We have developed few reports displaying data using chart layout. In the Data tab, we have specified MDX query that will return top 10 records.
But now, instead of restricting to just top 10 records, we would like to display all records and go in for pagination.
Is there some setting in the chart properties, where in I can display the first n records in first page, and the next n records( if available) in the next page and so on?
Can I specify the value of n somewhere in the propeties?
I read through many posts regarding pagination but those couldn't help me much.
I have simplified my question. For complex presentations of data it appears to me that the best practice is to put complicated code into a stored procedure that will make most of the formatting decisions, and keep the SSRS work in the report designer as simple as possible.
The following text is from the original question. I have an SSRS report which contains 2 tablixes. Each tablix has a different dataset coming from separate stored procedures. Currently, everything works good; the user selects one customer (customer A) to display the one page report for; data for customer A for the 1st tablix may contain 7 rows, and data for customer A for the 2nd tablix may contain 4 rows. User prints report, then chooses customer B which may have a different number of rows for each tablix.
I would like to give the user the option to select "All Customers" to display the report for all customers, one page per customer and I currently do not perceive that there is a way to paginate the report; one page per customer. When I pass in "All Customers" to the 2 stored procedures I get all of the correct data back; sorted by customer; so I can do some sort of page break on a row group on the customer name column, but I have 2 tablixes of data.
I have a drilldown report includes three groups. I add the last group for pagination. But the details in each page doesn't accord to I specified and the detail record number is different in different page.
Another issue is the interactive sort always sort in the first page scope. I set the data region or grouping to the table, and evaluate expression scrope to Detail scope.
I have two data sets but from the same data source. I created two different tables from these two data sets. Now I want to include a chart too. But When I insert the chart, it gives a erorr message.
The dinfinition of the report/my report name is invalid. More than one data set, data region or grouping in the report has the name'chart1_seriesgroup1'. data set, data region and grouping names must be unique within a report.
I've searched the forums on this issue, haven't really found the answer.
I have several nifty little sales reports which crunch a ton of data quite efficiently and render in just a few seconds in Report Manager. I've pushed as much of the data processing back to the server as possible, use a stored procedure (with parameters) in a shared datasource, don't return unneccessary data, all that. It works great.
When I first developed the reports, I continued generating my charts (which use the same data as the reports, just grouped differently) in Excel and pasting them in as images. Now I want to stop that nonsense and use the SSRS charts. I fooled around with the charting function and got a reasonable facimile of my Excel charts, two per report, which use their own separate stored procedures and the same shared datasource.
Now, reports that used to render in 5-8 seconds may take 1-5 MINUTES. Help! It's definitely the charts--taking them back out fixes the problem.
I have complete control over the datasources--would it make more sense to use non-shared sources, or to create totally separate shared sources? I saw a post that recommended "making data calls non-synchronous," but I have no idea how to do that.
I am able to preview my report in Microsoft Visual Studio with a chart embedded at the top of the report. However after uploading the report to Report Manager, the chart is blank. How can I get the chart to be visible in Report Manager? I am using SQL Server 2012 on a Windows Server 2012 R2 machine. I can see the chart if I edit the report in Report Building in the print layout mode. I can also see the chart in my Microsoft Visual Studio Project.
There is a one header in the report, when I publish and hit the report in IE(internet explor) the header appears fine on first page when I go to next page this header does not appear.
But in mozilla the header is visible on every page of the report. so it is working fine in mozilla.
Does any body know that creating free form rports using Report Builder is possible?
Free-form report - in the sense - that user should be able to drag the fields from the leftside fields pane and drop on body as we do in report designer using BI studio.
I could not figure out a way to do so. Is this a limitation?
Hi, My requirement is that when i show data the vertical scroll bar should be disabled.ie,whatever data can be accomodated in a screen should be shown and the rest should go to next page. I have tried restricting the no of rows shown to 20 but this wont work always as the font size may change.I had used the follwing for this: <GroupExpression>=Ceiling(RowNumber(Nothing)/20)</GroupExpression>
I have a report which consists of a list item, in which is a rectangle containing a header (as a subreport, but I think that's not relevant) and a subreport. The aforementioned rectangle is specified to include a pagebreak after each occurrence, but that pagebreak is not working as expected.
When I run the report I get 1 subreport on the first page, and exactly two on each subsequent page. Other than the pagination, I am getting very close to what I want. It's too bad that the subreport's pagination is ignored, but I can live with that for now.
Things I've already tried:
The report's pageSize and interactiveSize are both set to landscape
The subreport's report's pageSize and interactiveSize are both set to the actual size that the subreport takes up on the main report (which is ignored anyway)
The list does not have any of the page break options selected.
Hi, I have found the follwing article on internet. This article states two keywords LIMIT and OFFSET using which we can implement the pagination type of functionality in MySQL or PostgreeSQL, http://www.petefreitag.com/item/451.cfm
But is there any way using which we can implement pagination kind of functionality in SQL. LIke first time if i set 0 thenm it fetch the records from 1-10 then if i set 10 then it will fetch the next set of records from 11-20 like this, Can we do it in SQL?????
I'm working on a website where we're using .Net web services to feed data to a Flash front-end. The site will have a comments section and we want to display 15 or so comments per page with 'back' and 'next' functionalitiy. We'd also like to show the number of pages of comments and highlight the page they're on. The standard stuff that datagrids do so well. How can this be accomplished without a datagrid? There's a good page that explains a number of ways to do this using classic ASP. Some of the solutions they implement I can most likely use with .Net.http://www.aspfaq.com/show.asp?id=2120But I wanted to ask the community. How to paginate without a recordset? Sql Server 2000 back-end, ASP.NET 1.xThanks.
I'm still quite new to MSSQL so excuse the trivial questions. I've already tried searching through the forums on pagination as im sure its a big subject but couldn't find the answers i'm after.
I'm using MSSQL 2000 and asp .net 2.0 and basically need to paginate my results. My database contains roughly 250,000 rows of data, and one query would approximately return 30 results at the most. I would want to have 5 results per page.
I'm starting from scratch so was wondering what technique i could use. I can't use OFFSET as thats MySQL, is there an equivalent? I've heard mixed opinions on Cursors, but so far thats the only way i can see at the moment! :S
I am a PHP programmer for a small startup. We are storing person records and our MS SQL Server 2000 database has grown to the point where we wish to paginate the data before returning it to my PHP scripts.
I was wondering if anyone has any recommendations on an optimal way to manage this given the following requirements.
- Data must return only X number of rows at a time (user configurable). - Must be able to search by several diffent criteria (name, date, birthday, location, ...)
Also, I was wondering if it is possible to return the total number of existant rows of data as the first row of a MSSQL procedure.
Let me know what you think about the following code:DECLARE @MaxIdValue intDECLARE @MaxSortFieldValue nvarchar(50)SELECT TOP 1 @MaxIdValue = [id], @MaxSortFieldValue = [SortField]FROM (SELECT TOP PageNumber*RowsPerPage [id], [SortField]FROM MyTableWHERE (FilterCondition) ORDER BY [SortField], [id]) TORDER BY [SortField] DESC, [id] DESCSELECT TOP RowsPerPage * FROM MyTableWHERE ([SortField] >= @MaxSortFieldValue) AND (([id] > @MaxIdValue) OR([SortField] <> @MaxSortFieldValue)) AND (FilterCondition)ORDER BY [SortField], [id]This is a dynamic SQL and it should be easily fixable.PageNumber, RowsPerPage, FilterCondition and SortField are going to bethe variables and will be based on the user's searchcondition/criteria.-----------------------------Thanks for you attention.
I have a problem with paging in my report. My report is quite simple, I have a table with two grouping levels. Paging is not appearing besides there is a lot of rows displayed.
When I change the report to use only one grouping level, the paging works fine. Is paging being calculated on the first grouping level ? I have about 10 to 20 rows at the first level but about 1500 rows on the second one.
I changed a stored procedure that does pagination from the top style to the bottom style - mainly to avoid errors in differences in the 2 queries (count and select) and for conciseness. The performance on a large table for the bottom query was amazingly bad. The query plan is very different too. It was about 25 times slower on a 1 million row table. I am familiar with other pagination techniques (temp tables with identity, TOP-TOP, etc), but is there a way to use the ROW_NUMBER function AND get a count of records back in a single query with decent performance?
-- ------------------------------------------------------------- USE NorthWind
DECLARE @cnt Int SELECT @cnt = Count(*) FROM Customers
;WITH Cust AS ( SELECT CompanyName, ContactName, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY ContactName) AS rownum FROM Customers ) SELECT *, @cnt AS TRowCount FROM Cust WHERE rownum > 10 AND rownum <= 20 ORDER BY rownum -- ------------------------------------------------------------- -- ------------------------------------------------------------- USE NorthWind
;WITH Cust AS ( SELECT CompanyName, ContactName, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY ContactName) AS rownum, Count(*) OVER() AS TRowCount FROM Customers ) SELECT * FROM Cust WHERE rownum > 10 AND rownum <= 20 ORDER BY rownum -- -------------------------------------------------------------
The application retrieves limited records for paginated results. This way we can access large databases, but only return rows for one screen.
For example: Select row 1 - 10, then 11 - 20 then 21 to 30 etc.
With MySQL we can use LIMIT and OFFSET and it works great. MySQL SELECT <columns> FROM <tables> [WHERE <condition>] [ORDER BY <columns>] [LIMIT [offset,]howmany>]
Does anybody know how we can do something similar with MS SQL?
I have a need to perform pagination while using dynamic sorting. Asan exmaple -SELECT TOP(10) * FROM (SELECTTextColumn,DecimalColumn,ROW_NUMER() OVER (ORDER BYCASE @xWHEN 1 THEN TextColumnWHEN 2 THEN DecimalColumnENDDESC) AS SortOrderFROM Table1) AS Results WHERE SortOrder ( 10 ) ORDER BY SortOrderThis is obviously just some sample but an error is given because thedata type of the 2 columns used in the order by are different. Itworks if I cast DecimalColumn to match the textcolumn but then thesorting is wrong. Is there a way to do this in a single query with 2different data types?Thanks for your help.
I want to build a system that will have about 1 million rows in atable in sql server database.I am using this for a web application andaccessing it via JDBC type 4 driver.But display 20 records at a timeonly using pagination(as in google).What will be the best way to goabout this.
I would like to know how to show all the records returned (upto 1000) in one single page on a web browser. I am able to get the required report in IE but in case of Firefox it hangs.
Did some test and found that Firefox is able to render a report of upto max 300 records in a single page without getting hanged but report is coming very slow. While you scroll the scroll bar it€™s moving with Jerks. with 200 records in a single page is not getting hanged but report is faster than 300 records display. But by 500 records Firefox hangs. I understand it might be depending on the hardware also but am not sure.
Can anybody give me a good solution to display upto 1000 records in a single page or if its a limitation, where can i get the documentation of it.
WITH OrderedResults AS (SELECT some_table.*, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY some_field) as RowNumber FROM some_table) SELECT TOP 10 * FROM OrderedResults WHERE RowNumber > 10;
which works well for returning "paginated" recordsets. But when it comes to displaying "page" links and next and previous links, I need a total count of records found... something along the lines of the MySQL CALC_FOUND_ROWS feature...
Is there some built-in MSSQL feature I can use for this, or do I have to do a SELECT count(*) FROM some_table to get this data?
I am using MS SQL 2000 server db. I want a parameterised query for pagination support. I want to fetch a records in following order 1-100 then 100-200 , 200- 300 & so on in the format of "First Previous Next Last" i.e just want to fetch 100 records only per request
How can i do it with MS SQL 2000 server? any suggesions? Thanks in advance...
I need sql script where i will pass startindex, endindex and sortcol and order then query return result accordingly. it would be better if query looks small and dynamic.
Here one sample of dynamic sql but there case is used which is not require.
DECLARE @sql NVARCHAR(MAX) SET @sql = ';WITH cte as(SELECT *, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY ' + CASE (@SortColumn + ':' + @SortDirection)
[Code] ...
My requirement is that i will create a sp where i will pass start index and end index and sort column,sort order and filter means where clause and sp will generate and execute dynamic sql and return data. i need a sample of that kind of sp.
I use an embedded ReportViewer control as a LocalReport in a web form. The report displays the results in four pages and I need to display them all in one page (without any pagination). Is there a way to disable pagination? Also, what do I need to do to show the print button in toolbar?
I know people use ROW_NUMBER() function to do the pagination but my below two query is bit complex. Sohow to use pagination there ? I used ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY IsNull(A.OEReference, B.OEReference) ASC) as Line in one but not sure am i right or wrong.
IF IsNull(@GroupID,'') = '' SELECT IsNull(PartGroupName, 'UnMapped') AS PartGroupName, CASE IsNull(PartGroupName, '') WHEN '' THEN '' ELSE IsNull(IsNull(K.GroupID, IsNull(C.PartGroupID,'')),'') END AS PartGroupID,
I have a tried two different reports one with table and the other without The last textbox in both reports contains enough text which should fill half of first page and half of second page. In both reports the print preview and export to PDF keeps the first page blank and puts all the data in the second page. It appears that the textbox control doesn't know when to place a pagebreak when in print preview and export to PDF. The rdl file has no pagebreaks defined anywhere. Thanks in advance for your help!
