SQL 2012 :: AlwaysOn With Clustered Disks
Mar 13, 2014
I am trying to build the 2 node 2 clusters with the AlwaysOn.
Here isthe landscape.
2 nodes PROD failover cluster (running once instance)
2 nodes DR failover cluster (running 2 instances - DR and PRE-PROD)
Both clusters are in different geographies.
PRE-PROD can be editable. So out of scope of Always On.
One instance on PROD -> DR of the other box. [Want to achive thru AlwaysON]
Now my Question:
1) Do i need to have all the 4 nodes in same failover cluster group? If yes, then this would become MultiSubnet cluster Or Is there any way those 2 diffrerent failover clusters (one DR and one PROD) can be part of AlwaysOn.
2) Can i use the clustered disks as in the above landscape for always on?
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
May 12, 2015
OS Windows Server 2012
SQL 2012
I have a software that presents a drive to a 2 node cluster.
Not sure how I would go about presenting this newly presented drive as a Cluster Resource and make SQL depend on this resource.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2014
Why I see absolutely no performance improvement when I spread my primary file group over 8 separate files on 8 separate disks, as opposed to having the primary file group all in one file on one disk.
I have set up 2 identical databases, one spread over 8 disks and one on one disk. Each database has a table called DATA and a column called VALUE. Value is NVARCHAR(200). I have filled each table up in both databases with 20,000 rows.
I then perform a select on each table in each database using CHECKPOINT and DBCC DROPCLEANBUFFERS to ensure I am reading from disk before each query and the execution times are identical in both databases.
I then ran the same queries against each database using a load testing tool and the batch requests per second on each DB is identical under load.
Surely the database with data spread over 8 disks should be FAR faster than the single file database as you have the combined reading power of 8 disks as opposed to 2??
Also, the same is happening for write speeds. When I create the data on both databases, the time it takes is identical on both.
BOL says it should be faster with multiple disks.
Just FYI this is on an Azure virtual machine and each disk is a locally redundant data disk that I have attached to the virtual machine.
Whether write speeds should increase with multiple disks or just read speeds?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Sep 9, 2014
I am getting following errors in my Cluster Validation report when trying to create a Windows Cluster.
I have 2 nodes DB01 and DB02 . Each has 1 public ip, 1 private ip (for heartbeat), 2 private ips for SAN1 and SAN2. The private ip's to SAN are directly connected via Network Adaptor in DB01 and DB02.
Validate Microsoft MPIO-based disks
Description: Validate that disks that use Microsoft Multipath I/O (MPIO) have been configured correctly.
Start: 9/9/2014 1:57:52 PM.
No disks were found on which to perform cluster validation tests.
Stop: 9/9/2014 1:57:53 PM.
[Code] ...
View 9 Replies
View Related
Nov 24, 2014
What is the easiest way to remember the definitions of clustered and non clustered indexes.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jun 27, 2015
I am wondering what would be the best disk/RAID setup for a Windows server 2008 R2 OS and SQL Server 2012 database that has heavy read/write. I have the following disks I can use:
4x 15k 146GB
2x 10k 600GB
According to the server build requirements for the application, I need 100GB for the OS and 290GB for the drive containing the SQL mdf there are no stated requirements for the ldf, but would like to know if it should be allocated elsewhere?I should do RAID 10 for the 15k drives for SQL and RAID 1 for the OS on the 10k.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 17, 2014
I am testing out a blank database created over two physical files on two separate disks with one table called data which has one column called values nvarchar(max).
I filled the table up with a whole load of data and ran a select * against it. If I run Permon at the same time I can see that the read load has been spread over multiple disks as each of these disks is getting read from in parallel. If I create the same database on a single file and run the same select * again it takes much longer, proving that the read load has been distributed across multiple disks.
Now moving onto writes, this is where the confusion lies. I understand that SQL server fills files evenly until they need growing, after which it will then fill files individually until they are full in a round robin fashion unless you have trace 1117 turned on. What I don't understand is why the writes aren't distributed out whilst it is filling these file groups.
I ran an continual insert into my table with go 1000000 to monitor how the files are being filled up. I monitored where SQL server was physically placing the files as they were being inserted by running the following query:
;WITH CTE AS
(SELECT
sys.fn_PhysLocFormatter (%%physloc%%) col1,
RIGHT(LEFT(sys.fn_PhysLocFormatter (%%physloc%%),2),1) AS [Physical RID],
DATAID
[Code] ....
I could see that it would a thousand or so records into file 1, then a thousand or so into file 2, then a thousand or so into file 1 etc etc. In another words it would hit one disk, then another disk, then back to disk one to fill the file evenly. Is there any way to make SQL Server distribute the writes out in parallel so that both disks are writing in tandem?
By the looks of it, multiple disks only scale reads, as with writes only one disk is ever written to at once which is annoying. Any way to harness the write power of multiple disks?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Aug 18, 2014
How to find the pending transactions to be applied on secondary in Always On? Can i get those details from dashboard?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 22, 2014
We are looking to setup an AlwaysOn A/G between two SQL instances across two SQL clusters - one cluster has two nodes the other has three nodes.
Is this possible using WSFC? Does the A/G wizard just handle this?
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 13, 2013
I'm setting up my first pair of Sql 2012 servers using AlwaysOn. I set up backups to run on the primary and I understand that you can set up backups to run on both the primary and secondary servers but the secondary will fail. Is there a way I can stop the secondary server from sending out error messages about failed backups? Is it possible to script it so that the server looks at whether it's primary or secondary and turns on or off alerts based on that?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Apr 11, 2014
We have 2 SQL 2012 servers. Our application has 2 databases. We are creating an AlwaysOn cluster. Is it good to create 2 AlwaysOn clusters to have 1 database primary on one of the servers and the other database primary on the other server?
I have been asked if it is possible to have one database running on one server and the other database on the other server. Is this possible without creating 2 separate AlwaysOn clusters?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 14, 2014
While configuring SQL Server 2012 Cluster with Always on, why do we need two secondary replicas.
The attached link will describe the actual query. [URL] ....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 28, 2014
I have an A & B node set up and running. I now want to add a C NODE.
The catch is the C NODE is in a SQL Cluster Environment.
I am guessing I add the Virtual Name of the C node to the current Always ON Cluster?
I tried adding it...the error message says" the Virtual Node is really the A node and to add the A NODE"?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 24, 2015
What are differences between always on and SQL Server Clustering
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 23, 2013
We have 4 Servers which have SQL SERVER 2012 and "AlwaysOn" have been enabled on all 4 servers:
Server1,Server2,Server3,Server4
Server1 is the Primary node and thr rest are secondaries. There is a Sync relation between Server1 and Server2 and also there is aSync relation between Server1 and Server3 & Server4.
Is it possible to setup log shipping from Server2 & Server3(secondaries) to two new servers?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2014
I have four instances and each instance have its own Availability Group with its own listener.
Would like to know if you can have one listener for multiple Availability groups?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 17, 2014
How many nodes can you have in a cluster with SQL 2012 alwaysOn.
I understand that availability groups are limited to 5 nodes but if you had a 10 node cluster and decided to create multiple availability groups using various nodes within the 10 nodes but never exceeding 5, is that possible?
Or is there a counter or some validation from SQL AlwaysOn that actually hard limits to a grand total of 5 nodes in a cluster?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 28, 2014
We had 3 Availability Groups set up in SQL 2012 last year but they were poorly named so I am just looking to rename them but there doesn't seem to be any command for it that I can find.Can they not be renamed once created? I guess I could just create new ones and move the DB's into them but just thought I would check!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 18, 2014
Considering trying to move 2008 acitve/passive cluster with log ship to day old read only 2008 server to 2012 active/passive to 2012 AG Read only server. Only problem is that read only instance may have to be a 2nd instance on a server. The new box is a beast 64 core 256 gig of RAM hp so this is no dog. So I have these choices
migrate 2008 active/passive cluster to 2012 active passive (this will be it's own ordeal)take new monster box and build two instances, one that will run the AG read only database, the other will house reporitng services and analysis services and a few dw databases. We are not heavy into deep dive analysis services yet kind of in it's infancy. Not sure if this other instance will be sql 2008R2 , may be able to do 2012. MY also have a few small sharepoint databases but they barely use it.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 21, 2014
In always on under availability group server name properties can see the option Readable Secondary. In that for secondary server the Readable Secondary Option is YES and for Primary it is Read-Intent. I believe Read-Intent allows only read only connections and YES allows all user connections.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Aug 21, 2014
In always on under availability group server name properties can see the option Readable Secondary. In that for secondary server the Readable Secondary Option is YES and for Primary it is Read-Intent. I believe Read-Intent allows only read only connections and YES allows all user connections.
What exactly it means for the primary and secondary?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 30, 2014
I'm setting up AG replication over our WAN (1GB MPLS). Using sql stress, AG replication quickly falls behind. Network throughput plateaus at ~14Mbs.
The problem ISN'T NETWORK
using conventional mirroring, the same workload never falls behind, throughput plateaus at ~26Mbs.
it's almost like log stream compression isn't happening for AG...
both mirroring and AG are using async.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 13, 2014
Can we make SQL 2012 Always ON over the normal SQL Cluster 2012.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 10, 2014
I have setup SQL AlwaysOn between primary and DR data centers. Here is the setup:
Primary data center: Server1 (Primary), Server2 (Sync Commit Secondary), Server3 (ASync Commit Secondary)
DR data center: Server4 (ASync Commit Secondary)
Data synchronization and manual failover works fine. But, sometimes, the AlwaysOn cluster automatically fails over to Sync Commit Secondary on Primary data center. Here is the error message from Failover Cluster Manager->Cluster Events:
"Cluster has missed two consecutive heartbeats for the local endpoint xx.xx.xx.yy:~3343~ connected to remote endpoint xx.xx.xx.zz:~3343~"
"Cluster has lost the UDP connection from local endpoint xx.xx.xx.yy:~3343~ connected to remote endpoint xx.xx.xx.zz:~3343~"
I had our network engineer check all connections multiple times and he confirmed everything is fine. But he was also able to confirm (using monitoring tools) that right at the time of a failover, there is almost 2GB worth of traffic going from Primary Server to DR server. That happens every time. I had checked the times of all failovers and there is no job or process occuring that will produce 2GB worth of data. Also, this happens regardless of which server is primary.
Even though the failover works fine, this unexpected automatic failover due to missed heartbeats are occurring often (2-3 times a month).
Here is the list of errors from the Cluster Validation Report:
Under Network Section, I see the following error messages in Red:
Validate Network Communication
Network interfaces Server4 (DR) - SAN_Team and Server1 (Primary) - SAN_Team - VLAN 20 are on the same cluster network, yet address xx.xx.xx.pp is not reachable from xx.xx.xx.yy using UDP on port 3343.
Network interfaces Server4 (DR) - SAN_Team and Server2 (Secondary) - SAN_Team - VLAN 20 are on the same cluster network, yet address xx.xx.xx.qq is not reachable from xx.xx.xx.yy using UDP on port 3343.
[Code] ....
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jan 27, 2015
So I have 2 servers S1 & S2.
Database Group 1 = L1 with Primary S1 and Secondary S2
Database Group 2 = L2 with Primary S2 and Secondary S1
For 99% of the time the 2 groups of databases are not related. For the 1 procedure that does move data from L1 to L2 something like
Update L2.DB.Owner.Table
set flag = 1
Whare a = 0
On S1 I have a linkedServer with connection to L2.
If I have a failover I cannot have L2 on S2 as they are essentially the same server.
How to I use the 2 groups hand in hand.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Mar 1, 2015
In always on docs in msdn they mention only about backup of secondary.. explain the backup of primary or how logs are managed in primary database. My doubt is a normal database in full recovery mode the log file will grow if we didnt take proper log backup,how the same is managed in primary in Always On.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 2, 2015
We have a database in an AlwaysOn Availability Group that has gone into a state of Not Synchronizing / Suspect on the secondary.
The reason why this happened is because the secondary ran out of disk space so the log file wasn't able to be written to. The database was set to synchronous mode.
Is the only way to recover from this to do a re-initialization or is there another way to recover?
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 14, 2015
Give the Advantages Over SQL SERVER Always on over Clustering....
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 19, 2015
We have an existing SQL Server 2012 Enterprise cluster with 2 nodes (active-active) and uses Windows 2008 R2 OS. We are looking for a way to increase HA as well as offload backups to secondary server and it was suggested that AlwayOn could be an option.
The questions I have are:
1) Is it possible to turn on AalwaysOn feature on an existing cluster?
2) If yes to above, does the secondary replica need to exist as a node on the same cluster or can it be on a completely different cluster?
3) If the secondary replica is on the same cluster (i.e. we add a 3rd node to existing 2 node cluster), can that node be provisioned with storage from a completely different SAN? (i.e. Node 1 and Node 2 accesses LUNs on SAN1 and Node 3 accesses LUNs on SAN2).
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jun 11, 2015
I am trying to setup an AG on a cluster, I was able to define where I want my replica, but I need to setup the ip for the listener of that one
When I am adding the Ip at the listener I am getting the following message:
The Windows Server Failover Clustering (WSFC) resource control API returned error code 5057. The WSFC service may not be running or may not be accessible in its current state, or the specified arguments are invalid. For information about this error code, see "System Error Codes" in the Windows Development documentation.
The attempt to create the network name and IP address for the listener failed. The WSFC service may not be running or may be inaccessible in its current state, or the values provided for the network name and IP address may be incorrect. Check the state of the WSFC cluster and validate the network name and IP address with the network administrator. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 41009)
Browsing around I found this guide: [URL] ......
And I make sure that the cluster has permissions to "Read all properties", "Create Computer Objects", even to "Create all child" permissions
I also added those permissions to the account that starts sql at that cluster and I am logged as that and I am still getting the error....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 26, 2015
We are planning to upgrade our production servers from mirroring to alwayson. Our current mirror setup gives the advantage that it can failover a single database.To have a similar setup in alwayson we are probably going to create an availability group per database. Any other disadvantage in this except for the extra initial configuration work?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jul 9, 2015
Currently we have an AlwaysOn AG set up with a listener running on port 1433 (underlying instances are on a non default port). Great, no problems there.If we set up a second AG on the same instance with its own specific listener, can this new listener also be configured to use port 1433?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 29, 2015
How to configure AlwaysOn between two different network section?
View 2 Replies
View Related
