SQL 2000 SP4 On Win2K3 Cluster

Feb 20, 2008

Hey there I am an SQL noob, our bank has no real SQL Admin, we had onw that left but never had a good knowledge transfer. We have 2 SQL servers clustered. IBSQL1 and IBSQL2 they make up cluster IBSQL. We have 2 other servers IBIIS1 ans IBIIS2 and we noticed when installing apps on them that they could not see the database. Yet it can ping IBSQL. The problem is on IBSQL1 and 2 port 1433 is not listening or open. Thus on IBSQL it isn't either of course. I have read of all kinds of people having this issue and most have said you need to manually add a connection string "Provider=sqloledb;Data Source=machineName,1433;Initial Catalog=xx;User ID=xx;Password=xx" Problem is I do not know how to add a connection string.

I need step by step instructions since im new to this. Start/programs/etc..... Apparently it is not enough to open the properties of tcp/ip in the config util and say 1433. You need to reenforce it by adding that string.

As it stands I cannot "telnet ibsql 1433" it tells me to take a hike basically.

So is the connection string the likely cause? or could it be something simpler? Thanks in advance.

View 20 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

SQL 2000 On Win2k3 Enterprise?

Aug 30, 2006

I am attempting to install MS SQL 2000 SP2 on a Windows Server 2003 Enterprise SP1 box. The only installer I can find on the disc is in the MSDE directory and when I run it it immediately gives me this error:



"This installation package could not be opened. Verify that the package exists and that you can access it, or contact the application vendor to verify that this is a valid Windows Installer package."



I have tried copying the install files to my local hard drive for install, I have checked the version of my Windows Installer (3.1.4000.1840). I have the SP4 updates ready to go once it's installed, but I just cannot get past that point. I know that the same software version has been installed on other Windows 2003 systems, so why would it have a problem on this one machine?









Thanks

View 2 Replies View Related

How To Transfer Or Migrate From Old SQL Cluster 2000 To New SQL Cluster 2000

Jul 4, 2007



I have two Windows 2000 servers (Advance Edition) to form a Windows Cluster. I also install MS SQL 2000 Enterprise Edition on the cluster to form a MS SQL cluster. Now, I want to upgrade the hardware and OS (but keep on using SQL 2000), so I install Windows 2003 server Enterprise Edition on two new servers to form a new Windows Cluster. I am planing to install MS SQL 2000 Enterprise Edition on the new cluster, so the old SQL cluster and new SQL cluster are side by side. I would like to know how to setup a new SQL cluster (I know it has problem to rename SQL Cluster name, so how to fix this problem)? And how to transfer everything (such as system databases, users database, sql user account, password and maintenance plan jobs etc) from old SQL cluster to new SQL cluster? And how to switch over from old SQL cluster to new SQL cluster?



Thanks a lot !

View 8 Replies View Related

How To Set-up Sql Server 2000 In Win2k3 Server To Store Big-5 Chinese Data

Jul 23, 2005

I am using Windows 2003 Server English Version. I wanna store the big-5data so I install the sql server 2000 as if i install it in the Windows2000 with Server Collation of the Chinese_Taiwan_Stroke_CL_AS.However, the data are stored into the database server in unicodeinstead of big-5 in that of windows 2000 OS.I would like to ask how i can set so that the Sql Server 2000 can storethe big-5 data

View 6 Replies View Related

How To Upgrade SQL Server 2000 Cluster To SQL Server 2005 Cluster(Database)

May 8, 2007

Hi



We are planning to upgrade the SQL Server in our production environment from SQL Server 2000 to SQL Server 2005. This is a 4 Node cluster environment with 3 Databases on 3 Virtual instances. The main requirement is to achieve this with no/minimal downtime.



Could you please suggest or direct me to any documentation for the best practices used to upgrade such an environment?



Thanks

Priyanka

View 2 Replies View Related

Upgrading A SQL Server 2000 Cluster To A SQL Server 2005 Cluster

Dec 28, 2007



We're upgrading a SQL Server 2000 cluster (Active/Passive) running on Windows 2000 Server to a SQL Server 2005 Cluster running on Windows Server 2003. We can't purchase new hardware and we have no spare hardware. We also need to move from Windows 2000 Server to Windows 2003 Server at the same time. We want to keep downtime to a bare minimum.

What we were thinking was the following steps... Anyone try this?

1. Break the link between the servers.

2. Install a fresh copy of windows 2003 server on one side along with SQL Server 2005. While this step is running, the active node would still be live on Windows 2000 Server and SQL Server 2000 serving our customers.

3. Restore a copy of a backup from the active production side to the node we're upgrading and at that point we would bring the active node down, switching the active node to be the newly upgraded server.

4. As a final step, the old active node would now have the link to it broken, we would install a fresh copy of windows 2003 server on it and sql server 2005. At this point we would bring it back into the cluster and the cluster would be complete again.

Thoughts?

View 2 Replies View Related

Upgrading SQL Server 2000 Cluster To SQL Server 2005 Cluster

May 14, 2008



Friends -

Need your help and guidence for doing upgrading SQL Server 2000 Cluster to SQL Server 2005 Cluster.

Let me explain my current environment.

1. Currently SQL Server 2000 Cluster environment is running on Windows 2000 Server we need to upgrade this to SQL Server 2005 on Windows 2003 Server. >>> Production environment.


My Plans:

1. On Testing Environment Install SQL Server 2000 cluster on Windows 2003 Server and do a restore of databases from the produciton environment.

2. Upgrade In-Place from SQL Server 2000 Cluster to SQL Server 2005 Cluster.

My doubts

1. Can i install SQL Server 2000 Cluster on Windows 2003 Server. Is it possible or not.

Please advise me and correct my steps.

Cheers
VSH

View 1 Replies View Related

Win2k3 Sp2 And Sql Server 2k

Sep 19, 2007

I have a win2k3 server that i am going to need to upgrade to servicepack 2. It is running sql server 2000(sem reports version 8.0 - ithink that is sql server 2000). It has profiler and query analyzerrunning as well. Are there any caveats i need to be concerned aboutbefore installing win2k3 sp2 on a server with sql server 2000. Thanks

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL 2000 Cluster On Windows 2000

Jul 25, 2001

Hi,

I have setup a SQL 2000 cluster and the cluster works fine. I have given the SQl cluster a virtual IP address too.

I am unable to connect to the Cluster from a remote machine, using SQL Enterprise Manager or SQL Query Analyzer.

But I could connect to it from the machines involved in the CLuster.

Someone plese show some direction on this.

Thanks,
Manoj

View 2 Replies View Related

Clustering SQL2000 On Win2k3

Nov 1, 2005

Does anyone know where to find a comprehensive step by step build document for clustering SQL2000 on win2k3

View 3 Replies View Related

Win2k3 R2 EE + SQL2k5 EE And 16GB RAM

Mar 27, 2008

For a SQL/2005 DB Server do I need the /3GB switch or not? I will have IIS running on the server; however, it won't be doing very much as the SQL Database is the main thing:

Windows 2003 R2 Enterprise w/16 GIG RAM 4 CPU (Virtual Machine)
SQL/2005 Enterprise Edition

Hardware: Dell Server 8 CPU w/32 GIG RAM running VM ESX V3

I know I need the /PAE switch to utilize Memory over 4 GB - the question is do I need the /3GB switch along with the /PAE switch?

DeWayne

View 1 Replies View Related

MSDE And SQL2000 On Win2k3

Jul 23, 2005

Hi all,I have MSDE installed on an HP server as some of the utilities requireda database. I have also subsequently installed SQL 2000 onto thisserver which is a windows 2003 box. I know it complains at the startof the installation but I was under the impression that it would stillwork ok, especially with SP3 applied.I have tried to apply SP3 but it tells me that it is not a SQL2000instance ad setup will exit?Also I have noticed that in the directory structure it has used thedollar sign i.e. mssql$machinename its the same in Enterprise Manager\machinename$InstanceName. Whats that all about? Its not like that onany other server!My plan is to uninstall sql 2k, uninstall HP apps and MSDE andreinstall SQL 2k. Can anyone explain the above though?ThanksGary

View 2 Replies View Related

Install SS 2005 On Win2k3 ENT Or STD, Which Is Better??

Mar 22, 2007

We are planning a SQL Server 2005 install on VMware ESX, as thebackend to a Sharepoint Services 3.0 web front end..Do I gain anything at all by installing SS 2005 on Win2k3 ENTERPRISEas the OS instead of Standard??Thank you, Tom

View 1 Replies View Related

Performance Problems With SQL2K SP4 On Win2K3 SP2

Jan 7, 2008

Hello All and Happy New Year (I believe that is still allowed by the PC police?!)

Has anyone experienced performance problems (i.e. processes taking a lot longer to connect to the database server) after appyling Windows Server 2003 SP2 to a server that was previously running Windows Server 2003 RTM? The version of SQL Server (2000 SP4) has not changed between OS Service Packs.

To set the scene, we upgraded one node of a cluster to Win2K3 SP2 intending to upgrade the other node the following night if no problems were encountered. However, after failing over to the patched node we experienced something akin to a Denial Of Service attack whereby connections were gradually refused until even existing connections were kicked out.

We resolved that issue by disabling the SynAttackProtect Registry key (details http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;899599), but although connections are no longer being refused they are taking a lot longer, e.g. opening a Query Analyzer window now takes several seconds to connect to the database. The actual time taken by the database engine to execute sql queries has not increased, but is perceived by the users as having done so because of the time taken to return results.

I asked our server team to run diagnostics against both nodes and they found no problems and no differences apart from the OS service pack level.

I am about to reopen the case I logged with Microsoft, but thought I'd see if you guys had experienced anything similar.

Thanks and regards
Lempster :confused:

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL2K WIN2K3 CONNECTION SECURITY

Jul 23, 2005

Microsoft Security Paradigmes are Irritating. I sure they're fine onceyou know what they are, but for the uninitiated it's quitecounterintuitive to work with.I moving an old SQL Server-backend-IIS5/ASP-frontend application toservers with windows 2003 standard edition. One server will run thedatabase the other will run IIS 6.0. Note that i haven't set-up adomain, which i think requires one machine to be domain controllerwhich would decrease performance and stuff. I've simply put them on thesame group.I wan't to restrict access the sql server so only the incommingconnection from the webserver is allowed. I can use either namedpipes(which should be the fastest protocol) or tcpwhich should beslight slower than named pipes) but i seem to have a problem. If I usenamed pipes to connect the IUSR(the user under which IIS is running)must have access-rights to IPC$ share on the sql server. I can't seemto set any access-right directly for IPC$ share, but i can reactivatemy guest user and then it works, everyone can now access the ipc$ shareso it's not really what i'm looking for.I can also connect through TCP( and set up some kind of filter onlyallowing incomming connections on port 1433 from the ip of the webserver.But i don't know how to do this. I've taken a look at the IPSec stuffbut it's all about kerberos authentication and other bull which i don'tthink i need. What i need is simply a ip traffick filter, which doesnothing else but reject incomming connection from all other ip's thanmy webserver.My question is how do I do this? Do i need to have a addtitíon"firewall" service running and if so why, how much extra overhead willthis create for the server. Alternately, is it possible to change theaccess right for the IPC$ share manually?Thanks in advance for any input you might have on this?Regs Jens

View 2 Replies View Related

Impact Of Capicom.dll In WIN2K3 OS Upgrade

May 13, 2008



Hi,

I am currently working on with the ASP encryption of my application. I've tried to test the encryption of the connection string using the capicom.dll in my local, and it works successfully. However, I am not quite sure if this will still work after my OS is upgraded to WIN2K3 (my current OS is WINXP). Will this dll component be impacted after the OS Upgrade? or will there be no impact at all?

Any inputs from you guys would be much appreciated.

Thank you.

View 1 Replies View Related

Step By Step For Upgrading SQL Server 2000 Cluster To SQL Server 2005 Cluster

May 15, 2008



Friends -

Could any one of you provide steps for upgrading SQL Server 2000 cluster to SQL server 2005 cluster.

My environment is Windows 2003 server.

Appreciate your support.

Cheers
VSH

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL 7 And SQL 2000 On Same Cluster????

Sep 26, 2000

Hi everybody,

I have the cluster configuration on Windows2000 Advance Server.
Is it’s possible to install Active–Passive configuration for SQL 7.0 Enterprise edition AND Active–Active configuration for SQL Server 2000 Enterprise edition on the SAME Cluster server? If it's will be work together?

Thank you in advance,
Miriam

View 6 Replies View Related

Cluster And Sql 2000 Sp4

Aug 25, 2006

I have heard there were problems whne applying sql sp4 to clusters on sql 2000, has anyone encountered this? problem is we are getting
Error: 17883, Severity: 1, State: 0
which the cure is to apply this service pack sql 4 for sql 2000

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL 2000 SP4 On A Cluster

Aug 16, 2007

If I have SQL Server 2000 ENT edition on a cluster active/passive. Do I need to apply the service pack on the active instance, and then bring up other instance and reapply? While I am at it, I believe I still have to apply the hotfix for the awe memory problem also?

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL Cluster 2000

May 14, 2001

I am installing sql cluster on Windows Datacenter, but I get the following error. "setup failed to perform required operations on the cluster nodes".

when I looked at the cluster log file, it has has the following error:

"Installation of the Microsoft Data Access Components package failed. (-1)"

does anyone know how to fix ths error.

Thank You,
john

View 2 Replies View Related

Upgrading SQL 7 Cluster TO SQL 2000 ?

Mar 30, 2004

I am currently running an active/passive cluster NT4 with SQL7 clustered. I am trying to upgrade SQL to a clustered 2000 version. I have a san disk area allocated as a Z: drive. These are the following steps I have taken:
1. Used cluster wizard to uncluster the SQL 7 instance.
2. Using the SQL 2000 Enterprise cd created a new virtual server (with the same IP address and name as the previous SQL 7 server) I have left the install as a default instance.
3. Part way through the install I am asked to browse to the data area. The data area is Z:mssql7data.
On completion of the install I now have the following data path Z:mssql7datamssqldata and all the databases are still SQL7 databases.
My questions are:

How can I get the install to update/convert the databases to SQL 2000 as it doesnt seem to recognise them?

Will the install always suffix the data path with mssqldata

Any assistance appreciated.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cluster Sql Server 2000

Jul 20, 2005

Hi,I need manuals, tecnical papres, instalation guide, etc abouthow to install one cluster sql server 2000 64 bits withwindows server 2003.It`s posible a need one document step by step about thisThanks,RaulGZ.

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL 2000 And 2005 On The Same Cluster

May 26, 2006

We wish to upgrade our hardware of two sql boxes onto a single cluster. One of our databases will not run on sql 2005 and so I wanted to know if it is possible to run an instance of sql2000 and an instance of sql 2005 on the same cluster.

This is possible or would it cause as a lot of problems?

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL 2000 Cluster Memory Settings

Jan 31, 2008

I have an Active/Active/Passive cluster with 64GB RAM on each node running SQL 2000 EE, AWE is enabled as well as the PAE switch, all is dandy with that.

Question:
Should I configure each SQL Instance to have only a max mem usage of 32GB in the event both failover to the same node ? or will the memory allocation be handled without any issue if each node is configured to use 64GB ?

Thanks.

View 3 Replies View Related

Upgrade SQL 2000 To 2005 Cluster

Sep 17, 2007

Good Morning!
I am beginning the process of moving SQL 2000 databases to SQL 2005 cluster.
Has anyone already did this and is there anything I should know?
We plan on leaving the SQL 2000 database up during this process and granting read only at the time.
I am nervous about this as this is a high profile database in our dept.
I don't even know if I know where to begin!
Any suggestions are truely welcome!
Thanks,
/P

View 3 Replies View Related

MS SQL 2000 And Windows 2003 Cluster

Jul 20, 2005

I installed MS SQL 2000 on a Windows 2003 server cluster (no servicepacks). Both nodes are online and both domain controllers are online.I tried to install SP3 and got the following error:--------------Logon Account could not be validated.No authority could be contacted for authentication.---------------I installed SQL SP 2 and did not get the error but I do get it everytime I try to install SP3.Does anybody have an idea that might help resolve the problem.

View 2 Replies View Related

Is This Cluster Configuration Possible In SQL Server 2000?

Jan 29, 2008

Hi, could someone tell me if this configuration is possible?

Machine A: Instance 1 (ACTIVE) + Instance 2 (passive) + Instance 3 (pasive)
Machine B: Instance 1 (passive) + Instance 2 (ACTIVE) + Instance 3 (pasive)
Machine C: Instance 1 (passive) + Instance 2 (passive) + Instance 3 (ACTIVE)

I know that it is possible with 2 machines with the clasical solution of Machine1: active-passive, Machine2: passive-active, this way if one of the machines goes down the other one will take the job of both instances, but I dont know if this solution is possible in SQL server 2000 with 3 instances at the same time.

Help please? thanks

View 3 Replies View Related

Upgrading SQL Server 2000 SP3 To SP4 - In A SQL Cluster

Mar 26, 2008



We have 2 SQL servers in a failover cluster environment. SQL1 and SQL2. Currently SQL1 is the primary in the cluster, and we need to upgrade from Service Pack 3 to Service Pack 4.

Our setup:

Both servers are Windows 2003 Server Enterprise Edition.
Both servers have SQL Server 2000 Service Pack 3.

My question is:

Which upgrade plan do I take? Do I:

1. Upgrade the backup (offline) server in the cluster (SQL2) first, reboot, then failover from SQL1 to SQL2? Then do the other server?

2. Upgrade the primary (online) server in the cluster (SQL1) first and see if it replicates to the backup?

Any advice or tips would be most appreciated.

Thanks.

View 6 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2000 Cluster Upgrade

Apr 2, 2008

We're upgrading a SQL Server 2000 cluster (Active/Passive) running on Windows 2003 Server 32 - bit Standard to a SQL Server 2005 Cluster running on Windows Server 2003 64-bit Enterprise. Our existent cluster's databases are residing on SAN. We can't purchase new hardware and we have no spare hardware. We also need to move from Windows 2003 32-bit Server to Windows 2003 64-bit Enterprise Server at the same time. We want to keep downtime to a bare minimum.

What we were thinking was the following steps... Anyone try this?

1. Break the link between the servers. Or should we just evict the passive node?

2. Install a fresh copy of windows 2003 64-bit server on one side along with SQL Server 2005. While this step is running, the active node would still be live on Windows 2003 32-bit Server and SQL Server 2000 serving our customers.

3. Bring the active server down.

4. Create new cluster on the newly upgraded server and assign the same cluster name and IP as the original one.

5 Bring the luns from SAN to the newly upgraded server and initialize SQL Upgrade

6. As a final step, the old active node will be rebuilt, we would install a fresh copy of windows 2003 64 - bit server on it and sql server 2005. At this point we would bring it back into the cluster and the cluster would be complete again.

Thoughts?

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL 2000 Enterprise Cluster - Use NT Fibers?

Aug 3, 2007

We are running a two-node cluster for SQL Server 2000 Enterprise on Windows Server 2003. Each node has four processors and 4GB RAM. Our application is hosted on a seperate IIS server with 150-200 connections accessing the database via ADO.NET (ASP.NET 1.1). Our processor utilization has been high, averaging around 80% and out context switches/sec counter averages around 15,000. We are not using NT Fibers and our performance seems to be sluggish when the context switches/sec counter is high - over 10,000. In peak periods we se this counter hit 30-50,000. I have read articles that state NT Fibers have better performance in machines with 8 or more processors. Is this something that would also help in a four processor machine? The SQL Server is dedicated to SQL, i.e. there are no other applications running. I am also considering using the "Priority Boost" option... do these options really improve performance? I'm trying to squeeze as much performance out of these machines while waiting for new hardware to arrive. Thanks.

View 4 Replies View Related

Sql 2000 And Sql 2005 Instances On Same Cluster

Jan 17, 2008

Hi

I have a cluster with 4 sql server 2000 instances and would like to upgrade 2 of these to sql server 2005 - is there any document or list of things to ensure I do

Thanks

View 3 Replies View Related

Moving SQL Server 2000 Instances To A Cluster

Dec 10, 2006

Hi,

We have a new failover cluster (Windows 2003 SP1, Microsoft SQL 2000 SP4) with each node of the cluster hosting 7 SQL Server instances in a 2-node active-active configuration connected to a SAN. We are planning to move some SQL Server Instances(from existing stand-alone servers) into this Cluster. Any insight into the process of moving SQL Servers into the cluster would be highly appreciated.

Best Regards,
Himansu

View 4 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved