Dear all,
In SQL Server 2000 , how to get distinct records sort by one
field .
Example
SELECT DISTINCT A FROM tblTEST ORBER BY B
Here, In Table
Field 'A' contain more than one same data...
Field 'B' contain all are different Data......
I want distince in Field 'A' and order by Field 'B'..... how to get
it.........
regards
krishnan
I need to run a SELECT DISTINCT query acrossmultiple fields, but I need to add another field that is NON-DISTINCTto my record set.Here is my query:SELECT DISTINCT lastname, firstname, middleinitial, address1,address2, city, state, zip, age, genderFROM gpresultsWHERE age>='18' and serviceline not in ('4TH','4E','4W')and financialclass not in ('Z','X') and age not in('1','2','3','4','5','6','7','8','9','0')and (CAST (ADMITDATE AS DATETIME) >= DATEDIFF(day, 60, GETDATE()))ORDER BY zipThis query runs perfect. No problems whatsoever. However, I need toalso include another field called "admitdate" that should be treatedas NON-DISTINCT. How do I add this in to the query?I've tried this but doesn't work:SELECT admitdateFROM (SELECT DISTINCT lastname, firstname, middleinitial, address1,address2, city, state, zip, age, gender from gpresults)WHERE age>='18' and serviceline not in ('4TH','4E','4W')and financialclass not in ('Z','X') and age not in('1','2','3','4','5','6','7','8','9','0')and (CAST (ADMITDATE AS DATETIME) >= DATEDIFF(day, 60, GETDATE()))ORDER BY zipThis has to be simple but I do not know the syntax to accomplishthis.Thanks
View 2 Replies View RelatedIt gives me this error:
ORDER BY clause (TimeStamp) conflicts with Distinct
The sql statement is:
sql Code:
Original
- sql Code
SELECT DISTINCT division from table order by Stamp DESC
SELECT DISTINCT division FROM TABLE ORDER BY Stamp DESC
I've tried:
sql Code:
Original
- sql Code
SELECT DISTINCT division, Stamp FROM table ORDER BY Stamp DESC
SELECT DISTINCT division, Stamp FROM TABLE ORDER BY Stamp DESC
But this produces duplicate rows, which in this specific case is unacceptable.
Is there any way I can acheive what I want?
Stamp is a TimeStamp if you couldn't figure it out. I just want the last one entered, but all the last ones entered per division. . .
I have a strange situation (I think). Within a view (which explains why I use the top 100% --> to use an order by) I have this query:
select TOP 100 PERCENT *
from tbOfferDetails
where ofd_id = ofd_parent and ofd_fk_off_id = 100
This gives me the following results:
ofd_fk_off_id off_fk_class_id
100 2753
100 2753
100 2071
100 2753
Now I change the query to:
select distinct ofd_fk_off_id, ofd_fk_class_id from
(select TOP 100 PERCENT *
from tbOfferDetails
where ofd_id = ofd_parent and ofd_fk_off_id = 100
order by ofd_sequence ASC ) as tbOffers
This gives me the following results:
ofd_fk_off_id off_fk_class_id
100 2071
100 2753
In the execution plan, it says that a distinct order by is used on off_fk_class_id. My question is: why is this done? I want only a distinct and not an order by. So is there a way to change this (default?) behaviour.
Hi
I have a query which returns some rows.. what happens if i use a select distinct instead of a select.. this is my sproc
DECLARE @Counter TABLE(
PlanId int,
FundId int,
ClientFundName varchar(110),
DisplayOrder int IDENTITY(1,1),
IsDefault bit,
IsPortfolioFundOnly bit
)
INSERT INTO @Counter
(
PlanId,
FundId,
ClientFundName,
IsDefault,
IsPortfolioFundOnly
)
SELECT
5923,
f.FundId,
d.FundName,
CASE WHEN d.FundDefault IS NULL THEN 0 ELSE 1 END,
CASE WHEN Lower(p.FundType) = 'modfundonly' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END
FROM
PlanDetail d
INNER JOIN Statements..Fund f
ON d.CUSIP = f.CUSIP
OR
d.Ticker = f.Ticker
OR
d.Ticker = f.ClientFundId
OR
d.CUSIP = f.ClientFundId
-- Do an internal join on the PlanDetail table to get the value of the FundType to derive whether
--fund can only be chosen as part of a portfolio.
LEFT JOIN PlanDetail p
ON d.FundName = p.FundName
AND
d.PortfolioName = p.PortfolioName
WHERE
d.PlanNumber IS NOT NULL
AND
p.PortFundPercent IS NULL
GROUP BY
f.FundId,
d.FundName,
d.FundDefault,
--d.PlanNumber,
--d.Cusip,
-- d.Ticker,
--d.RowNumber,
p.FundType
ORDER BY
Min(d.PlanNumber),
Min(d.RowNumber)
any help will be appreciated.
Thanks
Karen
I get the "ORDER BY items must appear in the select list if SELECT DISTINCT is specified.
SELECT DISTINCT
pdm.Account,
pdm.Customer
FROM
dbo.Demands pdm LEFT OUTER JOIN
dbo.Tickets rct ON pdm.Account = rct.Account
WHERE
pdm.Code IN (66, 51)
ORDER BY
pdm.TransactionDate DESC
Is there any way to make the ORDER BY work in this case?
Hello,
I have a stored procedure with dynamic ORDER BY. I would like to use the DISTINCT too. Is it somehow possible?
Thank you
Here is the stored procedure:
SELECT identifier_company + cast(identifier_number as nvarchar(3)) as identifier,
CASE WHEN canceled = 'True' THEN 'canceledPO' ELSE '' END AS style,
staff.staff_name,
purchase.purchase_id,
purchase.traveller_name,
nominal_department.department_name,
purchase.canceled,
purchase.travel_date,
convert(nvarchar(20), purchase.date_raised, 103) as dated,
supplier
FROM purchase INNER JOIN purchase_project ON purchase.purchase_id = purchase_project.purchase_id
INNER JOIN staff ON purchase.raised = staff.staff_id
INNER JOIN nominal_department ON purchase.department = nominal_department.nominal_dep_id
WHERE (raised in (SELECT staff_id FROM staff WHERE department like @FromDepartment) or purchase.raised = @raisedBy)
and purchase_project.project_number like '%' + @Query + '%'
ORDER BY
CASE @SortDir
WHEN 'ASC' THEN
CASE @OrderBy
WHEN 'staff_name' THEN cast(staff_name as nvarchar(100))
WHEN 'traveller_name' THEN cast(traveller_name as nvarchar(100))
WHEN 'department_name' THEN cast(department_name as nvarchar(100))
WHEN 'supplier' THEN cast(supplier as nvarchar(100))
WHEN 'canceled' THEN cast(canceled as nvarchar(10))
END
END
ASC,
CASE @SortDir
WHEN 'DESC' THEN
CASE @OrderBy
WHEN 'staff_name' THEN cast(staff_name as nvarchar(100))
WHEN 'traveller_name' THEN cast(traveller_name as nvarchar(100))
WHEN 'department_name' THEN cast(department_name as nvarchar(100))
WHEN 'supplier' THEN cast(supplier as nvarchar(100))
WHEN 'canceled' THEN cast(canceled as nvarchar(10))
END
END
DESC
OK I am trying the following select statement but I am getting a 'DISTINCT requires ORDER BY to be used' error. I have an ORDER BY in it so I am not sure what I have missed?
SELECT DISTINCT tbl_final_CP.ExtEnum + tbl_final_CP.ExtEnum AS [Full Cost]
FROM tbl_final_CP INNER JOIN
ContractorAreaRelationship ON tbl_final_CP.Area = ContractorAreaRelationship.AreaNo INNER JOIN
tbl_CPCost ON tbl_final_CP.CP = tbl_CPCost.CP
WHERE (DATEPART(yyyy, tbl_final_CP.dCount) = DATEPART(yyyy, GETDATE())) AND (ContractorAreaRelationship.ContractorNumber = 6112) AND
(DATENAME(mm, tbl_final_CP.dCount) = 'Conwy') AND (ContractorAreaRelationship.AreaName = 'Conwy') AND (tbl_final_CP.Video > 0) OR
(DATEPART(yyyy, tbl_final_CP.dCount) = DATEPART(yyyy, GETDATE())) AND (ContractorAreaRelationship.ContractorNumber = 6112) AND
(DATENAME(mm, tbl_final_CP.dCount) = 'March') AND (ContractorAreaRelationship.AreaName = 'Conwy') AND (tbl_final_CP.ExtEnum > 0) OR
(DATEPART(yyyy, tbl_final_CP.dCount) = DATEPART(yyyy, GETDATE())) AND (DATENAME(mm, tbl_final_CP.dCount) = 'March') AND
(ContractorAreaRelationship.AreaName = 'Conwy') AND (tbl_final_CP.Video > 0) AND (ContractorAreaRelationship.AdminID = 6112) OR
(DATEPART(yyyy, tbl_final_CP.dCount) = DATEPART(yyyy, GETDATE())) AND (DATENAME(mm, tbl_final_CP.dCount) = 'March') AND
(ContractorAreaRelationship.AreaName = 'Conwy') AND (tbl_final_CP.ExtEnum > 0) AND (ContractorAreaRelationship.AdminID = 6112)
ORDER BY tbl_final_CP.CP, tbl_final_CP.ExtEnum + tbl_final_CP.ExtEnum
I am trying to display items from a table that have a type. For each condition there are between 7 and 10 types. I am looping through each type and displaying all items in that type. I am using DISTINCT to pull the types and count them, so I know how many there are and how times to loop. My problem is that DISTINCT is ordering the types alphabetically! I want them in the same order they went into the table. I tried adding ORDER BY primaryID, but got an error that said I also had to select primaryID as well as type, so now I am selecting every item that fits the condition and not just the DISTINCT types! Is there any way to make it order by column_position? I am using SQL 2K.
View 9 Replies View RelatedSay I have a result set with two fields numbers and letters.
1 A3 A1 B2 B
The result set is ordered by the letters column. How can I select the distinct numbers from the result set but maintain the current order? When I tryselect distinct Number from MyResultSet
it will reorder the new result set by the Number field and return
123
However, I'd like maintain the Letter order and return
132
I have the following records,
MyDate MyId
2003/10/25 2
2003/10/26 3
2003/10/26 1
2003/10/27 3
2003/10/28 2
2003/10/29 4
I want to get the most earlier date distinct records.
I try to use "SELECT DISTINCT MyID from Table;"
I expect to get Myid: 2,3,1,4
But the computer returns Myid:1,2,3,4
Is there a way to get the records using
"SELECT DISTINCT MyID from Table ORDER BY MyDate;"
Appreciate help......
This query demonstrates a problem I have run across:
USE AdventureWorks
GO
-- This query works fine.
SELECT DISTINCT FirstName AS Name1 FROM Person.Contact ORDER BY FirstName
GO
-- This query also works fine.
SELECT ISNULL(FirstName, '') AS Name1 FROM Person.Contact ORDER BY FirstName
GO
-- This query returns error 145
SELECT DISTINCT ISNULL(FirstName, '') AS Name1 FROM Person.Contact ORDER BY FirstName
GO
The last query returns the error "ORDER BY items must appear in the select list if SELECT DISTINCT is specified".
It will work if I change ORDER BY to use "Name1" instead of "FirstName", but in the situation I have at hand, the query is generated by third-party software and I don't have the ability to change it.
Can anyone explain why what's going on here? Oddly, this same query will work if I run it against SQL Server 2000.
Hi,
MSSQL 2000 T-SQL
I have a problem in extracting information pertaing to a key value and matching that key value to another transaction but the order is based on another value in the same row.
I've attached a sample of DB data below.
tran_nr ret_ref_no msg_type description
5111 12345 420 reversal
5112 12345 200 auths
5113 15236 200 auths
5114 46587 200 auths
5115 46587 420 reversal
Requirement using the above data is to extract data where the ret_ref_no is the same for more than one row but also check that the msg_type 420 happens before the 200. Is there a way of retrieving the information in this way using the tran_nr coloumn values? The tran_nr values is basically the serial number when the transaction is wrriten away to the DB.
I've managed only to retrive the 1st half of my query whereby the same ret_ref_nr is being used by more then one transaction. Still need to figure out the 2nd part where the msg_type of 420 happens before the 200.
SELECT * FROM SAMPLE
WHERE ret_ref_no in
(
SELECT ret_ref_no FROM SAMPLE
GROUP BY ret_ref_no HAVING COUNT(*) > 1
)
Results of query
5111 12345 420 reversal
5112 12345 200 auths
5114 46587 200 auths
5115 46587 420 reversal
If someone could assist with only retreiving the above results in bold to the query analyser i will really appreciate it.
Regards
Deceptive
Hi,
I wonder if its possible to perform a ORDER BY clause in an SELECT DISTINCT sql query whereby the AS SINGLECOLUMN is used. At present I am recieving error: ORDER BY items must appear in the select list if SELECT DISTINCT is specified. My guess is that I cant perform the Order By clauses because it cant find the columns individually. It is essentail I get this to work somehow...
Can anyone help? Thanks in advance
Gemma
i need to write a query and can't get it to work no matter how it try. Here's what i need:
T1
-------
a1
a2
datetime
a4
a5
.....
i need distinct max between a1&a2 which i can get no problem but i cant get that unique datetime that correspond to a1&a2 in 1 query because this is will a subquery in a big query. Creating another temp table etc is not an option for me.for every specific a1 there is many entries of a2 + timedate etc.
Code:
T1
-----------------------------
a1 a2 timedate
1 1 2014-04-31 10:59:38.000 ......
1 2 2014-04-31 10:59:39.000 .......
1 3 2014-04-31 10:59:39.500 .......
2 1 timedate .......
2 2 timedate .......etc
select distinct t1.a1
,max (t1.a2)
from t1
Hello, I want to do a DISTINCT SELECT query with more than one field, for example a ID field with a Type field, as if both fields make the primary key, like (ID 1 ,Type 1) ,( ID 1, Type 2) and (ID 2, Type 1) is ok but not (ID 1, Type1) and (ID 1,Type 1) if its not possible to do a distinct with more than one then what other techniques are possible to get the duplicate data out. the reason why I want to use distinct is that I can use that query to export that data to where both of these fields make the primary key.
Thanks in advance
I have a db that contains a column named DSCODES. Values in DSCODES are seperated by a comma.
If I run the following command.
select distinct(DSCODES) from DB
The following is returned.
S100,S102,S103
S100,S103,S105
What I would like returned is the following
S100
S102
S103
S105
Is this possible?
Thank you in advance
Graham
I have a table in my MS SQL 2000 database called News which has a field caled NewsDate. This is a standard Date field which stores the info in this format: 3/1/2001.
I want to create a query that returns one row for each year that there is a story.
For example, if I had this data...
3/1/2001, 6/27/2003. 9/17/2003, 1/1/2006, 4/5/2006
the query would return this result:
2001
2003
2006
This is the query I've started with:
SELECT DISTINCT NewsDate FROM News ORDER BY NewsDate DESC
What modifier can I apply to the NewsDate field to extract JUST the year from the table? If this were ASP I would try something like Year(Date), but, of course, I can't do that here.
Is this even possible? I've been looking up date functions, but haven't found anything that will work in a select statement. ANY and ALL advice will be greatly appreciated.
from this, circdate being a datetime field:SQLQuery = "select distinct circdate from circdata order by circdate"I need the distinct date portion excluding the time part.this has come about when I discoveredI am inserting and updating some datetime values with the same value,but for some reason, the values are always off by a few seconds. I seta variable called SetNow assigned to NOW and then set the datetimefields to this SetNow variable. Then when I collect the distinct datetime I am assuming they will have the same values recorded incircdate, but no, they are off by several seconds. Makes no sense to meat all. I tried renaming the variable several times but it makes nodifference at all.any help appreciated, thanks.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI need to get all distinct values from 10 different tables that exist in the field [favoritesport] And each table holds close to 50K records so I am looking at 500,000 records to get distinct values for. Would the fastest, less intrusive way of achieving this be to just create a UNION ALL so run
Select Distinct([favoritesport]) from table1
Union
Select Distinct([favoritesport]) from table2
Union
Select Distinct([favoritesport]) from table3
etc etc etc
Does ORDER BY work on character data type in SQL Server through ODBC?
I tried using the SQL Query Tool in SQL Enterprise Manager and it works but using through ODBC I can't get any results.
Query: SELECT company_id, company_name FROM lt_company ORDER BY company_name
company_id = integer
company_name = 30 characters
In my SQL 2005 database table Records, I have 3 fields, field1, field2, and field3 which are all nvarchar(50) fields. The value of field2 is something like this, MDB006-MD002-0004-3-2007. I would like to order this field but only use the 0004-3-2007 part of the field to order it. Is it possible to put the last 11 charachters (0004-3-2007) in another field and then order it using this new field?
View 8 Replies View RelatedHow can I "Order By" the second + third characters of a 7 char field ?
Sample data looks like:
LCA - L
LCB - L
LCF - M
LCE - M
LCE - A
LCA - A
LCB - A
If I order by the whole field I get:
LCA - A
LCA - L
LCB - A
LCB - L
LCE - A
LCE - M
LCF - L
LCF - M
What I want is:
LCA - L
LCB - L
LCF - L
LCA - A
LCB - A
LCE - A
LCE - M
LCF - M
I'm still at the stage in this project were I can 'split' the field (if I have to) into first 3 and last 1. But the sort order of the last 1 is not alphabetic (I want 'L', 'A', "M").
Can I substitute a custom SortOrder some way ? (I've done that with mainframe Cobol).
All suggestions appreciated.
Thanks
Roger
Hi group,
I've got a table with two columns named [Year] and [Month]. They are both defined as VarChar.
Question:
Is it possible to ORDER THEM as if they where of type DateTime?
EG
select [year], [month]
from tbl_WeightedAverageGenerated
where [Year] = 2006
ORDER BY [Month]
Returns:
2006, 10
2006, 11
2006, 12
2006, 5
2006, 6
etc...
I need it to return:
2006 5
2006 6
2006 7
2006 8
2006 9
2006 10
2006 11
2006 12
Is this possible....and how??
TIA
Regards,
SDerix
Hi,
I have small question regarding ORDER BY clause.
I wanted some value of the fields should come first before other values….Something like:
+----------+----------------------------------------+
| code | name |
+----------+----------------------------------------+
| UK | United Kingdom |
| US | United States |
| AF | Afghanistan |
| AL | Albania |
| DZ | Algeria |
| AS | American Samoa |
I want to display country UK and US code first and then rest of the countries using SQL statement. I know in MySQL, I can use ORDER BY code IN (...)
--SQL
SELECT * FROM countries ORDER by code IN ('UK', 'US') desc
But not sure how can I do same thing in SQL Server. Is there any equivalent of ORDER BY [field] IN (…) clause in SQL Server???
Though I can create a new field something like sequence and use it to display these countries but I can not do that…
Please advice.
Thanks,
Firoz Ansari
Hi, I've created a website usiing asp.net and all the data are stored in sql front. All the item are sorted in ascending order except one record. The correct order should be MP61, MP100, MP200, but this record is retrieved as MP100, MP200, MP61. If the coding is wrong, all the order displayed is not in ascending order. We have hundreds of items, but why it happens to this particular record? Can anyone help? Thanks in advance
View 3 Replies View RelatedHi,
How can I rearrange the fields in a table in SQL 7? If it is possible, will the existing data be lost?
Thank you for any help.
Newbie question. Can someone show me an SQL statement that sorts the results of a query by a field in a different table?
CREATE TABLE `Table1`
(
`table1_id` INTEGER AUTO_INCREMENT ,
`table1_name` VARCHAR(255),
PRIMARY KEY (`table1_id`)
)
CREATE TABLE `Table2`
(
`table2_id` INTEGER AUTO_INCREMENT ,
`table2_name` VARCHAR(255),
`table2_table1` INTEGER,
PRIMARY KEY (`table2_id`)
)
ALTER TABLE `Table2` ADD FOREIGN KEY (`table2_table1`) REFERENCES `Table1`(`table1_id`);
What I'd like is something like:
SELECT * FROM Table2 ORDER BY "Table1(table2_table1).tabel1_name",table2_name
It's the section in double quotes that I can't figure out how to compose.
As an example, if Table 1 has
1, A
2, B
3, C
and Table 2 has
1, a, 2
2, b, 1
3, c, 2
then I'd like the sort to return
2, b, 1
1, a, 2
3, c, 2
TIA,
Stephen
Hi AllI am finding unexpected results when inserted into a newly createdtable that has a field of datatype int identity (1,1).Basically the order I sort on when inserting into the table is notreflected in the order of the values from the identity field.Have I been wrong in assuming that it should reflect the order from thesort?The code is ...create table tmp (A varchar(50), L float, C int identity(1,1))insert into tmp (A, L) select Aa, Ll from tmp1 order by Aa, Lland I don't understand why the values in tmp.C aren't in the ordersuggested by the sort.Any comments most appreciatedBevan
View 13 Replies View RelatedHi Guys,
Does anyone knows what is the evaluation order for expressions attached to "Value" property and "BackgroundColor" property for a field.
My problem is if a field is being changed in its value property to a particular value, will this changed value be recognised immediately by the Backgroundcolor property during its rule evaluation, it does not seem to be the case.
Hi there
We have a web application (database) that uses one field called Application and another called TicketType.
When a user fills out a ticket they can choose up to 3 levels of this field.
Eg Application, Application2, Application3
Eg TicketType, TicketType2, TicketType3
The extra two levels not being compulsory.
I am using sql server 2005 // Reporting Services
My query is as below:
SELECT Ticket.TicketNumber, Ticket.CreatedDate, Application_2.ApplicationName AS Application, Application_1.ApplicationName AS [App 2],
Application.ApplicationName AS [App 3], TicketType_2.TicketTypeName AS Tickettype, TicketType_1.TicketTypeName AS [Type 2],
TicketType.TicketTypeName AS [Type 3], Ticket.Description, Company.CompanyName
FROM Ticket INNER JOIN
TicketType AS TicketType ON Ticket.TicketTypeID = TicketType.TicketTypeID LEFT OUTER JOIN
TicketType AS TicketType_1 ON TicketType.ParentTicketTypeID = TicketType_1.TicketTypeID LEFT OUTER JOIN
TicketType AS TicketType_2 ON TicketType_1.ParentTicketTypeID = TicketType_2.TicketTypeID INNER JOIN
Application AS Application ON Ticket.ApplicationID = Application.ApplicationID INNER JOIN
Company ON Application.CompanyID = Company.CompanyID FULL OUTER JOIN
Application AS Application_1 ON Application.ParentApplicationID = Application_1.ApplicationID FULL OUTER JOIN
Application AS Application_2 ON Application_1.ParentApplicationID = Application_2.ApplicationID
WHERE (Ticket.CreatedDate >= @StartDate)
ORDER BY Ticket.TicketNumber
End result looks like this:
Application
App 2
App 3
TicketType
Type 2
Type 3
Software
Internal Apps
proACT
SW Other
Office Issues
General
Application
Click Track server
Alert (App)
Service
Network
Other
Network Fault
Software
Internal Apps
Other
User Account
New
Hardware
Network
HW Fault
Application
Click Track server
Alert (App)
Disk space
Office Issues
General
proACT
Configuration
Deployment
Software
Server Software
SharePoint
SW Fault
App Failure (Function)
Software
Server Software
SharePoint
SW Fault
App Failure (Function)
Ultimately I would like the Application (TicketType) fields to have the Master Information in it and the other two fields populated in order as well.
Can someone help please.
Please ask if I haven't explained myself.
thanks
Dianne
I am creating an app that allows the user to change the order of the list by changing a value in a displayOrder field. I'd love a button for move up /move down move bottom/move top and then pass that parameter to a stored procedure and it would renumber all the items in the list.
Example
ItemID description DisplayOrder Action0 item 1 0 Moveup/move down1 item 2 1 Moveup/move down2 item 3 2 Moveup/move down
So clicking on move up on item 2 would pass and itemID, Action and perhaps a list id to a stored proc and it would renumber the list. I'm assuming it would be done with a loop but I've never tried that.. suggestions?
Thanks - Mark
I am trying to order by the field and direction as provided by input parameters @COLTOSORTBY and @DIR while using a CTE and assigning Row_Number, but am running into syntax errors.
Say I have a table called myTable with columns col1,col2,col3,
Here's what I'm trying to do
with myCTE AS
(
Select
col1
,col2
,col3
,row_number() over (order by
case when(@DIR = 'ASC') then
case when @COLTOSORTBY='col1' then col1 asc
when @COLTOSORTBY='col2' then col2 asc
else col3 asc
end
else
case when @COLTOSORTBY='col1' then col1 desc
when @COLTOSORTBY='col2' then col2 desc
else col3 desc
end
end
from myTable
)
Please let me know what i can do with minimal code repetition and achive my goal of dynamically sorting column and direction. I do not want to use dynamic SQL under any circumstance.
Thanks.