SQL 2012 :: Manually Refreshing Subscriber Database In Transactional Replication

Dec 22, 2014

We have a database which is (a subset of tables are) replicated to another via transactional replication. Whilst most changes made at the published database reach the subscriber within a matter of seconds, we have a SQL Agent job which performs a calculation in the published database and then immediately exports data from the subscriber using log shipping. The result is that the calculated changes do not make it through to the exported transaction logs in time.

Is there a way to manually "refresh" the subscriber databases using T-SQL?

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

SQL 2012 :: Transactional Replication - Fire A Job / Sproc After Applying Records To Subscriber

Feb 28, 2014

I have a transactional replication environment that creates subscribers on another server as a staging area for an ETL process to a data warehouse application on a 3rd server which is the report repository. Currently the ETL process runs every 10 minutes and performs it's function across approx 150+ subscriber databases and consolidates it to the data warehouse.

I have an SLA of 2 minutes. I'd like to rework the ETL process (which run as SSIS job at the moment) to be specific to a single database and fire that one ETL proces when changes have been applied to that subscriber database only. Of these 150+ databases generally only about 8-10 are updating the subscriber at any given time per Repl Monitor. I'm thinking that if I only have a few transactions to apply to a single db the ETL would run in seconds dynamically as the subscriber is update.

The issue is how to fire the ETL process upon completion of updates to the subscriber DB? I'm thinking of using SP_Start_job passing the DBID to update the warehouse but unsure whether this is possible but if so where to trigger it.

View 1 Replies View Related

Bi Directional Transactional Replication And Subscriber Name

Oct 19, 2004

Hi,
I am trying to setup bi-directional transactional replication between 2 SQL Servers,
I add the subscription on both the servers using the code below.

EXEC sp_addsubscription @publication = N'test',
@article = N'all', @subscriber = 'AnyServer',
@destination_db = N'test', @sync_type = N'none',
@status = N'active', @update_mode = N'read only',
@loopback_detection = 'true'
GO

I have defined 'AnyServer' on both the servers using cliconfg
(Server1's AnyServer pointed towards Server2 and Server2's AnyServer pointed towards Server1, I need to do that because there is a restriction to run the same code on both the servers),

After inserting a record on server1 in the 'test' database, the changes successfully transfers to the server2, then server2 sends it back to server1 and server1 generates the error of

"Violation of PRIMARY KEY constraint 'PK_Table1'. Cannot insert duplicate key in object 'Table1'."

It seems as if loop detection is failing if I keep the same subscriber name on both sides.

It runs fine when I change the subscriber name in the subscription (@subscriber = 'Server2' for server1 and @subscriber = 'Server1' for server2).

Can anybody explains this behavior to me?

View 2 Replies View Related

Mirrored Subscriber In Transactional Replication ?

Apr 30, 2008

Hi,

I am trying to setup mirrored subcriber in Transactional Replication in SQL 2005. I am not able to do so as it don't work after failover.However I am able to setup mirrored publisher with distribution property "PublisherFailoverPartner" for snapshot and log reader agent profiles and it works even after failover.

However I need to know, do we have something called "Subscriberfailoverproperty" or any other method to set up mirrored subscriber in Transactional Replication in SQL 2005.


Thanks

Kiran Patil

View 6 Replies View Related

Replication: Transactional: Multi Publications, One Subscriber.

Jul 20, 2005

Greetings All, I was hoping that a replication sage might be able toanswer a question for me.I want to have one subscriber subscribing to N publishers. Iessentially have a company that has a main headquarters and threesatellite offices. I want each of the satellite offices to push theirdata up to the master database. From what I have read it seems likethis should not be a problem. Some questions that come to mind are:1.)Does the master need to be read only or can it be configured to beupdateable as well?2.)Can the distribution agent on all the publishers be set tocontinuously distribute or should it be staggered so as not to cause aproblem when another distribution agent is running?3.)If the distribution is set to "delay distribution" will this causechanges on the subscriber to be pushed out to the publishers?In this database guid's are used as pk's so the issue of pk collisionsis not a problem.I hope that this question is not too vague. My experience thus farwith replication has been simple one way transactional and simplemerge replication.Regards, Louis Frolio

View 3 Replies View Related

Transactional Replication: Commands Are Not Applying To Subscriber

Oct 30, 2006

Hi!

The distributor was down for a long time (neer the week) and after that the commands stop applying to subscriber, while they successfully collected from publisher and stored into distributor.

Replication agent on distributor reports that initial snapshot is not available. It seems subscription is expired. But all commands from the point distributor down I have. How can I make distr agent to resume activity without reinitialize snapshot?

View 3 Replies View Related

How To Reflect Schema Changes At Subscriber Using Transactional Replication

May 16, 2007

Hi

I need to setup transactional replication for a production server.

The tables (articles) at publisher being replicated can expect schema changes.



Is there any way to reflect schema changes at subscriber using transactional replication.



Early Thanks,

Salman Shehbaz.

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server Admin 2014 :: Transactional Replication And CDC On Subscriber

Jun 15, 2015

Any experience of success or failure setting up CDC on the subscriber end of transactional replication?

Also for a bonus answer, why are explicit index operations not permitted (I'm assuming this is even on the publisher?) From BOL:

• Explicitly adding, dropping, or altering indexes is not supported. Indexes created implicitly for constraints (such as a primary key constraint) are supported.

View 0 Replies View Related

Transactional Replication - Re-syncing Publisher From Subscriber After Failure

Jul 23, 2005

I have taken over a transactional replication setup that is being usedfor fault tolerance (I know, I know...).The scenario I am concerned with is where the publisher goes down due tofailure, so we need to point our application at the subscriber and startupdating the data there. We are not using the immediate updating option.How do I go about re-syncing the publisher with the data that been addedto, or changed on the subscriber, when the publisher comes back online?Thanks,TGru*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!

View 1 Replies View Related

Creating Triggers In Transactional Replication On The Subscriber Side

Jun 17, 2007

Hi all

i have setup default transactional replication using locat distributor scheme. I need to create triggers on tables at subscriber side. Can this be done using transaction replication?



Thanks,

Arslan.

View 2 Replies View Related

Problem Pushing Subscriber Updates To Publisher In Transactional Replication

Apr 15, 2004

I have a primary and secondary servers both running Windows 2000 SP3 with SQL 2000 SP3. I have set up transactional replication with the primary server as publisher and the secondary server has the distributor and subscriber DB. I am testing the scenerio where my primary server goes down and I have to make updates to the secondary server until my primary server comes back up. I am able to update my subscriber database and the transactions go into the MSreplication_queue table to be pushed back to the primary when it comes back up. When I bring the primary server back up and start the queue agent job it starts pushing the transactions over and then stops after 4 or 5 transactions with the error "Failed while applying queued message to publisher". I have attached part of the log file for the agent below


dbserver2.Old_Processing: {? = call dbo.sp_getsqlqueueversion (?, ?, ?, ?)}
dbserver2.Old_Processing: {? = call dbo.sp_replsqlqgetrows (N'DBSERVER', N'Old_Processing', N'Old_Processing')}
[4/15/2004 3:59:47 PM]dbserver2.distribution: exec dbo.sp_helpdistpublisher @publisher = N'DBSERVER'
Connecting to DBSERVER 'DBSERVER.Old_Processing'
DBSERVER.Old_Processing: {? = call dbo.sp_getqueuedarticlesynctraninfo (N'Old_Processing', 21)}
SQL Command : <exec [dbo].[sp_MSsync_ins_IQ2KProcSystem_1] N'dbserver2', N'Old_Processing', '072175', '2004-03-19 00:00:00.000', 1>
DBSERVER.Old_Processing: {? = call dbo.sp_getqueuedarticlesynctraninfo (N'Old_Processing', 15)}
SQL Command : <exec [dbo].[sp_MSsync_ins_NightlyProcess_1] N'dbserver2', N'Old_Processing', '072175', '2004-03-19 00:00:00.000', '2004-04-15 15:56:44.623000000', 'Begin ProcessIQ2KSystem', 'AB14E5D7-C81D-4A39-A8F5-51F1C48227B0', '17E5D98F-EDF0-41D0-9991-97511B850720', 1>
SQL Command : <exec [dbo].[sp_MSsync_upd_IQ2KProcSystem_1] N'dbserver2', N'Old_Processing', '072175', '2004-03-19 00:00:00.000', 1>
DBSERVER.Old_Processing: {? = call dbo.sp_getqueuedarticlesynctraninfo (N'Old_Processing', 7)}
SQL Command : <exec [dbo].[sp_MSsync_upd_TheatreProcess_1] N'dbserver2', N'Old_Processing', '072175', 1, '2004-03-19 00:00:00.000', 1, NULL, '79A114D6-FF31-4E37-AC2D-90C0A0114F40', '072175', 1, '2004-03-19 00:00:00.000', 0, NULL, 'AF61A098-44A3-45D7-B25B-E8EA9CD464A1', 0x2800, 1>
Failed while applying queued message to publisher
Disconnecting from DBSERVER 'DBSERVER'
Worker Thread 692 : Task Failed
Disconnecting from dbserver2 'dbserver2'
Processed 3 queued trans, 3 cmds, 0 conflicts
Queue Reader aborting

In the sql server logs I am getting this message:
Replication-Replication Transaction Queue Reader Subsystem: agent Repl Queue Reader failed. Failed while applying queued message to publisher.
Error: 14151, Severity: 18, State: 1

Any help would be greatly appreciated

View 4 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2008 :: Transactional Replication And Subscriber Log Growth Errors

Jun 14, 2015

I am getting the error The transaction log for database 'ReplicationDB' is full due to 'LOG_BACKUP'.log_reuse_wait_desc from sys.databases is showing logbackup

The database is subscribed database. We configured transactional replication. But the transactional replication is getting errors and failed. Is there relation b/n this replication failures and log growth in subscriber db?

View 3 Replies View Related

Transactional Replication From SQL 2000 Sp4 Publisher/distributor To SQL 2005 Sp2 Subscriber

Jun 26, 2007

Hello,



Are there any requirements that dictate the SQL Server version for the distribution agent for a SQL 2000 publisher with a transactional push subscription to a SQL 2005 subscriber?



Thanks in advance,



John

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: Configure Transactional Replication On AAG Or FCI

Dec 15, 2014

We are planning to setup HA using either AAG or FC. ON my production environment (P), I have transnational replication configured for 2 of databases out of three. These data get replicated to another server( C1) hosted on cloud, with local distributor at P.

If I configure AAG/ FCI , how do I handle failover?I wanted to setup P as primary AAG with two replicas as S1 and S2. P->S1 will be synchronous while P->S2 will be asynchronous.Incase my P goes down how the replication will failover S1? Incase P and S1 goes down how do I failover to S2 with the replication.

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: Setup Of Transaction Replication Between One Publisher And Subscriber In Same Server

Jul 30, 2014

I have a setup of transaction replication between one publisher and subscriber in the Same server.Now, I need to add a new subscriber to the existing publisher. So publisher database name is DB_A and Subscriber 1 name is DB_B. So the new subscriber will be DB_C. Is this kind of setup possible on one server?

If yes then at the time of reinitialization is it going to apply the snapshot on DB_B as well as DB_C?Also let say if due to disk error DB_B gets corrupted then will data be still replicated between DB_A and DB_C? (Assuming publisher, subscriber 1 and 2 are sitting on individual disks).

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: No More Transactional Replication With Updatable Subscriptions

May 24, 2012

So, Microsoft decided that they were deprecating Transactional Replication with Updatable subscriptions. In that case, you have 2 options (if I am correct): Pay for Enterprise (if you are already not) and use peer-to-peer or use bidirectional transactional replication which is basically setting up a transactional from db1 to db2 and also transactional from db2 to db1.

The issue I see in both cases is conflict resolution. With updatable subscriptions, you could specify how to handle the conflict. With either of these 2 options (from what I can tell) you cannot allow the engine to handle this for you.

Any thoughts? Seems like a slap in the face to those who have been using MS for years and a damn good reason for companies that rely on updatable subscriptions to not upgrade to 2012.

View 7 Replies View Related

Replication Issues After A Database Restore - Unable To Drop Or Create Transactional Replication

Sep 13, 2007

Hi,I have transactional replication set up on on of our MS SQL 2000 (SP4)Std Edition database serverBecause of an unfortunate scenario, I had to restore one of thepublication databases. I scripted the replication module and droppedthe publication first. Then did a full restore.When I try to set up the replication thru the script, it created thepublication with the following error messageServer: Msg 2714, Level 16, State 5, Procedure SYNC_FCR ToGPRPTS_GL00100, Line 1There is already an object named 'SYNC_FCR To GPRPTS_GL00100' in thedatabase.It seems the previous replication has set up these system viewsSYNC_FCR To GPRPTS_GL00100. And I have tried dropping the replicationmodule again to see if it drops the views but it didn't.The replication fails with some wired error & complains about thisviews when I try to run the synch..I even tried running the sp_removedbreplication to drop thereplication module, but the views do not seem to disappear.My question is how do I remove these system views or how do I make thereplication work without using these views or create new views.. Whyis this creating those system views in the first place?I would appreciate if anyone can help me fix this issue. Please feelfree to let me know if any additional information or scripts needed.Thanks in advance..Regards,Aravin Rajendra.

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: Script Failure During Snapshot For Transactional Replication

Apr 9, 2014

I built a number of publications on a SQL Server 2005 box to replicate to a SQL Server 2012 subscriber. All the publications except one are fine. During the snapshot phase of schema script generation I get Script Failed for Table 'dbo.MediaDisplayLibraryFileData'. From the Replication monitor for the Snapshot Agent on the Publication I get, "Column FileData in object MediaDisplayLibraryFileData contains type VarBinaryMax, which is not supported in the target server version, SQL Server 2000." This message makes no sense since the target server version is 2012. I have even checked that the compatibility level was set to 110 before I started the process of setting up replication. How do I resolve this error?

View 0 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: Transactional Replication - How To Remove Orphaned Articles

Jan 27, 2015

We are runnning on SQL Server 2012 SP1 + CU9.

I have found some articles with no publication in our transactional replication.

For example, running this:

select p.publication,
a.publication_id,
a.article
from dbo.MSArticles as a
left outer join dbo.MSpublications as p
on a.publication_id = p.publication_id

shows this:

NULL1org_Community
NULL3org_Community
Purchasing to EDW5org_Community
NULL1org_Division
NULL3org_Division
Purchasing to EDW5org_Division

How can I get rid of the articles that are not part of a publication?

I can't use sp_droparticle because it requires a publication which these articles do not have.

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: Transactional Replication Publisher Tables Renamed?

Apr 1, 2015

I am using SQL 2012 SE and implementing transactional replication. I need to insert the rows from publisher database tables to new tables, drop the old tables and rename the new tables with the old table names.

For example:

Publisher database tables that are being replicated:

Table1
Table2
Table3

and I am going to create new tables in publisher database

Table1_new
Table2_new
Table3_new

Move data from

Table1--->Table1_new
Table2--->Table2_new
Table3--->Table3_new

Drop constraints from and then tables (does this require articles to be removed from replication?)

Table1
Table2
Table3

Rename

Table1_new to Table1
Table2_new to Table2
Table3_new to Table3

Does this require replication to set up from scratch or add the three articles only to replication? Is there a way this can be done without pausing or reinitializing replication or without removing articles and adding them back?

View 0 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: Adding Articles To Existing Publication In Transactional Replication

Sep 26, 2014

I have an existing publication in sql 2012 with 2 articles, and then I add 2 more articles. After that when I generate a snapshot, will the snapshot be generated for 2 new articles only or for all 4 articles?

I remember adding 1 new articles to one existing publication with 150 articles and when I generated snapshot, it was generated only for 1 article. But I don't remember clearly.

Does it behave differently for small and large number of articles?

-----Table Proc Index Performance TSQL &&%$#@*(#@$%.......------------

View 0 Replies View Related

Replication Multiple Subscriber Database

Nov 28, 2007

I have a central server (CS1) with database CDB and a branch server (BR1)
Inside the branch server, there are two database DB1 and DB2.
CDB contains data for DB1 and DB2

I made a subscription in the brancserver named BR1:DB1(this will replicate the data from CDB to DB1)
I also made a subscription for DB2 named BR1:DB2(this will replicate the data from CDB to DB2)

Unfortunately, upon starting the synchronization for BR1:DB1, the data replicated into DB1 also contains data for DB2. same happens with the BR1:DB2..

How do I filter the data that will be replicate per database..Example:only data for DB1 coming from CDB should be replicated into DB1 if that specific subscription(BR1:DB1) is synchronized.

Thank you

View 1 Replies View Related

Replication :: Publish Database On Subscriber

Aug 13, 2015

I have database (DB) on the server SQL1. This database (DB) is published on SQL1 server for SQL2 server. So, SQL1 is publisher and SQL2 is subscriber for (DB). Can I publish database (DB) on the server SQL2 for the server SQL3? I would like to implement this scheme of Publication/Subscription:

<o:p></o:p>
SQL1 -> SQL2 ->SQL3..

I know, that it is simpler just to publish DB for SQL2 and SQL3 from SQL1, but, because of network connectivity, I can't do that...

View 3 Replies View Related

Replication :: Subscriber Database Having Missing Index

Jul 22, 2015

At my subscriber database I found some missing Indexes if I update all the missing Indexes on subscriber DB, does it impact at on publisher side?

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2008 :: Indexes On Subscriber Database With Replication?

Jul 15, 2015

When creating the snapshot I didn't choose the option copy non-clustered indexes. I created some indexes manually on subscriber database. Replication failed later with some issue.

so reinitialized with new snapshot but all the indexes are gone from the subscriber database.

How to keep the indexes without dropping from subscriber database whenever we reinitialized with snapshot

View 5 Replies View Related

Viewing Change To The Subscriber Database While Replication Is Running

Oct 18, 2007

I am doing replication through C#.net after creating the publication in server and subscription in client. But i want to know how can we view the transactions that are happening to the both databases through the C#.net code...If anybody knows please help me....

View 1 Replies View Related

Replication :: Drop One Of Larger Table Indices On Subscriber Database

Jul 31, 2015

We have a database we are replicating to about 8 SQL Express subscribers from a SQL 2012 SP2 publisher.  The size of the database grew too large for the 10GB license limit for SQL Express and now replication refuses to replicate any of our deletions on the publisher to reduce the size of the database.  I've come up with a few options below.

1) Drop one of the larger table indices on the subscriber database to get below the size restriction. Permit the replication to replicate the deleted records and then rebuild the index.  (I'm not sure how important an index is to this table.  Is it merely performance related?)

2) "Upsize" SQL Express to SQL Standard on the affected boxes.  Allow the deletes to replicate.  Backup the database, downgrade to SQL Express and restore the database back to SQL a new SQL express instance.  This would involve a lot of work on each box. I'd like to avoid it if possible.

View 2 Replies View Related

Trigger In The Subscription Database - Transactional Replication...

Feb 2, 2007

Hi,

We are Using Transactional Replication with Updatable Subscription in SQL Server 2005 SP1.

Subscription Type : Pull Subscription

Mode : Continuous Running Mode

Conflict Resolution Policy : Publisher Wins.

I have a table "Sample" (which is part of replication) and it has got 3 triggers. All the triggers are set NOT FOR REPLICATION.

The first trigger Updates a column of the "Sample" table in which i inserted a record.
The second trigger inserts record in to another database table and also updates a column of the table "Sample".
The third trigger does not affect any tables, it is written for some manipulations with variables.

In this scenario when I insert a record in the Sample table of the subscription database, that record is visible in the table. But during replication, it shows conflict in the Conflict Viewer and removes the record from the Sample table of the subscription database. The record is not replicated to the publisher and the other Subscriber also.

But when I comment any one update in either the first or second trigger, the insert works fine without any conflict.

Is there any issue with firing two triggers in replication which is updating the same table? I also suspect the Order of Commands moving to the Publisher from the MSReplication_Queue table, becoz the conflict viewer shows the subscriber as the Conflict loser.
Is there any issue with msrepl_tran_version, Since the conflict is decided based on this id??

It would be helpful if u could reply soon.



Thanks and Regards,

Swapna.B.

View 12 Replies View Related

Transactional Replication From SQL 2005 To SQL 2000 Affects Performance Of Database.

Sep 21, 2007



Hello,

We previously having two servers A and B. Server A is used for updation of data and the data then replicated to server B. Server B is used for

Server A :
purpose : used for database updation/ modification
SQL Server version : SQL Server 2000 SP 2

Server Z :
purpose : used for Reporting
SQL Server version : SQL Server 2000 SP 2


We were doing Transactional replication from Server A to Server B.

Last month we have broght another server (Server B) with same hardware configuration but having SQL SERVER 2005 installed. This is to speed up our database update process. We have moved some of the database on this new server so that we can achieve our deadlines.

Server B :
purpose : used for database updation/ modification
SQL Server version : SQL Server 2005

I have set up the transactional replication from Server B to Server Z and replication works fine.
However, the issue is after it is started replicating from this new server (Server B) performance of all the queries reduced a lot.(making my life harder)

I didnt expected this as our reporting server is still SQL server 2000.
I have restored the backup of database which was replicated from server A (sql server 2000) and compared execution plan for one of our common query (which is used in most of the reports and which is now taking longer time to provide results)

I found that database which is replicated from Server B (Sql server 2005) is having primary keys. which was not present in the database which replicated from server A(Sql server 2000).

I have then removed the primary key and make the indexes same as previous copy of database(which was replicated from server A) But still the query takes long time.

Execution plan now shows "Table Spool" which was not present in previous copy of database.

Almost every query for this database is taking longer time now.

Can someone suggest me what is wrong and what should I need to fix.

Am I going on the right direction?


View 14 Replies View Related

Combining Peer-to-Peer Transactional Replication With Standard Transactional Replication

Dec 1, 2006

Hello,

I'm interested in combining the Peer-to-Peer Transactional Replication and Standard Transactional Replication to provide a scale out solution of SQL Server 2005. The condition is as follows:

We may have 10 SQL Server 2005 (1 Publisher + 9 Subscriber) running transactional replication in the production environment and allow updates in subscribers. To offload the loading of the publisher, we plan to have 2 Publisher (PubNode1 and PubNode2) using Peer-to-Peer Transaction Replication and the rest 8 subscribers will be divided into 2 groups. The subscribers 1-4 (SubNode1, SubNode2, SubNode3, and SubNode4) will be set to be standard transactional replication subscribers of PubNode1, and the rest 4 subscribers (SubNode5, ..., SubNode8) will be set to be standard transactional replication subscribers of PubNode2.

Is it possible to setup above 2 Publisher + 8 Subscriber topology?
Also, could we set the 8 subscribers with updatable subscriptions to achieve each node is updatable?

We do not plan to set all the 10 nodes using Peer-to-Peer Transactional Replication as it is necessary to make sure n*(n-1)/2 (i.e. 45) peer-to-peer connections is reliable. It seems that the maintenance cost is high if the servers are not in a LAN and the topology is very high coupling. So we prefer to divide the 10 nodes into 2 groups and reduce the cost of each node to maintain the connections to all other sites.

That's the scenario.

Any feedback is welcome and appreciated.

Thanks,
Terence

View 4 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: SSRS Report Is Not Refreshing?

May 12, 2015

I have created an SSRS report, but the data does not refresh. I am using the SSRS Report Buidler to create reports and when I run the query in the dataset, the results return as expected. However, when I run the report itself, the dataset appears old.

View 6 Replies View Related

Manually Triggered Replication?

Aug 8, 2007

I've been studying/experimenting with the replication features and though the Updating Susbcribers Replication Model was the answer to my data environment.

What we want: We have a live server (Publisher) that'll serve content to our users, but we want an "offline/data entry" server (Subscriber) that'll pretty much have the exact same data as the live server for data entry and validation purposes. Changes and inserts would be done on the Subscriber locally, vetted through, and once done, it'd be updated to the Publisher.

I've managed to get some semblance of the above working, but the updates are nearly instantaneous. Which means that changes/inserts that may be erroneous on the subscriber machine would almost always be seen on the publisher machine before our operations can do anything about it.

Is there a way to configure the replication process to hold off until the admin triggers it? Or am I using the wrong feature?

View 4 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: Refreshing MSDB SSIS Packages From One Server To Another

Mar 25, 2015

I was recently tasked with creating an automated process to refresh SSIS packages from MSDB on one server to another and I decided to go the route of using Powershell, however this wasn't as straight forward as I originally imagined so I thought I would share my solution in case others encounter the same request. The below PowerShell code will create all Integration Services folders from the source MSDB (that contain SSIS packages) on the target instance of MSDB then copy all packages to the proper folder locations. The /QUIET option is used to automatically overwrite packages that already exist on the target so make sure you want to overwrite the current versions of your packages before executing.

[Reflection.Assembly]::LoadWithPartialName("Microsoft.SQLServer.ManagedDTS") | out-NULL

$app = New-Object Microsoft.SqlServer.Dts.Runtime.APPLICATION
$SourceServer = "<source server name>"
$TargetServer = "<target server name>"

$Packages = Invoke-Sqlcmd -MaxCharLength 10000000 -ServerInstance $SourceServer -Query "

[Code] .....

View 0 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved