Report Limited To Top 8 But Not In The SQL Satement?
Mar 28, 2007
I got a report that seems to be limiting its displayed data to the first 8 records but not in the SQL statement itself. Although I have been working with SQL for many years I'm very new to Reporting Services so it may be something very simple, like perhaps a property that can be changed on the report for me to increase the amount of records the report is pulling from the database?
I don't seem to find any property set to 8 though.
Also the report is not pulling the records in the order the query pulls them, but in an apparent random order, I don't need to change this but it may help describe the report a bit better.
Hey I know the question is not normal.The thing is I have a stored procedure which has more than one select statement means when the procedure will be executed it will return two values.I have just given asmall exapmle for this Create Proc GetDetails() As Begin Select * from member Select count(mem_name)from member End Now what i want the out put of (Select * from member) wiil be displayed in grid and the out put of (Select count (mem_name) from member) will be in a text box.So How to get these two values.Please Help Me.
I am trying to setup a query that receives input variables one being a number which could be null (could receive as string).
What I want to happen is if a number is sent the data is filtered by that number but if it is empty no filtering is performed I think this involves using a case statement in a where clause but can't work out the syntax I am using sql 200 server.
I think the case statement is something like this: (week_no = CASE @week WHEN null THEN '#' ELSE @week END) or maybe I am way off
I considered using like @inNumber + '%' but this would cause the problem of if I inoput 2 it would also return 20's 200's ...
I would like to run a simple select statement that pulls records from a table and returns a dataset. It is a dataset of teams. Then I want to populate a highly customized table with that dataset. The table will be a tournament bracket full of teams. Can I do something like this or do I have to display the dataset in a datagrid? Oh and this is a webmatrix project using MSDE. Anybody have any suggestions?
I have a variable that is created dynamically that will be used as an input for a sql statement. When I display the variable in a text box it looks like this: (PROP_CLASS IN ('" & 100 & "','" & 101 & "' )) The following works when I hard code the values into the SQL statement: strSQL = "SELECT * FROM web_transfer WHERE (PROP_CLASS IN ('" & 100 & "','" & 101 & "' )) AND ........."But I get no values returned when I use the variable directly in the sql: strSQL = "SELECT * FROM web_transfer WHERE (PROP_CLASS IN (" & propertyClass & ")) AND ..........." The propertyClass variable is the text string “(PROP_CLASS IN ('" & 100 & "','" & 101 & "' ))“. How do I add this variable to the sql string so that it is recognized. I guess that it is adding some hidden characters. Any help please?? I am a newbie to this, s
I have a search query on my page. However, since the resultset may be very large, I want to retreive only those results that are currently shown on the gridview page.Often a user won't browse through more than a couple of pages, so it's b-*** to send all the records to the client.I know that with a sp you can define that you want to retrieve the first or second x records, but I want to do this with SQL...is that possible?
I'd like to create a limited user on SQL Server 2005 to minimize any possible problems with my ASP.NET 2.0 website. My question is how limited can I make that user? What exactly does it need to be able to do? (In case it makes a difference, my site utilizes membership, profiles, and roles, as well as some custom tables and stored procedures that I created.) Thanks in advance for any advice! :-)
hi all, I have a field which name is Information and it type is Varchar (8000),but some time data access than 8000 character, my client told me,make this field to store Unlimited data. So how can i achive this task, i m using VS 2003 (ASP.NET with VB.NET) with SQL 2000. Thanks Shally
Hiya - this might be a bit of a simple question but please bear with me! I have looked reasonably hard for this but can not find an answer:
I have an MSSQL 2000 server running on PC-A and would like to limit certain users (e.g. admin) to be only able to logon when using the actual PC-A machine.
I am aware that you can acheive this in MySQL with the "insert into user (host, user, password) values (localhost, username, password);" command. Is there an equivalent way to do this in MSSQL?
Hi, I couldn't make a clear title without writing 2 lines.
My problem (I tried to find out through the archives): this scenario will be used for several DBs on severals servers.
The remotes servers are not mine, I have only access to the backups files, I have no rights to setup a replication relationship.
I'm using a repository server with SQL 2005, and daily, I need to get the latest Full backup from an SQL2000 server, copy it to the repository server, restore it then delete the .bak file. This is possible by using many different scripts (like .vbs to copy and rename the latest Full backups) then I use SQL job for daily restore. Process is too long and the time estimated to start next task (and the backup keep growing).
Is there a way to do everything via SQL2005 script (job)?
Initially, the problem is that I have to do this with the Full backups every days (around 5 Dbs 8 Go in average). So if I can use the latest transaction log files (that would eliminate my first question). The best way is to use log shipping as well but sql2005 is needed on both sides.
I created a login in SQL Server 2005 for SQL Server Reporting Service training purpose. It seemed the login exceed the connection limit. There were 9 people in the training and some people got the connection errors. Sometimes the connection error went away after the user re-established the connection. Is there a default limit per login? If so, what is the default? Can I change it to unlimited? And how?
I want to use TRIGGER_NESTLEVEL to test if a specific trigger is on the execution stack.
Normally, the table with the trigger is accessed by stored procedures and the user does not have any direct access to the table.
I am having problems doing this because I need to use OBJECT_ID to get the ID to pass to TRIGGER_NESTLEVEL. OBJECT_ID is unable to see the table when the stored procedure is run as that limited user account.
How can I use TRIGGER_NESTLEVEL in this scenario without granting this user permissions on the table?
Here is complete code to reproduce. The output is: Nest level is: 1 (running as admin)
Nest level is: (null) (running as limited user)
The output that I want would have a 1 instead of (null). Hard coding the specific OBJECT_ID is not the solution that I am looking for, since I want to use identical database scripts on separate installs of my database.
Code Block IF OBJECT_ID(N'Hello') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE Hello IF DATABASE_PRINCIPAL_ID(N'TestUser') IS NOT NULL DROP USER TestUser IF OBJECT_ID(N'HelloProcedure') IS NOT NULL DROP PROCEDURE HelloProcedure GO
CREATE TABLE Hello ( ID INT PRIMARY KEY IDENTITY, Data INT NULL ) GO
CREATE TRIGGER HelloTrigger1 ON Hello FOR INSERT AS SET NOCOUNT ON UPDATE Hello SET Data = 1234 WHERE ID IN (SELECT ID FROM inserted) GO
CREATE TRIGGER HelloTrigger2 ON Hello FOR UPDATE AS SET NOCOUNT ON PRINT N'Nest level is: ' + ISNULL(CAST(TRIGGER_NESTLEVEL(OBJECT_ID(N'HelloTrigger1')) AS NVARCHAR(128)), N'(null)') GO
CREATE PROCEDURE HelloProcedure AS SET NOCOUNT ON INSERT INTO Hello VALUES (0) GO
CREATE USER TestUser WITHOUT LOGIN GO
GRANT EXECUTE ON HelloProcedure TO TestUser GO
EXEC (N'HelloProcedure') -- Prints: Nest level is: 1 GO
EXEC (N'HelloProcedure') AS USER = N'TestUser' -- Prints: Nest level is: (null) GO
I created a login in SQL Server 2005 for SQL Server Reporting Service training purpose. It seemed the login exceed the connection limit. There were 9 people in the training and some people got the connection errors. Sometimes the connection error went away after the user re-established the connection. Is there a default limit per login? If so, what is the default? Can I change it to unlimited? And how?
Hi all; qrymillcgetbytype_app ( stored query in MS-Access) in my code :
MS-ACCESS Part: query defination PARAMETERS prmMillToolType Long; SELECT MILLC.ID, MILLC.InsMillBdyID AS [Tool ID], MILLC.SubType, MILLC.Radius AS [End Radius], MILLC.CuttingDia AS [Tool Dia], MILLC.EffAxlCutLen AS [Effec Cut Length], MILLC.OverallLen AS [Overall Length], MILLC.HandOfCut AS [Hand Of Cut], MILLC.NoOfFlutes AS [No Of Flutes], MILLC.TmcID AS [Tool Class], MILLC.Comment, MILLC.Protrusion, MILLC.ShankDia, millC.ShoulderLen AS [Shoulder Length] FROM MILLC WHERE (((MILLC.[Mill Tool Type])=[prmMillToolType]) AND ((MILLC.[ON])=True)) ORDER BY MILLC.ID;
C++ PART bstrSQL contain stored query name "qrymillcgetbytype_app" hr = piRecordSet->put_Source(bstrSQL); piRecordSet->Open(vNull, vNull, adOpenKeyset, adLockOptimistic, adCmdUnknown)
it opens fine but when bstrSQL contain this query name " qrymillcgetbytype_app WHERE ID > -1 AND [Tool Dia] >= 0.000000 AND [Tool Dia] <= 5.000000 "
it displays the same output. Where clause won't work? Pls help me out.
ok, I am on Day 2 of being brain dead.I have a database with a table with 2 varchar(25) columns I have a btton click event that gets the value of the userName, and a text box.I NEED to insert a new row in a sql database, with the 2 variables.Ive used a sqldatasource object, and tried to midify the insert parameters, tried to set it at the button click event, and NOTHING is working. Anyone have a good source for sql 101/ASP.Net/Braindead where I can find this out, or better yet, give me an example. this is what I got <%@ Page Language="C#" %><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"><script runat="server"> protected void runit_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { //SqlDataSource ID = "InsertExtraInfo".Insert(); //SqlDataSource1.Insert(); } protected void Button1_Click1(object sender, EventArgs e) { SqlDataSource newsql; newsql.InsertParameters.Add("@name", "Dan"); newsql.InsertParameters.Add("@color", "rose"); String t_c = "purple"; string tempname = Page.User.Identity.Name; Label1.Text = tempname; Label2.Text = t_c; newsql.Insert(); }</script><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" ><head runat="server"> <title>mini update</title></head><body> <form id="form1" runat="server"> name<asp:TextBox ID="name" runat="server" OnTextChanged="TextBox2_TextChanged"></asp:TextBox><br /> color <asp:TextBox ID="color" runat="server"></asp:TextBox><br /> <br /> <asp:Button ID="Button1" runat="server" OnClick="Button1_Click1" Text="Button" /> <br /> set lable =><asp:Label ID="Label1" runat="server" Text="Label" Width="135px" Visible="False"></asp:Label><br /> Lable 2 => <asp:Label ID="Label2" runat="server" Text="Label"></asp:Label><br /> Usernmae=><asp:LoginName ID="LoginName1" runat="server" /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <asp:SqlDataSource ID="SqlDataSource1" runat="server" ConflictDetection="CompareAllValues" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:newstring %>" DeleteCommand="DELETE FROM [favcolor] WHERE [name] = @original_name AND [color] = @original_color" InsertCommand="INSERT INTO [favcolor] ([name], [color]) VALUES (@name, @color)" OldValuesParameterFormatString="original_{0}" SelectCommand="SELECT [name], [color] FROM [favcolor]" UpdateCommand="UPDATE [favcolor] SET [color] = @color WHERE [name] = @original_name AND [color] = @original_color"> <DeleteParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="original_name" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="original_color" Type="String" /> </DeleteParameters> <UpdateParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="color" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="original_name" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="original_color" Type="String" /> </UpdateParameters> <InsertParameters> <asp:InsertParameter("@name", "Dan", Type="String" /> <asp:InsertParameter("@color", "rose") Type="String"/> </InsertParameters> </asp:SqlDataSource> <asp:GridView ID="GridView1" runat="server" AllowPaging="True" AllowSorting="True" AutoGenerateColumns="False" DataKeyNames="name" DataSourceID="SqlDataSource1"> <Columns> <asp:CommandField ShowDeleteButton="True" ShowEditButton="True" ShowSelectButton="True" /> <asp:BoundField DataField="color" HeaderText="color" SortExpression="color" /> <asp:BoundField DataField="name" HeaderText="name" ReadOnly="True" SortExpression="name" /> </Columns> </asp:GridView> </form></body></html>
Im using the Xquery:SELECT @xmlDoc.query(' for $item in (/Collection/Content) where $item/Html/root/DocInfo/Webinar = "White Paper" order by $item[1]/Html[1]/root[1]/DocInfo[1]/Title[1] ascending return $item '); I only want to return the TOP 5 nodes (not the entire nodelist). What is the FLOWR expression or simplest way to return the limited nodeset? Thanks
Hi, I am trying to create a SQL Server user which would only have write permissions. This account would not be able to read, drop, alter, delete etc. It would simply be used to write data.
Is there a way to configure a user like this without scripting the permissions for each table. The DB has some dynamically generated tables, so the users privillges would ideally extend to those newly added tables without having to rerun some kind of script. Is this possible?
Hi, I am trying to create a SQL Server user which would only have write permissions. This account would not be able to read, drop, alter, delete etc. It would simply be used to write data.
Is there a way to configure a user like this without scripting the permissions for each table. The DB has some dynamically generated tables, so the users privillges would ideally extend to those newly added tables without having to rerun some kind of script. Is this possible?
Does anyone here know why xp_fixeddrives with a limited user returns an empty result set on 2005?
In essence I want to create a report which shows disk space remaining, an upgrade of an old one. It works fine on 2000, but seems to need sysadmin rights on 2k5. I would appreciate it if someone can suggest how to get it working - or an alternative solution!
someone recently told me that their bcp export of a table with over MAX_INT rows failed because BCP hit an overflow in the internal counter that bcp uses to tell you how many rows it's exported. You know how it write "rows copied to host file: 40000" to stdout? That number got to MAX_INT, then went negative, then BCP crashed. So they had to start all over and break things up with the -F, -L flags.
I was rather surprised that a program that claims to handle "bulk" data would use a 32 bit int to accumulate the count. I suppose the original sybase dev figured nobody would ever want to export more than 2b rows.
just wondering, has anyone seen this before?
I am about to kick off a similar large export and am planning to break it up so as not to hit this, but that also means I won't be able to verify that it is indeed a problem.
I am trying to insert records via ASP, with a user that has only writeaccess to the table (db_datawriter, db_denydatareader).That way, if the server is ever compromised, the access informationstored in the source code's connection string will not allow anybody toactually read the database.The problem is that I would like to use ADO methods to insert the data(to prevent SQL injections), but I can't seem to get the rightconnection. It works in plain SQL, but I'd rather not use it.My current code looks like this:connection="Provider=SQLOLEDB.1;User ID=DBwriter;Password=XXX;DataSource=MYSERVER;Initial Catalog=MYDB;"set conn=server.createobject("ADODB.Connection")conn.mode=2 ' adModeWriteconn.open connectionSet rs = Server.CreateObject ("ADODB.Recordset")rs.Open "MYTABLE", conn, adOpenKeySet, adLockPessimistic, adCmdTablers.AddNewrs.Fields("testfield") = "TESTDATA"rs.UpdateAnd the error I get is:Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server (0x80040E09)SELECT permission denied on object 'MYTABLE', database 'MYDB', owner'dbo'.(If I use a User with read privileges in the connection stringeverything works fine.)
I have a table with entries tied to a membership database. The problemis that I want to select a limit of sixteen entries per member, perday, where some members have 16+ entries per day.I have this so far ( which I've simplified for this post)SELECT dbo.members.firstname, dbo.members.lastname,dbo.entries.gameDayFROM dbo.members INNER JOINdbo.entries ON dbo.members.memberID =dbo.entries.memberIDIf it's day 5, each member should have 80 total.How can I change this to select only 16 entries for each member, makingsure it's 16 per day based on dbo.entries.gameDay?Thanks for your help.
I have a problem just today after added some tasks. I can only get the "OnPrevalidate" logging info only in both sysdts90 and a text file. Have I messed up with some setting?
I'm very new to this so excuse my naiveity...I have connected my desktop and laptop computer at home, on my desktop I have a series of db's under my default named instance <computername>/sqlexpress and I have created access logins using windows auth. When I connect to the desktop from the laptop using tcp:<computername>sqlexpressuserid I can only see the systemdb's...I am trying to view adventure works, just to see how this remote connection stuff works...any ideas?
I have connected my desktop and laptop computer at home, on my desktop I have a series of db's under my default named instance <computername>/sqlexpress and I have created access logins using windows auth. When I connect to the desktop from the laptop using tcp:<computername>sqlexpressuserid I can only see the system db's...I am trying to view adventure works, which I can see on the desktop fine using the same login...any ideas?
Hi I am using sql express to automatically generate users and logins from t-sql. I seem to be having a problem when it comes to restricting their access though. I only want them to be able to select on views and execute stored procedures. at the moment I have created a new database role, schema, login, and user, then added the user to the role but how do I restrict access to the above areas? do the restrictions go on the role, schema, or user? I must confess I find the whole schema and role issue a little confusing and just when I think I've got it, it turns out I haven't :( thanks
