SQL 2012 :: Make Subscriber To Read-only?
Jul 17, 2015is there a way the data gets updated is through the replication only to subscriber ?
other users should only read the data , they shouldn't do any update at subscriber end.
is there a way the data gets updated is through the replication only to subscriber ?
other users should only read the data , they shouldn't do any update at subscriber end.
Any help at this stage is welcome!
Due to collation-discrepancies the publisher and subscriber databases have been recreated.
When however I attempt to restart the publishing...SQL gives the message
"The process could not make a generation at the 'Subscriber"
There is enough space on the harddisk of either subscriber or publisher 3Gbyte+
UserRights are ok and I reinitialized the publication.
Everything seems ok and yet I get the error mentionned above.
Can anyone give me some help with this?
Thank you!! :)
VincentJS
Using SQL CE 3.1 merge replication. Working fine, but want to make subscription read only. In other words, master/slave pattern.
How is this accomplished?
How to identify whether the files are in read write or read only?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi,
I'm using SQL Server 7.0. I have a requirement to make all stored procedures Read Only in Enterprise Manager except for the DBA. In other words, any sp in Production can be viewed by anyone in Enterprise Manager, but can only be overwritten or changed by the DBA.
Does anyone know if this is possible and, if so, how do I set it up?
Thanks in advance,
Darrin
Hi.
I have a table where I need to set some rows to Read only (to protect the rows from being edited). Can I do this with a trigger checking against a column (where dataReadOnly = 1)?
Or is there a better way?
thankyou
i have a database which get refreshed every day from client's data . and we need to pull heavy data from them every day as reports . so only selects happens on that database.
we do daily population of some table in some other databases from this daily refreshed DB.
will read uncommitted or NOLOCK with select queries to retrieve data faster.
there will be no dirty read as there are NO DML operation in that database so for SELECT which happens concurrently on these tables , will NOLOCK work?
Can a user of db owner role of a database change the databse option to read only and read-write?If not what permission I need to grant to the user?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI’ve been trying for a while now (won’t say how long), to get BIDS to read a very simple Excel file.
I’m talking SIMPLE!! No matter what I don, SSIS keeps throwing an error, and of course it doesn’t say what the error is, so I can’t really debug it.
I’ve tried this at least 20x with flat files, and it works perfect each time. I’ve done Data Conversions, Sorting, Union All, and several other Transformations; all work perfect.
Trying to used Excel as a data source, is proving to be a mind numbing experience. Of over 20 different attempts, it hasn’t worked even once. I can make it as simple as you can possibly imagine, and SSIS, refuses to even perform the first step (I’m not even trying to create a table in SQL Server anymore).
I have the Excel file path (very simple)
I have the Excel version (very simple)
I have the Connection Manager (very simple)
I have the Sheet name (very simple)
All I can do is see a preview of the Excel sheet before the process runs. As soon as I het F5, I get an instant error, for no reason whatsoever, and no debugging options,whatsoever.
I have transactional replication setup from server A to Server B. I wanted to move the subscriber from B to C. What could be the best approach.
1. Backup the DB from Server B and restore on Server C. set the replication between A & C.
2. setup the transaction replication between A & C along between A & B. Test A& C working fine and then remove B.
If I am going with approach 2 , I have to replicate data approx. 70 GB so If I ran both the replication on Server A that will stress as 140 GB of data moving out. How do I control this large movement ? Can the replication be manual synch?
I do not understand why I have this issue.
SQL 2012 SP2, Transactional Replication.
I have added a new table to a database (existing publication) using T-SQL, I then opened up publisher properties, and ticked the new table/article so that it would be added to the subscriber. It did not show up.
I did not use a snapshot to initialize the subscription.
Immediate Synch is 0.
allow_anonymous is 0.
I mark the subscription to be reinitialized. When I start the snapshot agent I get '0% A snapshot was not generated because no subscriptions needed initialization'.
What could I be doing wrong, or missed out? Do I need to drop and recreate the subscription to get the article to show up?
I'm in the process of migrating over nearly 900 reports to a replicated server.
I have moved over 100 reports, stored procedures and their dependent objects so far.
I have two tables that are not being applied to the subscriber.
I have a setup of transaction replication between one publisher and subscriber in the Same server.Now, I need to add a new subscriber to the existing publisher. So publisher database name is DB_A and Subscriber 1 name is DB_B. So the new subscriber will be DB_C. Is this kind of setup possible on one server?
If yes then at the time of reinitialization is it going to apply the snapshot on DB_B as well as DB_C?Also let say if due to disk error DB_B gets corrupted then will data be still replicated between DB_A and DB_C? (Assuming publisher, subscriber 1 and 2 are sitting on individual disks).
We have a database which is (a subset of tables are) replicated to another via transactional replication. Whilst most changes made at the published database reach the subscriber within a matter of seconds, we have a SQL Agent job which performs a calculation in the published database and then immediately exports data from the subscriber using log shipping. The result is that the calculated changes do not make it through to the exported transaction logs in time.
Is there a way to manually "refresh" the subscriber databases using T-SQL?
I have setup Transnational replication with updatable subscription.
There were around 7000 rows update at subscriber from one query which was executed at subscriber side.
But this update has not taken place at publisher yet and so to other subscribers.
Is there any way i can monitor pending log or where is the issue?
I find so many ways to see pending logs or statistics for - "Publisher to Subscriber" but not for "subscriber to publisher"
What is the way to see subscriber to publisher pending and issues?
I have a transactional replication environment that creates subscribers on another server as a staging area for an ETL process to a data warehouse application on a 3rd server which is the report repository. Currently the ETL process runs every 10 minutes and performs it's function across approx 150+ subscriber databases and consolidates it to the data warehouse.
I have an SLA of 2 minutes. I'd like to rework the ETL process (which run as SSIS job at the moment) to be specific to a single database and fire that one ETL proces when changes have been applied to that subscriber database only. Of these 150+ databases generally only about 8-10 are updating the subscriber at any given time per Repl Monitor. I'm thinking that if I only have a few transactions to apply to a single db the ETL would run in seconds dynamically as the subscriber is update.
The issue is how to fire the ETL process upon completion of updates to the subscriber DB? I'm thinking of using SP_Start_job passing the DBID to update the warehouse but unsure whether this is possible but if so where to trigger it.
I have 2 different types of data for the same key. My queries renders these results into 2 rows. I'd like them to be one row.
Example
DOG Name_a Color_a Age_a Name_B Color_B Age_B
Boxer BO Fawn 1
Boxer Maggie Brindle 4
Lab Jackson Yellow 2
Lab Sandie Black 3
The result I want
DOG Name_a Color_a Age_a Name_B Color_B Age_B
Boxer BO Fawn 1 Maggie Brindle 4
Lab Jackson Yellow 2 Sandie Black 3
Can we make SQL 2012 Always ON over the normal SQL Cluster 2012.
View 3 Replies View RelatedCurrently I am running a SSIS package scheduled daily at 7 A.M. It expects two feed files from two different folders. The first step in my package will rename the input files in those folders to names which the package can understand. I have created two variables in my package to read the files with those file names. I used these variables in connection managers.
If any of these folders doesn't have input files when the package runs, the package will fail.how to make the package the run successfully even there is no input feed?
I am wondering if I can show the Excel window when the SQL server agent job runs. The SSIS package contains a script task that opens Excel and does some formatting. I just need to monitor the formatting of these Excel files.
View 2 Replies View RelatedLogic:ensure the Docket number is 5 digits and populate with leading zeros if not.I have to check input number field is 5 digits, if not I have to populate with leading zeros to make it as 5 digits.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI created a query that got the following result. But I expect to get the structure like, care_nbr, cust_nbr,legal_name, address_type=physical address, addr_line_1, addr_line_2, address_type-primary address, ddr_line_1, addr_line_2. That means I only need primary and physical address, and expect them to show in a row to each care_nbr. How to perform that?
CARE_Nbr||Cust_Nbr||Legal_Name||||||| Address_Tpye |||Addr_Line_1 ||||||||||||||||Addr_Line_2
99000001||004554||Mac Marketing, LLC||Billing Address||210 Parktowne Blvd Ste. 1||NULL
99000001||004554||Mac Marketing, LLC||Mailing Address||210 Parktowne Blvd Ste. 1||NULL
99000001||004554||Mac Marketing, LLC||Primary Address||210 Parktowne Blvd Ste. 1||NULL
99000001||004554||Mac Marketing, LLC||Physical Address||210 Parktowne Blvd Suite 1||NULL
My script is here, and the sample result is attached. How should I modify this query to get my expected result?
select a.CARE_Number,
a.Customer_Nbr_Txt,
a.Customer_Type_Txt,
a.Legal_Name_Txt,
c.Address_Type_Txt,c.Address_Line_1_Txt,c.Address_Line_2_Txt,
a.Customer_Status_Txt,
a.Legal_Entity_Type_Txt,
a.Business_Unit_Txt
FROM dw_mart.dbo.DimCustomer a
[code]....
I have an availability group with read only replicas, readable secondary set to yes and allow all incoming connections. I have also configured the read only routing (at least I'm pretty sure this is correct).
If I login to SSMS with a user in the sysadmin role I can view the objects in the read only replica database. If I login with a user in the public role I'm unable to get past the obvious error:
"The database databaseA is not accessbile. (ObjectExplorer)"
I've also tried adding the "ApplicationIntent=ReadOnly" option.
We are using 208r2. We used to generate simple reports against to prod. The production is running slow. Just we need the production fresh copy all the time. We are using mainly one database. So I need to have read only copy of that particular database which is sync with the production.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have an inter-company problem.
The one company gathers data into a SQL database hosted within their secure network and now one of the companies (that they are contracted to gather the data for) wants a backup of the data or a replicated database to be able to be placed onto a external HDD or different SQL server on their own network and server.
The catch is that to maintain their data security the original company doesn't want the company that is receiving the data to be able to edit the data. They are concerned that someone might change the data and claim that the data that they gathered is incorrect.
Is there a way to ensure the SQL database remains entirely read only?
Unable to access the 'T' database because no online secondary replicas are enabled for read-only access. Check the availability group configuration to verify that at least one secondary replica is configured for read-only access. Wait for an enabled replica to come online, and retry your read-only operation. Changed database context to 'T'.
I have 2 sql servers running in an AG group. SQL 2 is fully syncd and is used for read only reporting.The connection from the listener using ReadOnly works and connects to SQL 2. The problem is, when a database in SQL 2 is suspended from the AG group, the listener does not connect to the SQL 1 (primary).
The AG group is setup exactly like this:
Readable Secondary = Yes for both SQL 1 and 2, Availability Mode = Synchronous
why the listener does not connect to primary server?Connection in primary was set to "Allow read/write connections" for the AG. This meant "Connections where the Application Intent connection property is set to ReadOnly are not allowed. " Setting to "Allow All Connections" worked.
we would like something like Mirroring with a Snapshot database so that the "replicated" site can read the database locally.Unfortunately, this requires SQL Enterprise edition on the reading site if I get this right.Is there a cheaper way to achieve this sort of functionality?
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have created a Transactional Replication Publication on my SQL 2012 server.When I log into another server on the domain running 2008R2 and try to subscribe to the 2012 Publication, I get the following error when clicking on "Add SQL Server Subscriber": "The selected Subscriber does not satisfy the minimum version compatibility level of the selected publication"
The 2012 DB is set as 2008 Compatibility Mode?Am I not able to Publish from 2012 to 2008?.I was using SSMS 2008 to connect to my 2012 Instance, thats why it didn't work...
In my ETL job I would like to truncate stg table but before truncating stging table, I want to make sure that all the records are inserted in the data model. The sample is as below
create table #stg (
CreateID int,
Name nvarchar(10)
)
insert into #stg
select 1, 'a' union all
select 2, 'b' union all
[Code] ....
How can I check among these tables and make sure that all values are loaded into the data model and the staging table can be truncated.
I have the following code and trouble reading values of Bank Accounts. If i remove the line it says "xmlns="http://applications.apch1.com/webservice/schema/" then i my query is working. But i cant remove this becasue that is what i will get response from a web service. All the records are stored in the database with this line included.
DECLARE @MyXML XML
SET @MyXML = '<GetEmployeeDetails xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<return xmlns="http://applications.apch1.com/webservice/schema/">
<CustomerID> A8339 </CustomerID>
<BankAccounts>
[Code] .....
We have poor performance spikes on a drive containing our log file but this is only for reads and seems to be at a time when we run a re-index job. If this is a likely correlation as to poor performance in reading the log file, and what reads are done from a log file.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have an issue when connecting with application Intent=readonly when using Listener name. I can connect to the read only secondary with application Intent=readonly if I use the server name. It gives a host does not exist error when using listener. This happens only if I am using the application Intent keyword. I can connect for normal readwrite operation using listener name.
View 3 Replies View RelatedConsidering trying to move 2008 acitve/passive cluster with log ship to day old read only 2008 server to 2012 active/passive to 2012 AG Read only server. Only problem is that read only instance may have to be a 2nd instance on a server. The new box is a beast 64 core 256 gig of RAM hp so this is no dog. So I have these choices
migrate 2008 active/passive cluster to 2012 active passive (this will be it's own ordeal)take new monster box and build two instances, one that will run the AG read only database, the other will house reporitng services and analysis services and a few dw databases. We are not heavy into deep dive analysis services yet kind of in it's infancy. Not sure if this other instance will be sql 2008R2 , may be able to do 2012. MY also have a few small sharepoint databases but they barely use it.