Row Versioning In SQL 2000?

Sep 15, 2006

I replicate (transactional replication) my data entry database to a
read-only database. Both are SQL 2000+SP4. The web server reads the
read-only database. At times, there will be lots of changes in the data
entry database, thus lots of replications to the read-only database. I
am concerned that the replication may lock the data in the read-only
database, causing slow response to the web server.

I would like to use row versioning so that the read-only database can
supply old data when the same row is being written by replication. I
read that row versioning is a feature in SQL 2005. Is there any
versioning capability in SQL 2000?

Thanks

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Versioning

Jul 20, 2005

Dear friends,In the area of GIS (Geographic Information Systems) there is a featureknown as versioning (long transactions).This feature allows databases to maintain different versions of data,in a hierachycal structure, in order to do simulation (what if ...),historical snapshots, concurrent editing, etc.Each version can be reconciled with its parent version in any moment(merge-post changes).I have recently seen that Oracle supports this feature from version9i.I am very interested in knowing if SQL server will support thisfeature in future versions. Looking at SQL Server 2005 doc. I haven'tseen any related info.Thanks,Jerry

View 5 Replies View Related

DTS Versioning

Jun 12, 2007

I'm having problems to keep proper versioning control in place between the development and production environments. I'm running SQL2000 and we have hundreds of packages that runs daily. Some on shedules and some not.



Every time a package is saved, it creates a version in SQL Server. After development I want to be able to use something like "Visual Source Safe" and book the final version in that was moved into production. Something with a version number etc.



This is especially a problem if I want to roll back to a prior version of a package. I do not know which one of the 1000 versions to choose from that were created while developing the package.



Another problem is that I do not know if someone is working on a package if I want to work on it.



I can not run a search on all the packages to get a list of which tables/fields are used where to determine the impact of a program/database/design change that needs to be implemented.



Any suggestions would be helpfull.

View 1 Replies View Related

Database Versioning

Jul 13, 2000

I have a big delimma. We are developing and application that requires parallel work to be done one different copies of databases at the same time. Then when one when group is done and ready to ship their bug fixes/features, the changes they make to the database and data have to be merge back into the baseline database.

Here's the specifics. 4 databases (that make up the product), 4 copies of the 4 database (one for each team).

I was thinking about using SQL DMO to attach to each database and comare each table's schema and data against the baseline (the current release) then scripting out the changes that were made.

Can someone give me some tips on how to maintain parallel database development and the merge process that can make this happen?

Thanks,
Kurt

View 3 Replies View Related

Sdf Database Versioning

Feb 11, 2008



I have a question about how I should go about handling different database versions (schema changes) with my application. I am using an sdf database as a local data store (either on the .NET framework or Compact Framework).

I set it up so that the database file has the database schema, but no actual data, which is copied to the AppData folder if it isn't already there. The I load the database into the dataset, and can store data in the database with no problems.

What I want to figure out is what happens when I later decide to change the database schema. For example, say I add a column to a table. When I load the existing database into the dataset, I get an exception because the existing database doesn't have that column.

It seems that there should be some way to update the existing database so that it adds the column into the table, and sets the rows to just have NULL for that new column.

I am not sure if the TableAdapter or some other object should handle updating the existing database so it matches the latest dataset schema, or if I need to manually write SQL statements to modify the existing database.

Any help is appreciated.

Adam

View 2 Replies View Related

Report Versioning

Nov 16, 2007

I was wondering if anyone knows if there is a way to version a report, after changes have been made kind of like there is to an application. when changes are made to an app with a version # of say 4.0.1 you can changge to 4.0.1. Without using a program like SourceSafe. Thanks in advance for the speed responses.

View 5 Replies View Related

Database Versioning?

Sep 4, 2007

Hi,

Could someone point me in the right direction? I have an internal development database and a production database. Is there an easy way to replicate the changes that have been made to the development version on the production server without modifying the actual data in the tables? So, if I add a new user in my development version I offcourse don't want to see it pop up in the live version. But adding/deleting/updating a new table or column should.

And if possible I'd also like to know how you could do the following: Let's say we have an OrderDetail table containing information about the purchased product. Let's say I'd like to add a new column 'total' to skip calculation on the database every time I want to know the totals. It should be able to initialise the value by doing 'times ordered * price' for every existing row. Is that possible as well?


Srry for the noob questions

edit: Using MSSQL 2005

View 4 Replies View Related

Versioning - Deploy Just The Changes To The Server

Jan 8, 2008

At ScottGu's Blog about "Database Publishing Wizard", AlexD from codeplex said:
"Regarding the multiple requests for versioning, backup/restore of remote database, and selection of individual objects - these are all things we are actively looking at for our next release in the first half of 2007."
After so many searches, I still don't know if this tool performs Versioning, i.e, when deploying the database, just update de diferences between the local and server database.
Did Visual Studio Express 2008 have somethingh like that? (I know that VS Team Edition 2005 had).
If this tool can't make it (versioning), which tool/method did you recomend me?
Thanks in advance.
Alberto
 
 

View 1 Replies View Related

Stored Procedure Versioning Using VSS

Jun 15, 2005

Anybody using this feature?How To Add SQL Server 2000 Stored Procedures to Visual SourceSafe by Using Visual Studio .NETany comments?

View 5 Replies View Related

Versioning && History Question

Jun 22, 2005

I did a seach here and found some posts but none that answered my specific problem.I am a programmer tasked with building an application for generating Quote Proposals.  The database is for the most part fairly simple except when it comes to versioning and history.  Basiclly every quote can be revised and modified several times prior to making a final decision (final approved quote), so I need to keep track of the changes that occur durning the revision process.  I am not a DBA but I have had some database experience.  From what I can tell I have two choices a.) Duplicate all the data everytime the quote is revised.  While this method is does cause a lot of duplicate data it is very straitforward and easy to explain (or turnover to someone else) and reporting becomes very easy as well.Reporting....   this is my biggest area of concern as the users of the app should have the ability to print out the original quote proposals as well as the revised quote proposals.  Duplicating all the data makes reporting very easy.b.) Create a history table and record the original data (along with who and when) before recording the new value in the main table.  While this method does conserve disk space it make reporting a bit difficult as you would have to pull the specific value for a specific Quote Revision and display the orginal values on the report instead of the current ones.Table info:  I looking a 10 to 12 tables to record and store the data.  The largest table will have about 40 fields.  Current estimates are producing about 5 to 8 quotes per week.  Each quote is revised an average of 2 to 3 times.Are the pros and cons I listed the main ones to be concerned with and are there any other options?Thanks

View 1 Replies View Related

Service Pack Versioning

Mar 6, 2001

Does Anyone know if there is a way to verify the SQL Service Pack Version on 7.0? Thanks. Dallas

View 1 Replies View Related

Row Versioning, Audit, Best Practice

Mar 2, 2007

I have a small webapplication, sql server 2000. The users can only update the data in the system. However my client needs a report that display changes. The changes are that needs to be monitored are only change of order status, change of delivery date and when a user splits an order.

What is the best practice to keep track of changes? A mirror table for each table with changes?

/Magnus

View 3 Replies View Related

SSIS Versioning Control

Jun 7, 2006

Hi All,
I'm new on SSIS, but have worked for some time with DTS and a long time with other ETL tools like Informatica or OWB.

I would like to know in which way can i, easily, control my project/package versions. At the same time i need to implement a concurrency management system, which will control what developer is using which package, and when finished update the central repository (As it does Informatica or even OWB).

I have heard that i could implement versioning with source safe, but can i implement this in the way that i've referenced before. Can i use CVS?

Thanks,
VĂ­tor Ferreira

View 3 Replies View Related

Versioning SQL Server Stored Procedures With VSS?

Oct 19, 1999

Hi everyone,

Is versioning SQL Server 7.0 stored procedures with VSS possible? If so,
how? How are people versioning stored procedures out there?

Thanks in advance...
bth@prucka.com

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Deployment / Production Package Versioning

Jan 10, 2006

For the past few months I've been developing an DW and ETL with SQL
2005 / SSIS.  My packages are being deployed to a SQL
Server.  Although in the end game we will have a
Dev/Staging/Production environments, I would still like to archive
production packages when we push staging to production. 
Essentially I would like to archive the last X packages that were
deployed to production where X is a reasonable number (3 - 5).  I
don't necessarily need to have them accessible to run.  One of the
purposes is to have another safeguard should we miss anything in user
testing and need to roll back a deployment.



I am utilizing VSS and we will have backups running on the production
server, but I would prefer to have a archive that is a little more
accessible.



I just wondering if anyone has any thoughts on how to extract/archive
production packages when the push is made.  I could easily develop
an app that queries the MSDB and exports the packages to the file
system. 



Anyone have any thoughts?



Larry Pope

View 2 Replies View Related

Suggested Best Practices For Custom Component Versioning

Oct 23, 2007

Edited:Maybe I should have posted this to the "managed" newsgroup. If any admins think that would be better, then let me know. I don't want to duplicate unnecessarily.

Hi,

We developed a custom Control Flow task for SSIS (2005, not yet had a lot of time to look at 2008 yet) and found that it does not handle versioning, or an uninstall and the resulting lack of an addressable component very gracefully.

Here is a typical scenario:

Baseline

Install component MyCustomTask 1.0
Create Project
Save Project

Action 1

Uninstall MyCustomTask 1.0 and don't install the new version (a typical user scenario!)
Open Project
SSIS acts like the world has ended, especially if the user forgot to manually remove the item from the toolbox
Fix:None, obviously, but it would be nice to be a bit more graceful and informative.
Backdoor Toolbox fix: "Cleanse" the toolbox when it goes haywire by deleting the toolbox.tbd, in Documents and Settings<UserName>Local SettingsApplication DataMicrosoftVisualStudio8.0

Action 2

Uninstall MyCustomTask 1.0 cleanly, plus removing the toolbox item by hand.
Install MyCustomTask 1.1, with identical interfaces etc, and add the toolbox item by hand.
SSIS acts like the world has ended, and fails to ask you a sensible question like "do you want to upgrade the project to use the new version of the component"
Fix:Identify major and minor version component changes and throw the user a rope.
Backdoor Fix: Go into the DTSX manually - attack the DTSExecutable ExecutableType and DTS Name, for a Task in our case and replace it with the new version info. Even if the interface for the component has changed slightly, it seems to deal with that OK.

Given the fact that it seems to be very likely that there will need to be SSIS version specific builds of components (I am assuming that a task created in 2005 will not work with 2008), what is the best way to deal with the current lack of SSIS smarts.

Would this be the best approach:

Version the interfaces, but never the builds within a version i.e. My.CustomTask90 v1.0, My.CustomTask100 v1.0 etc.

This is a bit of a pain, rather than the simpler My.CustomTask v9.0 / v10.0 etc.

Or, are there some nice improvements in the pipe to alleviate this, plus perhaps even a way to programatically add components to the toolbox, rather than the low-rent method of getting the user to do it by hand.

All suggestions gratefully received.


Thanks in advance

Gareth

View 6 Replies View Related

Design To Accomodate Entity Based Schema Versioning

Jul 20, 2005

in simple words it's about versioning at record level.ExampleTableEmployee - EmployeeId, EmployeeName,EmployeeAddress, DepartmentId,TableDesignationMap - EmployeeId, DesignationId, EffectiveDate,validityTableDepartment - DepartmentId, DepartmentTableDesignation - DesignationId, designationVia Modify-Employee-Details screen following are editableEmoyeeNameEmployeeAddressDepartmentDesignationthis screen should allow user to navigate through changes history.Example :Version -1EmoyeeName John SmithEmployeeAddress 60 NewYorkDepartment AccountsDesignation AccountantVersion -2EmoyeeName John SmithEmployeeAddress 60 NewYorkDepartment AccountsDesignation Chief Accountant - changedVersion -3EmoyeeName John SmithEmployeeAddress 60 NewYorkDepartment Sales - changedDesignation Marketing Manager - changedQuestion :What is the best proposed database design for maintaining historyrecords bound with version and retrieval techniqueBest RegardsSasanka

View 1 Replies View Related

Locking In Read Committed With Row Versioning Isolation Level

Dec 27, 2007

I have a question on locking pattern of read committed with snapshot isolation level that when two transaction update two different records then why do they block to each other even if they have previous committed value (old version of record).

I executed the below batch from a query window in SSMS

--Session 1:
use adventureworks
create table marbles (id int primary key, color char(5))
insert marbles values(1, 'Black')
insert marbles values(2, 'White')
alter database adventureworks set read_committed_snapshot on
set transaction isolation level read committed
begin tran
update marbles set color = 'Black' where color = 'White'

--commit tran

Before committing the first transaction I executed below query from second query window in SSMS

--Session 2:
use adventureworks
set transaction isolation level read committed
begin tran
update marbles set color = 'White' where color = 'Black'
commit tran


Here the first session blocks to second session. These same transactions execute simultaneuosly in snapshot isolation level. So my question is why this blocking is required in read committed with snapshot isolation level?

Thanks & Regards,
Subhash Chandra

View 1 Replies View Related

DB File Size Limit With SQLServer 2000 In Small Business Server 2000

Mar 15, 2006

Thanks in advance. What is maximum SQL Server database (*.mdf) file size with SQL Server 2000 as part of Microsoft Small Business Server 2000? (Database files were limited to 10 GB in SBS 4.5 with SQLServer 7.0... has this changed?).

View 1 Replies View Related

Sql Server 2000 Developer Edition W/MSDE 2000 Release A Install

May 21, 2005

Can you install Sql Server 2000 Developer Edition with MSDE 2000 release A already installed?

View 2 Replies View Related

Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Desktop Engine (MSDE 2000) Release A

Feb 17, 2004

My objective is to use Enterprise Manager to move (copy) my SQL db from the server to my windows desktop computer.

I downloaded MSDE and am having trouble installing it, no doubt because I do not understand the documentaion (ReadMeMSDE2000A.htm).

When I try to run setup, I get that message that says:

"A strong SA password is required for security reasons. Please use SAPWD switch to supply the same."

Considering my purpose, do I need a "strong" SA password? If not, how do I get around it? If yes, how do I set it up?

I am a Mac user so I have poor windows skills, please make it as painless as possible for me, thanks!

Ron

View 3 Replies View Related

Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Desktop Engine (MSDE 2000) Release

Feb 16, 2006

venu writes "Hi,

Am very new to MS SQL adminstration
Can anybody help me out how to work on Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Desktop Engine (MSDE 2000) Release A just for the practice.

The activity which am going to workout on MSDE is below.

How to install SQL(on XP)
How the layout will be(like if i insall MSDE what are all Application will be and how they depends on each other)
How to create/delete tables if so, how can we do it either by GUI or CUI

just i need a clarifications reg same

Thank you,
venu"

View 1 Replies View Related

Performance Issues - Access 2000 Frontend SQL Server 2000 Backend

Jul 23, 2005

Hi,Simple question: A customer has an application using Access 2000frontend and SQL Server 2000 backend. Data connection is over ODBC.There are almost 250 concurrent users and is growing. Have theysqueezed everything out of Access? Should the move to a VB.Net frontendtaken place ages ago?CheersMike

View 4 Replies View Related

Vista Business ODBC/DSN To Remote Windows 2000 Server / SQL 2000

Oct 8, 2007

Hi,
Just upgraded some development desktops to Vista Business. However we need
to still connect to some older remote windows 2000/SQL 2000 servers.

Trying to setup an ODBC system DSN on our Vista Business local desktop we get the
following errors -

-START ERROR WINDOW-
Connection Failed:
SQLState: '01000'
SQL Server Error: 772
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][TCP/IP Sockets]ConnectionOpen
(SECDoClientHandshake()0.
Connection failed:
SQLState: '08001'
SQL Server Error: 18
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][TCP/IP Sockets]SSL Security Error
-END ERROR WINDOW-

Any help greatly appreciated as this is stopping us from making
database/table connections etc. We've checked the firewall setup and all is well there.

PS - we can still connect fine using XP or windows 2000 desktops and their
local DSNs.

View 8 Replies View Related

SQL 2005 Thinks A SQL 2000 Backup Is Corrupt, But SQL 2000 Restores Just Fine

Jul 19, 2007

I am attempting to move some SQL 2000 databases to SQL 2005. My main production database does not seem to want to move. When I use the SQL 2005 GUI the .bak backup file is marked 'Incomplete'. When I attempt to restore the backup file I get a 'RESTORE detected an error on page (0:0) in database' message. I saw a thread in the SQL Express forum suggesting trying to restore from the T-SQL level to get the GUI out of the picture and I get the same 'error on page (0:0)' message. However when I take the same file and use SQL 2000 Enterprise Manager it restores with no problems.

Any ideas?

Thanks
Mike Mattix

View 8 Replies View Related

Maximum Capacity Specifications Comparison Table For Access, SQL Server 7, 2000 And MSDE 2000

May 27, 2008











Parameter
Access 2000/XP
SQL Server 7.0
SQL Server 2000
MSDE 2000

Number of instances per server
n/a
n/a
16
16

Number of databases per instance / server
n/a
32,767
32,767
32,767

Number of objects per database
32,768
2,147,483,647
2,147,483,647
2,147,483,647

Number of users per database
n/a
16,379
16,379
16,379

Number of roles per database
n/a
16,367
16,367
16,367

Overall size of database (excluding logs)
2 GB
1,048,516 TB
1,048,516 TB
2 GB

Number of columns per table
255
1024
1024
1024

Number of rows per table
limited by storage
limited by storage
limited by storage
limited by storage

Number of bytes per row





(Excluding TEXT/MEMO/IMAGE/OLE)
2 KB
8 KB
8 KB
8 KB

Number of columns per query
255
4,096
4,096
4,096

Number of tables per query
32
256
256
256

Size of procedure / query
64 KB
250 MB
250 MB
250 MB

Number of input params per procedure / query
199
1,024
2,100
2,100

Size of SQL statement / batch
64 KB
64 KB
64 KB
64 KB

Depth of subquery nesting
50
32
32
32

Number of indexes per table
32
250 (1 clustered)
250 (1 clustered)
250 (1 clustered)

Number of columns per index
10
16
16
16

Number of characters per object name
64
128
128
128

Number of concurrent user connections
255
32,767
32,767
5

View 1 Replies View Related

Bit-data From SQL Server 2000 (2005 Working, 2000 Doesn't)

May 19, 2008

 Hi, I am trying to edit some data from a SQL2000-datasource in ASP.NET 2.0 and have a problem with a column that has bit-data and is used for selection. SQL2005 works fine when declaring             <SelectParameters>                <asp:Parameter DefaultValue="TRUE" Name="APL" Type="boolean" />            </SelectParameters>When running this code with SQL2000, there are no error-msgs, but after editing a record the "APL"-column looses its value of 1 and is set to 0. Looks like an issue with type-conversion, we've hit incompatibilities between SQL200 and 2005 with bit/boolean several times before. So, how is this done correctly with SQL2000?  (I've tried setting the Type to "int16" -> err. Also setting Defval="1" gave an err) ThanksMichael   

View 2 Replies View Related

Listing Users In A Winwos 2000 Group For Sqlserver 2000

Jan 25, 2005

Hi, I wanted to see what are all the users in a windows nt group that has a group access to sql server 2000. I have a windows 2000 group access to sqlserver 2000 as "xxxsomegroup". How can I list all users that belongs to this windows 200 group? is there any stored procedure to find out this?
any information could be greatly appreciated.

thanks

View 1 Replies View Related

Reconnecting Access 2000 Front End To New Instance Of SQLServer 2000

Jul 27, 2004

I recently had to reinstall a new instance of SQLServer 2000, but was unable to use the previous server name. As a result, my Access2000 front end is not happy with it's linked tables. I can't seem to find anyplace within Access to universally change the address of the SQLServer used as the back-end for all linked tables.

When I do try to access the linked tables through Access, I get an error, and the option to change the server location. When I try to type-in the new SQLServer location, there is an attempt to reconnect to SQLServer, but a whole lot of errors are generated, and none of the data is transferred into the Access table.

I really don't want to have to re-do my Access front end, so it seems it would be easiest to somehow reinstall SQLServer to have the same server location it used to. Is there a good way to completely erase all traces of SQLServer so that I can have better luck reinstalling it to the same location it used to be in? Just using the uninstall program from SQLServer doesn't seem to be cutting it.

Thanks!

View 1 Replies View Related

Problem Using Access 2000 As A Front-end To SQL Server 2000 Tables

Jul 23, 2005

I've created a small company database where the tables reside in a SQLServer database. I'm using Access 2000 forms for a front end.I've got a System DSN set-up to SQL Server and am using links withinAccess 2000 to get to the SQL Server tables.My forms worked fine until I made a few minor changes to the databaseschema on SQL Server (e.g. added a foreign key, or added a column).After that, all the links break - I click on a table link and get anerror msg like "invalid object name."Deleting the links after a schema change and re-adding the links seemedto fix the problem. The forms I'd already created seemed to work fineafter re-creating the links.But then I got more advanced with my forms. I have it set up so thatfor certain entry fields, the combobox gets populated with values froma table (the description appears in the drop-down and the correspondingprimary key value gets populated in the table). I created a number offorms using this technique, entered data, and everything worked fine.Made a small schema change and it broke everything -- not the actualtable links, but the functionality for the drop-downs. My values nolonger appeared, and this was true for forms that accessed tables whoseschemas did not change.This is driving me nuts. Is there any way to keep my forms frombreaking each time I make a small schema change?Thanks.- Dana

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2000 Installation Problem On Windows 2000 Professional

Jul 20, 2005

Hello,I received the error message below when i'm trying to install SQLServer 2000 standard edition into a Windows 2000 Professionaleworkstation.Error :Microsoft SQL server 2000 Standard Edition server components is notsupported on this operating system. Only client components will beavailable for installation.Any request modification ?Best regards,Thanks

View 1 Replies View Related

Windows 2000 Sp4 &&amp; SQL Server 2000 Causes Java Core Dump

Sep 7, 2007

I've just started getting this EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION (0xc0000005) on machines using Windows 2000 sp4 connecting to SQLServer. This is crashing JVMs (multiple Sun versions and BEA also) in the Java VM frame (outside our code). This has just started recently - perhaps with the last set of patches? Has anyone else seen this or know what I could do to get more information? Could this be related to updates to named pipes?

Thanks!

-Brian Temple

View 5 Replies View Related

Access 2000 Frontend MS SQL 2000 Backend - Locking Problems

Aug 20, 2007

We are using an Access 2000 project to view our SQL Tables and using Access 2000 Runtime to Access the forms in the project. We have written in a locking system in VB and removed the video controls to prevent users from accessing the same records. But of course now we need to make the video controls available. This has now thrown up the problem of multiple users accessing the same records. We have tried to write code to lock records when then video controls are used but this is not working as well as we hoped. Can anyone please suggest any way of setting up locking on SQL using triggers from the Access frontend? or any other types of locking systems that could be written in the Access front end.

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved