In always on under availability group server name properties can see the option Readable Secondary. In that for secondary server the Readable Secondary Option is YES and for Primary it is Read-Intent. I believe Read-Intent allows only read only connections and YES allows all user connections.
What exactly it means for the primary and secondary?
In always on under availability group server name properties can see the option Readable Secondary. In that for secondary server the Readable Secondary Option is YES and for Primary it is Read-Intent. I believe Read-Intent allows only read only connections and YES allows all user connections.
I have been working with a BI colleague to access the readable secondary through SSRS. For some reason it keeps complaining that ApplicationIntent is not recognized keyword. I am starting to think it's something to do with the driver for SSRS.
I have an AlwaysOn Availability group configured between 2 nodes (Synchronous)
Automatic failover was working fine until recently
I can failover between the nodes manually but automatic failover doesn't seem to be working. In my earlier test, I would shut down the SQL Service on the primary and within seconds, the secondary replica would take over. Recently I have performed the same test and the secondary replica enters the resolving state and the DB in unavailable.
I have tried everything here: [URL] ....
The only change I made was changing the availability mode from Synchronous to Asynchronous - Could that be the cause?
I have a SP that runs on the primary in 18 min and 45 min on the secondary( poorly written cursor,trying to fix it).Both machines are Exactly the same.I ran them in the middle of the night when no one was on the Sec. Node as we use it for reporting.
PLE: 7,000+ AVG Disk sec/write below .01 AVG Disk sec/read below .01 CPU below 5% both machines set a max dop 4
Secondary replica database(setup in async mode) of AlwaysON went in "restricted mode" during weekly reindex operation.
So I have tried below steps
1) Executed following statement on the same secondary replica database where the issue exists
alter database <DBNAME> set multi_user with rollback immediate
but it failed with the error saying "The operation cannot be performed on database "dbname" because it is involved in a database mirroring session or an availability group. Some operations are not allowed on a database that is participating in a database mirroring session or in an availability group. ALTER DATABASE statement failed."
2) Primary database is multi_user but still tried following command on primary replia database(thinking it will replicate)
alter database <DBNAME> set multi_user
but no luck. The secondary alwaysON database shows (synchronizing) as the alwaysON is set in async mode but the command doesn't replicate across secondary
so we are left with the only option to re-setup alwaysON but I want to avoid it as database size is huge..
What happens when an automatic failover occurs, in a two server AlwaysOn Availability Group configuration, where the secondary replica is configured as read-only?
Will it only allow read-only connections, or will it become read-write and can accept INSERT, UPDATES and DELETES when assigned the new role as Primary?
Is it correct that adding a third server/node, that just acts as passive and should be used for automatic failover, to support true HADR, would NOT need another license .. and that licenses would only be required for the previous Primary and Secondary (Read-Only) replicas?
I was working on a job to send me info each morning about database file free space and was noticing some odd things when looking at the log file VLFs for one of my databases in an AlwaysOn availability group.When I run DBCC LOGINFO on the secondary replica for this database, I get what I expect and most VLFs have a status of 0 (indicating the VLFs are reusable or unused). When I run DBCC LOGINFO on the primary replica, all of the VLFs have a status of 2 (active or recoverable).
Since log backups on the secondary replica in AlwaysOn still truncate the log in the primary replica, I would expect that the VLFs in the primary replica would also be mostly in a reusable or unused state. My log file sizes are the same size on each server and my backups are completing successfully. what might be causing the VLFs on the primary replica to have a status of 2 in DBCC LOGINFO when taking log backups from the secondary replica?
I know now that AlwaysOn feature HAS to be installed/configured on a Windows Clustering environment, BUT the secondary replicas, like the Disaster recovery replica residing in a different Data Center HAS to be also in a Windows Clustering environment or can it reside on a SINGLE SQL Server INSTANCE?.
i have created a new login in primary server and provided dbowner permission to primary db.how do i transfer this login to secondary server and assign the same permission to secondary db ?
We had a big issue today during maintenance work in our SQL environment.
So our environment: - 2x SQL Server 2014 Enterprise on Windows Server 2012 R2 (SRV1 and SRV2) -- Both Hyper-V VMs on different Hosts -- Both configured to an Windows Failover Cluster and AlwaysOn Availability Group (AG1) -- AG Listener: AG1_lis -- No shared storage (each Hyper-V Host has its own local storage) -- Asynchronous Mode -- SRV1 is primary, SRV2 is secondary SQL node
What happened? - Shutting down Windows on SRV2 due hardware maintenance - Cluster goes offline, AG1 goes offline -- Error message: "Stopped listening on virtual network name 'AG1_lis'." -- Error message: "The availability group database "DatabaseXY" is changing roles from "PRIMARY" to "RESOLVING" because the mirroring session or availability group failed over due to role synchronization."
Results? - AG1_lis wasn't available for our applications and they stopped working properly because database connection was lost!
I think, I HOPE, this is not the normale behaviour when one node is shutting down (especially the secondary node!)
I noticed that after a SQL AlwaysOn failover, one of the DB in the secondary replica is stuck in Restoring state. The primary replica shows that it is in a synchronized state. These are the error logs from SSMS. How do I trace the cause of the problem?
Error: 5901, Severity: 16, State: 1. Nonqualified transactions are being rolled back in database for an AlwaysOn Availability Groups state change. Estimated rollback completion: 0%. This is an informational message only. No user action is required Error: 18400, Severity: 16, State: 1.
One or more recovery units belonging to database failed to generate a checkpoint. This is typically caused by lack of system resources such as disk or memory, or in some cases due to database corruption. Examine previous entries in the error log for more detailed information on this failure.
The background checkpoint thread has encountered an unrecoverable error. The checkpoint process is terminating so that the thread can clean up its resources. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
I recently configured SQL Server 2012 AlwaysOn Availability group using two nodes - a primary and one secondary read only replica. The group is residing on a windows 2012 cluster with an smb file share as the quorum. I am able to successfully failover through SQL and through the windows 2012 cluster. When I look at the group dashboard on the primary server and view the Operational state of each node I notice an odd value. The secondary role server is listed as Unknown. I also noticed that the Availability replicas node icons in object explorer are displaying the same icon on the primary server but on the secondary server, the primary server is shown as a server with a question mark.
Am I missing a permissions setting or is this normal behavior.
For example:
ServerA is the primary ServerB is the secondary ServerA lists the servers in Object Explorer as:
ServerA (Primary)ServerB (Secondary) ServerB lists the servers in Object Explorer as:
ServerA ServerB (Secondary)
The primary is never listed a primary on the secondary server. Again failovers are working properly, but I want to be sure I am not missing a setting somewhere.
I have a two node HA Always on group using a Listener. I would like to force a certain AD group to always be forced to the secondry node as they would only ever need to run select statements. If there an easy way to do this without using logon triggers?
in my secondary server the database which is in restoring state , when i checked in always on dash board "This secondary database is not joined to the availability group" ,
I am after T-SQL code which will simply load the next T-log backup file from a network share folder to a warm standby db on a secondary server.What is needed is a Third server (server x), to participate in log shipping (MULTIPLE TARGETS).
Primary SERVER (SERVER A) Secondary SERVER (SERVER B) Log shipped to via GUI. THIRD SERVER (SERVER X) which will contain the same log shipped db from server A.
This will simply restore the logs from a network share to keep the db up to date.
"If we fail over a SQL AG group on a failover cluster from one node to another making the secondary the new primary, is there any reason why we would have to fail it back over to the old primary node?"
2 Boxes in HA, identical hardware (VMs) and both utilising identical storage systems (Nimble SANs).Was needing to do a copy only backup of a few databases for an escrow environment we have, so decided to perform this on the secondary box.Small ~10GB ish database first, seemed to be really slow, so opened resource monitor and noticed that disk read / write was getting limited to about 15MB/s so took a little while (the big one is over 1TB)
Tried this again on the primary it was done in seconds disk rate in the order of 250MB/s (same settings re compression etc).. I decided to make a copy of the backup file on the secondary, the copy disk to disk went in the region of 150MB/s , so it appears that SQL Server is the bottleneck?
Windows 2012 R2, SQL 2012 (Primary Replica) SQL 2012 (Seondary Replica) SQL 2012 (Secondary Replica over WAN site)
There are database replicating on three SQL servers. WAN line is having performance issue because of limited bandwidth I have to remove SQL secondary replica over WAN site temporarily and add it again later when the WAN line is upgraded with between bandwidth What is the best practice to remove secondary replica and replicating database and add later from SQL management studio without interruptions on databases?
Do we have any way to insert,update,delete data from one table and update the changes onto second table. Also, while updating records into second table, can the data be encrypted.
I tried using view and it can insert, update, delete without any issues. But if i tried to encrypt any fields after inserting data into view, I am unable to do it.
CREATE Tableb_vw ON TableB Instead of Insert AS Begin update TableA set Lname = ( --UserName = 'User' + substring(convert(varchar(32), UsersTrID), 1, 8) SELECT REPLACE(LEFT(Lname, 2), '''', 'Z') AS LNAME) FROM TableA end
What I would like to get:
1. Can we update base tables and encrypt second table data while inserting or updating data 2. If not supported using base tables, can we do using views to encrypt view data [Some fields]
I checked the server and found that LS restore job failing and Backup and copy jobs running fine without any issue. and also observed that Copy folder the trn file existing on secondary server. i try to restore trn file im getting the error. and observed that last log backup file that it restored at the secondary database on May2nd,2015.
2015-06-02 12:25:00.72*** Error: The log in this backup set begins at LSN 761571000000022500001, which is too recent to apply to the database. An earlier log backup that includes LSN 721381000002384200001 can be restored.
From Restore job histort details below.
Message 2015-06-02 12:25:00.72*** Error: The file 'xxxx\_20150530104503.trn' is too recent to apply to the secondary database 'database'.(Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.LogShipping) *** 2015-06-02 12:25:00.72*** Error: The log in this backup set begins at LSN 761571000000022500001, which is too recent to apply to the database. An earlier log backup that includes LSN 721381000002384200001 can be restored. RESTORE LOG is terminating abnormally.(.Net SqlClient Data Provider) *** 2015-06-02 12:25:00.73Searching for an older log backup file. Secondary Database: 'database' 2015-06-02 12:25:00.73*** Error: Could not find a log backup file that could be applied to secondary database 'database'.(Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.LogShipping) *** 2015-06-02 12:25:00.74Deleting old log backup files. Primary Database: 'database'
In my environment always on is there. Today I observed that primary server fail over to secondary server .now the secondary server acting as primary role.
Can I know when is fail over is happened and who did the fail over. Is there any script to find this?
We have 3rd party app that dumps data into a repository Database for use in onward reporting purposes.When a user runs jobs in the app, the app creates new tables in the repository DB.The names of the new tables are created at runtime and unpredictable.
For reporting purposes, I then need to create more new tables/views that depend on these repository tables.As the table names will be unknown until they are created, I have created Stored Procedures to address.The Procedures look through information_schema, identify the tables created by the app, and then create new tables/views based on them.The stored procedures are called using a small tool made with MSAcess.
Problem is when it comes to our Integ & Production servers.My stored procedure will be doing a lot of create/alter/drop actions.Requesting ddladmin on production databases I know is going to set of a lot of alarms.
I need select users to use the MSAccess tool & trigger the Stored Procs that will execute DDL actions.
I'm setting up my first pair of Sql 2012 servers using AlwaysOn. I set up backups to run on the primary and I understand that you can set up backups to run on both the primary and secondary servers but the secondary will fail. Is there a way I can stop the secondary server from sending out error messages about failed backups? Is it possible to script it so that the server looks at whether it's primary or secondary and turns on or off alerts based on that?
I am trying to build the 2 node 2 clusters with the AlwaysOn.
Here isthe landscape.
2 nodes PROD failover cluster (running once instance) 2 nodes DR failover cluster (running 2 instances - DR and PRE-PROD)
Both clusters are in different geographies.
PRE-PROD can be editable. So out of scope of Always On.
One instance on PROD -> DR of the other box. [Want to achive thru AlwaysON]
Now my Question:
1) Do i need to have all the 4 nodes in same failover cluster group? If yes, then this would become MultiSubnet cluster Or Is there any way those 2 diffrerent failover clusters (one DR and one PROD) can be part of AlwaysOn.
2) Can i use the clustered disks as in the above landscape for always on?