Hello,
I am designing a program for work with SQL Server express 2005. But I don't know what is the data storage limit in this version of SQL Server.
What i want is storing about 30000 records in a table of the database.
Hasn't SQL Server express 2005 any problem or restrictions for storing the data?
Please advice in this regards,
Thank you,
Mona
Question:
Can the SQL 2005 express edition can be installed on a machine that has more than 1 GB memory?
If so, is the SQL 2005 express edition will be using memory upto 1 GB?
Hi,
I have a question to do..
can I install sql server 2005 express edition on a windows storage server 2003 R2????
Thank-you!!
MTV
In the latest issue of MSDN Journal , article "IIS 7.0: Enhance Your Apps Wioth Integrated ASP.NET Pipeline", Mike Volodarsky says:
"...Be sure to close the tool after you are finished as SQL Server Express Edition allows only one user identity to access the database at a time."
Can someone elaborate on this?
Hello,
Does anyone know of a reg hack we can use to temporarily increase the size of the sql express limitation of 4 GB?
thanks, ken
What is the number of users that can access SQL Server Experss 2005 Advanced edition. Would like to know before I travel down the road of using it.
TIA
Hi,
I'm trying to learn some VB programming with the VB 2005 Express Absolute Beginner Series video tutorials (which I think is great) and have come across a problem that I can't solve.
When I follow the instructions in Lesson 9 (Databinding Data to User Interface Controls) my application will display the data from the database correctly and I can edit it (and as long as the debugger is running the data remains changed). However, the changes won't propagate back to the database. I don't get any error messages but after I edit the data, save (with the save button on the BindingNavigator toolbar), and end debugging the data in my database remains unchanged. When I use a MessageBox to show how many rows where edited/updated in the
Me.myTableTableAdapter.Update(Me.myDatabaseDataSet.myTable)
I get the correct number back. I'm sure the problem is not due to coding errors since I've also tried running the accompanying Lesson 9 project file that can be downloaded from MSDN and the problem persists.
I'm using Windows XP SP2, SQL Server 2005 Express Edition and VB 2005 Express Edition. I've tried installing SQL Server 2005 Express with a number of different settings, including default settings, but it doesn't make any difference.
Would greatly appreciate any feedback on this as I'm keen to resolve this problem so I can get on with the next tutorial lesson.
Thanks,
Ieyasu
This problem only occurs after deployment, not when debugging. In the table I am having a problem with I have an ID field designated as the primary key with the identity increment set to 1 and the identity seed set to 1. There is no data in the table when deployed. I can add records to the datagridview control but when I try updating the dataset I get this error indicating that the ID field already has a value of 1 present. If I close the application and re-start it, the exception no longer occurrs when I update the dataset. I am including the code to update the tables incase something is wrong there. Any suggestions?
Private Sub UpdateMemberTable()
Me.Validate()
Me.TblMembersBindingSource.EndEdit()
Me.TblMembersTableAdapter.Update(Me.ChurchFamilyDataSet.tblMembers)
Me.TblMemberDependentsBindingSource.EndEdit()
Me.TblMemberDependentsTableAdapter.Update(Me.ChurchFamilyDataSet.tblMemberDependents)
Me.TblMemberContributionsBindingSource.EndEdit()
Me.TblMemberContributionsTableAdapter.Update(Me.ChurchFamilyDataSet.tblMemberContributions)
End Sub
If I install SQL 2005 Standard on Windows 2003 Standard, is SQL limited to 4 gigs of physical RAM?
I'm planning a new system that will run SQL 2005 Standard edition on a Windows 2003 Standard platform. The spec calls for 8 GB of RAM. My experience would lead me to suspect I need to install Windows 2003 Enterprise to take advantage of all the installed memory.
Hello everybody,
Can someone tell me if there are any limitation in SQL Server Agent of SQL Server 2005?
I have a Windows 2003 Enterprise R2 with 16GB RAM and SQL Server 2005. However my SQL Agent log say:
"Message
[310] 4 processor(s) and 4096 MB RAM detected"
Any KB related?
thanks a lot
I've searched the forums and found posts stating that there is no connection governer in the 2005 edition, but I am getting connection limitation errors. I have Standard Edition with 25 CALs.
------
A problem occurred when attempting to contact the server (Server returned: Connection reset). Please ensure that the server parameters passed to the driver are correct and that the server is running. Also ensure that the maximum number of connections have not been exceeded for this server.
-----
How can this be?
Thanks!
HI Everyone,
I understand that there is a 4GB size limitation on SQL Server Express edition. right?
What I want to know is what if a database file created in SQL Express is hosted with SQL Server 2005 will the file still have the 4 GB size limitations?
Thanks
I have developped a package that loads a flat text file into DB.
Runs OK from SQL BI Studio.
When I run it from SQL IIS, I have the following error message
"Erreur, le niveau de produit est insuffisant pour composant <<file IN>>"
that let me think this FLATTEXT ConnectionManager is only in SQL 2005 Enterprise version?
Can you help?
Just to be clear, I would like to know if a problem I face is due to an error on my part or a limitation on Microsoft's. In my experience (several hours-long installations, removals, reinstallations, using the skuupgrade=1 parameter from the command line, ad nauseum) I have concluded that the best one can do installing SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition from the Visual Studio 2005 Professional Edition package is to get the Express Edition, (actually styled MSSMLBIZ). In particular, what I'm hoping to be able to do is program to a test database that I have from my client, which I was able to do on my XP Professional machine. But on my new Vista Ultimate 64 bit machine (which will only let me install the x64 version of SQL Server 2005), I get an instance that is characterized as SQL Server Express and generates the following error message when I try to attach to the same MDF file to which I was able to attach under my prior, XP-Pro based configuration:
TITLE: Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio
------------------------------
Attach database failed for Server 'ZAPHOD42MSSMLBIZ'. (Microsoft.SqlServer.Smo)
For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&ProdVer=9.00.3042.00&EvtSrc=Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Smo.ExceptionTemplates.FailedOperationExceptionText&EvtID=Attach+database+Server&LinkId=20476
------------------------------
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch. (Microsoft.SqlServer.ConnectionInfo)
------------------------------
CREATE DATABASE or ALTER DATABASE failed because the resulting cumulative database size would exceed your licensed limit of 4096 MB per database. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 1827)
For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&ProdVer=09.00.3054&EvtSrc=MSSQLServer&EvtID=1827&LinkId=20476
------------------------------
BUTTONS:
OK
------------------------------
===================================================================================
The following is the Help obtained when clicking on the button on the error msg and the references in the error msg:
===================================================================================
Details
ID: Attach database Server
Source: Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Smo.ExceptionTemplates.FailedOperationExceptionText
We're sorry
There is no additional information about this issue in the Error and Event Log Messages or Knowledge Base databases at this time. You can use the links in the Support area to determine whether any additional information might be available elsewhere.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you for searching on this message; your search helps us identify those areas for which we need to provide more information.
Currently there are no Microsoft Knowledge Base articles available for this specific error or event message. For information about other support options you can use to find answers online, see http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx.
==================
Details
ID: 1827
Source: MSSQLServer
We're sorry
There is no additional information about this issue in the Error and Event Log Messages or Knowledge Base databases at this time. You can use the links in the Support area to determine whether any additional information might be available elsewhere.
Thank you for searching on this message; your search helps us identify those areas for which we need to provide more information.
==========End of reproduction of error messages and help text ====================================
The Developer Edition, of course, is supposed to enable us to program to all levels of the database, and I would hate to think it is really crippled in this way, but after uninstalling everything, reinstalling multiple times (devoting several days to the process), it sure beats me how I can overcome this problem short of going back to my old machine. Any definitive answers on this apparent limitation, or useful procedural advice on installation quirks, would be appreciated (and, yes, I've spent a lot of time going through the installation/setup forum -- if the answer is there I can't find it).
I have a laptop and a desktop that I both installed VWD and SQL Express. from my laptop, i see my laptop's name in the Server Name under data connections, but on the desktop, I only see an older Win2K Server with SQL 2000 in the list. Anyone know why my desktop doesn't show it's NAME?I can create new tables, users and all that stuff from the Management area. Thanks
View 3 Replies View RelatedHello,
Say that I have 100,000 attributes/feature selections for my SQL Server Neural Network Algorithm.
Customer Attr1 Attr2 Attr3 ..... Atr100000
==============================
Jack 1 0 1 ..... 1
Sam 0 1 1 ...... 0
Mary 1 1 0 ...... 1
Knowing the fact I can't fit those info on a table and SQL Server's Neural Network does not support table prediction . What's an alternative to use Neural Network in SQL Server 2005 to solve my problem?
Please assist!
Mary
How to implement distinct storage tiers on SQL Remote BLOB Storage (RBS)?
I want to use this SQL Feature to move files(images, videos, pdf files) from a database to a distinct database dedicated to RBS. Then I want to have several storage tiers, where objects will be saved and moved according access frequency. Old data will be arquived in cheap storage, but it must be always accessible if needed.
Description:
- 1st and main tier: new and frequently accessed objects stored in high performance storage;
- 2nd tier: automatically move older or less accessed objects to an inexpensive and different storage tier;
- in all cases, all objects must be accessible to all users, but accessing to archived objects(2nd tier) will be much slower;
Hi,
I have created one Linked server to fetch the data from Oracle server.
I have two tables at Oracle server
1. EMP_Tbl1 (Emp_Cd VARCHAR2(10))
2. EMP_Tbl2 (EMP_ID NUMBER, Emp_Cd VARCHAR2(10))
I can connect to EMP_Tbl1 table through my linked server at SQL Server 2005.
WHILE I cann't connect to EMP_tbl2.
ERROR:
The OLE DB provider "OraOLEDB.Oracle" for linked server "Linked_Facets" supplied inconsistent metadata for a column. The column "EMPID" (compile-time ordinal 1) of object ""SYSTEM"."EMP_ASH"" was reported to have a "DBTYPE" of 5 at compile time and 130 at run time.
OR "The OLE DB provider "OraOLEDB.Oracle" for linked server "Linked_Facets" supplied invalid metadata for column "JOINING_DATE". The data type is not supported."
Reason:
EXECsp_addlinkedserver
@server='Linked_Facets'
,@srvproduct='ORACLE'
,@provider='OraOLEDB.Oracle'--'OraOLEDB.Oracle'
,@datasrc='ameri.corp.ads.valuelabs.net'
I am using 'OraOLEDB.Oracle' as the provider. This has its own limitations. How to conquer this?
Does sql server 2012 support varbinary data type for replication (Merge or transaction)?
And if so, is there a limitation of data size?
I've never worked with the XML data type in SQL Server, although I know its been there for a few iterations of SQL SErver. Now I've got a situation in which it might store some configuration data as XML, since that's the way it comes. (We had thought about storing the data in a VARCHAR(MAX) field.)
The first question is does the XML data type have a size limitation? For example do you do something like:
ConfigFile XML(1000) NULL
Or is it just something like this:
ConfigFile XML NULL
The second question is persisting the data to a file. As the name I choose for the variable suggests, we want to save the data from a configuration file into a SQL Server database. How do we go about doing that? We'll be developing a C# application, it will read and write the data both from the SQL table and the user's local HD.
Hi,
i want to know how many data can storage into sql server compact edition. I've got a db into a pocket pc that has a table with about 2000 records inside; are they too records?
Hi Friends,
I am Gokul, I am using SQL Server MSEE 2005 (Free ware). Currently I am involved in the development of an application where I am using SQL Server MSEE 2005 and VB.Net. My incomming data size ranges from 5 GB to 7 GB per day. Can I use SQL Server MSEE 2005 as Data base with any licensing or have to get any license for storing larger capacity data.
Can any body please help me.
Thanks,
Gokul.G
hi all,
I have a field which name is Information
and it type is Varchar (8000),but some time data access than 8000 character, my client told me,make this field to store Unlimited data.
So how can i achive this task, i m using VS 2003 (ASP.NET with VB.NET) with SQL 2000.
Thanks
Shally
Hi All,As per BOL, XML data type can store up 2 GB of data.My question is when a row is inserted in a table, for its xml column,2GB of space will be resered.In other words, how xml is internally stored. Is storage allocation issimilar to varchar(max) data type?Thanks in advance for everything.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am planning on doing database mirroring using two (2) servers for each instance and a SAN to store the data and log files for both the primary server and mirrored server. How do I arrange the SAN 4 Physical Drives?
My options are:
· 2 Raid 1 Mirrors giving 250 GB to each SQL engine €“ This though has both the transaction logs and data on the same physical drive even if we split it up further into logical drives
· A Raid 10 - The transaction logs and data can be on separate drives
· A Raid 5 using the 4 Drives. (How SQL will see these drives I€™m not sure when it€™s 2 SQL engines)
· Or I could get a 5th drive and have a mirror set for transaction logs and a RAID 5 configured for the data.
Here are my planning details:
RAID 1:
2 disks RAID 1 for OS and BINS
2 disks RAID 1 for Backups.
RAID 10
4 disks RAID 10 for data
4 disks RAID 10 for log
4 disks RAID 10 for TEMPDB
Should i put the master and other system database on RAID 10 along with TempDB.
Or what else a guru fellow will advise in above setup.
thanks,
Dear All
I have a situation where I installed SQL Server 2005 64 bit on a server, where database files are stored on storage media 'Sun StorEdge 3320 Storage'
I am facing deadlock problems, and slow performance, though they do not appear on my test environement (64-bit, server with no storage)
I need a method to track and find out the source of the problem, could be storage media compatibility, SQL Server or any other issue
Please find below specifications of the storage media used;
Sun StorEdge 3320 Storage
3.1.3.1 SE 3320: Technical Specifications
Model Sun StoreEdge 3320.
Manufacturer Sun Microsystems
Country of Origin Sun-certified factories in America€™s/ EEC/ Far East.
Manufacturing
Standards
UL, FCC, IEC, EN, ISO, etc.
Kindly refer to technical brochures provided for detailed numbers of
above standards.
Operating systems supported
Sun Solaris Operating Environments 8, 9, 10, SPARC Platform Edition
Solaris 10 operating system, x86 Platform Edition
Red Hat Linux AS 3.0
Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server and Windows 2003 Server
IBM AIX 5.1
HP-UX 11i
Novell Netware 5.1 and 6.5
SUSE LINUX Enterprise Server 9.0, (32-bit and 64-bit) Proposed Configuration
Expansion
Expandable Up to 3.6TB per enclosure and Up to 68.4TB of raw capacity per rack cabinet.
Supported drives are 73GB 10Krpm, 146GB 10Krpm, 300GB 10Krpm, 73GB 15Krpm, and 146GB
15Krpm and is expandable to support up to two 2RU expansion trays (36 drives total).
Proposed Configuration
Proposed with 365GB (5x 73GB Ultra 320 SCSI HDD)
Interface
STS AlertONE Technical & Financial proposal €“ Mobilecom
STS_Tech_Mobilecom_AlertOnet v 5 0.doc Page 38 of 73
CONFIDENTIAL© Copyright STS (2006) Stamp / Signature
320MB SCSI LVD
Ports and Controllers
Upgradeable to dual (mirrored) RAID controllers
All configurations have 2 Host ports
Management Software
All needed Management Software is included such as Sun StorEdge Configuration Service; and Sun
StorEdge Diagnostic Reporter software
Power and Cooling
Dual hot-swap, redundant, load-sharing power supplies with dual independent AC inputs
Hot-swap, redundant electrically-isolated redundant cooling fans
RAID Level Support
RAID 0, 1, 0+1, 3, 5, 3+0, and 5+0
LUN€™s
Up to 128 LUN€™s with LUN Masking [Security]
Server Controllers
2 x UltraSCSI adapters are proposed one for each server.
appreciate any feedback
thanks
Hello, So, here's my dumb question; if I wanted to store some *.gif images in some database (SQL2K possibly 2K5) field and wanted to pull the information from that to display on the web form, am I actually storing the image in the database or am I storing the location of the image in the database?I ask this because I was under the impression that the location to the image file is what was being stored but another person was saying that it was the actual image. I guess I'm confused... Thanks in advance....
View 4 Replies View Relatedre: [Windows 2000 SP1, SQL Server 7.0 SP2]
I am developing an online web-based address book for multiple users. There are STANDARD FIELDS and CUSTOM FIELDS.
Standard fields include: Name,Street,City,State,Zip.
Custom fields are those defined by a specific user. For example:
User-A Custom fields:
Interest Rate <real>
Loan Amount <currency>
Start date <date>
User-B Custom fields:
Blood type <char 3>
Date of birth <date>
Referred by <varchar 50>
Different users can have different custom fields in their address book. As you can see, while the standard fields for each user can be
stored in a single table. However, I have several methods by which I can store the CUSTOM fields.
------------------------------------------------
Method 1: Create 2 separate tables called CustomField and CustomValue:
CustomField has fields:
FieldID <int>
FieldName <varchar 25>
UserID <int>
CustomValue has fields:
ValueID <int>
Value <varchar 50>
FieldID <int>
------------------------------------------------
Method 2: Create a separate Field and multiple Value tables for each data type:
CustomField, CustomCharValue, CustomIntValue, CustomMoneyValue, etc...
CustomField has fields:
FieldID <int>
FieldName <varchar 25>
FieldType <smallint> (determines which TABLE, below, contains the data)
UserID <int>
CustomCharValue
CharValueID <int>
IntValue <Varchar 50>
FieldID <int>
CustomIntValue
IntValueID <int>
IntValue <int>
FieldID <int>
etc....etc...
The structures of those tables would be similar to Method 1, but the data would be segregated based on their data type.
--------------------------------------------------
I'm thinking that while Method 1 will be easier to implement, Method 2 may offer me better performance if coded correctly. I'm going
to assume that I'll have at least 1-5 million records to work with over the course of my first year and I will need the ability to sort
records based on values in the custom fields as well.
My first question is: Which method should I be considering and is there an alternative or hybrid that I should be considering?
My second question is: What statements should I use in my stored procedure that will enable me to retrieve a list of USERID, CustomFieldIDs and their values as one resulting table that I can query at will and with solid performance?
Gregory
email: sqlGuy@clubtel.com
1> How is the data stored physically when there is now primary key as well as any index defined in the table......?
2> How is the data stored physically when there is just a primary key defined in one of the column of the table? No INDEX defined.
Thanks,
Rahul Jha
I trying to fully understand when to use different data types in sql server.I want to know what Microdoft means when they say"Varchar is the actual length of the data entered plus 2 bytes".example e.g. what would the storage of varchar (50) be?
View 7 Replies View RelatedHello there,
Don't know if this is the right forum to be asking this, but I'll give it a try...
I'm relativelly a beginner in SQL Server and T-SQL in general. The problem I'm trying to solve is the following:
The big picture is that I have data coming from different data sources which I need to store on a database for later reference. Each data source might have a different set of measurements. For example, data source 1 might log Pressure and Humidity while data source 2 logs Pressure and Temperature. Once the data is present on the DB, the users can go ahead and retrieve data for a given [datasource/measurement/time interval] to generate reports or charts.
My implementation so far consists of two tables: series_info and series_data. series_info holds general information for a given series of measurements for a given data source (Pressure for data source 1, Pressure for data source 2, Humidity for data source 1 and Temperature for data source 2, in our example). Each series has a bigint index as primary key.
The table series_data contains all data relative to the series from series_info. Each piece of data has a bigint as a primary key, an associate time (which is always crescent) and a foreign key to the series it represents (in series_info).
Alright, everything is cool so far. However, whenever a user wants to retrieve data for given [data source/measurement/time interval], this takes very long, since all data is interposed in series_data and for every search it's necessary to find where the desired data actually lies.
One obvious solution for this would be to dynamically create a new table to hold the data for each series, but that would just make my database disorganized, since there would be thousands and thousands of tables.
Another thing that comes to my mind is to create a table with information of where lies the data for a given [data source / measurement] for given dates. So when the user requested data for a given [data source/measurement] between, say, january and february, we would first look at this intermediate table and find out that the data lies between indexes 1000 and 2000 on the series_data table, so the next SELECT command to series_data would already contain a restriction like WHERE index>=1000 and index<=2000. This should probably improve the speed of retrieval.
What do you guys (or girls) think? Maybe there's simply a classical solution for such a case.
Thanks in advance!
Using shared folder in windows mobile 5 emulator, it is not possible to create a database (sqlserver mobile 2005) in the emulated storage card.
The error "sql mobile made an unsupported request to the host operating system. Minor Err 25133 is raised. Reading or writing file from/to the emulated storage card occurs without error.
Is this a bug of SqlCeEngine?
thank you
vincenzo