Hi,
Is there a way to prevent new users from accessing a SQL2000 db (like to put it into DBO mode) while leaving current users finish their running jobs.
I tried Alter Database and sp_dboptions and both in SQL2000 requires to close all current users. It was working in SQL7 but not in 2000.
Thanks
AAA
Hi
Is it possible to restrict what IP numbers can access a sql server 2005 (can this do done in sql server 2005)?
Is there any way of not allowing users with MS Access from using it to connect to a SQL 7 server? Basically, no connection to SQL through MS Access should be allowed. Any ideas?
View 2 Replies View RelatedHello Everybody,
I need some help.
When we install the Database at the clients end, the client can see all
the SQL tables, views and stored procedure in the Enterprise Manager.
Is there a way via which you can restrict the client from viewing the
tables in SQL Enterprise manager?
I hope you understand my question.
I would be oblidged if my friends could help me...
Thanks
My users have sa rights to our SQL servers. I want to restrict their access to the C: so that they do not restore DB's there.
I thought at first I could create a Windows user that runs the SQL Service then grant them read rights to the C:. This does not give the user enough rights to start the service.
My users have sa rights to our SQL servers. I want to restrict their access to the C: so that they do not restore DB's there.
I thought I could create a Windows user that runs the SQL Service then grant them read rights to the C:. This does not give the user enough rights to start the service.
In SQL2005, is it possible to restrict incoming sql or windows authentication logins by source hostname or IP address? Perhaps using endpoints?
We are currently using hosts file on the db server as a temporary solution, but the SA will not allow us to use this as a permanent solution.
The app team I support is asking me to build an "idiot proof" database so that an Dev or Test app server they may configure, doesn't unintentionally connect to the Production database and damage/alter data.
Don't worry, I've already asked if they can't follow some kind of M&P's to prevent this kind of silly behavior, but they insist on DBA team creating a bullet-proof database that can outsmart app developers who try to attempt something dumb like this.
Any ideas or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
TIA,
Phil
Phil Streiff
Dear Gurus,
I need to do the following in SQL Server 2005:
1. Restrict access of user SA to my database
2. Encrypt contents of the whole database. Is there anything available in SQL Server 2005 (server or DB settings) which encrypt the contents. I do not want to explicitly encrypt individual columns !!
Thanks in advance
Anjum
We have a situation where we need to restrict access to a sql server data file. That is, to prevent users viewing any tables, stored procedures, etc, in sql server or another tool. We are providing a our database as part of an application install to a customer's site which will run isolated on the customers network. However the application will have sql server logins and the system must still be able to execute stored procedures.
The setup unfortunately cannot be changed and we are trying to think of best implementations for this. Our customers are also working with competitors so we are very conscious about exposing our data structures to anyone outside of our company, hence trying to restrict access. If deployed to a sql instance on the customer site then they will have database administrator accounts on the server.
Hi,
I have few SQL user who has permissions on different databases. When they are accessing MSSQL server from Enterprise Manager they can see all Databases but can not access them and they can change file size allocated to them. I want to restrict this and they can only see database belongs to respective user and restrict user to change allocated size. Please help me with this as I am not able to find the solution.
Thanks & Regards,
Gaurav
Hi,
I have added several Active Directory groups and set the system roles for each to "System User" and set one of the groups (DBAdmin) to "System Adminstrator"
My issue is that even after doing this, the users in the other groups are able to access the "Configure site-wide security" link under Security and change the permissions. The only system permission these users have is "View shared schedules" so it doesn't seem that this should be possible.
I would appreciate any feedback on this issue. Thanks!
I have a single database and 5 user which use this database for DDL and DML operations.
The problem we are facing here is, every time a user need to do some work in this database he/she had to ask(manually) to rest of the 4 users whether they are doing some task over the same DB or not. Sometime due to communication gap one user open any transaction which creates a deadlock for another user to execute any query over the same tables in this DBI want to get rid of this problem by making it configurable from SQL Server part so that if any user which is already accessing this DB, so the other user don't get access to it, kind of Mutually exclusive behavior.
How to do this.
Hi
I'm looking to deploy some SQL Server reports and I want to restrict the access that the users have. Currently when connecting to the reports site they have access to a lot of functionality through the header bar, for example
- Properties
- New Folder
- New Data Source
- My Subscriptions
- Site Settings
- Search
etc.
How can I disbale or hide all these options so that all the user sees is the list of reports?
Thanks in advance
Mark
When I access SQL2K using ODBC (linked table manager), I am not able to display any data. The columns show #Deleted as their data values. How do I display data in ACCESS from SQL2K tables?
View 18 Replies View RelatedHello AllI am using SQL server 2000 as the backend of my application but don'twant my clients tobe able to view or edit the database tables, storedprocedures , view etc using enterprise manager or query analyser (orsimilar tools)How can this be done ?I searched a lot for this but unable to get the correct answer isthere anybody to give full solution regarding this.Please relpy me as early as possible
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have two databases DB1 and DB2 DB1 has a source table named 'Source' I have created a login 'Test_user' in DB2 with Public access. I have also created a view named 'Test_view' in DB2 which references data from DB1.dbo.Source
How can I do the following: AS A Test_user
SELECT * FROM DB2.dbo.Test_view --Should work
SELECT * FROM DB1.dbo.Source --Should Not work
I have two databases DB1 and DB2 DB1 has a source table named 'Source' I have created a login 'Test_user' in DB2 with Public access. I have also created a view named 'Test_view' in DB2 which references data from DB1.dbo.Source
How can I do the following: AS A Test_user
SELECT * FROM DB2.dbo.Test_view --Should work
SELECT * FROM DB1.dbo.Source --Should Not work
The company for which I work did not have a DBA until I started a few weeks ago. Whoever installed SQL2K used the wrong CD so they have been running Personal Edition on their servers. I have installed a new SQL2K standard instance and have restored everything except the jobs and DTS packages. Can the msdb from the Personal edition be restored to the standard instance?
View 3 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to downgrade SQL from Enterprise to Standard Edition, or do you have to remove the previous installation (uninstall) and reinstall. Meaning you would also have to restore all user databases? Thanks.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am setting up the SQL2005 reporting service to let users build their own reports on the web. I'll provide them with pre-built report models. We have concern with SQL database performance by allowing users to execute huge reports. The problem that I have is: If I give the users permissions to build report they'll have access to the report's Properties | Execution page, which allows them to disable the report execution timeout. Is there a way for me to allow them build reports while restrict them to access the report execution timeout settings?
Please advise. Many thanks.
What would be the best practice to prevent users who didn't create a record in sql from deleting? When a record is created I have the username who created the record in one of the fields. I was thinking maybe a query?
Thank you in advance.
I have an ETL product, every 30 minutes it loads maybe a coupla 100K records of various construction into an SQL Server Db (2000 SP3, on Win 2000 Std Server also Win 2003 Ent Server). It really hammers the Db with a combination of batch insert update and insert fallback to update etc. It does not use 100% CPU actually and is IO bound. Works a treat.
Now the problem, someone has built a .Net ADO based front end, and for the 5 minutes my product runs every 30 minutes they have a hope in hell of getting a reasonable response for their select queries. Now my take is that maybe I can delay for 5ms after each transaction I do to allow the other user processes a chance. But better maybe would be for my ETL product Db user to have a lower priority than other Db users.
What is the best way to achieve this end? If I understood more about how SQL Server prioritizes users and their requests it might help. (round robin?)
Thx.
David
I have an ETL product, every 30 minutes it loads maybe a coupla 100K records of various construction into an SQL Server Db (2000 SP3, on Win 2000 Std Server also Win 2003 Ent Server). It really hammers the Db with a combination of batch insert update and insert fallback to update etc. It does not use 100% CPU actually and is IO bound. Works a treat.
Now the problem, someone has built a .Net ADO based front end, and for the 5 minutes my product runs every 30 minutes they have a hope in hell of getting a reasonable response for their select queries. Now my take is that maybe I can delay for 5ms after each transaction I do to allow the other user processes a chance. But better maybe would be for my ETL products user to have a lower priority than other users.
What is the best way to achieve this end? If I understood more about how SQL Server prioritizes users and their requests it might help. (round robin?)
Thx.
David
Hi guys, say i wrote a query that returns 1,000 records.. what kinda query could i write that only returns say the first 50 records of the 1,000 recs..
View 4 Replies View RelatedHi
I need to restrict delete from one table by any user of SQL. How can we do this? This is our master table and we dont want any one to delete data from this table.
Thanks
Bala
Is there a switch in 7.0 that I can set if
I don't want users to see a certain column in
a table.
Ex: TableA(column1, column2, column3)
If they do a select * from tableA
they will receive information on all three columns,
I don't want them to see the last column3.
Does anyone know how can we prevent users from creating offline/local cube (in Excel) from our OLAP/Analysis Service server ?
Thank you.
HiI have two SQL2000 servers in different sites, once a day approximately1M of data in the form of a large update is required to be transferedbetween the 2. We have use of a 2M pipe between the servers but thereis no quality of service, the other users on the pipe are traders sothere must be no interruption in the quality of their bandwidth at anytime.Is there any way of throttling back the data transfer between the twoservers to restrict its bandwidth use. Obviously we want to retain themax bandwidth on our local network.The pipe is administered by a seperate company so we do not have adminaccess to their gateways, routers etc.. so a solution which we canimplement on our database servers would be the easiest.I am not sure if this is the right newsgroup for this but anyinformation would be greatThanksMark
View 1 Replies View RelatedHello All,I'm using SQL Server 2000 and wish to restrict the user login to oneinstance only. Is this possible? Is this wise?
View 3 Replies View RelatedHello -I have over 100 MSSQL Databases on my SQL SERVER. How do I restrictall the MSSQL databases and its transaction logs to 100 MB.Can someone help me with any script which will do that.Thanks,Rubal Jainwww.Rubal.net
View 1 Replies View Related
Here is what I need to do, maybe someone could tell me what to do.
I need to create a login (I got that part) and then limit that login to only be able to see one of the databases on the server. So this is what I'm looking for.
user1 logs in to the server
user1 can only see the database I want them to see
and can not see anything else, no msdb, no tempdb, no security, no management etc.
I also need this user to be read only (only able to run select statements)
and this user will not be the owner of the database
Please help i'm pulling my hair out
Thanks Ahead of time
While web hosting I use Sql Server 2000 as the database. Imagine I have hosted 3 Web Sites. All these 3 users want to modify/update their designs. What I did is I created respective 3 users having access to the respective databases only. So that they can registerd the ip and add to the Sql Server 2000 Enterprise Manager. These users are able to access their own databases only. But all these 3 users are able to access the default databases like master,pubs etc. How to restrict this.
Also suggest which is the optimal way to give control to the respective users while using Sql Server 2000.
====Suresh, P.R, Postal Training Centre, Mysore.
Hi
Are there any way to use foreign key in MS-SQL Express with ON DELETE RESTRICT like other databases?
Best Regards
Igor Sane