How can I check/count how many connections are made during a requests, how many queries?, how long those queries took etc?
I want to know what's the approach to get this kind of information, so after that I can start working on improving performance.
I am currently working with typed sqlceresultsets. I noticed that each resultset manages its own databaseconnection. I am considering to change this to a situation where I can reuse a databaseconnection on more than one sqlresultset.
Will this result in better performance? for example, when I have 2 updates for wicht I need 2 resultsets, wouldn't it be better to use 1 connection and transaction instead of each resultset creating/disposing its own? I would realy like to hear some oppinions. thanks!
I was told in one of my systems classes that the real performance bottleneck in accessing information from the database was the opening of a connection from the application to the database.
To combat that problem I was advised to use a Singleton Factory pattern and to have that Factory instaniate a connection and open it, then pass references to that connection for all of the objects that it created. All of those objects passed the connection reference to the objects they created and so on. Basically that meant that I only ever had one connection open at any one time for my entire application. And I was able to implement this solution at my previous job where I was developing in Oracle. I primarially used OracleCommands and OracleDataReaders to get the informaton into and out of the database. I thought this was a very nice solution. Having this many DataReaders accessing a single connection was not a problem because OracleConnections don't get locked from having more than one DataReader open at once.
At my current job, however, I use SQL Server. I am concerned that the single connection will not work in my new enviroment as the SQLDataReaders lock up the connection while they are using it. If the information that I recieved about opening connections being the real bottleneck, then I am hesitant to have a connection instanciated and opened for each method, but I am concerned that a whole lot of errors will be generated if I use the single connection method. Also, how do DataAdapters effect my decision of which approach to use.
Any advice would be most helpful. If you have any questions that would help answer just ask. Thanks.
Hi there,
Here we have got a
asp.net application that was developed when database was
sitting on SQL server 6.5. Now client has moved all of their databases
to SQL server 2000. When the database was on 6.5 the previous
development team has used oledb connections all over. As the databases
have been moved to SQL server 2000 now i am in process of changing the
database connection part. As part of the process i have a login
authorization code.
Private Function Authenticate(ByVal username As String, ByVal password As String, ByRef results As NorisSetupLib.AuthorizationResult) As Boolean
Dim conn As IDbConnection = GetConnection()
Try
Dim cmd As IDbCommand = conn.CreateCommand()
Dim sql As String = "EDSConfirmUpdate" '"EDSConfirmUpdate""PswdConfirmation"
'Dim cmd As SqlCommand = New SqlCommand("sql", conn)
cmd.CommandText = sql
cmd.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure
NorisHelpers.DBHelpers.AddParam(cmd, "@logon", username)
NorisHelpers.DBHelpers.AddParam(cmd, "@password", password)
conn.Open()
'Get string for return values
Dim ReturnValue As String = cmd.ExecuteScalar.ToString
'Split string into array
Dim Values() As String = ReturnValue.Split(";~".ToCharArray)
'If the return code is CONTINUE, all is well. Otherwise, collect the
'reason why the result failed and let the user know
If Values(0) = "CONTINUE" Then
Return True
Else
results.Result = Values(0)
'Make sure there is a message being returned
If Values.Length > 1 Then
results.Message = Values(2)
End If
Return False
End If
Catch ex As Exception
Throw ex
Finally
If (Not conn Is Nothing AndAlso conn.State = ConnectionState.Open) Then
conn.Close()
End If
End Try
End Function
''' -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
''' <summary>
''' Getting the Connection from the config file
''' </summary>
''' <returns>A connection object</returns>
''' <remarks>
''' This is the same for all of the data classes.
''' Reads a specific
connection string from the web.config file for the service, creates a
connection object and returns it as an IDbConnection.
''' </remarks>
''' -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Private Function GetConnection() As IDbConnection
'Dim conn As IDbConnection = New System.Data.OleDb.OleDbConnection
Dim conn As IDbConnection = New System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection
conn.ConnectionString = NorisHelpers.DBHelpers.GetConnectionString(NorisHelpers.DBHelpers.COMMON)
Return conn
End Function
in the above GetConnection() method i
have commented out the .net dataprovider for oledb and changed it to
.net dataprovider for SQLconnection. this function works fine. But in
the authenticate method above at the line
Dim ReturnValue As String = cmd.ExecuteScalar.ToString
for some reason its throwing the below error.
Run-time exception thrown : System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException - @password is not a parameter for procedure EDSConfirmUpdate.
If i comment out the
Dim conn As IDbConnection = New System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection
and uncomment the .net oledb provider,
Dim conn As IDbConnection = New System.Data.OleDb.OleDbConnection
then it works fine.
I also have changed the webconfig file as below.
<!--<add
key="Common" value='User ID=**secret**;pwd=**secret**;Data
Source="ESMALLDB2K";Initial Catalog=cj_common;Auto
Translate=True;Persist Security Info=False;Provider="SQLOLEDB.1";'
/>-->
<add key="Common" value='User ID=**secret**;pwd=**secret**;Data Source="ESMALLDB2K";Initial Catalog=cj_common;' />
Please help. Thanks in advance.
Just a quick question about connection management. My application willnever need more than 1 or 2 connections about at any given time. Also, I donot expect many users to be connected at any given time. For efficiency, Iwould like to keep connections alive throughout the lifetime of the objectsrequiring them, rather than opening a new connection, executing code andthen closing it again. What is the most efficient way of doing this?Should I perform the open/close or just one open when I create the objectand a close when I dispose of it?
View 1 Replies View Related1. Use mssql server agent service to take the schedule
2. Use a .NET windows service with timers to call SqlClientConnection
above, which way would be faster and get a better performance?
Hello Everyone,I have a very complex performance issue with our production database.Here's the scenario. We have a production webserver server and adevelopment web server. Both are running SQL Server 2000.I encounted various performance issues with the production server with aparticular query. It would take approximately 22 seconds to return 100rows, thats about 0.22 seconds per row. Note: I ran the query in singleuser mode. So I tested the query on the Development server by taking abackup (.dmp) of the database and moving it onto the dev server. I ranthe same query and found that it ran in less than a second.I took a look at the query execution plan and I found that they we'rethe exact same in both cases.Then I took a look at the various index's, and again I found nodifferences in the table indices.If both databases are identical, I'm assumeing that the issue is relatedto some external hardware issue like: disk space, memory etc. Or couldit be OS software related issues, like service packs, SQL Serverconfiguations etc.Here's what I've done to rule out some obvious hardware issues on theprod server:1. Moved all extraneous files to a secondary harddrive to free up spaceon the primary harddrive. There is 55gb's of free space on the disk.2. Applied SQL Server SP4 service packs3. Defragmented the primary harddrive4. Applied all Windows Server 2003 updatesHere is the prod servers system specs:2x Intel Xeon 2.67GHZTotal Physical Memory 2GB, Available Physical Memory 815MBWindows Server 2003 SE /w SP1Here is the dev serers system specs:2x Intel Xeon 2.80GHz2GB DDR2-SDRAMWindows Server 2003 SE /w SP1I'm not sure what else to do, the query performance is an order ofmagnitude difference and I can't explain it. To me its is a hardware oroperating system related issue.Any Ideas would help me greatly!Thanks,Brian T*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
View 2 Replies View RelatedHello Everyone,I have a very complex performance issue with our production database.Here's the scenario. We have a production webserver server and adevelopment web server. Both are running SQL Server 2000.I encounted various performance issues with the production server witha particular query. It would take approximately 22 seconds to return100 rows, thats about 0.22 seconds per row. Note: I ran the query insingle user mode. So I tested the query on the Development server bytaking a backup (.dmp) of the database and moving it onto the devserver. I ran the same query and found that it ran in less than asecond.I took a look at the query execution plan and I found that they we'rethe exact same in both cases.Then I took a look at the various index's, and again I found nodifferences in the table indices.If both databases are identical, I'm assumeing that the issue isrelated to some external hardware issue like: disk space, memory etc.Or could it be OS software related issues, like service packs, SQLServer configuations etc.Here's what I've done to rule out some obvious hardware issues on theprod server:1. Moved all extraneous files to a secondary harddrive to free up spaceon the primary harddrive. There is 55gb's of free space on the disk.2. Applied SQL Server SP4 service packs3. Defragmented the primary harddrive4. Applied all Windows Server 2003 updatesHere is the prod servers system specs:2x Intel Xeon 2.67GHZTotal Physical Memory 2GB, Available Physical Memory 815MBWindows Server 2003 SE /w SP1Here is the dev serers system specs:2x Intel Xeon 2.80GHz2GB DDR2-SDRAMWindows Server 2003 SE /w SP1I'm not sure what else to do, the query performance is an order ofmagnitude difference and I can't explain it. To me its is a hardware oroperating systemrelated issue.Any Ideas would help me greatly!Thanks,Brian T
View 2 Replies View RelatedHi I have some simple questions of for MS SQL. Say I have a database with a table Called Company. In this table I have Employee's with these columns(EmployeeID<PK>, FirstName, LastName) Now I am inserting some data like this.EmployeeID FirstName, LastName------------------------------------------------------- 1 Bob Smith2 Joe Mitter Now Say I have this situation(this will look weird for this example but for another examples and the stuff I am working on it make sense). Say I have a new Employee Called Jessica White. Jessica must be the second record. So I need to insert it between the 1st and 2nd record. Like I said I am very noob at doing this stuff so I am not sure how I would do it. I first was going to my table and then went to modify. This brought up a blank grid with all my column names. I then started to add all my data in. I found out later to make my life easier I need to enter in certain spots null rows in it to help with formating(otherwise I would have had to figure out a way to do make null rows with c# code). I then went back to this grid and I tried to add a record before the data just like you if you used excel. I quickly found out you can not do that. This resulted me having to recreate the table and reput the all the data back in(this told me I was doing something very very wrong). I was then thinking of writing it with a query and I been playing around with it and still running into problems like say I had a table called test with a coloum called id<PK> and testss(yes bad names just playing around though).So if I did something like this:INSERT INTO testVALUES(2)INSERT INTO testVALUES(1)SELECT * FROM testNow I am trying to figure out how to insert something between rows 1 and 2. Would I have to drop the table or delete all the data and then run a saved copy of my script with the added change or what?My second question is what is a good site that has examples of all the commands(I don't want to read a book on it I have had a oracle sql course and well it was just boring and I did not learn too much.). I think the best way for me to learn is just continue doing my site and picking it up on the file and when I got a problem read about it and ask on the forums. Thanks
View 11 Replies View RelatedVery strange event. Installed new machine into NT 4 network, which has a PDC and a BDC. We have copies of all SQL databases on both the PDC and the BDC. I installed SQL 7 on new workstation. Throught Control Panel/ODBC connections I can reach the SQL files on bith the PDC and BDC. Howver when I try to use Enterprise Manager, I can connect to the tables on the PDC, but not the BDC. SQL lists both machines in the server group, but only allows me to access tables on PDC! Here is the Event information that I recived on the BDC:
The computer IVR1 tried to connect to the server NTBACKUPSERVER using the trust relationship established by the MASSCOM domain. However, the computer lost the correct security identifier (SID) when the domain was reconfigured.
How do I fix this?
HI all,
I have a problem here. I am having two computers both are loaded windows NT 4.0 AND SERVICE PACK 4 AND ALSO I INSTALLED SQL SERVER 7.0.
Now i want to connect those two servers , so pls anyone suggest me how i have to do.I connected both servers thru HUB.
Pls suggest me..
thank u..
--ram
I figure anyone who has done VB and SQL Server might have run into this.
>
> I am set up as a DBO on SQL Server with access to db1 and db2. My default
> is set to db2. From my local machine, I can log through VB(DSN-less) in
> to
> either one without a problem. BUT, if I go to another machine and try to
> log in through VB(DSN-less) to db1, it rejects my login. Here is my
> connect
> string :
>
> UID=xxxxxxx;PWD=pedro;DATABASE=db2;DRIVER={SQL
> Server};SERVER=Athens;DSN=``;
>
> The only thing that changes when I log into db1 is the database parameter-
> "DATABASE=db1".
>
> Am I doing something wrong here? Is there something that needs to be
> setup
> differently in SQL Server? Do I need to put something else into the
> connect
> string?
>
> This happens for the other developers as well, not just me.
>
> Any help would be GREATLY appreciated.
I am looking for some ideas on the following DTS challenge: I need to import the data from an Access 97 database into a set of tables(about 25). The location of the database can be anywhere on the users drive(s) and I will need to get the location of the database from a registry setting and use it to define the connection.
Thanks
We have a case where a user is using Excel sheet to connect the database on SQL2K and generally his connection runs in the upper 150 in numbers. He generally gets more than 150 connections open.
I know that it's not a good thing, but is there a way to limit it or even kill it after it reaches max?
What are the disadvantages of opening too many connections?
I'm getting the classic message "The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool" etc when connecting to my SQL Server 2005 Express from a .Net application.
Then I try connecting, simultaneously, from a simple ASP.net thing I wrote just for testing and this works fine. So, then the connection pool can't be full, can it? Or, does each application have its own pool??
Ok, yeah, I'm being lazy...
Any comments?
Hi
I have heard that SQL Server can support upto 10,000 users,
What if my application , connects to the sql & does not do antything then , why does the SQL server slow down with just 700 users.
I mean just the connection is established & NOTHING further is done.
Thanks
hi,
have been looking for ages for somewhere that might be able to answer my question so thought i'd try here.
anyhows, my place of work have goldmine 6.7 running on a server. the problem is that some of the client machines seem to be taking 2 connections to the server when logged into goldmine and some only 1.
when looking at the open sessions it shows a second for some users accessing pipesqlquery. all users show this but only some show it as a second connection.
please any ideas
Is there any type of performance gain to using DSN connections? Or any real advantage to using them over DSN-Less connections?
--
If I get used to envying others...
Those things about my self I pride will slowly fade away.
-Stellvia
As most of you are aware, when you close a VB.NET connectrion to a SQLserver, the connection doesn't actually drop right then and there.From my tests, using VB.NET 2003 and SQL2K, the connection doesn'ttimeout and drop off for 6 1/2 minutes. How can one force thisconnection to immediately drop off with code?
View 12 Replies View RelatedHiI am a dba for sql server recently we are facing problems with the no ofconnections.we have a database called ( x ) every day almost million users is using thatdatabse after some time the cpu showing 100 percent utilization an errorthrowing like odbc error connection so in that case no one is able to connectto the server.when we pause it then restart the server for some time it looksgood then again it will go to 100 % utilization.but there is no blockingoccuringif anyone knows this problem please helpyour help would be appreciated.Thanks--Message posted via SQLMonster.comhttp://www.sqlmonster.com/Uwe/Forum...eneral/200510/1
View 4 Replies View RelatedHi I would like to know about connections of sa, where SQL store thenumber of connections
View 1 Replies View Relatedim writing a service that will be on a app serverthis is one of many service's to process Recordsets from Sql Server...1 service may have 20 Processes to Completeexamplemain class PreProcess()method CleanNames();method updateNames();methodr ValidateContracts();Various things must be completedSuedo Example belowMy question isin the main class make my connection and keep it for all sub membersor connect in each memberA. This Way opens connection...closes connectmethod cleanNames()1 get connection2 get recordset3. Close Connection4 process Recordset5. Open Connection4 Commit Changes6. Close Connection()finished cleanames()ormethod cleanNames()1 get connection2 get recordset3 process Recordset4 Commit Changes5. Close Connection()finished cleanames()orthis final way is in the parent Class or Calling Functionsends in the connections holds it open till the service iscompleted of all jobs its Suppose to dothen releases the connectionmethod cleanNames(oconn) connection as parameter1 get recordset2 process Recordset3 Commit Changesfinished cleanames()ThanksDaveP
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a c# winapp and use SqlHelper to CRUD operation wint an sql server 2005 database, every time mi data access layer opens an connections, I do Close() and Dispose() after the transaction, and I execute SP_WHO and the database server shows me that my winapp has generated a lot of connections, I dont understand why since i clean every connection, Also, I m not using pooling since my connection string. Has someone has faced this before??
Best Regards
Joseph
I have .net 2.0 framework and SQL V 8.0 on my web server.
I am trying to create a DSN and I am not given the OLEDB provider for SQL as an option for my list of providers. Is there a download that will add this ? What do I do to get it????
Hi everybody,
I need a little help...
I created several packages, that after their creation should not be changed again; that's why I created a Package Configuration File in which I set all the Connections I need, so that this is the only file I have to modify.
I set there also the path of the connections for my log file and for my error files (which are both text files), but if I change their paths in the configuration file this change doesn't affect the package, and the path of the log remains the same.
That's an image of one of those packages....
The fact is that I cannot change the ConnectionString of the connection called "log_pkg", but it always remains the same...
How can I resolve this problem??
Thanks everyone
Hello,
This might not be the right forum, but I'll go ahead and ask anyways -
How does SQL server's per seat/user licensing work ? What I'm hoping to find out is that - if some one has procured a 2 user/seat license - will the number of connections that the two users are allowed to open be limited to 2 ?
Or can the two users open any number (reasonable number) of connections ? I'm asking this in the context of the possibility of having multiple connections service our desktop application. Or am I tied to having a maximum of one connection per client/user by virtue of the licensing restrictions ?
Thanks,
Avinash
Forgive me if this is the wrong forum, but it does have to do with data access. Just a quick question: When using an ADO Component /Object to connect to a database, C# or whatever, that connection that is established - How likely is it that data being retrieved from the database is intercepted, is that channel encrypted/secured, and if not for either questions, how do i secure that channel?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHiI have written the following function public System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader ExcuteReader(string strQuery, string strConnection) { System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand myCommand; System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader myReader; myCommand = new System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand(strQuery, new System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection(strConnection)); myCommand.Connection.Open(); myReader = myCommand.ExecuteReader(); return myReader; }to return a datareader for me but right now I am facing the problem that it seems this function isn't closing the connection by itself which is resulting in an error saying "Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to
obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because
all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached" and if I close it manually I will lose the data in the readerso are there any suggestions of what I should do?thank you
I am getting an error like this
View 5 Replies View RelatedHi.
We have developed as quite simple ASP.Net webpage that fetches a number of information from a SQL 2005 database. We are having some problems though, becuase of a firewall that is beetween the webserver and the SQL server, and I think this is because of bad code from my part. I'm not that experiensed yet, so I'm sure that there is much to learn.
Usualy when I do a query against a SQL database, I do something like this:
Function GO_FormatRecordBy(ByVal intRecordBy As Integer) Dim dbQueryString As String Dim dbCommand As OleDbCommand Dim dbQueryResult As OleDbDataReader dbQueryString = "SELECT Name FROM tblRegistrators WHERE tblRegistratorsID = '" & intRecordBy & "'" dbCommand = New OleDbCommand(dbQueryString, dbConn) dbConn.Open() dbQueryResult = dbCommand.ExecuteReader(CommandBehavior.CloseConnection) dbQueryResult.Read() dbConn.Close() dbCommand = Nothing Return dbQueryResult("Name") End Function
Now, lets say that I have a DataList that I populate with Integer values, and I want to "resolve" the from another table, then i do a function like the one above. I guess that this means that I open and close quite alot of connections against the database server when I have a large tabel. Is there any better way of doing this? Chould one open a database connection globaly in lets say the ASA fil? Whould that be a better aproch?
When I added the CommandBehavior.CloseConnection to the ExecuteReader statment, I noticed that it was a bit faster, and I think there was fewer connections in the database, so maby there is more to the "closing connections" then I usualy do.
Any tips on this?
Best reagrds,Johan Christensson
Hi all, In a select sql statement, I have to query 2 databases from 2 different servers. The only way I found to do this, is to call OPENDATASOURCE like this :<asp:SqlDataSource ID="SqlDataSource1" runat="server" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:bdConnectionString1 %>" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Table1] t1 left join OPENDATASOURCE('SQLOLEDB','Data Source=servername;Initial Catalog=xxx;Persist Security Info=True;User ID=xxx;Password=xxx').dbname.dbo.table2 t2 on t1.id = t2.id"> </asp:SqlDataSource>My question is the following :Is there a way to connect to the second server without using the full server declaration into the sql statement ? For information, the server connection is already declare into my web.config like that :<add name="bdConnectionString2" connectionString="Data Source=servername;Initial Catalog=xxx;Persist Security Info=True;User ID=xxx;Password=xxx" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />so is there a way to use 'bdConnectionString2' directly ?If not, is there a way to connect to the second server without entering informations like User ID and Password ? My problem being that I'm not sure it's safe to send this informations directly from the asp.net page. Thank you
View 4 Replies View RelatedHi, can anyone tell me whats the maximum number of connections you can have to MSDE? Eg, is it enough to host an intranet site for a relativly small business?
View 2 Replies View Related