Looking to coalesce a WHERE clause with XML data. I cannot supply test data.
If 472 is null, check the NEXT XML field at grab the 150, if both 472 AND 150 do NOT exist let it be NULL.
set @Date = (select top 1 XL.value('(DTM/DTM.02/DTM.02.1)[1]', 'varchar(100)') from #src
where coalesce(XL.value('(DTM/DTM.01/DTM.01.1)[1]', 'varchar(50)') = '472', '(DTM/DTM.01/DTM.01.1)[1]', 'varchar(50)') = '150')
Need to multiply the following by 12 then divide this by 52.
,COALESCE(CTAX.[NET-AMT],0)+COALESCE(HEAT.[NET-AMT],0)+COALESCE(FURNIT.[NET-AMT],0)+COALESCE(SERVCH.[NET-AMT],0)+COALESCE(SEWER.[NET-AMT],0)+COALESCE(WATER.[NET-AMT],0) as 'weekly rent'Everywhere
I try and put the *12/52, I get errors.
I have a MDX query , where I have a date Range in where clause.
I want to replace it with Cuurent Date and Last 7 days date.
I tried multiple ways using NOW function , but could not get it correct .
modifying the Query so that I can fetch DATA for last 7 days
SELECT NON EMPTY { [Measures].[X] } ON COLUMNS, NON EMPTY { ([PRODUCT].[PRODUCT].[PRODUCT].ALLMEMBERS ) } DIMENSION PROPERTIES MEMBER_CAPTION, MEMBER_UNIQUE_NAME ON ROWS
FROM ( SELECT ( { [COLOR].[COLORName].&[BLACK], [COLOR].[COLORName].&[BLUE] } ) ON COLUMNS
FROM ( SELECT ( [Date].[Calendar].[Calendar Year].&[2015].&[2015]&[3].&[7].&[20150706] : [Date].[Calendar].[Calendar Year].&[2015].&[2015]&[2].&[6].&[20150629] ) ON COLUMNS
FROM [MYCUBE]))
I want to replace Date Hard code value , I have used Calendar Hierarchy of date dimension. to find Last 7 days Data.
I'm preparing a report that will display provider number, provider name, and a single field that will show all the counties that specific provider serves. I realize from researching the coalesce posts that this can be done. However, when I try to retrieve data in the same select statement as my coalesce, I get the error: "A SELECT statement that assigns a value to a variable must not be combined with data-retrieval operations."The listing of the counties must be specific to the provider, so my original code was:
DECLARE @Counties varchar(1000)
SET @Counties = ''
SELECT a.PROV_ID, a.PROV_NAME,
@Counties=coalesce(@Counties,'') + b.COUNTY + ','
from ECBH.dbo.tbl_PROVIDERS a inner join ECBH.dbo.tbl_Provider_Serv_Regions c
on a.PROV_ID = c.PROV_ID
inner join ECBH.dbo.tbl_Regions b
on b.REGION_ID = c.REGION_ID
where c.PROV_ID = a.PROV_ID
and a.MASTER = 1
I thought about creating a table to hold the coalesced values (need to coalesce two other fields as well), but wouldn't an insert to a table fail for the same reason?The counties table does not relate to the provider table, but does relate to a provider_county table (which in turn relates to the provider table).
I want to return a BIT from an outer join. I want the result type to be BIT. However, the usage of ISNULL is forbidden by code standards. The first expression returns an INT. Which of the bottom expressions do you think would work best in a query?
And why would ISNULL be absolutely forbidden? I was told that Microsoft deprecated it along with TINYINT, which I'm often prevented from using even when it's the appropriate data type.
DECLARE @x BIT;
DECLARE @default BIT = 1;
DECLARE @something sql_variant;
SELECT @something = COALESCE(@x, 1);
SELECT SQL_VARIANT_PROPERTY(@something, 'BaseType');
SELECT @something = COALESCE(@x, @default);
SELECT SQL_VARIANT_PROPERTY(@something, 'BaseType');
SELECT @something = COALESCE(@x, CAST(1 AS BIT));
SELECT SQL_VARIANT_PROPERTY(@something, 'BaseType');
We're getting
Msg 1013, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
The objects "MYTEST2.TEST" and "mytest.TEST" in the FROM clause have the same exposed names. Use correlation names to distinguish them.use of fully qualified names is allowed without having to alias them.One workaround is changing compatibility mode to 80.Is there another (startup flag?).Reason for no alias: MS Reportbuilder doesn't provide them when building queries
CREATE SCHEMA MYTEST;
go
CREATE SCHEMA MYTEST2;
go
CREATE TABLE MYTEST.TEST
[code]....
I need to update the account_status and show the audit in the ssrs report.
I wrote the following query in the ssrs report but when I click on refresh fields it is throwing error incorrect syntax near output
Declare @username nvarchar(50)
Declare @UserStatus Table
(id bigint,
Username nvarchar(50),
Oldaccount_status varchar(255),
Newaccount_status varchar(255))
[Code] .....
I have an SSIS package which uses variables and foreach loop containers so connect to multiple instances to retrieve config data. I am adding an extra step to include the port of each instance.
I used a select from a central table to get the connection strings, which is put into [User::Server2]
1) execute SQL task to collect the port
(DECLARE @portNumber NVARCHAR(10)
EXEC xp_instance_regread
@rootkey = 'HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE',
@key =
'SoftwareMicrosoftMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQLServerSuperSocketNetLibTcpIpAll',
@value_name = 'TcpPort',
@value = @portNumber OUTPUT
)
Which is then put into a variable @Portnumber
2) I then need to insert this into a certain server with a where clause including another variable
so something like
"INSERT INTO DBO.InstanceConfig VALUES ('"+@[User::Portnumber]+"') where Serverinstance = ('"+@[User::Server2]+"')
but it doesnt work like that.. is there an easier way
I have a temporary table #Temp with, among others, a column CountryCode and a column Lastname.I would like to change the ü that appears in some names to u (u umlaut to a plain u), but only for those that have the nationality 'Ned'
My code so far:
Update #Temp
set LastName = replace(Lastname, 'ü', 'ue') WHERE CountryCode = 'Ned'
This code deletes all entries in the column Lastname
I think it must be easy, but I keep staring at the code.
What to do?
From MS Dynamics NAV 2013 I get a lot of querries that have a where clause like this:
where [Field1] like @p1 and [Field1] < @p2.
Field1 is the only primary key field and clustered index. The query also has a TOP 50 clause.
@p1 is always a "Starts-With"-value (something like N'abc%').
The query plan uses a clustered index seek but the number of reads look more like a clustered index scan.
Depending on the table size I see 1M or more reads for these querries.
If I rebuild the query in SSMS, but replace the paramerters with actual values I only see a few reads.
I was able to reproduce the issue with a temp table. See code below.
Is there a way to make SQL Server use another strategy when using the parameterized query?
SQL Server Version is 11.0.3401.
if object_id('tempdb..#tbl') is not null
drop table #tbl;
create table #tbl
(
[No] nvarchar(20)
,[Description1] nvarchar(250)
[Code] ....
Right now I have to do something like this and it is time consuming every time I have to query a specific table...
SELECT lots_of_columns
FROM table
WHERE (column5 = '1' OR column6 = '1' OR column7 = '1' OR column8 = '1' OR column9 = '1' OR column10 = '1' OR column11 = '1' OR column12 = '1')
AND other_query_critiera_here
Typing out the OR statement gets long, time consuming and prone to errors because that first where line with all the ORs can sometimes have 20+ ORs in it. As some insight, the columns are text columns, sometimes they have data, sometimes they are NULL. Sometimes they have the same data (i.e., column5 and column6 and column12 could both have '1' as values).
How SQL calculates the estimated row count when < or > are used in the WHERE clause of a statement. For example:-
WHERE Created_Datetime_utc > CONVERT(DATETIME,'2014-10-14 10:00:00',102)
I know how the estimated number of rows are calculated when an = is used but I've been googling and cannot find anything about < and >.
I found a code snippet that use the curious following sintax on the creation of View:
CREATE VIEW [dbo].[vw_EvenValues]
AS
SELECT [TestColumn]
FROM [dbo].[TestTable]
WHERE [TestColumn] % 2 = 1
[code]....
IF [TestColumn] on the Select is varchar, then error occurs and say:"Conversion failed when converting for the varchar value 'A001' to data type int"
I would like to be able to combine the functionality of IN and LIKE in a WHERE clause. Although the simple AdventureWorks2012 example below illustrates the concept with 3 search criteria, the real-world example I need to apply the concept to has a couple dozen. This returns 50 rows, but requires multiple OR ... LIKE functions:
SELECT DISTINCT c.Name
FROM Sales.Store c
WHERE c.Name LIKE '% sports %'
OR c.Name LIKE '% exercise %'
OR c.Name LIKE '%toy%'
What I would like to do is something like this, which doesn't work:
SELECT DISTINCT c.Name
FROM Sales.Store c
WHERE c.Name IN(LIKE '% sports %', LIKE '% exercise %', LIKE '%toy%')
I could load up a cursor and loop through it, but the syntax is more cumbersome than the multiple LIKE statements, not to mention most SQL programmers are horrified at the mention of the abominable word 'cursor' for performance reasons.
A while back, a "quirky update" method was proposed for lightning fast running totals based on the three-part MSSQL UPDATE's SET statement and tally tables. However, some claimed this was not 100% absolutely guaranteed behavior.
How does the new OVER clause compare in terms of performance ?
DECLARE @Tbl TABLE
(
pk int not null primary key identity,
N int
)
INSERT INTO @Tbl (N) SELECT TOP 1000 1 FROM syscolumns a CROSS JOIN syscolumns b
SELECT pk, SUM(pk) OVER (ORDER BY pk )
FROM @Tbl
I am creating a dynamic query where i am appending a where clause something like -
IF (@CurCaptureDate IS NOT NULL)
SET @where_clause = @where_clause + CHAR(10) + 'AND CD.CaptureDate = ' + @CurCaptureDate
PS - CD.CaptureDate is datetime and @CurCaptureDate is also datetime
but when executing , it gives this error - Msg 241, Level 16, State 1, Line 169 Conversion failed when converting date and/or time from character string.
i am not able to use convert here with these quotes.
i tried this - SET @where_clause = @where_clause + CHAR(10) + 'AND CD.CaptureDate = ' + CONVERT(VARCHAR(25),@CurCaptureDate )
but it makes it to -
AND CD.CaptureDate = Jul 19 2014 12:00AM. I would need the date in quotes.
Because of the way in which a specific piece of code is written, I'm bound into using a WHERE clause for a report generation.Each Inspection generates a unique Inspection Number. Any re-inspection created from that inspection is assigned that Inspection Number and appended with ".A", ".B", ".C" and so on.
The problem is this: Each row's Primary Key is the "InspectionId" in "dbo.v_InspectionDetailsReports". I need to return not only the data related to that particular InspectionId, but also the data related to any previous related inspection. For example, if I have a main number of CCS-2012 and three re-inspections, CCS-2012.A, CCS-2012.B and CCS-2012.C, and I report on CCS-2012.B, I need all the data for CCS-2012, CCS-2012.A and CCS-2012.B but NOT CCS-2012.C.
I would prefer to not have to do everything in a WHERE statement, but my hands are a bit tied.
The "SELECT * FROM dbo.v_InspectionDetailsReports WHERE . . ." is already hardcoded (don't ask).
SELECT *
FROM dbo.v_InspectionDetailsReports
WHERE ( RefOnly = 0
OR RefOnly IS NULL
[code]...
I am using an aggregate with the OVER clause.Running the script is fast less than 1 second but when I say insert into a temp table the execution plan is very different at it take 8 seconds.I have attached the execution plans. Also the Statistics IO, Time messages. I am using SQL Server 2014 with backward compatibility to 2008 R2.
if (select OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#MM')) is not null drop table #MM
CREATE TABLE #MM ([MyTableID] [int], [ParticipantID] [int], [ConferenceID] [nvarchar](50), [Points] [money], [DateCreated] [datetime], [StartPoints] [money], [EndPoints] [money], [LowPoints] [money], [HighPoints] [money])
insert into #MM ([MyTableID], [ParticipantID], [ConferenceID], [Points], [DateCreated], [StartPoints], [EndPoints], [LowPoints], [HighPoints])
selectmm.MyTableID, mm.ParticipantID, mm.ConferenceID, mm.Points, mm.DateCreated,
[code]....
From my one app, a dynamic where clause will generate like below.
//where ordercity='london' and orderby='smith'
//where orderamount > 100 and shipcity='new york'
From server, I created a store procedure as below.
SELECT * FROM [Order] WHERE @whereSql
How to complete the store procedure so that I don't need to pass parameters one by one...
I'm looking at various methods for deleting duplicate rows. Among the alternatives, one works just fine but gives me results that make me go?.
Consider this script:
declare @t table (a int, b int, c int, d int, e int)
insert into @t (a, b, c, d, e) values
(1, 2, 3, 4, 5),
(3, 4, 2, 3, 4),
(1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
select a,b,c,d,e, rn = row_number() over (
partition by a,b,c,d,e
[Code] ....
The code works -- that is, the duplicate row is deleted. However the output clause returns:
abcdern
123451
So....why? Why does the output clause show that the row with rn=1 was deleted, when the where clause stipulates rn > 1?
I have 10k indexes I need to rebuild and each time the script reaches an error it stops all further activity. How can I append 'GO' to the end of each line so it will continue on error messages?
Once I have the syntax I can do a find and replace function in Notepad++
USE [AdventureWorks2014] + char(13) + char(10) + GO
ALTER INDEX [IX_Person] ON [Person].[Person] REBUILD PARTITION = ALL WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF) + char(13) + char(10) + GO
ALTER INDEX [IX_Emp] ON [HumanResources].[Employee] REBUILD PARTITION = ALL WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF) + char(13) + char(10) + GO
************** Truncate ***********
How I am using a CASE statement within a WHERE clause to filter data:
CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.GetSomeStuff
@filter1 varchar(100) = '',
@filter2 varchar(100) = ''
AS
BEGIN
SELECT
[Code] .
What I want, is to be able to pass in a single value to filter the table, or if I pass in (at the moment a blank) for no filter to be applied to the table.
Is this a good way to accomplish that, or is there a better way? Also, down the line I'm probably going to want to have multiple filter items for a single filter, what would be the best way to implement that?
the code below works (this is only a quick dumbed down version of the actual code, it might not work 100% for all cases). Is it at all possible to exploit the functions that were added to SSQL since v. 2005 to simplify this code ?
In SSRS, a parameter allows the user to create a list of invoices (from CRM) to be ordered in any of the following ways the user prefers:
'Document Date (most recent date first)'
'Document Number (highest number first)'
'Document Date (most recent first) and Number'
'Document Number (lowest number first)'
The invoices have a (supposedly) sequential identity-generated number. However Accounting may want to set a different date than the creation date on some invoices. So there is no way the invoice numbers will be in the same sequence as the invoice dates.
So I just created the "sorting fields" - they appear as junk in the output dataset (just do not drop them in the SSRS tablix - they have to be part of the SELECT statement to be usable in the ORDER BY clause.
The code is:
DECLARE @ls_OrderBy varchar(80)
--'Document Number (highest number first)'
--'Customer and Document Date (most recent date first)'
--'Customer and Document Number (highest number first)'
--'Document Date (most recent first) and Number'
[code]....
I have a two tables each having a uniqueidentifier column person_id
I am trying to a select statement where I want a list of the person_id's in one table that are not in another table.
-- insert into wch_needed those who need checked
insert into #wch_needed (person_id, rendered_by )
select distinct e.person_id, e.rendered_by
from #wch_who o, encounter e
where o.person_id not in (select distinct person_id from #wch_have )
and o.person_id = e.person_id
the where conditional
where o.person_id not in (select distinct person_id from #wch_have )
does not work.
How can I do this?
I'm trying to write a query to select various columns from 3 tables. In the where clause I use a set of conditions, but most important condition is that I only want to see all results from the different columns where the ph.ProdHeaderDossierCode contains at least 25 lines of processed hours. I tried this with group by and having, but I constant get error messages on all other columns that I want to see: "is invalid in the select list because it is not contained in either an aggregate function or the GROUP BY clause". How can I make this so I can see all information I need?
Here is my code so far:
selectph.CalculatedTotalTime,
ph.ProdHeaderDossierCode,
ph.MachGrpCode,
ph.EmpId,
pd.PartCode
fromdbo.T_ProcessedHour ph,
[Code] ....
Usually it is better to include the columns in the index that are in where clause, select list and join.I am thinking that the columns in the selected list is better to keep as index columns and the columns that are in the where clause is better to keep in key columns.Where do we use join column is it better to create as main key column or included column.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI want to create the following scenario. I have a table that stores employees working on projects and their project hours by week, but now I also need a running total per week for each of those projects. For example take a look below:
EmployeeID, Project, Sunday, Monday, Tuesday,....Saturday, ProjectHours, TotalProjectHoursPerWeek(this is the column I am trying to derive), FiscalWeek
101, ProjectABC, 5,5,5,...5, 20, 40,25
102, ProjectXYZ 4,4,4,....4, 20 ,40,25
103,ProjectQWE, 2,2,2,...2, 8, 32,26
104, ProjectPOP, 6,6,6,...6, 24, 32,26
What I have tried so far:
Correlated Subquery:
SELECT EmployeeID,Project, Sunday, Monday,....Saturday, ProjectHours, SELECT(SUM(ProjectHours) FROM dbo.TableABC ap GROUP BY FiscalWeek),
FROM
dbo.TableABC a
I got this to work one time before, but now I am getting the following error:
Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression.
I can't understand why I get 2 different results on running with a Bracket I get 'NULL' and without a bracket I get the declared variable value which is 'Noname'
Below is Query 1:
Declare @testvar char(20)
Set @testvar = 'noname'
Select @testvar= pub_name
FROM publishers
WHERE pub_id= '999'
Select @testvar
Out put of this query is 'Noname'
BUT when I type the same query in the following manner I get Null-------Please note that the only difference between this query below is I used brackets and Select in the Select@testvar statement
Declare @testvar char(20)
Set @testvar = 'noname'
Select @testvar=(Select pub_name
FROM publishers
WHERE pub_id= '999')
Select @testvar
I am writing a stored procedure and have a query where I create a variable from other table
Declare @Sem varchar (12) Null
@Decision varchar(1) Null
Select emplid,name, Semester
Decision1=(select * from tbldecision where reader=1)
Decision2=(select * from tbldecision where reader=2)
Where Semester=@Sem
And Decision1=@Decision
But I am getting error for Decision1 , Decision2. How can I do that.
I have a pulldown menu which has like 4 options
producta productb productc and all
I am trying to retrieve the maximum build number value for these products and display on the gridview as per some other conditions like user selected OS etc
Now clicking on All, I want to display the maximum build number values for productA,ProductB ,ProductC
and I am trying to use coalesce but unable to get my result.
I end up seeing only one value which is the maximum of everything.Instead I want the maximums of A B and C and display them concatenated with commas.
If I do the following with no max funciton, i see all the values but i just want max from each branch.
DECLARE @buildList varchar(100)select @buildlist=COALESCE(@buildList + ', ', '') + convert(varchar(10),build) from results
where branch in ('ProductA','Product B','ProductC')
select @buildList
Please let me know how to do this.
I have a stored procedure which receives a dynamically built WHERE clause. This is then appended to the sql query within like....'select * from table' +@where_clause.
I know that I am possibly leaving myself open to sql injection so I wanted to find an alternate way of handling this. I stumbled across an article which speaks of using COALESCE as a way to sidestep using dynamic WHERE clauses....http://www.sqlteam.com/article/implementing-a-dynamic-where-clause
In my application the user can enter 1-to-many textboxes as search criteria. What I have been doing is a series of IF statements to determine if each textbox is populated or not and build the WHERE clause accordingly.If tx_lastname.Text <> "" Then
If (InStr(sqlwhere, "where")) Then
sqlwhere = sqlwhere & " AND lname like '" & tx_lastname.Text & "'"
Else
sqlwhere = " where lname like '" & tx_lastname.Text & "'"
End If
End If
If tx_firstname.Text <> "" Then
If (InStr(sqlwhere, "where")) Then
sqlwhere = sqlwhere & " AND fname like '" & tx_firstname.Text & "'"
Else
sqlwhere = " where fname like '" & tx_firstname.Text & "'"
End If
End IfAnd so forth. But the above article seems to insinuate that I provide a static WHERE clause like this...'select * from table WHERE LNAME = COALESCE(@lname, lname) and COALESCE(@fname, fname). And this would handle it.Have any of you ever used this before? This is my first question. My other question is could this particular method be made compatible to fit with the LIKE operator?My user needs to be able to search based on close matches. For instance, if they enter 'JOHN' in the last name field, the results should contain 'JOHN', 'JOHNSON', 'JOHNS', etc.Any help would be appreciated.
A few people have mentioned that i should use coalesce in the following statement. the problem is i don't know where i should be using itCan someone show me where i should place it? 1 SELECT (SELECT Location
2 FROM Location_Table
3 WHERE (Property_Table.LocationID = LocationID)) AS Location,
4 (SELECT TypeOfProperty
5 FROM Type_Table
6 WHERE (Property_Table.LocationID = TypeID)) AS TypeOfProperty, PropertyID, LocationID, TypeID, Title, Description, Price, Bedrooms
7 FROM Property_Table
8 WHERE (NULLIF (@MinPrice, 0) IS NULL) AND (NULLIF (@MaxPrice, 0) IS NULL) AND (NULLIF (@TypeID, 0) IS NULL) AND (NULLIF (@LocationID, 0) IS NULL) OR
9 (NULLIF (@MinPrice, 0) IS NULL) AND (NULLIF (@MaxPrice, 0) IS NULL) AND (NULLIF (@LocationID, 0) IS NULL) AND (TypeID = @TypeID) OR
10 (NULLIF (@MinPrice, 0) IS NULL) AND (NULLIF (@MaxPrice, 0) IS NULL) AND (NULLIF (@TypeID, 0) IS NULL) AND (LocationID = @LocationID) OR
11 (NULLIF (@MinPrice, 0) IS NULL) AND (NULLIF (@MaxPrice, 0) IS NULL) AND (TypeID = @TypeID) AND (LocationID = @LocationID) OR
12 (NULLIF (@MinPrice, 0) IS NULL) AND (NULLIF (@TypeID, 0) IS NULL) AND (NULLIF (@LocationID, 0) IS NULL) AND (Price <= @MaxPrice) OR
13 (NULLIF (@MinPrice, 0) IS NULL) AND (NULLIF (@TypeID, 0) IS NULL) AND (LocationID = @LocationID) AND (Price <= @MaxPrice) OR
14 (NULLIF (@MinPrice, 0) IS NULL) AND (NULLIF (@LocationID, 0) IS NULL) AND (TypeID = @TypeID) AND (Price <= @MaxPrice) OR
15 (NULLIF (@MinPrice, 0) IS NULL) AND (TypeID = @TypeID) AND (LocationID = @LocationID) AND (Price <= @MaxPrice) OR
16 (NULLIF (@TypeID, 0) IS NULL) AND (NULLIF (@LocationID, 0) IS NULL) AND (Price >= @MinPrice) AND (Price <= @MaxPrice) OR
17 (NULLIF (@TypeID, 0) IS NULL) AND (LocationID = @LocationID) AND (Price >= @MinPrice) AND (Price <= @MaxPrice) OR
18 (NULLIF (@LocationID, 0) IS NULL) AND (TypeID = @TypeID) AND (Price >= @MinPrice) AND (Price <= @MaxPrice) OR
19 (TypeID = @TypeID) AND (LocationID = @LocationID) AND (Price >= @MinPrice) AND (Price <= @MaxPrice)
I have inherited a db with slowness claims. Last week at a MS seminar where independent SQL Consultant gave presentation on performance gotchas. One of his top 5, do not use coalesce on joins and where clause. Of course it is all over this db. Looking at below was this a bad approach?
WHEREcoalesce(PM.ALTKEYDOC,'x') = coalesce(@AK,PM.ALTKEYDOC,'x')
AND coalesce(PM.FIRSTNAME,'x') LIKE coalesce('%' + @FN + '%',PM.FIRSTNAME,'x')
AND coalesce(PM.LASTNAME,'x') LIKE coalesce('%' + @LN + '%',PM.LASTNAME,'x')
AND coalesce(PM.SEX,'x') = coalesce(@SX,PM.SEX,'x')
AND coalesce(PM.BIRTHDATE,'1/1/1900') = coalesce(@BD,PM.BIRTHDATE,'1/1/1900')
AND coalesce(PM.DIVISION,'x') = coalesce(@DI,PM.DIVISION,'x')
AND PM.STATE = @STATE
ORDER BY LASTNAME