Restoring A SQL2000 Database To SQL2005 On A New Server
Apr 23, 2008
If I restore a SQL 2000 DB into 2005 it upgrades it for me.
When restoring a DB to a new server/instance of SQL, in SQL 2000 I had to carry out the sp_changedbowner procedure after the restore was complete.
Is the equivalent procedure when restoring a SQL 2000 DB to 2005 to go to the schema for the restored database, find the schema with the name of the SQL 2000 db owner and change the schema owner?
OR alternatively run the following query where mark is the db owner in 2000 and lladmin in the new user in 2005 ;
ALTER AUTHORIZATION ON SCHEMA::mark TO lladmin;
GO
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Oct 23, 2006
Is it possible to restore SQL2000 backup to SQL2005? Or I have to restore the DB to SQL2000 and then upgrade it to SQL2005?
Can someone provide me ways to upgrade SQL2000 DB to SQL2005?
Thanks,
Hiten
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 7, 2007
I am restoring a backup from SQL2000 Database to 2005 and I get this error :
An exception occured while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch
(Microsoft.SqlServer.ConnectionInfo)
Additional Information: Too many backup devices specified fro backup or restore; only 64 are allowed.
RESTORE HEADEEONLY is terminationg abnormally. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error 3205)
How do fix this? Please assist.
Thanx
View 17 Replies
View Related
Oct 19, 2006
Hey all,
Just went through migrating to SQL 2005 as well and we have a need to apply log shipping between SQL 2000 and SQL 2005. Well not shipping per say in the automated fashion that SQL 2005 offers but rather we need to apply SQL 2000 transaction logs to a SQL 2005 instance. Though the database is still in SQL 2000 version 80 and the secondary database needs to be available in read only. (STANDBY MODE)
When I attempt to restore either a FULL backup or transaction log I get the error:
RESTORE DATABASE is terminating abnormally. This backup cannot be restored using WITH STANDBY because a database upgrade is needed. Reissue the RESTORE without WITH STANDBY
The only way I could restore the FULL was by using the WITH RECOVERY OR NORECOVERY option during the restore process. The issue with this is I need the database in standby by mode in order to continue to append transaction logs.
Anybody have any thoughts how I might be able to get around this?
Thanks
Eric
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 15, 2007
We replicate a SQL2000 database (DataBaseA) to a SQL2000 database (DataBaseB) by using the Restore function and hasn't change its logical name but only the physical data path and file name. It is running fine for a year. We use the same way to migrate the DataBaseB to a new SQL2005 server with the Restore function and the daily operation is running perfect. However, when we do the Backup of DatabaseB in the SQL2005, it just prompt the error message
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlError: The backup of full-text catalog 'DataBaseA' is not permitted because it is not online. Check errorlog file for the reason that full-text catalog became offline and bring it online. Or BACKUP can be performed by using the FILEGROUP or FILE clauses to restrict the selection to include only online data. (Microsoft.SqlServer.Smo)
Please note we left the DataBaseA in the old SQL2000 server.
Please help on how we can delete the Full-text catalog from DatabaseB so we can do a backup
Many Thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 28, 2008
I am planning to move the sql server 2000 database to the sql server 2005 database. I have to restore that by using the back up copy. Do I need to follow any special instructions or just like moving from one server to another. Could some body help with this. Thanks!
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 17, 2004
Hi all
just a quick question for you. has anyone had any problems restoring a SQL7 database to a SQL server 2000?
is there anything special you have to do to get it working?
thanks for your time.
Andrew.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 23, 2006
I have a medical records system, SoapWare v4.90, that uses MSDE (SQL2000) databases. Due to the 2gb limitation, I am trying to migrate over to SQL 2005 (Standard or Express) which I have heard works fine. The SoapWare has a datamanager that allows me to log in to the MSDE instance, detach the SoapWare databases from msde (as well as do backups, etc) which I can confirm are detached.
Then I log back into a SQL2005 database instance using the datamanager and try to attach the database. This is what their pictured instructions demonstrate. However, I get the following error:
Database 'sw_charts' cannot be upgraded because it is read-only or has read-only files. Make the database or files writeable, and rerun recovery.
Of course, some of the entries will be read only, since doctors have to sign off the charts and are not allowed to subsequently change them. But I should still be able to switch over to sql 2005?!?!?!?
Or... is there a way to attach the databases to SQLExpress manually?
Help pls?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 25, 2007
Can anyone tell me why my SQL2000 database has grown aprox 15 % and my Log file 20,000 % when I attach it to SQL2005 .I've Thousands of Databases to Upgrade, but with the log file increasing to more than the size of the Database Its going to be a struggle !
It also takes a fair ammount of time to attach,
I suspect there is some reindexing going on , as when I try to reattach to SQL 2000 I get index errors ?
Is the re anything I can do in advance to reduce the database growth ?
I know I can truncate the log afterward but the peak diskspace consumed during my Migration may be an issue !
Thanks for any help
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 5, 2007
Hi
I have to migrate a SQL2000 database to SQL2005, I tried to use CopyDatabase Wizard (CDW) but invariably stopped all processes (may be for permissions, but I really I don€™t know) so I decided to detach de database, copy files to new server and attach it to SQL2005, it apparently works well, except for the fact that Schemas where created with the name of the users of SQL2000.
Is that correct?
Could it affect the performance or any other thing?
Is correct to do what I did?
Could be another problem in the recently attached database?
(Compatibility, data loss, corrupted structures, collation or something like that)
The server I am using is in a domain, it has windows server 2003 R2 SP2
@@Vesion returns
Microsoft SQL Server 2005 - 9.00.3042.00 (Intel X86)
Feb 9 2007 22:47:07
Copyright (c) 1988-2005 Microsoft Corporation
Standard Edition on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: Service Pack 2)
And in the source server with windows 2000 SP4
@@Vesion returns
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.194 (Intel X86)
Aug 6 2000 00:57:48
Copyright (c) 1988-2000 Microsoft Corporation
Enterprise Edition on Windows NT 5.0 (Build 2195: Service Pack 4)
Thank you in advance
Any comment will be greatly appreciated
JAPonce
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 7, 2007
Linked server from SQL2005 to SQL2000
Hi
I use the following SQL statements to create a link server. RemoteServerName is an SQL2000 and I am executing this in another machine which is SQL2005.
Though the link server is created successfully, I am not able to se the tables under it so could not query anything.
----
USE [master]
EXEC master.dbo.sp_addlinkedserver @server = N'RemoteServerNameInstanceName', @srvproduct=N'SQL Server'
EXEC master.dbo.sp_serveroption @server=N'RemoteServerNameInstanceName', @optname=N'collation compatible', @optvalue=N'false'
EXEC master.dbo.sp_serveroption @server=N'RemoteServerNameInstanceName', @optname=N'data access', @optvalue=N'true'
EXEC master.dbo.sp_serveroption @server=N'RemoteServerNameInstanceName', @optname=N'rpc',@optvalue=N'false'
EXEC master.dbo.sp_serveroption @server=N'RemoteServerNameInstanceName', @optname=N'rpc out', @optvalue=N'false'
EXEC master.dbo.sp_serveroption @server=N'RemoteServerNameInstanceName', @optname=N'connect timeout', @optvalue=N'0'
EXEC master.dbo.sp_serveroption @server=N'RemoteServerNameInstanceName', @optname=N'collation name', @optvalue=null
EXEC master.dbo.sp_serveroption @server=N'RemoteServerNameInstanceName', @optname=N'query timeout', @optvalue=N'0'
EXEC master.dbo.sp_serveroption @server=N'RemoteServerNameInstanceName', @optname=N'use remote collation', @optvalue=N'true'
EXEC master.dbo.sp_addlinkedsrvlogin @rmtsrvname = N'RemoteServerNameInstanceName', @locallogin = NULL , @useself = N'False', @rmtuser = N'remoteUser', @rmtpassword = N'remotePassword'
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 2, 2007
Hi,
I'd like to host a small website created using VS2005 EE with a company that offers just SQL2000 DB support.
My question, can i use the DB created by VS site manager as a DB to the site, if not, is there any alternatives.
Thanks.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 2, 2007
I have the follwoing scenario, where the query returns an error, when we tried to upgrade oru production SQL2000 enviroment to SQL2005.
SQL2000 Env:
Microsoft SQL Server Developer Edition
Microsoft Windows NT 5.2 (3790)
8.00.2175 SP4
SQL2005 Env:
Microsoft SQL Server Developer Edition
Microsoft Windows NT 5.2 (3790)
9.00.3054.00
Notice the removal of the two RTRIMs.
Any help welcome
Gertus
Current Connection was on the SQL2005 machine:
Remote Link Server SQL2000 SP4
Working:
SELECT * FROM Entity -- on SQL2005
WHERE
(EntityRef) + Source NOT IN
(SELECT (ENTITYID) + 'EU' FROM MRIEU.MRIOB.dbo.ENTITY) --this is on sql2000
AND Source = 'EU'
Not-working:
SELECT * FROM Entity-- on SQL2005
WHERE
RTRIM(EntityRef) + Source NOT IN
(SELECT RTRIM(ENTITYID) + 'EU' FROM MRIEU.MRIOB.dbo.ENTITY)
AND Source = 'EU'
Error :: >>
OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "MRIEU" returned message "Cannot create new connection because in manual or distributed transaction mode.".
Msg 7320, Level 16, State 2, Line 1
Cannot execute the query "SELECT TOP 1 1 FROM "MRIOB"."dbo"."ENTITY" "Tbl1005"" against OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "MRIEU".
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 29, 2006
i realise you can have both SQL2000 & SQL2005 Client software co-existing on one (developement) machine.
but i cant seem to find a definitive answer on whether i can install both complete databases on a server??
we are currently building a new development server and would like to install both version on it if possible??
Cheers,
Craig
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 27, 2005
I just upgraded my SQL 2000 server to SQL2005. I forked out all that money, and now it takes 4~5 seconds for a webpage to load. You can see for yourself. It's pathetic. When I ran SQL2000, i was getting instant results on any webpage. I can't find any tool to optimize the tables or databases. And when I used caused SQL Server to use 100% cpu and 500+MB of ram. I can't have this.Can anyone give me some tips as to why SQL 2005 is so slow?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 20, 2006
Are there any tips/techniques/issues when doing a begin tran and commit between a sql 2000 server/db and a sql 2005 server/db. Should you still use "set xact_abort on"? This will be a recordset of about 1-2000
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 14, 2007
I am runing Windows 2003 which has both SQL2000 and SQL2005.
The following works in 2000 but not 20005
Code Snippet
DECLARE @sql nvarchar(4000)
set @sql = 'sp_addlinkedserver @server = N''dbAccessPO'',
@provider = N''Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0'',
@srvproduct = N''OLE DB Provider for Jet'',
@datasrc = N''C:Temppopts.mdb'''
exec sp_executesql @sql
set @sql = 'sp_addlinkedsrvlogin ''dbAccessPO'', FALSE, ''sa'', ''Admin'', NULL'
exec sp_executesql @sql
Running this:
Code Snippetselect * from dbAccessPO...MyTable
Produces this error:
Code Snippet
OLE DB provider "Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0" for linked server "dbAccessPO" returned message "Unspecified error".
Msg 7303, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Cannot initialize the data source object of OLE DB provider "Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0" for linked server "dbAccessPO".
I login using sa for both instances.
I could really use your help.
Thanks.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 22, 2008
OK, I'm stumped and could do with some help. I have a laptop running Vista (64bit) with the SQL 2005 client tools. At home, I have SQL Server 2000 running on Windows Server 2003. I cannot get the SQL 2005 to talk to the SQL Server 2000. At work, we have SQL 2000 running on NT 5.0 and it connects fine. I also have a second laptop with SQL 2000 client tools running on XP SP2 which conects fine to the SQL 2000 instance on the 2003 box.
The vista laptop talks to the 2003 server, so it's not simpy that there is no connection. Any ideas why I keep getting an error stating that the Server might not be accepting remote connections every time I try to connect the Vista machine to the SQL 2000 server? I can't connect either from the SQL management tool, nor via ODBC.
Any ideas would be much appreciated.
View 24 Replies
View Related
Sep 17, 2006
i have sql2000 & sql2005 on the same machine. I am unable to register my localhost in sql2000, get an access denied error. How can I make my localhost use sql2000 database?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 4, 2006
Hi
I have new bought the SQL server 2005 enterprise, but it have 2 CDs, so what are the differences between CD1 and CD2? and so which one should i install first? or is it necessary to install both two or just need to install one of them?
And about my original sql 2000 database, can i just attach it's MDF file into the sql 2005 engine, or which import wizard can load the sql 2000 MDF into sql 2005? or do i need to keep the sql 2000 engine before do this?
thx
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 3, 2006
I can restore databases one by one, setting .mdf and .ldf destination paths.
How can I restore all my Databases at the same time?
Thanks
G. Zanghi
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jul 22, 2007
Hi all,
I just wonder can we install both sql2000 & sql2005
into one server, any problems?
thanks for advice.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 17, 2007
I have two SQL servers setup; A - SQL 2005, and B - SQL 2000.
I would like to create an account on Server A which has access to the results from one view via a linked server on Server B. I don't want the user on Server A to be able to access any databases, tables or even columns on Server B with the exception of those contained within this view.
Is this possible, and how would I go about doing it? (Permission-wise)
View 9 Replies
View Related
Nov 14, 2007
I have just loaded SQL2005(server only)on my production box.
This box also is running SQL2000.
When I install the SQL2005 SP2 it says that if services are locked they will cause a reboot. I stop all the SQL 2005 services but it also want to stop SQL2000 Server for "backward compatiblilty".
I thought installing a separate instance of SQL2005 would not have any effect on my SQL2000 instance.
Thanks for your help
R/P
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 4, 2008
Hello all
I have an odd problem with sql 2005. I'm a long time sql 2000 user trying to migrate to 2005. My company uses CSVs to import data from our clients db into our SQL db. In 2000 I just create a txt source and pick whichever CSV and transform to a temp sql table. This has always worked just fine with no problems.
So we have a new server with sql 2005 installed. I go through the "migrate dts 2000" wizard and pull in all my DTSs from sql 2000. The first thing I see that needs to be fixed is "connection 1" which is my CSV connection manager along with the flat file source.
I went through both the connection and the flat file source and tried to copy exactly what I do in sql 2000. When I preview the data or even execute this package I get bad data.
Here is what my CSV looks like:
"ACCT ","ACCOUNT DESCRIPTION ","ACCT TYPE","SCH NO","SC"
"9999Z","Balance By Source Offset",9
"87B","UTILITIES(NOT PHONE)U-C",7
72,"ADM-LEGAL/AUDIT/COLL EXP",7
315,"SALES TAX - VEHICLES LOCAL 1",3
"90A","INTEREST(NON FPLAN/MORT)/N-C",7
73,"MEALS & ENTERTAINMENT-ALL",7
"210A","REBATES RECEIVABLE",2,17,4
"5A@","# OF EXT WARR SALES-UC",10
"51N","N/C-VEHICLE INV MAINTENANCE",7
"87D","UTILITIES(NOT PHONE)SVC",7
"90B","INTEREST(NON FPLAN/MORT)U-C",7
317,"ACCRUED OTHER",3,75,4
This is what it looks like when I preview it inside the flat file connection manager:
ACCT ACCT DESC ACCT TYPE SCH NO SCTYPE
9999z blance by source... 9– – "87B" UTILITIES(NO... 7
So it is basically putting two rows of csv data into one row of SQL data. Now I realize my CSV isn't in the correct format because it doesn't have the extra commas at the end of a row IF the columns are null. It seems that 2005 doesn't recognize the carriage return/line feed. It puts the actual ascii characters in the preview. Once I execute the package it changes the ascii characters into blank spaces. My big issue is, why did this work just fine in 2000 but I can't get clean data in 2005? I'm completely clueless now, I have no idea where to go with this. Its impossible to change the output of the CSVs I get. There is literally no other options. I kinda get what I get with them. Why is this happening?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Nov 25, 2005
Any one knows if I can restore a SQL2000 database backup file on SQL2005? and the DB structure will be upgraded?
Many thanks.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2007
Hi,
Can a sever with OS win2003 install both sql2000 & sql2005? is there any problems with 2 differenct versions in one sever.
Thank you. :)
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 16, 2008
I have installed MSDE2000 (name: mypcsql2000, port 1433) and sql2005 Express (mypcsql2005, port 1434) on my WinXP.
I'm developing some application and I need to test both server.
It has worked fine about 1 year, but last month i got error message.
When i'm trying to connect to SQL2005 from my application or import data from Excel, i get error message:
[DBNETLIB][ConnectionOpen (Invalid Connection()).]Invalid connection.
I can access SQL2005 with Management Studio or cmd line (sqlcmd). But not with Excel (or with my application).
MSDE2000 works fine, i haven't any problems.
Last weekend I have reinstalled my WinXP and also MSDE2000, SQL2005 Express.
Worked fine, but when turn on automatic updates ON and afterwards installed latest updates, the problem is here again...
Any idea to solve this problem?
(sorry for my english...)
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 26, 2007
Hi,
Is there any difficulties I should be aware of? I'm not running DTS and I think my DB is relatively simple. I've googled and not found anything that sticks out as a problem.
We are getting a new server because we want more RAM, and better upgrade options. The hosting company recommended 64bit SQL, so I am thinking of following their recommendations.
I am upgrading from a 2 x p4 2.8ghz xeons to 1 x Intel 5130 dual core 64 bit chip. I also will be going from 2 gigs to 4 gigs of RAM.
Any thoughts I would love to hear.
Thanks!
View 8 Replies
View Related
Apr 19, 2006
Hello!!
we use SQL2000(64bit) and we are considering our system to apply SQL2005
so i tested two SQL-Server on One Machine by installing each instance of them.
The RESULT..
i can't find difference of performance between two instance.
is there no impoving in Database engine?
* i'm sorry, for my poor sentence...
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 11, 2007
I am a IT Manager.I have question:
There is a database was created on SQL Server.
I want to learn if I restore the database to SQL 2005 then I want to get backup then I want to restore to SQL 2000.
shortly: SQL 2000 sever-> SQL 2005->SQL 2000 SERVER
Can I do that?
If I do that is there someting missed?
http://www.narcv.com/
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 26, 2007
I have a distributor setup on SQL Server 2005 (9.0.3042) and am trying to create a publication on SQL Server 2000 (8.0.2040) which receives the following error in my production environment:
Msg 8526, Level 16, State 2, Procedure sp_addpublication, Line 802
Cannot go remote while the session is enlisted in a distributed transaction that has an active savepoint.
The interesting part of this equation is that I was able to get this to work without error in my DEV (development) environment and well as my QAT (test) environment. This end result was that my distributor was SQL 2005, my publisher was SQL 2000 and my pull subscriber was SQL 2005. I have been diligently comparing our production environment to my other environment and have yet to find differences.
Has anyone else seen an error similiar to this? Any insight would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Max
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 9, 2007
Hi,
I need to install SQL2000 onto a machine (W2K3 R2, SP2) that already has SQL2005, SP1 running. I can't disturb the SQL2005 installation.
Are there any problems or pitfalls to avoid? I've googled and looked on Technet but not yet found an answer.
Has anyone done this?
I know that if I install a separate instance of SQL2000 alongside a default installation of SQL2000 then I'll get a totally separate installation which won't affect the other one at all, so I reckon it could be done. But I have to be sure before I start!
Thanks in advance,
Steve
View 8 Replies
View Related
