I need to return 1 ip address for each machine. I can easily achieve this with using group by and return max(ipaddress) however I would like to filter out specific range '192.168.%' but only want to do that if machine has more then 1 ip address. If the machine has only 1 ip address then it can return it even if its '192.168.%'
below is test table to show sample data
CREATE TABLE dbo.[testip](
[machineid] INT NULL,
[ipaddress] [varchar](20) NULL
)
GO
INSERT INTO [dbo].[testip] ([machineid],[ipaddress]) VALUES (1,'155.119.1.22')
INSERT INTO [dbo].[testip] ([machineid],[ipaddress]) VALUES (1,'192.168.1.5')
This store procedure will get some executable queries from the select statement, the cursor will fetch each rows to execute the query and insert the queries into table_3 to mark as 'E'. Until 17:00, this store procedure will stop execute the queries and just get the queries from select statement insert into table_3 to mark as 'C'.
I don't know why the outputs in table_3 are quiet different than I think. This store procedure comes out with two exactly same queries and one marked as C and another marked as E.
CREATE PROCEDURE procedure1 AS DECLARE cursor_1 CURSOR FOR SELECT 'This is a executable query' FROM table_1 DECLARE @table_2
Generally, on any screen, we design filter screen by allowing user to identify range or one value to search. But sometime in some screen, It will be more convenient for user if user can identify No matter how value to search.
For example On screen which have information of people in any province. So user would like to search it by identify no matter how value to search. There are check box of any province on filter part which enable users choose it.
Hence, if sometime user choose (by clicking on checkbox) 3 provinces : LA, Michigan, WachingtonDC to see description only 3 chosen province. and sometime user choose (by clicking on checkbox) 2 provinces : LA, Michigan to see description only 2 chosen provinces.
Please give me any idea for create Stored Procedure or any tecnique to complete my idea....
One of my models has order data, cost per order/invoice ID and then dimensions on Fiscal Year, category, etc...the usual.
A user wanted to search it for an exact order amount. (They knew for example that one of our accounts was not balancing by single order worth $746.13 and assumed it must be an order that was placed but never marked shipped that slipped through the cracks).
Now, in the model I have "order amount" as a field and then a measure that sums that.
I could expose that "order amount" field as a label and let them filter on it in Excel (and that works).
However, I haven't had any luck filtering on the actual measure "Total Order Amount". Such as OrderID-> View Filter -> "Total Order Amount" equals 746.13.
I assume this is due to a few things:
Measure calculates at different levels so filtering on a measure is difficult as you would have to place all the "slicers" and set them first before the measure would "exist" at a level where it could be $746.13. Orders by year would have $746.13 as part of it's year sum, but wouldn't exist as a stand alone line item orders by year 2015 might be 2 million.
Orders by category might exist at 500,000, 8,000, 15,146.36, etc... but not $746.13.
So I would need OrderID on there as a column so the measure could return at the value of $746.13 for one row for it to match the filter?
Basically: 1. Why it can't really filter on a measure? 2. Is there a better way to accomplish this other than exposing the actual column in the fact table "order amount" as it feels like that could cause all kinds of confusion if other users try to slice/filter on that not realizing exactly what it is meant to be?
Hi friendsI have little problem here.I am creating data tables dynamically.I want to filter it using sql query.Suppose, I have four data tables with the same structure but records may be different.There are two fields ServiceMethod and Rates.Now I want to filter all tables and want to get match records with the ServiceMethod.Suppose,four records in First table,three records in other three tables,and only two records(Service method) are same in all tables.I want to that two records by filtering all tables and sum of rates and want to add matched records in new table and bind dropdownlist.Can any guide me how to filter more than one tables using sql query if data tables are created dynamically?Thanks in advance.
We have a "main" SQL 2014 server who imports XML files using SSIS in a datacenter. In remote sites (which are warehouses), there is an instance of SQL 2014 Express. A merge replication is setup, as every operations done on each site must be "forwared" to the main database, as some XML files are generated as output for an ERP system.
Now, the merge replication replicate all the data to the server on each sites. But a specific site don't need the data of every other sites, only the data relevant to itself (which is the warehouse code). Is there a way to replicate only the data relevant to each individual sites to the subscribers? Or is there a better way than replication to accomplish this?
I am very early on in developing a website to track issues with projects which is tied to a SQL database. I have my Projects Table, my Users Table, and am creating a third table to track issues. I'm wondering what is the best way to assign specific users to specific data/projects. The user should only be able to view & update the projects assigned to him. He should not be able to see other projects. What is the best way to assign projects/data to the users to make sure they are only viewing their data?
I have the table below and want to show the prop_code if the rent_review_date count is less than 1 in 12 months. This means to show only propcode if there has not been any rent update since the first rent_review_date
DECLARE @table TABLE ( Prop_Code INT ,Current_Rent INT ,Revised_Rent INT ,Rent_Review_Date varchar(10) ,Rent_Review_Time DATEtime)
CREATE TABLE #Names ( ID INT IDENTITY(1,1), NAME VARCHAR(100) ) INSERT INTO #Names VALUES ('S-SQLXX') INSERT INTO #Names VALUES ('S-SQLXX.NA.SN.ORG') INSERT INTO #Names VALUES ('S-SQLYY') INSERT INTO #Names VALUES ('S-SQLYY.NA.SN.ORG') INSERT INTO #Names VALUES ('S-SQLCL-HR') INSERT INTO #Names VALUES ('S-SQLCL-MIS') SELECT * FROM #Names
--I want to filter out S-SQLXX.NA.SN.ORG because S-SQLXX.NA.SN.ORG is a duplicate of S-SQLXX eliminating .NA.SN.ORG from it.
--I want to filter out S-SQLYY.NA.SN.ORG because S-SQLYY.NA.SN.ORG is a duplicate of S-SQLYY eliminating .NA.SN.ORG from it.
--However I want to keep S-SQLCL-HR and S-SQLCL-MIS in my list of names as they do not have .NA.SN.ORG as a part of their name
--I want ONLY these returned IN the SELECT
SELECT * FROM #Names WHERE ID IN (1,3,5,6) DROP TABLE #Names
We have a table in an SQL Server 2012 database that stores tree-like structures. Simplified for the purpose of my question, it has the following format:
Id int identity, ParentId int, GroupId int
Each record of the table represents an object identified by Id. An object may or may not have a parent in the same table, such that object.ParentId = parentObject.Id. A root object has ParentId = NULL. There are multiple root objects, so the table in fact stores multiple trees. What’s important is that the tree depth is not fixed, i.e. theoretically there can be any number of ancestor generations for an object. GroupId is a property of a root object; in theory none of the children of a root object has to have GroupId <> NULL; it can be assumed that any child has the same GroupId value as its root object.
A sample table having two roots (one grandparent and one parent), one non-root parent/child and 4 child roots:
The table is not normalised, i.e. there’s no separate {root_object : group} table. However I don’t think normalising the table would solve the problem.
Now the problem. We need to set up merge replication from the table above (Master table) to the table of the same format in another DB. We need to replicate only those rows of the Master table that have a certain fixed GroupId value, e.g. 200 in the example above. If we ensure that GroupId in all descendant objects of a root object has the same value in the table as the root object itself that would be trivial. The table would look like this:
However out of performance considerations, we would like to avoid if possible filling GroupId for the descendant objects, because as it must be clear from the above, GroupId for a descendant object is quite easily deducible via a stored procedure or UDF (just need to go up the tree until ParentId = NULL). The problem is, I don’t know how to achieve this in a merge replication filter: it would only allow WHERE conditions and joins. I’ve have not had much luck with joins for merge replication in general, but here we have more complex algorithm, because the number of tree levels can be different for every object. And merge replication would not allow using UDF…
I am writing a script to get all of the user objects out of a database. What I am having a hard time doing is filtering out the MS replication system objects, such as:
So the cluster install forced us to install Full-Text on our cluster (which we don't want to use, but I guess we don't have a choice about installing it). Now I'm going through to update the services from Manual to Automatic (on the appropriate nodes) and I see SQL Full-text Filter Daemon Launcher running.
What is the harm in turning it off if we're not using Full-Text capabilities?
I want to select all the records, and them them be in alphabetical order first by lastname, then by firstname, then by address. HOWEVER, and this is the tricky part, I want to group names together that have the same address. So, in this example, I want the results to be in this order:
HallC6309 N Olive HallP6309 N Olive <---- grouped with the C record because they have the same address HallE5488 W Catalina <---- back to alphabetical by first name HallJ7222 N Cocopas
I have an SQL .bak file and I would only like to restore specific columns as one of the columns is a free text field and is substantially increasing the size of the file. I can't restore it due to disk space constraints so dropping the column isn't possible if I can't get the table into a database locally.
I was looking for a little insight on Resource Governor. I have a request from my manager to limit the resources a certain third party's DB can use on our system. We allow them to keep a DB on our SQL 2012 server so they can run query's to compare data to their server without linking the two machines.
I was looking into resource manager to perhaps accomplish this task but I'm not real familiar with it. If Resource governor can be used to only allow a DB named UserDB1 to use only 1GB or Memory at any one time?
Or perhaps there is another way aside from Resource governor?
write a query which retrieves only unique rows excluding some columns.
IdStatusmanager Team Comments Proj number Date 19391New XUnassigned One 3732.0 16-Apr-14 19392Can YCustomer Two 3732.0 17-Apr-14 19393Can YCustomer Two 3732.0 17-Apr-14 19394Can YCustomer One 3732.0 18-Apr-14 19395New YCustomer One 3732.0 19-Apr-14 19396New YCustomer One 3732.0 21-Apr-14 19397New ZCustomer One 3732.0 20-Apr-14
In the above table project number and id shouldn't be considered and I should get the unique rows considering rest of columns and sorted based on date. Expected result is
IdStatusmanager Team Comments Proj number Date 19391New XUnassigned One 3732.0 16-Apr-14 19392Can YCustomer Two 3732.0 17-Apr-14 19394Can YCustomer One 3732.0 18-Apr-14 19395New YCustomer One 3732.0 19-Apr-14 19397New ZCustomer One 3732.0 20-Apr-14 19396New YCustomer One 3732.0 21-Apr-14
I've got an OLEDB DB2 linked server to a db2/AS400 instance and selecting from a table on the server has never caused problems before. One of the columns is a large text field. If I select all the columns but the large text field, it returns as normal, but including the large text field now, I get:
"Transport error: shared memory provider error: 0 - no process is on the other end of the pipe"
The largest entry in the text field is about 5k characters, and there don't appear to be any strange characters.
INSERT INTO Query_results(login_name, total_elapsed_time, total_elapsed_time) SELECT login_name, total_elapsed_time, total_elapsed_time FROM sys.dm_exec_sessions
I need to then kill all sessions at 11:59pm then log all those that are killed. This is so I can schedule a job at that time, I have sessions that are blocking my job.
I have written a SQL statement.There is a table called customer.It contains all customer data with customerid as PK.There is another table called logs and it contains customerid as foreign key and it contains a field to keep more than 90 days older user accounts.That field name is "Checked"
What I need get all records from these 2 tables and remove/hide more than 90 days older customers from record set.See my illustration.
I have written this code but I dont understand how to remove more than 90 days older user from result (because customer table doesnt contain a record called "Checked")
SELECT * FROM [dbo].[Customers],[dbo].[VIESLog] WHERE [dbo].[VIESLog].[Checked] < DATEADD(day, -90, GETDATE())
I need to export the data directly using a query from sql server. This is just a temporary extract. Copy pasting the result in excel is giving mis-alignment.
I'm trying to extract some data from an XML column, into the demo below I would like to obtain the CommandText value but my attempts so far are in vain, I'm fairly sure its just a path issue in the .query command but I just can't seem to get it to work.
Today we were trying to use restore wizard (recovery advisor) to restore a database which is over 80 GB, but the wizard won't load or start. However the wizard dialog box opens without any problems with all other databases stored in the instance. Is there any problem or reason to why the restore wizard won't come up?
This is SQL 2012 enterprise version we are running.
I'm trying to configure a named instances of SQL Server 2012 SP2 to have specific IP addresses and listen to that IP on port 1433. Alongside this, I have the default instance running on a different IP and listening to that on port 1433.I've managed to get them configured so that they are reachable using the IP, and looking at the log for each they are listening correctly on that IP on port 1433; in addition, the default instance connects fine using the SERVERNAME.However, when I try and connect to the named instance using the SERVERNAME/INSTANCENAME syntax, I receive the following:-
"Cannot connect to SERVERINSTANCE. Instance failure. (System.Data)"
Configuration for the TCP/IP protocol for that instance is as follows:-
Protocol Tab
Enabled= Yes Keep Alive = 30000 Listen All = No
IP addresses Tab
IP1 Active = Yes Enabled = Yes IP Address = 10.1.1.1 TCP Dynamic Ports = 0 TCP Port = 1433
[code]...
The SQL Browser service is running and prior to switching off Listen To All, I could connect to the instance remotely using the instance name.
