Hi allI am having a SQL Server database of arround 110GB and 250 Users. Whatis best suited hardware requirements for handling of such a database. Iam having following requirements from the server:1. Feeding purpose : On which continously feeding is done by average200 users.2. Reporting purpose : on which average hundred of repords are runningat a time.Right now i am having two servers for both of the above said purposeswith the following configuration.Feeding ServerHPSERVER 370G43.2 Xeon Single processor3GB RAM1 SCSI 73GB 15000 RPM(OS & Transaction Log), 4 SCSI * 73GB with RAID 0(Data Files) and 2 IDE * 300GB (Backups)Reporting ServerBoard SE7520BD2V2 x XEON 3.2 GHz CPU 800 FSB with 2MB Cache4GB RAM3 SCSI * 73GB with RAID 0 (Data Files and Transaction Log), 2 SATA *300GB (Backups) , 1 80GB IDE(OS)I want to fullfill both of my requirements from a single . I want toknow what upgrades or changes I need to do in the configurationaccording to the load and performence on existing servers. Here is thetable of performence counters along with their values to show the loadand performence for both of the servers.ReportServer ValueFeedingServer ValueCounter Instance Avg. Min. Max. Avg.Min. Max.Pages/sec 0.081 0 8.001 0.020 1.993Avg. Disc Queue length _Total 18.658 13.592 51.89634.421 0 175.783% Processor Time _Total 36.841 5.469 64.45379.837 54.688 100Buffer Cache hit ratio 97.702 93.595 99.46397.41 77.261 99.989Checkpoint pages/sec 0 0 00 0 0Lazy writes/sec 1.243 0 30.003 14.2630 97.194Page life expectancy 17 4 8110 6 14Avg. DiskBytes/transfer _Total 37934.133 7903.004128427.747 53806.538 8025.801 141750.562Avg. DiskBytes/Read _Total 16737.419 8192 42895.86254228.822 8170.499 143489.965Avg. Disk Bytes/Write _Total 12298.494 0 6553611708.014 0 92842.667% Disk Time _Total 77.555 49.976 261.966 760.35612.534 4890.383Users Connections 17 17 18195 185 212Batch Requests/sec 0.859 0 2373.215 0 205.009Transactions/sec _Total 1.768 0 18.00159.314 3 241.814Page splits/sec 0 0 0 1.030 5.007Please suggest what should be the configuration for my new server.Should I consider buying an Dual Itanium Processor based system with 16Gigs of Ram and 8 Hard Disks in Raid 0. Or Should I consider buying aQuad Xeon Dual Core Processor based system. Or may be my existing HPserver can be upgraded to dual processor and 8 Gigs of Ram and 2-3 morehard disks? Pls recommend what should be the factors that sould beconsidered, guiding priciples and my approact to reach a decision.With Best RegardsParveen Beniwal
Hi, can anyone answer me this? I recently inherited a SQL Server database set up. The user database size is about 3 times as big as necessary - does this matter? Does it have an impact on performance and if so is there anything I can do to reduce the size? From what I have managed to gather so far you cannot use alter db to change the database to a smaller size than it was originally created at. If anyone can help it would be most appreciated!
I have a report that is a little wide, and when I export it to an Excel file it spans about 2 pages. I have it set to an 8.5 height and 11 width for printing in landscape on normal-sized paper. But is there a way to make sure that the report exports with the printing page break covering the entire width so that the report prints only one page across? The users don't want to resize in Excel before printing.
We are considering migrating our Oracle database over to SQLserver 7.0. I'd like to do some sizing estimates, but I have not been able find any methods for sizing SQL server 7.0 databases. There didn't seem to be any calculation guidlines or formulas in the manual or the online documentation. The only formulas I have found on the WEB are for version 6.5. Does anyone have (or know where I can find)formulas that are valid for sizing SQL server 7.0 databases?
Note: an archived message on this site referred to an attachment containing sizing formulas, but the attachment was not accesible.
We are designing a system using .NET/ASP.NET and SQL Server (2000 Standard as a customer requirement). The system will be hosted into 2 dedicated servers (an web/application and a db server) and we need to estimate the hardware requirements needed.
Could anyone help me on sizing this? Is there any literature on how to do this? I found some sizing web sites but I'd like to double check them. I already have some estimation on data storage size/growth based on some information I've got from the customer.
Hello I am sizing a database server for Business Objects Enterprise XI R2. In addition to housing this database we plan on consolodating a few other databases to this server. I am wondering what type of array I should be considering for these databases.
We are experiencing some contention of resources between our RDBMS and our OLAP environment; both SQL2005; so we are going to put the OLAP side of life onto another seperate box. Therefore I need to work out what sort of requirements we are going to need; and this is where i have no idea.
I have had a look at the HP sizers, however this is looking primarily at normal RDBMS setups rather than specifically for OLAP. Is there any specifics that I need to consider/nail down before working this out?
To give you an idea: We currently have 210 million rows in our main fact table, and each row is averaging about 330 bytes The size of our current OLAP database is only 4GB It appears as though we are currently getting anywhere between 6 and 20-30 concurrent users
Considering the above; I would have thought a dual core cpu setup (maybe x2) with 8-10GB of ram would have been the ticket? Now I have done a server sizing exercise for a normal SQL2005 installation; considering temp db on seperate spindles to the log and database tables etc; but what sort of considerations do I need to do for a server running SSAS?
Thanks in advance for any assistance anyone can offer on this front
HiI joined a project where 100,000 rows were added everyday. Now due toadditional customers the expectation is 2 million reocrds/day ie 10 GB worthof textfiles. We have to estimate the hard disk, memory, # of CPUs etc.Wewill have one yearworth of data in the db. Rest will be in tapes etc.We will be using WIN2000, SQL Server2000.- Any comparable server sizing willbe appreciated.1. Tohandle every day load, I thought that we will have a table for each day(pre created in the database )and have a view with union all selectingfromall these 365 tables. (This is the only way to partition in MSSQL Serverright?).2. The requirement is to populate datawarehouse tables with all the data.However there will be only inserts mostly but there can be updates too whichhappenned in the past 12 days.Hence we have to use the data from the last12 days and massage it etc and populate into datawarehouse tables.How can I do this so that I will have the datawarehouse tables with n-12days of data and I will alwys add the last 12 days data to it.Do you have any suggestions?Ragu
We are planning to deploy the MS Reporting Services. Unfortunately,there isn't much guidance on how to effectively size a server.Here are my questions:1) In an environment with 1 reporting server (hosting the reportingdata layer, application, and management layer) connecting to 1 or moreSQL servers (over 2 trunked 1Gbps switches connections), what is theconstraining resource when running large reports against a database ofsay 4GB in size? CPU, RAM, DISK, or Network speed on the ReportingServer? Or the Data hosting SQL server? Or does it depend on code?2) If I have a Duel Core CPU, do I buy 1 CPU license. MS had respondedto the HyperThreading as 2 virtual CPUs with the statement that you buyCPU licenses based on socket count effectively. This would imply thatif I buy a 4 Duel Core AMD Opteron Proliant 585 (8 CPU cores in 4packages / sockets), I can run MS Reporting Services Standard Edition.Is that true?Any input or direction would be appreciated.Paul V.
I've been fixing some issues lately where weekly maintenance has been causing logs to grow and filling disks.
Is there any rule of thumb for allocating log space for doing reorgs and rebuilds in a worst case scenario? I'm thinking 3x the largest database size?
I've been watching them run on databases in the range of 50GB where the logs are growing well over that for rebuilds or even reorgs. Once you have a few databases like this on a server, you can suddenly eat through a lot of disk space just for holding logs during maintenance.
Hello, I'm looking for a sizing Excel (or any other format) file, that permits me evaluate the size of my sql server database, actually I have one excel file for Oracle, where I only put the expected # of rows, the average size of the columns, and other few data, and I can get the size (in Megabytes) of a table or an Index.
I've got a question that I can't seem to find an answer for, I was hoping someone here might be able to point me in the right direction. I've set up a stored procedure that will email someone if any entries are added to a table . However, the output is garbled looking (see below)
Client Number SSN Client Name Old SD New SD ------------- ----------- ---------------------------------------- -------- -------- 800901 899-34-3482 John Smith 04/20/20 05/01/20 400909 144-23-0029 John Smith 04/09/20 04/11/20 447788 445-89-9967 kjl;j;j 04/05/20 04/12/20 300099 234-90-7815 John Johnson 04/08/20 04/15/20
What's happened is the client name field is too wide, so the New SD field kicks down to the next line. I'd like to clean this up. Is there a way I can either increase the length of the row before it moves to the next line, or can I re-size the client name field to match the size of the data. In other words, cli_name_vc is declared as a varchar(40). If the longest name that comes up in the query is 18 characters long, can I re-size the output so that it does not take up 40 characters?
Hi, I have an application developed using VWD and sqlserver express database. The express database is turning out to be small in size and we need to migrate to larger sqlserver 2005 database. What are the steps for this migration, please list in detail. Regards, Sandy
We have been using Sql Server 2005 Compact Edition 3.1 RDA synchronization method successfully on Sql Server 2000 database. Recently we moved the database to Sql Server 2005, sync doesn't work anymore, it just hangs on one table. On further investigation, we found out that it's the index on that table that causes this. We removed the index, it works fine. We are wondering the root cause, removing the index is not a solution for us. Any thoughts?. Thanks.
if there is any way to accurately size a single server using SSIS. The server will be a virtual machine. The data being loaded will be approximately 200 MB per load with loading to a 150 GB database on a separate server.
I am converting an old Crystal Reports environment to 2005 Reporting Services. I've seen the basic memory requirements for the SSRS programs themselves, but I was wondering if there are any other guides available that will help me size the H/W based on anticipated users and reports.
I need to manage the height of an horizontal range bar chart inside a SSRS 2012 report.
In my report, I've a filter to read a particular data set. So, I could select five data rows or ten data rows or twenty data rows and so on. I'd like to maintain fixed the height of the horizontal bars while the number of data rows changes.
I am in the process of formulating recommendations with respect to the purchase of additional storage for our current SQL 2012 SharePoint (2013) instance. My recommendation is to purchase separate storage (i.e, 15k disks) for the TempDB and Tlogs respectively (two sets of raid 10 disks). Currently, this server is hosting several instances, including SP, using two arrays (one for database and the other for Tlogs).
I am attempting to find information/recommendations on how to go about projecting the amount of storage for each of these while factoring in for growth.
Additional Details:
how to best formulate a reasonable estimate. Our largest content database belongs to IT and is currently ~80GB. That said, this is currently an outlier. The remaining content databases are less than 10GB (most are less than 2-3 GB). However, SharePoint will be used for digital document imaging in addition to, eventually, replacing file shares as our primary document storage medium once we roll it out.
Our current tempDB is ~400MB, but the instance was recently started a few days ago, as we had to failover to our backup server for hardware maintenance. I do not have any historical data on TempDB growth at this time. Also, I don't know how useful this would be given we have not fully deployed yet.
I know the standard Microsoft recommendation is to make the pagefile at least 1.5 to 3 times larger then the amount of physical memory. However, if you're talking about a server with lots of memory such as 16GB or 32GB, would following this rule be unnecessary. With SQL 2000 running on Windows 2000 Server or Windows Server 2003 I typically see pagefile usage no more then 12% for a 2GB pagefile. Anything over 15% means I need to look at other indicators to see if a memory bottleneck has developed. If I have 32GB of physical memory and make the pagefile only 1.5 x 32GB I have a 48GB pagefile. 10% of this is 4.8GB, which I would hope I never see consumed.
Hello,If I backup and restore an express database to sql server 2005 standard, will there still be limitations in regards to the database size, cpu...etc.? Thanks,Jon
Do you now, How can I move database with datas to release version of sql server? Procedores backup/restore can't help becouse of unsuported version database.
I'm really new to the whole database deal (as well as VB.net) - specifically with the capabilities surrounding VB and SQL Server 2005. My question is open to any recommendations...
What I have is an application that a user uses to create 'new' products. They are presented a form to enter the information regarding the product they wish to create. They enter the details of the product and also locate an image that represents the product, too. Currently, this application saves the product information (including binary image data) into a SQL Server 2005 Express Edition database. This application and database reside on a client pc. What I need to do is to be able save updated and newly created product data into a file of some sort. That file will make its way to a memory stick (USB) and then be transported to a 'field' machine. Quite simply, what is the best way to do this? Are there walk-throughs on this sort of thing? The target database is also SQL Server 2005. I thought I'd post this question on here to get the best design ideas... Any help would be greatly appreciated.
I am looking for some recommendations for memory sizing and options for a SQL 2000 Cluster. This is a two node cluster built on Windows 2003 ENT SP1 (x86). Both the nodes have the following hardware:
- 4 x Dual Core AMD Processors - 16 GB Memory - EMC Shared Disk
We are running six SQL 2000 instances and don't expect each of these instances to use more than 1.7 GB of memory. All these instances are going to support BizTalk 2004 Databases. I already have /PAE enabled on the nodes. I am looking for the following answers:
- Do I need to enable AWE on all the instances even if the instances ? Currently, we don't have that enabled and we have seen some issues regarding excessive paging even when there is physical memory available. The DBAs think that we don't need to enable AWE. I am bit confused on this one.
- We normally run 3 instances on each node and would like size the cluster in such a way that it can take six instances in case of a node failure
I recently upgraded to SQL Server 2005. My databases are stable and functioning perfectly. However, these databases are using the 32-bit version of SQL Server. The servers are going to be upgraded to 64-bit processors and new Server 2003 64-bit OS's.
Everything I have been able to find says that it is a simple process of backing up the databases in the 32-bit environment and restoring them in the 64-bit environment.
Could it really be that easy? I am looking for someone who has done this to provide any "heads up" commentary on what to look out for during that process. Can anyone provide some information on this process?
I am having a problem with connecting to SQL Server 2005 database from Office Business Scorecard Manager 2005 (the connection string i am using is: provider=SQLOLEDB;Data source=server_name; Initial catalog=database_name). But the connection failed. Would please any experts here shed me any light on what is the problem and how to fix it then? As there is no any forum for Office Business Scrorecard manager 2005. Therefore I post my thread here as it is related to the connection to SQL Server 2005 database engine, thought here is the best place for this question.
Thank you very in advance for your kind advices and help. And I am looking forward to hearing from you soon.
I recently added a new user to my database. Now I want to delete that user, but I keep getting the error above. What do I need to do to delete my recently added user?
Hi all (newbie @ asp.net)(oldie @ ASP 3)What is the purpose of using an attached MDF database files in the App_Data folder on a web site as to importing it into the SQL server directly or creating it on the SQL server. Does a mdf database attached file purely use the SQL server as a connection interface.Is it something similiar to DSN(ODBC) Connections for ms access databases.
