I'm developing a VB.Net for a CE.NET device. I use SQL Server 2000. I use merge replication to synch with the CE.NET device.
I have this problem where a view is not replicating to the CE.NET but my table articles are replicating without problems. All the base tables for the view are replicating correctly.
Using SQL 2005 as pub and SQL EXPRESS as sub using Merge replication. Got the following error message
The schema script 'CD_InTransit_v_153.sch' could not be propagated to the subscriber. Error Detail: The schema script 'CD_InTransit_v_153.sch' could not be propagated to the subscriber. (Source: MSSQL_REPL, Error number: MSSQL_REPL-2147201001) Get help: http://help/MSSQL_REPL-2147201001 Unable to replicate a view or function because the referenced objects or columns are not present on the Subscriber. (Source: MSSQL_REPL, Error number: MSSQL_REPL20164) Get help: http://help/MSSQL_REPL20164 Invalid object name 'dbo.Debit_v'. (Source: MSSQLServer, Error number: 208) Get help: http://help/208
According to error message, it seems that debit_v is missing. However, I cannot control the sequence of view to replicate. How can I solve this problem
Using SQL 2005 as pub and SQL EXPRESS as sub using Merge replication. Got the following error message
The schema script 'CD_InTransit_v_153.sch' could not be propagated to the subscriber. Error Detail: The schema script 'CD_InTransit_v_153.sch' could not be propagated to the subscriber. (Source: MSSQL_REPL, Error number: MSSQL_REPL-2147201001) Get help: http://help/MSSQL_REPL-2147201001 Unable to replicate a view or function because the referenced objects or columns are not present on the Subscriber. (Source: MSSQL_REPL, Error number: MSSQL_REPL20164) Get help: http://help/MSSQL_REPL20164 Invalid object name 'dbo.Debit_v'. (Source: MSSQLServer, Error number: 208) Get help: http://help/208
According to error message, it seems that debit_v is missing. However, I cannot control the sequence of view to replicate. How can I solve this problem
I have some issue when replicating a view (transactional replication).I have following objects on publisher:
Table: [Metadataschema].[Entity] View: [dbo].[EntityLogicalView] the view definition is:
create view [dbo].[EntityLogicalView] as (SELECT * FROM [Entity] WHERE OverwriteTime = 0)
this is what I get when I run "Script View as Create". The same query is used by the replication.Unfortunately this query fails on the subscriber "Unable to replicate a view or function because the referenced objects or columns are not present on the Subscriber". I cannot even runt his query manually on the subscriber, it only works when I change it like this:create view [dbo].[EntityLogicalView] as (SELECT * FROM [Metadataschema].[Entity] WHERE OverwriteTime = 0) Is there any way to get this working? Can I change the creation scripts used by the replication or force publisher to include schema names in all objects?
Background - I have a publication that propigates schema changes. I have a view in which I want to remove a column.
Error - Going by what the BOL says, I use Alter View and delete the column from my select statement. I issue the alter view command against the Publication database and it just "churns". I do not get any locking errors or any other type of error, but the statement never completes execution. I watched it run for 10 minutes and cancelled the query. Executing the same statement against a copy of the database that is not being published executes in 1, 2 seconds.
Here is what I am doing:
Old View: Select table1.record_number, table1.record_date, table1.status_code, table2.status_desc,
table2.txt_sort_order
FROM table1 join table2 on table1.status_code = table2.status_code
In my production box is running on SQL7.0 with Merge replication and i want add one more table and i want add one more column existing replication table. Any body guide me how to add .This is very urgent Regards Don
There is a view in our replicated SQL-2000 database, that returns all user tables and views with replication state (0 if not included into publication, 1 if included):
Code Snippet
CREATE VIEW [dbo].[ViewREPL_PublishedObjects]
AS
SELECT TOP 100 PERCENT
CASE [xtype]
WHEN 'U' THEN 'Table'
WHEN 'V' THEN 'View'
ELSE NULL END AS [Object Type],
[name] AS [Object Name],
CASE WHEN [replinfo] = 0
THEN 0 ELSE 1
END AS [Replicated]
FROM [sysobjects]
WHERE
[xtype] in ('U', 'V')
AND [status] > 0
ORDER BY
(CASE [xtype]
WHEN 'U' THEN 1
WHEN 'V' THEN 2
ELSE 10
END),
[name]
Now we need to upgrade our database to SQL-2005, but [sysobjects] table have been changed, so neither Replicated state could be determined according on [replinfo] column value, nor User/System object according on [status].
So, I need a view with same functionality, that will work under SQL-2005 and 2008.
Hello everyone,I am involved in a scenario where there is a huge (SQL Server 2005)production database containing tables that are updated multiple timesper second. End-user reports need to be generated against the data inthis database, and so the powers-that-be came to the conclusion that areporting database is necessary in order to offload report processingfrom production; of course, this means that data will have to bereplicated to the reporting database. However, we do not need all ofthe data in the production database, and perhaps a filtering criteriacan be established where only certain rows are replicated over to thereporting database as they're inserted (and possibly updated/deleted).The current though process is that the programmers designing thequeries/reports will know exactly what data they need from productionand be able to modify the replication criteria as needed. For example,programmer A might write a report where the data he needs can beexpressed in a simple replication criteria for table T where column X= "WOOD" and column Y = "MAHOGANY". Programmer B might come along amonth later and write a report whose relies on the same table T wherecolumn X = "METAL" and column Z in (12, 24, 36). Programmer B willhave to modify Programmer A's replication criteria in such a way as toaccomodate both reports, in this case something like "Copy rows fromtable T where (col X = "WOOD" and col Y = "MAHOGANY") or (col X ="METAL" and col Z in (12, 24, 36))". The example I gave is reallytrivial of course but is sufficient to give you an idea of what thecurrent thought-process is.I assume that this is a requirement that many of you may haveencountered in the past and I am wondering what solutions you wereable to come up with. Personally, I believe that the above method isprone to error (in this case the use of triggers to specifyreplication criteria) and I'd much rather use replication services tocopy tables in their entirety. However, this does not seem to be anoption in my case due to the sheer size of certain tables. Is thereanything out there that performs replication based on complexprogrammer defined criteria? Are triggers a viable alternative? Anyalternative out-of-the-box solutions?Any feedback would be appreciated.Regards!Anthony
I have 2 identical tables one contains current settings, the other contains all historical settings.I could create a union view to display the current values from table A and all historical values from table B, butthat would also require a Variable to hold the tblid for both select statements.
Q. Can this be done with one joined or conditional select statement?
DECLARE @tblid int = 501 SELECT 1,2,3,4,'CurrentSetting' FROM TableA ta WHERE tblid = @tblid UNION SELECT 1,2,3,4,'PreviosSetting' FROM Tableb tb WHERE tblid = @tblid
there is a table - TableA in my DB which iam using in a stored procedure now the table is normalised and the same date is spread in 6 diff tables. my admin is creating a View which is just like TableA.
my question is do i have to change anything in my stored procedure as TableA is a view and not a table anymore.
HiComplete newbie to sql server. I have a Companies table from which I wouldlike to create a Clients view as follows;SELECT ID, Company, CompanyTypeFROM dbo.CompaniesWHERE (CompanyType = N'Client')Such that when I insert a record into this view it automatically setsCompany Type to Client. Just so I can treat the view as just another tablewithout having to worry about setting the correct company type. Is there away to do this either via views or some other way?ThanksRegards
If anyone can help... I have a function that takes one parameter andbring back quite a lot of records. but with a conventional function thefield size has a limit of 8000 and i can not use field type 'text'. thelimit has been reached and the view does not bring back results. anoption i found was to use a table function. but with my limitedexperience with table udf's, I am failing to use it within a view. I ampassing a value from the view as a parameter to use in the function andit doesnt work.Please help.*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
I am in a scenario where my tables are refreshed every morning by a batch update. I have built a few views off of one table. To increase speed I would like to take all the rows from one of the view s and insert them into their own table. I know this can be done with some T-SQL but I'm a noob to it and don't know how to specifically do it.Any detailed help would be greatly appreciated. -Nate
I'm designing a database for my final year project at University, and have run into a bit of a dilemma with one of the tables. Basically, it's an equipment loan database where both students and lecturers need to be able to book and borrow equipment. To avoid having two separate bookings tables (i.e. StudentBookings and LecturerBookings) I've got students and lecturers combined into one table called 'Borrowers'. The trouble comes because the clients want the lecturer storing in the booking information table, which can get quite messy because lecturer information is stored in the same table as borrower information meaning that I basically need to relate both the Booking.BorrowerID and Booking.LecturerID to Borrowers.BorrowerID.
In theory, I think this could be solved by creating a View called Lecturers that pulls the required information for Lecturers out of the Borrowers table and then link Booking.LecturerID to the ID of the view. In practice, I've got a couple of queries:
1) Is it possible to perform a JOIN on a view in the way that I would need to here?
2) To keep things nice and clear, is it possible to 'rename' the BorrowerID to LecturerID whilst creating the View?
Sorry if some of this isn't too clear. Please ask any questions to clarify what I mean if you need to.
Normally i can use Web Matrix to connect to a SQL table. e.g. Dim queryString As String = "SELECT [MyTable].* FROM [MyTable]"Is is possible to connect to a SQL View. The reason is because i have generated a view using UNIONS and JOINS and some columns are generated by concatenating columns together (ie.. has alias columns).I also need to use VB.NET to refer to these alias columns.
We have a table created by an application, and a view that joins the table with other tables.
For some reason we are now unable to drop the table or the view. In Enterprise Manager the drop table dialog comes up, we click 'Drop All' and then the hour glass comes up and never goes away. No errors are returned, the process just never returns control to the client, the same when trying to remove the view. Using Query Analyzer is no different.
However stopping and starting the server resolves the problem for a while, but eventually the same problem starts happening. The table is created, populated and dropped using stored procedures called from a web page via asp script. This process may occur numerous times and hasn't been a problem until the last day or so when the developer added a couple of smallint columns to the table.
Hi all, What's different from SELECT FROM A TABLE to SELECT FROM A VIEW? Which is faster? Can anyone explain my result following? Example for: -- TABLE: set statistics io on select * from TABLE_NAME -->Table 'TABLE_NAME'. Scan count 2, logical reads 106, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0
-- VIEW: Create view VIEW_NAME as SELECT * FROM TABLE_NAME set statistics io on select * from VIEW_NAME -->Table 'TABLE_NAME'. Scan count 1, logical reads 53, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0.
Can anyone help me with displaying several table properites at once. I know I can use sp_help 'tablename' to get one at time. What is the best method to get several databases at a time?
I am working on a program for the Pocket PC platform, which will piggy-back on a helpdesk program which stores it data in an SQL server. I have no problems with getting information from the server, or any connectivity issues.
I have found that it is easy to synchronize an access .mdb file, or an ODBC Source to a .cdb file on the PPC. I have a data provider for the SQL database in question, and the "Import Database" function works fine; it pulls up a listing of all the tables and fields in the helpdesk database.
My problem is as follows. The table used to store the memo information is at least 20-30 megs. I only need a few key entries from that table. I also need to make the sync process as simple as possible (that's why i was looking into activesync), but there does not appear to be ANY way to import an SQL View, as opposed to a table.
SQL CE appears to be one possible solution, but we are running SQL 7, and the CE server tools require SQL 2000.
So, is there a way to trick activesync into sync'ing a VIEW instead of a table?
Do you have ANY OTHER ideas, which would be simple come time to sync?
I have a table that has thousands of rows inserted daily (rows are seldom updated or deleted)
The table is also involved in frequent non-simple select statements. It currently has about a million rows.
Out of the 15 odd columns in the table, I can see about 6 that would benefit being indexed to speed up the select statements.
Before I do this, I was wondering if people think that perhaps I should create an indexed view that all select statements use, rather than adding indexes directly to the table.
Can anyone advise me the performance benefits/disadvantages of indexed views over indexed tables?
Have a table with Data and Dependencies(Foreign Keys) and Stored Procedures, views etc. Need the Data in that table to put in different order. For exampl, put older years in the begining or end so when sorted by year, you will get right data. Question is: If i use view it will be based on the table with Wrong entry order and if i use Temporary Table each time stored procedure is run, it will be created and overhead.
Example of the table is below with Wrong order. I should have entered the old years first. Note this is example and not the actual table!
If this example is not right, my bottom line is this: I have entered the Data in a table and i'm getting wrong resutls when i order by Desc or Asc and now either have to delete all rows and re-enter it or have someother clever way!
I am trying to create a view using to three queries below and I get the error message Views or functions are not allowed on temporary tables. Is there a way to do that or is there a way to combine the three queries below so I don't have to use a temp table so I create a view?
--Query 1
SELECT * INTO #MOVEMENTS FROM [GW_DW].[dbo].[DimStatusHistory] d WHERE TransferFromToProgram<>'' AND d.Status=12 ;
I want to create a view from table j25_teamlist2014 with the 7 columns shown below. But I only want the rows which don't have a Status of 'Not Available'.This sql works fine apart from the Team Name and Team Captain columns display the team which is an interger ie Row 1 shows 1 in the Team Name and Team Captain columns instead of 'My Team' and 'Jo Bloggs'.Also when viewing the original table and the new view the structures are slightly different.
CREATE VIEW j25_availableteamlist2014 AS SELECT Team, Day, Time, Lane, Team Name, Team Captain, Status FROM j25_teamlist2014 WHERE Status NOT LIKE 'N%'
MVP's and the likeI am looking for suggestions , confirmationLet me start by saying bar none, performance is paramount with thequeries to be retured off this view/table query.To that end I am completley donormailzing the data into a view (or atable) with all possible legal combinations ( I have seen this refferedto as Croation Method ?) Its ends up at 3 total rows per account onaverage.THis query is to be executed only from the web, so once again theperformance is paramount.Ok here is what I have so far I have a set of related tables 5 or sothat are for the most part 1 to 1 but in the case of one particulartable its an average raqtion of 20 to 1.Broken all out with 150k customer rows it ends up at 500k total rows inthe viewAbout 7 cols are dynamic aggregates (Sum(tran_AMT)) , min(tran_amt) ,etcI had it in a view and with 1/5 million rows (In the view) it performedadequatley, I will most likeley get to somewhere around 10 milliontotal rows (In the view)I looked into indexing it but thats not going to happen because I amdoing several subquery's , outer joins etc.The View with a Select * returns in 40 SecondsNow i ran into an issue with recursing this query into several seperatesubqueries and hit the 256 table limit, after only about 15 recursions.Now the data only gets updated once , perhaps twice a day, in a batchtransaction.So I Put all the data from the view into a table, and indexed that, Ican return all rows in 12 seconds and any refining conditions I throwat it, like Date > 12/1/2003 (then it executes in under 6 second_ onlyslices the query time down big time (A very good thing)Since its only updates 2x a day I drop and recreate the table in my DTS, and I have triggers on the other tables for Online updates (usuallyno more that 100 a day) but to ensure the table is ALWAYS current itgets recreated on import of additional rows.Is there a name to this maddness ? My co-workers aree leary of it butthey come from a dbase background, denomailzing it into a table andthen indexing the table I couldnt be happeier with ther performance.Are there any lurking gremlins in this design ?I cannot see any pitfalls with doing this , or are there some ?,basically I am denomailizing for read-only query performance.They are concerned about the denorilization for performance, eventhough its only on a read only table (was and could be a view I justcant index this particualr view)So I guess Im looking for a , "Sounds OK" or "Sounds Great" from theSQL Gods ....Chris
I have a list of users that I want to restrict access to tables in a database. The goal is to allow the users to use select statements on the views instead of the tables. How can this be accomplished?
