I'm using Java to connect to a SQL Server 2000 database. I connect using the Driver Manager with Sun's odbc driver ( sun.jdbc.odbc.JdbcOdbcDriver ) or I can use the jdbc driver provided by Microsoft (com.microsoft.jdbc.sqlserver.SQLServerDriver)
The Java application makes 1 Connection.
Within the database there exists a stored procedure that updates 2 Tables. The tables have a fixed number of rows that get updated continuously by calls to this stored procedure.
The Java application has a thread pool of 15 threads that create 15 CallableStatements (1 per thread) using the same instance of the Connection object.
According the the Microsoft JDBC driver docs, 1 Connection with multiple calls to the Callable statements is how it's supposed to be done. The following is an excerpt from Microsoft's "SQL Server 2000 Driver for JDBC User’s Guide and Reference" (page 86) regarding Connection Managment:
Managing Connections
Connection management is important to application performance. Optimize your application by connecting once and using multiple statement objects, instead of performing multiple connections. Avoid connecting to a data source after establishing an initial connection.
This is precisely what I'm doing, but I do not know if the the stored procedures are being run concurrently, the documentation does not tell me.
So my question: What is happening inside SQL Server 2000?
I've implemented an SQL-CLR stored procedure which makes an HTTP connection using the WebClient class to a server where the processing on the web server takes 10 seconds.
If I fire off a bunch of requests to the stored procedure, e.g. 80 in 1 second I noticed that SQL Server 2005 (Express Edition) only allows 2 concurrent network connections at a time.
I can confirm this by looking at the timing of the results when they come back, basically I get 2 results every 10 seconds and by doing a 'netstat -a' on the web server I notice that there are never more than 2 HTTP connections from the SQL Server at a time.
Is this some sort of sheduling policy in terms of the number of concurrent external network accesses allowed by CLR objects running in SQL Server? Or some side effect of the way the WebClient class blocks in terms of waiting for a network response?
I was expecting all 80 of the requests to block waiting on a network response almost immediately and then for all 80 of them to pretty much complete and return 10-11 seconds later.
[Microsoft.SqlServer.Server.SqlProcedure]
public static int CreditAuthorisation(string Name, decimal Amount)
{
WebClient client = new WebClient();
string result = client.DownloadString("http://someserver/Test.aspx");
I have a database in sql server 2000. In this i have used identity(seed,increment) property so that unique ids may be available. Now if requests from diffrent users arrives at same time on the server, will there be a conflict because of ids?
I am calling a stored procedure (say X) and from that stored procedure (i mean X) i want to call another stored procedure (say Y)asynchoronoulsy. Once stored procedure X is completed then i want to return execution to main program. In background, Stored procedure Y will contiue his work. Please let me know how to do that using SQL Server 2000 and ASP.NET 2.
I am trying to get the DTS Execute SQL task to run a simple sql server 2000no-parameter stored procedure.The procedure runs without error when using SQL Analyzer but DTS Execute SQLreports "could not find stored procedure "[dbo].[test]"The stored procedure is as follows:create procedure test asdeclare tnames_cursor CURSORforselect database_name, tmp_table_name from[DW_Dimensions].[dbo].[vw_dimension_temporary_tables_active]open tnames_cursordeclare @tablename sysnamedeclare @databasename sysnamewhile (@@FETCH_STATUS <> -1)beginselect @databasename = rtrim(@databasename)select @tablename = rtrim(@tablename)exec ("delete from " + @databasename + ".dbo." + @tablename)fetch next from tnames_cursor into @databasename, @tablenameendclose tnames_cursordeallocate tnames_cursorGOAny ideas?
I have a stored procedure that builds a sql statement and executes it. When run in Query Analyzer it runs successfully and displays records as it should. When I open a recordset with the stored procedure from VBA it executes the codes but doesn't open the recordset.
The store procedure is: ALTER PROCEDURE dbo.spTest AS DECLARE @sColumns varchar(2000) DECLARE @sFrom varchar(2000) DECLARE @sWhere varchar(2000) DECLARE @sSqlString AS nvarchar(2000) SET @sColumns = 'dbo.tblDoctor.lastname ' SET @sFrom = 'FROM dbo.tbldoctor ' SET @sWhere = 'WHERE dbo.tbldoctor.doctorcode is not null ' SET @sSqlString = 'SELECT ' + @scolumns + ' ' + @sFrom + ' ' + @swhere PRINT '@scolumns ' + @scolumns
The VBA code is: Private Sub Command0_Click() Dim cn As Connection Dim rs As New ADODB.Recordset Dim strsql As String Set cn = CurrentProject.Connection strsql = "exec spTest" With rs
.Source = strsql .ActiveConnection = cn .CursorType = adOpenKeyset .LockType = adLockReadOnly .Open End With Debug.Print rs.RecordCount & " records found" End Sub When it hits the line with rs.recordcount it displays the following error: "Operation is not allowed when object is closed" referring to the rs recordset never being opened.
I am new to the forum and I have a problem with a stored procedure in SQL Server 2000. I use a stored procedure that returns a string but the problem is that my variable is empty at least I think it's empty.
With the code below the variable is not empty: set @Ssql = 'select Cust_Company_id, fix_price from GEC_FixPrice where priority > 0 and cust_company_id like ' + char(39) + @InvoiceLine_CustCompanyid + char(39) + ''
But when I use the code below it's empty
- set @sSql = 'select Cust_Company_id, fix_price from GEC_FixPrice where priority > 0 ' - set @sSql = @sSql + ' and cust_company_id like ' + char(39) + @InvoiceLine_CustCompanyid + char(39) + ''
I also tried this :
- set @Start = 'select Cust_Company_id, fix_price from GEC_FixPrice where priority > 0 ' - set @End = ' and cust_company_id like ' + char(39) + @InvoiceLine_CustCompanyid + char(39) + '' - set @sSql = @Start + @End
This works also, so I don't get why the second example won't work and the second example is the one I want to use.
Hi All,I have a table that holds pregenerated member IDs.This table is used to assign an available member id to web sitevisitors who choose to register with the siteSo, conceptually the process has been, from the site (in ASP), to:- select the top record from the members table where the assigned flag= 0- update the row with details about the new member and change theassigned flag to 1- return the selected member id to the web pageNow I'm dealing with the idea that there may be brief, high trafficperiods of registration, so I'm trying to build a method (storedprocedure?) that will ensure the same member id isn't returned by theselect statement if more than 1 request to register happens at thesame instant.So, my question is, is there a way, once a record has been selected,to exclude that record from other select requests, within the boundsof a stored procedure?ie:- select statement is executed and row is instantly locked; any otherselect statement running at that exact moment will receive a differentrow returned and sill similarly lock it, ad nauseum for as manysimultaneous select statements as take place- row is updated with details and flag is updated to indicate themember id is no longer unassigned- row is released for general purposes etcIf what I'm suggesting above isn't practical, can anyone help meidentify a different way of achieving the same result?Any help immensely, immensely appreciated!Much warmth,Murray
I have no idea about how can I use xp_sendmail when I try to use it this error displayed on the screen. There is no default mail client or the current mail client cannot fulfill the messaging request. Please run Microsoft Outlook and set it as the default mail ...
I am developing a windows application in VB.Net 2005 and Database is SQl Server 2000.I want to insert, update and delete records from a master table which has 8 columns.So should I write a stored procedure for this or write three queries and execute them in code.I haven't used stored procedure before. What will be advantages of using stored procedures?And tell me how to write stored procedure to insert,update and delete. Then how to call it in VB.Net code.
Hi, I have a problem with "database output" window in executing a select-sp in vs 2005 standard. The db is a sql server 2000 one.When I execute the sp within VS, the database output correctly displays the execution information:No rows affected.(1 row(s) returned)@RETURN_VALUE = 3 but I can't see the returned rows (3 rows are returned); I only see the column names and no data.Running [dbo].[spBkm_GetList] ( @IDUser = <DEFAULT>, [.........]).IDBkm UIBkm IDUser --------------------- -------------------------------------- --------- No rows affected. If I run the same sp in Sql Server Manager Studio Express it correctly shows the data of the 3 rows returned. The sp uses EXEC sp_executesql @Sql, @ParamList, ...... for executing the sql statement and the last line of sp is RETURN @@ROWCOUNTI've tried removing the "RETURN @@ROWCOUNT" with no success. The problem affects only one sp, the others, which are absolutely similar, work properly . I don't know what is the problem...Any idea?Thanks in advance
I am trying to run xp_cmdshell from the Query Analyzer using SQLServer 2000 running on Windows 98.It seems like it should be simple - I'm typingxp_cmdshell 'dir *.exe'in the Query Analyzer in the Master db. I'm logged in as sa.The timer starts running and never stops. No error message.Can anyone PLEASE help me with this? Any suggestions would beappreciated. Are SQL Server 2000 extended stored procedures notsupported in Windows 98? I've tried searching the Knowledge Base butcan't find anything.Thanks!
I was wondering if someone can point out the error or the thing I shouldn't be doing in a stored procedure on SQL Server 2005. I want to switch from SQL Server 2000 to SQL Server 2005 which all seems to work just fine, but one stored procedure is causing me headache.
I could pin the problem down to this query:
DECLARE @Package_ID bigint
DECLARE @Email varchar(80)
DECLARE @Customer_ID bigint
DECLARE @Payment_Type tinyint
DECLARE @Payment_Status tinyint
DECLARE @Booking_Type tinyint
SELECT @Package_ID = NULL
SELECT @Email = NULL
SELECT @Customer_ID = NULL
SELECT @Payment_Type = NULL
SELECT @Payment_Status = NULL
SELECT @Booking_Type = NULL
CREATE TABLE #TempTable(
PACKAGE_ID bigint,
PRIMARY KEY (PACKAGE_ID))
INSERT INTO
#TempTable
SELECT
PACKAGE.PACKAGE_ID
FROM
PACKAGE (nolock) LEFT JOIN BOOKING ON PACKAGE.PACKAGE_ID = BOOKING.PACKAGE_ID
LEFT JOIN CUSTOMER (nolock) ON PACKAGE.CUSTOMER_ID = CUSTOMER.CUSTOMER_ID
LEFT JOIN ADDRESS_LINK (nolock) ON ADDRESS_LINK.SOURCE_TYPE = 1 AND ADDRESS_LINK.SOURCE_ID = CUSTOMER.CUSTOMER_ID
LEFT JOIN ADDRESS (nolock) ON ADDRESS_LINK.ADDRESS_ID = ADDRESS.ADDRESS_ID
AND PACKAGE.CUSTOMER_ID = ISNULL(@Customer_ID,PACKAGE.CUSTOMER_ID)
AND PACKAGE.PAYMENT_TYPE = ISNULL(@Payment_Type,PACKAGE.PAYMENT_TYPE)
AND PACKAGE.PAYMENT_STATUS = ISNULL(@Payment_Status,PACKAGE.PAYMENT_STATUS)
AND BOOKING.BOOKING_TYPE = ISNULL(@Booking_Type,BOOKING.BOOKING_TYPE)
-- If this line below is included the request will take about 90 seconds whereas it takes 1 second if it is outcommented
--AND ADDRESS.EMAIl LIKE '%' + ISNULL(@Email, ADDRESS.EMAIL) + '%'
GROUP BY
PACKAGE.PACKAGE_ID
DROP TABLE #TempTable
The request is performing quite well on the SQL Server 2000 but on the SQL Server 2005 it takes much longer. I already installed the SP2 x64, I'm running the SQL Server 2005 on a x64 environment. As I stated in the comment in the query it takes 90 seconds to finish with the line included, but if I exclude the line it takes 1 second. I think there must be something wrong with the join's or something else which has maybe changed in SQL Server 2005. All the tables joined have a primary key. Maybe you folks can spot the error / mistake / wrong type of doing things easily. I would appreciate any help you can offer me to solve this problem.
On the web I saw that there is a Cumulative Update 4 for the SP2 which fixes the following:
942659 (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/942659/) FIX: The query performance is slower when you run the query in SQL Server 2005 than when you run the query in SQL Server 2000
Anyhow I think the problem is something else, I haven't tried out the cumulative update yet, as I think it is something different, more general why this query takes ages to process.
I had few stored procedures which were working in SQL server 2000. I upgraded SQL server to 2005 and one stored procedure does not work. It gives the Error Msg 102. "Syntax error near ',' " I already tried set quoted identifiers ON & OFFAny help would be appriciated.
I hav the following problem. I have written an stored procedure in sql server 2000 as the following CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.pa_rellena @pFechaInicio datetime
AS declare @pFechaFin datetime declare @auxcod_cen char(10)
--Borramos las tablas temporales si las hemos creado con anterioridad y no se han borrado if object_id('tmpCentros') is not null drop table tmpCentros
if object_id('tmpCentros2') is not null drop table tmpCentros2
if object_id('tmpMaxCajas') is not null drop table tmpMaxCajas
if object_id('tmpCajasCentro') is not null drop table tmpCajasCentro
if object_id('tmpVales') is not null drop table tmpVales
if object_id('tmpDiarioEfectivo') is not null drop table tmpDiarioEfectivo
if object_id('tmpDiarioTalones') is not null drop table tmpDiarioTalones
if object_id('tmpDiarioTarjetas') is not null drop table tmpDiarioTarjetas
if object_id('tmpDiarioSegundaForma') is not null drop table tmpDiarioSegundaForma
if object_id('tmpDiarioGastosTarjetas') is not null drop table tmpDiarioGastosTarjetas
if object_id('temp1') is not null drop table temp1
--Seleccionamos todos los centros de Salvador Bachiller select * into tmpCentros2 from centros where centros.tienda=1 order by cod_cen
--Seleccionamos el maximo de cajas por cada centro
select cod_cen, max(cod_caja) as cajas into tmpMaxCajas from cierrecaja where fecha>=@pFechaInicio and fecha<@pFechaFin group by cod_cen order by cod_cen
--Mezclamos los centros con el maximo de cajas select c.cod_cen, c.Centro, c.Direccion, c.localidad, c.provincia, c.cpostal, c.telefono, m.cajas, operaciones, cajas_tot, tienda, franquicia into tmpCentros from tmpCentros2 as c left outer join tmpMaxCajas as m on c.cod_cen=m.cod_cen
--Cajas por centro select distinct cod_cen as cod_cen, cod_caja as cod_caja into tmpCajasCentro from cierrecaja where fecha>=@pFechaInicio and fecha<@pFechaFin
--Los vales de cada centro select cod_cen,sum(importe) as imp1 into tmpVales from vales where fecha>=@pFechaInicio and fecha<@pFechaFin group by cod_cen
--Efectivo de cada centro select cod_cen,'01' as vendedor,'EFECTIVO' as descripcion, (sum(diario.TotEuro)-Sum(Diario.Imppa2)) as importe1,0 as exp1, (sum(Diario.TotEuro)-sum(Diario.imppa2)) as importe2 into tmpDiarioEfectivo from diario where fecha>=@pFechaInicio and fecha<@pFechaFin and cod_cen in (select cod_cen from tmpCentros) and cod_caja in (select cod_caja from tmpCajasCentro) and diario.cod_pago='01' group by cod_cen
--Talones por centro select centros.cod_cen,'02' as vendedor,'TALONES' as descripcion, sum(diario.TotEuro) as importe1,0 as exp1, sum(Diario.TotEuro) as importe2 into tmpDiarioTalones from centros inner join diario on centros.cod_cen=diario.cod_cen where fecha>=@pFechaInicio and fecha<@pFechaFin and diario.cod_cen in (select cod_cen from tmpCentros) and cod_caja in (select cod_caja from tmpCajasCentro) and diario.cod_pago='02' group by centros.cod_cen
--Tarjetas por centro select cod_cen,'03' as vendedor,'TARJETAS' as descripcion, sum(diario.TotEuro) as importe1,0 as exp1, sum(Diario.TotEuro*(FPago.Descuento/100)) as importe2, sum(Diario.TotEuro) - sum(Diario.TotEuro*(FPago.Descuento/100)) as importe3 into tmpDiarioTarjetas from FPago left join Diario on fpago.Cod_pago=Diario.cod_pago where fecha>=@pFechaInicio and fecha<@pFechaFin and cod_cen in (select cod_cen from tmpCentros) and cod_caja in (select cod_caja from tmpCajasCentro) and Fpago.Descuento<>0 group by cod_cen
--Segunda Froma de Pago select cod_cen,'03' as vendedor,'TARJETAS' as descripcion,sum(diario.imppa2) as importe1 into tmpDiarioSegundaForma from fpago left join Diario on Fpago.cod_pago=diario.cod_pa1 where fPago.cod_pago<>'99' and fecha>=@pfechaInicio and fecha<@pFechaFin and cod_cen in (select cod_cen from tmpCentros) and cod_caja in (select cod_caja from tmpCajasCentro) and Fpago.Descuento<>0 group by cod_cen
--Comisiones tarjetas de pago select cod_cen,'10' as vendedor, 'GASTOS (-)' as descripcion, sum(Diario.imppa2*(fPago.Descuento/100)) as importe2 into tmpDiarioGastosTarjetas from Fpago left join Diario on FPago.cod_pago= Diario.cod_pa1 where fPago.cod_pago<>'99' and fecha>=@pFechaInicio and fecha<@pFechaFin and cod_cen in (select cod_cen from tmpCentros) and cod_caja in (select cod_caja from tmpCajasCentro) and Fpago.Descuento<>0 group by cod_cen /* --Venta neta por centro declare cursortemporal cursor for select cod_cen from TmpCentros2
open cursortemporal delete detallecaja_aux fetch next from cursortemporal into @auxcod_cen while @@fetch_status=0 Begin select @importeVales=imp1 from tmpVales where cod_cen=@auxcod_Cen select @importeEfectivo=importe2 from tmpDiarioEfectivo where cod_cen=@auxcod_Cen select @importeTalones=importe2 from tmpDiarioTalones where cod_cen=@auxcod_cen select @importeTarjetas1=importe3 from tmpDiarioTarjetas where cod_cen=@auxcod_cen select @importeTarjetas2=importe1 from tmpDiarioSegundaForma where cod_cen=@auxcod_cen select @importeGastos=importe2 from tmpDiarioGastosTarjetas where cod_cen=@auxcod_cen
insert into detallecaja_aux (cod_cen,importe1) values(@auxcod_cen, @importeVales+@importeEfectivo+@ImporteTalones+@ImporteTarjetas1+@importeTarjetas2-@importeGastos) fetch next from cursortemporal into @auxcod_cen
This question applies to both SQL Server 2000 and 2005.
I want to create a stored procedure that only one user at a time can execute. I know I do not want to use sp_getapplock. Does anyone know how can I accomplish this task. If so please provide a small example.
I have a requirement that requires detection of rows deleted/updated byother processes. My business objects call stored procedures to create,read, update, delete data in a SQL Server 2000 data store. I've donea fair amount of research on concurrency handling in newsgroups andother resources. Below is what I've come up as a standard forhandling concurrency thru stored procedures. I am sharing with everyoneso I can get some comments (pro/con) regarding this approach and see ifanyone can find any holes for this solution.Below is the DDL, DML and a Stored Proc demonstrating the approach. Iam using a rowversion column for concurrency checking. Another approachthat is less intrusive (doesn't require having a rowversion column inall tables) is using checksum. I may eventually use checksum but theprocess flow should be almost identical. Looking forward to anyone'scomments.Thx, BZ--xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx--IF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM sysobjects WHERE type = 'U' AND name ='ApplicationUsers')BEGINPRINT 'Dropping Table ApplicationUsers'DROP Table dbo.ApplicationUsersENDGOPRINT 'Creating Table ApplicationUsers'GOCREATE TABLE dbo.ApplicationUsers(LoginName varchar (20) NOT NULL Primary Key,LoginPassword varchar (50) NOT NULL,LoginAttempts int NOT NULL default(0),EmailAddress varchar(25) NOT NULL Unique,DataVersion rowversion NOT NULL)GOIF EXISTS (SELECT * FROM sysobjects WHERE type = 'P' AND name ='UpdateUser')BEGINPRINT 'Dropping Procedure UpdateUser'DROP Procedure dbo.UpdateUserENDGOPRINT 'Creating Procedure UpdateUser'GOCreate Procedure dbo.UpdateUser@loginName Varchar (20),@loginPassword Varchar (50),@loginAttempts Int,@emailAddress Varchar(25),@dataVersion Rowversion OutputAs/************************************************** ****************************** Name: dbo.UpdateUser** Desc: Updates an Application User instance**** Parameters:** Input** @loginName** @loginPassword** @loginAttempts** @emailAddress** @dataVersion. row version used for concurrency control.**** Output** @dataVersion. updated row version used for concurrencycontrol.**** Return** 0 for Success. Error code if any are encountered** 66661 if current row version doesn't match provided version** 66666 if expected row is not found**************************************************** *****************************/Set NoCount OnDeclare@err Int,@rowCount Int,@tranCount Int--Transaction HandlingSelect @tranCount = @@TRANCOUNTIf (@tranCount=0)Begin Tran LocalTranElseSave Tran LocalTranUpdatedbo.ApplicationUsersSetLoginPassword = @loginPassword,LoginAttempts = @loginAttempts,EmailAddress = @emailAddressWhereLoginName = @loginNameAndDataVersion = @dataVersion--Check for errors and rowCount (Should have updated 1 row)Select @err = @@ERROR, @rowCount = @@ROWCOUNTIf (@err != 0) GOTO ErrHandlerIf (@rowCount != 1) GOTO ConcurrencyHandler--Set dataversion output parameterSelect@dataVersion = DataVersionFromdbo.ApplicationUsersWhereLoginName = @loginName/*If we got this far then there were no errorsIf this proc started transaction then commit it,otherwise return and let caller handle transaction*/If (@TranCount = 0)Commit Tran LocalTranReturn 0/*Rollback local transaction if an error was encountered.Return code is used to communicate error number.*/--Handle Concurrency ErrorsConcurrencyHandler:Rollback Tran LocalTranIf Exists (Select * From dbo.ApplicationUsers where LoginName =@loginName)Return 66661 --Row version doesn't match provided versionElseReturn 66666 --Row not found--Handle Other ErrorsErrHandler:Rollback Tran LocalTranReturn @err --Return Err NumberGOPRINT 'Inserting Test Data...'--Add Test DataInsert Into dbo.ApplicationUsers(LoginName, LoginPassword, LoginAttempts, EmailAddress)Values('blackmamba', 'Pwd1', default, 'bm@DIVAS.com')Insert Into dbo.ApplicationUsers(LoginName, LoginPassword, LoginAttempts, EmailAddress)Values('GoGo', 'Pwd2', default, 'gogo@crazy88.com')GO/*Call UpdateUser Stored Proc with current rowversion*/Declare @retVal int, @rowvrsn rowversion--Get Current Row Versionselect @rowvrsn = DataVersion from dbo.ApplicationUsers where LoginName= 'blackmamba'Exec @retVal = dbo.UpdateUser @loginName = 'blackmamba', @loginPassword= 'UpdatedPwd', @loginAttempts = 0, @emailAddress = 'bm@DIVAS.com',@dataVersion = @rowvrsn outputPrint @retVal --Should be 0 for successGO/*Call UpdateUser Stored Proc with out of date rowversion (simulateupdate by other process)*/Declare @retVal int, @rowvrsn rowversion--Get Current Row Versionselect @rowvrsn = DataVersion from dbo.ApplicationUsers where LoginName= 'blackmamba'--Simulate update by other processUpdate dbo.ApplicationUsers Set LoginPassword = LoginPassword whereLoginName = 'blackmamba'--Update User with out of date RowversionExec @retVal = dbo.UpdateUser @loginName = 'blackmamba', @loginPassword= 'UpdatedPwdVersion2', @loginAttempts = 0, @emailAddress ='bm@DIVAS.com', @dataVersion = @rowvrsn outputPrint @retVal --Should be 66661 for rowversion mismatchGO/*Call UpdateUser Stored Proc with out of date rowversion (simulatedelete by other process)*/Declare @retVal int, @rowvrsn rowversion--Get Current Row Versionselect @rowvrsn = DataVersion from dbo.ApplicationUsers where LoginName= 'blackmamba'--Simulate delete by other processDelete From dbo.ApplicationUsers where LoginName = 'blackmamba'--Update User with out of date RowversionExec @retVal = dbo.UpdateUser @loginName = 'blackmamba', @loginPassword= 'UpdatedPwdVersion2', @loginAttempts = 0, @emailAddress ='bm@DIVAS.com', @dataVersion = @rowvrsn outputPrint @retVal --Should be 66666 for row deleted by other process
I am working on application developed in ASP.NET 2.0 that uses lots of stored procedures from the SQL Server 2000 backend database.When the app is under load you occasionally see incorrect data returned to the page after running stored procedures.
All the stored procedures have been tested and appear to be fine. it's as if under load the returned data from the stored procedures is getting 'mixed' with another concurrent session. Please let me know what could be the reason behind it
I have some code that I need to run every quarter. I have many that are similar to this one so I wanted to input two parameters rather than searching and replacing the values. I have another stored procedure that's executed from this one that I will also parameter-ize. The problem I'm having is in embedding a parameter in the name of the called procedure (exec statement at the end of the code). I tried it as I'm showing and it errored. I tried googling but I couldn't find anything related to this. Maybe I just don't have the right keywords. what is the syntax?
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[runDMQ3_2014LDLComplete] @QQ_YYYY char(7), @YYYYQQ char(8) AS begin SET NOCOUNT ON; select [provider group],provider, NPI, [01-Total Patients with DM], [02-Total DM Patients with LDL],
I have a stored procedure and in that I will be calling a stored procedure. Now, based on the parameter value I will get stored procedure name to be executed. how to execute dynamic sp in a stored rocedure
at present it is like EXECUTE usp_print_list_full @ID, @TNumber, @ErrMsg OUTPUT
I want to do like EXECUTE @SpName @ID, @TNumber, @ErrMsg OUTPUT
Hi,Sorry, this is a very easy question. I have to create a storedprocedure in a SQL SERVER Database.I have read lots on MSDN about the syntax of this stored procedure :ie.CREATE PROCEDURE spGetContctDetailsAS-- get everything out of contact tableSELECT * FROM tblContactbut I cannot find anywhere how to actually add this procedure, so thatit is accessable in my VB.NET program.What I am asking is : what screen do I type this into? Is it QueryAnalyzer, if so where?Its got me oh so confused. When I've got time i'll read all about SQLServer, but for this morning I need to know how to simply add thatStored Procedure to my database.Thanks LOADS for any help.
I have a MSSQL2000 box with a large database containing circa 150 SP's.I want to move the DB to another SQL machine, but many of the SP's havereferences to the name of the current machine. Is there any way tobatch edit the procedures to refer to the new server, disassociatingthe old machine completely?Tia,Graham
I am writing a sales managing software using C# in .NET 2005. The program was used to work properly with sql server 2000. I decided to write a "FILE Version" of sofware using sql server express 2005 , and detached db from 2000 , attaching it to 2005 using AttachDBFileName clause in connection string.
But the problem is when program executes something like this: EXEC [AddOrder] ... two rows inserted instead of one.and when I use server explorer of VS2005 to launch SP, it works fine. I should mention again that same code works correctly when I change connection string and force it to use sqlserver 2000.
I was using the SQL 2000 stored procedure wizard to create storedprocedures. I can create insert, delete and update SPs however I amnot able to create the select SP. The wizard does not offer the optionof selecting "select" type SP. thank you for your replyscompraj
I have this stored procedure that takes a few parameters like date andmerchant ID, and basically goes through a set of if-then statements to builda SQL SELECT string.When we upgraded from SQL Server 7.0 to 2000, the stored procedure stillworked from Query Analyzer, but not in BCP. It used to work in BCP justfine with 7.0. The error I get now is:SQLState = S1000, NativeError = 0Error = [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver]BCP host-files must containat least one columnWhat's really strange is, if I instruct the stored procedure to simply printthe SELECT string, then cut-and-paste it into the end of stored procedurecode (assigning it to the variable that already contains the SELECT string),then it works from BCP.Any help would be greatly appreciated.Aston
