Replication With Host_name

Apr 13, 2006

Hello,

   I am wanting to limit the amount of rows that are merged between the server and the wm device. Host_name() doesn't seem to be supported in sql mobile. I created a column called host and set the default value as host_name(). I get the table to replicate however when I try to insert into the table on the mobile side I get errors. Is there another option to filter like this or if I hard code a deviceID how can I add this to the filter rows options? Thanks.

John

 

Table script:

CREATE TABLE [dbo].[tstHost](

[peoplid] [numeric](18, 0) NOT NULL,

[image] [image] NULL,

[host] [varchar](50) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_tstHost_host] DEFAULT (host_name()),

[rowguid] [uniqueidentifier] ROWGUIDCOL NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [MSmerge_df_rowguid_F9DD287E09FF4064813E154D2F0ACBC6] DEFAULT (newsequentialid()),

CONSTRAINT [PK_tstHost] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED

(

[peoplid] ASC

)WITH (IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF) ON [PRIMARY]

) ON [PRIMARY] TEXTIMAGE_ON [PRIMARY]

 

Query on sql mobile side:

insert into tsthost (peopleid) values (2)

Error:
FAILED: insert into tsthost (peopleid) values (2)
Error: 0x80040e14 DB_E_ERRORSINCOMMAND
Native Error:  (25503)
Description: The column name is not valid. [,,,Node name (if any),Column name,]
Interface defining error: IID_ICommand
Param. 0: 0
Param. 1: 0
Param. 2: 0
Param. 3:
Param. 4: peopleid
Param. 5:

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Host_name

Nov 1, 2005

Hi,I have a question regarding host_name() and IP addresses of clients. I'mrunning on a shared server - so access to xp_cmdshell is barred which is thestandard response to questions about getting the IP address of a client fromsql server. My issue is this:For security reasons every user of our database system logs into our customsecurity system all under the *same* sql-server user name (who only hasaccess to a discrete set of stored procedures). This can't be changed as weare limited to 3 database users. I store the host_name that the user log'sin from when he logs in - and then check the host_name of any further callsto sp's under this login context. I have however just discovered thathost_name() is set in the connection string - so the client can pass prettymuch whatever he wants to - so all an imposter would have to do is *fake*the client name of an existing user. Is there anyway of detecting the *real*client's host? Is there any way of forcing a client to be limited to justone client machine? Can I get hold of the IP address in a reliable way?ThanksNick

View 4 Replies View Related

How To Get HOST_NAME Insted Of User_name()

Jun 7, 2001

All developers use same login to access database (I know is it is not the best solution)

We need track when user insert value or edit value in specific table
It is done by triger and work fine with USER_ID() or user_name()

But all users (developers) use same login and USER_ID() and user_name()always the same.

Please help me how can get HOST_NAME of user who is trying to modify table and place it into triger insted of user_name()

Thanks a lot

View 2 Replies View Related

Using Host_name(): Crossing My Fingers...

Jul 20, 2005

I did this thing with host_name(). I'm hoping someone can tell me ifI'm gonna get into trouble with this scheme before it's too late...I have maybe 75 users.They all call on a table of appointments (many thousands) and I dumpthe ones being viewed into a temp table named TaskTEMP.I am using a custom function within a View to grab a bunch of rows inone table and slap them into a single column on the records returnedby the view.Here's where I'm concerned-When I insert the records into the TempTable I insert the valueHOST_NAME() into every row of a column named myMachine.So the row looks like:TaskID aName myMachine1234 Jim Smith Dell1011235 Fran Jones Dell1011235 Mary Cat Dell101When I run the view, I get:TaskID myNames1234 Jim Smith1235 Fran Jones, Mary CatWhat I'm concerned about is when user 2 is looking at the same recordat the same time and inserts the following into TaskTEMP:1234 Jim Smith CompaqXYZ1235 Fran Jones CompaqXYZ1235 Mary Cat CompaqXYZI use the HOST_NAME()filter in the example below to deal with this sothat both user one and user two get what they want instead of:TaskID myNames1234 Jim Smith, Jim Smith1235 Fran Jones, Mary Cat, Fran Jones, Mary CatIt works great in testing. The obvious problem is if two users havethe same machine name, but in this installation business rules preventthat.I hope someone can either validate this approach or improve or trashit before it gets too late with this project.thanks.lqThe view and function look looks like this:SELECT TaskID, dbo.fn_myNameGroup(TaskID) AS myNamesFROM dbo.TaskTEMPGROUP BY TaskIDIDThe function looks like this:CREATE function dbo.fn_myNameGroup(@TaskID as int) returnsnvarchar(500)asbegindeclare @ret_value nvarchar(500)SET @ret_value=''Select @ret_value=@ret_value + '; ' + aName FROM TaskTEMP whereTaskID=@TaskID AND myMachine=HOST_NAME()RETURN RIGHT(@ret_value,LEN(@ret_value)-2)end

View 3 Replies View Related

HOST_NAME() Filter Issue

Feb 5, 2007

I am using dynamic filtering on host_name() for SQL 2005 SP1 merge publication. It had been working fine, but something has caused the configuration to stop working.

Setting up the publication and a test subscription via the GUI works fine. However, if I script out the publication and subscription and attempt to run the script (with suitable password), then I get the error

€œa value for the parameter @host_name was specified while publication does not use host_name() for dynamic filtering€?

I did some digging and was curious to find some differences in the information returned by sp_helpmergepublication and the content of dbo.sysmergepublications.

The sp_helpmergepublication output showed expected content after both GUI and script setup €“ with a value of HOST_NAME() for validate_subscriber_info.

The content of dbo.sysmergepublications was as expected after setup via the GUI €“ with a value of HOST_NAME() for dynamic_filters_function_list.

However, I noticed that if I performed setup using scripts the dynamic_filters_function_list value was null.

Further note that the subset_filter_clause value was correct for the filtered article with both GUI and script setup (<column name> = HOST_NAME())

After some experimentation, I found that if I executed sp_changemergearticle to set the subset_filter_clause again (after all the normal publication setup scripts had run) €“ then the dynamic_filters_function_list value in dbo.sysmergepublications became correct €“ and everything started working again.

This looks like a bug to me €“ and although the workaround above seems to work €“ it would be good to know if this is a known issue

If this is not a known issue, then I will attempt to put together a simpler repro than I currently have available.

aero1

View 6 Replies View Related

Problem With HOST_NAME Function With Linked View

Oct 30, 2005

I have an Access 2000 MDB file with a SQL 7 back end. I have a main tablewith 50,000 records; and I have a selections table with 50,000 records foreach machine that uses the database (about 25-50). This allows each user tohave their own set of selections.The selections table has three fields: ID (int), Sel (bit), MachName(varchar). ID and MachName comprise the primary key.I have a view that combines the main table and the entries for theselections table for the current machine (SQL below). The view works finewhen opened in EM and QA. And if I create a pass-through query from myAccess MDB file, the results are displayed fine.However, if I link the view to the Access MDB file, I get "#Deleted" inevery field of every record (which seems to indicate that the records werethere and then they were gone). However, if I hard-code the machine nameinto the same view instead of using HOST_NAME and then relink the view tothe MDB file, the linked view opens fine. Only when I use HOST_NAME as aparameter in the view is there a problem with it.Anyone have any idea what's going on here, or have heard of any issues withHOST_NAME and ODBC linked objects? SQL for the view is below.Thanks!NeilSELECT INVTRY.*, InvtrySelections.Sel, InvtrySelections.MachNameFROM dbo.INVTRY INNER JOINdbo.InvtrySelections ONdbo.INVTRY.ID = dbo.InvtrySelections.IDWHERE (dbo.InvtrySelections.MachName = HOST_NAME())

View 20 Replies View Related

Problem With PreComputed Partitions And Numeric Partition Key (HOST_NAME())

Nov 2, 2006

BOL says the following (headed with important):

"The HOST_NAME() function returns an nchar value, so you must use CONVERT if the column in the filter clause is of a numeric data type, as it is in the example above. For performance reasons, we recommended that you not apply functions to column names in parameterized row filter clauses, such as CONVERT(nchar,EmployeeID) = HOST_NAME(). Instead, we recommend using the approach shown in the example: EmployeeID = CONVERT(int,HOST_NAME()). This clause can be used for the @subset_filterclause parameter of sp_addmergearticle (Transact-SQL), but it typically cannot be used in the New Publication Wizard (the wizard executes the filter clause to validate it, which fails because the computer name cannot be converted to an int). If you use the New Publication Wizard, it is recommended to specify CONVERT(nchar,EmployeeID) = HOST_NAME() in the wizard and then use sp_changemergearticle (Transact-SQL) to change the clause to EmployeeID = CONVERT(int,HOST_NAME()) before creating a snapshot for the publication."

We have setup a publication with this scenario and by accident a nonconvertable HOST_NAME slipped in when someone tried to create a subscription in the database with the wrong parameters.

The consequence was not only that he failed to create the misconfigured subscription but all our several hundred subscriptions failed to synchronize from this point on.

It's weird that one single subscription causes all other subscriptions to fail (BUG??) but how to resolve this miserable situation?

First thing I tried was to delete the faulty partition via the Publication Wizard but all I got was an nasty error which was also related to the SQL Server trying to convert the partition string to integer.....

The next thing I tryed was setting PreComputed Partitions to false and re-initialize all subscriptions. Also this did not help. All the failed subscriptions continued to fail synching.

As a thing of last resort I changed the article filter to convert the partition key to nvarchar and then compare it to the HOST_NAME() value. Thank god this worked and the existing subscriptions started to synch successfully again.

So my question is:
How do you correctly recover in this situation?
As it really a wanted feature that one faulty partition causes all subscriptions to fail?
Shouldn't it be possible to delete the unwanted partition?

Thank you for your help!

regards, Stefan

View 8 Replies View Related

SQL 2005 Error: Replication-Replication Distribution Subsystem: Agent (null) Failed.

Jun 15, 2007

I'm getting this, after upgrading from 2000 to 2005.Replication-Replication Distribution Subsystem: agent (null) failed.The subscription to publication '(null)' has expired or does notexist.The only suggestions I've seen are to dump all subscriptions. Sincewe have several dozen publications to several servers, is there adecent way to script it all out, if that's the only suggestion?Thanks in advance.

View 3 Replies View Related

Replication Issues After A Database Restore - Unable To Drop Or Create Transactional Replication

Sep 13, 2007

Hi,I have transactional replication set up on on of our MS SQL 2000 (SP4)Std Edition database serverBecause of an unfortunate scenario, I had to restore one of thepublication databases. I scripted the replication module and droppedthe publication first. Then did a full restore.When I try to set up the replication thru the script, it created thepublication with the following error messageServer: Msg 2714, Level 16, State 5, Procedure SYNC_FCR ToGPRPTS_GL00100, Line 1There is already an object named 'SYNC_FCR To GPRPTS_GL00100' in thedatabase.It seems the previous replication has set up these system viewsSYNC_FCR To GPRPTS_GL00100. And I have tried dropping the replicationmodule again to see if it drops the views but it didn't.The replication fails with some wired error & complains about thisviews when I try to run the synch..I even tried running the sp_removedbreplication to drop thereplication module, but the views do not seem to disappear.My question is how do I remove these system views or how do I make thereplication work without using these views or create new views.. Whyis this creating those system views in the first place?I would appreciate if anyone can help me fix this issue. Please feelfree to let me know if any additional information or scripts needed.Thanks in advance..Regards,Aravin Rajendra.

View 2 Replies View Related

Adding New Table In Replication And Changing One Column Replication Database

Jan 17, 2002

Hi,

In my production box is running on SQL7.0 with Merge replication and i want add one more table and i want add one more column existing replication table. Any body guide me how to add .This is very urgent
Regards
Don

View 1 Replies View Related

DBCC OPENTRAN Shows REPLICATION On A Server That Is Not Configured For Replication

Aug 22, 2007

Hello,

I have this problem on a Production database.

DBCC OPENTRAN shows "REPLICATION" on a server that is not configured for replication. The transaction log is almost as large as the database (40GB) with a Simple recovery model. I would like to find out how the log can be truncated in such a situation.

Thank you.

View 4 Replies View Related

Identity Range Managed By Replication Is Full And Must Be Updated By A Replication Agent. Error Message Makes NO SENSE.

Mar 6, 2007

Hello,I'm getting the following error message when I try add a row using aStored Procedure."The identity range managed by replication is full and must be updatedby a replication agent".I read up on the subject and have tried the following solutionsaccording to MSDN without any luck.(http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/304706 )sp_adjustpublisheridentityrange (http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa239401(SQL.80).aspx ) has no effectFor Testing:I've reloaded everything from scratch, created the pulications from byrunning the sql scripts generated,created replication snapshots andstarted the agents.I've checked the current Identity values in the Agent Table:DBCC CHECKIDENT ('Agent', NORESEED)Checking identity information: current identity value '18606', currentcolumn value '18606'.I check the Table to make sure there will be no conflicts with theprimary key:SELECT AgentID FROM Agent ORDER BY AgentID DESC18603 is the largest AgentID in the table.Using the Table Article Properties in the Publications PropertiesDialog, I can see values of:Range Size at Publisher: 100,000Range Size at Subscribers: 100New range @ percentage: 80In my mind this means that the Publisher will assign a new range whenthe Current Indentity value goes over 80,000?The Identity range for this table cannot be exhausted! I'm not surewhat to try next.Please! any insight will be of great help!Regards,Bm

View 1 Replies View Related

Replication :: Difference Between Snapshot And Transaction And Merge Replication?

May 26, 2015

What is the main difference between snapshot and transactional and merge replication?

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL Express Replication And Problems Accessing Data After Replication

Jul 28, 2006

Hi,

I have a VB.net app that access a SQL Express database. I have transactional repliaction set up on a SQL 2000 database (the publisher) and a pull subscription from the VB.net app. I use RMO in the VB app to connect to the publisher. My problem is I am getting some strange behaviour as follows

- if I run the app and invoke the pull subscription it works fine. If I then close my app and go back in, I can access my data without any problem

- If I run the app and try to access data in my SQL Express database it works fine. I can then close the app, reopen it and run the pull subscription it works fine

however.......

- if I run the app, invoke the pull subscription (which runs fine), and then try to access data in my local SQL Express database without firstly closing and reopening the app, I get a login error

- if I run the app, try to access data in my local SQL Express database (which works fine), and then try to run the pull subscription I get a "the process cannot acces the file as it is being used by another process" error. In this case I need to restart the SQL Express service to be able to run replication again.

I get exactly the same behaviour when I use the Windows Sync tool (with my app open at the same time) instead of my RMO code to replicate the data.

I am using standard ADO.Net 2 code to access my SQL Express data in the app and closing all connections etc

Any advice appreciated !

Thanks
Ronan





View 2 Replies View Related

Does Replication Affect Tempdb GROWTH Replication

Jun 28, 2007

Hi all,

I have recently setup a transactional replication in MS SQL 2000. After setting up the replication the clients TempDB grew by almost 60GB. Now the client is Blaming me for the TempDB GROWTH and saying that its because of the replication being setup i tried to convince them but they are not satisfied yet. Can anybody please tell me does replication cause the tempdb to grow. If yes then how. can u suggest any good link for getting to know the internal working of SQL Server replication????



Thanks in advance

Jacx

View 3 Replies View Related

How Do We Add A New Column To A Merge Replication Article, But Specify It As Not For Replication?

Aug 30, 2007

Hi all,

I know that adding a column using ALTER TABLE to add a column automatically allows SQLSERVER 2005 to replicate the schema changes to the subscribers, however, I would like to add a new column to an existing article that is being used for merge replication, however, I don't want this column to be replicated. Re-initialising the subscriptions is not a option. Help would be appreciated.

I am using SQLSERVER 2005 (SP1).

View 3 Replies View Related

Replication :: Transactional Replication Removal Sequence

Sep 2, 2015

I have been researching on the proper steps or sequence to follow to completely remove SQL Server 2012 Transactional Replication.  I have read articles about using SSMS as well as using replication stored procedures and some procedures use SQLCMD or just regular TSQL executed in SSMS.  I have also read articles where people said all you really need is connect to the Publisher instance, find the publication you want to remove and choose "Delete" and everything will be taken care of behind the scene. I have three SQL servers that participate in transactional replication.  SQL-P (publisher), 

SQL-D (distributor) and SQL-S (subscriber).  Do I need to connect to the distributor instance and the subscriber instance when removing transactional replication or is it just really connecting to the publisher and click delete on the publication? I want everything gone including any metadata, systems tables, distributions db and any other replication objects created during the initial configuration.

View 6 Replies View Related

DB Replication Or Table Replication Via Triggers?

Apr 17, 2007

Hello everyone,I am involved in a scenario where there is a huge (SQL Server 2005)production database containing tables that are updated multiple timesper second. End-user reports need to be generated against the data inthis database, and so the powers-that-be came to the conclusion that areporting database is necessary in order to offload report processingfrom production; of course, this means that data will have to bereplicated to the reporting database. However, we do not need all ofthe data in the production database, and perhaps a filtering criteriacan be established where only certain rows are replicated over to thereporting database as they're inserted (and possibly updated/deleted).The current though process is that the programmers designing thequeries/reports will know exactly what data they need from productionand be able to modify the replication criteria as needed. For example,programmer A might write a report where the data he needs can beexpressed in a simple replication criteria for table T where column X= "WOOD" and column Y = "MAHOGANY". Programmer B might come along amonth later and write a report whose relies on the same table T wherecolumn X = "METAL" and column Z in (12, 24, 36). Programmer B willhave to modify Programmer A's replication criteria in such a way as toaccomodate both reports, in this case something like "Copy rows fromtable T where (col X = "WOOD" and col Y = "MAHOGANY") or (col X ="METAL" and col Z in (12, 24, 36))". The example I gave is reallytrivial of course but is sufficient to give you an idea of what thecurrent thought-process is.I assume that this is a requirement that many of you may haveencountered in the past and I am wondering what solutions you wereable to come up with. Personally, I believe that the above method isprone to error (in this case the use of triggers to specifyreplication criteria) and I'd much rather use replication services tocopy tables in their entirety. However, this does not seem to be anoption in my case due to the sheer size of certain tables. Is thereanything out there that performs replication based on complexprogrammer defined criteria? Are triggers a viable alternative? Anyalternative out-of-the-box solutions?Any feedback would be appreciated.Regards!Anthony

View 11 Replies View Related

Merge Replication Set Off Transactional Replication

Oct 9, 2007

I am working on bringing our disaster recovery site to be a live site. Currently we replicate to one of out servers (server B) with merge replication (from server A). Server A also does one way transactional replication form some table to several other servers including servers at the DR site.

This setup is not going to be fast enough for what we need so I am wondering if a table is receiving merge replication will the merge updates also replicate down the transaction path??

Example...
Server B update a row and merges to Server A. With this update them replicate (via transactional) to Server C??

thanks...

View 5 Replies View Related

Publisher Is Empty Under Replication Monitor - Publisher.! But Replication Is Still Running Fine..

Nov 9, 2006

I have a wired situation..!I set up transactional replication on one of my development server (SQL2000 Dev Edition with sp4).It is running fine without any issues and all of a sudden, i noticed inmy repication monitor tab under Publisher where I usually see thepublication is empty now.I do see the snapshot agent, log reader and distribution agent under myagents inside the replication Monitor. But its usefull to see all 3agents in one window under publisher before. What happend? Is there anyway to get that inside that monitor? Has someone encountered thissitation before? Please advise....After that I tried to create a new set of replication on differentdatabase on the same server and i dont see those either underReplication Monitor - Publishers....All it says is (No Items)....I would appreciate any help to correct this issue... Thanks in advance..

View 2 Replies View Related

Red X Show On Replication Monitor (publications Is Disconnected From Replication Monitor)

Jan 30, 2007

I have setup transactional replication everything on one box. later(two or three weeks later), Replication monitor is show red X Under my publishers (publications is disconnected). this is SQL2005.

Everyone known how to fix this problem?

Thanks,

Frank

View 1 Replies View Related

Replication Without Replication? Thoughts Welcome

Apr 24, 2007

Hi,

I have a particularly difficult problem.

I have a SQL Server in an internal network and need to "replicate" to an identical server and database in a DMZ. The DMZ can only receive files sent by a custom component and no port(s) can be opened in the firewall or standard FTP used.

I also need to minimise traffic (i.e. sending whole tables is not an issue as some contain millions of rows), replicate approx once hourly and allow record locking only (as opposed to DB locking/exclsuive access or table locking).

Any thoughts / experiences greatly appreciated otherwise I'm looking at putting triggers on all the tables to monitor changes and generate SQL statements for execution against the DMZ server.

View 4 Replies View Related

Combining Peer-to-Peer Transactional Replication With Standard Transactional Replication

Dec 1, 2006

Hello,

I'm interested in combining the Peer-to-Peer Transactional Replication and Standard Transactional Replication to provide a scale out solution of SQL Server 2005. The condition is as follows:

We may have 10 SQL Server 2005 (1 Publisher + 9 Subscriber) running transactional replication in the production environment and allow updates in subscribers. To offload the loading of the publisher, we plan to have 2 Publisher (PubNode1 and PubNode2) using Peer-to-Peer Transaction Replication and the rest 8 subscribers will be divided into 2 groups. The subscribers 1-4 (SubNode1, SubNode2, SubNode3, and SubNode4) will be set to be standard transactional replication subscribers of PubNode1, and the rest 4 subscribers (SubNode5, ..., SubNode8) will be set to be standard transactional replication subscribers of PubNode2.

Is it possible to setup above 2 Publisher + 8 Subscriber topology?
Also, could we set the 8 subscribers with updatable subscriptions to achieve each node is updatable?

We do not plan to set all the 10 nodes using Peer-to-Peer Transactional Replication as it is necessary to make sure n*(n-1)/2 (i.e. 45) peer-to-peer connections is reliable. It seems that the maintenance cost is high if the servers are not in a LAN and the topology is very high coupling. So we prefer to divide the 10 nodes into 2 groups and reduce the cost of each node to maintain the connections to all other sites.

That's the scenario.

Any feedback is welcome and appreciated.

Thanks,
Terence

View 4 Replies View Related

Replication

Sep 12, 2006

I was working on a project that use local and remote SQL server. In order to keep the database up-to-date I wanted to implement replication on the SQL servers. But unfortunately the transaction replication which meet my requirement best is disabled on the replication configuration module (snapshoot and merge replications are active). Is there any way I can make the transaction replication enabled. I know it was supposed to be enabled by default. I’m using Windows 2003 server and SQL server 2000.  Sincerely  

View 3 Replies View Related

NOT FOR REPLICATION

Feb 4, 2008

NOT NET REPLICATION: indicates that the IDENTITY property should not be enforced when a replication login such as  sqlrepl inserts data into the table.
What is purpose statement above?

View 1 Replies View Related

Should I Use Replication?

Apr 11, 2004

I have a failry complicated problem, or at least I think its complicated.

I'm working with a database that is not very normalized, and I was asked to make a portion of the dataset it available to web users.

Rather than build a complicated mess on top of the existing database, I opted to create an entirey new database inspired by the original, only normalize the data. So, where I had 3 tables in the old system..I now have around 10 nice and neat normalized tables.

Now the trick is to get the data from the original database to the new one. I could write my own application to do this, but I wasn;t sure if SQL's built in replication would be of any help.

I think I'm a little bit confused because thetwo DB schemas are very different from one another, and I'm not sure if built in Replication can work with this sort of set up.

Luckicly, the replication pretty much on needs to go one way, from the original database to the new one. The original databse will still be in use, but for the most part only insert will be happening there, and a few updates. In the new database, there will be no inserts, but there will be updates, and they don't have to be replicated back to the original DB. So, that seems pretty easy to me.


If I were to use replication rather than write my own tool to sync up the data, how woudl I go about this, and is it even possible?

One thing I thought of was was creating a bunch of views in the original database, that looked just like the tables in the new system..and having replicaiton work with those...the only downside I see is the views will have no relationships, and in the new DB all the tables have valid relationships..so I may run into situations where child records are getting replication before parant records..and that will cause issues.

Any advice would be helpful. Thanks guys!

View 1 Replies View Related

Replication

Oct 17, 2005

I've been trying to setup transactional replication with two servers
for 2 weeks now with little success. Can anyone point me to a good
article or something that will help me.

View 1 Replies View Related

Replication From 2k To 6.5

Nov 20, 2001

I am in the process of setting up replication from SQL2k to 6.5.
Both server have mixed authentication and are using the same login
that has domain rights and is a local admin on each box.
However, repliation fails with this error message;

Login failed- User: Reason: Not associated with a trusted SQL Server connection.

I have tried searching this site, BOL and other newgroups sites for
a step by step guide to setting up replication, but am unable to find anything.
Anyone have any suggestions ?

Please advise
Thanks

View 1 Replies View Related

Replication

May 29, 2002

Hi!
I have two SQL Servers as a part of one domain. I'm going to set up transactional replication between them.
What start up account should be for SQL Server Agent on a both machine?

Thank you,
Elena.

View 1 Replies View Related

Replication

May 6, 2001

Can anyone help me on how to start on implementing a replication in SQL Server 7 like scripts, etc...

View 3 Replies View Related

Replication Vs. DTS?

May 31, 2001

adding another SQL 7.0 for development. Environment is totally DSS, no OLTP; all updates are via BCP.
Eventually want to move valid tables/data to prod 7.0 server; would this best be accomplished via replication, DTS, or some other method? TIA.

View 1 Replies View Related

DTS Or Replication

Jul 27, 2001

Hi Guys,
I am Having a 70GB Database with around 1200 Tables On a Server A1, we are planning to replicate this database to a reporting database on an Reporting Server R1.This Is Done at the end of Every Month and it is read only database.
So my question is weather to use SnapShot Replication or DTS. Any help is appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

Hari

View 1 Replies View Related

Replication

Jul 27, 2001

In all the replication types, The tables to be replicated must have have a primary key.

Thanks
in advance.

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved