SQL 2012 :: Query To Understand Names Of All Available Tables / Number Of Records
Aug 31, 2014SQL query to understand the names of all the available tables , number of records in these tables and size of these tables?
View 4 RepliesSQL query to understand the names of all the available tables , number of records in these tables and size of these tables?
View 4 RepliesSQL query to understand the names of all the available tables in the database , number of records in these tables and size of these tables ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am using the following select statement to get the row count from SQL linked server table.
SELECT Count(*) FROM OPENQUERY (CMSPROD, 'Select * From MHDLIB.MHSERV0P')
MHDLIB is the library name in IBM DB2 database. The above query gives me only the row count of table MHSERV0P. However, I need to get the names, rowcounts, and sizes of all tables that exist in MHDLIB librray. Is it possible at all?
writing the query for the following, I need to collapse the continuity. If the termdate for an ID is one day less than the effdate of the next id (for the same ID) i need to collapse the records. See below example .....how should i write the query which will give me the desired output. i.e., get min(effdate) and max(termdate) if termdate is one day less than the effdate of next record.
ID effdate termdate
556868 1999-01-01 1999-06-30
556868 1999-07-01 1999-10-31
556869 2002-10-01 2004-01-31
556872 1999-02-01 2000-08-31
556872 2000-11-01 2004-01-31
556872 2004-02-01 2004-02-29
output should be ......
ID effdate termdate
556868 1999-01-01 1999-10-31
556869 2002-10-01 2004-01-31
556872 1999-02-01 2000-08-31
556872 2000-11-01 2004-02-29
how to find the names of the tables owned by the particular user in sql server and how to display the distinct object types owned by the particular user.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWith this query i get only the records i need, but i would like to output in this way
1 - 20
21 - 30
31 - 40
of course in the real environment the ID are not consecutive, this is just one example of data.
declare @temp table (ID int)
declare @i int = 1
while(@i<1000) begin
insert into @temp values (@i)
set @i=@i+1
end
select ID from (
select ID, row_number() over (order by ID)
as rn
from @temp
) q where (rn % 20=0) OR (rn % 20=1)
I have the following scenario:
SQL database on SQL 2012
Large Production table 15 Million record
The table has 3 years of data
New monthly data is being added every month.
A New Monthly data is being loaded, checked and finally approved after 6 or 7 iteration before approval.Because of this iteration the monthly data set is being added then deleted then added then deleted few times.Because the table is big this process takes time, any thoughts on how to make the delete insert process faster.Keep in mind I cannot do much because it is a production table and is being access by other users to do other analysis.
Delete is done based on trx_date which is a year/month combo, like 201508.
The table has monthly sales by customer aggregated.
The table structure is:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Sales](
[batch_key] [int] NOT NULL,
[Company_key] [int] NOT NULL,
[customer_key] [char](22) NOT NULL,
[Trx_Date] [int] NOT NULL,
[account] [nvarchar](35) NOT NULL,
[code].....
I have query which is used to dynamically insert value but not working. We are trying to get all table names and insert dynamically to all tables by looping through table names.
declare @a varchar(max),@i int;
declare @table table(rno int, name varchar(max))
declare @b varchar(max)
insert into @table
select row_number() over( order by table_name) rno, table_name from INFORMATION_SCHEMA.tables
declare @tblname varchar(max)
[Code] .....
I have two different tables... one for all Staff, and another for all Temp Staff. I need both to output to a datagrid, and so I need to grab both tables from a SQL query to output to my datagrid, but I can't seem to get the logic right for it to work. Can someone give me some suggestions on why my results are blank when I'm running this query? I thought a simple join would allow both sets of identical column names to coexist in peace...SELECT TOP 100 PERCENT dbo.StaffDirectory.UserName, dbo.StaffDirectory.LastName, dbo.StaffDirectory.FirstName, dbo.StaffDirectory.Dept, dbo.StaffDirectory.Title, dbo.StaffDirectory.EMail, dbo.StaffDirectory.LocationFROM dbo.StaffDirectory INNER JOIN dbo.TempStaff ON dbo.StaffDirectory.Location = dbo.TempStaff.Location AND dbo.StaffDirectory.EMail = dbo.TempStaff.Email AND dbo.StaffDirectory.Title = dbo.TempStaff.Title AND dbo.StaffDirectory.Dept = dbo.TempStaff.Dept AND dbo.StaffDirectory.FirstName = dbo.TempStaff.FName AND dbo.StaffDirectory.LastName = dbo.TempStaff.LName AND dbo.StaffDirectory.UserName = dbo.TempStaff.UName AND dbo.StaffDirectory.MDNo = dbo.TempStaff.MDNoIs something wrong here? It just doesn't work =(Any suggestions would be really appreciated.Thank you
View 5 Replies View RelatedI'm looking for a query that will return all index names, the table the index is on and the columns in the index...
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi,
I need a query to get the index names of particular tables. for eg.. i have some tables like emp_data,emp_job....etc..Now i want to find all indexe names for those tablenames that starts with emp........ Plz help me...
Hi,
ive a table of over 90,000 records . is ther any method for restricting the number of records returned by a SELECT query
i want to implement a query system which will give me the first 50 records, next 50 ,... and so on
can ne body help ?
Here with the below query iam binding my gridview with industry name,company name,Plant Name,Group Name related to the IDs in Audit table.Select Aud.Ad_ID_PK,Aud.Audit_Name,Ind.Industry_Name,Cmp.Company_Name,Pla.Plant_Name,Gr.Groups_Name,Aud.Audit_Started_On,Aud.Audit_Scheduledto,Aud.Audit_Created_On from
Industry Ind,
Company Cmp,
Plant Pla,
Groups Gr,
Audits Audwhere Ind.Ind_Id_PK =Aud.Audit_Industry and
Cmp.Cmp_ID_PK =Aud.Audit_Company and
Pla.Pl_ID_PK =Aud.Audit_Plant and
Gr.G_ID_PK =Aud.Audit_Group and
Ad_ID_PK in (select Ad_ID_PK from Audits)
Now i want to edit these names.
when i click on edit in gridview these names will be filled into textboxes and when i change the names it should compare the name with particular tables and should get the Id of that and store in Audits table.
For example:
i have this data in my audits table:
Commercial83312
2
2
2
1
Here Commercial83312 is ID of that Audit and 2,2,2,1 are the Industry,Company,Plant and group Ids for that particular audit.In the front end i can see the names of this particular IDs.
when i edit the industry name in the UI it must check the name with industry table and get the ID of the changed name and store it in audit table.
so the data may be changed in audits table as :
Commercial83312
4
2
2
1
so here the industry ID is changed
I need the stored procedure for this.
please help me,its very urgent...
What is the maximum no.of global temporary tables can create in sql server
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am trying to return the number of records found by the query but keep seeing -1 in label1. This query should return many records.
sub findcustomers(sender as object,e as eventargs) dim connection1 as sqlconnection=new sqlconnection(...) dim q1 as string="select * from tblcustomers where store='65'" dim command1 as sqlcommand=new sqlcommand(q1,connection1) dim a as integer command1.connection.open() a=command1.executenonquery() label1.text=a.tostring() command1.connection.close() end sub
What am I doing wrong?
What I would like to do is to have a TSQL Select return the number of records in the Result as if TOP (n) had not been used. Example:I have a table called Orders containing more than 1.000 records with OrderDate = '2015/07/21' and my client application has a threshold for returning records at 100 and therefore the TSQL would look like
SELECT TOP (100) * FROM Orders Where OrderDate = '2015/07/21' ORDER by OrderTime Desc
Now I would like to "tell" the client that only 100 of 1.000 records are shown in the client application grid. Is there a way to return a value indicating that if TOP (100) had not been used the resultset would have been 1.000. I know I could create the same TSQL using COUNT() (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Orders Where OrderDate = '2015/07/21' ORDER by OrderTime Desc) and return that in a variable in the SELECT statement or even creating the COUNT() as a subquery and return it as a column, but I would like to avoid running multiple TSQL's. Since SQL Server already needs to select the entire recordset and sort it (ORDER BY) and return only the first 100 the total number of records in the initial snapshot must somehow be available.
Other than right-clicking on each individual table in SSMS and generating a CREATE script, is there a simple way to generate CREATE TABLE scripts for tables within a given database?
Background: I have a bunch of tables in one database, and I would like to add tables to a second database that have the same names and basic structures of some of the tables from the first database.
I do not need to transfer any data from the tables, this is a seperate project that will use a similar data structure. I just want to generate the CREATE TABLE scripts for 30ish tables within the first database, and then I'll tweak the scripts as appropriate and run them against the new database.
[URL] ....
Hi,
I'm using SqlDataSource control.
Is there a way to know how many records a query has returned?
I'm using the query desinger in ASP.NET , however the number of recordsin the resultset are not displaying, so I cut and paste it into Queryanalyzer which is silly.How do I set this in the output window, or result grid?Thanks Moe
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have tried joining several tables and the result displays duplicate rows of virtually every line/row. I have tried using distinct but this didn't work. I know it could because there's several columns from some of the tables named the same.
select purchaseorders.traderid,
suppliers.name
stockbatches.partid,
allpartmaster.partdesc,
allpartmaster.prodgroup,
[Code]....
i have this query in a proc
declare @bu_id INT,
@CurCaptureDate DATETIME,
@user_id INT,
@col_name VARCHAR(100),
@sort_order VARCHAR(4),
@CityPair_ID INT=NULL,
[code]....
where @reasons and @departure_code can be multiple.
We have some requirement in PowerBI reports. Here we have a table and having Date, Events columns. Below is the sample data..we are creating a measure to calculate the average of the event count for month.We need a measure for calculating Average of Event count per month= sum(Events for a month)/numberofdays in the month.Example for January month : sum(343423)/31 (31 number of days in January)
When we write this measure using DAX query in Excel we are getting semantic error.Tried sample formula : Average:=SUM([Events])/EOMONTH([EventDate],1)
writing this DAX command for measure.After having this data ready, we are creating PowerBI reports on this data.
Hi all,
I had a problem in a stored proc when I was using table variables in SQL Server 2005. I fixed the problem by changing them to temporary tables. It works now but I really want to understand why I had to do what I did. Here's the situation:
Had a stored proc that cached quite a bit of data (100-200k records with 7 columns) into a table variable. Then, it looped through this and returned a result set. The table this procedure was querying, then caching, was highly transactional. After about 2 or 3 users were hitting the same area at once, the procedure locked. If there were no locks, it executed very fast. However, it usually timed out (due to this locking).
After researching, I see that your usually better off sticking with temp tables for large amounts of data - but the primary explanation I hear for this is that you can index it. However, it also seems that the temp table will perform read-locking as its an actual physical table, whereas the table variable will not. Therefore, because there's no locking and its entirely in memory, the table variable is often the better choice. This is confusing me though because the problem I was experiencing was some sort of locking - which I thought would have been less likely with table variables.
The only other thought I had is that the table variables (if there were several of them existing at once due to several users executing the same procedure), were causing some kind of memory limit to be hit, making the database wait until some more memory became available.
Sorry for the long post, but I'd really like to know if anyone else has had these issues and what the cause might be.
Thanks,
Mike
For example in a table with this fields "field1, L1,L3,L100" field2 the count is 3
it would be better to match a number into the like but i thinks it cannot be done in the like so i've to add another condition to ensure all the text after L is a number.
is this the best way to do it?
Select count(*) from Information_Schema.Columns Where Table_Name = @Table
AND column_name like 'L%' and ISNUMERIC(SUBSTRING(column_name,2, len(column_name)-1))=1
Following is my db table
student_id student_code student_parent_id student_name
1 11 0 a
2 111 1 b
3 1111 2 c
4 11111 3 d
I want to generate following op
student_id student_code student_parent_id student_name Hierarchy
1 11 0 a 11
2 111 1 b 11-111
3 1111 2 c 11-111-1111
4 11111 3 d 11-111-1111-11111
Following is the query
i want to retrieve around 10000 in one go.. its taking around 8 seconds.. how to make it faster?
even if i retrieve 1 record or 10000 records, its taking around 8 seconds...
--- create table
create table test(sid bigint, scode nvarchar(50), parentid bigint, sname nvarchar(50))
---- insert records
insert into test values (1, '11', 0, 'a')
insert into test values (2, '111', 1, 'b')
insert into test values (3, '1111', 2, 'c')
insert into test values (4, '11111', 3, 'd')
---- result query
;WITH SInfo AS
(
SELECTsId
,scode
,ParentId
,sName
,CONVERT(nvarchar(800), scode) AS Hierarchy
[Code] .....
Hi,I have a float column in the database. When ever, I enter a value into the table, the values are rounded. Suppose I execute the following script: create table tblamount( flttotal_amount float)insert into tblamount values (0.00)insert into tblamount values (0.00)insert into tblamount values (0.00)insert into tblamount values (0.00)select * from #tblamount returns the following values:0000 but I want the ouput with the values 0.00 that I entered in the DB. Can u pls help me out with this?
View 2 Replies View RelatedHi,
I hope that someone can help me understand why my query is not returning what I expect. When I run this query:
SELECT DISTINCT(TransactionKey)
FROM Transactions_Fact
WHERE DateKey = 14550
AND TransactionKey BETWEEN 1 AND 90000000
AND TransactionKey NOT IN (SELECT DISTINCT(TransactionKey)
FROM tmpTransactions
WHERE TranDate = 14550
AND TransactionKey BETWEEN 1 AND 90000000)
I get 150 rows back, which is what I expect. However, if I leave out the 'AND TransactionKey BETWEEN 1 AND 90000000', then I don't get back anything?!?
SELECT DISTINCT(TransactionKey)
FROM Transactions_Fact
WHERE DateKey = 14550
AND TransactionKey NOT IN (SELECT DISTINCT(TransactionKey)
FROM tmpTransactions
WHERE TranDate = 14550)
Any ideas as to what I'm missing here? It seems like it should at least return the same 150 rows. Thanks for any help.
Gary Hines
Hello,
I have 3 tables (A, B, C) with milions of records (A ca 5 milions, B and C ca 10 milions).
I have created a join betwenn them
select some fields (A, B, C)
FROM
A as a
JOIN
B as B
on
a.a1 = b.a1
and
a.a2 = b.a2
JOIN
C as c
ON
b.b1 = c.b1
and
b.b2 = c.b2
Where fieldtime <= date/time
But it takes to much time: aftre 2 hours and half is still running.
Do you know how to increase the performance?
Thank
Dear friends,
I'm reading Wiley's Data mining with SQL Server 2005... There are MANY things I can't understand about MovieClick example (Chapter 3).
I hope someone is going to help me with this troubles...
WARNING (1): I'm a dummy both with sql server and data mining.
WARNING (2): My English is not good at all.
Just two questions for now:
1) When I create the model to predict the number of bedrooms for homeowners, the book says to check BEDROOMS as Predictable... question: is it also an INPUT for the model, or PREDICTABLE only?
2) I'd like to keep this model (number of bedrooms.......) and make a prediction query.
- Query builder
- select case table -> Homeowners
- Drag the Customer ID column from the Homeowners table and drop it on the grid
- Drag the BEDROOMS column from the mining model and drop it on the grid.
- On the last row: Source=PredictionFunction, Field=PredictProbability
- Drag the BEDROOMS column from the mining model and drop it into Criteria/Argument
- Add (i.e.) 'Two or Three' to the field Criteria/Argument
I execute the query and I obtain many rows in a table with the following colums: CustomerID, BEDROOMS and Expression: WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?
WHICH INFO DO I GET FROM THOSE NUMBERS? WHAT CAN I LEARN FROM THEM?
Thanx a lot in advance, please help me!
I have date field in table and data contain 2014-08-09 11:13:03.340
when I use smalldatefield I am getting 2014-08-09 11:13:00 I should have got 2014-08-09 11:13:03
Why the 03 is trimming in smalldatefield.
how do I use select query to get 2014-08-09 11:13:03 from original Date records
I have received some data out of a relational database that is incomplete and I need to find where the holes are. Essentially, I have three tables. One table has a primary key of PID. The other two tables have PID as a foreign key. Each table should have at least one instance of every available PID.
I need to find out which ones are in the second and third table that do not show up in the first one,
which ones are in the first and third but not in the second,
and which ones are in the first and second but not in the third.
I've come up with quite a few ways of working it but they all involve multiple union statements (or dumping to temp tables) that are joining back to the original tables and then unioning and sorting the results. It just seems like there should be a clean elegant way to do this.
Here is an example:
create table TBL1(PID int, info1 varchar(10) )
Create table TBL2(TID int,PID int)
Create table TBL3(XID int,PID int)
insert into TBL1
select '1','Someone' union all
select '2','Will ' union all
select '4','Have' union all
select '7','An' union all
select '8','Answer' union all
select '9','ForMe'
insert into TBL2
select '1','1' union all
select '2','1' union all
select '3','8' union all
select '4','2' union all
select '5','3' union all
select '6','3' union all
select '7','5' union all
select '8','9'
insert into TBL3
select '1','10' union all
select '2','10' union all
select '3','8' union all
select '4','6' union all
select '5','7' union all
select '6','3' union all
select '7','5' union all
select '8','9'
I need to find the PID and the table it is missing from. So the results should look like:
PID
MISSING FROM
1
TBL3
2
TBL3
3
TBL1
4
TBL2
4
TBL3
5
TBL1
6
TBL1
6
TBL2
7
TBL2
10
TBL1
10
TBL2
Thanks all.
I currently have a query that uses three tables [Table1, Table2, Table3]. Each table only has two columns: Group and something else. I want a query that gives me the group and those three something else.
Table1: Group and Info1
Table2: Group and Info2
Table3: Group and Info3
Query: Group, Info1, Info2, Info3
The groups never repeat in a single table.
However, the groups are not identical in every table. I want the groups to never repeat twice: All the groups should appear if they are there at least once in one of the table, and provide Info1, Info2, Info3 (blank if it's not there in its table, filled if it is).
That should be a fairly simple query, I just can't seem to make it work so groups don't repeat.
Little visual example.
Table1: Group - Info1
1 - a
2 - b
4 - c
5 - d
Table2: Group - Info2
1- aa
3- bb
4- cc
Table3: Group - Info3
5- aaa
The query would give me this:
1 - a - aa - ""
2 - b - "" - ""
3 - "" - bb - ""
4 - c - cc - ""
5 - d - "" - aaa
I have a large table of customers. I would like to add a column that contains an integer, unique to that customer. The trick is that this file contains many duplicate customers, so I want the duplicates to all have the same number between them.the numbers dont have to be sequential or anything, just like customers having the same one.
View 8 Replies View Related