Below query. its getting more time to exec and got deadlock. So, query to avoid deadlock.
SELECT m1.Value AS InterfaceName, m1.MessageDateTime, m2.GroupId, COUNT(mError.Id) AS ErrorCount
FROM (
SELECT m1.Value, MAX(m1.MessageDateTime) as MessageDateTime FROM Message m1
WHERE m1.TypeId = 9 AND (m1.Value LIKE 'F02' )
GROUP BY m1.Value
[Code] ....
Here's a really weird one for any SQL Server gurus out there...We have observed (SQL Server 2000) scenarios where a stored procedurewhich(a) begins a transaction(b) inserts some rows into a table(c) re-queries another table using a subquery which references theinserted table (correlated or not)will deadlock itself at point (c), even when it is the only task onthe server.[I use the term 'deadlock' because I can't think of anything elseappropriate, even though, as stated, this is the ONLY task executing,so this isn't a classical deadlock situation]A typical deadlocking scenario would be (assume insert_table is thetable into which some rows are being inserted)begin transactioninsert insert_table(col....) select (col....) from some_other_table/* this following query will deadlock and never complete */select some_other_table.colfrom some_other_tablewhere not exists (select *from insert_tablewhere some_other_table.col = insert_table.col )Whereas if the offending second query in the sequence is rewritten asa joine.gselect some_other_table.colfrom some_other_tableleft join insert_tableon some_other_table.col = insert_table.colwhere insert_table.col is nullthe query will not deadlock.If the subquery is an aggregate function, a deadlock will also notoccur.If the transaction is committed prior to executing the blocking query,then it will not block (hardly surprising; if it did, there'd be majorproblems with SQL Server!).Note that this is a canonical case of a much more complex SP, and thatsimplified test cases often will not deadlock; you need a significantamount of data, typically 30,000 rows or more to see the problem. Theblocking query is, in real life, used to drive a subsequent tableinsert operation, but this is not relevant to the problem.We conclude that there is some problem, possibly involving cataloguecontention, if a temporary table must be created in a subquery withina transaction in a stored procedure, and if the subquery involvesreferences to a table for which locks have been acquired.Note that the lock timeout will never trigger and a deadlock victim isnever chosen, presumably because the deadlock occurs entirely withinthe same SPID.Locking hints and transaction isolation level setting does not affectthe result. Note also that the exact same queries, executed as a TSQLbatch, do not deadlock; you must place them in a stored procedure.Recovery mode for the database is SIMPLE, and the problem is portableacross databases; it can also be exhibited with MSDE/2000, and isindependent of whether or not the database server is the local machineor not.Has anyone else experienced this problem and/or know of a workaround,other than those mentioned here?. It does look awfully like a bug withSQL Server, since a single task should never be able to deadlockitself, surely.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI am trying to get a date diff in a named calculation using inner join I am getting
Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression. #
I have checked online and have been able to get some of my codes right by using the where condition in place of the inner join, but I have not been able to work around the datediff one
(select
DATEDIFF(day,TDate,[DID])
FROM [dv].[dbo].[Dail] as D
inner join
[dv].[dbo].[ANT] as A
on
a.AID = d.AID)
I am attempting to Insert multiple rows in a table by passing DataTable to a Stored Proc. My code is the same as the examples on the net, however when I execute the code I receive the Subquery returned more than 1 value error.
I first created up a User-Defined Table Type
My stored proc is as follows:
ALTER PROCEDURE [KCC].[Insert_MaterialJobMtl]
@MtlTblMaterialType READONLY
AS
BEGIN
Set NOCOUNT ON;
[code]....
I am getting following deadlock message. What is happening in below deadlock?? Also what can I do to get rid of this deadlock?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have four tables: Customer (CustomerId INT, CountyId INT), County (CountyId INT), Search(SearchId INT), and SearchCriteria (SearchCriteriaId INT, SearchId INT, CountyId INT, [others not related to this]).
I want to search Customer based off of the Search record, which could have multiple SearchCriteria records. However, if there aren't any SearchCriteria records with CountyId populated for a given Search, I want it to assume to get all Customer records, regardless of CountyId.
Right now, I'm doing it this way.
DECLARE @SearchId INT = 100
SELECT * FROM Customer WHERE
CountyId IN
(
SELECT CASE WHEN EXISTS(SELECT CountyId FROM SearchCriteria WHERE SearchId = @SearchId)
THEN SearchCriteria.CountyId
[Code] .....
This works; it just seems cludgy. Is there a more elegant way to do this?
I have the following table
Memberid int
submemberid int
example
MemberId SubMemberId
1 2
2 3
1 4
3 5
2 6
7 8
Each member may supervise more than one member under him (whom I call submember)
and then each sub member may also supervise more than one member under him
I need to be able to select a specific member for example whose id is 1 and consequently all his sub members should be selected whose also all submembers should be selected and so
on
I do not know how to do this here is my trial:
ALTER Procedure dbo.MemberReports;1
@MemberMaskId nvarchar(8)
As
SET NOCOUNT ON
Begin
Declare @Exists Int -- Return Value
-- Select * from MembersTree where MemberId = @memId or MemberId = subMemberId
SELECT
MembersTree.memberid,
MembersTree.submemberid,
MembersTree1.memberid
FROM
MembersTree
INNER JOIN
MembersTree MembersTree1
ON MembersTree.Submemberid
= MembersTree1.memberid
WHERE
MembersTree.MemberId = @memId
If @@rowcount = 0 -- No Record returned
Select @Exists = 0
Else
Select @Exists = 1
Return @Exists
End
Please help,
Thanks
hello friends.. I am newbie for sql server...I having a problem when executing this procedure .... ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[spgetvalues] @Uid intASBEGIN SET NOCOUNT ON; select DATEPART(year, c.fy)as fy, (select contribeamount from wh_contribute where and contribename like 'Retire-Plan B-1% JRF' ) as survivorship, (select contribeamount from wh_contribute where and contribename like 'Gross Earnings' and ) as ytdgross, (select contribeamount from wh_contribute where and contribename like 'Retire-Plan B-1.5% JRP') as totalcontrib, from wh_contribute c where c.uid=@Uid Order by fy Asc .....what is the wrong here?? " Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression."please reply asap...
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am getting 2 resultsets depending on conditon, In the secondconditon i am getting the above error could anyone help me..........CREATE proc sp_count_AllNewsPapers@CustomerId intasdeclare @NewsId intset @NewsId = (select NewsDelId from NewsDelivery whereCustomerId=@CustomerId )if not exists(select CustomerId from NewsDelivery whereNewsPapersId=@NewsId)beginselect count( NewsPapersId) from NewsPapersendif exists(select CustomerId from NewsDelivery whereNewsPapersId=@NewsId)beginselect count(NewsDelId) from NewsDelivery whereCustomerid=@CustomeridendGO
View 3 Replies View RelatedIs there a way to send out an email woth deadlock information (victim query, winner query, process id's and resources on which the deadlock occurred) as soon as a deadlock occurs in a database or at instance level?I currently has trace flag 1222 turned on. And also created an alert that send me an email whenever a deadlock occurs. but it just says that a deadlock occurred and I log into sql server error log and review the information.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am getting an error as
Msg 512, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression.
while running the following query.
SELECT DISTINCT EmployeeDetails.FirstName+' '+EmployeeDetails.LastName AS EmpName,
LUP_FIX_DeptDetails.DeptName AS CurrentDepartment,
LUP_FIX_DesigDetails.DesigName AS CurrentDesignation,
LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails.ProjectName AS CurrentProject,
ManagerName=(SELECT E.FirstName+' '+E.LastName
FROM EmployeeDetails E
INNER JOIN LUP_EmpProject
ON E.Empid=LUP_EmpProject.Empid
INNER JOIN LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails
ON LUP_EmpProject.Projectid = LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails.Projectid
WHERE LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails.Managerid = E.Empid)
FROM EmployeeDetails
INNER JOIN LUP_EmpDepartment
ON EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpDepartment.Empid
INNER JOIN LUP_FIX_DeptDetails
ON LUP_EmpDepartment.Deptid=LUP_FIX_DeptDetails.Deptid
AND LUP_EmpDepartment.Date=(SELECT TOP 1 LUP_EmpDepartment.Date
FROM LUP_EmpDepartment
WHERE EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpDepartment.Empid
ORDER BY LUP_EmpDepartment.Date DESC)
INNER JOIN LUP_EmpDesignation
ON EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpDesignation.Empid
INNER JOIN LUP_FIX_DesigDetails
ON LUP_EmpDesignation.Desigid=LUP_FIX_DesigDetails.Desigid
AND LUP_EmpDesignation.Date=(SELECT TOP 1 LUP_EmpDesignation.Date
FROM LUP_EmpDesignation
WHERE EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpDesignation.Empid
ORDER BY LUP_EmpDesignation.Date DESC)
INNER JOIN LUP_EmpProject
ON EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpProject.Empid
AND LUP_EmpProject.StartDate=(SELECT TOP 1 LUP_EmpProject.StartDate
FROM LUP_EmpProject
WHERE EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpProject.Empid
ORDER BY LUP_EmpProject.StartDate DESC)
INNER JOIN LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails
ON LUP_EmpProject.Projectid=LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails.Projectid
WHERE EmployeeDetails.Empid=1
PLEASE HELP.................
Hi,
I've running the below query for months ans suddenly today started getting the following error :"Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression."
Any ideas as to why??
SELECT t0.DocNum, t0.Status, t0.ItemCode, t0.Warehouse, t0.OriginNum, t0.U_SOLineNo, ORDR.NumAtCard, ORDR.CardCode, OITM_1.U_Cultivar,
RDR1.U_Variety,
(SELECT OITM.U_Variety
FROM OWOR INNER JOIN
WOR1 ON OWOR.DocEntry = WOR1.DocEntry INNER JOIN
OITM INNER JOIN
OITB ON OITM.ItmsGrpCod = OITB.ItmsGrpCod ON WOR1.ItemCode = OITM.ItemCode
WHERE (OITB.ItmsGrpNam = 'Basic Fruit') AND (OWOR.DocNum = t0.DocNum)) AS Expr1, OITM_1.U_Organisation, OITM_1.U_Commodity,
OITM_1.U_Pack, OITM_1.U_Grade, RDR1.U_SizeCount, OITM_1.U_InvCode, OITM_1.U_Brand, OITM_1.U_PalleBase, OITM_1.U_Crt_Pallet,
OITM_1.U_LabelType, RDR1.U_DEPOT, OITM_1.U_PLU, RDR1.U_Trgt_Mrkt, RDR1.U_Wrap_Type, ORDR.U_SCCode
FROM OWOR AS t0 INNER JOIN
ORDR ON t0.OriginNum = ORDR.DocNum INNER JOIN
RDR1 ON ORDR.DocEntry = RDR1.DocEntry AND t0.U_SOLineNo - 1 = RDR1.LineNum INNER JOIN
OITM AS OITM_1 ON t0.ItemCode = OITM_1.ItemCode
WHERE (t0.Status <> 'L')
Thanks
Jacquues
Hi guys,
A have a problem that I need understand.... I have 2 server with the same configuration...
SERVER01:
-----------------------------------------------------
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2191 (Intel IA-64)
Mar 27 2006 11:51:52
Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation
Enterprise Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: Service Pack 1)
sp_dboption 'BB_XXXXX'
The following options are set:
-----------------------------------
trunc. log on chkpt.
auto create statistics
auto update statistics
********************************
SERVER02:
-----------------------------------------------------
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2191 (Intel IA-64)
Mar 27 2006 11:51:52
Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation
Enterprise Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: Service Pack 1)
sp_dboption 'BB_XXXXX'
The following options are set:
-----------------------------------
trunc. log on chkpt.
auto create statistics
auto update statistics
OK, the problem is that if a run the below query in server01, i get error 512:
Msg 512, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression.
But, if run the same query in the server02, the query work fine -.
I know that I can use IN, EXISTS, TOP, etc ... but I need understand this behavior.
Any idea WHY?
SELECT dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.dt_saldo,
dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.cd_indice_opf,
dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.cd_classificacao,
dbo.opf_movimento_operacao.ds_tipo_transacao ds_tipo_transacao_movimento ,
dbo.opf_header_operacao.ds_tipo_transacao ds_tipo_transacao_header,
'SD' ds_status_operacao,
dbo.opf_header_operacao.ds_tipo_opcao ,
dbo.opf_header_operacao.id_empresa,
dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.ic_empresa_cliente,
0 vl_entrada_compra_ctro ,0 vl_entrada_compra_premio,
0 vl_entrada_venda_ctro , 0 vl_entrada_venda_premio,
0 vl_saida_compra_ctro, 0 vl_saida_compra_premio,
0 vl_saida_venda_ctro, 0 vl_saida_venda_premio,
0 vl_lucro , 0 vl_prejuizo, 0 vl_naoexec_contrato,
0 vl_naoexec_premio,
sum(dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.vl_aprop_ganho) vl_aprop_ganho,
sum(dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.vl_aprop_perda) vl_aprop_perda,
sum(dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.vl_rever_ganho) vl_rever_ganho,
sum(dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.vl_rever_perda) vl_rever_perda,
sum(dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.vl_irrf) vl_irrf
FROM dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx,
dbo.opf_header_operacao ,
dbo.opf_movimento_operacao
WHERE dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.dt_saldo = '6-29-2007 0:0:0.000'
and ( dbo.opf_header_operacao.no_contrato = dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.no_contrato )
and ( dbo.opf_header_operacao.no_contrato = dbo.opf_movimento_operacao.no_contrato )
and ( dbo.opf_movimento_operacao.dt_pregao = (select (o.dt_pregao) from dbo.opf_movimento_operacao o
where o.no_contrato = dbo.opf_movimento_operacao.no_contrato and o.dt_pregao <='6-28-2007 0:0:0.000' ) )
and (dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.ic_tipo_saldo = 'S')
group by dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.dt_saldo,
dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.cd_indice_opf,
dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.cd_classificacao,
dbo.opf_movimento_operacao.ds_tipo_transacao,
dbo.opf_header_operacao.ds_tipo_transacao ,
ds_status_operacao,
dbo.opf_header_operacao.ds_tipo_opcao ,
dbo.opf_header_operacao.id_empresa,
dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.ic_empresa_cliente
Thanks
Nilton Pinheiro
I am trying to add the results of both of these queries together:
The purpose of the first query is to find the number of nulls in the TimeZone column.
Query 1:
SELECT COUNT(*) - COUNT (TimeZone)
FROM tablename
The purpose of the second query is to find results in the AAST, AST, etc timezones.
Query 2:
SELECT COUNT (TimeZone)
FROM tablename
WHERE TimeZone NOT IN ('EST', 'MST', 'PST', 'CST')
Note: both queries produce a whole number with no decimals. Ran individually both queries produce accurate results. However, what I would like is one query which produced a single INT by adding both results together. For example, if Query 1 results to 5 and query 2 results to 10, I would like to see a single result of 15 as the output.
What I came up with (from research) is:
SELECT ((SELECT COUNT(*) - COUNT (TimeZone)
FROM tablename) + (SELECT COUNT (TimeZone)
FROM tablename
WHERE TimeZone NOT IN ('EST', 'MST', 'PST', 'CST'))
I get a msq 102, level 15, state 1 error.
I also tried
SELECT ((SELECT COUNT(*) - COUNT (TimeZone)
FROM tablename) + (SELECT COUNT (TimeZone)
FROM tablename
WHERE TimeZone NOT IN ('EST', 'MST', 'PST', 'CST')) as IVR_HI_n_AK_results
but I still get an error. For the exact details see:
[URL]
NOTE: the table in query 1 and query 2 are the same table. I am using T-SQL in SQL Server Management Studio 2008.
Hi Guys.
I just want to ask some insights on SQL Server Deadlock and what is the best way to handle deadlock in asp.net?
Or something like a Try... Catch.. statement to handle the error?
Please advice. Thanks in advance.
We've got a 3rd party application that periodically runs SQL commands throughout the day. We've been getting issues with this application showing a sql error:
Transaction (Process ID 71) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction.
In checking the processes on SQL Server, there were a lot, and process ID 71 was actually hitting a completely different database.
Is there a way to streamline how SQL Server handles processes, and what's the limit at any given time?
I have some ASP.NET C# code which executes a stored procedure in SQL Server via the SqlCommand and SqlConnection classes.
One of the stored procedures that gets executed is giving the error: "Transaction (Process ID 272) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction." This only happens occassionally.
Is there a way to get around this in my ASP.Net application? One thing I tried is ensuring that no 2 users entered the stored procedure concurrently:object synclock = new object() ;
lock (synclock) {
// execute SQL stored procedure
...
} This did not solve the problem, and I'm not even sure if that is the correct implementation to ensure sequential execution of the stored procedure.
I'm investigating my production server because there appears a deadlock every day. So, in SQL Profiler, I use the the Deadlock graph to capture the trace in a file.
When I click on the textdata to see the graph an error appears:
- Failed to initialize deadlock control.
Cannot find process victim in process list.
I also get the following error from another deadlock:
- Failed to initialize deadlock control.
Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
I stopped my trace, so this can not be the problem.
Does anybody knows why I can't see the graph?
I also captured the trace in a table and then used the following query to see it in xml:
select convert(xml,textdata)
from TableName
This works fine.
HI,
I have a framewrok that runs tests and keeps updating the status of the tests to the DB. They are approx 20 tests whose status will be updated simultaneously. Recently i have seen the follwoing error
{"Transaction (Process ID 84) was deadlocked on lock | communication buffer resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction."}
I am using SQL server 2005. Any suggestions?
Thank you
Hi Guys,
I have one situation. I need to find out the processes which are all in deadlock state. I my figure out that SQL server maintains the process details in sysprocesses table.
Can any one please help me, Whether this is the table which contains deadlock details. If not where are they stored and How to kill that process ?
Thanks & Regards,
Senthil
There are a few features in the new SQL Server - Reporting Services that I really need in production. I have tested everything and it works great. I am running the CTP version since Microsoft is saying they aren't releasing the release version until 3rd quarter 2008.
Since Microsoft won't sell SQL 2008 until 3rd quarter, can I run the CTP in production until the release and then purchase SQL 2008?
Jim
Hello - does anyone have experience w/SQL Server 2005 in a virtual environment? I'm considering this for a production environment but not sure if performance will suffer. Our databases will have a lot of writing but not too much reading. A SSRS solution is currently the only app. connecting to the SQL db. Max users to server at any given time will be very low (~10 users max). But the databases are pulling in data from other, outside multiple data sources on a daily basis.
Any pointers to documentation or any advice?
Thanks,
A Brown
I want to set an alert for a specific table whenever an event hascaused a deadlock to occur on the table.I understand how to set up an alert. But I don't know which errornumber to use for the New Alert error number property for a deadlock.Or how to specify a deadlock on a specific table.Thanks,DW
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi there,
We have lately experianced a strange problem with our SQL Server 2005 x64 (SP2) that is NOT consistent but when it happens it happens on the same time.
Almost every night at 03:30 one of our databases (not all) seems to be down or locked. When i have a look at the order table in this database I can see that we have stopped recieving orders after 03:30. Two hours later (05:30) I can see the following error each minute in the error log until we reboot the server:
All schedulers on Node 0 appear deadlocked due to a large number of worker threads waiting on LCK_M_IS. Process Utilization 0%%.
As we have a maintenance job running at 03:30 it feels like this is the problem. The job performs the following tasks: "Check Database Integrity -> Rebuild Index -> Reorganize Index"
When i look at the history of the job it looks like it's not completed and only the "Check Database Integrity" task was runned. No error message here either.
Also when i look in the error log i can see that the Maintenance job is started but never ended. Worth to notice is that I get the follwoing info in the log after the start-message:
Configuration option 'user options' changed from 0 to 0. Run the RECONFIGURE statement to install.
Also, when i run this job manually daytime it works great!
Anyone having any idees on this? Is it possible to track this even more? I'm tired of restarting the server 03:30 in the morning =)
Thanks
Jon
Hello!
Recently, I set up server with Windows Web Server 2008 RC1, SQL 2008 Express beta, .NET 3.5, IIS 7.
I'm running ASP.NET web application with SQL database. Everything works fine until the first application state on the server expires. After that, any postback that starts a new application state on the server and connects to the database, results in the following error:
Failed to generate a user instance of SQL Server due to a failure in starting the process for the user instance. The connection will be closed.
Is this a bug that will be fixed in release of Windows / SQL or am I doing something wrong?
Many thanks for help,
Jan
Dead lock is coming in select query in application because of index. It is identified after enabling trace in database and identified by reading deadlock xml file. After index removal, deadlock is not coming in same query. But it is affecting query's performance slightly. Is it correct way to remove index if dead lock is coming because of index?
View 3 Replies View RelatedThere are a series of traces of transactions for essentially the same units of work. Each includes a retrieving the same table "Select" from the database. The first 4 transactions ran concurrently. The last one ran about 7 minutes later with no other concurrent transactions.
The elapsed times for the database accesses for each of the first 4 is significantly higher than the last one.
Can you think of any database optimazation that might improve this?
Are there any utilities available than can be used for stand-alone testing of SQL Server database performance?
E.G. they would measure response time for reading/writing large/small amounts of canned data once/multiple times with concurrent/nonconcurrent access.
SQL Server Database is on 2000.I am not sure about the ISOLATION level in the Java code.
Basically I am new to SQL Sever....Please ans the above questions and provide me the direction to proceed on these questions
Hi all,
New to this so please be patient and please help.
I have developed an SQL 2005 Express command line option install for our company which has been working seamlessly for the last 18 months.
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms144259.aspx
I downloaded the €œMicrosoft SQL Server 2008 Express CTP, February 2008€? from http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=749BD760-F404-4D45-9AC0-D7F1B3ED1053&displaylang=en
I simply replaced the 2005 file €œSQLEXPR.EXE€? with the 2008 file €œ€?, recompiled the installation and tested only for it to fail. I than read the 2008 books online and noted the change in command line options.
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=19DB0B42-A5B2-456F-9C5C-F295CDD58D7A&displaylang=en
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms144259(SQL.100).aspx
I then changed the command line to suit the Microsoft 2008 books online, recompiled the installation and tested only for it to fail once more.
Interestingly I tested the install from the default GUI and at the point of adding the €œsa€? login credentials it fails to allow the installation to proceed. Strangely by selecting the windows authentication credentials, €œnext€? than €œback€? it now allows me to add the €œsa€? login credentials and continues to install correctly as required.
I hope I have explained this clearly enough.
1. Is this a bug in the €œMicrosoft SQL Server 2008 CTP, February 2008€? installation?
2. If so is this causing the command line install options to fail?
3. How do I obtain a version of €œMicrosoft SQL Server 2008 Express€? that will work installing from the command line?
Thanks in advance.
We have around 5 SP’s which are inserting data into Table A,and these will run in parallel.From the temp tables in the SP,data will be loaded to Table A. We are getting deadlock here.No Begin and End Transaction used in the stored procedure.
What could be done to avoid deadlock.
Hello,
Here is the below query I am running at server A and getting this below error.
If I am running the same query in Server B and running fine without any error.
My question is do I need to do any server configuration?. Or any solution for this issue.
I really appreciate your help.
Thanks,
Ravii
UPDATE Leap.dbo.CIB
SET credit_status = c.credit_status
FROM DNT02.oesd.dbo.credit_line c
WHERE c.effective_date = (SELECT MAX(c1.effective_date)
FROM DNT02.oesd.dbo.credit_line c1
WHERE c.account_num = c1.account_num
)
AND Leap.dbo.CIB.account_num = c.account_num
Server: Msg 8180, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Statement(s) could not be prepared.
Server: Msg 107, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
The column prefix 'c' does not match with a table name or alias name used in the query.
Original code (works in Sql Server 2000 but has error in Sql Server 2005) --
AND A_ED.EFFDT <= SUBSTRING(CONVERT(CHAR,GETDATE(),121), 1, 10))
Error message in Sql Server 2005 --
Server: Msg 8180, Level 16, State 1, Line 38
Statement(s) could not be prepared.
Server: Msg 107, Level 16, State 1, Line 38
The column prefix 'Tbl1001' does not match with a table name or alias name used in the query.
Corrected code --
AND SUBSTRING(CONVERT(CHAR,A_ED.EFFDT,121), 1, 10) <= SUBSTRING(CONVERT(CHAR,GETDATE(),121), 1, 10))
Hi, the following query works in Oracle, how do I do it in SQL Server? Thanks.
UPDATE table1 a SET a.newid =
(SELECT b.newid
FROM table2 b
WHERE a.id = b.id)
Basically, if table 1 and 2 have the same value in the "id" column, then I update the "newid" column in table a to match that of "newid" in table b.
Hi guys,
I am trying to perform the following update:
update Table1 set Field1 = (select Field1 from Table2) where Table1.Field2 = Table2.Field2 (suppose that Field2 is PK)
but it seems it won't work on SQL Server Compact Edition!
The problem is that I want to update Table1 with Table2 records
I have the following table:
Table1
1 'someName' 'SomeLastName'
2 'someName1' 'SomeLastName1'
3 'someName2' 'SomeLastName2'
4 'someName3' 'SomeLastName3'
5 'someName4' 'SomeLastName4'
6 'someName5' 'SomeLastName5'
and another table
Table2
1 'someChangedName' 'someChangedLastName'
2 'someChangedName1' 'someChangedLastName1'
3 'someChangedName2' 'someChangedLastName2'
4 'someChangedName3' 'someChangedLastName3'
5 'someChangedName4' 'someChangedLastName4'
6 'someChangedName5' 'someChangedLastName5'
and I want to perform an update of table1 based on the table2 records that table1 to become:
Table1
1 'someName' 'SomeLastName'
2 'someName1' 'SomeLastName1'
3 'someName2' 'SomeLastName2'
4 'someName3' 'SomeLastName3'
5 'someName4' 'SomeLastName4'
6 'someName5' 'SomeLastName5'
I hope that I was clear enough .
thanks.