SQL 2012 :: High Availability Groups Service Restart
Jun 9, 2015
I inherited a SQL 2012 Ent server sitting on a 2008R2 server using AlwaysOn High Availability, two nodes.
Available Mode: Synchronous commit
Failover Mode: Manual
Connection in Primary role: Allow all connections
Readable secondary: No
seesion timeout: 10
Somebody decided to give SQL server priority boost so I need to change this ASAP. So I plan on doing the following.
1. Manually fail over to the secondary, which does not have the priority boost set to true
2. change the setting
3. restart the service
4. Manually fail over
My question is with the service restart. How does SQL handle if the DB changes on the new primary while the secondary is having the service restarted. Where can I see if the DB are sync again or if not where are they in the sync process.
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Mar 9, 2015
We have H/A setup on SQL2012. Seems to work fine.I thought there was code I could add that would check to see if it was running on the primary node?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 30, 2014
I been trying to learn availability groups since I have not implemented it.
From my understanding you can have more than one group.
Lets pretend we have two groups in one instance:
1. Accounting
2. Engineering
From my understanding you can't make a database in two AG because it wouldn't make sense.
But lets pretending there is one database that both are used by accounting and engineering.
Would you have to make a third AG for future fail overs so that other databases in the other two group don't failover when not needed because when you fail over an AG all the databases inside it fail over.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2014
So we have our HA group servers and databases, now we want to deploy schema changes to the HA group databases.
1.) Can we deploy the changes to Server2.mydatabase whilst still having Server1.mydatabase available to users?
2.) If yes, what is involved in doing so
3.) If no, What is the best suggestions to apply schema changes to HA databases.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 13, 2014
I am using SQL Server 2012 and my AlwaysOn High Availability features is not enabled? What should I do. Is this requires any extra system requirements to be installed?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 3, 2015
I have a Customer running a database in a High Availability Group and I am not familiar with the set up... They have a transaction log that quadrupled in size during a data import and update which was generated by an external application. They have limited server space and would like to shrink the log again now as this import / update only happens once a year. The way this has always been dealt with in the past was by shrinking the DB and logs after the update.
Now however, when attempting to do a log or db shrink, an error message is generated which says that the log cannot be shrunk as the DB is in use as part of an Availability Group....
The more I search and try to read up on this subject, it looks like the DB has to be removed from the Availability Group before the log can be shrunk and then the Availability Group has to be re-created or restored in some way. Is there a simple solution to this conundrum?
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 19, 2015
Discovered that a geo-spatial AlwaysOn HA database (1 of 4) was not synchronizing as at a point in time earlier in the day. Â Suspend Data Movement appears to be working perpetually without finishing. Â The SQL Server services is in a Pending Changes state after an attempt to restart it from SQL Configuration Manager. Â The Cluster Dashboard says it is in a Not Synchronizing state, with only the one database in question having a yellow triangle, all 3 others show green. Â
The warning for the cluster is:At least one availability database on this availability replica has an unhealthy data synchronization state. If this is an asynchronous-commit availability replica, all availability databases should be in the SYNCHRONIZING state. If this is a synchronous-commit availability replica, all availability databases should be in the SYNCHRONIZED state. Â There is no abnormal data movement from the primary to the seconday.The warnings for the unhealthy database are:
The data synchronization state of this availability database is unhealthy. On an asynchronous-commit availability replica, every availability database should be in the SYNCHRONIZING state. On a synchronous-commit replica, every availability database should be in the SYNCHRONIZED state.Either a database administrator or the system has suspended data synchronization on this availability database.So how to get this database back to synchronizing state?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 12, 2013
From what I understand, one SQL Server 2012 instance can host multiple availability groups. That should allow, for example, the following situation - one SQL Server 2012 instance containing three primary replica databases - each one part of a different availability group - and each availability group's secondary replica located on a separate SQL Server 2012 instance.
Can you have three SQL Server 2012 instances, each with one primary replica database and have all three secondary replica databases on one SQL Server 2012 instance? So instead of, as above, going from 1 primary server to 3 secondary servers, this time we're going from 3 primary servers to 1 secondary server? The one secondary server would then contain all three secondary replicas for each of the 3 separate primary replicas.
This would mean that the single server (where all three secondary replicas reside) was part of three separate Windows Server Failover Clustering clusters.
Is this scenario possible?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2014
I have four instances and each instance have its own Availability Group with its own listener.
Would like to know if you can have one listener for multiple Availability groups?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 28, 2014
We had 3 Availability Groups set up in SQL 2012 last year but they were poorly named so I am just looking to rename them but there doesn't seem to be any command for it that I can find.Can they not be renamed once created? I guess I could just create new ones and move the DB's into them but just thought I would check!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 14, 2014
I have several 2012 availability groups running on a cluster. I have one database that is bulk loaded every 30 minutes. The DB is about 1 GB in size. To be on the availability group it has to be set to full recovery mode, but simple or even bulk would obviously be better. Is there a better way to handle the transaction log size other than to run a backup after each bulk load causing extra overhead? With mirrors you could use simple, but since those are going away . . .
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 15, 2014
I would like synchronizing all the missing objects (logins, agent jobs, SSIS, and anything else that I've missed) across SQL 2012 Availability Groups.
I would like to be able to able to automate this process....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 8, 2015
We have some tables that are bulk-loaded every day and they do not have RI to the other tables in the database.
To ease pressure on the logs, I had the idea of spinning them off to another database on the same AG in simple or bulk-load recovery model and using synonyms to point to them so the code base would not need changing.
I know an earlier bug in 2005 existed that basically made the query analyzer ignore indexes if a table was accessed via a synonym.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Sep 15, 2015
We have multiple SQL 2012 SQL servers setup in an alwaysOn availability groups. Where should we schedule the re-index? We have Server1 as the primary and 2 secondaries Server2 and Server3. Are their any tricks to have it run on which ever one is the primary?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 28, 2014
I came across an issue while migrating from SQL 2005 to SQL 2012 and using AlwaysOn Group. For some strange reason, when ever i connect to the Listener name for each AlwaysOn group, it list all the databases which is on the SQL instance, so i would be able to see databases that is not part of that Availability Group. I am not using default port, so have to put the port after the Name to connect and both Instance and Listener are using different port.
Testing the fail over works fine too, when i perform a manual failover, i can connect to any of the databases in the group from my application with no problem.
Considering that the Listener Port is different to the port which the instance is using?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jul 9, 2014
We have a vendor that is exposing our database via a High Availability replica. They are geographically far away from us though so we would like to extract portions of the database over to our side for our reporting /warehousing purposes. I was curious if it is possible to setup snapshot replication on a high availability group?
View 0 Replies
View Related
Dec 16, 2014
I have a HA Listener which is visible and can be connected to, it has a read only secondary on a different subnet so when connecting to it we use the applicationintent = readonly and multisubnetfailover = true.
Trying to connect it as a linked server is giving me problems. I tried putting the extra info into the provider string but keep getting the failure to initialise error. I am trying to link SQL2012 to a 2012 HA group but will also need to connect from a sql2008 server as well
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 21, 2014
I'm reading up on Always on and I am confused what is the difference between AlwaysOn Availability Groups and AlwaysOn Failover Cluster Instances.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 22, 2014
Approach 1:
Prod - shared storage between server 1 and 2
Server1: clustered SQL instance with availability group as primary
Server2: Passive server for clustered instance of PROD
DR - shared storage between server 1 and 2
Server1: Clustered SQL instance with availability group as replica
Server2: Passive server for clustered instance of DR
Approach 2: Using replicated SAN
Prod -
Server 1: Standalone instance with availability group as Primary
Server 2:Standalone instance with availability group as replica
DR -
Server 1: Offline until Disk group 1 (Prod server 1) has been broken and brought online at DR
Server 2: Offline until Disk group 2 (Prod server 2) has been broken and brought online at DR
Both these approaches will work wont they? I have only built and played with normal availability groups across servers, not mixing it with clustered instance replicated SAN
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 23, 2007
Hi,
Is there a way to configure mirroring to go from High Availability to High Protection without having to reconfigure Database Mirroring? Using the interface in Management Studio, I can change the configuration option to High Performance, but not High Protection despite both of them being Synchronous.
If not, what are the recommended steps to configure the mirror once it already has been configured? Is just like initially setting up the mirror or would there be any shortcuts I could take? If I stop the mirroring and remove the witness, will the High Protection option be available?
Thanks,
J.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 10, 2015
When I re-boot the machine, if the sql server is set to "automatic", will the service re-start when re-booting the machine?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 22, 2015
I need to be able to restart an application service after the SQL Cluster fails over. how to accomplish this as a SQL job?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 2, 2004
Hello everybody,
We are starting new project
Customer validation with minimum wait time.
How to insure High-Availability?
We have 2 standard servers and in past used custom log shipping.
Log shipping still requre manual intervention ,while goal to switch
between servers automaticly.
Clustering is a last possible solution.
Could someone recomend any other soluion or products?
Thank you
Alex
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 19, 2003
Hi,
I am new in SQL SERVER.I wanted to setup high availability database.It would be great if any one could answers my questions please.
-What are the options availability for HA except clustering?
-How to set up log shipping HA ?
-How to monitor log shipping?
-Is standby DB and log shipping same ?
-Can I setup log shipping without backup/restore method.Like I have to create db1 on server A and create db1 on server B and then configure log shipping?
-Is it necessary to ship log for master database or only user Database?
Thx
-Blace
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 27, 2013
I have to describe Microsoft SQL High Availability options in the following layers: infrastructure, middleware and application. I know there are following options available: failover clustering, replication, mirroring and AlwaysOn but I am not sure in which layer each of them are.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 17, 2004
I have implemented log shipping between 2 databases, the transaction log size normally between 10mb - 50mb every 15 minutes during normal working hours, but it grows to 9GB when we run database optimization job and that makes it hard and long to transfer and apply the transaction log on the other database. Does anybody encountered a situation like this and is there a way to minimize the size of the Trans log after the optimization job?
Thanx
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 12, 2006
We have a multi-lingual website (English, Spanish and German). We have a table called Posts that is potentially getting really big.
We are in the initial design phase of the database and would like to know what the experts are suggesting to keep our database mean and lean in the long run.
We have been talking about splitting the database up into 3 separate databases, one for English, one for Spanish and one for German. The language specific databases would also be hosted in countries where the language is spoken eg. the German database would be hosted in Germany.
Or maybe database partitioning by language???
Making changes to 3 databases once launched seems like a nightmare. It would be nice to have one main database and maybe 2 (Spanish and German) €œsatellite€? databases or something like that €“ any ideas???.
Any suggestions of how to deal with this problem the best way would be greatly appreciated. We are using SQL Server 2005.
Newbie!
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 18, 2004
Hello,
Does any one know, any software out there that can provide a solid failover / cluster / high availability solution for SQL Server 2000 Databases.
I have tried Incepto but it requires an extra column in every single table that involves in Replication and its not gonna work
So Please advise.
Thanks,
imransi.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 26, 2004
I've been asked to look into the possibility of using SQL Server in a high availability environment. We have a few web based applications that use SQL Server back end DBs. What we are looking into is whether we can use multiple instances (on multiple physical servers) of SQL Server using some type of clustering/load balancing. I haven't worked with SQL Replication before, so I'm not even sure where to start in exploring the possible avenues we can explore.
Can anyone push me in the right direction? Any info would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks,
Bill
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 15, 2008
The company that I work for has multiple database instances across two data centres in two different cities. All of these databases have front end applications reading/writing data to them.
Now, we have taken an initiative to merge all databases into one consolidated database. Then we want this database to be available in the other data centre. We'll have front application running at both locations reading/writing data to the databases and want it to be written to the other database too. These systems are in production 24/7 and we cannot afford any downtime over 5 minutes.
Replication, Log shipping, Mirroring or combination?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 11, 2008
Here is the situation we are trying to resolve. The client has 2 locations, each has local appliations running on a database. db schema on both locations are the same, data is different and won't overlap.
The requirements are:
1. at each location the application can read and write
2. near zero down time for applications on each site
3. db on one site also has the data from the other site for DR purpose
The client is running on SQL 2005 STD SP2
We looked at the approach of setting up db mirroring on each location + 2-way transactional replication between both locations. The mirroring was fine, and I was able to set up transactional replication from mirrored publisher to a non-mirrored subscriber. But, from what I experienced and from reading, there is no way to have the subscriber db to be mirrored, since Distribution Agents simply doesn't have the option to specify Failover Partnr for mirroring, so I guess it is not supported. Any comments on that?
Assuming that's correct, then the only way of using SQL out-of-box technique seems to be using Clustering on each location instead of mirroring, then the 2-way transactional replication works on clustered subscribers I think (although I haven't tested it). Peer-2-Peer replication would have been a good candidate between sites in this case, but STD version of sql 2005 ruled that out.
Any suggestions and comments are welcome.
Thanks
View 7 Replies
View Related
Aug 24, 2007
I need to make a brief presentation to upper management about High Availability options in SQL Server 2005.
Current choices being considered are:
- Failover clustering
- Log shipping
- Mirroring
Q1: Are there other choices?
Q2: How do these choices compare in terms of cost, complexity of setup, ease of deployment, recovery procedures in case of a disaster?
Ben Aminnia
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 5, 2008
Hi
I would like to know, Is Logshipping is supported on SQL 2005 clustering?
Thanks in Advanceshan
View 4 Replies
View Related
