SQL Server 200 Developer Vs Enterprise Versions
Aug 11, 2006
I am having some problems in the process of moving an Access back-end
to an SQL Server back-end. Everything works but there are severe
problems of response times when the number of users builds up.
At present we are using the Developer version before committing to the
Enterprise version. BOL (quoted below) seems to suggest that, apart
from licensing, they are the same.
Can anyone please confirm that this is so. If not, what is the
difference?
I may explain in another topic the problems I am facing but I first
wish to be clear on this particular question.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from BOL
Microsoft® SQL Server™ 2000 is available in these editions:
SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition
Used as a production database server. Supports all features available
in SQL Server 2000, and scales to the performance levels required to
support the largest Web sites and enterprise online transaction
processing (OLTP) and data warehousing systems.
SQL Server 2000 Developer Edition
Used by programmers developing applications that use SQL Server 2000 as
their data store. Although the Developer Edition supports all the
features of the Enterprise Edition that allow developers to write and
test applications that can use the features, the Developer Edition is
licensed for use only as a development and test system, not a
production server.
View 5 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jul 8, 2007
Hi, I am going to get a new laptop and was wondering in particular which versions of Windows Vista will run SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition. I want to be able to use all the features of SQL Server 2005, so IIS is needed for example ( I will be building end to end BI soutions using SQL Server Management Studio, SSIS, Analysis Services and Reporting Services.
Chris
View 13 Replies
View Related
Apr 26, 2006
Hi,
I would like to know what are the differences between these versions:
SQL Svr Enterprise Edtn 2005 Win32 English MVL
SQL Svr Enterprise Edtn 2005 Win32 English MVL 1 Processor License
SQL Svr Enterprise Edtn Win32 English Lic/SA Pack MVL
SQL Svr Enterprise Edtn Win32 English Lic/SA Pack MVL 1 Processor License
SQL Svr Enterprise Edtn Win32 English Lic/SA Pack MVL Comp Promo
SQL Svr Enterprise Edtn Win32 English SA MVL
SQL Svr Enterprise Edtn Win32 English SA MVL 1 Processor License
SQL Svr Enterprise Edtn Win32 English SA Step Up MVL
SQL Svr Enterprise Edtn Win32 English SA Step Up MVL 1 Processor License
Regards
Ayzan
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 11, 2006
hello we want to evaluate TS foundation server but it says it won't support developer edition sql, only sql2k5 stanard. But now we have DEVELOPER version on our development sql server, DEVDATA1, i.e. instances DEVDATA1DEV, and DEVDATA1QA are both installed on the same sql server box with both SP1 applied.
How can we update DEVDATA1QA to Standard version while still have SP1 applied? we just install Standard CD and then apply SP1 again?
Because this instance is our QA version, before we do something silly, if any of you did that before, any advice would be really helpful.
thanks in advance.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 4, 2004
How can I install SQL Server 2000 Developer edition from the CD's of Visual Studio.Net 2000 Enterprise Architect ?
When I install VS.Net Enterprise Architect I do not see any install option for SQL Server 2000 Developer, though the MSDE option does appear during the installation. However, I was not interested in MSDE.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 5, 2007
I am currently using SQL Server Enterprise Evaluation which runs out after 6months. When this happens or even sooner I plan to install SQL Server Developer.
My questions is can I copy all the things I develop (databases, cubes, reports,) from enterprise evaluation & import/load them into SQL Developer with no problems? Will everything integrate? Is there any implications?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 30, 2007
I am wondering if it is possible to change from SQL Server Enterprise Evaluation Version to Developer Version. The reason is because the Enterprise Evaluation version expires after 180 days. So if I create reports and cubes in Enterprise Evaluation I can import them into Developer Edition right? Should I remove the Enterprise Evaluation version after 180 days or leave it then install Developer Edition?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 20, 2008
We have an existing installation of SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition (64bit) that we are ready to go live with and would like to change the edition to Enterprise Edition (64bit). We have purchased all the appropriate licenses. We would like to avoid UN-installing the Developer Edition and RE-installing the Enterprise Edition. There must be some way to change a registry key, provide your serial number via a command line utility or re-run the setup with the license key provided and direct it to just change the edition from Developer to Enterprise and not change any of the other settings like service account, sa account, collation, etc. Any help is most appreciated.
Thank you,
Matt
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 9, 2007
Hi,
We have 2005 Standard Edition in our production environment and 2005 Developer Edition in dev. Recently we started using a feature in dev only to realize it was an Enterprise specific feature when we wanted to move it to prod. Is there any way to turn off the enterprise features in developer edition so it behaves just like standard edition?
Thanks
Charlie
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 17, 2007
I just installed SQl 2005 Developer Edition, and don't see an Enterprise Manager icon. Only Configuration Tool icons were installed.
Is this all SQL 2005 Developer is, or shoudl I be seeing an Enterprise Manager?
Thanks for your response,
Nate Terry
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 22, 2007
If I run the same FOR XML query in a Development edition enviornment and a Enterprise Edition environment, the results are different. The query is exactly the same.
Here is the query:
DECLARE @MessageBody XML
DECLARE @AuditTable SYSNAME
DECLARE @SendTrans BIT
DECLARE @SendAudit BIT
DECLARE @RecordCount INT
DECLARE @OperationType CHAR(1)
SET @RecordCount = @@ROWCOUNT
SET @OperationType = 'U'
SET @SendTrans = 1
SET @SendAudit = 1
SET @AuditTable = 'States'
SELECT @MessageBody = (
SELECT * FROM
(
SELECT TOP 10
'INSERTED' AS ActionType, @SendTrans AS SendTrans, @SendAudit AS SendAudit,
COLUMNS_UPDATED() AS ColumnsUpdated, GETDATE() AS AuditDate,
@AuditTable AS AuditTable, 'test' AS UserName, @RecordCount AS RecordCount, *
FROM l_states
)AuditRecord
FOR XML AUTO, ROOT('AuditTable'), BINARY BASE64)
SELECT @MessageBody
In my DEV env (Developer Edition), this result is produced:
<AuditTable>
<AuditRecord ActionType="INSERTED" SendTrans="1" SendAudit="1" AuditDate="2007-06-22T15:43:12.497" AuditTable="States" UserName="test" RecordCount="1" StateAbbreviation="AK" State="Alaska" />
<AuditRecord ActionType="INSERTED" SendTrans="1" SendAudit="1" AuditDate="2007-06-22T15:43:12.497" AuditTable="States" UserName="test" RecordCount="1" StateAbbreviation="AL" State="Alabama" />
</AuditTable>
In my Enterprise Edition evn, this is the result:
<AuditTable>
<AuditRecord ActionType="INSERTED" SendTrans="1" SendAudit="1" AuditDate="2007-06-22T15:44:48.230" AuditTable="States" UserName="test" RecordCount="1">
<l_states StateAbbreviation="AK" State="Alaska" />
<l_states StateAbbreviation="AL" State="Alabama" />
</AuditRecord>
</AuditTable>
Does anyone have any idea what might be wrong? Any help is greatly appreciated.
Tim
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 8, 2008
Is it possible to connect SSRS running on SQL Server 2005 enterprise edition (our production system) to a database running on SQL Server 2005 Developer's edition (our test system)
thanks!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 24, 2007
There are conflicting postings everywhere about this. I built a small site using VWD and SQL Server Express, but need to convert to Sql Server 2005 Developer because the DB will exceed 4Gb. Tried to install and could not connect or use from VWD. Tried to uninstall, got into large mess with the byzantine uninstall process, and have now started with a clean machine.
I installed SQL Server 2005 Developer first, then installed VWD Express 2008 without installing SQL Server Express. VWD won't let me connect to an existing database, won't let me add a new database and doesn't even show the Database Tools option under the Tools menu.
Is there someone with specific knowledge that can provide any enlightenment? Would be much appreciated.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 1, 2005
I tried to install this on the same box and I'm not sure how to reply to setup questions since I want to keep my SQL Server 2000 intact.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 20, 2006
We are migration few database from SQL 2000 Enterprise Server to the SQL 2005 Enterprise Server (64 bit-Itanium Server)
Problem :
- The performance difference observer was not much (Just 15-18%)
- The CPU Utilization goes to 100% immediately, when the software login screen appears and it sustains in between 90% to 100%
- Multi-User Access (3 or more concurrent users), the sql performance is tremendously slow.
Steps followed for Migration:
- We have used the backup and restore method to migrate the data from SQL 2000 Enterprise Server to the SQL 2005 Enterprise Server (64 bit-Itanium Server).
- We ran the DBCC DBREINDEX for each affected tables
- We executed the sp_updatestats procedure for all the tables
- Upgraded the DB compatibility version to 90
- Installed the SQL 2005 Enterprise Server (64 bit-Itanium Server) Service pack 2.
One thing that we observed, was the memory usage, on SQL 2000 the sqlservr.exe uses around 1.5 GB where as on the SQL 2005 its just 120 MB.
A normal select query on 2000 Server took 11-12 sec, having 10 lac records, and the same query on 2005 took 1 min (3-5 sec CPU process taken by sqlservr and rest by the Sever Management Studio.
The only differance noted was that on 2000 the entire data was displayed at one go where as in 2005 the data was displayed at the 1st sec, and was filling the rest in the buffer, and to finally display entire data it took 1 min.
Also
when we run this query
select * from sys.dm_os_sys_info
one column os_priority_class shows a value = 32 ? what does this means.
In the MSSQLSERVER SERVICES, properties, there is a parameter displaying value
Advanced > Running Under 64 bit OS = No ? what does this means.
Could anyone pls suggest as to how to increase the sqlservr.exe memory area, and also how the enhance the performance.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 23, 2005
Hi all...
I'm a MySQL user and I want to switch to MS SQL Server, I heared that there is more than one type of MS SQL Server and one or two can be downloaded for free. Can someone tell me the different types of MS SQL Server and where can I download those free versions?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 25, 2007
Hi,
Our server has SQL Server 2003 installed, I'd like to use SQL Server Express 2005 as I'm about to try and learn ASP.NET and most tutorials use that.
Will installing Express 2005 conflict with the Server 2003? Can both version be run on one server?
Thanks.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2006
Is it possible to run both SQL200 standard and SQL2005 Express on thesame server? I need to test a database created in 2005 on ourproduction server but don't want to upgrade our "live" databases yet.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 28, 2008
Hi
If i develop a web application with sql server developement edition, it works fine in my webserver, or my webserver has to have the sql server development too?
I'm interested in sql server report services. if i develop a web application with this tool what kind of version of sql server has to be installed in my webserver?
Thank you
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 13, 2002
I know this is a very basic question for all of you but I need help.
I am a CPA working with a client to select an accounting & project management software for a construction client. In the top 5 choices, there are 2 that require MS SQL Server as the DB. This client will have about 10-20 users, including project managers & accounting personnel but by DB standards transaction volumes will be low. The company has a few large projects. There is no inhouse IT staff; network administration is outsourced.
The question on the table is this? How much more difficult is it to use MS SQL server in this environment? If all of the client's requirements can be met using a run-time version of Sybase, Pervasive, or FoxPro, isn't this the simplest solution. I don't want to recommend an elephant if it is not needed. I would appreciate your opinion....Thanks
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Hello,We are trying to set up replication between different versions of SQLServer (7 & 2000).This is how the 2 servers are now setup:DB1 - External web-server w/SQL Server 7DB2 - Internal server w/SQL Server 2000REPLICATION SETUPThis is how we need the replication to be set up. They are allTransactional Replications.DISTRIBUTION:This is set up on DB2, which is running on 2000WITH PUBLISHERS ON DB1, AND PULL SUBSCRIPTIONS ON DB2:dbo.Employment_App & dbo.Employ_Jobs (together in one replication)dbo.FeedbackNOTE: This set of replications work some of the time, but make DB1 &DB2 very slow when running. A lot of times, the jobs say "RetryingJob", but they usually will eventually work.WITH PUBLISHERS AND PUSH SUBSCRIPTIONS ON DB2:dbo.Jobsdbo.Releasesdbo.SearchNOTE: This set of replications used to work when DB1 & DB2 both ran onSQL Server 7 with 2000 Enterprise Manager's. But since we moved thedata to an internal server (DB2) that runs on 2000, it doesn't work atall.We've researched the problem, and found an article by MS called"Replication Between Different Versions of SQL Server" athttp://msdn.microsoft.com/library/d...plimpl_4joy.aspthat states that this setup should be possible (on Combination 3 forTransactional Replications).But it's not working at all. Are there some steps that we need tocheck to have replication setup between 2 servers running on differentversions of SQL Server (7 & 2000)? Any & all help & advice isappreciated. Thanks.KWilliams
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Hello,I've got installed Win 2003 SBS Premium with the SQL Server 2000 on a servermachine. It works almost fine, except the application which uses the SQLServer. The main part of the application runs (since the last update) fine,but other tools of that application (database import and the databasemanager for check and rebuild) doesn't. They hang up or kill the database.Our software developer says that these problems are in correlation with theserver os. But there won't be any problem if we install Win 2000 Server andadd an additional SQL Server 2000.Finally my question is: Are there any differences between the SQL Server2000 Versions, which are sold (a) as a single product, (b) as part of theWin 2003 SBS Premium package and (c) as part of other Server versions?Thanks in Advance,Martin
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jun 22, 2006
Do you find that there is a big difference between the different
versions of SQL server (6.5, 7, 2000, 2005) as is between Microsoft
programming languages (VB.4, VB5, VB6, .Net and now .Net 2)
Or is the difference in SQL server minimal and very small compared to the programming languages I mentioned.
Thanks a lot
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 4, 2007
I am looking at combining / consolidating some of our servers and was wondering if I can install SQL 2000 and SQL 2005 in a clustered Environment on a san.
Cheers
Angie
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 4, 2006
Can someone here confirm or deny that Visual Web Developer 2005 Express Edition doesn't work with SQL Server Developer Edition 2005?
I
was about to order SQL Server Developer Edition 2005 on Amazon, to use
with Visual Web Developer 2005 Express, when I read a user comment that
the two are incompatible with each other. Does anyone know for sure if
that is true?
What I'm wanting to do is develop an ASP.NET web
application on a web host using a SQL Server database. I use VS2003 and SQL
Server Enterprise 2000 at work, but I'd like to learn the 2005 editions
for this side project. I don't own any of the developer tools/IDEs
personally, so I'm trying to find the most affordable way to do this
for my home business.
Thanks for any advice,
Keith
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 24, 2006
Hi there,
I have one publicacion on ms sql 2005 Enterprise w.sp1/MS Windows 2003 Enterprise w.sp2 and one subscriber on MS sql 2005 Enterprise w.sp1/MS Windows 2003 w.sp2, but I have also 3 subscriber on MS SQL 2000 w.sp3/MS Windows 2000 advanced server w.sp4. They replicate the same database with a publication compatible with 80RTM, All works fine with data replication, but I can't replicate DDL to MS sql 2005 suscriber, I don't care that don't replicate DDL, but I want manually alter triggers at MS sql 2005 suscriber, but I get this error at the subscriber on when I run the ALTER TRIGGER statement :
Msg 21531, Level 16, State 1, Procedure sp_MSmerge_altertrigger, Line 67
The DDL statement cannot be performed at the Subscriber or Republisher.
Msg 21530, Level 16, State 1, Procedure sp_MSmerge_ddldispatcher, Line 181
The DDL operation failed inside merge DDL replication manipulation.
Msg 3609, Level 16, State 2, Procedure TU_Centros_Distribucion_Articulos, Line 58
The transaction ended in the trigger. The batch has been aborted.
Any help will be appreciated,
PD. I miss sql2000 replication, where I have full control over the database logic
View 14 Replies
View Related
Mar 4, 2008
Howdy Folks!
I just finished an OLEDB interface written in VS2005 C++ that works with Sql Server Compact Edition 3.1. My team now wants me to make my interface compatible with Sql Server 2000, 2005, and 2005 Express. My question is...what header/lib files do I need installed and in my stdafx.h to pull this off? Is there a particular order I need to include these files in?
Right now I'm just including the following for SSCE:
#include <ssceerr30.h>
#include <ssceoledb30.h>
Once I get the right includes figured out, the next step is figuring out what CLSID's I should use in the CoCreateInstance call. I *think* I'm supposed to use CLSID_SQLOLEDB for 2000, CLSID_SQLNCLI for 2005, and I haven't a clue for 2005 Express. I could use some clarification on this as well.
Thanks a ton in advance...I've always been impressed by the MSDN boards...
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 29, 2007
Books online "Deprecated Database Engine Features in SQL Server 2005" makes references to "Features not supported in Future SQL Server versions".
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143729.aspx
Will there be an Upgrade Advisor available to help us identify issues with our code any time soon or should we start building our own?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 24, 2006
One of the big problems with the old MDAC was different versions on different client machines. You would test your app with the latest version say, but when you deployed it, it might fail as the client has a different version.
My company develops software for Municipal Government clients. These clients use other SQL Server applications as well as ours, but they can only use one version of the client software (MDAC) on a given desktop. That means if we require a particular MDAC version, but the clients other applications from other vendors don't officially support that MDAC version, the client is in a real jam.
Our software also supports Oracle, which allows our software to specify a particular Oracle Home which points to a directory with a particular version of the Oracle client dlls (along with corresponding registry entries for that Oracle Home), such that we control the exact client version of the Oracle software that the client uses with our applications. This will not interfere with, and is completely seperate, from the default Oracle home installed when you install the Oracle client software.
What I would like to see for the Native Client is the ability to have our applications use the version of the Native Client that we wish to support and deploy without interfering with the Native Client version used by other applications. Have a default Native Client, but allow applications to somehow specify a different Native Client version/set of DLLs.
Is there any such functionality with the Native Client? (I didn't see any mention of such in the documentation, but I thought I'd ask)
If not, are there any future plans to support multiple Native Client versions on the same desktop?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 12, 2007
I am confused about the version numbers for SQL Server Compact/Mobile. It _looks_ like the versions went from CE 2.0 to Mobile 2005 to CE 3.0 (or 3.1). Is this correct? In fact, I found one location the specifically said Compact Edition is the next version of Mobile. In another location I saw Compact Edition referred to as 2005 CE.
This has got me going because I am creating a Mobile/CE app and I keep getting a "Initialize SQL Server Reconciler" and the best information I can find indicates a mismatch between the server component and the client component.
So, what are the current versions of Mobile/CE? Is there a location that lists all of the components and what version they should be?
Thanks.
Chris Mecum
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 17, 2015
We have installed 2014 sql server. We have currently 2008r2. We have to run the real time report. So we need to set up transactional replication b/n those two servers. We need to use 2008r2 as publisher and 2014 as subscriber.
Is it ok to have subscriber higher version than the publisher?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jun 15, 2007
I currently have three SQL Server instances installed on my notebook. One is v8, which I believe is used by an accounting application. The other two are as follows:-
SQL Server MSSMLBIZ
SQL Server SQLEXPRESS
The second one (SQLEXPRESS) fails to start generating the following error:-
The SQL Server (SQLEXPRESS) service terminated with service-specific error 17058 (0x42A2).
Other services listed in SQL Server Configuration Manager are:-
SQL Server Integration Services - which runs apparently normally.
SQL Server Analysis Services (MSSQLSERVER)
SQL Server Reporting Services (MSSQLSERVER)
SQL Server Browser
The last thre of these are run under LocalSystem.
I have been trying to install the SQLServer SP2 to the SQLEXPRESS instance for some number of days now, but each time it runs, it fails to install.
I am beginning to wonder if there is a sequence of installation for each of the above instances that should be followed. Can anyone give me any suggestions, or answers to the above problems?
Thanks,
View 3 Replies
View Related
