SQL Server 2000 Cluster - Excessive Page Faults
Jul 31, 2007
We are running SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition on a 2-node cluster with IIS/ASP.NET front-end hosting 150-200 active connections. There is a SVCHOST process running under LOCAL SERVICE account - hosting the Remote Registry process that is using only 4,200K but is page faulting 200-500 times per second. I realize this process is used for failover, but the page fault seems excessive. Any thoughts on this?
The servers are running Windows Server 2003 with 4 processors and 4gb RAM.
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Aug 11, 1999
I am running an application on one NT Server, running against SQL Server 6.5 sp 3, and SQL 7 with sp1 applied.
The application is a 'data migration' type application - ie heavy insert and update workload - against many (50+ tables) with many different SQL statements.
The SQL 7 server is configured with 'floating' memory.
On SQL 7 - I am experiencing very high page faults/second for the sqlservr process - sometimes peaking at over 1,000. I was under the impression any number greater than 10 indicates a problem with system performance.
The same application, same data, same NT configuration etc against SQL 6.5 does not page fault. SQL Server 6.5 completes the work faster than 7.
Could anyone help me understand what's going on ?
Thanks in advance.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 13, 2000
My question is, My perfmon counters reads anywhere between 0 and 1200 with the average being around 250 faults/second.
My concern is my memory max size being too large, I have 4gb ram, SQL reports usage at 2.9 GB, my max mem size is 3.9 gb, should I maybe set my SQL server to use a fixed memory size of 2.9 gb?
Thanks in advance
Pete Karhatsu
Copied from SWYNKs' article:
Process: Page Faults/sec
If this value is greater then 0 then the SQL Server process is producing soft page faults and as a result CPU overhead. Try setting the working set size value to be as close to the SQL Server's memory allocation.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 25, 2006
Hi, all.We have a couple of pathological sql servers that have lots and lots ofpage faults per second, up to 4000. Our client programs are written inC#/.NET 1.1 and utilizes connection pooling.Some of the client programs seems to log in hundred of times persecond, as reported by perfmon->.SQLServer:GeneralStatistics->Logins/sec. Stopping the client programs reduces thatnumber significantly.We've done code reviews of the client programs and they look OK.Monitoring .NET connections&pools does not show anything suspicicous.We're currently rewriting the clients to use one db connection insteadof the pools, but that takes some time and may introduce bugs. Doesanyone know why we have these problems and/or why logins/sec is sohigh? I'm thinking "bugs in the .NET client", but really have noidea...One thought I had was that the Page Faults reported for sqlsrv.exe isrelated to memory mapped IO and therefore can be ignored. Right orwrong?Any thoughs/pointers/ideas, even wild guesses, are most welcome.BjørnPS: The server memory is fixed at 1.5GB out of 2GB physical ram,clients run on the same machine and use TCP/IP comm.(I know...) Thehost itself is not paging.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Hi all. Dorky question , but I am still relatively new to the world ofms database servers so bare with me. I am monitoring the page faultrate on a server and it runs at 100% almost all of the time. Cansomeone help me understand what that means?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 8, 2007
Hi
We are planning to upgrade the SQL Server in our production environment from SQL Server 2000 to SQL Server 2005. This is a 4 Node cluster environment with 3 Databases on 3 Virtual instances. The main requirement is to achieve this with no/minimal downtime.
Could you please suggest or direct me to any documentation for the best practices used to upgrade such an environment?
Thanks
Priyanka
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 21, 2006
Hi, I wanted to know that can we access a webpagefrom a store procedure in sql server 2000 like we run a exe file from sql server. Bye.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 3, 2007
We have a SQL2000 database (Publisher) replicating inserts and updates across a 10Mb link to a SQL 2005 database (Subscriber). The Publisher has two tables we are interested in, 1 with 50 columns and 1 with 15. Both tables have 6 insert/update triggers that fire when a change is made to update columns on the publisher database.
We have set up a pull transactional replication from the Subscriber to occur against the Publisher every minute. We have limited the subscription/replication configuration to Publsih 6 columns from table 1 and 4 from table 2. Any change occuring on any other columns in the Publisher are of no interest. The SQL 2005 database has a trigger on table 1 and table 2 to insert values into a third table. There are around 7,000 insert/updates on table 1 and 28,000 on table 2 per day. All fields in the tables are text.
We are seeing "excessive" network traffic occuring of approximately 1MB per minute (approx 2GB per 24 hrs). We also see that the Distributor databases are getting very large -- upto around 30GB and growing until they get culled. We have reduced the culling intrval from 72 hrs to 24 hours to reduce the size.
Does anyone have any suggestions as to how this "excessive" network traffic can be minimised and how the distributor database size can be minimised. I think that maybe they are both related?
Thanks,
Geoff
WA POLICE
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 28, 2007
We're upgrading a SQL Server 2000 cluster (Active/Passive) running on Windows 2000 Server to a SQL Server 2005 Cluster running on Windows Server 2003. We can't purchase new hardware and we have no spare hardware. We also need to move from Windows 2000 Server to Windows 2003 Server at the same time. We want to keep downtime to a bare minimum.
What we were thinking was the following steps... Anyone try this?
1. Break the link between the servers.
2. Install a fresh copy of windows 2003 server on one side along with SQL Server 2005. While this step is running, the active node would still be live on Windows 2000 Server and SQL Server 2000 serving our customers.
3. Restore a copy of a backup from the active production side to the node we're upgrading and at that point we would bring the active node down, switching the active node to be the newly upgraded server.
4. As a final step, the old active node would now have the link to it broken, we would install a fresh copy of windows 2003 server on it and sql server 2005. At this point we would bring it back into the cluster and the cluster would be complete again.
Thoughts?
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 14, 2008
Friends -
Need your help and guidence for doing upgrading SQL Server 2000 Cluster to SQL Server 2005 Cluster.
Let me explain my current environment.
1. Currently SQL Server 2000 Cluster environment is running on Windows 2000 Server we need to upgrade this to SQL Server 2005 on Windows 2003 Server. >>> Production environment.
My Plans:
1. On Testing Environment Install SQL Server 2000 cluster on Windows 2003 Server and do a restore of databases from the produciton environment.
2. Upgrade In-Place from SQL Server 2000 Cluster to SQL Server 2005 Cluster.
My doubts
1. Can i install SQL Server 2000 Cluster on Windows 2003 Server. Is it possible or not.
Please advise me and correct my steps.
Cheers
VSH
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 15, 2008
Friends -
Could any one of you provide steps for upgrading SQL Server 2000 cluster to SQL server 2005 cluster.
My environment is Windows 2003 server.
Appreciate your support.
Cheers
VSH
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 4, 2007
I have two Windows 2000 servers (Advance Edition) to form a Windows Cluster. I also install MS SQL 2000 Enterprise Edition on the cluster to form a MS SQL cluster. Now, I want to upgrade the hardware and OS (but keep on using SQL 2000), so I install Windows 2003 server Enterprise Edition on two new servers to form a new Windows Cluster. I am planing to install MS SQL 2000 Enterprise Edition on the new cluster, so the old SQL cluster and new SQL cluster are side by side. I would like to know how to setup a new SQL cluster (I know it has problem to rename SQL Cluster name, so how to fix this problem)? And how to transfer everything (such as system databases, users database, sql user account, password and maintenance plan jobs etc) from old SQL cluster to new SQL cluster? And how to switch over from old SQL cluster to new SQL cluster?
Thanks a lot !
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Hi,I need manuals, tecnical papres, instalation guide, etc abouthow to install one cluster sql server 2000 64 bits withwindows server 2003.It`s posible a need one document step by step about thisThanks,RaulGZ.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 29, 2008
Hi, could someone tell me if this configuration is possible?
Machine A: Instance 1 (ACTIVE) + Instance 2 (passive) + Instance 3 (pasive)
Machine B: Instance 1 (passive) + Instance 2 (ACTIVE) + Instance 3 (pasive)
Machine C: Instance 1 (passive) + Instance 2 (passive) + Instance 3 (ACTIVE)
I know that it is possible with 2 machines with the clasical solution of Machine1: active-passive, Machine2: passive-active, this way if one of the machines goes down the other one will take the job of both instances, but I dont know if this solution is possible in SQL server 2000 with 3 instances at the same time.
Help please? thanks
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 26, 2008
We have 2 SQL servers in a failover cluster environment. SQL1 and SQL2. Currently SQL1 is the primary in the cluster, and we need to upgrade from Service Pack 3 to Service Pack 4.
Our setup:
Both servers are Windows 2003 Server Enterprise Edition.
Both servers have SQL Server 2000 Service Pack 3.
My question is:
Which upgrade plan do I take? Do I:
1. Upgrade the backup (offline) server in the cluster (SQL2) first, reboot, then failover from SQL1 to SQL2? Then do the other server?
2. Upgrade the primary (online) server in the cluster (SQL1) first and see if it replicates to the backup?
Any advice or tips would be most appreciated.
Thanks.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 2, 2008
We're upgrading a SQL Server 2000 cluster (Active/Passive) running on Windows 2003 Server 32 - bit Standard to a SQL Server 2005 Cluster running on Windows Server 2003 64-bit Enterprise. Our existent cluster's databases are residing on SAN. We can't purchase new hardware and we have no spare hardware. We also need to move from Windows 2003 32-bit Server to Windows 2003 64-bit Enterprise Server at the same time. We want to keep downtime to a bare minimum.
What we were thinking was the following steps... Anyone try this?
1. Break the link between the servers. Or should we just evict the passive node?
2. Install a fresh copy of windows 2003 64-bit server on one side along with SQL Server 2005. While this step is running, the active node would still be live on Windows 2003 32-bit Server and SQL Server 2000 serving our customers.
3. Bring the active server down.
4. Create new cluster on the newly upgraded server and assign the same cluster name and IP as the original one.
5 Bring the luns from SAN to the newly upgraded server and initialize SQL Upgrade
6. As a final step, the old active node will be rebuilt, we would install a fresh copy of windows 2003 64 - bit server on it and sql server 2005. At this point we would bring it back into the cluster and the cluster would be complete again.
Thoughts?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 10, 2006
Hi,
We have a new failover cluster (Windows 2003 SP1, Microsoft SQL 2000 SP4) with each node of the cluster hosting 7 SQL Server instances in a 2-node active-active configuration connected to a SAN. We are planning to move some SQL Server Instances(from existing stand-alone servers) into this Cluster. Any insight into the process of moving SQL Servers into the cluster would be highly appreciated.
Best Regards,
Himansu
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 8, 2001
Hey guys,
Lately we have come across a problem where our application is undergoing some extreme load against the SQL 2000 server database we have setup, where the server is hitting 100% CPU utilization each time. Currently the box is a 2 processor box.
Here is the question I have. I have seen under most SQL Server clusters that an active/passive setup is implemented. Where the passive server just exists as a failover mechanism. What I am looking for is some information on how to setup active/active setup where each server receives processes to handle.
Has anyone created a setup like this? Are there any standard benchmarking tools that can be used to see how this configuration increases performance? Is this setup more favorable than going to a 4 processor server as oppossed to our current 2 processor server?
BTW: We have noticed that after a web application where the user sits idle for a while the SQL Server application loses the connection with the application user...Is this the SQL Timeout causing the connection to disconnect?
Thanx for any response...
Bri
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 24, 2008
Friends -
Currently we are using SQL Server 2000 Cluster (Active/Active) on windows 2000 advance server.
This cluster contains two nodes.
Is it possible to add another two nodes on the existing cluster, please provide me steps or any link.
Appreciate your support
Cheers:)
satish
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 13, 2006
I have a production failover cluster running SQL Server 2000 at SP3that I want to upgrade to SP4. I do not have a test failover clusterto test with so I need the install on the primary server to work thefirst time. Per the information I have I just install the patch on theprimary server and it will install both on the primary and on thesecondary.However, I remember when I did the initial install and it failed. Thefirst problem traced to the fact that the install uses temporary filesunder the profile of the installing administrator and the id had neverlogged into the second server so the install failed on creating thetemporary file. The was a second problem that related to an OS featurethat had to be off for the install to work.If anyone out there has done this upgrade and remembers encountering aproblem and its fix/workaround I would appreciate a head up warning.Thank you-- Mark D Powell --
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 5, 2007
We have a sql2000 clustered server running on a windows 2003 cluster, today we noticed that the
SQL resources where in a Online Pending state and do not came up anymore.
I have searched the net and found some info about the sqlstate = 08001 Native error 11 , witch indicated that the SQL Network name could have been renamed , however this is not the case here , .
i also found that there might be Resolve issue but The Cluster Name and the SQL Network name can be resolved by both Cluster nodes ..
does anyone here got experience with this kind of problem ? Pls Help
Here is a part of the cluster.log with the errors :
ERR SQL Server : [sqsrvres] ODBC sqldriverconnect failed
ERR SQL Server : [sqsrvres] checkODBCConnectError: sqlstate = 08001; native error = 11; message = [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][DBNETLIB]SQL Server does not exist or access denied.
ERR SQL Server : [sqsrvres] ODBC sqldriverconnect failed
ERR SQL Server : [sqsrvres] checkODBCConnectError: sqlstate = 01000; native error = 2; message = [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][DBNETLIB]ConnectionOpen (Connect()).
ERR SQL Server : [sqsrvres] ODBC sqldriverconnect failed
ERR SQL Server : [sqsrvres] checkODBCConnectError: sqlstate = 08001; native error = 11; message = [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][DBNETLIB]SQL Server does not exist or access denied.
ERR SQL Server : [sqsrvres] ODBC sqldriverconnect failed
ERR SQL Server : [sqsrvres] checkODBCConnectError: sqlstate = 01000; native error = 2; message = [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][DBNETLIB]ConnectionOpen (Connect()).
INFO [CP] CppRegNotifyThread checkpointing key SOFTWAREMicrosoftMicrosoft SQL ServerDBHSBMSSQLSERVER to id 4 due to timer
INFO [Qfs] QfsGetTempFileName C:DOCUME~1SRVCCL~1LOCALS~1Temp, CLS, 13 => C:DOCUME~1SRVCCL~1LOCALS~1TempCLSD.tmp, status 0
According to the SQL server log the server is started and all databases are brought on-line then a stop request from Service Control Manager terminates SQL Server see log below:
2007-11-05 14:04:02.89 server Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2039 (Intel X86)
May 3 2005 23:18:38
Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation
Enterprise Edition on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: )
2007-11-05 14:04:02.89 server Copyright (C) 1988-2002 Microsoft Corporation.
2007-11-05 14:04:02.89 server All rights reserved.
2007-11-05 14:04:02.89 server Server Process ID is 3264.
2007-11-05 14:04:02.89 server Logging SQL Server messages in file 'P:mssqlMSSQL$DBHSBlogERRORLOG'.
2007-11-05 14:04:02.89 server SQL Server is starting at priority class 'high'(2 CPUs detected).
2007-11-05 14:04:03.61 server initdata: Warning: Could not set working set size to 823168 KB.
2007-11-05 14:04:03.66 server SQL Server configured for thread mode processing.
2007-11-05 14:04:03.72 server Using dynamic lock allocation. [2500] Lock Blocks, [5000] Lock Owner Blocks.
2007-11-05 14:04:03.77 server Attempting to initialize Distributed Transaction Coordinator.
2007-11-05 14:04:06.32 spid2 Starting up database 'master'.
2007-11-05 14:04:06.52 spid2 Server name is 'HSBSQL01DBHSB'.
2007-11-05 14:04:06.52 spid5 Starting up database 'msdb'.
2007-11-05 14:04:06.52 spid6 Starting up database 'model'.
2007-11-05 14:04:06.52 spid8 Starting up database 'dbHSB'.
2007-11-05 14:04:06.52 server Using 'SSNETLIB.DLL' version '8.0.2039'.
2007-11-05 14:04:06.56 server SQL server listening on 10.122.131.103: 1433.
2007-11-05 14:04:06.62 spid8 Analysis of database 'dbHSB' (7) is 100% complete (approximately 0 more seconds)
2007-11-05 14:04:06.63 server SQL server listening on TCP, Shared Memory, Named Pipes.
2007-11-05 14:04:06.63 server SQL Server is ready for client connections
2007-11-05 14:04:06.66 spid6 Clearing tempdb database.
2007-11-05 14:04:07.10 spid6 Starting up database 'tempdb'.
2007-11-05 14:04:07.20 spid2 Recovery complete.
2007-11-05 14:04:07.20 spid2 SQL global counter collection task is created.
2007-11-05 14:04:16.41 spid1 Warning: unable to allocate 'min server memory' of 1658MB.
2007-11-05 14:10:45.18 spid2 SQL Server is terminating due to 'stop' request from Service Control Manager.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 6, 2002
We shall be taking a bunch of 7.0 instances and moving/upgrading to a SQL 2000 cluster server. I was thinking of creating new named instances on the 2000 cluster and upgrading each 7.0 server to it's respective named instance. Also thought of using the 2000 copy database wizard; I was told this didn't always work. Anyone hear of problems with this?
Thanks
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 17, 2007
Hello.
Has anyone attempted and successfully installed SQL Server 2000 SP4
via remote desktop on the cluster.
The reason I am asking is that SP4 readme file has this:
"...
4.3 Systems Management Server Distributed Installation
You cannot install Database Components SP4 from a remote location.
..."
Currently SQL Server has SP3a installed.
Thank you in advance.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 8, 2007
I have a SQL 2000 clustered environment with 4 SQL instances and i need to remove a specific instance from the cluster the resources(physical drive,virtual IP,instance name) being used by it
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 26, 2006
I have a Windows 2003 Enterprise x64 edition cluster setup and functioning normally. Now, I am trying to get SQL Server 2000 installed as a failover cluster but am having some difficulty. When installing, I get the message '[sqsrvres] ODBC sqldriverconnect failed' in the event log. The message happens when the installer is trying to bring the SQL Server Service resource online.
I am able to ping the name of the instance successfully. I am able to manually start the 'MSSQL$InstanceName' service. I have turned off the firewall on both machines, but this did not help. I have the DTC Service setup as a resource in the same cluster group.
I also read http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;815431 which seemed promising, but did not reolve the problem.
Any help would be much appreciated.
Andy
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 14, 2006
I have upgraded our test server and on non cluster production machine. My next server is a cluster and I don't have a test cluster server. Do I upgrade the active node and that is all or am I going to need to fail it over and upgrade the other node.
Also the prerequesite for the upgrade advisor is .net 2.0 I am going to up that on each server one at a time but I am only going to add the upgrade advisor to one node is that ok.
I read the SP1 documentation and it clearly states only patch the active node and do not patch the inactive nodes.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 7, 2000
I can't get my asp page creatd in Front Page 2000 to dump info into SQL database...am I missing something?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 7, 2000
What is the default page size in sql server 2000....?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 20, 2006
Can multiple SQL instances (sql server 2000 and sql server 2005) be clustered in an active/active environment?
Thank you.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jul 14, 2007
hi friends, i need a code for storing and receiving an image to/fro SQL SERVER 2000 (in C#). i had searched some sites, all are in VB for windows forms not for website. finally i got a code from some site. it is working for storing purpose. not working for receiving purpose. the code for receiving and displaying purpose is (in a fresh page) private void Page_Load(object sender, System.EventArgs e){ // Put user code to initialize the page here MemoryStream stream = new MemoryStream (); SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection (@"server=INDIAINDIA;database=iSense;uid=sa;pwd=india"); try { connection.Open (); SqlCommand command = new SqlCommand ("select Picture from Image", connection); byte[] image = (byte[]) command.ExecuteScalar (); stream.Write (image, 0, image.Length); Bitmap bitmap = new Bitmap (stream); Response.ContentType = "image/gif"; bitmap.Save (Response.OutputStream, ImageFormat.Gif); } finally { connection.Close (); stream.Close (); }}what s the problem is.........i'm getting an exception at Bitmap instantiation.(i.e Bitmap bitmap = new Bitmap (stream);)exception is "Parameter is not valid" what is the problem with that coding? was it correct? do u have any code for this in C#? if so, pls provide that......help me........pls.............
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Hi,When i eg. manually ad entries to a table and, cancels the insert Ms SQLincrement the counter on the ID anyway. Is there a way to avoid thisbehavior?RegardsAnders
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 28, 2006
Hi folks,
I'm having trouble getting off the ground with the Web application walkthrough "Walkthrough: Creating a Web Application Using Visual C# or Visual Basic" in VS.NET Pro 2002 [Academic] documentation. After a bit of fishing around, and consulting the MS Knowledge Base, I got the pubs database installed. I also got the connection to work well enough that the dataset would fill in the IDE.
The problem is that when I try to run the web form, either from the IDE debug menu, or by accessing the .aspx file on localhost using Firefox, I get the error:
SELECT permission denied on object 'titles', database 'pubs', owner 'dbo'.
showing in the browser.
My understanding is that this page is running as ASPNET, and I did already carry out the recommended commands to enable access:
C:>osql -E -S MY-MACHINE-NAMEVSDOTNET -Q "sp_grantlogin 'MY-MACHINE-NAMEASPNET'"
C:>osql -E -S MY-MACHINE-NAMEVSDOTNET -d Pubs -Q "sp_grantdbaccess 'MY-MACHINE-NAMEASPNET'"
both of which commands returned successfully. Any suggestions as to what else I should do to get the necessary permissions to actually display the data in my browser? Does the IIS user account need permission also?
Thanks for any insight into this vexing problem. I must say that along the way, I have had some fun exploring the osql comand-line tool. Using the -E switch, I have been able to run select and upgrade queries, but this is all pretty much fishing in the dark. I would like to get back to actually working with the walthroughs in the Visual Studio documentation.
Thanks,
Joseph
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 25, 2007
We have a large number of clients attempting to replicate two publications on 2005 Express databases (2 publications subscribed to the one subscriber database) with our 2005 Server (9.00.3042.00 SP2 Standard Edition) and experiencing two significant problems:
1) Users experience the following message:
The Merge Agent failed after detecting that retention-based metadata cleanup has deleted metadata at the Subscriber for changes not yet sent to the Publisher. You must reinitialize the subscription (without upload).
This problem should not apparently occur with SQL Server 2005 (or 2005 Express) instances with SP2 applied. All clients experiencing this problem have SP2 installed as does our Server and the retention period is 30 days. The subscribers have been replicating well under that.
2) Replications never succeed after appearing to replicate/loop around for hours
This issue is the most critical as we have clients who have been installed and re-installed with new instances of SQL Server 2005 Express, new empty databases (on subscriber before snapshot extraction), and using fresh snapshots (less than an few hours old) which cannot successfully replicate.
Interestingly there is at least 1 instance where several computers are subscribed and successfully replicating the same database as another where replication refuses to succeed.
To test we have taken a republished database from another 2005 Server which is working fine and restored it to the same server as the one holding the database with which we are experiencing problems and subscribed to it. This test worked fine and replication of both publications went through fast and repeatedly without showing any signs of problem.
This indicates that the problem is perhaps data related as it appears localised to that database.
Below are two screenshots which may assist.
Screenshot 1 Shows that on the server side the replication attempts look like they are succeeding despite the fact that the subscriber end does not indicate success. Also the history indicates the the subscription has spent all it's time initialising and not merging any changes.
Screenshot 2 Shows a rogue process which has appears on many of the problem child subscribers. It shows a process running with no end time even though the job indicates failure in the message and even though other replication attempts appear to have succeeded after it. This process stays in the history showing that it is running even when I can find no corresponding process for it.
Can anyone suggest a further course of action/further testing/further information required which may assist?
This is extremely urgent and any assistance would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks in advance!
Scott
View 5 Replies
View Related
