SQL 2000 On Win2K AS: Failing To Bind On TCP Port 1433
Jan 11, 2001
I've got SQL 2000 set up on a cluster running Windows 2000 Advanced Server (w/SP1).
Setup for Failover Clustering appeared to succeed normally on both nodes.
The SQL 2000 server logs show:
2001-01-11 10:02:57.82 server SuperSocket Info: Bind failed on TCP port 1433.
2001-01-11 10:02:57.85 server SQL server listening on Shared Memory, Named Pipes.
2001-01-11 10:02:57.85 server SQL Server is ready for client connections
I've checked to see if something else is using port 1433 (unlikely) and don't see anything.
The physical node that SQL 2000 is currently on has no other cluster resources assigned to it.
Any ideas?
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jul 20, 2005
for some reason i dont get any errors, but i believe that my server isnot running on port 1433. the tcpip protocol is selected in thenetwork configuration utility as well as name piper. the portselected is 1433. but when i telnet to 1433 i get the same errors as iwould if i telnet to a non existant port. i also tried nbstat with noluck. what else can i do? thanks
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 13, 2002
I have installed MS server sql 7.0 and 2000 both on my PC. The default port i know is 1433. If sql 7.0 is already installed. Which port does sql 2000 listen on.
Is there a way i can view this ?
Thanks in advance
Cheers
Hemant
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
HiI have a question regarding the SQL Server(SQL Server 7) port 1433.Some body is trying to hack into our Windows 2000 server through port1433. Is there a way i can close this port? I tried using a toolcalled Ipsecpol.exe ( Internet Protocol Security Policies Tool). Butwhen we run netstat, it still looks like they are able to connect tothe server using port 1433. Has anyone come across this problem? Iwould appreciate it very much if somebody could send in anysuggestions regarding this.Thanks,Ann
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jun 7, 2000
Ok,
The Scenario is as follows:
24/7 Production Call Centre server running NT4.0 and SQL 6.5 with all the latest service packs.
SQL mail fails(with dull regularity) and the SQL server services stop.
When the SQL server Services are restarted an error message appears stating that Port 1433 is in use after which nobody can connect via TCP/IP. Obviously the port believes the previous SQL session is still running, and won't release the port to the "New Application requesting it".
On a unix system you can force a port reset so you don't need to shutdown and restart the box. Can you do this from either SQL or NT?
Any solutions would be greatly appreciated the DBA's are 100 Miles from the Servers, so restarts are reliant on other people!
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 4, 2001
Does anyone have an idea on why when using IP with port 1433 that on the SQL 2000 Server a bind failure happens on port 1433 and are not able to get to the SQL using IP but you can use Named Pipes.
Would greatly appreciate any help.
Walter
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 2, 2004
Did a search on port 1433 but nothing came up in the search.
This question is more geared to DBAs more then SQL developers.
I have a SQL 2000 server on a win2k3 machine. For some reason it will not listen in on TCP port 1433.
Shared memory and Named Pipes do though.
I checked the Server Network Utility and I see TCP/IP listed right under Named Pipes and I see that the default port is 1433.
Any ideas how to get SQL to listen on that port?
View 14 Replies
View Related
Apr 29, 2008
i am asked to change the default port 1433 to some other name by the audit team.
is it safe to change the port in cluster mode.
View 17 Replies
View Related
Dec 15, 2000
Does anyone know how to change the default port number of 1433 to somethinig else?
Thanks!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 22, 2004
How many people have actually change their sql port from 1433 to something else
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 30, 2001
I have sql server that get the following error on error log.
SuperSocket Info: Bind failed on TCP port 1433.
This error forces client to use Named Pipe to connect to SQL Server.
Does anyone how to fix this error.
Thank You,
John
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 10, 2015
So, I have 2 laptops, both with standalone SQL Server 2012 Management Studio.
laptop 1 can connect to my remote server on xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx,1433
laptop 2 cannot connect through management studio - but can connect directly from the development website on this machine.
I get error 18456, cannot connect to server and login failed for 'user'
Firewall on or off has no effect.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Nov 26, 2005
Witam!Mam problem z polaczeniem sie z baza danych po TCP/IP przez port domyslny1433, nie mozna sie telnetowac ani nic z nim zrobic, poprostu niezyje. Portjest zamkniety i nijak nie moge go zmusic do jakiejkolwiek komunikacji nawetpo localhoscie. Skaner portów wykrywa go jako zamkniety. Czy wiecie moze jakten port otworzyc i zmusic go do komunikacji z baza danych? OS win2k3,MSSQL2000 Server.PozdrawiamHello!I have a problem with a TCP/IP connection to Data Base through the 1433port. I cannot telnet on this port even on localhost. My firewalls aredisabled but port scanner see the port as closed. Protocol TCP/IP on theMSSQL Server is enabled and it's not hidden, so I don't know what I shouldto do. My configurations: Win2k3 Server, MSSQL Server 2000Thx for answers.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 17, 2007
Been having SQL Server 2000 running for some time now, but recently it stopped listening on TCP port 1433, the log reports its listening on shared memory, Named pipes and Rpc, but no sign of 127.0.0.1 port 1433 or any errors to say why it won't listen.
I've done a netstat -na and nothing else is listening on that port, tried restarting using the enterprise manager, gonna try restarting the entire Server when everyone has gone home, but I'm pretty sure its been restarted recently.
All the other archive logs going back a few days show its not listening.
Yes, I have used the Server network utility to make sure TCP/IP is enabled and set to 1433, even added a comma and 1434 to see if it will listen on multiple ports, no go.
Any help?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jun 20, 2004
I want to know how to check whether SQL Server 2000 can listen to port 1433 or not. If I run netstat -a, am I suppose to see port 1433 regardless of what service pack I have applied to SQL Server 2000?
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jun 13, 2006
Hi,
Does SQL mobile require port 1433 to be open for RDA? I was under the impression that all synching occured through port 80. But when 1433 is restricted a connection cannot be completed.
I may be missing something really simple. My understanding of tcp/ip networking concepts are not very solid.
Thanks,
Tony.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2015
Version: SQL SERVER 2012 enterprise edition and SP2.
Due to one of the security reason, I have changed default port 1433 to another port number in configuration manger tools->protocols for MSSQLSERVER->TCP/IP --> IP ALL section mention another port number.
After restarted service, SQL SSMS able to connect server itself and new port number also LISTENING.
But SQL client SSMS not connected to one of the PC side after changing default port.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 21, 2015
SQL Server 2012 two node single instance cluster.
For DB access from application severs, do we need to open port (1433) for NODE IPs too ?
Or is it enough if we open the port 1433 only for VIRTUAL IP ?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
Hi. I'm a SQL Server novice, so apologies if any of this sounds simple.I am running Windows XP SP2, and have just installed SQLServer 2000. Ineed another application to connect to SQLServer, and am specifying itto do so via localhost:1433, but keep getting an error whenever I trydoing so saying it cannot connect to the database. A colleague of minehas the exact same set up on his machine, and he can connect to SQLServer fine. Running 'netstat -a' at the command line on his machinereveals that the system is listening to port 1433/ms-sql-s. Runningnetstat on my machine shows that the system is not listening to1433/ms-sql-ms. I have checked in Network Config in SQLServerEnterprise Manager, and TCP/IP is set to be using 1433.To confirm this, my application can connect over the network to mycolleague's SQL Server. but he cannot connect over the network to mine.So I'm pretty sure the issue is related to this 1433/ms-sql-s problem.Does anyone know how to resolve this? Many thanks.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 21, 2006
I'm working on a completely virgin install of SQL Server 2k in Windows 2003.
Just after install I check that the TCP/IP protocol is enabled under the
server properties and then I try to Telnet into port 1433. On this one
particular box I get back the following:
C:>telnet localhost 1433
Connecting to localhost...Could not open connection to the host, on port
1433: Connect failed.
For comparison I tested telnet on a couple other machines and I get back a
blank window ready for my commands, as I'd expect.
I've checked the firewall settings and other IP Filtering settings to see if
any of those were blocking traffic to 1433... nothing. I've triple checked
the SQL Server settings for any "problems" and nothing jumps out at me.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 23, 2015
We have 2 clustered SQL instances (2 physical servers in each cluster). Instance2 needs to be setup as a linked server on Instance1.
At this time port 1433 between them is not open. I am referring to the port on the network switch, not in the Windows Firewall (ports in Windows Firewall are already open).
Is opening the port between virtual IP-s sufficient? Or does port need to be open between all physical source/destination IP-s as well?
View 12 Replies
View Related
Dec 12, 2004
Got a SQL Server 200 with two instances
1.SEAWEED
2.SEAWEEDUAT
After a recent reboot, both my instances weren't able to be registered using Enterprise Manager or by clients.
Both MSSQL and SQL Server Agent on both instances run using a domain account user and were running.
Looking at some microsoft articles, i changed the Services on both instance
under a domain administrator account.
Now i am only able to register the default instance while the named instance keeps coming up with SuperSocket Info: Bind failed on TCP port 1078
Also created a DNS alias for the named instance but this did not resolve the issue.
Does anyone have any solutions/ideas of a quick fix/ workaround ?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 27, 2001
I have heard that when installing Win2K sp2 and SQL 2000 sp2 they should be done in a certain order. Does anyone know anything about this?
Thanks!
JJ
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 17, 2007
Need url on good kb or article on converting sql 2000 to sql 2005 (full version not express)
Thanks,
Michael Oard
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2008
Hi,
I have SQL Server 2000 installed on my Windows XP (SP2) machine. I have the port set to 1433 (under Server Network Utility-->General-->TCP/IP). Here's the problem: when i run
netstat -anb
nothing is running on port 1433. What i DO have is this:
TCP 0.0.0.0:1036 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING
[sqlservr.exe]
Before I rebooted my computer it was running on port 1032. Anyone have any idea why this is happening? Thanks.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 29, 2001
I want to know how people are backup up their win2k system and SQL 2000 server. If you want a run backup once a night and first backup win2k file system and then run backup using sql agent will that work?
Thanks.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Hi allI'm struggling to find an answer to this one!We've configured our SQL boxes to run under a different port number,e.g. from 1433 to 4533. This works fine under our Citrix enviornmnetwhere the dsn is configured to use the new port. The problem comes interms of SQL Server management. For example, when you try andconfigure SQL Replication, it is not possible to add the subscriberunless the SQL Servce runs under port 1433, the default port. Thesame goes when you try to add the server as a registered server withinthe Enterprise Manager MMC.Does anyone know how you can configure SQL Server to run under adifferent port number, without naffecting SQL REPLICATION, etc?Many thnaksNikJoin Bytes!
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 25, 2007
cant connect to sql server 2000 from c# 2003
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 3, 2007
The DTS package would execute and immediately fail. a reboot of this server fixed the problems, but does anyone know how to get more info out of DTS to state why it failed, we have branch on error and NT event log entries, but nothing specific to state why. The 1st task is to assign global variables, but I'm not even sure it got that far.
Obviously the problem is fixed now, but if it happens again, some ideas of how to get data out would be useful.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 12, 2007
Job is failing for one DB
I receive below errors
EVENT LOG:
sql server scheduled job 'db name'
(0x5EA2833965097647B1D375899CE3E179)-Status Failed-Invoked on 2007-12-09 00:01-Message: The Job Failed.The job was invoked by schedule1 (sunday 12 am) . The last step to run was step 2(db name)
Job History:
step 1:
Excuted as user NT AUTHORITYSYSTEM. The step succeeded
step 2:
Excuted as user: NT AUTHORITYSYSTEM . Invalid object name '#DiskSize'.[SQL STATE 42S02][Error 208]. The step failed.
step 3:
The job failed. The job was invoked by Schedule 1 (sun 12 am). The last step to run was step 2{db name}
I am new to SQL server, please help?
Thanks in advance
View 7 Replies
View Related
Nov 13, 2007
I have SQL Server 2000 DTS package
There are four task
1. creating a temp table by joing different table on same server server 1.
2. Truncate table on Server 2
3. Transform data from Server 1 to server 2.
4. do update on table in Server 2.
I have full access to server 1 and 2. it works fine for me. When one of our developer, she doesn't have rights on server 1.
whenever she runs dts package it not showing any error but dts successfully completed. but there data is not poluated on server 2.
if she run task by task, task 1 failed reason log in failed, that's is correct that what we expect
but when run as package it is not failing, dts reported success, on popup window shows all task not run
is there any setting that tells DTS to fail if any task is failed. or any form of notification.
we can't use sa for connection, we have to use windows login only, we are looking for a solution that will tell us dts failed.
thanks
Kal
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 13, 2007
Job is failing for one DB
I receive below errors
EVENT LOG:
sql server scheduled job 'db name'
(0x5EA2833965097647B1D375899CE3E179)-Status Failed-Invoked on 2007-12-09 00:01-Message: The Job Failed.The job was invoked by schedule1 (sunday 12 am) . The last step to run was step 2(db name)
Job History:
step 1:
Excuted as user NT AUTHORITYSYSTEM. The step succeeded
step 2:
Excuted as user: NT AUTHORITYSYSTEM . Invalid object name '#DiskSize'.[SQL STATE 42S02][Error 208]. The step failed.
step 3:
The job failed. The job was invoked by Schedule 1 (sun 12 am). The last step to run was step 2{db name}
I am new to SQL server, please help?
Thanks in advance
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 19, 2007
Hi Folks,
I have been struggling with a problem for the last couple days now regarding MSTD and distributed transactions. The main issue is that 3 servers are each sitting in a different domain. Non of the domains trust each other.
As of yesterday, I could get all the SQL 2005 chatting to each other using MSDTC without a problem. However, I have a SQL 2000 box which refuses to work. A normal query across a linked server works fine. A distributed transaction will not work. This is the case from A to B and B to A.
I have tested with DTCPing and it says all is ok.
The error messages are:
SQL 2000 > SQL 2005
OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "T-ServerTServer" returned message "No transaction is active.".
Msg 7391, Level 16, State 2, Line 2
The operation could not be performed because OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "T-ServerTServer" was unable to begin a distributed transaction.
And the other way round:
[OLE/DB provider returned message: New transaction cannot enlist in the specified transaction coordinator. ]
OLE DB error trace [OLE/DB Provider 'SQLOLEDB' ITransactionJoin::JoinTransaction returned 0x8004d00a].
Msg 7391, Level 16, State 1, Line 2
The operation could not be performed because the OLE DB provider 'SQLOLEDB' was unable to begin a distributed transaction.
If watching the DTC monitor, it shows an active transaction then goes back to 0.
All instances are on a 4 node cluster with 3 nodes turned off for the testing.
I have run out of things to try. Most of the symptoms for the above messages are to do with DTC security, the Turn RPC Security Off reg hack. All instances and OS (W2K3) are the latest updates / patches.
As for the 3rd server, SQL 2005, it is happy to talk
Anybody got a gem which I can try?
Edit: Both SQL 2005 servers are x64 while the 2000 is x86
Cheers,
Crispin
View 3 Replies
View Related
