changes -- which I take to mean changes, amont other things, changes in the design of a table or view -- should automatically replicate to the other servers in the topology. Here are my quesitons:

When including a view as part of the publication, what is it, exactly, that is getting replicated? If all the tables supporting a given view are being replicated, and the view exists on all three boxes, whatelse, besides the view schema (and changes thereto) is being replicated?

Secondly, if in fact schema changes are replicated, why can't I modify a view that is part of a publication? When I try to make a change to such a view, I get a server timeout message, every single time. When I remove the view from the publication, I can make the modification with no trouble. What does replicating schema changes mean if I can't make changes to the schema?

Thanks for any enlightenment on this.

Randy

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2005 Replication And Views

Feb 24, 2006

Hi,

I read that views can't be published with SQL Server 2005 replication. Is this planned for the future? If not what alternatives are there for this?

Simple collecting the data needed in a new table ain't a solution for us (memory consuming). And joining the data on the PPC ain't a good solution either (memory and time consuming). We only want to pull the data.

Greets,

Ivo Klerkx

View 3 Replies View Related

2005 Replication With SCHEMABINDING Subscriber Views

Dec 6, 2007

Hi Folks Is there an easy way around this ? One Way Transactional Rep Subscriber needs SCHEMABINDING on the majority of their Views (require View Indexes) which read from Replicated Tables. Main table has 4 Million Rows ReInitialize Subscription Errors with Cannot Drop Table because it is being referenced By Object ..... [schemaBound View] GW

View 6 Replies View Related

Transactional Replication Setup To Replicate Views

Mar 20, 2007

Hello,

I setup the transactional replication to replicate remote database that has 50 tables.

Two of the tables with huge columns.

I splitted the columns by creating several views before running the initial snapshot.

Questions:

1. Can the database replication copy the views.?

2. Where the view will be stored at the subscriber database?

Thank you.

Edwin

View 3 Replies View Related

Simple Distributed Partioned Views (DPV's) Replication && Sheep

May 18, 2006

Last Night I had a Dream

And it involved my favourite Design Technique - Simplicity

So to achieve Simple Replication across geographically disparate Servers we could use:-

300 plus SQL2000 Servers enabling 1000 Concurrent Active Clients (10% actual light Activity)
WAN = National Private Secured (ping 300ms max) (128kbps leased line Min)
One Interface Server constantly Running A Simple Dynamically Built Partitioned View (removing down servers)
One Stored Proc (or more) that Synchronizes the DPV Updateable Partitioned View with
Interface Mirror Table DeNormalized Holding a Physical Copy of each of the Subscribers/Publishers/Client Sql Servers Data


The Question is:-

Was my Dream a Nightmare OR A Dream Come True ?

I Know it's down to the Network Quality to a great degree but (That's the suck it and see part of the question)
but as a form of replication it seems a very simple platform that could possibly tackle our friend
The DCP (Data Consistency Problem) with Client Update DateTime Column & frequent activation (30 Secs).

Has anyone had much experience with this type of Scaling out over a WAN ?

Is it worth a Try in the Real World ?

GW

View 1 Replies View Related

Merge Replication Corruption (system Triggers And Views)

Sep 21, 2006

All of a sudden none of our merge replications are working. In fact you can't even insert, update or delete and data from the tables in the merge publication. When trying that, we get an error stating:

Msg 550, Level 16, State 1, Procedure MSmerge_ins_E3F43EF8B259476099BBB194A2E1708C, Line 42
The attempted insert or update failed because the target view either specifies WITH CHECK OPTION or spans a view that specifies WITH CHECK OPTION and one or more rows resulting from the operation did not qualify under the CHECK OPTION constraint.
The statement has been terminated.

Currently, the only solution I've found is to delete the publication and recreate it. I'm trying to figure out why this happened. It happened on a development server that to my knowledge, hasn't been changed in a week or so outside of changing the server's IP address. Would that cause such an error to occur?

-mike

View 5 Replies View Related

Merge Replication Conflict Tables Stored Proces And Views

May 4, 2006

We have merge replication running with anamous subscribers
We have generested lots of views tables and stored procedures like
sp_ins_C435D35DDEC04FE2517CCD52A9024EC4

ctsv_07BA7383A12B4654B4D3A69B3053B227
aonflict_DH_tblReplicationRegion

How do we get rud of these I am concerned it will fill up the publisher database
Can any one advise

View 1 Replies View Related

View Of All User Objects (Tables, Views) With Their Replication State NEEDED...

Jun 22, 2007

Hi!



There is a view in our replicated SQL-2000 database, that returns all user tables and views with replication state (0 if not included into publication, 1 if included):






Code Snippet

CREATE VIEW [dbo].[ViewREPL_PublishedObjects]

AS

SELECT TOP 100 PERCENT

CASE [xtype]

WHEN 'U' THEN 'Table'

WHEN 'V' THEN 'View'

ELSE NULL END AS [Object Type],

[name] AS [Object Name],

CASE WHEN [replinfo] = 0

THEN 0 ELSE 1

END AS [Replicated]

FROM [sysobjects]

WHERE

[xtype] in ('U', 'V')

AND [status] > 0

ORDER BY

(CASE [xtype]

WHEN 'U' THEN 1

WHEN 'V' THEN 2

ELSE 10

END),

[name]



Now we need to upgrade our database to SQL-2005, but [sysobjects] table have been changed, so neither Replicated state could be determined according on [replinfo] column value, nor User/System object according on [status].



So, I need a view with same functionality, that will work under SQL-2005 and 2008.



Please, help!

View 2 Replies View Related

Are Embedded Views (Views Within Views...) Evil And If So Why?

Apr 3, 2006

Fellow database developers,I would like to draw on your experience with views. I have a databasethat includes many views. Sometimes, views contains other views, andthose views in turn may contain views. In fact, I have some views inmy database that are a product of nested views of up to 6 levels deep!The reason we did this was.1. Object-oriented in nature. Makes it easy to work with them.2. Changing an underlying view (adding new fields, removing etc),automatically the higher up views inherit this new information. Thismake maintenance very easy.3. These nested views are only ever used for the reporting side of ourapplication, not for the day-to-day database use by the application.We use Crystal Reports and Crystal is smart enough (can't believe Ijust said that about Crystal) to only pull back the fields that arebeing accessed by the report. In other words, Crystal will issue aSelect field1, field2, field3 from ReportingView Where .... eventhough "ReportingView" contains a long list of fields.Problems I can see.1. Parent views generally use "Select * From childview". This meansthat we have to execute a "sp_refreshview" command against all viewswhenever child views are altered.2. Parent views return a lot of information that isn't necessarilyused.3. Makes it harder to track down exactly where the information iscoming from. You have to drill right through to the child view to seethe raw table joins etc.Does anyone have any comments on this database design? I would love tohear your opinions and tales from the trenches.Best regards,Rod.

View 15 Replies View Related

Large Views Vs Multiple Small Views

Sep 6, 2007

Which is more efficient? One large view that joins >=10 tables, or a few smaller views that join only the tables needed for individual pages?

View 1 Replies View Related

Recompiling Views That Reference Other Views

Jun 28, 2007

Hello.

Newbie here. I've only been using SQL for about a year now and have some minor questions about sql objects that reference other objects.



We have some views which reference other views in the joins. I will call one the primary view and the one being referenced in the joins as the secondary view.

Recently we made changes to the secondary view.

After which the primary views which referenced it would not work because of this change and had to be 'refreshed' by using drop/create scripts which essentially just dropped it and recreated the exact same view. I do not recall the exact error message that was returned other than it seemed to suggest that it could no longer see the secondary view since it had been changed. Nothing in the primary view was changed in any way, just the secondary.



Some here where I work have suggested off hand that this was a recompile of the primary view because the contents of the secondary changed.

My questions are:

1. Exactly why did this happen and is there a proper name for it when it does?

2. The same problem does not seem to occur when we have stored procedures referencing views in the joins which had just been changed. Why is that?



Thanks for any help on the matter. I greatly appreciate it.

View 3 Replies View Related

Quicky : Views Of Views Of Views

Feb 22, 2007

Hello,

to make a report easier I'm developing it using a view of joined views of joined views.

Is there any significant performance penalty as opposed to just having one big select?

Cheers.

View 1 Replies View Related

Views Dependent On Other Views

Mar 14, 2006

Hello There,I'm trying to create a view that has calculations dependent oncalculations, where the problem resides is that each time I make acalculation I must create an intermediate view so I can reference aprevious calculation.for example lets say I have my_table that has columns a & b. now I wanta view that has a & b, c = a + b, and d = c + 1.this is grossly simplified, the calculations I actually use are fairlycomplex and copying / pasting them is out of the question.so what I have is my_view_a which makes column c, and my my_view_finalwhich makes column d (however, in my real application I have 5 of theseviews, a/b/c/d/e/)is there anyway I can consolidate all these views into one? I wasthinking of using a stored procedure with temp tables or somethingalong those lines.I just which I can use the aliases that I create for c in d in onestep.any insight would be greatly appreciated.

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL 2005 Error: Replication-Replication Distribution Subsystem: Agent (null) Failed.

Jun 15, 2007

I'm getting this, after upgrading from 2000 to 2005.Replication-Replication Distribution Subsystem: agent (null) failed.The subscription to publication '(null)' has expired or does notexist.The only suggestions I've seen are to dump all subscriptions. Sincewe have several dozen publications to several servers, is there adecent way to script it all out, if that's the only suggestion?Thanks in advance.

View 3 Replies View Related

Replication Issues After A Database Restore - Unable To Drop Or Create Transactional Replication

Sep 13, 2007

Hi,I have transactional replication set up on on of our MS SQL 2000 (SP4)Std Edition database serverBecause of an unfortunate scenario, I had to restore one of thepublication databases. I scripted the replication module and droppedthe publication first. Then did a full restore.When I try to set up the replication thru the script, it created thepublication with the following error messageServer: Msg 2714, Level 16, State 5, Procedure SYNC_FCR ToGPRPTS_GL00100, Line 1There is already an object named 'SYNC_FCR To GPRPTS_GL00100' in thedatabase.It seems the previous replication has set up these system viewsSYNC_FCR To GPRPTS_GL00100. And I have tried dropping the replicationmodule again to see if it drops the views but it didn't.The replication fails with some wired error & complains about thisviews when I try to run the synch..I even tried running the sp_removedbreplication to drop thereplication module, but the views do not seem to disappear.My question is how do I remove these system views or how do I make thereplication work without using these views or create new views.. Whyis this creating those system views in the first place?I would appreciate if anyone can help me fix this issue. Please feelfree to let me know if any additional information or scripts needed.Thanks in advance..Regards,Aravin Rajendra.

View 2 Replies View Related

Adding New Table In Replication And Changing One Column Replication Database

Jan 17, 2002

Hi,

In my production box is running on SQL7.0 with Merge replication and i want add one more table and i want add one more column existing replication table. Any body guide me how to add .This is very urgent
Regards
Don

View 1 Replies View Related

DBCC OPENTRAN Shows REPLICATION On A Server That Is Not Configured For Replication

Aug 22, 2007

Hello,

I have this problem on a Production database.

DBCC OPENTRAN shows "REPLICATION" on a server that is not configured for replication. The transaction log is almost as large as the database (40GB) with a Simple recovery model. I would like to find out how the log can be truncated in such a situation.

Thank you.

View 4 Replies View Related

Identity Range Managed By Replication Is Full And Must Be Updated By A Replication Agent. Error Message Makes NO SENSE.

Mar 6, 2007

Hello,I'm getting the following error message when I try add a row using aStored Procedure."The identity range managed by replication is full and must be updatedby a replication agent".I read up on the subject and have tried the following solutionsaccording to MSDN without any luck.(http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/304706 )sp_adjustpublisheridentityrange (http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa239401(SQL.80).aspx ) has no effectFor Testing:I've reloaded everything from scratch, created the pulications from byrunning the sql scripts generated,created replication snapshots andstarted the agents.I've checked the current Identity values in the Agent Table:DBCC CHECKIDENT ('Agent', NORESEED)Checking identity information: current identity value '18606', currentcolumn value '18606'.I check the Table to make sure there will be no conflicts with theprimary key:SELECT AgentID FROM Agent ORDER BY AgentID DESC18603 is the largest AgentID in the table.Using the Table Article Properties in the Publications PropertiesDialog, I can see values of:Range Size at Publisher: 100,000Range Size at Subscribers: 100New range @ percentage: 80In my mind this means that the Publisher will assign a new range whenthe Current Indentity value goes over 80,000?The Identity range for this table cannot be exhausted! I'm not surewhat to try next.Please! any insight will be of great help!Regards,Bm

View 1 Replies View Related

Replication :: Difference Between Snapshot And Transaction And Merge Replication?

May 26, 2015

What is the main difference between snapshot and transactional and merge replication?

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL Express Replication And Problems Accessing Data After Replication

Jul 28, 2006

Hi,

I have a VB.net app that access a SQL Express database. I have transactional repliaction set up on a SQL 2000 database (the publisher) and a pull subscription from the VB.net app. I use RMO in the VB app to connect to the publisher. My problem is I am getting some strange behaviour as follows

- if I run the app and invoke the pull subscription it works fine. If I then close my app and go back in, I can access my data without any problem

- If I run the app and try to access data in my SQL Express database it works fine. I can then close the app, reopen it and run the pull subscription it works fine

however.......

- if I run the app, invoke the pull subscription (which runs fine), and then try to access data in my local SQL Express database without firstly closing and reopening the app, I get a login error

- if I run the app, try to access data in my local SQL Express database (which works fine), and then try to run the pull subscription I get a "the process cannot acces the file as it is being used by another process" error. In this case I need to restart the SQL Express service to be able to run replication again.

I get exactly the same behaviour when I use the Windows Sync tool (with my app open at the same time) instead of my RMO code to replicate the data.

I am using standard ADO.Net 2 code to access my SQL Express data in the app and closing all connections etc

Any advice appreciated !

Thanks
Ronan





View 2 Replies View Related

Does Replication Affect Tempdb GROWTH Replication

Jun 28, 2007

Hi all,

I have recently setup a transactional replication in MS SQL 2000. After setting up the replication the clients TempDB grew by almost 60GB. Now the client is Blaming me for the TempDB GROWTH and saying that its because of the replication being setup i tried to convince them but they are not satisfied yet. Can anybody please tell me does replication cause the tempdb to grow. If yes then how. can u suggest any good link for getting to know the internal working of SQL Server replication????



Thanks in advance

Jacx

View 3 Replies View Related

How Do We Add A New Column To A Merge Replication Article, But Specify It As Not For Replication?

Aug 30, 2007

Hi all,

I know that adding a column using ALTER TABLE to add a column automatically allows SQLSERVER 2005 to replicate the schema changes to the subscribers, however, I would like to add a new column to an existing article that is being used for merge replication, however, I don't want this column to be replicated. Re-initialising the subscriptions is not a option. Help would be appreciated.

I am using SQLSERVER 2005 (SP1).

View 3 Replies View Related

Replication :: Transactional Replication Removal Sequence

Sep 2, 2015

I have been researching on the proper steps or sequence to follow to completely remove SQL Server 2012 Transactional Replication.  I have read articles about using SSMS as well as using replication stored procedures and some procedures use SQLCMD or just regular TSQL executed in SSMS.  I have also read articles where people said all you really need is connect to the Publisher instance, find the publication you want to remove and choose "Delete" and everything will be taken care of behind the scene. I have three SQL servers that participate in transactional replication.  SQL-P (publisher), 

SQL-D (distributor) and SQL-S (subscriber).  Do I need to connect to the distributor instance and the subscriber instance when removing transactional replication or is it just really connecting to the publisher and click delete on the publication? I want everything gone including any metadata, systems tables, distributions db and any other replication objects created during the initial configuration.

View 6 Replies View Related

Can Some One Help Me With SQL VIEWS

Apr 15, 2008

Hi everyone,                    I have a problem like this . I have tables Coursegroupcode, which has groupname, codeI have Courses That has Coursename, its code(group code),Term, Course Number Enrollment table which has Foreign keys Term,Course NUmber , SSN     I need to get a view like thisI should list all the coursecodes and people enrolled for each course code for selected terms  Course Table Primary keys(TERM,COUSE Number)Enrollment Table(Foreign keys) TERM ,COURSE NUMBER, SSNplease help 

View 9 Replies View Related

Sql Views

Apr 7, 2005

 Hi!
I need to know if i can build an aspx file on top of an sql view? I
can only see my tables when i connect to the database....
Collette.

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL Views

Oct 18, 2005

Can SQL Views insert to the tables they are created from?I have a database that is not well structured. It has a lot of redundency. What I want to do is create a SQL View that brings in all the data I need and have my application use that new SQL View instead of the data tables. Then I want to be able to insert new information to a SQL View that actualy gets inserted into the tables that the SQL Viewer is created from.Can this be done?Does this make any sense?

View 1 Replies View Related

Views

Mar 26, 2001

I have a query which unions the four select statements.....

the select statements are joined with other tables and views.....


When i execute the query i get ODBC timeout error........

But the strange thing is that if i execute the view individually once and again execute the query it works fine.......and later it justs works fine....

Can anyone tell why is it like that.......

Thanks,
Sajai.

View 1 Replies View Related

SP's And Views

May 23, 2000

Is there a performance hit running a sp against a view versus a base table. The view just excludes
several of the records based on some criteria, and all the data I will be retreiving is included in
the view. Or should I just stick my criteria in the SP to exclude the data?

View 1 Replies View Related

Iif Views

Jun 19, 2000

Is there a way to imbed "iif"-like logic in a SQL view? "case when" works in regular queries, but apparently is not supported in views...

View 1 Replies View Related

Views

Aug 14, 2002

I have some rather complex views to work with. Do they slow you down? Would it be better to move a view into a stored procedure? Is there any difference between these three solutions?
<B>1.Using views:</b>
Create view X
As
Select Col1, Col2, Col3 from Table1
Go

Create view Y
As
Select Col1, Col2, Col3 from Table2
Go

Create proc Z
As
Select X.Col2, X.Col3, Y.Col2, Y.Col3
From X inner join Y on X.Col1 = X.Col1
GO

<b>2.Using just a stored proc:</b>
Create proc Z
As
Select X.Col2, X.Col3, Y.Col2, Y.Col3
from
(Select Col1, Col2, Col3 from Table1) X inner join
(Select Col1, Col2, Col3 from Table2) Y on X.Col1 = Y.Col1

<b>.Joining tables</b>
Create proc Z
As
Select Table1.Col2, Table1.Col3, Table2.Col1, Table2.Col3
FromTable1 inner join Table2 on Table1.Col1 = Table2.Col1
go

Thank you!

View 1 Replies View Related

VIEWS

Aug 1, 2001

I am struggling with setting up views in SQL Server 7.0 and 2000. What types of views are available.

I have one database with 112 tables and 2308 fields.

Thanks in Advance

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved