SQL 2000 Vs SQL 2005 - Must Do - Syntax And Query Changes
Feb 1, 2008
Hi,
We are into a phase of retiring SQL 2000 database and replacing with SQL 2005. Could you please guide me to get a list of all the MUST DO changes on syntax, statements/query those have been changed in 2005 when compared to 2000.
I know there is a list of new features list on site, but it doesn't tells me precisely what all syntaxes will result differently then expected in 2000. For Example - if we open help for SET ANSI_NULLS ON, we can read that MS is suggesting to avoid its use as it will be absolete in later version. So do we have a list of all such things in one place that we can read and analyse our code for changes to be done now instead of finding it later.
We are currently trying to get to grips with SQL Server 2005, and have a basic question. Is it possible to user Query Analyser from SQL 2000 with 2005? All our support staff use Query Analyser on a day to ay basis and all our clients are currently on SQL Server 2000. It would be usefull if when new customers come on line with 2005 our staff can use one tool to perform their tasks
We've tried to run Query Anayser and it's comming up with a connection error, this may be down to us not setting some access up or not connecting correctly.
The following query works in SQL Server 2000 but gives follwoing error in SQL Server 2005
Msg 8114, Level 16, State 5, Line 1
Error converting data type varchar to float.
=======================
SELECT DISTINCT VWCONTACT.[ID] ID FROM VWCONTACT WHERE VWCONTACT.ACCOUNTID = 2615 AND VWCONTACT.VIRTUALDELETIONDATE IS NULL AND VWCONTACT.EMAIL LIKE '%@%' AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT VWCONTACT.ID FROM (SELECT DISTINCT VWCONTACT.[ID] ID FROM VWCONTACT JOIN (SELECT CONTACTID FROM VWCONTACTATTRIBUTEVALUE WHERE CONTACTATTRIBUTEID = 22943 AND ISNUMERIC(ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 1 AND CONVERT(float,ATTRIBUTEVALUE) >= 77002) TMP0 ON VWCONTACT.ID = TMP0.CONTACTID JOIN (SELECT CONTACTID FROM VWCONTACTATTRIBUTEVALUE WHERE CONTACTATTRIBUTEID = 22943 AND ISNUMERIC(ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 1 AND CONVERT(float,ATTRIBUTEVALUE) <= 77099) TMP1 ON VWCONTACT.ID = TMP1.CONTACTID WHERE VWCONTACT.ACCOUNTID = 2615 AND VWCONTACT.VIRTUALDELETIONDATE IS NULL ) NESTEDQUERY1 WHERE VWCONTACT.ID = NESTEDQUERY1.ID) AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT VWCONTACT.ID FROM (SELECT DISTINCT VWCONTACT.[ID] ID FROM VWCONTACT JOIN (SELECT CONTACTID FROM VWCONTACTATTRIBUTEVALUE WHERE (CONTACTATTRIBUTEID = 22943 AND ISNUMERIC(ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 1 AND CONVERT(float,ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 77336) OR (CONTACTATTRIBUTEID = 22943 AND ISNUMERIC(ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 1 AND CONVERT(float,ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 77338) OR (CONTACTATTRIBUTEID = 22943 AND ISNUMERIC(ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 1 AND CONVERT(float,ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 77345) OR (CONTACTATTRIBUTEID = 22943 AND ISNUMERIC(ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 1 AND CONVERT(float,ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 77365) OR (CONTACTATTRIBUTEID = 22943 AND ISNUMERIC(ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 1 AND CONVERT(float,ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 77396) OR (CONTACTATTRIBUTEID = 22943 AND ISNUMERIC(ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 1 AND CONVERT(float,ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 77489) OR (CONTACTATTRIBUTEID = 22943 AND ISNUMERIC(ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 1 AND CONVERT(float,ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 77504) OR (CONTACTATTRIBUTEID = 22943 AND ISNUMERIC(ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 1 AND CONVERT(float,ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 77598)) ATTR ON ATTR.CONTACTID = VWCONTACT.ID WHERE VWCONTACT.ACCOUNTID = 2615 AND VWCONTACT.VIRTUALDELETIONDATE IS NULL ) NESTEDQUERY1 WHERE VWCONTACT.ID = NESTEDQUERY1.ID) AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT VWCONTACT.ID FROM (SELECT DISTINCT VWCONTACT.[ID] ID FROM VWCONTACT JOIN (SELECT CONTACTID FROM VWCONTACTATTRIBUTEVALUE WHERE CONTACTATTRIBUTEID = 23102 AND ATTRIBUTEVALUE = 'Houston') TMP0 ON VWCONTACT.ID = TMP0.CONTACTID JOIN (SELECT CONTACTID FROM VWCONTACTATTRIBUTEVALUE WHERE CONTACTATTRIBUTEID = 22944 AND ATTRIBUTEVALUE = 'TX') TMP1 ON VWCONTACT.ID = TMP1.CONTACTID WHERE VWCONTACT.ACCOUNTID = 2615 AND VWCONTACT.VIRTUALDELETIONDATE IS NULL ) NESTEDQUERY1 WHERE VWCONTACT.ID = NESTEDQUERY1.ID)
when I modify the query like the following in SQL Server 2005 it works. Now the problem is since it is adynamically generated query from our application based on users selection of criteria, it means a lot to us to change the code.
SELECT DISTINCT VWCONTACT.[ID] ID FROM VWCONTACT WHERE VWCONTACT.ACCOUNTID = 2615 AND VWCONTACT.VIRTUALDELETIONDATE IS NULL AND VWCONTACT.EMAIL LIKE '%@%'
EXCEPT
((SELECT DISTINCT VWCONTACT.[ID] ID FROM VWCONTACT JOIN (SELECT CONTACTID FROM VWCONTACTATTRIBUTEVALUE WHERE CONTACTATTRIBUTEID = 22943 AND ISNUMERIC(ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 1 AND CONVERT(float,ATTRIBUTEVALUE) >= 77002) TMP0 ON VWCONTACT.ID = TMP0.CONTACTID JOIN (SELECT CONTACTID FROM VWCONTACTATTRIBUTEVALUE WHERE CONTACTATTRIBUTEID = 22943 AND ISNUMERIC(ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 1 AND CONVERT(float,ATTRIBUTEVALUE) <= 77099) TMP1 ON VWCONTACT.ID = TMP1.CONTACTID WHERE VWCONTACT.ACCOUNTID = 2615 AND VWCONTACT.VIRTUALDELETIONDATE IS NULL ) UNION (SELECT DISTINCT VWCONTACT.[ID] ID FROM VWCONTACT JOIN (SELECT CONTACTID FROM VWCONTACTATTRIBUTEVALUE WHERE (CONTACTATTRIBUTEID = 22943 AND ISNUMERIC(ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 1 AND CONVERT(float,ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 77336) OR (CONTACTATTRIBUTEID = 22943 AND ISNUMERIC(ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 1 AND CONVERT(float,ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 77338) OR (CONTACTATTRIBUTEID = 22943 AND ISNUMERIC(ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 1 AND CONVERT(float,ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 77345) OR (CONTACTATTRIBUTEID = 22943 AND ISNUMERIC(ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 1 AND CONVERT(float,ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 77365) OR (CONTACTATTRIBUTEID = 22943 AND ISNUMERIC(ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 1 AND CONVERT(float,ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 77396) OR (CONTACTATTRIBUTEID = 22943 AND ISNUMERIC(ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 1 AND CONVERT(float,ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 77489) OR (CONTACTATTRIBUTEID = 22943 AND ISNUMERIC(ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 1 AND CONVERT(float,ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 77504) OR (CONTACTATTRIBUTEID = 22943 AND ISNUMERIC(ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 1 AND CONVERT(float,ATTRIBUTEVALUE) = 77598)) ATTR ON ATTR.CONTACTID = VWCONTACT.ID WHERE VWCONTACT.ACCOUNTID = 2615 AND VWCONTACT.VIRTUALDELETIONDATE IS NULL ) UNION (SELECT DISTINCT VWCONTACT.[ID] ID FROM VWCONTACT JOIN (SELECT CONTACTID FROM VWCONTACTATTRIBUTEVALUE WHERE CONTACTATTRIBUTEID = 23102 AND ATTRIBUTEVALUE = 'Houston') TMP0 ON VWCONTACT.ID = TMP0.CONTACTID JOIN (SELECT CONTACTID FROM VWCONTACTATTRIBUTEVALUE WHERE CONTACTATTRIBUTEID = 22944 AND ATTRIBUTEVALUE = 'TX') TMP1 ON VWCONTACT.ID = TMP1.CONTACTID WHERE VWCONTACT.ACCOUNTID = 2615 AND VWCONTACT.VIRTUALDELETIONDATE IS NULL ))
We are in the process of upgrading from SQL Server 2000 to 2005. During testing we came across the following situation.
To reproduce the issue you can do the following
Create this structure in a 2000 and 2005 server instances
CREATE TABLE test (a int, b varchar(30))
INSERT INTO test (a, b) VALUES (1, '2')
INSERT INTO test (a, b) VALUES (3, '3a')
INSERT INTO test (a, b) VALUES (4, '4')
Then run the following statement in both servers:
UPDATE test SET a = ltrim(rtrim(b)) WHERE b NOT LIKE '%a%' AND ltrim(rtrim(b)) <> a
In 2000 this last statement will execute with no problem and it will update one row, whereas in 2005 the following error message is given:
Msg 245, Level 16, State 1, Line 20 Conversion failed when converting the varchar value '3a' to data type int.
By looking at the execution plan it seems that 2005 first tries to evaluate ltrim(rtrim(b)) <> a and then excludes those rows containing a whereas 2000 first excludes those rows containing a and then evaluates the different than condition.
I know fixing this instance itself is easy but I€™m more concerned about having to rewrite many more stored procedures where we find this same scenario; is there any setting that can be changed to avoid this?
I found an unusual problem between 2000 and 2005 I haven't been ableto decipher from any documentation.The query structure is as follows:select *fromtableA ajointableB b ON a.somekey = b.somekeywherea.type = 'A'and datediff(yyyy, b.someDateField, getdate()) betweena.lowboundary and a.highboundarySome basic facts about the elements and data. The low and high-boundary fields are varchar datatypes. In 2005 (regardless ofcompatibility type I run the database under), the query evaluates theBETWEEN and errors out due to the fact that it is evaluating theDATEDIFF as an integer and finds a non-integer entry in eitherlowboundary or highboundary. I understand and expect this behavior.Obviously, changing the result of the DATEDIFF function to varcharallows the operation to go forth.The odd thing is that there is no "a.type = 'A' " entry, thus thequery wouldn't return anything. In 2000, it seems as though theengine is evaluating the type = 'A' and short-circuiting and in 2005,it is trying to evaluate the entire query OR is there an implicitconversion occuring in 2000 and not in 2005?As I mentioned, the compatibility mode doesn't change how this reacts,but running this on a native 2000 server allows this to happen. Thisparticular code isn't the problem, it's what we might have to contendwith when we migrate this through. Sure, we're going to performregression testing, but I'm concerned about what we would miss.Thanks for any replies.
We have an interesting problem. We are attempting to migrate from sql 2000 to sql 2005. the schema we have is exactly the same. the new 2005 box is more powerful than our 2000 box.
here is our schema:
tbl_Items ItemID int pk ReferenceID int sessionid varchar(255) StatusID int
tbl_ItemsStatus statusid int pk isinternalstatus bit
there is an index on (ReferenceID, SessionID, StatusID) and (SessionID, StatusID)
this is the query:
DECLARE @referenceid INTEGER SET @referenceid = 1019
SELECT MAX(i2.itemid) FROM tbl_Items i2 (NOLOCK) JOIN tbl_ItemsStatus s (NOLOCK) ON i2.StatusID = s.StatusID WHERE s.IsInternalStatus = 0 AND i2.referenceid = @referenceid AND i2.sessionid IN ( SELECT i3.sessionid FROM tbl_Items i3 (NOLOCK) WHERE i3.referenceid = @referenceid AND i3.status <> 7 AND i3.status <> 8 AND i3.status <> 10 AND i3.itemid IN ( SELECT max(i4.itemid) FROM tbl_Items i4 (NOLOCK) WHERE i4.referenceid = @referenceid GROUP BY i4.sessionid ) AND i3.itemid NOT IN ( SELECT MAX(i7.itemid ) FROM tbl_Items i7 (NOLOCK) WHERE i7.referenceid = @referenceid AND i7.SessionID IN ( SELECT i5.SessionID FROM tbl_Items i5 (NOLOCK) WHERE i5.status <> 11 AND i5.referenceid = @referenceid AND i5.itemid IN ( SELECT MAX(i6.itemid) FROM tbl_Items i6 (NOLOCK) WHERE i6.referenceid = @referenceid AND i6.status IN (7,11,8) GROUP BY i6.sessionid ) ) GROUP BY i7.SessionID ) )
GROUP BY i2.sessionid
we know this query is pretty bad and can be optimized. however, if we run this query as is on 2005 it takes about 2 hours to run...if we run the exact same query on 2000 it takes 9 seconds.
so this query on 2005 if run takes 2 hours..however, if we omit the s.IsInternalStatus = 0 or the i2.referenceid = @referenceid line it takes about 9 seconds.
why would this be? it makes no sense why omitting one of those where clauses would increase the performance of the query by 2 hours? we know its a bad query...but this doesnt make sense.
if have a problem with a SELECT query that works very fine on SQL Server 2000 but not on 2005. I've transfered my db by creating a full backup and restoring the db on 2005. The db is working except this problem.
When i start executing it doesn't finish. I waited a couple of minutes. On 2000 it only takes about 6 seconds to run.
Here it is:
Code Snippet
SELECT * FROM PPS_TERMbesttmpwhere PPS_TermBestTmp.BestNr + CONVERT(varchar(30),CAST(REPLACE(PPS_TermBestTmp.Pos1, ',', '.') AS float),2)
NOT IN (SELECT PPS_TermBest.BestNr + CONVERT(varchar(30), PPS_TermBest.Pos1,2) FROM PPS_TermBest) Any ideas?
I'm having an issue with a query I'm running on Sql Server 2005. It's a semi-complex query involving an in-line table function and several left outer joins which are joined on to the results of the function call. Two of the left outer joins are then qualified in a where clause of the form where table.Col is not null; the idea is that the final result set contains data that has no match in those two tables.
The problem revolves around a where clause in the function and the last left outer join (ie, one of the ones qualified with where not null). When I alter the where clause of the function to further restrict the result set the function returns, the query times shoots up from 1 second to roughly 2-3 minutes. Note that the time the function takes to complete is not affected. The difference in time is purely down to what the query does with the results the function provides. Also note that the change to the where clause provides a subset of the original data; it does not add any more data (it actually restricts the original resultset by roughly 1000 rows).
I can bring the query speed back down again by removing the last left outer join - this join takes one of the columns from the function, and joins it to a small table - 924 rows. So it appears that this particular join is the cause of the issue, but only when using the resultset generated from the modified function query.
Now, as the thread title alludes, Sql Server 2000 and 2005 handle this differently, or appear to. When I execute this same query on a Sql 2000 machine, there's no apparent time differences, and the data that is returned is as expected. Does anyone have any suggestions as to what might be causing this and how I can fix it? I could simply return the larger resultset and use managed code to filter out the rows I don't want; however, I would like to get to the bottom of this, especially if it's going to effect future queries.
I have a simple update statement that is running forever in SQL 2005 but works fine in SQL 2000. We have a new server we put SQL 2005, restored db. The table in question WEEKLYSALESHISTORY I even re-indexed all the indexes and rebuilt the stats as well. But still no luck, still running extremely long. 1 hour 20 minutes.
I'll try to give you some background on these table. Weeklysalehistory has approx 30 fields. I have 11 indesxes set up weekending date being one of them. And replication control has index on lasttrandatetime as well. So I think my indexes are fine.
/* Update WeekEnding Date for current weeks WeeklySales Records */ Update WeeklySalesHistory set weekendingdate = (SELECT LastTransDateTime from ReplicationControl where TableName = 'WEEKHST') where weekendingdate is null
Weekly sales has approx 100,000,000 rows Replication control has 631,000 (Ithink I can delete some from here to bring it down to 100 or 200 records) Although I don't think this is issue since on 2000 has same thing and works fine.
I was trying to do this within SSIS and thought that was issue. I am new so SSIS but it runs long even if I just run it as a job with this simple Update statement so I think its something with tables, etc that is wrong.
One thing on noticed if I look at the statistics in SQL Server Management studio there is a ton of stats. some being statistics on indexes which makes sense then I have a ton of hind_113_9_6 and simiiar one like this. I must have 90 or so named like this. Not sure how to check on SQL 2000 all the stats to see if they moved over from there or what. I checked a few other tables and don't have all these extra stats. Could this be causing the issue do I need to delete all these extras? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
We recently upgrade to 2005(sp). We have one report that ran fine in 2000 but leaves out data from certain columns (date related) in the results, so we chalked it up to being a non compatiable issue. So, I decided to try and switch the DB back to 2000 compatibility (in our test env) and then back to 2005. After that the report started returning the proper data. We can€™t really explain why it worked but it did. So we thought we would try it in prod (we knew it was a long shot) and it didn€™t work. So the business needs this report so we thought we would refresh the test system from prod, but now we are back to square one. I was wondering if anyone else has heard or seen anything like this. I am open to any idea€™s, no matter how crazy. J The systems are configured identically. Let me know if you need more information.
I am trying to write some admin only procedures which will collect information to one of my development server from other production and development servers.
I have created linked servers to access these other servers on the development server. This development server is SQL Server 2000 EE. Other servers which I want to access are 2000 and 2005 (vaious editions)
E.g I have another development server called PRODTEST which is SQL Server 2005 and on the development server I have created a linked server pointing to PRODTEST called TESTLINKSRV. I want to access new object catalog view (as I do not want to use sysobjects)
When I run the following query
SELECT * FROM [TESTLINKSRV].[DBNAME].[sys].[objects]
I get following error,
OLE DB error trace [Non-interface error: OLE DB provider does not contain the table: ProviderName=' TESTLINKSRV ', TableName='" DBNAME "."sys"."objects"'].
Msg 7314, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
OLE DB provider ' TESTLINKSRV ' does not contain table '"DBNAME"."sys"."objects"'. The table either does not exist or the current user does not have permissions on that table.
So I try this query
SELECT * FROM [TESTLINKSRV].[DBNAME].[sys.objects]
and I get following error
Msg 208, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Invalid object name TESTLINKSRV.DBNAME.sys.objects'.
So bottom line is how do I access catalog views on a 2005 server from a 2000 server using linked server?
I hope someone understands what I am trying to achieve. Please let me know what is it that I am doing wrong. Thank you
We would like to install Sql 2005 Enterprise Edition (including database engine, reporting service, integration service and analysis service) as a sepearte instance on a server which already has Sql 2000 with reporting services and analysis services. We do not want to disturb the existing sql 2000 setup.
If we do that then what will happen to my earlier sql 2000 reporting service? Will it be upgraded to sql 2005 reporting service? I heard that reporting services are instance unaware application. Where will be the default reporting service database available?
@startRowIndex int, @maximumRows int, @SortOrder int AS
DECLARE @TempItems TABLE ( ID int IDENTITY, OrderID int ) DECLARE @maxRow int SET @maxRow = (@startRowIndex + @maximumRows) - 1 SET ROWCOUNT @maxRow INSERT INTO @TempItems (OrderID) SELECT OrderID FROM Orders o INNER JOIN Customers c ON c.CustomerID = o.CustomerID INNER JOIN Employees e ON e.EmployeeID = o.EmployeeID ORDER BY CASE @SortOrder WHEN 0 THEN OrderID WHEN 1 THEN c.CompanyName WHEN 2 THEN e.FirstName WHEN 3 THEN o.OrderDate WHEN 4 THEN o.RequiredDate WHEN 5 THEN o.ShippedDate END
SET ROWCOUNT @maximumRows SELECT o.OrderID, CompanyName, e.FirstName + ' ' + e.LastName EmployeeName, o.OrderDate, o.RequiredDate, o.ShippedDate FROM @TempItems t INNER JOIN Orders o ON o.OrderID = t.OrderID INNER JOIN Customers c ON c.CustomerID = o.CustomerID INNER JOIN Employees e ON e.EmployeeID = o.EmployeeID WHERE t.[ID] >= @startRowIndex AND (o.OrderID LIKE @intOrderID OR @intOrderID = '') AND (o.CustomerID = @strCustomerID OR @strCustomerID='') AND (o.EmployeeID = @intEmployeeID OR @intEmployeeID = 0) AND (o.OrderDate = @dteOrderDate OR @dteOrderDate IS NULL) SET ROWCOUNT 0 GO
when i execute the sp with @sortOrder = 0, it works fine exec CustomPaging '','',0,null, 1, 10, 0
but if i try anything else (@SortOrder=1) i get the error message exec CustomPaging '','',0,null, 1, 10, 1 Syntax error converting datetime from character string.
but im unsure what is causing this problem? and how to sort it?
if it is possible to run a distributed query against 2000 from 2005, what would the OPENDATASOURCE parameters look like? I'd like to be able to pivot without copying my older 2000 db to 2005 or using linked servers..
For reference, here's an example of a distrib query that reads excel...
ie SELECT * INTO XLImport3 FROM OPENDATASOURCE('Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0', 'Data Source=C: estxltest.xls;Extended Properties=Excel 8.0')...[Customers$]
SQL 2000: 8.00.2187 x86, 8 way 700mhz, 6GB Ram SQL 2005: 9.00.3042 IA64 2 Way Dual-Core 1.66Mhz 16 GB ram
Symptoms
Querys to the SQL 2005 box from SQL 2000 work but when the query is parameterised with non-literals (@variables) then the query run on the SQL 2005 box excludes any where clause causing the entire table to be returned to the SQL 200 box. When the query is parameterised using literal values the query is executed on SQL 2005 including the where clause.
At first I thought that the "Collation Compatible" setting was the culprit but setting this to 1 made no difference. Other SQL 2000 boxes work as expected and any queries from these using literal and non-literal parameters.
Please, any ideas?
Working
SELECT A.Column FROM linkedServer.IA.dbo.Table Where A.Column = 'value'
Not Working (correctly anyway!)
DECALRE @Value tinyint SET @Value = 22 SELECT A.Column FROM linkedServer.IA.dbo.Table Where A.Column = @value
Select e.name, e.employee_id, d.department_name from employees e,departments d where e.department_id = d.department_id
An associate recommended that I change this query to add the words INNER JOIN like this:
Select e.name, e.employee_id, d.department_name from employees e inner join departments d on e.department_id = d.department_id
I was of the understanding that the first query was Microsoft SQL Syntax, and that the second example was ANSI SQL syntax, but that they executed on the server the same way. My associate however thinks that the second example will execute faster.
select Count(*) from iCalls_Events where Call_ID = " & Session("Call_ID") & " select Count(*) from iCalls_Events where Call_ID = "& Session("Call_ID") & " and Events_Flag <> 0
in this query
Code:
select iCalls_Calls.Call_ID,iCalls_Calls.Requestor,Type,Scope,iCalls_Calls.Status_ID,iCalls_Status.Status_I D, iCalls_Status.Status_Label from ((iCalls_Calls inner join iCalls_Status on iCalls_Calls.Status_ID=iCalls_Status.Status_ID ) inner join iCalls_Users on iCalls_Calls.Requestor=iCalls_Users.User_ID) left outer join iCalls_Messages on iCalls_Calls.Call_ID=iCalls_Messages.Call_ID where Requestor='" & Session("User_ID") & "' AND iCalls_Calls.Status_ID <> 6 order by iCalls_Calls.Call_ID
((iCalls_Calls inner join iCalls_Status on iCalls_Calls.Status_ID=iCalls_Status.Status_ID )
I want to add ( / ) in between these 2 queries. The reason is for example first query will return '5' and second '10' , so the output i need is 5 / 10. And i need to put this query in a variable (Countrec) like
Code:
select Count(*) from iCalls_Events where Call_ID = " & Session("Call_ID") & " ( / ) select Count(*) from iCalls_Events where Call_ID = "& Session("Call_ID") & " and Events_Flag <> 0 as Countrec
The Final Query would be something like this
Code:
select iCalls_Calls.Call_ID,iCalls_Calls.Requestor,Type,Scope,iCalls_Calls.Status_ID,iCalls_Status.Status_I D, iCalls_Status.Status_Label, select Count(*) from iCalls_Events where Call_ID = " & Session("Call_ID") & " ( / ) select Count(*) from iCalls_Events where Call_ID = "& Session("Call_ID") & " and Events_Flag <> 0 as Countrec from ((iCalls_Calls inner join iCalls_Status on iCalls_Calls.Status_ID=iCalls_Status.Status_ID ) inner join iCalls_Users on iCalls_Calls.Requestor=iCalls_Users.User_ID) left outer join iCalls_Messages on iCalls_Calls.Call_ID=iCalls_Messages.Call_ID where Requestor='" & Session("User_ID") & "' AND iCalls_Calls.Status_ID <> 6 order by iCalls_Calls.Call_ID
but this syntax is not correct..Please can U get me the Correct Syntax.
I have a query that I am running out of sql server 2000 that is pulling duplicate records. I can probably figure it out but I am wondering if someone could look at it and point out errors in my syntax and/or structure.
Thanks!
code:-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SELECT p.ParticipantID, pr.RaceID, p.FirstName, p.LastName, pr.Bib, p.Gender, pr.Age, pr.AgeGrp, p.DOB, p.Address, p.City, p.St, p.Zip, pr.Clyde, pr.WhlChr, pr.RcWlk, p.Phone, p.Email, reg.ShrtSize, reg.ShrtStyle, reg.WhereReg, reg.DateReg, reg.AmtPd FROM Participant p INNER JOIN PartReg reg ON p.ParticipantID = reg.ParticipantID JOIN PartRace pr ON pr.ParticipantID = p.ParticipantID JOIN RaceData rd ON pr.RaceID = rd.RaceID WHERE (rd.EventID = 45 AND pr.RaceID = reg.RaceID) ORDER BY p.LastName --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have a query that I am running out of sql server 2000 that is pulling duplicate records. I can probably figure it out but I am wondering if someone could look at it and point out errors in my syntax and/or structure.
Thanks!
code:-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SELECT p.ParticipantID, pr.RaceID, p.FirstName, p.LastName, pr.Bib, p.Gender, pr.Age, pr.AgeGrp, p.DOB, p.Address, p.City, p.St, p.Zip, pr.Clyde, pr.WhlChr, pr.RcWlk, p.Phone, p.Email, reg.ShrtSize, reg.ShrtStyle, reg.WhereReg, reg.DateReg, reg.AmtPd FROM Participant p INNER JOIN PartReg reg ON p.ParticipantID = reg.ParticipantID JOIN PartRace pr ON pr.ParticipantID = p.ParticipantID JOIN RaceData rd ON pr.RaceID = rd.RaceID WHERE (rd.EventID = 45 AND pr.RaceID = reg.RaceID) ORDER BY p.LastName --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
am looking to make a select query that has some condition where it should look like: select if(SomeField is null) then 'Not Set' else SomeField from SomeTable
Hi all,I have the following tables:T1==ID Name-- ----1 Name12 Name2T2==ID Color-- ----1 Color11 Color22 Color22 Color3and I would like to get the following output (without duplicates):ID Colors-- ------1 Color1, Color22 Color2, Color3Is it possible?
Hello All,I have the following table:CREATE TABLE [dbo].[TBL_NAME] ([NAME] [varchar] (50) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,[STANDARD_NAME] [varchar] (50) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_ASNULL) ON [PRIMARY]GOWith values:insert into tbl_namevalues('DAN', 'DANIEL')insert into tbl_namevalues('DANNY', 'DANIEL')insert into tbl_namevalues('DANYY', 'DANIEL')Question is:I need want to construct a query which returns all names for a standardname plus the standard name itself.e.g.if name = 'DAN' then return 'DAN', 'DANNY', 'DANYY', 'DANIEL'ff name = 'DANIEL', then return 'DAN', 'DANNY', 'DANYY', 'DANIEL'i have the following sql:declare @name varchar(50)select @name = 'DANIEL'select standard_name from tbl_name where name = @nameunionselect name from tbl_name where standard_name = (select standard_namefrom tbl_name where name = @name)unionselect name from tbl_name where standard_name = @nameunionselect standard_name from tbl_name where standard_name = @name----declare @name varchar(50)select @name = 'DANNY'select standard_name from tbl_name where name = @nameunionselect name from tbl_name where standard_name = (select standard_namefrom tbl_name where name = @name)unionselect name from tbl_name where standard_name = @nameunionselect standard_name from tbl_name where standard_name = @name----Both appear to work fine..can anyone see a fault or suggest a cleanerway to achieve the above ?Suggestions/pointers appreciatedThanks in advance
sql query syntax?i write this query but error get : column not foundhow can i write ?SELECT c.stock_cat_name, a.stock_code, c.description, a.date,IIF(MID(a.type,2,1)="I",SUM(a.quantity),0) AS iqty,IIF(MID(a.type,2,1)="O",SUM(a.quantity),0) AS oqtyFROM stock_tran AS a LEFT JOIN stock AS c ON c.stock_code=a.stock_codeWHERE a.date>=[from_date] And a.date<=[to_date]GROUP BY c.stock_cat_name, a.stock_code, c.description, a.date,MID(a.type,2,1)ORDER BY c.stock_cat_name, a.stock_code, a.date, MID(a.type,2,1);this database driver sage line 50 odbci write a simpale query of this database, successful run but when iwrite in condition (IF) is not run error comes : column not found.rashesh
Hi all! I am new here and I'm also new to SQL.. I hope somebody could help me regarding my problem.
I don't know if this is possible but I would like to have a code that can integrate data from 3 tables. The names of my tables are Savings, Loans and Insurances. Their common field is the MemberID. One member could have zero or more Savings Accounts. At the same time, a member could also have one or more accounts on Loans or Insurances.
How can I get the data that would appear like this:
I would like to combine the production times and down times into one summary where the down time is in the same date and shift as the production time. As you can see in my results below, I can group them correctly, but the down totals obviously repeat for each match. Is there any way of getting to the "Desired results"?
I have a query slower in SQL Server 2005 than in SQL Server 2000. I have a database in SQL 2000, I put it on the same server, but with SQL 2005 and the query take 5 seconds instead of 0 seconds. The DB compatibility is SQL Server 2000 (I tried with 2005 and result is the same). Execution plan seems right and I tried to change some DB options without results. It is weird, when I remove left join on MandatsEx, it take 2 seconds. The view currentEmployeeLevelHistoric returns 45 000 rows and mandatsex has 0 rows.
Here is the sample:
Select ls.EmployeNiveau.pk_EmployeNiveauID as NoNiveau, IsNull(nullif(ls.Traduction.Description, ''), ls.TraductionDefaut.Description) + ' (' + ls.currentLevelHIstoric.NoNiveau + ')' As Nom, ls.currentEmployeeLevelHistoric.DebAssign As DateAssignationDebut, ls.EmployeNiveau.assignmentReason As AssignmentReason, ls.currentEmployeeLevelHistoric.FinAssign As DateAssignationFin, ls.MandatsEx.noDossier, ls.MandatsEx.pk_MandatID, '' As Period, ls.currentEmployeeLevelHistoric.NiveauPrincipal, ls.currentEmployeeLevelHistoric.pk_emplNiveauHisto_Id, ls.EmployeNiveau.fk_NiveauID_Niveaux, ls.EmployeNiveau.No_Ent_leg, IsNull(nullif(TradPere.Description, ''), TradDefautPere.Description) + ' (' + NiveauPere.NoNiveau + ')' As NomSup, ls.EmployeNiveau.No_Ent_leg + ls.EmployeNiveau.no_divisio + ls.EmployeNiveau.no_sec_eco + ls.EmployeNiveau.no_etabli + ls.EmployeNiveau.no_mat as employeeScope, case when ls.mandatExternalisation.fk_mandatID_MandatsEx is null then 2 else 1 end as ContractCategory From ls.currentEmployeeLevelHistoric Inner Join ls.EmployeNiveau on ls.currentEmployeeLevelHistoric.pk_EmployeNiveauID = ls.EmployeNiveau.pk_EmployeNiveauID Inner join ls.currentLevelHistoric On ls.EmployeNiveau.fk_NiveauID_Niveaux = ls.currentLevelHistoric.fk_niveauID_niveaux Left Outer Join ls.TraductionDefaut On ls.currentLevelHIstoric.fk_TraductionID_TraductionDefaut = ls.TraductionDefaut.pk_NoTraduction Left Outer Join ls.Traduction On ls.TraductionDefaut.pk_NoTraduction = ls.Traduction.No_Traduction and ls.Traduction.Langue = 1 Left Join ls.MandatsEx on ls.EmployeNiveau.fk_MandatID_MandatsEx = ls.MandatsEx.pk_MandatID Left Join ls.mandatExternalisation on ls.MandatsEx.pk_MandatID = ls.mandatExternalisation.fk_mandatID_MandatsEx left Join ls.Niveaux as NiveauPere on NiveauPere.niveauID = ls.currentLevelHIstoric.supId Left Outer Join ls.TraductionDefaut As TradDefautPere On NiveauPere.fk_TraductionID_TraductionDefaut = TradDefautPere.pk_NoTraduction Left Outer Join ls.Traduction As TradPere On TradDefautPere.pk_NoTraduction = TradPere.No_Traduction and TradPere.Langue = 1 Where ls.EmployeNiveau.fk_EmploID_Emplos = 345158 and (convert(varchar, ls.currentEmployeeLevelHistoric.DebAssign, 112) <= '20060802' and (ls.currentEmployeeLevelHistoric.FinAssign is null or convert(varchar, ls.currentEmployeeLevelHistoric.FinAssign, 112) >= '20060802'))
I am getting a SQLExcepetion error near , in this query string...so obvicously my query string is wrong... could someone help me get this query string right please...
Thanks "Select OrgID, OrgName From aspnet_OrgNames Where UserID = @UserID, OrgID = @OrgID"
I have modelled this query after another query which works fine and retrieves a result set. It accepts a search parameter and brings up all the websites in the database by searching on various columns for the search text. The article search query works the same way. I just changed the tables and parameters to match the tables. It uses the "view" and I had to go into the query and check a few columns in the query designer to add the column to the view. Here's the query with the syntax error: 1 set ANSI_NULLS ON 2 3 set QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON 4 5 GO 6 7 ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[_spArticleSearch] 8 9 @search varchar (100), 10 11 @orderBy varchar(200)='ActiveMemberShip DESC, PageRank DESC, ArticleTitle, DateAdded DESC' 12 13 AS 14 15 EXEC('SELECT * from vArticle 16 17 where Active=1 AND ShowInDirectory=1 AND 18 19 ( 20 21 Articletitle like ''%' + @search + '%'' 22 23 OR Articletext LIKE ''%' + @search + '%'' 24 25 OR ShortDesc LIKE ''%' + @search + '%'' 26 27 OR Keywords LIKE ''%' + @search + '%'' 28 29 IN (SELECT ACategoryID FROM tblArticleCategory WHERE AActive=1 AND (ACategoryName LIKE ''%' + @search + '%'' OR AParentID IN(SELECT ACategoryID FROM tblArticleCategory WHERE AActive=1 AND ACategoryName LIKE ''%' + @search + '%''))) 30 31 ) 32 33 ORDER BY ' + @OrderBy ) 34 35 36
When I run the stored procedure and input a word into the search box, and it gives me this: Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Line 8 Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'IN'. Msg 102, Level 15, State 1, Line 9 Incorrect syntax near ')'. (1 row(s) affected) This is the query it was modelled after which works fine and retrieves all the websites. 1 set ANSI_NULLS ON2 set QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON3 GO4 5 ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[_spWebSiteSearch]6 @search varchar (100),7 @orderBy varchar(200)='ActiveMemberShip DESC, PageRank DESC, TotalExchangedLinks Desc, SiteTitle, SiteURL, DateAdded DESC'8 9 AS10 11 EXEC('SELECT * from vWebSite12 where Active=1 AND ShowInDirectory=1 AND13 (14 sitetitle like ''%' + @search + '%''15 OR SiteURL LIKE ''%' + @search + '%''16 OR SiteDescription LIKE ''%' + @search + '%''17 OR CategoryID IN18 (SELECT CategoryID FROM tblCategory WHERE Active=1 AND (CategoryName LIKE ''%' + @search + '%'' OR ParentID IN(SELECT CategoryID FROM tblCategory WHERE Active=1 AND CategoryName LIKE ''%' + @search + '%'')))19 )20 ORDER BY ' + @OrderBy )21 Does anyone know where the problem may be? Do the columns in the view have to be in order? When I added my columns, it adds them to the very far right side of the view. Does the columns to be in order in the same way it searches in the query?
Ok I can run the query below in SQL Query Analyzer with no problems. However when I place the SQL query in my asp.net page I get a syntax error. It looks like there is some issue I am not seeing can someone help me. The error i get is "Incorrect syntax near 'pb_sub_recipes_1'. " I have narrowed it down to the area in bold as to where the syntax error appears to be occuring.
SELECT DISTINCT pb_customers.customer_name FROM pb_sub_recipes AS pb_sub_recipes_1 INNER JOIN ((((((pb_jobs INNER JOIN pb_jobs_lots ON pb_jobs.job_id = pb_jobs_lots.job_id) INNER JOIN pb_recipes ON pb_jobs.recipe_id = pb_recipes.recipe_id) INNER JOIN pb_recipes_sub_recipes ON pb_recipes.recipe_id = pb_recipes_sub_recipes.recipe_id) INNER JOIN pb_customers ON pb_jobs.customer_id = pb_customers.customer_id) INNER JOIN pb_sub_recipes ON pb_recipes_sub_recipes.sub_recipe_id = pb_sub_recipes.sub_recipe_id) LEFT JOIN pb_report_shippers ON pb_jobs.job_id = pb_report_shippers.job_id) ON pb_sub_recipes_1.sub_recipe_id = pb_recipes_sub_recipes.sub_recipe_id WHERE (((pb_jobs.date_time)> '5/30/2004') AND pb_customers.customer_id ='228' AND ((pb_report_shippers.shipper_date_time) Is Null) AND ((pb_jobs.job_deleted)=0)) GROUP BY pb_customers.customer_name, pb_jobs.date_time, pb_sub_recipes.energy,pb_sub_recipes.dose,pb_jobs.job_id,pb_sub_recipes.specie,pb_sub_recipes_1.cost_per_wafer, pb_sub_recipes_1.setup_cost pb_sub_recipes_1.wafers_in_batch"
