SQL Server 2008 :: Merge Replication - Replacing A Subscriber
Mar 4, 2015
We have a central office with a SQL2005SP4 server (yeah, I know... old as heck) that's the main database and it has multiple subscribers in regional offices. Well... one of the regional offices server is failing, and it needs to be replace.
The original server is an ancient Win2003 86x
The Server team will build a new Win2008r2 64x, and use the same name and IP address
And I'm tasked with the SQL part.
I'll be installing the same version/patch of SQL, but 64x instead, and migrate all databases, including the system databases.
How do I handle replication? Do I need to reintialize from scratch? or can I just use the backup as a starting point?
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Nov 6, 2015
For study effect, can I configure merge replication using just one SQL Server Instance?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 27, 2015
i have replication setup and working, there are 3 subscribers and now i want to add a 4th one. is it ok if i just add the subscriber and reinitialize replication?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 15, 2015
When creating the snapshot I didn't choose the option copy non-clustered indexes. I created some indexes manually on subscriber database. Replication failed later with some issue.
so reinitialized with new snapshot but all the indexes are gone from the subscriber database.
How to keep the indexes without dropping from subscriber database whenever we reinitialized with snapshot
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 14, 2015
I am getting the error The transaction log for database 'ReplicationDB' is full due to 'LOG_BACKUP'.log_reuse_wait_desc from sys.databases is showing logbackup
The database is subscribed database. We configured transactional replication. But the transactional replication is getting errors and failed. Is there relation b/n this replication failures and log growth in subscriber db?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 6, 2015
I have documentation in the form of extended properties for tables which are subscribers in a replication scheme. The documentation describes the tables in reference to their replication scheme. I don't want to apply them to the source and have them published.I can't apply the extended properties receiving the error, 'don't have permission' yet I am DB creator on all systems. The theory is that I can't modify the subscription. Which makes sense.Can I turn off the replication, apply the extended properties, then turn on replication without causing harm?
View 0 Replies
View Related
Sep 6, 2001
SQL Server 7.0 SP3
I am using the "Pull Subscription Wizard" to set up merge replication. I go through all the steps of the wizard and then I hit "Finish" at the end. When it gets to the third step (Creating the Subscription), I get the old:
__________________________________________________ _________
mmc.exe has generated errors and will by closed by Windows.
You will need to restart the program.
An error log is being created.
__________________________________________________ _________
This happens whether I try to do this from my PC or from the actual server I am creating the subscription on.
Has anyone else had this issue? Is there a hotfix I need?
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
Craig
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 26, 2004
I am using merge replication with a push subscription type. I am wondering if the updates of the tables on the subscriber side are push to the publisher from the subscriber or pulled from the subscriber by the publisher when the syncronisation takes place. this makes a big diferrence for me and i can't find the answer to this question anywhere...
if anyone could answer it would be really appreciated
Thanks
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 17, 2007
Using SQL CE 3.1 merge replication. Working fine, but want to make subscription read only. In other words, master/slave pattern.
How is this accomplished?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 22, 2007
Hi.
I have setup an SQL Server 2005 Merge Replication.
Now I need to display the status of the replication programatically from the subscriber side, I have checked the documentation which mentions MergeSubscription & MergeSubscriberMonitor but I couldn't know how to use them!!
Any Help ?
Thanks
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 20, 2006
Using Merge replication between SQL Server 2000 and SQL Server CE,
is there any way that row deletes could occur on the subscriber without a reinitialize
or explicit delete of row on publisher.
More specifically, if there is a row filter that returns a days worth of data with each
days pull, for example, and the filter looked like
select <columns> from Table where UpdateDate < GETDATE() and UpdateDate >= DATEADD(d,1,GETDATE())
would there be some implicit delete at subscriber each day because data sent changed?
My research indicates this does not happen, but I have a colleague who thinks differently.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 20, 2007
Hi,
I have setup merge replication between SQL Server 2005 and SQL Server Express. The setup uses web synchronization. (And the setup uses dynamic filter HOST_NAME)
On some of the client machines, replication fails with the following error (when initializing the subscription):
from subscriber merge agent verbose log:
A dynamic snapshot will be applied from 'D:DOCUME~1JBAUMG~1.CORLOCALS~1TempDB101-EQA-SCL_BQDB_BQ_PUB_BQDB'
Validating dynamic snapshot
2007-04-1819:39:45.434 OLE DB Subscriber 'FRG-BAUMGARTENJSQLEXPRESS': sys.sp_MSregisterdynsnapseqno @snapshot_session_token=N'\XXX.XX.XX.XXSnapshotuncDB101-EQA-SCL_BQDB_BQ_PUB20070417180079dynsnap', @dynsnapseqno='5599F67E-A1A9-4573-A14F-9851F6FE4B51'
(Note: XXX.XX.XX.XX is a proper IP of DB, I have just masked it in the post)
The merge process was unable to deliver the snapshot to the Subscriber. If using Web synchronization, the merge process may have been unable to create or write to the message file.When troubleshooting, restart the synchronization with verbose history logging and specify an output file to which to write.
I enabled verbose logging for the snapshot agent for the subscriber, but there was no error there. It is obvious from the log info above that the error occurs only after downloading the snapshot to the client and during applying it to the subscriber by the merge agent.
After I got this error, I tried running the subscriber program again and it successfully replicated on the third attempt. But this behavior is not consistent and it fails for most of the time on some of the machines
Any info on this error?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 28, 2007
Hi,
I need a urgent help! The problem is that every synchronization only transfer data from subscriber to publisher, but not the other direction. The publisher is sql server 2005 standard edition, and the subscriber is 2005 express. Is that any stored-procedure to deal with such a problem?
Thanks for any commnet.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jun 29, 2015
I have the merge replication (Push) for SQL Server 2008.The right-click option for Start and Stop Synchronizing in subscriptions has been disabled. How can I stop the merge replication and start again ?
This error happened 1 week after I created the merge replication. The merge data cannot sync to subscriber and only solution I can use is drop and re-create the merge replication again but error would be re-occur a week later. The merge replication work fine before and start from middle on May 2015, but it keep happen right now.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jul 18, 2007
Hi all,
We are using a mix of SQL 2005 and 2000 servers and our "main" database server is running SQL 2005 x64 (SP2 ver. 3042).
Our system has run perfectly for months, then subsequent to an SP2 update we are seeing several instances where the data record counts are different for several tables among all the servers.
We are using Merge Replication, with no filters and published every 2 minutes.
Any ideas?
TIA,
Michael
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 9, 2007
How to speedup data from subscriber to Publisher on Merge replication?
Is there any we can speed up data from Subscriber to Publisher (uploading).
Subscriber downloading data from publisher running more than 20 hours after drop and recreate subscriber.
Could you please post reply.
Regards
Ponnu
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 13, 2004
These errors occur at the subscriber. First, "The merge process could
not query the last sent and received generations" is generated, then
immediately afterwards, "invalid cursor state" is generated. We are
trying to pull a new subscription snapshot from the republisher. The
subscriber has been added and removed from the replusher's pull
subscriptions a number of times for testing. Now, we cannot get the
subscriber to re-sync with the republisher.
Any ideas?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 27, 2006
Hi all.
I get the following error when trying to run a pull subscription from the subscriber:
The schema script '' could not be propagated to the subscriber.
(Source: Merge Replication Provider (Agent); Error number: -2147201001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The process could not connect to FTP site 'ftp://ESOFTSERVER.NO-IP.INFO' using port 21.
(Source: ESOFT (Agent); Error number: 0)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The connection with the server was reset
(Source: (OS); Error number: 12031)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I've tried everything I could to solve this problem, but I can't get it working.
Thanks for any advise.
Fabio Reynoso
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 9, 2006
We have SQL Server 2000 with merge replication at a Publisher and subscriber.
We have some records getting deleted at Publisher and Subscriber and no conflicts are logged.
We have tried the compensate_for_errors setting and this has had no effect.
This is causing serious data corruption and has now become an URGENT issue. Out tech team are almost out of ideas.
Has anyone experienced this or have any ideas as to what to check next?
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 12, 2015
We have a filtered publisher (SQL Server 2012) with several pull and push subscriptions that have been functioning fine for years.
We have just added a new pull subscriber from a remote server. We configured an alternate folder location on the subscriber (pointing to existing path on a remote server). We generated new snapshot and partitioned snapshot, and moved to subscribing server at alternate path.We're seeing a problem we've never seen before:
When the merge agent runs, it applies the schema and performs a few hundred bulk inserts, but then proceeds to 'download changes to subscriber' as though the snapshot is old (it is brand new and should have all transactions). We have never seen this before, i.e. all data is usually applied in bulk when creating a new or reinitializing an existing subscriber.
we marked the subscriber for re-initialization (from both the publishing and subscribing server) with a fresh set of snapshots. The same problem occurred.We have also tried in our test environment (which mirrors production) and the snapshot applies as expected (via bulk inserts).
(It might be relevant to note the publisher was recently upgraded in-place from 2005 to 2012.)
View 11 Replies
View Related
May 14, 2015
How to check if web merge sync is working between a subscriber and publisher thru HTTPS ? SQL port 1433 at subscriber is blocked so no direct connection to subscriber.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 22, 2015
I have a merge replication. Currently works fine. Publisher & Distributor are on the same server. I need to change the location of the alternate folder for the snapshot files.
I’ll probably just change it through the GUI, but would I use sp_changedistpublisher or sp_changemergepublication if I were scripting everything?
My real concern is the subscribers. Do I have to ‘tell’ the subscribers where the alt folder has been changed to? Do I just run sp_changemergepullsubscription on the subscribers?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 5, 2007
Getting this error after successfully setting up merge replication scenario:
The server agent could not connect to the publisher (29049)
Well, successful all the way up to the point of subscribing that is.
The publication is configured with IIS 5 under XP. Already had a 3.1 sample publication running. The new web share is running sqlcesa35.dll and successfully loads diag page. The publication snapshot is successfully created. The snapshot agent and IUSR accounts have permission in publication and distribution dbs and are both in the PAL. I created the publication under SQL 2008 Mgt Studio. The web config did not work from within Mgt Studio, but did work when I ran wizard from Start Menu. Subscription steps all seem normal and then when attempt to sync at end of wizard get this error.
Will try again tomorrow with fresh environment, only using SQL 2005, SQLCE 3.5 and the 3.5 server tools. This is on a secondary test machine with lots of new Visual Studio stuff etc.
Reference here on MSDN says contact product support if reproducible.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms172357.aspx
View 13 Replies
View Related
Oct 8, 2015
when prod db is restored in test server, i have to hide/replace sensitive fields (name, phone etc)Is it doable in SQL 2008 and SQL 2012?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 16, 2004
Hi,
I'm using merge replication to maintain a backup copy of my main (publisher)MSDE database. A push subscription periodically (1 per minute) updates the backup DB.
It's intended that if the main db goes down then the backup (subscription) db can be configured as a publisher. This must all be performed via scripting.
The initial configuration of the main publisher and subscription is controlled via scripting, which works fine.
The problems occur when I try to configure the subsciber to become a publisher. A script is executed on the subscriber but fails at the point when it's configuring the publisher detail. The error is something like "unable to configure a publication for a database setup as an anonymous subscription".
I'm guessing that there are subscritpion artifacts added to the database which need to be removed before it can be configured as a new publisher.
Please help,
Jez W
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 12, 2015
I am getting "Row not found on subscriber" error on the subscriber. I am trying to find the root cause.
1. Records get lost during publication initialization from backup, could not reproduce it though. I was inserting records in a loop into a replicated table while initializing the publication from backup. After the backup/restore finished, I have stopped the insert, allowed the replication to catch up and compared the row count, it was identical.
2. Someone or some process is deleting the records on the subscriber. Setup Audit, but could not confirm this theory so far.
3. Records get deleted twice, as we publish the execution of some bulk delete archive jobs, to fix latency issues. Found this article, which says, this is not the case:
[URL]
4. Records are deleted on the subscriber by triggers. The impacted database has no triggers.
I am running SQL Server 2008 R2.
What else could be the cause of this problem?
View 0 Replies
View Related
Oct 31, 2006
Hi ..
I know that SQL Server Express 2005 can subscribet to SQL Server 2000 publications. However, it seems that SQL server 2000 cannot perform a push to SQL Express.
Can anyone refer me to any online help or documentation on how a proper replication can be done between SQL 2005 Exress and SQL 2000??
Thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 23, 2006
SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition act as publisher and distributor.
All subscribers are SQL Server 2005 Express Edition.
According to 2005 book online, "MSMerge_History table exists in distribution database". Howevey I found this table in Subscriber database which is in SQL Server 2005 Express Edition.
The problem is this table (MSMerge_History) and other two tables (MSMerge_genhistory, MSRepl_errors) are quite large. We want to keep SQL Server 2005 Express database as small as possible so we can put more data into it.
Is there anyway (Manually or automatically) to clean those tables in SQL Server 2005 Express? Please help.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 15, 2015
Any experience of success or failure setting up CDC on the subscriber end of transactional replication?
Also for a bonus answer, why are explicit index operations not permitted (I'm assuming this is even on the publisher?) From BOL:
• Explicitly adding, dropping, or altering indexes is not supported. Indexes created implicitly for constraints (such as a primary key constraint) are supported.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Jul 30, 2014
I have a setup of transaction replication between one publisher and subscriber in the Same server.Now, I need to add a new subscriber to the existing publisher. So publisher database name is DB_A and Subscriber 1 name is DB_B. So the new subscriber will be DB_C. Is this kind of setup possible on one server?
If yes then at the time of reinitialization is it going to apply the snapshot on DB_B as well as DB_C?Also let say if due to disk error DB_B gets corrupted then will data be still replicated between DB_A and DB_C? (Assuming publisher, subscriber 1 and 2 are sitting on individual disks).
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 19, 2006
I have two SQL 2005 Standard servers using merge replication, and out of the blue started getting failure notices regarding "The merge process could not enumerate changes at the 'Subscriber'." I turned on verbose logging and noticed the following section:
2006-04-19 12:53:33.227 Category:NULL
Source: Merge Replication Provider
Number: -2147200999
Message: The merge process could not enumerate changes at the 'Subscriber'. When troubleshooting, restart the synchronization with verbose history logging and specify an output file to which to write.
2006-04-19 12:53:33.227 The Merge Agent was unable to update information about the last synchronization at the Subscriber. Ensure that the subscription exists at the Subscriber, and restart the Merge Agent.
2006-04-19 12:53:33.227 The merge process was unable to update last synchronization information at the Publisher.
Using Profiler on both sides, I don't see anything out the ordinary during the replication process until there are two calls in a row to the stored procedure sp_MSadd_merge_history90, where the second one is storing the error message listed above.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Scott Davis
View 8 Replies
View Related
Apr 27, 2007
Hi,
I've seen quite a few posts about this error message but so far no answers. I'm merge replicating between SQL Server 2005 SP2 and SQL Server 2005 Mobile. Everything seems to run really well until at some point I get the above error message while running the replication from the device. It seems to happen just after I've made a schema change on the server e.g. the latest one was adding some new columns (which allow nulls) to replicated tables.
I've switched on verbose logging and I get the following:
2007/04/27 13:57:06 Hr=00000000 Compression Level set to 1
2007/04/27 13:57:06 Hr=00000000 Count of active RSCBs = 0
2007/04/27 13:57:06 Thread=B04 RSCB=15 Command=OPWC Hr=00000000 Total Compressed bytes in = 846
2007/04/27 13:57:06 Thread=B04 RSCB=15 Command=OPWC Hr=00000000 Total Uncompressed bytes in = 1442
2007/04/27 13:57:06 Thread=B04 RSCB=15 Command=OPWC Hr=00000000 Responding to OpenWrite, total bytes = 846
2007/04/27 13:57:06 Thread=B04 RSCB=15 Command=OPWC Hr=00000000 C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server 2005 Mobile Editionserverctmobilesql30.7AABD0FB7460_010309C7-9030-4CF9-7D60-A64608CD62F7 0
2007/04/27 13:57:06 Thread=E54 RSCB=15 Command=SYNC Hr=00000000 Synchronize prepped 0
<PARAMS RSCB="15" HostName="" Publisher="WINSERVER" PublisherNetwork="" PublisherAddress="" PublisherSecurityMode="1" PublisherLogin="" PublisherDatabase="CompacTimesheet_Staging" Publication="CompacTimesheet_Staging" ProfileName="DEFAULT" SubscriberServer="CTimeMobile - 7aabd0fb7460" SubscriberDatabasePath="Program FilesCompac TimesheetDataCompacTimesheetMobile.sdf" Distributor="WINSERVER" DistributorNetwork="" DistributorAddress="" DistributorSecurityMode="1" DistributorLogin="" ExchangeType="3" ValidationType="0" QueryTimeout="300" LoginTimeout="15" SnapshotTransferType="0" DistributorSessionId="452"/>
2007/04/27 13:57:06 Thread=E54 RSCB=15 Command=SYNC Hr=80045019 The merge process could not enumerate changes at the 'Subscriber'. When troubleshooting, restart the synchronization with verbose history logging and specify an output file to which to write. -2147200999
2007/04/27 13:57:06 Thread=E54 RSCB=15 Command=SYNC Hr=80045645 The process was successfully stopped. -2147199419
2007/04/27 13:57:06 Thread=E54 RSCB=15 Command=SCHK Hr=80004005 SyncCheck responding 0
2007/04/27 13:57:06 Thread=E54 RSCB=15 Command=SCHK Hr=00000000 Removing this RSCB 0
The error message doesn't seem very helpful. Is there another way to find out what is causing the problem? I've tried reinitializing all subscriptions and generating a new snapshot but it makes no difference. The only way I've found to fix this is to delete the database on the subscriber and synchronise again (losing all subscriber data since the last sync).
Regards,
Greg
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 25, 2007
Hi,
I have a merge (SQL 2005 Standard -> Express) topolgoy which is having problems
The main problem is that the join filters don't seem to work for one area and I am hoping someone can help me with some troubleshooting advice
There are 140+ tables in the topology but the ones causing particular pain are a parent child relationship where the child is actually a bridge/linking table to another table.
Therefore although it is a parent child in the replication filters it is the reverse. i.e. the child has the paramterised filter on it and the parent is one level down joined by it's id. There are other tables joined to this parent table but it stays at three levels deep. The @join_unique_key therefore is set to 0 as is the partition options for the parent /child relationship.
However, when we synchronise we have a problem. The rows get inserted in to the database in RI order but only the child records are replicated down to the subscriber.
The child table with the parameterised filter has 13 articles joined to it in total and one of the other branches of join filters go down as deep as four levels. Most though do not.
Does anyone have any suggestions as to why this might be happening? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers, James
P.S. I should add this problem only occurs when the edits are made at the publisher. If new records are added at the subscriber everything is fine.
View 9 Replies
View Related