SQL 6.5 And Standard Security
Jun 11, 2002
Hiya all....
I've inherited a SQL 6.5 server running on Windows NT 4.0. An application was written (I believe in VB 6.0) to access tables on the server. From the documentation that I have received, I believe that the Security mode for this server is supposed to be "Standard". When I first got my hands on the server, the security mode was set to "Integrated". I have since changed it "Standard" but the users still get the same error:
Connection failed:
SQL State" '08004'
SQL Server Error: 18450
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server] Login failed. User: MCLEANC Reason: Not Defined as a valid user of a trusted SQL Server connection.
I looked in the Microsoft Knowledgebase and read an article on SQL Server Error 18450 (http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q164167). I followed all of their suggestions but the server still seems to be stuck in "Integrated" mode.
Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Greg
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
May 20, 1999
I have 3 NT Workstations that will not connect to my SMS database using NT Integrated Security. The SQL 6.5 server is set up to use mixed security. The only way to connect to the server is to use a standard sql account. Any ideas? THis happens to all users even administrators.
Thanks in Advance.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 28, 2006
Hello...
I am trying to verify that the ability to use the security extension to use Forms based authentication is available (or not) with SQL 2005 Standard. I have read a few books and articles that state that only the Enterprise edition will allow us to use the security extensions to customize authentication and authorization. But a few recently have told me otherwise.
Does anyone know for sure? We use Standard edition...and would like to customize our security.
thanks
- will
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 17, 2007
I have an app that queries the same SQL Server, instance and database. In one execution of the app, it makes multiple queries against the database in two different runs, each run being approx. 10 seconds apart. The app app does remote logins to the SQL Server using Standard Security. Each run makes twenty (20) connection attempts and all connection attempts between the two runs are using the same SQL account/password€¦(when successful) there is a .5 second delay between each attempt. So, here is a visual description:
Run 1
- connection attempt 1 (.5 sec delay), account1/password
- .
- .
- .
- connection attempt 20, account1/password
(10 second delay)
Run 2
- connection attempt 1 (.5 sec delay) , account1/password
- .
- .
- .
- connection attempt 20, account1/password
The problem I€™m seeing is: All connection attempts in Run 1 are successful in connecting to the SQL Server. All connection attempts in Run 2 are UNSUCCESFFUL when connecting to SQL Server (error message is €œSQL Server cannot be found or Access Denied€?). Remember, ALL connection attempts are using the same SQL account and password.
As an added note: When I switched from using SQL Standard Security to Windows Security, ALL connection attempts in each Run was successful.
Does see anything wrong with this? Is Standard SQL Security limited in the number of simultaneous connections or in some other kind of way?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 12, 2006
We have experienced an issue with back backup / restore of a database originating from SQL Server 2000 to SQL Server 2003.
We have the following setup:
SQL Server 2000
- DatabaseA
- asdfUser (SQL User)
- asdfUser is (dbowner) of DatabaseA
- DatabaseB
- asdfUser (SQL User)
- asdfUser is (dbowner) of DatabaseB
SQL Server 2005 Standard
-asdfUser is NOT Setup as a user yet.
-We restore DatabaseA and DatabaseB to the SQL Server 2005 Standard. The databases are restored with the security permissions of asdfUser being the DB Owner of DatabaseA and DatabaseB.
-We create a new SQL user named asdfUser on the SQL Server 2005 box. We then try to add the UserMapping of DBOWNER for the DatabaseA and DatabaseB. We receive an error message stating that the asdfUser already have permissions to the databases. We proceed with the user creation without those permissions.
-We proceed to the login properties of the asdfuser and view their UserMappings. The asdfUser does not have access to DatabaseA or DatabaseB. We then add the UserMapping of DBOWNER to both DatabaseA and DatabaseB. We Try to select OK and we receive an error message that states that the user already has those permissions.
-When we query the UserID's of the asdfUser that is in the database and the UserID of the asdfUser that is created, they are two different values.
I assume this is a bug... any word on a fix?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 30, 2007
Hi All,
Good Evening.
I need a comparision between Evaluation copy and Standard license version of SQL Server 2005 /SSIS.
I'm assigned a task to evaluate SSIS and migrate a project to SSIS.
I have downloaded SSIS evaluation version and started working on that.
Now i'm being posed questions for the complete functionality of the tool...
- Whether it has a Bulk load trasformation ?
- Whether the evaluation version contain all the features of a standard license version ?
I need to submit a consolidated report for SSIS in comparision to the current ETL tool features.
Can you please let me is there any considerable features not given with a evaluation copy ?
Thanks in advance,
Suresh N
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 2, 2006
How do SQL 2000 service packs play a role in upgrading? That is, can SQL 2000 Standard with no Service Packs(SP) be upgraded to SQL 2005 Standard, or does SQL 2000 Standard have to have a certain service pack??
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 4, 2014
I use from sql server 2008. and c#
what is the best connectionstring?
I don't know if i use Persist Security Info and Integrated Security or not?
And if yes then their value must be true or false?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 14, 2005
Hello there I have trying to figure out for days how to enable FullTrust for my Reporting Services security extension.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jul 31, 2007
Hi,
I have posted this issue for a week, haven't got any reply yet, I posted it again and desperately need your help.
The article http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms365343.aspx says:
Model Item Security can be set for differnt security filters, but when I use SQL Server Management Studio to set Model Item Security, it seems "Permissions" property surpass "Model Item Security" property. -- My report server is using Custom Authentication.
For example, in "Permissions" property of the model, if I checked "Use these roles for each group or user account" without setting any user or group, no matter what users I added to "Model Item Security" with "Secure individual model items independently for this model" checked, NO one user can see the model on report manager and report builder;
in above situation, if I added "user1" and gave role such as "Browser" role to "user1" in "Permissions" property, if I checked "Secure individual model items independently for this model" in "Model Item Security" property, even I did NOT grant "user1" to root model and any entities under the model, the "user1" is able to access the model and all entities in report builder.
My question is on the same report model, how to set "AdminFilter" (empty security filter) for administrator permissions and set "GeneralFilter" (filtered on UserID) for general user based on their UserID?
The article also says:
"Security filters are always applied, even for users who have Content Manager or Administrator permissions to the model. To allow administrators or other users to see all rows of an entity on which row-level security is defined, you can create an empty security filter (which always returns True) and then use the filter to grant those users access to all the rows."
So I defined 2 filters "GeneralFilter" and "AdminFilter" for "Staff" entity for my report model "SSRSModel", I expect after I deployed the report model, the administrator users use report builder to build reports with all rows available, and the non-admin users can only see rows based on their UserID.
I can only get one result at a time but not both:
either the rows are filtered or not filtered at all, no matter how I set the "SecurityFilter" for the entity: I tried setting both "AdminFilter" and "GeneralFilter" for SecurityFilter at the same time, combination of "DefaultSecurityFilter" and "SecurityFilter", or one at a time.
Your help is highly appreciated!
Desperate developer
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 26, 2007
hi i want to know what is the differance between
Persist Security Info=False;Integrated Security=Yes;
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 18, 2015
Is there any possibility to schedule SQL job execution as Windows Security Group? I need to run powershell script through SQL job with one of this group member's permissions.Â
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 6, 2007
I have Sql Server Express installed on Vista (service pack 2)
I have Visual Studio 2005 with an application that I'm trying to access it with within a WCF service.
The login ID of the service is added to the database.
The database has remote access turned on.
The ID is granted access to all databases within the server.
The thread is being set with WindowsProvider and the services set their thread to WindowsProvider.
The dataserver is set with using Windows Authentication for security.
When I open my connection to the database, though, it reports the typically useless message that the connection is not allowed and that the server may not allow remote connections.
How to I get past this? I've done everything right.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 18, 2007
I want to use an Active Directory security group that is a Distribution List for a new role assignment for an existing report. Can someone tell me if this is possible? I get an error each time I try:
The user or group name <DLName> is not recognized. (rsUnknownUserName)"
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 10, 2008
First of all I am planning to install sql 2005 standard and sql standard sp2
on vista ultimate professional using vs 2008 pro
I have some questions about installing sql 2005 what is the best way to install sql 2005 on
vista My article I got this from ms 403393 (upgrading sql standard 2005 to sql standard 2005sp2)
1 sql standard .(shortcut right click from cd/dvd not possible) I have heard command prompt start menu, click cmd
type run D: cd/dvd exe
From a wizard (sql sp2)
2. sql standard sp2
a. upgrade using a wizard
b. open a command prompt (not sure if right click is best option)
install dvd media example dqlserver2005sp2-kb921896-exe SKUUPGRADE=1(is run as administrator option on media)
do I type run or what do I type ?
c. go to system configuration page(where is this) you should see a single warnining you need to install
sp2, the edition should say success if it does not please reapply
d. on the registration page please enter your registeration number
e. on the comments to install please enter database services, reporting services
workstation components, books online and development tools( I wish to install
all components)
f. on the instance page click default instance(default install)
g. finish rest of wizard
h. apply sql sp2
I also have of seperate question of upgrading sql from vista using a Configuring local admin account
account (configuring administration from a wizard-will this notify
me by default) I do not want my administrative priviledges elevated.
I will be using default configurations for my installations.........
I often wish there would a nice picture examples of doing this
Please help
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Is there anybody out there with a MS SQL 2K Security Baseline orSecurity Checklist. Where can I get one????Thanks in advanceDavid
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 28, 2008
Hi;
I am looking for a way to log all security related events for SQL in Windows Security Log. I am trying to use SCOM for monitoring SQL and I am looking at ways to generate alerts in my SCOM Console for specific events in SQL e.g. A table is deleted, user is modified, deleted, etc. Is this possible and if yes how do I achieve the same?
Rgds;
View 6 Replies
View Related
Aug 3, 2006
In an environment where there are many initaitors speaking to a central target with frowarders in between, from what i can understand this best policy is to disable encryption on the endpoints, since dialog encryption will be enforced this is all that is really required, is this correct.
If the endpoints used encryption the message would need to be encrypted and decrypted at each forwarder resulting in slower perfromance, where as dialog encryption would only encrypt at the sender and decrypt at the target, so is this the best way to go?
Secondly is it best practice to open a dialog initally and send messages over this dialog for years never ending the conversation? This way the services only have to authenticate eachother once, if there are no reboots etc that is of course.
I would think performance wise sending each message and ending the conversation each time is a much greater overhead ? So would it be best practice to keep dialogs open and keep sending messages ?
Initally when i was learning service broker i thought that one must send a message and end the dialog until the next message, but i think the other way is the best option ?
Is this correct ?
Thanx
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2007
Hi
I'm designing a distributed application where I will have SQL Server 2005 distributed databases replicating data to my central hub which is again a SQL Server 2005 database using SQL Service Broker. Data will be sent from the central hub to the distributed sites and vice versa. I need to authenticate the communication and also secure the communication by encrypting the messages. Which security shall I use? Where do I configure the type of security being used? What is the difference between transport security Vs dialogue security - Full security model?
Thanks
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 24, 2007
HI,
may i know the sql server 2005 standard cd is equal sql server 2005 standard volumn license cd ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 19, 2000
Hi:
Can anybody tell me the advantage and disadvantage to use NT security for SQL Server 7.0? For a corporation with 400 users, what is your recommendation for the SQL Server security management. Thanks.
Joan
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 30, 2004
What's the better security to use? Currently I'm always registering using the Windows authentication. When I'm trying to register using SQL authentication I always get "Login failed for user 'sa'" error....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 26, 2006
I just want to know which SQL Standard does the SQL Server & Oracle follows?
SQL-86
SQL-89
SQL-92
SQL1999
SQL-2003
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 20, 2002
Does anyone know if it is possible to go from the Enterprise edition of SQL, back to Standard?
In other words, Enterprise Edition is installed, but what we really want is Standard. Is there any way around this, other than uninstalling and reinstalling SQL?
I assume not, but thought I would check...
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 31, 2008
Hi,
I currently use SQL 2005 express advanced. I connect to it from approx 20 pc's simultaneously and all works well. Each "client" connects with the same user, therefore I have one user setup within SQL server and then all client pc's connect to the database with the same user and password. This works well.
Owing to the database file size restriction of 4 gig, I now need to purchase full SQL 2005 Standard.
My question is, if I buy SQL 2005 Standard with 5 CAL (client access licences) does that mean that I can no longer connect my 20 client pc's to the server at the same time, even though I am only actually logging in with 1 user only?
Any help is greatly appreciated as I can't seem to get an answer to this question via microsoft at all, and a 20 user licence of full sql 2005 is beyond my budget.
many thanks
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 30, 2006
Hi,
We are in the midst of developing/upgrading an online store in ASP.net 2.0 that typically gets about 100,000+ hits per week and we are considering MS SQL 2005 Express as its free to use. My question is how will MS SQL 2005 Express support so many concurrent visitors and will MS SQL 2005 Standard / MS SQL 2005 Workgroup be a better option as far as performance?
Thanks,
Kamran
View 10 Replies
View Related
Oct 30, 2007
I'm trying to setup SQL Server 2005 Express to communicate through a non standard port. I can connect to SQLServer on a remote machine using port 1433 when it is set as such but when I change the server to another port and try and connect using SSMSE I can't get through. I'm specifying the ip address and a colon followed by port number to connect.
For example: 123.123.123.123:1234
Any ideas?
----------------------------------
Standing on the shoulders of giants
View 9 Replies
View Related
Nov 15, 2007
All,
I'm new to x64 bit architecture.
Server OS is 2003 R2 EE x64
Sql is 2005 Std sp2 with hotfix
4 way processors
4 GB of RAM
I reading that all x32 configurations do not apply... pae , awe
enabled etc....
after sp_configure ..sql is set to 2gb max memory setting.
Does this not have to be increased for sql to see more
memory .. I've confirmed that OS can see the 4GB but
don't think SQL can.
Does 'AWE enabled' still haveto be set up (or anything else)with this setup to optimize memory.
thanks much
John
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 15, 2007
Hi,Anyone know an online source for database schemas, or schemas for singletables i.e. where can I download a schema for an addresses table?--Richhttp://www.badangling.com -= Sea fishing badly explained =-
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Hi;Is there an **easy** way to tell tsql apart from standard sql?Will sqlserver run scripts written only in standard sql?What about variable definitions?Thanks in advanceSteve
View 8 Replies
View Related
Mar 25, 2008
Is there any way to create a local database cache from an SQL 2005 database that uses non standard schemas (like AdventureWorks). I have tried in Visual Studio 2008 but any database that does not use .dbo will not allow any tables to be copied locally. Even setting the default schema for my login does not enable adding any tables in the Configure Data Synchronization dialog box.
If it is not possible via Visual Studio is there any other way? I notice all examples with Sql Compact conveniently use Northwind. Seemingly Compact edition does not support non .dbo schemas.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 16, 2008
I am reaching the end of my 180 eval of SQL Server and am ready to "upgrade" to the standard edition. My question is this: is it possible to purchase a copy of SQL Server Standard with just 1 CAL? All I seem to see are 5-CAL and 1-Processor packages, but since I am the sole user of the database, additional CALs are not necessary.
Thanks for any suggestions,
Ken
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 12, 2006
dear all,
if one has purchased enterprise edition of sql server, could he install the standard version instead of the enterprise one without violating software license?
regards
View 1 Replies
View Related
