SQL Server 2000: Block Access From Hostname

Apr 8, 2008



Is possible block access to sql server database, from hostame (pc name). I know only the hostname and not the user.
Is possible?


Thanks

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

SQL Server 2008 :: How To Temporarily Block A Table From User Access

Feb 10, 2015

I need to run a script in production that adds primary key to a table. Because table is large, I can't run it in one shot, the log file is not so large to accommodate it. Instead, I created a new table with same structure plus new surrogate primary key, and I populate it in a cursor loop.

I already ran it many times in test server, and no problems with that. But the problem will be in production when applications will be accessing this table and try to insert/update it while I am running my loop.

So I am looking for a solution how to block users to access this table, it's OK if they receive an error. Setting database to single user mode will not work because I don't want to block them from all the rest tables in this database.

View 3 Replies View Related

Block Port 1433 On Windows 2000 Server

Jul 20, 2005

HiI have a question regarding the SQL Server(SQL Server 7) port 1433.Some body is trying to hack into our Windows 2000 server through port1433. Is there a way i can close this port? I tried using a toolcalled Ipsecpol.exe ( Internet Protocol Security Policies Tool). Butwhen we run netstat, it still looks like they are able to connect tothe server using port 1433. Has anyone come across this problem? Iwould appreciate it very much if somebody could send in anysuggestions regarding this.Thanks,Ann

View 6 Replies View Related

Restrict Login Access By Hostname/ip Possible?

Oct 2, 2007

In SQL2005, is it possible to restrict incoming sql or windows authentication logins by source hostname or IP address? Perhaps using endpoints?

We are currently using hosts file on the db server as a temporary solution, but the SA will not allow us to use this as a permanent solution.

The app team I support is asking me to build an "idiot proof" database so that an Dev or Test app server they may configure, doesn't unintentionally connect to the Production database and damage/alter data.

Don't worry, I've already asked if they can't follow some kind of M&P's to prevent this kind of silly behavior, but they insist on DBA team creating a bullet-proof database that can outsmart app developers who try to attempt something dumb like this.

Any ideas or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

TIA,
Phil

Phil Streiff

View 2 Replies View Related

Cannot Access Report Manager Website By Hostname, Only By IP Address...?

Jul 26, 2007

Hello all - this has now happened to me on a few occasions (different installs, different sites, etc.), but my client PCs cannot access Report Manager by the server's hostname (even though I can ping by hostname from the client).

For instance, if I try:

http://ovenserver/reports

I get the infamous "Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage" message.

If I try:

http://10.0.0.20/reports

The Report Manager loads properly without a hitch.

I know I am missing something simple here - can anyone help?

Thanks!

View 10 Replies View Related

Data Access :: HostName / Workstation ID Connection String In Excel

Aug 9, 2011

I currently have the following connection string set up in Excel to connect to my SQL db:
 
Provider=SQLOLEDB.1;Persist Security Info=True;User ID=XXXXXX;Initial Catalog=YYYYY;Data Source=SQL;Use Procedure for Prepare=1;Auto Translate=True;Packet Size=4096;Workstation ID=PROJMNT1;Use Encryption for Data=False;Tag with column collation when possible=False

 What I would like to do is replace the Workstation ID (which apparently is hard coded?) so that the user's workstation name pulls (%COMPUTERNAME%) so that I can see who is connecting, using what, for how long etc etc.

Is there anyway to accomplish this?

View 5 Replies View Related

The Data Access Application Block

Nov 10, 2005

Hi,
Is there anyway I can impliment this in my application without installing it as a COM. My Web Hoster says they won't install it. The Data Access Application Block

View 3 Replies View Related

Data Access Application Block

May 1, 2008

Does anybody knows, from where can I download the latest version of DAAB for SQL CE 3.5?



I know that the Moblie Client Softvare Factory was included a DAAB, but it is outdated in some respect.

So any information will be greatly appreciated.

Gabor

View 3 Replies View Related

Data Access Application Block For SQLClient

Jul 12, 2006

I download the DAAB CF version. However, most of them use SQLCEClient to connect to the database. Is there any DAAB that use SQLClient?
One workaround that I made is I replaced all SQLCEClient objects with the SQLClient objects. I only test one method "ExecuteDataset" and it works so far. However, my question is "does my workaround a good solution?"

Thanks,
Hendra

View 1 Replies View Related

Data Access Application Block: Using In Class Library

Nov 16, 2007

I'm trying to use the Data Access Application block, and am having some issues with configuration. I am using it in a class library, and it seems that with v 3 you need to configure the DAAB first, making changes to the configuration file. However, in a class library, I do not seem to have the web.config or app.config file to change. So where do I need to store the configuration settings?
 Thanks,
Paul

View 3 Replies View Related

How To Specify Failover Using Enterprise Library Data Access Block

Jan 16, 2008

We are expanding an application's database hardware to have a mirrored failover server. Normally in this case we just have the application add "Failover Partner=MirredServerName" in the connection string.

However, this application is using the Enterprise Library Data Access Block and we can't find any documentation describing how to setup the Failover Partner using this library. Any help would be appreciated.

JOHNF

View 3 Replies View Related

Data Access :: Return String From Oracle Anonymous Block

Oct 30, 2015

I am trying to execute oracle procedure (anonymous block) with input and output parameters from ms sql code and return 2 values back:a number and a string.I am using **EXEC() AT** to execute oracle code and return a string back to ms sql. It works fine when returning numbers, but if I add a string output parameter, I am receiving an error:Msg 0, Level 11, State 0, Line 0...A severe error occurred on the current command.  The results, if any, should be discarded.

The server log has the following entry in exception.txt:

Exception 0xc0000005 EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION reading address 00000005031C07E0 at 0x0000000070F9C183
There is also a SQLDump file generated:
* BEGIN STACK DUMP:
*   10/28/15 12:45:38 spid 63
*   Exception Address = 000000005040C183 Module(MSVCR100+000000000003C183)

[code]....

It looks like the problem is in passing varchar2 from oracle into ms sql. I had logging code in oracle block, and it works fine. I have found a few examples of using **exec() at** but there is always only integer output passed back.

View 3 Replies View Related

T-SQL (SS2K8) :: Why Block Scope Variables Exist Outside Of Block

Dec 3, 2014

I have the following stored procedure to test scope of variables

alter proc updatePrereq
@pcntr int,
@pmax int
as
begin

[Code] ....

In the above script @i is declare in the if block only when the @pcntr value is 1. Assume the above stored procedure is called 5 times from this script

declare @z int
set @z = 1
declare @max int
set @max = 5
while @z <= @max
begin
exec dbo.updatePrereq @z, @max
set @z = @z + 1
end
go

As i said earlier `@i` variable exists only when `@pcntr` is `1`. Therefore when i call the stored procedure for the second time and so forth the control cannot enter the if block therefore @i variable wouldn't even exist. But the script prints the value in `@i` in each iteration, How comes this is possible should it throw an error saying `@i` variable does not exist when `@pcntr` values is greater than `1`?

View 1 Replies View Related

Will SQL 2000/2005 Block Me If More Users Connect To It Than I Have Licenses?

Sep 17, 2007

Hello our organization has never had any problems getting users to connect to our SQL servers but we have grown a lot over the past year or two. Does SQL Server actually block connections if they go over the license limit? I don't have access to the servers to see the model used but I have been asked to look into this. I couldn't find any information on this so I decided to ask you guys. Thanks in advance.

View 4 Replies View Related

Connection Pool Limit Reached !! Please Help ! (Using Enterprise Library Data Access Application Block)

Apr 22, 2008

This is my code...
public partial class test : System.Web.UI.Page
{protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{SqlDatabase database = (SqlDatabase)DatabaseFactory.CreateDatabase("ConnectionString");DbCommand command = database.GetSqlStringCommand("SELECT UserName FROM Users WHERE UserID = '6264'");
 using (IDataReader reader = database.ExecuteReader(command))
{if (reader.Read())
{lblTest.Text = "test";
}
}
}
}
 
 
This is my error:
Server Error in '/' Application.


Timeout expired.  The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool.  This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached.
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.InvalidOperationException: Timeout expired.  The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool.  This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached.Source Error:



Line 21: //DbCommand command = database.GetStoredProcCommand("CorrUsers_GetByUserId_s");
Line 22: DbCommand command = database.GetSqlStringCommand("SELECT UserName FROM Users WHERE UserID = '6264'");
Line 23: database.ExecuteReader(command);
Line 24: using (IDataReader reader = database.ExecuteReader(command))
Line 25: {Source File: d:webwwwrootchacha078dev.cha.toplingo.com est.aspx.cs    Line: 23 Stack Trace:



[InvalidOperationException: Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached.]
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection) +1261381
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.OpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory) +105
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open() +111
Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Data.Database.GetNewOpenConnection() +195
Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Data.Database.GetOpenConnection(Boolean disposeInnerConnection) +106
Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Data.Database.ExecuteReader(DbCommand command) +62
test.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) in d:webwwwrootchacha078dev.cha.toplingo.com est.aspx.cs:23
System.Web.Util.CalliHelper.EventArgFunctionCaller(IntPtr fp, Object o, Object t, EventArgs e) +15
System.Web.Util.CalliEventHandlerDelegateProxy.Callback(Object sender, EventArgs e) +33
System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e) +99
System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +47
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +1436

Any help with this matter would be very much appreciated.
 Thank you for your time.
 Sincerely,
 Jeffrey Pham

View 3 Replies View Related

Performance Issues - Access 2000 Frontend SQL Server 2000 Backend

Jul 23, 2005

Hi,Simple question: A customer has an application using Access 2000frontend and SQL Server 2000 backend. Data connection is over ODBC.There are almost 250 concurrent users and is growing. Have theysqueezed everything out of Access? Should the move to a VB.Net frontendtaken place ages ago?CheersMike

View 4 Replies View Related

Maximum Capacity Specifications Comparison Table For Access, SQL Server 7, 2000 And MSDE 2000

May 27, 2008











Parameter
Access 2000/XP
SQL Server 7.0
SQL Server 2000
MSDE 2000

Number of instances per server
n/a
n/a
16
16

Number of databases per instance / server
n/a
32,767
32,767
32,767

Number of objects per database
32,768
2,147,483,647
2,147,483,647
2,147,483,647

Number of users per database
n/a
16,379
16,379
16,379

Number of roles per database
n/a
16,367
16,367
16,367

Overall size of database (excluding logs)
2 GB
1,048,516 TB
1,048,516 TB
2 GB

Number of columns per table
255
1024
1024
1024

Number of rows per table
limited by storage
limited by storage
limited by storage
limited by storage

Number of bytes per row





(Excluding TEXT/MEMO/IMAGE/OLE)
2 KB
8 KB
8 KB
8 KB

Number of columns per query
255
4,096
4,096
4,096

Number of tables per query
32
256
256
256

Size of procedure / query
64 KB
250 MB
250 MB
250 MB

Number of input params per procedure / query
199
1,024
2,100
2,100

Size of SQL statement / batch
64 KB
64 KB
64 KB
64 KB

Depth of subquery nesting
50
32
32
32

Number of indexes per table
32
250 (1 clustered)
250 (1 clustered)
250 (1 clustered)

Number of columns per index
10
16
16
16

Number of characters per object name
64
128
128
128

Number of concurrent user connections
255
32,767
32,767
5

View 1 Replies View Related

Problem Using Access 2000 As A Front-end To SQL Server 2000 Tables

Jul 23, 2005

I've created a small company database where the tables reside in a SQLServer database. I'm using Access 2000 forms for a front end.I've got a System DSN set-up to SQL Server and am using links withinAccess 2000 to get to the SQL Server tables.My forms worked fine until I made a few minor changes to the databaseschema on SQL Server (e.g. added a foreign key, or added a column).After that, all the links break - I click on a table link and get anerror msg like "invalid object name."Deleting the links after a schema change and re-adding the links seemedto fix the problem. The forms I'd already created seemed to work fineafter re-creating the links.But then I got more advanced with my forms. I have it set up so thatfor certain entry fields, the combobox gets populated with values froma table (the description appears in the drop-down and the correspondingprimary key value gets populated in the table). I created a number offorms using this technique, entered data, and everything worked fine.Made a small schema change and it broke everything -- not the actualtable links, but the functionality for the drop-downs. My values nolonger appeared, and this was true for forms that accessed tables whoseschemas did not change.This is driving me nuts. Is there any way to keep my forms frombreaking each time I make a small schema change?Thanks.- Dana

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL Server Name Equil To Hostname

Jan 19, 2008

Can someone explain me, if it's possible to set my SQL servername equal to the hostname of the server ?
 Of the moment, i have to log in with : WS003/sqlexpress
But I want to log in like this : WS003
 
regards

View 4 Replies View Related

Converting Data From Access 2000 To SQL Server 2000

Oct 18, 2004

Hi,
I worked on a project in ASP.NET using SQL server 2000 as the back end. Its a conversion application that I rewrote in ASP.NET using C#. I need to import the old data in Access db into SQL server 2000 and I have very little knowledge about doing it. The data in not a direct one -one transformation. There are considerable changes to the Database design and data types. Any help and suggestions wud be really helpful. Also, any article links wud be great.

Thanks

View 1 Replies View Related

Access 2000 On Windows 2000 Can&#39;t Interact With SQL Server 7.0

Mar 13, 2001

We have a SQL Server 7.0 system in NT 4.0 environment. We upgraded our users to Access 2000 and started to work with this. Now we installed a new
server which is Windows 2000 based and the domain is different from
the SQL servers domain. We then installed Access 2000 on Windows 2000
to use with terminal server. But I noticed that there was a problem
with the program. I then looked at the program which was written on Access 2000 and saw that the tables and views can't be seen. The program runs but
I can't see the views and tables. Another thing is access disconects from SQL Server when I want to see the tables. So what can be the problem.

In one part there is an Access 2000 on Windows 2000 server. On the other part SQL Server 7.0 on Windows NT 4.0. And Access can't see the tables in SQL server.

View 1 Replies View Related

Can I Use A Hostname On Registering The Server With TCPIP?

Jan 7, 1999

Hi everyone,

my SQL is running TCPIP and everytime I register the server from a client, I have to enter in the IP address. Can I use a hostname to map an IP address to a server name and then enter the server name to register the server?

Thanks..Binh

View 2 Replies View Related

Rename Hostname On Server 2005

Nov 16, 2007

Do I have to do anything when hostname (servername) with SQL Server 2005 install was changed from OLDNAME to NEWNAME? If yes, what need to be done and syntax? I notice it under SYSSERVERS table still contain the OLDNAME.

EX. TEST1PROD01 was changed to TEST2PROD01

Thanks,

Vu

View 1 Replies View Related

Connection SQL Server 2005 With DNS Hostname Mismatch

Dec 29, 2006

When using the MS SQL 2005 JDBC driver, I now need to have the DNS nameresolution to the client correctly set up. If not I get the followingerror:SQLState: 08S01SQLError: 0Message: hostname : hostnameWhere "hostname" is the client host name. It doesn't seem to matter ifIuse an IP address or hostname in my connection URL. When searching thenet,I have seen a similar error, but not exactly the same, where themessage is"Hostname: hostname not found" (once again, here "hostname" is theclientmachine) where they suggested the issue was the DNS name conflict.I found the error goes away if the client machine's hostname match theDNSname used for the same IP addess that the DB server is using. Onework-around is to set hostname on the client to the IP address beingused.I know the right thing to do is set the hostname and the DNS namelookup thesame, but I have a customer who doesn't want to do this. They didn'thave tofor 2003, and they don't want to for 2005. Sigh. Is there a way todisablethis feature?

View 3 Replies View Related

Sql Server 2000 Linked Server To Access 97/2000 Incompatability

Jul 20, 2005

We are experiencing a problem with Sql Server 2000 linking to anAccess 97 file. We have two machines that link to this .mdb file, andwe recently upgraded one to newer hardware, SP3a, MDAC 2.8, etc. Thelink on this upgraded machine no longer works, giving this message:Server: Msg 7399, Level 16, State 1, Line 1OLE DB provider 'Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0' reported an error.[OLE/DB provider returned message: Cannot open a database created witha previous version of your application.]OLE DB error trace [OLE/DB Provider 'Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0'IDBInitialize::Initialize returned 0x80004005: ].The link on the older machine still works. We decided to tryconverting a copy of the file to Access 2000 to see if the newerpatches/drivers/whatever no longer supported 97. We set up a link onboth machines to this file, and they both work. However, on theupgraded machine, the following error is receievedServer: Msg 7399, Level 16, State 1, Line 1OLE DB provider 'Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0' reported an error.[OLE/DB provider returned message: System resource exceeded.]OLE DB error trace [OLE/DB Provider 'Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0'ICommandText::Execute returned 0x80004005: ].when making 1-3 connections to the the linked server, while the oldermachine supports at least 7 simultaneous queries connecting to thelinked server and still hasn't produced that error.Does anyone have any idea if there is a known issue with linking toAccess 97/2000 files under MDAC 2.8, Jet 4.0, etc? Any light anyonecan shine on this subject would be greatly appreciated.

View 1 Replies View Related

MS Access 2000 Querying SQL Server 2000

Mar 15, 2004

I am converting a MS Access 2000 project to use SQL Server. This project has uncovered a number of problems, my latest seems to be very odd.

When I query using ADO against the SQL Server database, the results don't seemed to be returned immediately. It's like the access methods being used are waiting too long to write/read the data.

This could be a simple ADO configuration error, but I cannot find any settings that would make this behave so strange.

I'm using OLE/DB drivers with trusted security and attaching using client-side recordsets (I tried server-side as well, same results) to get data for the Access form. In many instances, the data from the form is not yet retrieved when I check the results using the debugger. If I execute the same section of code just seconds later, it works without fail.

I ran the SQL Server Profiler just for grins and found that records were not getting written to the database as I would have expected. Apparently ADO had generated a transaction and rolled it back. (why I don't know) I have looked in Microsoft's support database and on MSDN to no avail. Rather then rewriting my T-SQL as stored procedures for these functions, I'm hoping for some insights from anyone else who has been down this nasty road.

Here is the exact scenario:

Problem #1:
A form that accepts data and has an update button does not update the recordset being used to populate the form. I even coded a rst.Update statement into the code. The record within the recordset isn't updated until the DoCmd.GotoRecord , , acNewRec call has been made.
I suppose I could code the insert statement myself, but shouldn't Access be updating the database for me. (it does have r/w access)

Problem #2:
A subform that performs a query and allows records to be added to a table does not correctly detect data returned from the query. A check is made in the code for a field (which has a value of 0) but the code detects a null value. If I step through this code in the debugger, enough time passes that the value is present and I never see the problem. If I set a breakpoint at the error, the null condition is indicated, even though the debugger shows a value of 0 for the field.

SQL Server version is 2000, with SP3a applied.

I updated the MDAC to 2.8, JET to 8.0 and still the same problem. I cannot find anything in my ADO or Access books for a setting that would cause this behavior. My connection is using the following info:

Set Conn = New ADODB.Connection
Conn.CursorLocation = adUseClient
Set rst = New ADODB.Recordset
Connection string: Provider=SQLOLEDB;Data Source=myserver;Initial Catalog=mydb;Trusted_Connection=Yes;Integrated Security=SSPI;
Recordset Cursor type: adOpenDynamic
Recordset LockType: adLockOptimistic

I open the recordset using:
rst.Open mytable, Conn, adOpenDynamic, adLockOptimistic, adCmdTableDirect

Problem # 1

After manipulating the data in the form, I press a "save" button on the form. This button calls a number of subroutines, eventually executing the code below:

rst.Update
DoCmd.DoMenuItem acFormBar, acRecordsMenu, acSaveRecord, , acMenuVer70

Problem # 2
I set the recordsource using: (in the form_open)
Me.RecordSource = "Select * from mytable where myfield = 'data'"

In the form_unload, the problems occur. It tests for a value stored in the form from the query. This value is null at the time of the code execution, it has a value when inspected within the debugger however.

Maybe I'm missing something here, this project was originally coded using DAO. My conversion to ADO is 95% complete. (all of these two components are converted to ADO) This problem is causing me to miss out on sleep and look like a rookie.

Has anyone seen or heard of something such as this? Is there any hope for this snarled mess of 25K lines of code?

Thanks!

View 3 Replies View Related

Migrating From Access 2000 To SQl Server 2000

Jul 20, 2005

Hi,I have developed an application using VB 6 (SP 5), MS Access 2000 andCrystal Reports 9. I migrated from from access to SQl Server 2000.This wasn't a problem as i could import all the tables to SQL Server.Also, i could make VB6 talk to SQl Server.The problem arsies when i run my application. The sql syntax foraccess seems to be different than that for SQL Server. A simpleexample being: In access boolean datatype is true/false ,whereas inSQL Server the boolean equivalent is bit (numerical 1 or 0). Thesekind of issues are causing problems and most queries don't run.Would i need to go and change all the queries in accordance with SQlServer syntax ,which would be very time consuming or is there anyfunction which will convert the access datatype into its equivalentSQl Server datatype??Any input/thoughts/suggestions would be appreciated.ThanksJatin

View 1 Replies View Related

How To Block Access During Peer-to-peer Transaction Recovery?

Dec 27, 2006

Is there a clean way to block access to a peer which has been offline, during peer-to-peer transaction recovery (while the outstanding transactions are being applied)?

Thanks, Liston

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2008 :: How To Append Hostname / Computername To Text File Using Windows Batch Command

Mar 9, 2015

How to append an hostname/computername to a text file using windows batch command?

View 1 Replies View Related

How To Access Sql Server 2000

May 4, 2007

Hi everyone,
Well, it's a bit difficult to explain this issue. I have written an e-commerce asp.net web site the web site will be hosted on a regular web host that i bought from a hosting company. and we have 2 servers in our company which one of them has internal ip address and the other one has fixed ip address. I have to install my sql 2000 db on the first server(the one with internal ip), I wanted to know that how can I link the the data base to the website via the second server(the one with fixed ip address). I was thinking about using link servers in sql server....
Could any one told me that if it is a good idea or not????

View 1 Replies View Related

What Is The Best Way To Access SQL Server 2000 And DB2-AS/400

Jun 10, 2002

Hello Team,
Could you tell whate are best way or infor regarding accessing SQL Server 2000 and DB2-AS/400 database?.

Thanks,
Ravi

View 3 Replies View Related

Access To SQL Server 2000

Jul 13, 2001

Hello folks,

To begin with, I aplogize for not posting a pure SQL Server question in this forum. I thought some of you might be able to help me out.

I have an Access application (both front and back ends built in Microsoft Access). I don't have the source code which has access forms and the VB code. All I have is an .mde (Access executable) and .mdb (Access database) that carries the actual data. All the forms in .mde are linked to data in this .mdb

We are planning to convert the whole thing into ASP & SQL Server, but before it gets ready, we want to change the back end to SQL Server leaving the front-end App in Access. My plan is to make all the tables in my MDB to linked tables that point to SQL Server. But since my .mde already has linked tables pointing to the access tables in MDB, it is not allowing me to have a linked table pointing to another linked table.

Can anyone let me know if there is any workaround to achieve this? Your help will be very much appreciated.

Thanks,
RV

View 2 Replies View Related

Access & SQL Server 2000

Aug 30, 2001

I am linking to an SQL table through an access database.
I need to add records to the SQL table through the Acess .mdb but
the linked table will not let me.
How can I fix this?
Any help is appreciated.
Kelley

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved