Hi,
I have few SQL user who has permissions on different databases. When they are accessing MSSQL server from Enterprise Manager they can see all Databases but can not access them and they can change file size allocated to them. I want to restrict this and they can only see database belongs to respective user and restrict user to change allocated size. Please help me with this as I am not able to find the solution.
Thanks & Regards,
Gaurav
I have two databases DB1 and DB2 DB1 has a source table named 'Source' I have created a login 'Test_user' in DB2 with Public access. I have also created a view named 'Test_view' in DB2 which references data from DB1.dbo.Source
How can I do the following: AS A Test_user
SELECT * FROM DB2.dbo.Test_view --Should work
SELECT * FROM DB1.dbo.Source --Should Not work
I have two databases DB1 and DB2 DB1 has a source table named 'Source' I have created a login 'Test_user' in DB2 with Public access. I have also created a view named 'Test_view' in DB2 which references data from DB1.dbo.Source
How can I do the following: AS A Test_user
SELECT * FROM DB2.dbo.Test_view --Should work
SELECT * FROM DB1.dbo.Source --Should Not work
i need a sql statment or procedure to kill all user connection to one database.
And Deny new connection for a little time.
So i can a restore this database from a dump.
I can this do only in exclusiv modus. without any other connection.
Can anybody help me??
thanks and best regards from Berlin, Germany
Hi,
I'm using MsSql 2000 data base, how to enable and disable user in mssql 2000 version
Hello,
I am working on a couple fo the ASP.NET walkthoughs and I would like to practice with a Database that I created in Access. I realize that I could use the Access DB, but I would like to learn to work with a more industrial strength DB. Is there a method to export to MSSQL server 2000 from Access ?
Regards,
James
I have an ETL product, every 30 minutes it loads maybe a coupla 100K records of various construction into an SQL Server Db (2000 SP3, on Win 2000 Std Server also Win 2003 Ent Server). It really hammers the Db with a combination of batch insert update and insert fallback to update etc. It does not use 100% CPU actually and is IO bound. Works a treat.
Now the problem, someone has built a .Net ADO based front end, and for the 5 minutes my product runs every 30 minutes they have a hope in hell of getting a reasonable response for their select queries. Now my take is that maybe I can delay for 5ms after each transaction I do to allow the other user processes a chance. But better maybe would be for my ETL product Db user to have a lower priority than other Db users.
What is the best way to achieve this end? If I understood more about how SQL Server prioritizes users and their requests it might help. (round robin?)
Thx.
David
I have an ETL product, every 30 minutes it loads maybe a coupla 100K records of various construction into an SQL Server Db (2000 SP3, on Win 2000 Std Server also Win 2003 Ent Server). It really hammers the Db with a combination of batch insert update and insert fallback to update etc. It does not use 100% CPU actually and is IO bound. Works a treat.
Now the problem, someone has built a .Net ADO based front end, and for the 5 minutes my product runs every 30 minutes they have a hope in hell of getting a reasonable response for their select queries. Now my take is that maybe I can delay for 5ms after each transaction I do to allow the other user processes a chance. But better maybe would be for my ETL products user to have a lower priority than other users.
What is the best way to achieve this end? If I understood more about how SQL Server prioritizes users and their requests it might help. (round robin?)
Thx.
David
Is there a switch in 7.0 that I can set if
I don't want users to see a certain column in
a table.
Ex: TableA(column1, column2, column3)
If they do a select * from tableA
they will receive information on all three columns,
I don't want them to see the last column3.
Hi
Is it possible to restrict what IP numbers can access a sql server 2005 (can this do done in sql server 2005)?
I have created a user Finance and I want to grant him access only to see views which are created under Schema called "FinanceQuery".
Note: View may use tables from multiple schemas example: dbo. Staging. ect
By doing this, I want to achieve that this user Finance can see only Views created under Schema FinanceQuery and should not see any other objects (tables, Stored Procedures, Functions etc.)
Hi,
Is there a way to prevent new users from accessing a SQL2000 db (like to put it into DBO mode) while leaving current users finish their running jobs.
I tried Alter Database and sp_dboptions and both in SQL2000 requires to close all current users. It was working in SQL7 but not in 2000.
Thanks
AAA
Is there any way of not allowing users with MS Access from using it to connect to a SQL 7 server? Basically, no connection to SQL through MS Access should be allowed. Any ideas?
View 2 Replies View RelatedHello Everybody,
I need some help.
When we install the Database at the clients end, the client can see all
the SQL tables, views and stored procedure in the Enterprise Manager.
Is there a way via which you can restrict the client from viewing the
tables in SQL Enterprise manager?
I hope you understand my question.
I would be oblidged if my friends could help me...
Thanks
My users have sa rights to our SQL servers. I want to restrict their access to the C: so that they do not restore DB's there.
I thought at first I could create a Windows user that runs the SQL Service then grant them read rights to the C:. This does not give the user enough rights to start the service.
My users have sa rights to our SQL servers. I want to restrict their access to the C: so that they do not restore DB's there.
I thought I could create a Windows user that runs the SQL Service then grant them read rights to the C:. This does not give the user enough rights to start the service.
Hello
I have an MSSQL server where I would like to create a couple of databases, create one user pr. DB, and give them db_owner permissions.
Giving a user db_owner permissions allows the user to make a backup of the database, which is a good thing and I would like it to stay that way.
My problem is that I don't know how to restrict the user from saving the backup to any directory or filename that he wants to.
He can not get out of the directories that the user MSSQL is running under has access to. But he can overwrite another users backupfile or placing the file in the MSSQL-programfolder.
The users is using SQL Server authentication.
Can I restrict the backup procedure to save to only one file or in one directory?
What is the best practice regarding backup if you give your users db_owner permissions?
i am using sql server 2008R2 and i want to restrict my application user to view only the data(ships) related to him only.
We have database and many vessels with many owners, basically wants the owner could only view his owned vessels not the vessel owned by another owner.
I am using a SSAS cube as my data source for my reports. I have set up the roles on the cube and that works fine.
However, in my reports I want to be able to restrict the report filters based on the user that logs in.
E.G. we have a list of users from different countries. if a user from the US logs in then the country filter should have only USA in it. If a Japan user logs in then the country list should have only Japan.
Currently, the country filter still has all the countries but the logged in user can only get data for his country. I want that list to only be populated with user country only.
I think it has something to do with the dataset that is populating the country list but I have no idea as to how to fix it.
Any help will be appreciated.
We can restrict users from accessing the databases from the security. But is there anyway , we can restrict users from seeing the available databases on the server, user can access and see the database he or she has access to other databases will not be visible?
View 13 Replies View RelatedIn SQL2005, is it possible to restrict incoming sql or windows authentication logins by source hostname or IP address? Perhaps using endpoints?
We are currently using hosts file on the db server as a temporary solution, but the SA will not allow us to use this as a permanent solution.
The app team I support is asking me to build an "idiot proof" database so that an Dev or Test app server they may configure, doesn't unintentionally connect to the Production database and damage/alter data.
Don't worry, I've already asked if they can't follow some kind of M&P's to prevent this kind of silly behavior, but they insist on DBA team creating a bullet-proof database that can outsmart app developers who try to attempt something dumb like this.
Any ideas or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
TIA,
Phil
Phil Streiff
Dear Gurus,
I need to do the following in SQL Server 2005:
1. Restrict access of user SA to my database
2. Encrypt contents of the whole database. Is there anything available in SQL Server 2005 (server or DB settings) which encrypt the contents. I do not want to explicitly encrypt individual columns !!
Thanks in advance
Anjum
Dear Freinds..
I want to protect a field in a table...i want to restrict users to update the value in that field...by manually logging into that database...it can be updated only through the application...if any body manually update the field value....it has to be captured in log with old value....is it possible to do this sql server...if any of u says yes 'its possible' then :beer: other wise :eek:
I am designing wepage using Asp.net with Sql server as database. I have used Multiline textbox in which user has to enter their family detail. Like number of brother and sister family status, source of Earning for family.
But User do not have to enter his/her phone/contact number. For that I restricted the user to enter any nuberic digit through asp.net Regex. But User is too smart now they are entering his/her contact number in words.
Suppose somebody's Contact number is 533445928 as they can not enter numberic digit because of asp.net regex which allows the user to enter only alphabets. Now they are entering their contact number in words like five three three four four nine two eight seven. I would like to restrict the user to enter contact detail in words also.
Dear all,
I want to grant a user permissions to run Jobs in SQL Server 2000. I can' seem to find any appropriate roles for that. Do I need to assign him a server role? In that case, which? Many thanks.
Pedro Martins
We have a situation where we need to restrict access to a sql server data file. That is, to prevent users viewing any tables, stored procedures, etc, in sql server or another tool. We are providing a our database as part of an application install to a customer's site which will run isolated on the customers network. However the application will have sql server logins and the system must still be able to execute stored procedures.
The setup unfortunately cannot be changed and we are trying to think of best implementations for this. Our customers are also working with competitors so we are very conscious about exposing our data structures to anyone outside of our company, hence trying to restrict access. If deployed to a sql instance on the customer site then they will have database administrator accounts on the server.
Hi,
I have added several Active Directory groups and set the system roles for each to "System User" and set one of the groups (DBAdmin) to "System Adminstrator"
My issue is that even after doing this, the users in the other groups are able to access the "Configure site-wide security" link under Security and change the permissions. The only system permission these users have is "View shared schedules" so it doesn't seem that this should be possible.
I would appreciate any feedback on this issue. Thanks!
I have a single database and 5 user which use this database for DDL and DML operations.
The problem we are facing here is, every time a user need to do some work in this database he/she had to ask(manually) to rest of the 4 users whether they are doing some task over the same DB or not. Sometime due to communication gap one user open any transaction which creates a deadlock for another user to execute any query over the same tables in this DBI want to get rid of this problem by making it configurable from SQL Server part so that if any user which is already accessing this DB, so the other user don't get access to it, kind of Mutually exclusive behavior.
How to do this.
How to restrict a user do not connect sql server from command prompt.
I want to restrict my sql server do not connect from command prompt i.e providing server ip address and server credential.
How to secure my server data base do not connect from dos command.
I want to grant CREATE, ALTER, VIEW permission to user but not DML permission?
So user can create Object but can't drop and delete it or user cant insert , update,delete from table.
I have Given db_datareader,db_denydatawriter, and granted create, select, alter permission.
But user is able to drop.
Sorry.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI would like to password protect my MS Access Database which is being exported to from SQL 2000 using DTS, but when I password protect it, I get an error message stating "The workgroup information file is missing or opened exclusively by another user". The ACCESS file has to be opened exclusively to add password protection. Any suggestions?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi
I'm looking to deploy some SQL Server reports and I want to restrict the access that the users have. Currently when connecting to the reports site they have access to a lot of functionality through the header bar, for example
- Properties
- New Folder
- New Data Source
- My Subscriptions
- Site Settings
- Search
etc.
How can I disbale or hide all these options so that all the user sees is the list of reports?
Thanks in advance
Mark