SQL 2012 :: Moving DB Data / Log Files Within AlwaysOn Causing (Recovery Pending)
Jan 9, 2015
I'm trying to move a log file of a database that is part of an availability group. I have been following steps from the article: [URL]
At first this worked fine for me in a test environment. When I tried it in a production environment the database on the secondary went into "Recovery Pending" state and I can't get it out.
I checked to ensure that the dB is looking in the right place for the log file, and it is. It just doesn't seem to actually use the new file. If I start and stop SQL service, the dB comes back up and is fine.
Here are the steps I'm going through and what is happening at each step:
--------------------------------------
:Connect DEVSQL --This is currently PRIMARY
USE[master]
GO
ALTER AVAILABILITY GROUP [DP-AG-DEV] MODIFY REPLICA ON N'DEVSQL' WITH (SECONDARY_ROLE(ALLOW_CONNECTIONS = NO))
[Code] ....
All is good so far. Both the Primary and the Secondard have had their logical files changed, which has not taken affect yet because there has been no failover.
--Make SQL10 the PRIMARY
:Connect SQL10
ALTER AVAILABILITY GROUP [DP-AG-DEV] FAILOVER;
GO
SQL10 is now the Primary for this AG. And, as expected, the database [AG-Test] is in "Recovery Pending" because it is now looking for the log file in the new location. I need to move the file to the new location.
:Connect DEVSQL
--Enable XP_CMDSHELL
sp_configure 'show advanced options',1
go
reconfigure
go
sp_configure 'xp_cmdshell',1
[code].....
This is where the script is failing, returning the error:
Msg 1468, Level 16, State 5, Line 5
The operation cannot be performed on database "AG-Test" because it is involved in a database mirroring session or an availability group. Some operations are not allowed on a database that is participating in a database mirroring session or in an availability group.
Msg 5069, Level 16, State 1, Line 5
ALTER DATABASE statement failed.
I can not get the dB to recognize the log file at it's new location.
If I restart the SQL Service, it comes back fine, which seems to indicate to me that it is not a permission problem and confirms that the file is in the right place.
How do I force SQL to look for the log file again without restarting the service?
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Aug 18, 2014
How to find the pending transactions to be applied on secondary in Always On? Can i get those details from dashboard?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 12, 2013
I have a SQL cluster which ran out of disk the other day. I threw plenty more disk at the SAN. However, 1 of the databases came back with Recovery Pending and has been over 24 hours. I have tried to backup the database with no success. I don't have a clean backup from the day it occured so would have a good amount of work missing.
Running a dbcc check returns the following:
Msg 945, Level 14, State 2, Line 1
Database 'sqldb' cannot be opened due to inaccessible files or insufficient memory or disk space. See the SQL Server errorlog for details.
I have not tried a dbcc check with REPAIR_ALLOW_DATA_LOSS as there seems to be a high risk of losing whatever was going on. how I can get the db back online?
View 10 Replies
View Related
May 31, 2015
Is it alright to move the .bak and .trn backups which are automatically created in a File Share Witness when a DB is added to an Availability Group? I did that and there were error IDs 1069 occurring, and the AG was unable to be brought up whenever I run a load intensive batch job ...
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 27, 2015
We have several read-only nodes in our AlwaysOn cluster, which are set to use Synchronous-commit mode, which ensures that the logs are updated on the read-only nodes before any update statements complete. Even with this option, if we query a read-only node before the logs have been processed, we can read old data. I would like to know a strategy to ensure that a read-only query will definitely return up to date information. I had an idea that if I just used a different transaction type, like Serializable, that it might block the read-only query from actually getting the data until after the log file was processed, but I have not tried it, yet.
I would like to move more queries to the read-only nodes, in an effort to offload CPU utilization from the primary node.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 17, 2015
We have a requirement to build SQL environment which will give us local high availability and disaster recovery to second site. We have two sites- Site A & Site B. We are planning to have two nodes at Site A and 2 nodes at Site B. All four nodes will be part of same Windows failover cluster. We will build two SQL Cluster, InstanceA will be clustered between the nodes at Site A Server and InstanceB will be clustered between the nodes at Site B, we will enable Always On Between the InstanceA and InstanceB and will be primary owner where data will be written on InstanceA and will be replicated to InstaceB. URL....Now we want we will have instanceC on the Site B and data will be writen from the application available on Site B, will be replicated to the instance on the Site A as replica.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jun 30, 2015
i've change the database log file from E drive to Drive due to insufficient space.without attaching the log file i've shutdown the sytem. becz it's gone in hand mode.post resuming its showing recovery pending.i'm unable to get online db.
View 15 Replies
View Related
Jun 12, 2015
I have a DB shown as recovery pending when running the following:
SELECT Name, state_desc
FROM sys.databases;
The DB was created by someone outside of our team using the Full Recovery model & I can see that no transaction log backups have been taken for this, causing the log to growth to a large size.
The MDF is only 5,120kb but the TRN has grown to 10,773,120kb
When I checked the Server I could see the data area had run out of space so I have freed up some space for this so now have 2.5gb available as a short term solution.
The MDF & LDF files are still visible & when checking the SQL log the DB is being reported as having a Full Transaction Log.
Essentially I want to change the Recovery Model from Full to Simple, Reduce the size of the transaction log & bring the DB back online. Luckily this DB is only used by a handful of users but I still need to get it up & running asap.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Feb 11, 2014
Trying to find out if this is the best way to move log files in databases that are in an availability group.
remove the DB from the AG
Run alter database commands like you would normally to take offline ,move file,bring online ,etc
drop the db from secondary node
then rejoin the DB to the AG
Is that the only option for moving them when its in an avail group? cant find any other info on moving files in mirrors or HA groups
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 21, 2015
I am using Sql Server 2012 in always on configuration with multi subnet failover clustering. Size of data file has suddenly increased, i dropped all the unnecessary table from database three days back. day before yesterday i tried shrinking data file using DBCC command but it is taking too much time. is there any other option for deallocating the space.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2015
We have 2 switch between primary and secondary this morning.
after that one database in secondary went to "initializing / recovery pending".
How can i exit from this situation ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 5, 2014
I have a two node SQL 2012 AlwaysOn HADR cluster (v11.0.3412) with 4 availability groups configured. The AG groups are set to synchronous mode and the secondary is not readable (we do not want the synchronous replica readable so we do not risk any reads causing contention so we maintain fast performance).
On the secondary we are getting a persistent failure with the Data Collector job called Collection_Set_3_Upload. The failure occurs within the second job step. That job step is executing the following command:
dcexec -u -s 3 -i "$(ESCAPE_DQUOTE(MACH))$(ESCAPE_DQUOTE(INST))"
The error message is as follows:
Log Job History (collection_set_3_upload) Step ID 2 Server CLUSTERNODE2
Job Name collection_set_3_upload
Step Name collection_set_3_upload_upload
Duration 00:00:07
[Code] ....
I know I can prevent this error message by enabling readable secondaries, but we do not want this.
I have tried stopping the data collection jobs and purging the cache directory but to no avail. It will succeed the first time then persistently fail again with the same message every time after that.
In addition, if I set the one failing AG group to readable secondary the job succeeds. So that means that 3/4 work fine, only this one is having an issue.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Aug 14, 2014
I'm moving data from one database to another (INSERT INTO ... SELECT ... FROM ....) and am encountering this error:
Msg 8114, Level 16, State 5, Line 6
Error converting data type varchar to numeric.
My problem is that Line 6 is:
set @brn_pk = '0D4BDE66347C440F'
so that is obviously not the problem and my query has almost 200 columns. I can go through one by one and compare what column is int in my destination table and what is varchar in my source tables, but that could take quite a while. How I can work out what column is causing the problem?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 29, 2015
I have a database [CarlosDB] that currently has it's .MDF on E: and I need to move the x2 .NDF data files off C: to E:data using a single T-SQL statement:
Code:
database_id file_id db_name disk_path status size read_only
----------- ----------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 1 CarlosDB E:dataCarlosDB.mdf ONLINE 384 0
7 2 CarlosDB_log L:logsCarlosDB_log.ldf ONLINE 128 0
7 3 CarlosDB_2 C:sqlCarlosDB_2.ndf ONLINE 128 0
7 4 CarlosDB_3 C:sqlCarlosDB_3.ndf ONLINE 128 0
(4 row(s) affected)
Looking at the file configuration above, what would be the most logical way as a DBA / SQL Server 2014 Std to move the NDF files to live w/ the MDF file using:
Code:
EXEC master.dbo.xp_cmdshell 'copy c:sqlCarlosDB_2.ndf e:dataCarlosDB_2/ndf'...
but cleanly using a single T-SQL statement? properly formatting a single T-SQL query to use the xp_cmdshell system stored procedure.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
Hello, I have been having a bit of trouble finding help on the safestway to move data files to a different disk on the same server. Mosthelp is about moving data files to a different sqlserver. I just wantto move the files to a different drive on the same server. Any helpwould be appreciated.Thanks,David
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 3, 2015
We have SQL cluster installed on top of windows cluster on VM environment. Node1 and Node2 under Windows Failover Cluster. SQL instance is currently on node2 the instance is up and running, but SQL Cluster service remains online pending and it restarts the instance on every 5 minutes.
SQL Browser service are running successfully.TCP/IP ports are enabled and configured.If we start the SQL server agent it is on for seconds and stopped immediately .Cluster Service is attempt to connect to the SQL service every few minutes (setting in SQL cluster resource) for the IsAlive check, if this fails then the SQL resource is restarted even if the instance was online. Hope this is what happening exactly.
[sqsrvres] ODBC Error: [08001] [Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]SQL Server Network Interfaces: Error Locating Server/Instance Specified [xFFFFFFFF]. (268435455)
00001024.00053314::2015/10/30-19:57:50.772 ERR [RES] SQL Server <SQL Server (SIMAH_COMMDB)>: [sqsrvres] ODBC Error: [HYT00] [Microsoft][SQL Server Native Client 11.0]Login timeout expired (0)
00001024.00053314::2015/10/30-19:57:50.772 ERR [RES] SQL Server <SQL Server (SIMAH_COMMDB)>: [sqsrvres] ODBC Error: [08001] [Microsoft][SQL Server
Native Client 11.0]A network-related or instance-specific error has occurred while establishing a connection to SQL Server. Server is not found or not accessible. Check if instance name is correct and if SQL Server is configured to allow remote connections. For more information see SQL Server Books
Online. (268435455)
00001024.00053314::2015/10/30-19:57:50.772 INFO [RES] SQL Server <SQL Server (SIMAH_COMMDB)>: [sqsrvres] Could not connect to SQL Server (rc -1
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 16, 2015
Can we set up always on availability groups in server 2012 standard edition.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 6, 2015
We have a client which they have production 2 node cluster environment. On it around 200 databases with single SQL instance.
Now client wants disatster plan for these 200 database. In these 200 database 3 db's are around 80 GB each databases remaing are less than 5 DB.Note: All these 200 db's are having produciton sites (i mean to say each db is having single site)
For this DR paln clinet is going to provide other DR server,they wants to setup DR between exsting produciton cluster instance to this DR server.
So in this case we have suggest SQL server AlwaysOn availability group.
Here my main question is can we keep all these databases in single AG? .If yes, guidlines to move up. if not, do we have any limitations.Also, best method to setup for this DR plan.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Oct 16, 2015
Merge replication on AlwayOn is configured, working fine on Original Publisher.When failover to possible publisher data is not being replicated.
Replication Monitor Error:
Message: Validation failed for the publisher 'RIMDNS' with error 21879 severity 16 message 'Unable to query the redirected server 'RIMDNS' for original publisher 'UNITEDKINGDOM' and publisher database 'TD_AO11' to determine the name of the remote server; Error
2, Error message 'Error 2, Level 16, State 1, Message: Named Pipes Provider: Could not open a connection to SQL Server [2]. '. '.
[Code] ....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 29, 2014
How many maximum database's can we have in AlwaysON Availability Group?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 12, 2015
I've set up a SQL server 2014 cluster with AlwaysOn availability groups. Upon creating the AG i opted for full syncronisation to a specific SMB share.Now i want to change that share because it has to move to a new server. How can i do that? I found no settings in the SSMS for that.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 14, 2015
We have an AG scenario where we are using WFC on a 2 node cluster. We are then using AG for mirroring the databases to both nodes and have a listener.
What I want to do next is to establish another copy of the database at a remote location. But I don't want to add the 3rd system to the WFC. I am not a big fan of WFC and I have seen it causes many more problems. The 3rd system will be in a remote location and the network not 100% reliable. I have seen in the past that it causes the entire cluster to hang and causing my production to crash which I don't want.
I there a way to add a 3rd node to the mirror configuration. I don't know if I can add a 3rd node to the AG unless it is part of the same cluster.
I know I can configure log shipping, I am fine with it but in the source, I have no control of which node the DB will be. I am not sure if a log shipping scenario can be configured using the listener instead of the physical host.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 13, 2015
How do I add my second (secondary) node in my AlwaysOn Availability Group, after adding my head node, and the secondary node is a virtual machine. See based on the attached file if it is the correct way?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 16, 2015
We've just started using AlwaysOn High Availability and run into a wierd issue. I have 1 particular database that is not syncing data to the secondary replica. But when i look at all the dashboards, everything is green, they all say synchronised - but if I query the data they are not.
The database has additional sql transactional 1 way replication a different server which i was wondering if was causing any problems, but it's working ok.
I'm just wondering if there's any other more detailed logs i can check to see why the data is not flowing. The availability dashboard and it's event log all says ok.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 3, 2015
In the case of a manual failover, what happens to open transactions. Are they killed (rolled back), completed, a little bit of both?
Does the status of the query has any impact (are running queries handled differently then waiting ones, does the type of wait have an impact...)
I am using synchronous commit mode and all I seem to find is reference to the potential or absense of loss of data.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 3, 2015
How to test always on availablity after configuring them.I have configured always on group with 1 active and 1 passive with readonly.I want to test from application.what are cases which we can have for testing.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 19, 2015
My environment has a 4 node cluster , 2 in primary and 2 in sec dc. Storage is sperate for both.
Need to setup always on for 4 Instances there on the 2 nodes of the primary dc. Is there any restriction in setting up always on for multiple instances for a cluster.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 28, 2015
I know that AlwaysOn creates a WSFC role in order to provide failover of the Availability Group Listener. But does it also "honor" the WSFC network setttings? What I'd like to do is isolate the client-side traffic from the database replication traffic. But it's not clear to me that AlwaysOn even uses that part of WSFC.
a) Can you totally isolate the traffic as I've described?
b) Does AlwaysON actually use WSFC network settings? If yes, then I guess I cannot do what I want, since my choices are Cluster & Client, or Cluster Only.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 14, 2015
I have had a serious issue with a production AlwaysOn cluster whereby the service did not successfully transition to the secondary node and I cannot find the root cause of the issue.
Some details: It is a 2 node cluster (same datacenter) with a shared disk quorum, Windows Server 2012, both are virtual machines running on VMWare vSphere 5.5. SQL Server version is 2012 Enterprise SP2 CU6
The failover occurred because of a network incident (a spanning tree recalculation caused a connection timeout between both nodes). Initial entries in the SQL Log look normal for this event, for example:
05/08/2015 11:18:06: A connection timeout has occurred on a previously established connection to availability replica 'FIN-IE-PA078' with id [6910F4A9-87E7-4836-BA79-0F41BE90266D]. Either a networking or a firewall issue exists or the availability replica has transitioned to the resolving role.
05/08/2015 11:18:06: AlwaysOn Availability Groups connection with secondary database terminated for primary database 'UserManagement' on the availability replica with Replica ID: {6910f4a9-87e7-4836-ba79-0f41be90266d}. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
[code]....
My interpretation of this is that the cluster failover attempts failed, because the network condition still persisted. The network interruption lasted approximately 2 minutes, and I would have expected the cluster to come back online at this point, after the restart delay period as suggested in the last entry in the error log. However this did not happen.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Sep 18, 2015
We have a SQLServer 2012 Always-On Availability (AAG) Primary and Secondary Node installation/environments. On the Primary node, we have some databases that have the TRUSTWORTHY option enabled (Set to ON). But when the databases are synched/added to the AAG the databases loose the TRUSTWORTHY property and are reset to OFF on the Secondary Node.Because of this,When the instance fails over to the Secondary Node the applications that were working don’t work anymore.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 30, 2015
we have to build high availability SQL 2012 cluster for VDI and we have two options. One option is to build a server cluster with combination of failover and mirroring and other option is to build failover cluster with AlwaysOn.We are not sure which option to chose. We have contacted Microsoft support to provide us some documents and instructions for failovermirroring combination but they have send us instructions for AlwaysOn option.
What would be best way to build high availability cluster for VDI? Also, since first option is very complicated.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 29, 2015
I have configured AlwaysOn HA setup with HyperV environments without shared disk and using quorum voting in file share witness.
1. I want to monitor AlwaysOn HA setup and AO Group database on daily basis.
2. To configure email alerts for proactive monitoring if unusual events occur.
Scripts for monitoring in that AO setup as well as AO group database ...
View 8 Replies
View Related
Sep 5, 2012
I have a 3-nodes AlwaysOn cluster (Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 + SQL Server 2012 RTM), Node Majority quorum, the quorum vote for each node is 1.
Today the AlwaysOn AG was suddenly down due to the cluster service on node 1 stopped and can't be started.
The error in eventlog is -
The cluster database could not be loaded. The file may be missing or corrupt. Automatic repair might be attempted.
The Cluster Service service terminated unexpectedly. It has done this 2 time(s). The following corrective action will be taken in 120000 milliseconds: Restart the service.
The failover cluster database could not be unloaded. If restarting the cluster service does not fix the problem, please restart the machine.
The Cluster Service service terminated with service-specific error The system cannot find the file specified..
The error log in cluster log is -
0000156c.000008f8::2012/09/05-08:09:36.057 INFO [DM] Key RegistryMachineCluster.restored does not appear to be loaded (status STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND(c0000034))
0000156c.000008f8::2012/09/05-08:09:36.057 WARN [DM] Node 1: Failed to unload restored hive from the registry with error STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER(c000000d)
0000156c.000008f8::2012/09/05-08:09:36.057 INFO [DM] Node 1: loading local hive
0000156c.000008f8::2012/09/05-08:09:36.057 ERR [DM] Node 1: failed to unload cluster hive, error 2.
Now the cluster service can't be started on node 1, error code 2. Looks like the clusdb in C:windowscluster is missing or corrupted. How to restore the clusdb file? And how to prevent this happen again?
All nodes were well patched, AlwaysOn and cluster related hotfixes were all installed. [URL] .... doesn't wok.
View 4 Replies
View Related